Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r037-tajo-167813689800010.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r037-tajo-167813689800010
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 628K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K Feb 25 12:04 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K Feb 25 12:04 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K Feb 25 12:03 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K Feb 25 12:03 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K Feb 25 15:35 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Feb 25 15:35 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.8K Feb 25 15:35 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Feb 25 15:35 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Feb 25 12:09 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 172K Feb 25 12:09 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Feb 25 12:08 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K Feb 25 12:08 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Feb 25 15:35 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Feb 25 15:35 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678315855398

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-08 22:50:57] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-08 22:50:57] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-08 22:50:57] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2023-03-08 22:50:57] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2023-03-08 22:50:57] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 480 ms
[2023-03-08 22:50:57] [INFO ] Imported 15 HL places and 11 HL transitions for a total of 48 PT places and 5438.0 transition bindings in 20 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
[2023-03-08 22:50:57] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 15 places and 11 transitions 56 arcs in 4 ms.
[2023-03-08 22:50:57] [INFO ] Skeletonized 2 HLPN properties in 1 ms. Removed 14 properties that had guard overlaps.
Computed a total of 12 stabilizing places and 6 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 51 edges and 15 vertex of which 13 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Remains 1 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 6 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 22 edges and 12 vertex of which 10 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Finished random walk after 31 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 )
[2023-03-08 22:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-08 22:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Arc [13:1*[(MOD (ADD $cpt 1) 11)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort compteur
Arc [1:1*[(MOD (ADD $cA 1) 11)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort voitureA
Arc [6:1*[(MOD (ADD (MOD (MINUS $cB 1) 11) 11) 11)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort voitureB
Arc [14:1*[(MOD (ADD $s 1) 2)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort sens
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 48 places and 288 transitions 2090 arcs in 27 ms.
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 46 out of 48 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 48/48 places, 288/288 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 46 transition count 288
Applied a total of 2 rules in 13 ms. Remains 46 /48 variables (removed 2) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 8 ms
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 368 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:50:58] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 144 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/48 places, 288/288 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 681 ms. Remains : 46/48 places, 288/288 transitions.
Support contains 46 out of 46 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-08 22:50:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 74 ms
[2023-03-08 22:50:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
[2023-03-08 22:51:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10001 steps, including 110 resets, run finished after 702 ms. (steps per millisecond=14 ) properties (out of 41) seen :37
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 276 ms. (steps per millisecond=36 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 284 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 221 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 190 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 4 properties.
[2023-03-08 22:51:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:51:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:51:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 22:51:02] [INFO ] After 88ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :3 sat :0 real:1
[2023-03-08 22:51:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 22:51:02] [INFO ] After 44ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :0
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2023-03-08 22:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2023-03-08 22:51:02] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2023-03-08 22:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 85 ms
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
Computed a total of 29 stabilizing places and 44 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 28 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 262 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned [27]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 470 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5279897775876545144.gal : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 22:51:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4831257946561463345.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5279897775876545144.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4831257946561463345.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.69604,56176,2,25472,5,112191,6,0,470,88805,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(A(((((AF((((((((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_2>=1))||((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_3>=1)))||(((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_0>=1))||((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(C...12513
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((CONTROLEUR_1>=1)&&(COMPTE...31831
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t25, t56, t57, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t70,...1304
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 22:51:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2023-03-08 22:51:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 22:51:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12593310013548680203.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12593310013548680203.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12593310013548680203.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12593310013548680203.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12593310013548680203.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 22:51:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 22:51:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 22:51:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 339 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:51:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 170 ms
[2023-03-08 22:51:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 86 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2023-03-08 22:51:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14930467291391156249.gal : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 22:51:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2966093069459559341.ctl : 14 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14930467291391156249.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2966093069459559341.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,15.9883,255084,2542,4380,188624,27530,161,783345,300,2.9511e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(A(((((AF((((((((i1.u1.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(u3.COMPTEUR_2>=1))||((i1.u1.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(u3.COMPTEUR_3>=1)))||(((i1.u1.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(u3.COMPTEU...14583
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((u3.CONTROLEUR_1>=1)...36595
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t50, t56, t104, t112, t126, t134, u3.t170, u3.t171, u3.t172, u3.t173, u3.t...1048
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:52:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:52:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 206 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 129 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 484 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2891370598402335631.gal : 14 ms
[2023-03-08 22:52:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11590845395770488699.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2891370598402335631.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11590845395770488699.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,6.61176,163980,2,38743,5,312668,6,0,474,355666,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX((SUR_PONT_B_0>=1)) U (((((AF((((((AX((SUR_PONT_B_0>=1)) + ((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(ROUTE_A_0>=1))) + (((NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(ROUTE_A_0...31577
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((((!(EG(!((((((!(EX(!((SUR_PONT_B_0>=1)))) + ((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(ROUTE_A_0>=1))) + (((NB_A...94796
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t25, t56, t57, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t70,...1304
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 22:52:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2023-03-08 22:52:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 22:52:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9759088529422763822.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9759088529422763822.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9759088529422763822.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9759088529422763822.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9759088529422763822.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 22:52:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 22:52:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 22:52:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 563 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:52:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 61 ms
[2023-03-08 22:52:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 126 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2023-03-08 22:52:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6441268525259472132.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 22:52:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17262581658325855749.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6441268525259472132.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17262581658325855749.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.04416,42988,1345,984,49022,9000,173,168030,134,82074,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX((i0.u0.SUR_PONT_B_0>=1)) U (((((AF((((((AX((i0.u0.SUR_PONT_B_0>=1)) + ((i1.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i0.u1.ROUTE_A_0>=1))) + (((i1.u4....40391
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((((!(EG(!((((((!(EX(!((i0.u0.SUR_PONT_B_0>=1)))) + ((i1.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i0.u1.ROUTE_A...121226
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t84, t90, t194, t200, i0.u0.t11, i0.u0.t24, i1.t277, i1.t269, i1.t57,...254
(forward)formula 0,1,28.8472,315628,1,0,369929,41269,2341,1.92551e+06,905,236824,338683
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:53:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:53:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 216 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned [13]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 330 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13690187873357251234.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 22:53:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability875146005770967810.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13690187873357251234.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability875146005770967810.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,0.473771,20912,2,8048,5,37424,6,0,470,30355,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EF(((((((((((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||(((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_8>=1))&&(...21606
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||...40674
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t25, t56, t57, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t70,...1304
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 22:53:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2023-03-08 22:53:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 22:53:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14378344713082652586.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14378344713082652586.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14378344713082652586.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14378344713082652586.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14378344713082652586.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 22:53:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 22:53:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 22:53:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 570 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:53:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
[2023-03-08 22:53:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 125 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2023-03-08 22:53:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10230042737260026644.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 22:53:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6583235115402886360.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10230042737260026644.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6583235115402886360.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.96728,45852,1346,714,53482,7075,169,168587,130,75637,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EF(((((((((((i0.u0.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i2.u3.ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i1.u4.CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||(((i0.u0.CAPACITE_...27660
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((((i0.u0.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i2.u3.ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i1...52008
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t89, t90, t254, t255, i0.u0.t11, i0.u0.t24, i1.t200, i1.t196, i1.t57,...254
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 30 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:54:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:54:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:54:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 136 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:54:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:54:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:54:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 22:54:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:54:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:54:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 22:54:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned [27]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 284 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:54:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-08 22:54:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 22:54:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:54:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 22:54:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 22:54:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9233399404117396808.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 22:54:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6568987444890318665.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9233399404117396808.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6568987444890318665.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.01133,56284,2,25472,5,112191,6,0,470,88805,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EG((((((((CHOIX_0<1)||(COMPTEUR_2<1))&&((CHOIX_0<1)||(COMPTEUR_3<1)))&&(((CHOIX_0<1)||(COMPTEUR_0<1))&&((CHOIX_0<1)||(COMPTEUR_1<1)))...12518
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(EG((((((((CHOIX_0<1)||(COMPTEUR_2<1))&&((CHOIX_0<1)||(COMPTEUR_3<1)))&&(((CHOIX_0<...12741
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t25, t56, t57, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t70,...1304
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 22:54:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-03-08 22:54:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 22:54:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4354649340601403789.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4354649340601403789.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4354649340601403789.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4354649340601403789.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4354649340601403789.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 22:54:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 22:54:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 22:54:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 340 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:54:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2023-03-08 22:54:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 88 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2023-03-08 22:54:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2811746115211835788.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 22:54:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3006294057674531373.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2811746115211835788.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3006294057674531373.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,23.2937,338132,2403,4439,312107,30743,151,1.4908e+06,298,2.99247e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EG((((((((i0.u1.CHOIX_0<1)||(u3.COMPTEUR_2<1))&&((i0.u1.CHOIX_0<1)||(u3.COMPTEUR_3<1)))&&(((i0.u1.CHOIX_0<1)||(u3.COMPTEUR_0<1))&&((i...14627
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(EG((((((((i0.u1.CHOIX_0<1)||(u3.COMPTEUR_2<1))&&((i0.u1.CHOIX_0<1)||(u3.COMPTEUR_3...14044
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:213)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 161 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned [13, 27]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 331 ms. Remains : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5935895321893071579.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 22:55:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13643689369196620517.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5935895321893071579.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13643689369196620517.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,5.64023,105928,2,24821,5,208874,6,0,466,214668,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EG(((E(!(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((CONTROLEUR_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENT...29048
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((CONTROLEUR_...48183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t25, t56, t57, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t70,...1304
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 22:55:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2023-03-08 22:55:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 22:55:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5263590605196986842.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5263590605196986842.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5263590605196986842.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5263590605196986842.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5263590605196986842.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 22:55:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 22:55:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 22:55:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 551 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:55:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
[2023-03-08 22:55:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 97 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-08 22:55:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9355988776667528886.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 22:55:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11225710946339756002.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9355988776667528886.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11225710946339756002.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,7.54612,114756,2776,1135,95871,20844,160,559117,140,384471,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EG(((E(!(((((((((((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_0>=1)&&(i0.u0.COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((i0.u4....36074
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((((u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(u2.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((u2.CO...58509
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t57, t135, t145, t190, t200, i0.t68, i0.t67, i0.t56, i2.u1.t11, i2.u1.t24,...254
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 148 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 114 ms returned [13, 27]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 214 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 370 ms. Remains : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8485015352243832103.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 22:56:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12457142197959246495.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8485015352243832103.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12457142197959246495.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,4.61265,105932,2,24821,5,208874,6,0,466,214668,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EX(((EG((((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1)))) * EG((SUR_PONT_A_0>=1))) * E((SUR_PONT_B_0>=1) U ((((...604
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((EG((((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1)))) *...668
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t25, t56, t57, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t70,...1304
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 22:56:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-08 22:56:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 22:56:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16523175367736001547.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16523175367736001547.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16523175367736001547.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16523175367736001547.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16523175367736001547.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 22:56:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 22:56:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 22:56:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 493 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:56:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2023-03-08 22:56:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 58 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2023-03-08 22:56:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability888379106126028067.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 22:56:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1833808281671490735.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability888379106126028067.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1833808281671490735.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.03566,40024,720,977,30581,20794,90,68909,130,393085,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EX(((EG((((u0.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(u1.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((u0.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(u1.COMPTEUR_10>=1)))) * EG((u0.SUR_PONT_A_0>=1))) * E((u0.SUR_P...688
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((EG((((u0.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(u1.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((u0.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(u1.COMPTEUR...752
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t57, t86, t90, t196, t200, u0.t11, u0.t24, Intersection with reachab...227
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,27.3204,541556,1,0,404212,193842,522,1.47164e+06,821,6.89389e+06,190765
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:57:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2023-03-08 22:57:05] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 465 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned [13, 26]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 619 ms. Remains : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11430081310271685016.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3366203312300208048.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11430081310271685016.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3366203312300208048.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,164516,3.15653,87832,2,18911,5,172341,6,0,461,171756,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((AF((((((((((SUR_PONT_B_0>=1)||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((CONTROLEUR_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_0>=1))))||((((NB_ATTENTE_...28952
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((((((((((SUR_PONT_B_0>=1)||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((CONTRO...29019
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t23, t24, t55, t56, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t69, t70,...1358
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 22:57:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 22:57:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7061786388836383040.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7061786388836383040.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7061786388836383040.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7061786388836383040.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7061786388836383040.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 22:57:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 22:57:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 22:57:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 551 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:57:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 97 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2023-03-08 22:57:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12556025926132091606.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7985897354726227169.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12556025926132091606.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7985897354726227169.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,164516,2.0432,75148,875,1097,91939,28540,157,387912,139,187189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((AF((((((((((i1.u3.SUR_PONT_B_0>=1)||(((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((i2.u4.CONTROLEUR_1>=1)&&(i2.u2.COMP...36017
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((((((((((i1.u3.SUR_PONT_B_0>=1)||(((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_...36084
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t55, t88, t89, t198, t199, t277, t280, t283, t285, i1.u3.t23, i2.t276, i2....267
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,17.4228,426616,1,0,545594,123356,1977,2.65062e+06,912,821581,394274
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 147 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 100 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 427 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3510689383940432088.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 22:57:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9632338990496720351.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3510689383940432088.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9632338990496720351.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,8.91137,162924,2,38743,5,312668,6,0,474,355666,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((AF(((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8<1)||(ROUTE_A_0<1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_A_7<1)||(ROUTE_A_0<1)))&&(((NB_ATTENTE_A_9<1)||(ROUTE_A_0<1))&&((NB_ATTENT...14072
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(((!(EG(!(((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8<1)||(ROUTE_A_0<1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_A_7<1)||(ROUTE_A_0<1)))&&(((NB_ATTE...15834
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t25, t56, t57, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t70,...1304
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 22:58:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2023-03-08 22:58:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 22:58:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6038302966979842299.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6038302966979842299.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6038302966979842299.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6038302966979842299.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6038302966979842299.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 22:58:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 22:58:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 22:58:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 531 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:58:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2023-03-08 22:58:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 133 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-08 22:58:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3824454755175127115.gal : 14 ms
[2023-03-08 22:58:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9395109203809142265.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3824454755175127115.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9395109203809142265.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:58:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2023-03-08 22:58:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 135 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 127 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 356 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7534060656313959304.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 22:58:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4953229358305297687.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7534060656313959304.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4953229358305297687.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.88068,92140,2,28766,5,176877,6,0,469,142706,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG(EF(EG(AF(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((CONTROLEUR_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_0>=1)))||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(NB_ATTEN...14317
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((E(!((E(!(EG((((((((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1))&&((ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_0>=1...29109
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t55, t56, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t69, t70,...1298
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 22:59:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 22:59:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 22:59:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10379665506238396054.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10379665506238396054.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10379665506238396054.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10379665506238396054.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10379665506238396054.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 22:59:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 22:59:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 22:59:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 301 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:59:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2023-03-08 22:59:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 96 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2023-03-08 22:59:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14334320916943045304.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 22:59:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9618086662263830013.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14334320916943045304.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9618086662263830013.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,25.905,341588,2303,4370,298221,26779,127,1.51103e+06,304,3.09242e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG(EF(EG(AF(((((((((((i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((i0.u2.CONTROLEUR_1>=1)&&(u4.COMPTEUR_0>=1)))||(((i0.u2.NB...17857
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((E(!((E(!(EG((((((((i1.u0.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1))&&((i0.u1.ATTENTE_A_0>=1)...35390
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:213)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 124 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 119 ms returned [13]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 187 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 344 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10533848786836858761.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 22:59:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8211617168658213402.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10533848786836858761.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8211617168658213402.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,0.506613,20912,2,8048,5,37424,6,0,470,30355,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(!(E(!((((((SUR_PONT_A_0>=1)||(((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1))))||((((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&...10363
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(!((((((SUR_PONT_A_0>=1)||(((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(CONTRO...10408
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t25, t56, t57, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t70,...1304
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 23:00:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2023-03-08 23:00:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 23:00:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3049004747316370179.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3049004747316370179.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3049004747316370179.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3049004747316370179.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3049004747316370179.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 23:00:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 23:00:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 23:00:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 544 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:00:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2023-03-08 23:00:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 98 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-08 23:00:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6500910978030023706.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 23:00:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2204696795889260608.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6500910978030023706.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2204696795889260608.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.70063,54604,1126,1129,42560,18412,165,144048,145,366872,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(!(E(!((((((i0.u0.SUR_PONT_A_0>=1)||(((i0.u0.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i0.u2.ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(u3.CONTROLEUR_1>=...13219
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(!((((((i0.u0.SUR_PONT_A_0>=1)||(((i0.u0.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i0.u2....13264
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t57, t92, t101, t180, t189, i0.u0.t11, i0.u0.t24, i2.t156, i2.t152, i2.t56...255
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 22 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 168 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 164 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 498 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14866233183252475654.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 23:00:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10383942030398484795.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14866233183252475654.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10383942030398484795.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,9.05464,163536,2,38743,5,312668,6,0,474,355666,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(E(((((((((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||(((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_8>=1))&&((A...2549
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((((((((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1)...5167
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 23/0/265
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t25, t56, t57, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t70,...1304
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 23:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-03-08 23:01:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 23:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2448618874604063505.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2448618874604063505.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2448618874604063505.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2448618874604063505.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2448618874604063505.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 23:01:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 23:01:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 23:01:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 563 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2023-03-08 23:01:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 126 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-08 23:01:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18075939343927606248.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 23:01:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14375748555804753866.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18075939343927606248.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14375748555804753866.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.62434,45628,1407,1010,51914,9012,180,167503,134,85034,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(E(((((((((i0.u0.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i1.u1.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i0.u3.ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||(((i0.u0.CAPACITE_0>...3275
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((((((((i0.u0.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i1.u1.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i0.u3.ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&...6619
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t57, t104, t112, t192, t200, i0.u0.t11, i0.u0.t24, i1.t156, i1.t146, i1.t5...256
(forward)formula 0,0,17.9509,281364,1,0,337018,39057,993,1.71442e+06,801,237126,279452
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:01:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 160 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned [13]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 272 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12535045440932417482.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 23:01:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4059323432471290110.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12535045440932417482.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4059323432471290110.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,0.665135,20912,2,8048,5,37424,6,0,470,30355,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX(((EG((((((((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||(((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_8>=1))&&(...32987
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(((((((FwdU((Init * !((!(EX(!(((EG((((((((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(CONTRO...99092
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t25, t56, t57, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t70,...1304
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 23:02:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2023-03-08 23:02:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 23:02:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4912619693270052635.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4912619693270052635.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4912619693270052635.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4912619693270052635.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4912619693270052635.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 23:02:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 23:02:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 23:02:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 544 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:02:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2023-03-08 23:02:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 94 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2023-03-08 23:02:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9587115206997672949.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 23:02:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9512946214969387988.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9587115206997672949.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9512946214969387988.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,3.7963,65172,1320,1173,58255,18067,178,184266,145,367342,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX(((EG((((((((i0.u1.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i0.u2.ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(u4.CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||(((i0.u1.CAPACITE_0>=...40226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(((((((FwdU((Init * !((!(EX(!(((EG((((((((i0.u1.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i0.u2.ATTENT...120785
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t57, t95, t101, t194, t200, i0.u1.t11, i0.u1.t24, i1.t79, i1.t71, i1.t56, ...253
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:02:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2023-03-08 23:02:45] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 23:02:45] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 101 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:02:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 23:02:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 23:02:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 23:02:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 23:02:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 23:02:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 23:02:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned [13]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 277 ms. Remains : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:02:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 23:02:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 23:02:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:02:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 23:02:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 23:02:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5821145829354292488.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 23:02:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12488346835660953858.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5821145829354292488.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12488346835660953858.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,0.466856,18796,2,4799,5,32299,6,0,465,26345,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(AF(AX((((((((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||(((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_8>=1))&...861
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((((((((CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(CONTROL...930
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t55, t56, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t69, t70,...1298
(forward)formula 0,1,15.1563,428252,1,0,861,1.17086e+06,567,261,4543,969037,693
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 134 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 62 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 105 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 307 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8663466681749231722.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 23:03:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9783683752276743758.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8663466681749231722.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9783683752276743758.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,8.84299,163632,2,38743,5,312668,6,0,474,355666,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(EF(((((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((CONTROLEUR_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_...33475
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U ((((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((CONTROLEUR_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_6>=...57697
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t25, t56, t57, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t70,...1304
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 23:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-08 23:03:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 23:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2284430438603146097.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2284430438603146097.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2284430438603146097.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2284430438603146097.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2284430438603146097.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 23:03:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 23:03:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 23:03:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 531 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:03:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 69 ms
[2023-03-08 23:03:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 133 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2023-03-08 23:03:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15230403617540376062.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 23:03:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14040034252759239697.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15230403617540376062.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14040034252759239697.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 23:04:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 64 ms
[2023-03-08 23:04:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2023-03-08 23:04:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 23:04:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10056403406257178118.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10056403406257178118.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10056403406257178118.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10056403406257178118.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10056403406257178118.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 23:04:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 23:04:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 23:04:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 531 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 23:04:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2023-03-08 23:04:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 133 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2023-03-08 23:04:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2919748614038331242.gal : 14 ms
[2023-03-08 23:04:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1360442065910188747.ctl : 13 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2919748614038331242.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1360442065910188747.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,12.971,211468,2384,858,293820,12987,140,1.52735e+06,127,147601,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(A(((((AF((((((((i1.u1.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_2>=1))||((i1.u1.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_3>=1)))||(((i1.u1.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(i2.u...16059
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((i0.u2.CONTROL...40717
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t57, t193, t200, i1.u1.t11, i1.u1.t24, i2.t79, i2.t69, Intersection ...238
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,115.305,1072316,1,0,1.6175e+06,41309,1393,6.79535e+06,799,378235,1194621
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (EX(EF(((((((((((i1.u1.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i1.u3.ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i0.u2.CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||(((i1.u1.CAPACITE_...27660
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((((i1.u1.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i1.u3.ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i0...52008
dead was empty
(forward)formula 1,1,179.957,1426076,1,0,2.25495e+06,47595,1658,8.47184e+06,843,429209,1710349
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AF(EG((((((((i1.u1.CHOIX_0<1)||(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_2<1))&&((i1.u1.CHOIX_0<1)||(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_3<1)))&&(((i1.u1.CHOIX_0<1)||(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_0...16124
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(EG((((((((i1.u1.CHOIX_0<1)||(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_2<1))&&((i1.u1.CHOIX_0<1)||(i2.u4.COMP...16395
(forward)formula 2,1,228.882,1823924,1,0,2.83239e+06,50699,1785,1.07304e+07,844,474960,2101452
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AX(EG(((E(!(((((((((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((i2.u5....37130
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((((i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&(...61545
(forward)formula 3,0,338.371,2030108,1,0,3.18489e+06,53736,2612,1.15167e+07,909,512224,2374861
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (AF(((AF(((((((i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_8<1)||(i0.u0.ROUTE_A_0<1))&&((i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_7<1)||(i0.u0.ROUTE_A_0<1)))&&(((i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_9<1...18044
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(((!(EG(!(((((((i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_8<1)||(i0.u0.ROUTE_A_0<1))&&((i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_7<1)||(i0.u0.RO...20286
(forward)formula 4,0,478.41,2207448,1,0,3.43864e+06,56611,357,1.24071e+07,410,553490,100224
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(AG(EF(EG(AF(((((((((((i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((i0.u2.CONTROLEUR_1>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_0>=1)))||(((i0.u2...18385
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((E(!((E(!(EG((((((((i1.u1.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1))&&((i0.u0.ATTENTE_A_0>=1)...37473
(forward)formula 5,0,608.041,2207448,1,0,3.43864e+06,56611,1385,1.24071e+07,613,553490,1185618
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(EG(!(E(!((((((i1.u1.SUR_PONT_A_0>=1)||(((i1.u1.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i1.u3.ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i0.u2.CONTROLEUR_...13249
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(!((((((i1.u1.SUR_PONT_A_0>=1)||(((i1.u1.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i1.u3....13294
dead was empty
(forward)formula 6,1,653.111,2207448,1,0,3.43864e+06,56611,2207,1.24071e+07,675,553490,1465733
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: ((AX(((EG((((((((i1.u1.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i1.u3.ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i0.u2.CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||(((i1.u1.CAPACITE_...42407
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(((((((FwdU((Init * !((!(EX(!(((EG((((((((i1.u1.CAPACITE_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i1.u3.ATTENT...127328
dead was empty
(forward)formula 7,1,1151.23,2207628,1,0,3.43864e+06,56611,2823,1.24071e+07,736,553490,1811164
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E(!(EF(((((((((((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((i2.u5.NB_A...42913
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U ((((((((((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_0>...73903
(forward)formula 8,1,1220.58,2207692,1,0,3.43864e+06,56611,2863,1.24071e+07,736,553490,1983181
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Total runtime 2006824 ms.

BK_STOP 1678317864276

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r037-tajo-167813689800010"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10.tgz
mv BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;