Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r101-tall-167814475100242.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r101-tall-167814475100242
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 832K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K Feb 26 15:19 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K Feb 26 15:19 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Feb 26 15:18 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K Feb 26 15:18 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 15:49 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Feb 25 15:49 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Feb 25 15:49 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Feb 25 15:49 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 26 15:20 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 106K Feb 26 15:20 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K Feb 26 15:20 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K Feb 26 15:20 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Feb 25 15:49 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 15:49 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 432K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678239892635

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-08 01:44:54] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-08 01:44:54] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-08 01:44:54] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 94 ms
[2023-03-08 01:44:54] [INFO ] Transformed 1440 places.
[2023-03-08 01:44:54] [INFO ] Transformed 672 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:44:54] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1440 places and 672 transitions and 2688 arcs in 177 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1093 places in 5 ms
Reduce places removed 1093 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 347 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 347/347 places, 672/672 transitions.
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 80 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 80 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 101 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 326 transition count 592
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 267 transition count 512
Iterating global reduction 1 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 267 transition count 512
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 267 transition count 502
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 267 place count 229 transition count 464
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 229 transition count 464
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 229 transition count 462
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 321 place count 215 transition count 446
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 215 transition count 446
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 215 transition count 430
Applied a total of 351 rules in 64 ms. Remains 215 /347 variables (removed 132) and now considering 430/672 (removed 242) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 430 rows 215 cols
[2023-03-08 01:44:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 23 ms
[2023-03-08 01:44:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 407 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:44:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:44:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 243 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:44:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 768 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1202 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:44:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:44:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 170 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 215/347 places, 430/672 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1440 ms. Remains : 215/347 places, 430/672 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 215 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-08 01:44:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2023-03-08 01:44:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2023-03-08 01:44:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 430 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2303 resets, run finished after 515 ms. (steps per millisecond=19 ) properties (out of 64) seen :9
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 91 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 35 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 55) seen :4
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 34 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 25 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 62 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 27 ms. (steps per millisecond=37 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 98 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 34 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 113 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 160 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 51 properties.
[2023-03-08 01:44:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:44:58] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:44:58] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:44:58] [INFO ] After 620ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:51
[2023-03-08 01:44:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:44:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:45:01] [INFO ] After 2257ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :6 sat :45
[2023-03-08 01:45:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 243 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:45:04] [INFO ] After 3383ms SMT Verify possible using 243 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :6 sat :45
[2023-03-08 01:45:08] [INFO ] After 7391ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :6 sat :45
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 3590 ms.
[2023-03-08 01:45:12] [INFO ] After 14183ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :6 sat :45
Fused 51 Parikh solutions to 45 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 225 ms.
Support contains 59 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 204 transition count 405
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 204 transition count 405
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 204 transition count 403
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 196 transition count 393
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 196 transition count 393
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 196 transition count 391
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 192 transition count 382
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 192 transition count 382
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 192 transition count 377
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 191 transition count 376
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 191 transition count 376
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 190 transition count 375
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 190 transition count 375
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 190 transition count 374
Applied a total of 60 rules in 66 ms. Remains 190 /215 variables (removed 25) and now considering 374/430 (removed 56) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 66 ms. Remains : 190/215 places, 374/430 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2356 resets, run finished after 336 ms. (steps per millisecond=29 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 90 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 34 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 36 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 23 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 98 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 101 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 155 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 35 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 438625 steps, run visited all 45 properties in 1575 ms. (steps per millisecond=278 )
Probabilistic random walk after 438625 steps, saw 159366 distinct states, run finished after 1575 ms. (steps per millisecond=278 ) properties seen :45
Successfully simplified 6 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 430 transitions.
Support contains 68 out of 215 places (down from 70) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 850 edges and 215 vertex of which 214 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 171 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 171 transition count 268
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 171 transition count 259
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 138 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 138 transition count 224
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 138 transition count 218
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 115 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 115 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 115 transition count 166
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 106 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 106 transition count 150
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 106 transition count 146
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 256 place count 101 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 101 transition count 141
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 101 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 266 place count 98 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 98 transition count 136
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 270 place count 97 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 97 transition count 134
Applied a total of 271 rules in 23 ms. Remains 97 /215 variables (removed 118) and now considering 134/430 (removed 296) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 134 rows 97 cols
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 237 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 64 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/215 places, 134/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 327 ms. Remains : 97/215 places, 134/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 134 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability335901648758725598.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9193149235773859628.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability335901648758725598.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9193149235773859628.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109655,1.2887,45264,2,9232,5,120910,6,0,522,134952,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EG(EF(((AG(((p26>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + ((p77>=1)&&(l405>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l610>=1))))) + !(A(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l1222>=1))) U ((p94>=1)&&(l0>=...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(!(!((E(!(((p94>=1)&&(l0>=1))) U (!(!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1222>=1)))))) * !(((p94>=1)&&(l0>=1))))) +...303
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t...547
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,8.51256,248104,1,0,440,1.15636e+06,308,196,3788,811952,519
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 167 transition count 253
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 167 transition count 253
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 167 transition count 245
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 133 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 133 transition count 209
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 133 transition count 203
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 110 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 110 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 110 transition count 155
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 243 place count 101 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 101 transition count 139
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 101 transition count 135
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 262 place count 95 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 95 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 95 transition count 122
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 273 place count 92 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 92 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 277 place count 91 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 91 transition count 117
Applied a total of 278 rules in 45 ms. Remains 91 /215 variables (removed 124) and now considering 117/430 (removed 313) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 91 cols
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 248 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 349 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 132 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/215 places, 117/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 528 ms. Remains : 91/215 places, 117/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1856936284415289679.gal : 8 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9642526429926938646.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1856936284415289679.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9642526429926938646.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,99772,0.672017,28788,2,6806,5,80081,6,0,481,82956,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(A(AX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l951>=1)))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1217>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1217>=1))) U (!(!(EX(!(!(((s1>=1)&&(l951>=1))))))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l...214
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t52, t53, t55, t58, t59, t60, t61, t63, t76, t83, t...435
(forward)formula 0,0,7.53664,232032,1,0,459,1.08666e+06,265,205,3517,901338,517
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 167 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 167 transition count 247
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 167 transition count 242
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 133 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 133 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 133 transition count 200
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 109 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 109 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 109 transition count 149
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 99 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 99 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 99 transition count 130
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 263 place count 92 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 92 transition count 123
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 92 transition count 121
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 276 place count 88 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 88 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 88 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 284 place count 87 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 87 transition count 112
Applied a total of 285 rules in 19 ms. Remains 87 /215 variables (removed 128) and now considering 112/430 (removed 318) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 87 cols
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 121 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 59 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 87/215 places, 112/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 251 ms. Remains : 87/215 places, 112/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 112 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7952751449352505159.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16492860727456310887.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7952751449352505159.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16492860727456310887.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,68042,0.612959,27052,2,6333,5,80434,6,0,460,72172,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l525>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l525>=1))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t40, t42, t49, t55, t56, t57, t73, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t85, t86, t...390
(forward)formula 0,0,3.70606,116140,1,0,395,464596,252,207,3208,478764,372
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 168 transition count 251
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 168 transition count 251
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 168 transition count 246
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 134 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 134 transition count 210
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 134 transition count 204
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 197 place count 110 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 110 transition count 163
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 110 transition count 151
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 242 place count 101 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 101 transition count 135
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 101 transition count 133
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 260 place count 94 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 94 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 94 transition count 124
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 273 place count 90 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 90 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 90 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 281 place count 89 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 89 transition count 115
Applied a total of 282 rules in 27 ms. Remains 89 /215 variables (removed 126) and now considering 115/430 (removed 315) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 89 cols
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 325 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 56 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/215 places, 115/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 410 ms. Remains : 89/215 places, 115/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9766176813007956327.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1013277066427627086.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9766176813007956327.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1013277066427627086.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,73909,0.477817,23828,2,5691,5,60507,6,0,471,62581,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX(((s1<1)||(l455<1))) * ((s1<1)||(l607<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l455<1))))) * ((s1<1)||(l607<1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t44, t50, t52, t58, t59, t60, t76, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t...393
(forward)formula 0,1,3.24759,104416,1,0,388,370288,254,211,3273,433237,372
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 168 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 168 transition count 258
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 168 transition count 250
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 135 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 135 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 135 transition count 211
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 112 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 112 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 112 transition count 162
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 237 place count 104 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 104 transition count 148
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 104 transition count 146
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 254 place count 97 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 97 transition count 134
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 97 transition count 132
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 267 place count 93 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 93 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 93 transition count 127
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 273 place count 92 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 92 transition count 125
Applied a total of 274 rules in 31 ms. Remains 92 /215 variables (removed 123) and now considering 125/430 (removed 305) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 92 cols
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 64 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/215 places, 125/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 320 ms. Remains : 92/215 places, 125/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2304 resets, run finished after 29 ms. (steps per millisecond=344 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15299177614887798717.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14114103395125844737.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15299177614887798717.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14114103395125844737.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 458 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=625 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14114103395125844737.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 20
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :20 after 46
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :46 after 72
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :72 after 124
Finished probabilistic random walk after 33518 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 51 ms. (steps per millisecond=657 )
Probabilistic random walk after 33518 steps, saw 15034 distinct states, run finished after 51 ms. (steps per millisecond=657 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
ITS runner failed with exception null
java.lang.InterruptedException
at java.base/java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1304)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1372)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.AbstractRunner.join(AbstractRunner.java:27)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner.join(ITSRunner.java:177)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.global.GlobalPropertySolver.verifyWithSDD(GlobalPropertySolver.java:675)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.ReachabilitySolver.lambda$2(ReachabilitySolver.java:63)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 166 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 166 transition count 246
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :124 after 228
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 166 transition count 241
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 132 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 132 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 132 transition count 199
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 108 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 108 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 108 transition count 146
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 246 place count 99 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 99 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 99 transition count 128
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 264 place count 92 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 92 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 92 transition count 119
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 277 place count 88 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 88 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 88 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 285 place count 87 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 87 transition count 110
Applied a total of 286 rules in 13 ms. Remains 87 /215 variables (removed 128) and now considering 110/430 (removed 320) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 87 cols
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :228 after 766
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :766 after 1412
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1412 after 4841
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 205 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :4841 after 23190
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 57 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 87/215 places, 110/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 276 ms. Remains : 87/215 places, 110/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7388477911280290927.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7549660640566476756.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7388477911280290927.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7549660640566476756.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :23190 after 45156
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,68568,0.617701,26600,2,5785,5,79403,6,0,458,72649,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,95269,1.07848,40316,2,6790,16,119032,7,0,494,98621,0
Total reachable state count : 95269

Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Invariant property DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-04 does not hold.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-04,12,1.0794,40316,2,98,16,119032,7,0,498,98621,0
original formula: (AX(AX(FALSE)) + AG(((s1<1)||(l448<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))))))),TRUE) * !(((s1<1)||(l448<1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t41, t47, t53, t54, t55, t71, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t85, t...383
(forward)formula 0,0,2.53213,79808,1,0,207,303447,238,86,3214,199616,233
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 179 transition count 318
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 179 transition count 318
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 179 transition count 305
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 155 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 155 transition count 279
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 155 transition count 272
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 154 place count 141 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 141 transition count 246
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 141 transition count 233
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 137 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 137 transition count 228
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 137 transition count 225
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 135 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 135 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 197 place count 134 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 134 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 133 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 133 transition count 220
Applied a total of 200 rules in 16 ms. Remains 133 /215 variables (removed 82) and now considering 220/430 (removed 210) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 133 cols
[2023-03-08 01:45:43] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:45:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:45:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 109 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:45:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 228 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 304 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:45:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:45:43] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 81 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/215 places, 220/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 403 ms. Remains : 133/215 places, 220/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:45:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3205588210477100084.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:45:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15775508534668011390.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3205588210477100084.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15775508534668011390.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,505891,6.43513,184636,2,16236,5,472701,6,0,752,355075,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(AF(AX(((((s1>=1)&&(l1284>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l608>=1))) * EX(((s1>=1)&&(l610>=1))))))) * A(!((!(((((s1>=1)&&(l1221>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l36>...481
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * EX(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((((s1>=1)&&(l1284>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l608>=1))) * EX(((s1>=1)&&(l610>=1)))))))))))) *...1659
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t39, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50,...886
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 01:46:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 01:46:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3590708440656638179.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3590708440656638179.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3590708440656638179.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3590708440656638179.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3590708440656638179.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 01:46:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 01:46:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 01:46:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 217 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:46:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 129 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2023-03-08 01:46:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability645374251095907714.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1698687078514351540.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability645374251095907714.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1698687078514351540.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,505891,10.1145,316140,2170,3360,113825,38788,495,3.49435e+06,251,222114,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(AF(AX(((((u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.u19.l1284>=1))||((u0.s1>=1)&&(u0.l608>=1))) * EX(((u0.s1>=1)&&(u0.l610>=1))))))) * A(!((!(((((u0.s1>=1)&&(i4...635
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * EX(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((((u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.u19.l1284>=1))||((u0.s1>=1)&&(u0.l608>=1))) * EX(((u0.s1>=1)&&(u0...2211
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t41, t55, t56, t70, t71, t100, t101, t102, t103, t104, t120, t121, ...868
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,21.4319,559776,1,0,324287,184640,2296,4.94273e+06,1521,1.30725e+06,651428
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 166 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 166 transition count 246
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 166 transition count 241
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 131 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 131 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 131 transition count 198
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 106 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 106 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 106 transition count 144
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 251 place count 96 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 96 transition count 127
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 96 transition count 125
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 88 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 88 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 88 transition count 110
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 285 place count 84 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 84 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 84 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 293 place count 83 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 83 transition count 101
Applied a total of 294 rules in 13 ms. Remains 83 /215 variables (removed 132) and now considering 101/430 (removed 329) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 83 cols
[2023-03-08 01:46:35] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:46:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:46:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:46:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 110 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:46:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:46:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 46 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/215 places, 101/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 223 ms. Remains : 83/215 places, 101/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:46:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:46:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18166554352330602289.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5002455688118108005.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18166554352330602289.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5002455688118108005.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59273,0.438806,21380,2,5340,5,61757,6,0,433,58395,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(EX(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l954>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EX(!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l954>=1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t63, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t76, t77, t78, t...364
(forward)formula 0,0,2.01005,72124,1,0,202,286766,224,84,2992,150608,223
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 168 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 168 transition count 258
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 168 transition count 250
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 135 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 135 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 135 transition count 211
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 113 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 113 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 113 transition count 163
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 106 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 106 transition count 151
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 248 place count 99 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 99 transition count 139
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 99 transition count 137
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 261 place count 95 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 95 transition count 133
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 95 transition count 132
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 267 place count 94 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 94 transition count 130
Applied a total of 268 rules in 19 ms. Remains 94 /215 variables (removed 121) and now considering 130/430 (removed 300) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 130 rows 94 cols
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 48 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 204 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 64 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/215 places, 130/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 303 ms. Remains : 94/215 places, 130/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 130 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12183527595716948547.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10826661299499917757.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12183527595716948547.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10826661299499917757.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,98453,1.17958,45028,2,7710,5,136190,6,0,506,110204,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AF(AX((EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1221>=1))) * ((s1<1)||(l1021<1))))) + AX(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l1026>=1))))) + ((s4>=1)&&(l0>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((s4>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) * !(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l1221>=1))) * ((s1<1...221
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t53, t54, t56, t58, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t85, t...463
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,7.16038,221036,1,0,379,1.12207e+06,295,174,3663,728357,425
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 169 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 169 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 169 transition count 251
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 137 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 137 transition count 217
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 137 transition count 213
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 191 place count 114 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 114 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 114 transition count 164
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 106 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 106 transition count 151
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 106 transition count 149
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 249 place count 100 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 100 transition count 143
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 100 transition count 141
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 260 place count 97 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 97 transition count 138
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 97 transition count 137
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 265 place count 96 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 96 transition count 135
Applied a total of 266 rules in 15 ms. Remains 96 /215 variables (removed 119) and now considering 135/430 (removed 295) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 96 cols
[2023-03-08 01:46:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:46:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:46:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 51 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:46:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 198 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 256 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:46:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:46:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 69 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/215 places, 135/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 353 ms. Remains : 96/215 places, 135/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:46:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:46:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3830662473679858185.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3743050508558127056.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3830662473679858185.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3743050508558127056.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,108939,1.61471,56204,2,8984,5,170476,6,0,519,150199,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX((!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l526>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1220>=1)))) + AX(((s1<1)||(l1021<1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX((!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l526>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1220>=1)))) + !(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l1021<1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t40, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t55, t56, t57, t63, t66, t68, t...498
(forward)formula 0,1,6.10794,165140,1,0,448,628807,298,224,3633,630690,422
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 171 transition count 263
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 171 transition count 263
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 171 transition count 258
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 141 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 1 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 141 transition count 226
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 141 transition count 221
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 124 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 124 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 124 transition count 182
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 205 place count 120 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 120 transition count 176
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 212 place count 117 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 117 transition count 173
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 217 place count 115 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 115 transition count 171
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 220 place count 114 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 114 transition count 169
Applied a total of 221 rules in 19 ms. Remains 114 /215 variables (removed 101) and now considering 169/430 (removed 261) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 114 cols
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 199 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 265 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 75 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/215 places, 169/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 361 ms. Remains : 114/215 places, 169/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 169 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8473529634937857400.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:46:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4900640433416307280.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8473529634937857400.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4900640433416307280.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,251977,2.93829,93092,2,13435,5,263426,6,0,625,232739,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((((!(E(((p107>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l525>=1)))) + A(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l456>=1))) U !(((s1>=1)&&(l0>=1))))) * (((AX(((p76>=1)&&(l447>...355
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!((((!(E(((p107>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l525>=1)))) + !((E(!(!(((s1>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) U (!(!(EX...559
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t33, t34, t41, t43, t44, t45, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51,...692
(forward)formula 0,1,18.9817,531148,1,0,730,2.30348e+06,397,367,4384,2.08364e+06,782
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 168 transition count 267
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 168 transition count 267
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 168 transition count 260
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 133 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 133 transition count 223
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 133 transition count 215
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 109 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 109 transition count 177
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 109 transition count 160
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 253 place count 100 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 100 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 100 transition count 142
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 93 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 93 transition count 130
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 282 place count 89 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 89 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 89 transition count 123
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 290 place count 88 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 88 transition count 121
Applied a total of 291 rules in 33 ms. Remains 88 /215 variables (removed 127) and now considering 121/430 (removed 309) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 88 cols
[2023-03-08 01:47:11] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:47:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:47:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:47:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 180 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:47:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:47:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:47:12] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/215 places, 121/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 279 ms. Remains : 88/215 places, 121/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:47:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:47:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability215052621363172790.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4630765406436690260.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability215052621363172790.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4630765406436690260.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,81929,0.742209,30408,2,7711,5,96426,6,0,473,86530,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((AG(((s1<1)||(l608<1))) + (((s1<1)||(l1307<1))&&((s1<1)||(l606<1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((s1<1)||(l608<1))))) + (((s1<1)||(l1307<1))&&((s1<1)||(l606<1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t...504
(forward)formula 0,1,4.73811,140180,1,0,308,582060,269,124,3429,409896,350
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 173 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 173 transition count 295
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 173 transition count 283
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 142 transition count 250
Iterating global reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 142 transition count 250
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 142 transition count 242
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 186 place count 122 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 122 transition count 209
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 122 transition count 195
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 114 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 114 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 114 transition count 175
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 248 place count 110 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 110 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 110 transition count 164
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 109 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 109 transition count 163
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 257 place count 108 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 108 transition count 161
Applied a total of 258 rules in 16 ms. Remains 108 /215 variables (removed 107) and now considering 161/430 (removed 269) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 108 cols
[2023-03-08 01:47:16] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 242 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 66 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/215 places, 161/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 327 ms. Remains : 108/215 places, 161/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 161 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4980846709191119738.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8514168887730747605.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4980846709191119738.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8514168887730747605.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,189495,2.05205,71676,2,10713,5,185302,6,0,593,174013,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EX(!(AF(E(((s1>=1)&&(l951>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l610>=1)))))) * (EX(EX((((p68>=1)&&(l618>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1226>=1))))) + (!(((s1>=1)&&(l1...304
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(!(((s1<1)||(l608<1)))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!(!(((s1<1)||(l608<1))))))) U (!((EX(!(!(EG(!(...461
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t...640
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,18.2079,506020,1,0,930,2.57194e+06,369,526,4332,1.85751e+06,942
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 174 transition count 285
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 174 transition count 285
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 174 transition count 278
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 144 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 1 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 144 transition count 246
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 144 transition count 239
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 126 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 126 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 126 transition count 199
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 211 place count 120 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 120 transition count 189
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 120 transition count 183
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 224 place count 119 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 119 transition count 182
Applied a total of 225 rules in 14 ms. Remains 119 /215 variables (removed 96) and now considering 182/430 (removed 248) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 182 rows 119 cols
[2023-03-08 01:47:35] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:47:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:47:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 71 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:47:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 284 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:47:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:47:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 114 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/215 places, 182/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 412 ms. Remains : 119/215 places, 182/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:47:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 182 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:47:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7252566763982611636.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7901266884624445351.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7252566763982611636.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7901266884624445351.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,277788,2.91745,90908,2,12671,5,267127,6,0,658,241339,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l606>=1)))) * EX(((EX(((s1<1)||(l1305<1))) + E(((s1>=1)&&(l1307>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1255>=1)))) + (AG(((s1>=1)&&(l122...318
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l606>=1))))))))) * ((s1<1)||(l1305<1)))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(EY(...961
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t17, t29, t31, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t...739
(forward)formula 0,1,13.808,364384,1,0,441,1.813e+06,388,172,4700,1.04593e+06,491
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 168 transition count 257
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 168 transition count 257
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 168 transition count 252
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 133 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 133 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 133 transition count 208
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 108 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 108 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 108 transition count 153
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 249 place count 98 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 98 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 98 transition count 134
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 90 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 90 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 90 transition count 119
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 283 place count 86 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 86 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 86 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 291 place count 85 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 85 transition count 110
Applied a total of 292 rules in 45 ms. Remains 85 /215 variables (removed 130) and now considering 110/430 (removed 320) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 85 cols
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 64 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/215 places, 110/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 345 ms. Remains : 85/215 places, 110/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4200792765505093172.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11529166445672616381.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4200792765505093172.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11529166445672616381.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61816,0.397385,20916,2,5635,5,58873,6,0,450,50664,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((((s1>=1)&&(l608>=1))||((s2>=1)&&(l1258>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((s1>=1)&&(l608>=1))||((s2>=1)&&(l1258>=1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t70, t78, t79, t80, t...408
(forward)formula 0,0,1.55101,56576,1,0,206,205459,242,82,3078,119755,234
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 430/430 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 168 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 168 transition count 252
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 168 transition count 247
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 137 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 137 transition count 214
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 137 transition count 209
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 115 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 115 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 115 transition count 162
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 108 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 108 transition count 149
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 108 transition count 148
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 242 place count 102 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 102 transition count 137
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 102 transition count 135
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 253 place count 99 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 99 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 99 transition count 131
Applied a total of 257 rules in 6 ms. Remains 99 /215 variables (removed 116) and now considering 131/430 (removed 299) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 131 rows 99 cols
[2023-03-08 01:47:51] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 236 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 64 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/215 places, 131/430 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 307 ms. Remains : 99/215 places, 131/430 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 131 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7763075792934140382.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1541867083596002037.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7763075792934140382.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1541867083596002037.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,113160,1.31838,44932,2,9685,5,130120,6,0,527,126583,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG((((s1>=1)&&(l461>=1)) + AG(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l1019>=1)))))) * (p84>=1)) * (l447>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !((((s1>=1)&&(l461>=1)) + !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1019>=1)))))))))))) * (p84>=...182
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t28, t37, t45, t51, t53, t54, t55, t61, t62, t64, t66, t72, t73, t74, t...489
(forward)formula 0,0,6.24539,157608,1,0,278,556156,291,113,3818,421267,301
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2023-03-08 01:47:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-08 01:47:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Total runtime 184528 ms.

BK_STOP 1678240081907

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r101-tall-167814475100242"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;