Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r005-oct2-167813593100434.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 extended_l2=off compression_type=zlib size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-05a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r005-oct2-167813593100434
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 444K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K Feb 25 18:13 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K Feb 25 18:13 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Feb 25 18:11 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K Feb 25 18:11 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Feb 25 15:32 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Feb 25 15:32 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Feb 25 15:32 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Feb 25 15:32 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K Feb 25 18:15 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K Feb 25 18:15 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K Feb 25 18:14 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K Feb 25 18:14 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Feb 25 15:32 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Feb 25 15:32 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678513267919

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-05a
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-11 05:41:10] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-11 05:41:10] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-11 05:41:10] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 57 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:10] [INFO ] Transformed 132 places.
[2023-03-11 05:41:10] [INFO ] Transformed 130 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:10] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2023-03-11 05:41:10] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 132 places and 130 transitions and 420 arcs in 161 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 25 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 25 transitions.
Support contains 91 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 132 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:10] [INFO ] Computed 34 place invariants in 11 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 437 ms returned [14, 47, 99, 129]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 465 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 128/132 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 127 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 127 transition count 104
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 127 /128 variables (removed 1) and now considering 104/105 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:11] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:41:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:41:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:41:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 209 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 127/132 places, 104/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 692 ms. Remains : 127/132 places, 104/105 transitions.
Support contains 91 out of 127 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 297 resets, run finished after 470 ms. (steps per millisecond=21 ) properties (out of 76) seen :61
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 15 properties.
[2023-03-11 05:41:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:41:12] [INFO ] After 187ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:15
[2023-03-11 05:41:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 30 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] After 249ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :12
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] After 66ms SMT Verify possible using 20 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :12
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] After 272ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :12
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 187 ms.
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] After 885ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :12
Fused 15 Parikh solutions to 10 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 23 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=23 )
Parikh walk visited 12 properties in 7 ms.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 251 ms returned [7, 20, 27, 34, 37, 40, 43, 48, 75, 102, 108, 114, 120]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 253 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 110 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 110 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 107 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 105 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 104 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 104 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 103 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 103 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 102 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 102 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 101 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 101 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 100 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 100 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 99 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 99 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 98 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 98 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 97 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 97 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 96 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 96 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 95 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 95 transition count 85
Applied a total of 38 rules in 41 ms. Remains 95 /114 variables (removed 19) and now considering 85/104 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 95 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:41:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:41:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 95/127 places, 85/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 441 ms. Remains : 95/127 places, 85/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5855923517761019053.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3349886276037289046.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5855923517761019053.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3349886276037289046.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.15221e+07,0.223229,13864,2,1408,5,35303,6,0,467,63367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX(EX(((p100==0)||(p131==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!(EX(((p100==0)||(p131==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t38, t48, t53, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,0.747717,30180,1,0,172,123545,195,90,2969,133327,194
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:14] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned [7, 20, 27, 34, 37, 40, 43, 48, 75, 102, 108, 114, 120, 126]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 130 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 108 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 108 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 107 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 107 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 106 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 106 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 105 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 105 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 104 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 104 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 103 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 103 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 102 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 102 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 101 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 101 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 100 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 100 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 99 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 99 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 98 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 98 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 97 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 97 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 96 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 96 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 95 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 95 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 94 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 94 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 93 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 93 transition count 84
Applied a total of 40 rules in 43 ms. Remains 93 /113 variables (removed 20) and now considering 84/104 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 93 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/127 places, 84/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 335 ms. Remains : 93/127 places, 84/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2757174428220260863.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6093962252619443656.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2757174428220260863.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6093962252619443656.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.96325e+07,0.226207,12864,2,1122,5,31746,6,0,458,58770,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((AX(((p11==0)||(p95==0))) + (p5==1)) + ((p18==1)&&(p96==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((!(EX(!(((p11==0)||(p95==0))))) + (p5==1)) + ((p18==1)&&(p96==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t38, t48, t53, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,0.432468,17136,1,0,170,77410,192,86,2683,58770,184
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 220 ms returned [7, 20, 34, 37, 40, 43, 48, 75, 102, 108, 114, 120, 126]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 221 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 107 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 96
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 106 /114 variables (removed 8) and now considering 96/104 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 106 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:41:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:41:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:41:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 106/127 places, 96/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 334 ms. Remains : 106/127 places, 96/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8387921973594491786.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13804741550709235549.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8387921973594491786.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13804741550709235549.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.00257e+07,0.169234,10832,2,1409,5,26064,6,0,520,42949,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E(EF((p49!=1)) U ((p28==1)&&(p55==1)))) + (A((!((((p19==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p115==1))) * EX((p10==1))) U E((p40==1) U ((p48==1)&&(p127==1)...175
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((Init * !(!(E(E(TRUE U (p49!=1)) U ((p28==1)&&(p55==1)))))),!(E((p40==1) U ((p48==1)&&(p127==1))))) * ...474
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t45, t57, t60, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,2.15172,74312,1,0,217,450205,216,120,3025,289344,270
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 185 ms returned [7, 27, 34, 37, 40, 43, 48, 75, 102, 108, 114, 120, 126]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 186 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 107 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 105 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 104 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 104 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 103 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 103 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 102 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 102 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 101 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 101 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 100 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 100 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 99 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 99 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 98 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 98 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 97 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 97 transition count 87
Applied a total of 34 rules in 20 ms. Remains 97 /114 variables (removed 17) and now considering 87/104 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 97 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 97/127 places, 87/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 439 ms. Remains : 97/127 places, 87/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11991003576614187840.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3530694245101627823.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11991003576614187840.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3530694245101627823.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.97308e+07,0.12903,9728,2,1188,5,22931,6,0,475,37472,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF(E((AX(((p21==1)&&(p69==1))) * EG((p13==1))) U (p40!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(E((!(EX(!(((p21==1)&&(p69==1))))) * EG((p13==1))) U (p40!=1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t41, t56, t71, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,3.54916,105116,1,0,483,592475,206,300,2726,670397,528
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 196 ms returned [7, 20, 27, 34, 37, 40, 43, 48, 75, 102, 108, 114, 120, 126]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 212 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 108 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 108 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 107 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 107 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 106 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 106 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 105 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 105 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 104 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 104 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 103 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 103 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 102 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 102 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 101 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 101 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 100 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 100 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 99 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 99 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 98 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 98 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 97 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 97 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 96 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 96 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 95 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 95 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 94 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 94 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 93 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 93 transition count 84
Applied a total of 40 rules in 9 ms. Remains 93 /113 variables (removed 20) and now considering 84/104 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 93 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 202 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/127 places, 84/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 426 ms. Remains : 93/127 places, 84/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6354012738116744651.gal : 17 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5882636092252649444.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6354012738116744651.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5882636092252649444.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.96325e+07,0.26386,12868,2,1122,5,31746,6,0,458,58770,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((p0==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((p0==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t38, t48, t53, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,3.02734,109600,1,0,628,678180,191,318,2624,618845,715
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:25] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 136 ms returned [7, 20, 27, 34, 37, 40, 43, 48, 75, 102, 108, 114, 120, 126]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 150 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 108 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 108 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 107 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 107 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 106 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 106 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 105 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 105 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 104 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 104 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 103 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 103 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 102 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 102 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 101 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 101 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 100 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 100 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 99 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 99 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 98 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 98 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 97 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 97 transition count 88
Applied a total of 32 rules in 8 ms. Remains 97 /113 variables (removed 16) and now considering 88/104 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 97 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:26] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:41:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 97/127 places, 88/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 309 ms. Remains : 97/127 places, 88/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8505523180836213886.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7110629201769318178.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8505523180836213886.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7110629201769318178.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.97636e+07,0.144583,10512,2,1320,5,25839,6,0,478,41727,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((!(A((p64==1) U EF((p63==1)))) * ((p3==0)||(p101==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (p63==1)))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U (p63==1))) U (!((p64==1)) * !(E(TRUE U (p63==1))))...217
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t42, t57, t73, Intersection with reachable a...223
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,7.12302,169968,1,0,429,1.07794e+06,209,301,2973,859373,529
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [20, 37, 40, 43, 75, 102, 108, 114, 120]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 112 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 114 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 114 transition count 100
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 114 /118 variables (removed 4) and now considering 100/104 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 114 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 195 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 114/127 places, 100/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 310 ms. Remains : 114/127 places, 100/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4107187203423057014.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8660931687867267697.ctl : 14 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4107187203423057014.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8660931687867267697.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.20136e+07,0.410738,20660,2,2770,5,55436,6,0,550,103396,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((E(((p36==1)&&(p103==1)) U (((p106==1)&&(p131==1))||((p7==1)&&(p79==1)))) + !(E((p9==1) U ((p35==1)&&(p93==1))))) + (AX((p2==0)) + A...345
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((E(((p36==1)&&(p103==1)) U (((p106==1)&&(p131==1))||((p7==1)&&(p79==1)))) + !(E((p9==1) U ((p35==1)...437
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t48, t63, Intersection with reachable at eac...219
(forward)formula 0,1,17.2217,491228,1,0,1535,2.85826e+06,257,869,3239,3.21721e+06,1626
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 224 ms returned [7, 27, 37, 40, 43, 48, 75, 102, 114, 120, 126]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 227 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 116/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 112 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 112 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 111 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 111 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 110 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 110 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 109 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 109 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 108 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 108 transition count 96
Applied a total of 16 rules in 26 ms. Remains 108 /116 variables (removed 8) and now considering 96/104 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 108 cols
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 196 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 108/127 places, 96/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 451 ms. Remains : 108/127 places, 96/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18186495501867637456.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:41:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11508671143439999126.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18186495501867637456.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11508671143439999126.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.18825e+07,0.255674,12960,2,2666,5,34281,6,0,526,53258,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AX(AF(((p20==1)&&(p114==1)))) + AX(((!(A(((p111==1)&&(p130==1)) U ((p21==1)&&(p91==1)))) + ((p10==1)&&(p107==1))) * EF(AX(((p35==1)&&...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(EG(!(((p20==1)&&(p114==1)))))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(((!(!((E(!(((p21==1)&&(...338
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t44, t55, t59, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,12.1183,270424,1,0,1247,1.78461e+06,233,626,3186,1.45363e+06,1419
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 127 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 117 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 116 transition count 93
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 116 transition count 82
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 105 transition count 82
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 96 transition count 73
Applied a total of 62 rules in 56 ms. Remains 96 /127 variables (removed 31) and now considering 73/104 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 96 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:03] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned [5, 14, 19, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 52, 72, 78, 84, 89]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 139 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/127 places, 73/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 80 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 65 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 64 transition count 57
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 64 transition count 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 59 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 55 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 55 transition count 48
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 54 transition count 47
Applied a total of 52 rules in 12 ms. Remains 54 /80 variables (removed 26) and now considering 47/73 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 47 rows 54 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 54/127 places, 47/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 329 ms. Remains : 54/127 places, 47/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 47 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11886122629569451913.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5146455764771147087.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11886122629569451913.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5146455764771147087.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,81921,0.0209,4252,2,599,5,3704,6,0,263,4287,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((p58==0)) + EG(((A(((p100==1)&&(p131==1)) U ((p42==1)&&(p115==1))) * (p33==0)) * ((p50==0)||(p128==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG(((!((E(!(((p42==1)&&(p115==1))) U (!(((p100==1)&&(p131==1))) * !(((p42==1)&&(p115==1))))) + ...255
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t46, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.38253,20844,1,0,363,105837,132,195,1705,88826,426
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned [7, 27, 37, 40, 43, 48, 75, 102, 108, 114, 120]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 129 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 116/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 112 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 112 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 111 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 111 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 110 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 110 transition count 98
Applied a total of 12 rules in 18 ms. Remains 110 /116 variables (removed 6) and now considering 98/104 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 110 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:42:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:42:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 243 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 329 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 110/127 places, 98/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 479 ms. Remains : 110/127 places, 98/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14244506667362155911.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17932210231834898750.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14244506667362155911.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17932210231834898750.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.19481e+07,0.178876,11656,2,1948,5,28562,6,0,536,45532,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(!((E(((p112==1)&&(p131==1)) U (p84==1)) * EX(E((p43==1) U ((p21==1)&&(p54==1)))))) U ((p24==1)&&(p119==1))) U ((p35==1)&&(p56==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(!((E(((p112==1)&&(p131==1)) U (p84==1)) * EX(E((p43==1) U ((p21==1)&&(p54==1)))))) U ((p24==1)&&(p...199
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t46, t59, t61, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,14.4255,380640,1,0,1305,2.15169e+06,230,845,3123,2.73163e+06,1339
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:19] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 257 ms returned [20, 27, 34, 40, 48, 75, 102, 108, 114, 120]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 259 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 113 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 113 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 112 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 112 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 111 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 111 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 110 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 110 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 109 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 109 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 108 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 108 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 107 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 107 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 106 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 106 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 105 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 105 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 104 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 104 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 103 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 103 transition count 90
Applied a total of 28 rules in 10 ms. Remains 103 /117 variables (removed 14) and now considering 90/104 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 103 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:19] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/127 places, 90/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 485 ms. Remains : 103/127 places, 90/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1263531636590821696.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13360672025226551385.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1263531636590821696.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13360672025226551385.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.16859e+07,0.178379,12400,2,2532,5,33014,6,0,498,49851,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((p5==0)) + E(!((AX(EF(((p106==1)&&(p131==1)))) * AG(((p38==1)&&(p104==1))))) U (AX(AG(AX(((p31==1)&&(p125==1))))) * AX(((AX(((p7==1)&...214
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(p5==0))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,!((!(EX(!(E(TRUE U ((p106==1)&&(p131==1)))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p38...344
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 88/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.500462,23000,1,0,12,100368,19,4,2445,71973,9
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [7, 20, 27, 34, 37, 40, 43, 48, 75, 102, 108, 114, 120]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 110 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 110 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 107 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 105 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 104 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 104 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 103 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 103 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 102 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 102 transition count 92
Applied a total of 24 rules in 6 ms. Remains 102 /114 variables (removed 12) and now considering 92/104 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 102 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 164 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 102/127 places, 92/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 246 ms. Remains : 102/127 places, 92/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12639442104799571946.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3309452585325971227.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12639442104799571946.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3309452585325971227.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.17515e+07,0.161222,11340,2,1518,5,27904,6,0,502,44242,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EX((p6==1)) * (((p87==1)||(p13==1)) + (((p27==0) * ((p13==0) + E(((p100==1)&&(p131==1)) U ((p17==1)&&(p113==1))))) + ((p4==1)&&(p94==...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EX((p6==1)) * (((p87==1)||(p13==1)) + (((p27==0) * ((p13==0) + E(((p100==1)&&(p131==1)) U ((p17==1)&...205
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t58, t72, t79, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,3.36925,134004,1,0,428,661518,215,263,2910,978101,373
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 207 ms returned [20, 34, 37, 40, 43, 48, 75, 102, 108, 114]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 224 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 114 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 114 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 113 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 113 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 112 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 112 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 111 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 111 transition count 98
Applied a total of 12 rules in 7 ms. Remains 111 /117 variables (removed 6) and now considering 98/104 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 111 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 221 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 305 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 111/127 places, 98/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 538 ms. Remains : 111/127 places, 98/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5256432144930917886.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13830386031724259776.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5256432144930917886.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13830386031724259776.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.38049e+07,0.185505,11136,2,2202,5,27290,6,0,540,41893,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((A(((EF(((p28==1)&&(p82==1))) * EF((p30==1))) * !(E(((p123==1)&&(p130==1)) U (p33==1)))) U ((EF(((p7==1)&&(p89==1))) + (p43==1)) + (((p...278
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(!((E(!(((E(TRUE U ((p7==1)&&(p89==1))) + (p43==1)) + (((p18==1)&&(p96==1))||(p10==1)))) U (!(((E(T...964
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t45, t57, t60, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,0.741574,28224,1,0,274,135783,229,144,3153,105656,343
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 127 /127 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:25] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 244 ms returned [7, 20, 27, 34, 37, 40, 43, 48, 75, 102, 108, 120, 126]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 246 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 110 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 110 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 107 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 105 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 104 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 104 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 103 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 103 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 102 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 102 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 101 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 101 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 100 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 100 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 99 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 99 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 98 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 98 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 97 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 97 transition count 87
Applied a total of 34 rules in 9 ms. Remains 97 /114 variables (removed 17) and now considering 87/104 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 97 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:26] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:42:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:42:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 173 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 97/127 places, 87/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 431 ms. Remains : 97/127 places, 87/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7781780569573793495.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8325632622757345409.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7781780569573793495.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8325632622757345409.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.15876e+07,0.215866,13412,2,1629,5,35460,6,0,477,57396,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AG(((EF((p20==1)) + EX((p3==1))) + ((p10==1)||(p65==1)))) * ((EG((p23==0)) + ((p117==1)&&(p130==1))) + (p20==1)))) + (AG(A(!(((p23==...302
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((E(TRUE U (p20==1)) + EX((p3==1))) + ((p10==1)||(p65==1)))))) * ...927
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t40, t55, t69, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,5.6276,211524,1,0,739,1.35423e+06,206,370,2865,1.15903e+06,830
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 30 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 30 transitions
Performed 30 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 30
Iterating post reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 118 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 88 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 87 transition count 72
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 87 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 70 transition count 60
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 70 transition count 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 65 transition count 55
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 55 transition count 45
Applied a total of 129 rules in 8 ms. Remains 55 /127 variables (removed 72) and now considering 45/104 (removed 59) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 55 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:31] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [26, 38, 42, 46, 50]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/127 places, 45/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 46 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 46 transition count 41
Applied a total of 8 rules in 20 ms. Remains 46 /50 variables (removed 4) and now considering 41/45 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 46 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:31] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 46/127 places, 41/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 259 ms. Remains : 46/127 places, 41/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1792547885566124657.gal : 0 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5041429080961791758.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1792547885566124657.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5041429080961791758.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25600,0.011236,3612,2,154,5,1184,6,0,228,1232,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((p118==1)&&(p131==1))) * EF((p84==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U ((p118==1)&&(p131==1)))),TRUE) * (p84==0))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.029151,4456,1,0,10,6092,16,3,1122,3042,8
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 127/127 places, 104/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 127 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 114 transition count 91
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 114 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 102 transition count 79
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 92 transition count 69
Applied a total of 70 rules in 16 ms. Remains 92 /127 variables (removed 35) and now considering 69/104 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 92 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned [5, 14, 19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 48, 68, 74, 85, 91]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 90 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/127 places, 69/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 74 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 56 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 51 transition count 46
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 51 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 50 transition count 45
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 46 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 46 transition count 41
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 45 transition count 40
Applied a total of 58 rules in 13 ms. Remains 45 /74 variables (removed 29) and now considering 40/69 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 45 cols
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/127 places, 40/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 246 ms. Remains : 45/127 places, 40/104 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5533722359618267416.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7497049929915700461.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5533722359618267416.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7497049929915700461.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,23553,0.022711,3920,2,338,5,1873,6,0,222,1992,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AF(((p117==0)||(p130==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EG(!(((p117==0)||(p130==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.060671,5240,1,0,9,9520,21,5,1098,3852,9
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-11 05:42:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Total runtime 82014 ms.

BK_STOP 1678513352798

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-05a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-05a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r005-oct2-167813593100434"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-05a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-05a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;