Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r005-oct2-167813593100450.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 extended_l2=off compression_type=zlib size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-06a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r005-oct2-167813593100450
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 516K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K Feb 25 18:01 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K Feb 25 18:01 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K Feb 25 17:59 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 39K Feb 25 17:59 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Feb 25 15:32 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Feb 25 15:32 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Feb 25 15:32 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Feb 25 15:32 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Feb 25 18:04 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 149K Feb 25 18:04 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K Feb 25 18:03 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K Feb 25 18:03 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Feb 25 15:32 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Feb 25 15:32 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678513570291

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-06a
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-11 05:46:14] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-11 05:46:14] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-11 05:46:14] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 78 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:14] [INFO ] Transformed 157 places.
[2023-03-11 05:46:14] [INFO ] Transformed 155 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:14] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2023-03-11 05:46:14] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 157 places and 155 transitions and 500 arcs in 226 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 30 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 30 transitions.
Support contains 77 out of 157 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 25 ms. Remains 157 /157 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 157 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:14] [INFO ] Computed 40 place invariants in 20 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 939 ms returned [35, 42, 45, 60, 118, 124, 142, 148, 154]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 993 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/157 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 148 /148 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1030 ms. Remains : 148/157 places, 125/125 transitions.
Support contains 77 out of 148 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 282 resets, run finished after 637 ms. (steps per millisecond=15 ) properties (out of 60) seen :42
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 18 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 148 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:16] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 31 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2023-03-11 05:46:17] [INFO ] After 251ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:18
[2023-03-11 05:46:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 31 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2023-03-11 05:46:17] [INFO ] After 491ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :16
[2023-03-11 05:46:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:46:17] [INFO ] After 174ms SMT Verify possible using 20 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :16
[2023-03-11 05:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 191 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 05:46:18] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 222 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 150 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 05:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 279 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 05:46:18] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 473 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] After 1304ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :16
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 251 ms.
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] After 2198ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :16
Fused 18 Parikh solutions to 15 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 13 properties in 86 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 148 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 148 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 103
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 92
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 115 transition count 92
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 111 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 111 transition count 88
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 105 transition count 82
Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 105 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 97 transition count 74
Applied a total of 102 rules in 38 ms. Remains 97 /148 variables (removed 51) and now considering 74/125 (removed 51) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 38 ms. Remains : 97/148 places, 74/125 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 436 resets, run finished after 77 ms. (steps per millisecond=129 ) properties (out of 3) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 83 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=416 ) properties (out of 2) seen :1
Finished Best-First random walk after 295 steps, including 1 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=295 )
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 144 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 144 transition count 121
Applied a total of 8 rules in 9 ms. Remains 144 /148 variables (removed 4) and now considering 121/125 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 144 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 45, 48, 54, 88, 123, 129, 143]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 86 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/148 places, 121/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 130 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 130 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 129 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 129 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 128 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 128 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 127 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 127 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 126 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 126 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 125 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 125 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 124 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 124 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 123 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 123 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 122 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 122 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 121 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 121 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 120 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 120 transition count 108
Applied a total of 26 rules in 21 ms. Remains 120 /133 variables (removed 13) and now considering 108/121 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 120 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 120/148 places, 108/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 256 ms. Remains : 120/148 places, 108/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15499389988393817261.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16549581928405588710.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15499389988393817261.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16549581928405588710.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19327e+09,0.349218,16920,2,1993,5,44825,6,0,588,82518,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((p19==1)) + EG(((p104==1) + E(EX((p3!=1)) U ((AG((p79==1)) + !(((p54==1)&&(p141==1)))) + ((((p41==1)&&(p15==1))&&(p88==1))||(p27!=1))...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(p19==1))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,((p104==1) + E(EX((p3!=1)) U ((!(E(TRUE U !((p79==1)))) + !(((p54==...233
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t89, t97, Intersection with r...234
(forward)formula 0,1,1.64638,50056,1,0,216,231527,256,119,3693,230527,250
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 144 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 144 transition count 121
Applied a total of 8 rules in 16 ms. Remains 144 /148 variables (removed 4) and now considering 121/125 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 144 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:21] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 45, 48, 51, 54, 88, 123, 129, 143]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 192 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/148 places, 121/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 129 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 129 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 128 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 128 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 127 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 127 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 126 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 126 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 125 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 125 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 124 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 124 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 123 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 123 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 122 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 122 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 121 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 121 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 120 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 120 transition count 109
Applied a total of 24 rules in 15 ms. Remains 120 /132 variables (removed 12) and now considering 109/121 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 120 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:21] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:46:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:46:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 265 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 368 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 120/148 places, 109/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 592 ms. Remains : 120/148 places, 109/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1739774510252523703.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13039306229266708236.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1739774510252523703.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13039306229266708236.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19353e+09,0.372937,18300,2,2029,5,51016,6,0,591,89899,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX(EX((EF((p71==1)) + ((p78==0)&&((p71==1)||((p17==1)&&(p132==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(EX((E(TRUE U (p71==1)) + ((p78==0)&&((p71==1)||((p17==1)&&(p132==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t88, t97, Intersection with r...234
(forward)formula 0,1,4.60208,146284,1,0,246,893732,240,135,3512,581692,301
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 148 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 103
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 91
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 114 transition count 91
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 110 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 110 transition count 87
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 103 transition count 80
Applied a total of 90 rules in 40 ms. Remains 103 /148 variables (removed 45) and now considering 80/125 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 103 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:26] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 209 ms returned [13, 19, 25, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 59, 83, 89, 102]
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 225 ms to find 17 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/148 places, 80/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 86 transition count 63
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 69 transition count 63
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 69 transition count 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 65 transition count 59
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 62 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 62 transition count 56
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 61 transition count 55
Applied a total of 50 rules in 19 ms. Remains 61 /86 variables (removed 25) and now considering 55/80 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 61 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 11 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 199 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 61/148 places, 55/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 484 ms. Remains : 61/148 places, 55/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability33701338990275532.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13682193449075303849.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability33701338990275532.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13682193449075303849.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,802561,0.026874,4572,2,865,5,5634,6,0,299,6100,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(EF(EG((((p24==1)&&(p138==1))&&((p5==1)&&((p3==1)||(p17==1)))))) U EG(AG(((p10==1)&&(p126==1))))) + EF(((p7==1)&&(p94==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((p10==1)&&(p126==1)))))))))) * !(E(!(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((p10==1)&&(p126==1)))))...348
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t9, t12, t14, t16, t49, t54, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...192
(forward)formula 0,1,0.169457,11172,1,0,170,41609,145,78,1874,32292,199
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 148 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 103
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 91
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 114 transition count 91
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 110 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 110 transition count 87
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 100 transition count 77
Applied a total of 96 rules in 9 ms. Remains 100 /148 variables (removed 48) and now considering 77/125 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 100 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned [5, 11, 16, 21, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 56, 80, 86, 99]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 145 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/148 places, 77/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 82 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 57 transition count 52
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 54 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 54 transition count 49
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 52 transition count 47
Applied a total of 60 rules in 5 ms. Remains 52 /82 variables (removed 30) and now considering 47/77 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 47 rows 52 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:46:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 121 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 251 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 52/148 places, 47/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 410 ms. Remains : 52/148 places, 47/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 47 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11415995710371855175.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13369540866801978726.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11415995710371855175.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13369540866801978726.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,212993,0.020448,3980,2,466,5,2920,6,0,257,3314,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((((p10==0)||(p126==0))||(p37==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((((p10==0)||(p126==0))||(p37==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t11, t39, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect...173
(forward)formula 0,1,0.380261,19260,1,0,327,96505,120,154,1535,102591,364
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 145 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 145 transition count 122
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 145 /148 variables (removed 3) and now considering 122/125 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 145 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 189 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 45, 48, 51, 54, 88, 123]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 203 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/148 places, 122/125 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 133 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 133 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 132 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 132 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 131 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 131 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 130 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 130 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 129 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 129 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 128 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 128 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 127 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 127 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 126 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 126 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 125 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 125 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 124 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 124 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 123 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 123 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 122 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 122 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 121 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 121 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 120 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 120 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 119 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 119 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 118 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 118 transition count 105
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 117 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 117 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 116 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 116 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 115 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 115 transition count 102
Applied a total of 40 rules in 27 ms. Remains 115 /135 variables (removed 20) and now considering 102/122 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 115 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:46:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:46:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 302 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 361 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 115/148 places, 102/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 593 ms. Remains : 115/148 places, 102/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9923559545804406747.gal : 5 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5477120363104939760.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9923559545804406747.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5477120363104939760.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25919e+09,0.351358,18816,2,3302,5,53587,6,0,564,85828,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX(AG((!(A((p50==1) U ((p137==1)&&(p156==1)))) * ((p136==0)||(p155==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((!(!((E(!(((p137==1)&&(p156==1))) U (!((p50==1)) * !(((p137==1)&&(p156==1))))) + ...228
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t49, t61, Intersection with r...234
(forward)formula 0,0,10.2385,322564,1,0,815,2.14599e+06,237,406,3439,1.69927e+06,917
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 144 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 144 transition count 121
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 144 /148 variables (removed 4) and now considering 121/125 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 144 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 216 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 45, 48, 51, 54, 88, 123, 129, 143]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 217 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/148 places, 121/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 129 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 129 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 128 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 128 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 127 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 127 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 126 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 126 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 125 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 125 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 124 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 124 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 123 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 123 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 122 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 122 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 121 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 121 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 120 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 120 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 119 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 119 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 118 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 118 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 117 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 117 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 116 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 116 transition count 105
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 115 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 115 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 114 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 114 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 113 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 113 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 112 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 112 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 111 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 111 transition count 100
Applied a total of 42 rules in 14 ms. Remains 111 /132 variables (removed 21) and now considering 100/121 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 111 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 176 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 111/148 places, 100/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 411 ms. Remains : 111/148 places, 100/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7516465109211041951.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5131175749489923114.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7516465109211041951.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5131175749489923114.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19117e+09,0.25626,16404,2,1685,5,43974,6,0,546,79756,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((p44==0) + EX((p44==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((p44==0) + EX((p44==0))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t49, t61, Intersection with r...234
(forward)formula 0,1,4.74602,176888,1,0,380,1.13357e+06,228,195,3269,831818,424
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 144 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 144 transition count 121
Applied a total of 8 rules in 13 ms. Remains 144 /148 variables (removed 4) and now considering 121/125 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 144 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:44] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 45, 48, 51, 54, 88, 123, 129, 143]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 202 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/148 places, 121/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 129 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 129 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 128 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 128 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 127 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 127 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 126 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 126 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 125 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 125 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 124 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 124 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 123 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 123 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 122 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 122 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 121 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 121 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 120 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 120 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 119 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 119 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 118 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 118 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 117 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 117 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 116 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 116 transition count 105
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 115 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 115 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 114 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 114 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 113 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 113 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 112 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 112 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 111 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 111 transition count 100
Applied a total of 42 rules in 27 ms. Remains 111 /132 variables (removed 21) and now considering 100/121 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 111 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:44] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:46:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:46:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 197 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 111/148 places, 100/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 439 ms. Remains : 111/148 places, 100/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1871083071002761621.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15782879440566321251.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1871083071002761621.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15782879440566321251.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19117e+09,0.346016,16408,2,1685,5,43974,6,0,546,79756,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX(AX((p37==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(EX(!((p37==0)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t49, t61, Intersection with r...234
(forward)formula 0,1,1.44072,41856,1,0,204,197051,226,107,3425,192189,227
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 148 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 103
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 91
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 114 transition count 91
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 110 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 110 transition count 87
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 100 transition count 77
Applied a total of 96 rules in 32 ms. Remains 100 /148 variables (removed 48) and now considering 77/125 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 100 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:46] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 322 ms returned [6, 12, 17, 22, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 56, 80, 86, 99]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 358 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/148 places, 77/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 82 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 57 transition count 52
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 54 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 54 transition count 49
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 52 transition count 47
Applied a total of 60 rules in 4 ms. Remains 52 /82 variables (removed 30) and now considering 47/77 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 47 rows 52 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:46] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 291 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 52/148 places, 47/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 686 ms. Remains : 52/148 places, 47/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 47 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4566648286591071877.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8451238738000380048.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4566648286591071877.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8451238738000380048.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,227329,0.018504,3976,2,327,5,2621,6,0,257,2626,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EF(((p3==1)&&(p120==1))) * AF(AG((p9==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * E(TRUE U ((p3==1)&&(p120==1)))) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p9==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t40, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.147208,11104,1,0,159,45406,119,78,1587,39374,183
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 144 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 144 transition count 121
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 144 /148 variables (removed 4) and now considering 121/125 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 144 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 15 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 334 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 45, 48, 51, 54, 88, 129, 143]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 347 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 134/148 places, 121/125 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 132 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 132 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 131 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 131 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 130 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 130 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 129 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 129 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 128 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 128 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 127 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 127 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 126 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 126 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 125 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 125 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 124 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 124 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 123 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 123 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 122 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 122 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 121 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 121 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 120 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 120 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 119 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 119 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 118 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 118 transition count 105
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 117 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 117 transition count 104
Applied a total of 34 rules in 12 ms. Remains 117 /134 variables (removed 17) and now considering 104/121 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 117 cols
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:46:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:46:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:46:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 242 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 117/148 places, 104/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 603 ms. Remains : 117/148 places, 104/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:46:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10478168040743645968.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:46:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6785639385067860996.ctl : 11 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10478168040743645968.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6785639385067860996.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.22597e+09,0.333255,18288,2,3609,5,51946,6,0,572,85380,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(EX(EF(((p130==1)&&(p155==1)))) U ((AF(AG(((p28==1)&&(p109==1)))) * !(AG(A(((p13==1)&&(p127==1)) U ((p17==1)&&(p132==1)))))) * EX(E(((p...253
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * E(EX(E(TRUE U ((p130==1)&&(p155==1)))) U ((!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p28==1)&&(p109==1)))))))) * !(!(E...409
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t61, t91, Intersection with r...234
(forward)formula 0,0,19.9261,451116,1,0,1158,3.01485e+06,262,596,3478,2.29226e+06,1336
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 144 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 144 transition count 121
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 144 /148 variables (removed 4) and now considering 121/125 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 144 cols
[2023-03-11 05:47:08] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 413 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 45, 48, 51, 88, 123, 129, 143]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 427 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/148 places, 121/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 130 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 130 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 129 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 129 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 128 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 128 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 127 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 127 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 126 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 126 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 125 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 125 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 124 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 124 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 123 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 123 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 122 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 122 transition count 110
Applied a total of 22 rules in 6 ms. Remains 122 /133 variables (removed 11) and now considering 110/121 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 122 cols
[2023-03-11 05:47:08] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:47:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:47:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:47:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 254 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 377 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 122/148 places, 110/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 813 ms. Remains : 122/148 places, 110/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:47:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:47:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5854460897498054181.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13631201991752804872.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5854460897498054181.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13631201991752804872.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19379e+09,0.402861,19368,2,2020,5,52138,6,0,598,99706,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((AX((A((p12==1) U (p102==1)) + ((p29==1)&&(p90==1)))) * (AX((((p57==1)&&(p147==1))||(p5==1))) + ((p1==1)&&(p86==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((!(EX(!((!((E(!((p102==1)) U (!((p12==1)) * !((p102==1)))) + EG(!((p102==1))))) + ((p29==1)&&(p9...247
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t87, t97, Intersection with r...234
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,15.3529,405832,1,0,1141,2.36408e+06,261,635,3576,2.60649e+06,1190
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 145 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 145 transition count 122
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 145 /148 variables (removed 3) and now considering 122/125 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 145 cols
[2023-03-11 05:47:24] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 26 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 45, 48, 51, 54, 123, 129]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 149 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/148 places, 122/125 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 133 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 133 transition count 120
Applied a total of 4 rules in 16 ms. Remains 133 /135 variables (removed 2) and now considering 120/122 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 133 cols
[2023-03-11 05:47:24] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:47:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:47:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 248 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 133/148 places, 120/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 418 ms. Remains : 133/148 places, 120/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:47:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:47:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16954169666392995940.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18395158764323192258.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16954169666392995940.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18395158764323192258.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.23288e+09,0.274738,14948,2,2053,5,43468,6,0,654,63934,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(((EG(((p149==0)||(p156==0))) + (p74==1)) + ((p92==1)&&(p155==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(((p92==1)&&(p155==1)))) * !((p74==1))) * !(EG(((p149==0)||(p156==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t61, t111, Intersection with reach...231
(forward)formula 0,0,8.57587,215148,1,0,799,1.49195e+06,266,404,3746,1.04441e+06,897
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 148 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 103
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 91
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 114 transition count 91
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 110 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 110 transition count 87
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 99 transition count 76
Applied a total of 98 rules in 20 ms. Remains 99 /148 variables (removed 49) and now considering 76/125 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 99 cols
[2023-03-11 05:47:33] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned [5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 55, 79, 85, 98]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 95 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/148 places, 76/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 81 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 56 transition count 51
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 53 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 53 transition count 48
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 51 transition count 46
Applied a total of 60 rules in 4 ms. Remains 51 /81 variables (removed 30) and now considering 46/76 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 51 cols
[2023-03-11 05:47:33] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:47:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:47:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 11 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 51/148 places, 46/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 353 ms. Remains : 51/148 places, 46/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17241508760811532116.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9500929138985981793.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17241508760811532116.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9500929138985981793.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,143361,0.020963,4236,2,710,5,3202,6,0,252,3509,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p38==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p38==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t38, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,0.075899,7140,1,0,96,17924,113,42,1491,12116,102
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 148 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 127 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 103
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 93
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 116 transition count 93
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 112 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 112 transition count 89
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 100 transition count 77
Applied a total of 96 rules in 9 ms. Remains 100 /148 variables (removed 48) and now considering 77/125 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 100 cols
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 9 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 129 ms returned [5, 10, 20, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 56, 80, 86, 99]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 130 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/148 places, 77/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 84 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 71 transition count 63
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 70 transition count 63
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 70 transition count 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 66 transition count 59
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 63 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 63 transition count 56
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 61 transition count 54
Applied a total of 46 rules in 18 ms. Remains 61 /84 variables (removed 23) and now considering 54/77 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 61 cols
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 182 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 61/148 places, 54/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 340 ms. Remains : 61/148 places, 54/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13089101342085147956.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6304051248171666279.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13089101342085147956.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6304051248171666279.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,270337,0.047626,5356,2,1330,5,8403,6,0,298,9487,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((((p44==0)&&((p1==0)||(p86==0)))||((p79==0)&&((p21==0)||(p96==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((((p44==0)&&((p1==0)||(p86==0)))||((p79==0)&&((p21==0)||(p96==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.150592,10108,1,0,9,33357,21,6,1481,18194,9
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 145 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 145 transition count 122
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 145 /148 variables (removed 3) and now considering 122/125 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 145 cols
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 209 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 48, 51, 54, 88, 124, 130]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 222 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/148 places, 122/125 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 133 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 133 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 132 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 132 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 131 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 131 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 130 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 130 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 129 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 129 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 128 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 128 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 127 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 127 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 126 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 126 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 125 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 125 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 124 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 124 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 123 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 123 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 122 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 122 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 121 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 121 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 120 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 120 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 119 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 119 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 118 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 118 transition count 105
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 117 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 117 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 116 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 116 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 115 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 115 transition count 102
Applied a total of 40 rules in 57 ms. Remains 115 /135 variables (removed 20) and now considering 102/122 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 115 cols
[2023-03-11 05:47:34] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:47:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:47:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:47:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 256 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 115/148 places, 102/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 538 ms. Remains : 115/148 places, 102/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:47:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:47:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3683184786473836460.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15942961541738635122.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3683184786473836460.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15942961541738635122.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25919e+09,0.422156,18812,2,3050,5,53746,6,0,562,88086,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p131==1)&&(p156==1)) U E((AG((p33==1)) + (((p10==1)&&(p126==1)) * (AG(((p48==1)&&(p129==1))) + AX(((p52==1)&&(p140==1)))))) U EG(!(((...179
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(FwdU(Init,((p131==1)&&(p156==1))),(!(E(TRUE U !((p33==1)))) + (((p10==1)&&(p126==1)) * (!(E(TRUE U !(...254
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 90/11/12
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t49, t61, Intersection with r...234
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 90/0/12
(forward)formula 0,1,2.52265,71272,1,0,206,291804,253,108,3632,381311,239
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 144 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 144 transition count 121
Applied a total of 8 rules in 7 ms. Remains 144 /148 variables (removed 4) and now considering 121/125 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 144 cols
[2023-03-11 05:47:37] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned [7, 45, 51, 54, 88, 123, 129, 143]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 126 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 136/148 places, 121/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 133 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 133 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 132 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 132 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 131 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 131 transition count 116
Applied a total of 10 rules in 9 ms. Remains 131 /136 variables (removed 5) and now considering 116/121 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 131 cols
[2023-03-11 05:47:37] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:47:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:47:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:47:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 342 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 477 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 131/148 places, 116/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 619 ms. Remains : 131/148 places, 116/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:47:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:47:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7144646694555569739.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:47:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10480128156102966434.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7144646694555569739.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10480128156102966434.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19536e+09,0.289038,15732,2,2031,5,43827,6,0,634,74325,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EF((AG(((p28==1)&&(p97==1))) * EX((p59==1)))) * A(E(EF((p70==1)) U (((p17==1)&&(p14==1))&&(p107==1))) U (EG((p74==1)) * (A((p10==1) ...393
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((p28==1)&&(p97==1))))) * EX((p59==1)))) * !((E(!((EG((p74==1)) * (!((E(!(...953
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t45, t61, Intersection with r...235
(forward)formula 0,0,28.4449,758328,1,0,2582,4.89595e+06,306,1516,4038,4.40283e+06,3078
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 125/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 148 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 103
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 92
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 6 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 115 transition count 92
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 111 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 111 transition count 88
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 101 transition count 78
Applied a total of 94 rules in 40 ms. Remains 101 /148 variables (removed 47) and now considering 78/125 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 101 cols
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned [5, 10, 20, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41, 57, 81, 87, 100]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 125 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/148 places, 78/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 85 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 69 transition count 62
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 69 transition count 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 66 transition count 59
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 63 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 63 transition count 56
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 61 transition count 54
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 60 transition count 53
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 60 transition count 53
Applied a total of 50 rules in 14 ms. Remains 60 /85 variables (removed 25) and now considering 53/78 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 60 cols
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 179 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 309 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 60/148 places, 53/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 488 ms. Remains : 60/148 places, 53/125 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18370333683384424548.gal : 6 ms
[2023-03-11 05:48:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8724150023577256415.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18370333683384424548.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8724150023577256415.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,471041,0.055938,4560,2,1080,5,4496,6,0,293,5627,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((((p21==1)&&(p82==1)) + (AF((p40==0)) * (((p38==0)||(p150==0))||(p53==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((p21==1)&&(p82==1)) + (!(EG(!((p40==0)))) * (((p38==0)||(p150==0))||(p53==0)))))] != FAL...157
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t4, t16, t45, t52, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
(forward)formula 0,1,0.330898,14856,1,0,198,55476,135,88,1738,55101,220
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2023-03-11 05:48:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-11 05:48:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Total runtime 113985 ms.

BK_STOP 1678513688431

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-06a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-06a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r005-oct2-167813593100450"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-06a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-06a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;