Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r101-tall-167814475100202.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r101-tall-167814475100202
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 572K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Feb 26 15:32 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K Feb 26 15:32 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Feb 26 15:31 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K Feb 26 15:31 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K Feb 25 15:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Feb 25 15:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Feb 25 15:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Feb 25 15:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Feb 26 15:33 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 140K Feb 26 15:33 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 26 15:32 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 103K Feb 26 15:32 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Feb 25 15:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 15:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678237753226

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-08 01:09:14] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-08 01:09:14] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-08 01:09:14] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 53 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:14] [INFO ] Transformed 553 places.
[2023-03-08 01:09:14] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:09:14] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 553 places and 150 transitions and 600 arcs in 114 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 444 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 444 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 64 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 150/150 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 99 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 99 transition count 136
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 98 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 98 transition count 135
Applied a total of 26 rules in 142 ms. Remains 98 /109 variables (removed 11) and now considering 135/150 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 98 cols
[2023-03-08 01:09:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 10 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 553 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:09:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:09:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 61 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:09:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1253 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:09:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:09:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 87 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/109 places, 135/150 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1484 ms. Remains : 98/109 places, 135/150 transitions.
Support contains 64 out of 98 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-08 01:09:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2297 resets, run finished after 330 ms. (steps per millisecond=30 ) properties (out of 58) seen :24
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 114 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 60 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 93 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 107 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 111 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 87 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 91 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 91 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 34 properties.
[2023-03-08 01:09:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:09:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:09:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:09:18] [INFO ] After 130ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:33
[2023-03-08 01:09:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:09:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:09:19] [INFO ] After 376ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :29
[2023-03-08 01:09:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 61 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:09:19] [INFO ] After 427ms SMT Verify possible using 61 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :29
[2023-03-08 01:09:20] [INFO ] After 958ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :29
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 414 ms.
[2023-03-08 01:09:20] [INFO ] After 1915ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :29
Fused 34 Parikh solutions to 29 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 168 ms.
Support contains 33 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 89 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 89 transition count 118
Applied a total of 18 rules in 13 ms. Remains 89 /98 variables (removed 9) and now considering 118/135 (removed 17) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 13 ms. Remains : 89/98 places, 118/135 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2291 resets, run finished after 126 ms. (steps per millisecond=79 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 60 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 92 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 107 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 114 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 98 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 27) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 25) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 4773 steps, run visited all 25 properties in 79 ms. (steps per millisecond=60 )
Probabilistic random walk after 4773 steps, saw 2306 distinct states, run finished after 79 ms. (steps per millisecond=60 ) properties seen :25
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 18 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 328 edges and 98 vertex of which 97 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 79 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 79 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 79 transition count 100
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 72 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 72 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 72 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 71 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 71 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 70 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 70 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 69 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 69 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 69 transition count 84
Applied a total of 64 rules in 13 ms. Remains 69 /98 variables (removed 29) and now considering 84/135 (removed 51) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 69 cols
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 169 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 284 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 56 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/98 places, 84/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 354 ms. Remains : 69/98 places, 84/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7137858015525548571.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8369525164850892673.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7137858015525548571.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8369525164850892673.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.14364e+06,1.46678,50880,2,9528,5,180572,6,0,360,189214,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG(AX((((s1<1)||(l488<1))&&((s1<1)||(l486<1))))) * ((s1<1)||(l504<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG(!(EX(!((((s1<1)||(l488<1))&&((s1<1)||(l486<1))))))) * ((s1<1)||(l504<1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t50, t51, t52, t53, t56, t57, t58, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t6...331
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,13.1285,369588,1,0,301,1.96998e+06,198,149,2555,1.95306e+06,318
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 81 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 81 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 81 transition count 104
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 75 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 75 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 75 transition count 96
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 73 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 73 transition count 92
Applied a total of 54 rules in 9 ms. Remains 73 /98 variables (removed 25) and now considering 92/135 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 73 cols
[2023-03-08 01:09:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:09:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:09:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:09:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:09:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:09:35] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 48 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/98 places, 92/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 186 ms. Remains : 73/98 places, 92/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:09:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:09:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2148887674196001813.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:09:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4464905212489484140.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2148887674196001813.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4464905212489484140.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.74581e+06,2.56309,87408,2,14499,5,335154,6,0,384,299967,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(TRUE) U EX((E(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))) U (((!((s1>=1)&&(l486>=1)))||((p17>=1)&&(l126>=1)))||((s1>=1)&&(l340>=1)))) * ((AF(((s1>=1)&&...224
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX((E(!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))))) U (((!((s1>=1)&&(l486>=1)))||((p17>=1)&&(l126>=1)))||((s1>...721
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t58, t59, t60, t61, t6...381
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,29.7217,838536,1,0,461,4.72351e+06,225,221,2745,4.25264e+06,513
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 80 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 80 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 80 transition count 101
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 71 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 71 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 71 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 70 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 70 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 69 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 69 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 68 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 68 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 68 transition count 84
Applied a total of 64 rules in 18 ms. Remains 68 /98 variables (removed 30) and now considering 84/135 (removed 51) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 68 cols
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 42 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/98 places, 84/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 180 ms. Remains : 68/98 places, 84/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9211720547375015647.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3355309074689213048.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9211720547375015647.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3355309074689213048.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64336e+06,1.17703,47956,2,11330,5,169905,6,0,356,175215,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((A((!(((AG(((s1>=1)&&(l133>=1))) * (s8>=1)) * (l151>=1))) + EG(((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1)))) U ((p32>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + E(EG(((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1...251
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(EG(((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))) * (s1>=1)) * (l127>=1))) U (EX(((s1>=1)&&(l338>...544
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t11, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35, t56, t6...366
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 56/0/28
(forward)formula 0,0,5.24119,161060,1,0,199,722992,208,77,2551,699397,210
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 79 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 79 transition count 98
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 71 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 71 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 71 transition count 88
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 69 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 69 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 68 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 68 transition count 82
Applied a total of 62 rules in 8 ms. Remains 68 /98 variables (removed 30) and now considering 82/135 (removed 53) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 68 cols
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/98 places, 82/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 186 ms. Remains : 68/98 places, 82/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9097883501055904655.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16585355398401736597.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9097883501055904655.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16585355398401736597.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.96013e+06,1.48832,54080,2,9515,5,226665,6,0,354,171530,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(A((((!((p19>=1)&&(l126>=1)))||((s1>=1)&&(l91>=1)))||((s1>=1)&&(l503>=1))) U !(AF(((p29>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) + (EG(((s1<1)||(l496<1)))...183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(!((E(!(!(!(EG(!(((p29>=1)&&(l0>=1))))))) U (!((((!((p19>=1)&&(l126>=1)))||((s1>=1)&&(l91>=1)))||(...325
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t50, t53, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t6...321
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,12.7386,374244,1,0,390,1.93631e+06,209,181,2587,1.56404e+06,592
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 77 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 77 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 77 transition count 94
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 69 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 69 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 69 transition count 84
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 67 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 67 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 80
Applied a total of 67 rules in 10 ms. Remains 67 /98 variables (removed 31) and now considering 80/135 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 67 cols
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 46 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/98 places, 80/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 181 ms. Remains : 67/98 places, 80/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8622535006966328828.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12437024663038948053.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8622535006966328828.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12437024663038948053.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91538e+06,3.07504,84052,2,11533,5,321553,6,0,348,276498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EF((EG(((p36>=1)&&(l137>=1))) * AG(((s1>=1)&&(l484>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (EG(((p36>=1)&&(l137>=1))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l484>=1)))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t49, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t6...306
(forward)formula 0,0,6.51945,119280,1,0,163,527869,189,65,2479,421001,182
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 77 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 77 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 77 transition count 96
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 68 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 68 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 65 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 65 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 63 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 61 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 61 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 60 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 60 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 60 transition count 68
Applied a total of 84 rules in 19 ms. Remains 60 /98 variables (removed 38) and now considering 68/135 (removed 67) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 60 cols
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 36 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/98 places, 68/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 180 ms. Remains : 60/98 places, 68/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9889823546770603834.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16026351834699790121.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9889823546770603834.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16026351834699790121.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,917228,0.538742,26228,2,7629,5,88184,6,0,308,90557,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((s1<1)||(l488<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l488<1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t41, t42, t43, t44, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t5...301
(forward)formula 0,1,2.11125,73040,1,0,140,303068,157,55,2089,262208,146
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 77 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 77 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 77 transition count 96
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 69 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 69 transition count 88
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 67 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 67 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 66 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 65 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 65 transition count 82
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 65 transition count 80
Applied a total of 69 rules in 12 ms. Remains 65 /98 variables (removed 33) and now considering 80/135 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 65 cols
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 38 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/98 places, 80/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 186 ms. Remains : 65/98 places, 80/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability556134269827462271.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12466069787982977882.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability556134269827462271.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12466069787982977882.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.70106e+06,0.800435,33100,2,7095,5,120815,6,0,340,118408,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG(EF(((s1<1)||(l124<1)))) * (p14>=1)) * ((l156>=1) * (((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1)) + (AG(((s1>=1)&&(l338>=1))) * (E(((p18>=1)&&(l115>=1)) U...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l124<1)))))) * (p14>=1)) * ((l156>=1) * (((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1)) + (...281
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t45, t46, t47, t53, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t6...316
(forward)formula 0,0,3.57752,105316,1,0,177,444948,196,73,2474,435883,205
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 78 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 78 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 78 transition count 97
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 70 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 70 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 87
Applied a total of 59 rules in 3 ms. Remains 70 /98 variables (removed 28) and now considering 87/135 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 70 cols
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 62 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/98 places, 87/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 218 ms. Remains : 70/98 places, 87/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3811685641245450037.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10463336726909932017.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3811685641245450037.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10463336726909932017.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.23325e+06,2.49551,82304,2,11291,5,300450,6,0,367,298118,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX((((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1)) + ((((EF(((s1>=1)&&(l502>=1))) + (p19<1)) + (l126<1)) * (s8>=1)) * (l151>=1)))) * EX(EF(EG(((s1<1)||(l510<1))...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1)) + ((((E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l502>=1))) + (p19<1)) + (...229
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t51, t54, t55, t56, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t7...326
(forward)formula 0,0,13.9885,365756,1,0,236,1.81865e+06,209,102,2636,1.4747e+06,268
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 77 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 77 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 77 transition count 98
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 67 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 67 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 67 transition count 86
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 65 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 65 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 65 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 64 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 64 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 63 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 63 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 76
Applied a total of 76 rules in 11 ms. Remains 63 /98 variables (removed 35) and now considering 76/135 (removed 59) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 63 cols
[2023-03-08 01:10:50] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:10:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:10:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:10:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:10:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:50] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 40 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/98 places, 76/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 189 ms. Remains : 63/98 places, 76/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8987048506193880380.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12106941705097707630.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8987048506193880380.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12106941705097707630.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.17032e+06,0.795001,33460,2,7559,5,115656,6,0,328,122527,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(!(EG((!(((p16>=1)&&(l115>=1))) + AG(((s1>=1)&&(l7>=1)))))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!(EG((!(((p16>=1)&&(l115>=1))) + !(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l7>=1)))))))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))))] !=...161
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t50, t55, t56, t57, t5...341
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,8.60067,270344,1,0,289,1.42458e+06,192,144,2310,1.3103e+06,313
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 83 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 83 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 83 transition count 106
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 81 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 81 transition count 104
Applied a total of 37 rules in 3 ms. Remains 81 /98 variables (removed 17) and now considering 104/135 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 81 cols
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 51 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/98 places, 104/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 220 ms. Remains : 81/98 places, 104/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16762564852980134458.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:10:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13053882363832435658.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16762564852980134458.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13053882363832435658.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.39584e+06,3.81632,123540,2,11051,5,527810,6,0,428,356552,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EF(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l485>=1)))) + EG(AF(((p18>=1)&&(l115>=1))))) U (!(EF(((p29>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) * (((A(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))) U ((s1>=1)...355
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(((FwdU(Init,(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l485>=1)))))) + EG(!(EG(!(((p18>=1)&&(l115>=1)))))))) * !(E(TRUE U ...1367
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t48, t49, t50, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t66, t67, t68, t75, t76, t7...391
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 01:11:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-08 01:11:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 01:11:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15776997849675841664.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15776997849675841664.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15776997849675841664.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15776997849675841664.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15776997849675841664.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 01:11:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 01:11:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 01:11:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 103 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:11:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2023-03-08 01:11:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 78 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2023-03-08 01:11:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8880780270284869888.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:11:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9238128745676657895.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8880780270284869888.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9238128745676657895.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.39584e+06,12.6735,231008,2036,944,199133,13009,322,1.62837e+06,109,96308,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EF(AX(((i2.u0.s1>=1)&&(i3.u1.l485>=1)))) + EG(AF(((i3.u8.p18>=1)&&(i5.u13.l115>=1))))) U (!(EF(((i5.u2.p29>=1)&&(i2.u0.l0>=1)))) * (((...506
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(((FwdU(Init,(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((i2.u0.s1>=1)&&(i3.u1.l485>=1)))))) + EG(!(EG(!(((i3.u8.p18>=1)&&(i5.u13.l115...1778
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t9, t28, t48, t49, t50, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t66, t67, t68, t75, t76, t79, t80, t...375
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 77 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 77 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 77 transition count 96
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 68 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 68 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 66 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 66 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 66 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 65 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 64 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 64 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 64 transition count 75
Applied a total of 74 rules in 18 ms. Remains 64 /98 variables (removed 34) and now considering 75/135 (removed 60) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 64 cols
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 47 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/98 places, 75/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 225 ms. Remains : 64/98 places, 75/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5335962864748964040.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14563041198875446002.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5335962864748964040.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14563041198875446002.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.6756e+06,1.04944,39984,2,6949,5,151395,6,0,331,143816,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l124>=1)))) * EF(((s1>=1)&&(l502>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l124>=1))))))),TRUE) * ((s1>=1)&&(l502>=1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t45, t48, t49, t50, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t6...311
(forward)formula 0,0,2.5275,71924,1,0,151,330035,173,59,2258,261731,161
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 78 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 78 transition count 101
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 68 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 68 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 68 transition count 89
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 65 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 65 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 65 transition count 82
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 63 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 63 transition count 79
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 61 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 61 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 61 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 60 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 60 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 60 transition count 72
Applied a total of 83 rules in 26 ms. Remains 60 /98 variables (removed 38) and now considering 72/135 (removed 63) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 60 cols
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 53 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/98 places, 72/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 196 ms. Remains : 60/98 places, 72/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1041816541008356650.gal : 0 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7431524790133180253.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1041816541008356650.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7431524790133180253.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,634628,0.446643,22732,2,7309,5,71171,6,0,312,70063,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((!((((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)) + EG(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l123>=1)))))) * (s4>=1)) * (l0>=1)) U (E((!(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1)))) + AX(((s1>=1)&&(l0>=...269
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((E((!(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1)))))) + !(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) U (E(TRUE U (((s1>=1)&&(l...754
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t46, t52, t53, t54, t5...336
(forward)formula 0,1,8.32329,260688,1,0,464,1.34091e+06,191,204,2153,1.29019e+06,557
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 80 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 80 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 80 transition count 99
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 71 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 71 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 71 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 70 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 70 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 86
Applied a total of 59 rules in 20 ms. Remains 70 /98 variables (removed 28) and now considering 86/135 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 70 cols
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 40 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/98 places, 86/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 203 ms. Remains : 70/98 places, 86/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14817824748303106077.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13785833087229121987.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14817824748303106077.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13785833087229121987.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.76678e+06,2.29466,76060,2,10874,5,261737,6,0,366,301993,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(!(EX(((!((s1>=1)&&(l504>=1)))&&(((p24>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((p33>=1)&&(l0>=1))))))) U ((p37>=1)&&(l122>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX(!(EX(((!((s1>=1)&&(l504>=1)))&&(((p24>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((p33>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))))) * ((p37>=1)&&(l122...171
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t49, t52, t53, t54, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t7...331
(forward)formula 0,1,12.2623,324764,1,0,395,1.33351e+06,193,221,2586,1.85968e+06,415
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 79 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 79 transition count 104
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 70 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 70 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 70 transition count 93
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 68 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 68 transition count 89
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 66 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 66 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 65 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 65 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 65 transition count 83
Applied a total of 70 rules in 6 ms. Remains 65 /98 variables (removed 33) and now considering 83/135 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 65 cols
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 7 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 37 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/98 places, 83/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 155 ms. Remains : 65/98 places, 83/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11738760288711413173.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12864449485857725058.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11738760288711413173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12864449485857725058.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.77502e+06,1.54143,53888,2,9820,5,199242,6,0,343,193004,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF(((s1<1)||(l355<1))) * EX(((E(((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1)) U ((s2>=1)&&(l497>=1))) + AF(((s4>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1))||((s1...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l355<1))) * EX(((E(((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1)) U ((s2>=1)&&(l497>=1))) + !(EG(!(((s4>=1...407
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t52, t54, t55, t56, t6...356
(forward)formula 0,0,15.4023,425140,1,0,404,2.2986e+06,216,173,2397,2.08839e+06,490
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 78 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 78 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 78 transition count 97
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 69 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 69 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 69 transition count 86
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 66 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 66 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 66 transition count 79
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 64 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 64 transition count 76
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 62 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 62 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 62 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 61 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 61 transition count 71
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 61 transition count 69
Applied a total of 82 rules in 19 ms. Remains 61 /98 variables (removed 37) and now considering 69/135 (removed 66) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 61 cols
[2023-03-08 01:12:39] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:12:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:12:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:12:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:12:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:12:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:12:40] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 37 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/98 places, 69/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 171 ms. Remains : 61/98 places, 69/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:12:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:12:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8704334252944897639.gal : 0 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2269037342213769289.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8704334252944897639.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2269037342213769289.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,924721,0.796742,31692,2,9259,5,105352,6,0,313,118404,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((EG(AF(((s1<1)||(l488<1)))) + EG(((s1>=1)&&(l37>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((EG(!(EG(!(((s1<1)||(l488<1)))))) + EG(((s1>=1)&&(l37>=1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t11, t19, t29, t42, t43, t44, t45, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t5...311
(forward)formula 0,1,8.93509,278656,1,0,333,1.3956e+06,176,139,2156,1.48424e+06,377
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 80 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 80 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 80 transition count 105
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 72 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 72 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 70 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 70 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 70 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 69 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 69 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 68 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 68 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 68 transition count 87
Applied a total of 64 rules in 14 ms. Remains 68 /98 variables (removed 30) and now considering 87/135 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 68 cols
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 46 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/98 places, 87/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 178 ms. Remains : 68/98 places, 87/135 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13073762969955134670.gal : 0 ms
[2023-03-08 01:12:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5991394650901699165.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13073762969955134670.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5991394650901699165.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.21487e+06,1.41025,51024,2,9322,5,181790,6,0,359,189623,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((E(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1)) U A(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))) U (((s1>=1)&&(l353>=1))||((p24>=1)&&(l0>=1))))) + !(A((((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))||((s1>...250
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(E(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1)) U !((E(!((((s1>=1)&&(l353>=1))||((p24>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) U (!(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)...544
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t47, t48, t49, t55, t5...381
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,28.3046,790636,1,0,792,3.65962e+06,221,451,2551,4.78264e+06,877
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2023-03-08 01:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-08 01:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:13:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 01:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13657642975231749679.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13657642975231749679.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13657642975231749679.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13657642975231749679.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13657642975231749679.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 01:13:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 01:13:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 01:13:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 148 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2023-03-08 01:13:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 111 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2023-03-08 01:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9979726910884378869.gal : 11 ms
[2023-03-08 01:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6272715552662802585.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9979726910884378869.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6272715552662802585.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.7964e+07,88.5542,2037476,6779,937,1.40761e+06,121500,364,1.98752e+07,110,887352,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EF(AX(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i6.u15.l485>=1)))) + EG(AF(((i4.u17.p18>=1)&&(i4.u17.l115>=1))))) U (!(EF(((i0.u0.p29>=1)&&(i0.u0.l0>=1)))) * (...504
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(((FwdU(Init,(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i6.u15.l485>=1)))))) + EG(!(EG(!(((i4.u17.p18>=1)&&(i4.u17.l1...1780
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t19, t25, t73, t74, t75, t77, t78, t79, t88, t89, t90, t99, t100, t102, t103, t104, t...502
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,1,667.491,4557552,1,0,2.17546e+06,162491,976,5.10013e+07,378,1.1345e+06,558185
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Total runtime 911469 ms.

BK_STOP 1678238667150

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r101-tall-167814475100202"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;