Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r101-tall-167814475000194.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r101-tall-167814475000194
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 572K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K Feb 26 15:32 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K Feb 26 15:32 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K Feb 26 15:31 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K Feb 26 15:31 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 15:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Feb 25 15:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Feb 25 15:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Feb 25 15:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 26 15:33 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 108K Feb 26 15:33 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Feb 26 15:33 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Feb 26 15:33 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Feb 25 15:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 15:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678237569687

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 53 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Transformed 553 places.
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 553 places and 150 transitions and 600 arcs in 113 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 444 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 444 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 69 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 150/150 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 99 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 99 transition count 136
Applied a total of 24 rules in 17 ms. Remains 99 /109 variables (removed 10) and now considering 136/150 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 99 cols
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 14 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 190 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 62 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 358 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 79 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/109 places, 136/150 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 455 ms. Remains : 99/109 places, 136/150 transitions.
Support contains 69 out of 99 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
Support contains 68 out of 99 places (down from 69) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2300 resets, run finished after 381 ms. (steps per millisecond=26 ) properties (out of 68) seen :35
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 96 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 102 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 35 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 153 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 99 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 62 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 32 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 33) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 96 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 60 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 121 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 109 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 98 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 107 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 32 properties.
[2023-03-08 01:06:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:06:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:06:12] [INFO ] After 158ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:31
[2023-03-08 01:06:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:06:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:06:13] [INFO ] After 369ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :30
[2023-03-08 01:06:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 62 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:06:13] [INFO ] After 435ms SMT Verify possible using 62 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :30
[2023-03-08 01:06:14] [INFO ] After 1007ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :30
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 425 ms.
[2023-03-08 01:06:14] [INFO ] After 1975ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :30
Fused 32 Parikh solutions to 30 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 6 properties in 191 ms.
Support contains 34 out of 99 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 91 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 91 transition count 128
Applied a total of 16 rules in 14 ms. Remains 91 /99 variables (removed 8) and now considering 128/136 (removed 8) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 14 ms. Remains : 91/99 places, 128/136 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2317 resets, run finished after 176 ms. (steps per millisecond=56 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 113 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 102 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 155 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 24) seen :4
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 96 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 113 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 113 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 20 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 91 cols
[2023-03-08 01:06:15] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 7 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:06:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:06:15] [INFO ] After 176ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:20
[2023-03-08 01:06:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:06:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:06:16] [INFO ] After 232ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :20
[2023-03-08 01:06:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 59 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:06:16] [INFO ] After 271ms SMT Verify possible using 59 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :20
[2023-03-08 01:06:16] [INFO ] After 654ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :20
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 264 ms.
[2023-03-08 01:06:16] [INFO ] After 1278ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :20
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 77 ms.
Support contains 26 out of 91 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 91/91 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 89 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 89 transition count 126
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 88 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 125
Applied a total of 6 rules in 13 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 125/128 (removed 3) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 13 ms. Remains : 88/91 places, 125/128 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2320 resets, run finished after 215 ms. (steps per millisecond=46 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 111 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 150 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 105 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 91 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 99 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 47086 steps, run visited all 19 properties in 191 ms. (steps per millisecond=246 )
Probabilistic random walk after 47086 steps, saw 20230 distinct states, run finished after 195 ms. (steps per millisecond=241 ) properties seen :19
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
Support contains 65 out of 99 places (down from 67) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 18 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 330 edges and 99 vertex of which 98 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 78 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 78 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 78 transition count 95
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 68 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 68 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 83
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 66 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 66 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 65 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 65 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 64 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 64 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 63 transition count 73
Applied a total of 78 rules in 24 ms. Remains 63 /99 variables (removed 36) and now considering 73/136 (removed 63) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 63 cols
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 46 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/99 places, 73/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 206 ms. Remains : 63/99 places, 73/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12882355106520152541.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16375030247990047489.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12882355106520152541.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16375030247990047489.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,269078,0.58827,26016,2,6173,5,82718,6,0,325,84740,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(A(!(((s1>=1)&&(l487>=1))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l342>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((s1>=1)&&(l342>=1)))) * (!(!(((s1>=1)&&(l487>=1)))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l342>=1)))))] != F...219
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1/0/72
(forward)formula 0,1,0.682545,26268,1,0,10,82718,18,3,668,84740,5
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 77 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 77 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 77 transition count 94
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 66 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 81
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 64 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 64 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 64 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 63 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 62 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 62 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 62 transition count 71
Applied a total of 80 rules in 20 ms. Remains 62 /99 variables (removed 37) and now considering 71/136 (removed 65) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 62 cols
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 43 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/99 places, 71/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 211 ms. Remains : 62/99 places, 71/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9397606779237246720.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13324031978244133420.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9397606779237246720.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13324031978244133420.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,232536,0.300164,16616,2,4602,5,53086,6,0,319,47996,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(A(AF(((p16>=1)&&(l115>=1))) U !(EF(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l91>=1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l91>=1))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !...286
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t45, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t6...296
(forward)formula 0,0,1.1806,44048,1,0,148,180108,173,57,2178,147602,162
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 79 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 79 transition count 100
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 69 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 69 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 69 transition count 88
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 67 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 67 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 66 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 65 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 65 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 65 transition count 78
Applied a total of 73 rules in 8 ms. Remains 65 /99 variables (removed 34) and now considering 78/136 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 65 cols
[2023-03-08 01:06:20] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 42 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/99 places, 78/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 188 ms. Remains : 65/99 places, 78/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16753845380550448948.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9553020404144504389.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16753845380550448948.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9553020404144504389.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,321504,0.473637,21936,2,5078,5,73107,6,0,338,65860,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AF((((s2>=1)&&(l496>=1))||((p15>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + ((s0>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + ((EG(E(((s1>=1)&&(l32>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l504>=1)))) * (s8>=1...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((((s2>=1)&&(l496>=1))||((p15>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * ((s0>=1)&&(l0>=1)...269
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t46, t50, t51, t52, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t6...316
(forward)formula 0,0,4.40565,134904,1,0,268,700985,191,115,2292,630269,314
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 80 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 80 transition count 99
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 70 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 89
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 67 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 67 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 67 transition count 82
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 65 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 65 transition count 79
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 63 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 63 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 62 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 62 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 62 transition count 73
Applied a total of 79 rules in 11 ms. Remains 62 /99 variables (removed 37) and now considering 73/136 (removed 63) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 62 cols
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 42 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/99 places, 73/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 171 ms. Remains : 62/99 places, 73/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2513618028570486267.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3654545197075602093.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2513618028570486267.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3654545197075602093.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,172637,0.653719,26972,2,7051,5,91734,6,0,321,82508,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EG(AG(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l37>=1)))))) + EG((EF(((s1<1)||(l353<1))) + AF(((p24>=1)&&(l0>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(EG((E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l353<1))) + !(EG(!(((p24>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))))))) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(...192
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t11, t19, t29, t39, t40, t41, t47, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t5...321
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,6.9292,192640,1,0,287,907575,184,119,2269,893139,410
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 80 transition count 102
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 72 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 72 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 72 transition count 92
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 70 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 70 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 70 transition count 88
Applied a total of 61 rules in 8 ms. Remains 70 /99 variables (removed 29) and now considering 88/136 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 70 cols
[2023-03-08 01:06:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:06:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:06:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:32] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 42 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/99 places, 88/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 188 ms. Remains : 70/99 places, 88/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9883952926653174270.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11562370673100767033.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9883952926653174270.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11562370673100767033.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,499890,1.4364,50252,2,8305,5,217508,6,0,368,131030,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(((AG(((p38<1)||(l136<1))) * (!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l32>=1)))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l335>=1)))) * (EG(((s1>=1)&&(l484>=1))) ...185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ((!(E(TRUE U !(((p38<1)||(l136<1))))) * (!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l32>=1)))...256
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t51, t53, t54, t55, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t7...326
(forward)formula 0,1,10.2582,285216,1,0,350,1.57971e+06,212,160,2596,1.07085e+06,428
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 80 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 80 transition count 101
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 71 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 71 transition count 92
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 69 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 69 transition count 88
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 67 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 67 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 66 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 66 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 82
Applied a total of 69 rules in 11 ms. Remains 66 /99 variables (removed 33) and now considering 82/136 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 66 cols
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/99 places, 82/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 190 ms. Remains : 66/99 places, 82/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6788844711453841560.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17330967218567949242.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6788844711453841560.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17330967218567949242.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,365092,0.646877,26104,2,5212,5,93437,6,0,346,76290,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((((s1<1)||(l354<1))||((s1<1)||(l345<1)))) * EX((EX(((s1<1)||(l488<1))) * ((p18<1)||(l115<1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EG((((s1<1)||(l354<1))||((s1<1)||(l345<1)))))) * ((p18<1)||(l115<1)))) * ((s1<1)||(l...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t43, t44, t45, t52, t53, t54, t55, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t6...331
(forward)formula 0,1,4.95476,150004,1,0,275,775537,188,111,2356,688570,312
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 77 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 77 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 77 transition count 94
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 66 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 81
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 63 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 74
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 61 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 59 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 59 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 59 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 58 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 58 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 58 transition count 64
Applied a total of 90 rules in 12 ms. Remains 58 /99 variables (removed 41) and now considering 64/136 (removed 72) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 40 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/99 places, 64/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 160 ms. Remains : 58/99 places, 64/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12764897927004894781.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13014659723072362968.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12764897927004894781.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13014659723072362968.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,133604,0.295701,15032,2,4969,5,44105,6,0,296,44127,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t40, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t5...286
(forward)formula 0,0,2.88921,90072,1,0,168,381452,153,73,2096,356580,190
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 82 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 82 transition count 107
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 73 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 73 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 73 transition count 96
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 71 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 71 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 70 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 70 transition count 90
Applied a total of 60 rules in 9 ms. Remains 70 /99 variables (removed 29) and now considering 90/136 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 70 cols
[2023-03-08 01:06:51] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:06:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 326 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 364 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:06:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:06:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:06:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 50 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/99 places, 90/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 431 ms. Remains : 70/99 places, 90/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:06:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4227572047319560891.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:06:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1426474864460763026.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4227572047319560891.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1426474864460763026.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,448208,1.35204,47340,2,8426,5,176749,6,0,370,135114,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(!(((AG(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l112>=1)))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1))||((s2>=1)&&(l496>=1))))) U (((A...308
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((((!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l7>=1))))) * !(E(((s1>=1)&&(l497>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l110>=1))))) * (...945
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t11, t19, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t56, t58, t5...381
(forward)formula 0,0,10.1871,267688,1,0,418,1.43739e+06,230,184,2599,1.19829e+06,492
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 82 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 82 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 82 transition count 105
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 74 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 74 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 74 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 73 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 73 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 72 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 72 transition count 92
Applied a total of 57 rules in 14 ms. Remains 72 /99 variables (removed 27) and now considering 92/136 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 48 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/99 places, 92/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 211 ms. Remains : 72/99 places, 92/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17886569775585843798.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability876628670509149401.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17886569775585843798.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability876628670509149401.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,572966,1.62229,57632,2,9452,5,240253,6,0,380,157744,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG(EF((((s1<1)||(l337<1))&&((s1<1)||(l123<1))))) * EF((((((E(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l110>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l492>=1))) + (...251
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG(E(TRUE U (((s1<1)||(l337<1))&&((s1<1)||(l123<1))))) * E(TRUE U (((((E(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)) U ((...314
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t54, t56, t57, t58, t6...376
(forward)formula 0,1,11.1179,286476,1,0,329,1.55472e+06,222,147,2663,1.21181e+06,371
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 82 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 82 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 82 transition count 107
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 74 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 74 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 74 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 73 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 73 transition count 96
Applied a total of 55 rules in 4 ms. Remains 73 /99 variables (removed 26) and now considering 96/136 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 73 cols
[2023-03-08 01:07:13] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:07:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:07:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:07:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:07:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:07:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 69 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/99 places, 96/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 208 ms. Remains : 73/99 places, 96/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:07:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:07:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10472759975866520975.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability822383588112963960.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10472759975866520975.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability822383588112963960.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,652165,1.94219,62928,2,9070,5,233426,6,0,388,182561,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF((((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))) + EG((((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1))))) + ((!((((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))||((s6>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) * A...483
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!((((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))) + EG((((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1))))) + ((!(((...1104
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t53, t54, t55,...399
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,22.3227,586404,1,0,561,3.24839e+06,248,264,2778,2.75597e+06,646
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 80 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 80 transition count 99
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 71 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 71 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 70 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 69 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 69 transition count 87
Applied a total of 61 rules in 9 ms. Remains 69 /99 variables (removed 30) and now considering 87/136 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 69 cols
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/99 places, 87/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 192 ms. Remains : 69/99 places, 87/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9173452154878507281.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8193980882838150810.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9173452154878507281.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8193980882838150810.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,467094,1.05229,39600,2,6839,5,142160,6,0,363,128984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(((!(A(((s1>=1)&&(l36>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1)))) + ((AF(((s1<1)||(l487<1))) * ((s1<1)||(l110<1))) * ((s1<1)||(l337<1)))) + (((s1<...191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),((!(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l36>=1))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1))))) + EG(!(((s...309
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t46, t47, t48, t54, t55, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t7...331
(forward)formula 0,1,10.9563,288812,1,0,517,1.41697e+06,213,290,2537,1.49166e+06,536
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 84 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 84 transition count 111
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 80 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 80 transition count 107
Applied a total of 40 rules in 5 ms. Remains 80 /99 variables (removed 19) and now considering 107/136 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 80 cols
[2023-03-08 01:07:47] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:07:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:07:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:07:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:07:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:07:48] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/99 places, 107/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 211 ms. Remains : 80/99 places, 107/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:07:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:07:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10972369299660374816.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:07:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12903746575650580674.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10972369299660374816.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12903746575650580674.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.17161e+06,1.17524,42408,2,7124,5,162152,6,0,427,109405,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(AF(AX(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l485>=1))))) U ((((!(((p38<1)||(l136<1))) + EG(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))))) + E(AX(((p24>=1)&&(l0>=1))) U (((s1>=1)&&...375
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !(E(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l485>=1))))))))))) U ((((!(((p38<1)||(l136<1))) + EG(!(...466
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t28, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t61, t62, t63, t65, t66, t67,...417
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,16.9638,446476,1,0,646,2.51414e+06,280,337,3162,1.9602e+06,777
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 82 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 82 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 82 transition count 105
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 75 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 75 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 75 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 74 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 74 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 74 transition count 93
Applied a total of 54 rules in 8 ms. Remains 74 /99 variables (removed 25) and now considering 93/136 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 74 cols
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/99 places, 93/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 189 ms. Remains : 74/99 places, 93/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4050187563907656288.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1155058496470619569.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4050187563907656288.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1155058496470619569.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,717140,1.73887,55160,2,10491,5,217009,6,0,389,156071,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(!((((E(!(((s1<1)||(l488<1))) U ((p12>=1)&&(l0>=1))) * AX(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1)))) * (E(((s6>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))) * (s1>...285
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((s5>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) * !(E(!(((s5>=1)&&(l0>=1))) U (!(E(!((((E(!(((s1<1)||(l488<1))) U ((p12>...416
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t24, t29, t46, t47, t48, t53, t54, t55, t56, t59, t60, t61,...379
(forward)formula 0,0,12.3745,302860,1,0,366,1.70033e+06,236,151,2737,1.34662e+06,419
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 78 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 78 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 78 transition count 95
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 68 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 68 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 67 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 82
Applied a total of 67 rules in 2 ms. Remains 67 /99 variables (removed 32) and now considering 82/136 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 67 cols
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/99 places, 82/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 185 ms. Remains : 67/99 places, 82/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3794849432529347869.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6864174605344687377.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3794849432529347869.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6864174605344687377.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,420375,0.551324,24648,2,5275,5,86607,6,0,350,76825,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(A(AF(AX(((p20>=1)&&(l115>=1)))) U ((!(EX(((p10>=1)&&(l153>=1)))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1)))) * ((p35>=1)&&(l136>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(EY((FwdU(EY(Init),!(((!(EX(((p10>=1)&&(l153>=1)))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1)))) * ((p35>=1)&&(l136>=1))))) * ...733
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t51, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t7...306
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,7.46481,199788,1,0,388,971625,197,235,2503,957807,451
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 78 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 78 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 78 transition count 95
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 67 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 67 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 82
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 64 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 64 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 64 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 62 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 62 transition count 72
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 60 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 60 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 60 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 59 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 59 transition count 67
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 59 transition count 65
Applied a total of 88 rules in 20 ms. Remains 59 /99 variables (removed 40) and now considering 65/136 (removed 71) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 59 cols
[2023-03-08 01:08:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:08:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:08:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:08:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:08:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:08:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:08:25] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/99 places, 65/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 206 ms. Remains : 59/99 places, 65/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:08:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:08:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11510088324812698848.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7932608989181623295.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11510088324812698848.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7932608989181623295.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,134054,0.297838,16640,2,5817,5,48008,6,0,301,48180,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((s6>=1)&&(l0>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((s6>=1)&&(l0>=1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t40, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t5...291
(forward)formula 0,0,1.37405,48952,1,0,132,191488,152,54,2042,151947,143
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 82 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 82 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 82 transition count 107
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 74 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 74 transition count 99
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 71 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 71 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 71 transition count 92
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 69 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 69 transition count 89
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 67 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 67 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 66 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 66 transition count 83
Applied a total of 71 rules in 11 ms. Remains 66 /99 variables (removed 33) and now considering 83/136 (removed 53) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 66 cols
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 46 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/99 places, 83/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 175 ms. Remains : 66/99 places, 83/136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8876063040446975827.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability810122034973661687.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8876063040446975827.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability810122034973661687.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,263867,1.18359,44320,2,9537,5,164540,6,0,347,130934,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((((!(A((((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l114>=1))) U !(((s1>=1)&&(l1>=1))))) * AG(((s1<1)||(l36<1)))) + AG(((p29>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + A...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((EY(Init) * !(!((E(!(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1>=1)))) U (!((((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l114>=1)))) * !(!(((s1>=...444
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t44,...394
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1/0/82
(forward)formula 0,1,9.01905,235820,1,0,247,1.07474e+06,211,100,2475,957251,272
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2023-03-08 01:08:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:08:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Total runtime 145655 ms.

BK_STOP 1678237720789

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r101-tall-167814475000194"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;