fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r053-tajo-167813705300323
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of LoLa+red for BusinessProcesses-PT-09

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
316.936 34699.00 50194.00 541.60 F normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r053-tajo-167813705300323.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool lolaxred
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-09, examination is StableMarking
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r053-tajo-167813705300323
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 536K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K Feb 25 16:48 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K Feb 25 16:48 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K Feb 25 16:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K Feb 25 16:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 15:38 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Feb 25 15:38 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Feb 25 15:39 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Feb 25 15:39 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 25 16:49 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 110K Feb 25 16:49 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K Feb 25 16:49 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K Feb 25 16:49 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Feb 25 15:39 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 15:39 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 104K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

FORMULA_NAME StableMarking

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1679000312948

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=lolaxred
BK_EXAMINATION=StableMarking
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-09
Applying reductions before tool lola
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-16 20:58:35] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StableMarking, -timeout, 180, -rebuildPNML]
[2023-03-16 20:58:35] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-16 20:58:35] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 62 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:35] [INFO ] Transformed 403 places.
[2023-03-16 20:58:35] [INFO ] Transformed 374 transitions.
[2023-03-16 20:58:35] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2023-03-16 20:58:35] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 403 places and 374 transitions and 1148 arcs in 138 ms.
Graph (trivial) has 227 edges and 403 vertex of which 7 / 403 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Structural test allowed to assert that 124 places are NOT stable. Took 12 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 7 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 117 resets, run finished after 507 ms. (steps per millisecond=19 ) properties (out of 279) seen :68
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 100 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 100 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=25 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 100 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 100 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=16 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 100 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 100 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 100 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 100 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 100 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 101 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 100 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 211) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 211 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 367 rows 397 cols
[2023-03-16 20:58:36] [INFO ] Computed 65 place invariants in 20 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:37] [INFO ] After 1663ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:211
[2023-03-16 20:58:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 35 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2023-03-16 20:58:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 35 positive and 30 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2023-03-16 20:58:42] [INFO ] After 2243ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :211
[2023-03-16 20:58:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-16 20:58:44] [INFO ] After 2367ms SMT Verify possible using 1 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :211
[2023-03-16 20:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 143 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 94 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 113 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 91 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 90 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:45] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 616 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 132 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 109 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:45] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 301 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 134 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 102 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 103 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:46] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 431 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 95 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 121 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:46] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 276 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 59 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 78 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 87 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 207 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 111 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 136 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 113 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 101 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 95 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:48] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 373 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 133 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 97 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 78 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 98 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 84 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 131 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 120 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 95 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 93 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 84 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 120 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 110 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 123 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 105 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 111 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 102 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 92 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 92 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 117 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 91 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 82 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 124 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 107 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 105 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 133 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 107 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 114 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 99 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 127 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 126 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 121 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 139 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 95 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 107 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 111 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 106 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 105 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 128 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 114 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 85 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 79 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 108 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 81 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 82 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 107 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 115 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 90 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 128 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 106 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 125 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 95 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 125 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 101 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 101 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 119 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 92 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 103 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 105 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 80 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 81 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 108 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 118 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 95 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 103 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:58] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 74/73 trap constraints in 9496 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:58] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 77 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:59] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 7/6 trap constraints in 525 ms
[2023-03-16 20:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 120 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 83 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 87 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 87 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 87 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 85 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 92 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 96 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 85 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 118 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 87 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 79 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 80 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 71 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 87 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 74 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 75 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 68 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 68 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 71 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 71 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 77 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 82 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 83 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 86 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 84 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 95 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 83 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-16 20:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 70 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close...
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTUtils.execAndCheckResult(SMTUtils.java:251)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.refineWithTraps(DeadlockTester.java:1255)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.refineResultsWithTraps(DeadlockTester.java:736)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.verifyPossible(DeadlockTester.java:656)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.testUnreachableWithSMTIncremental(DeadlockTester.java:350)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.testUnreachableWithSMT(DeadlockTester.java:223)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.ReachabilitySolver.applyReductions(ReachabilitySolver.java:95)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.global.GlobalPropertySolver.applyReachabilitySolver(GlobalPropertySolver.java:724)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.global.GlobalPropertySolver.solveProperty(GlobalPropertySolver.java:558)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.global.GlobalPropertySolver.preSolveLiveness(GlobalPropertySolver.java:412)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.global.GlobalPropertySolver.preStableMarking(GlobalPropertySolver.java:321)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.global.GlobalPropertySolver.solveProperty(GlobalPropertySolver.java:294)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:386)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:178)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:45)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:203)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:136)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:104)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:402)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:659)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:596)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1467)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1440)
[2023-03-16 20:59:02] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :SMT solver raised an error when submitting script.... while checking expressions.
[2023-03-16 20:59:02] [INFO ] After 25058ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:211
Fused 211 Parikh solutions to 204 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 193 properties in 4429 ms.
Support contains 18 out of 397 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 397/397 places, 367/367 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 837 edges and 397 vertex of which 395 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 77 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 77 transitions
Performed 77 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 77
Iterating post reduction 0 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 395 transition count 288
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 318 transition count 288
Performed 59 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 59 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 318 transition count 229
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 249 transition count 229
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 322 place count 211 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 360 place count 211 transition count 191
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 360 place count 211 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 208 transition count 188
Performed 64 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 496 place count 142 transition count 124
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 498 place count 141 transition count 127
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 500 place count 141 transition count 125
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 502 place count 139 transition count 125
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 503 place count 139 transition count 125
Applied a total of 503 rules in 89 ms. Remains 139 /397 variables (removed 258) and now considering 125/367 (removed 242) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 90 ms. Remains : 139/397 places, 125/367 transitions.
Finished random walk after 180 steps, including 11 resets, run visited all 18 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=60 )
Able to resolve query StableMarking after proving 281 properties.
FORMULA StableMarking FALSE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK PARIKH_WALK MARKED_SUFFIX_TEST TRIVIAL_UNMARKED_SCC_TEST TOPOLOGICAL
Total runtime 32143 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout

BK_STOP 1679000347647

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StableMarking -timeout 180 -rebuildPNML

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-09"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StableMarking"
export BK_TOOL="lolaxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool lolaxred"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-09, examination is StableMarking"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r053-tajo-167813705300323"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-09.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-09 execution
cd execution
if [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StableMarking" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StableMarking.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property StableMarking.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "StableMarking.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' StableMarking.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StableMarking"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;