fond
Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
smpt compared to other tools (��Surprise�� models, ReachabilityCardinality)
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

Introduction

This page presents how smpt do cope efficiently with the ReachabilityCardinality examination face to the other participating tools. In this page, we consider «Surprise» models.

The next sections will show chart comparing performances in terms of both memory and execution time.The x-axis corresponds to the challenging tool where the y-axes represents smpt' performances. Thus, points below the diagonal of a chart denote comparisons favorables to the tool while others corresponds to situations where the challenging tool performs better.

You might also find plots out of the range that denote the case were at least one tool could not answer appropriately (error, time-out, could not compute or did not competed).

smpt versus GreatSPN

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 412 runs (206 for smpt and 206 for GreatSPN, so there are 206 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing smpt to GreatSPN are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  smpt GreatSPN Both tools   smpt GreatSPN
All computed OK 102 0 39   Smallest Memory Footprint
smpt = GreatSPN 3 Times tool wins 148 46
smpt > GreatSPN 11   Shortest Execution Time
smpt < GreatSPN 39 Times tool wins 119 75
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 0 0 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 0 102 12


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where smpt computed more values than GreatSPN, denote cases where smpt computed less values than GreatSPN, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

smpt wins when points are below the diagonal, GreatSPN wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

smpt versus ITS-Tools

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 412 runs (206 for smpt and 206 for ITS-Tools, so there are 206 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing smpt to ITS-Tools are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  smpt ITS-Tools Both tools   smpt ITS-Tools
All computed OK 0 12 63   Smallest Memory Footprint
smpt = ITS-Tools 16 Times tool wins 57 149
smpt > ITS-Tools 7   Shortest Execution Time
smpt < ITS-Tools 108 Times tool wins 29 177
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 0 0 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 12 0 0


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where smpt computed more values than ITS-Tools, denote cases where smpt computed less values than ITS-Tools, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

smpt wins when points are below the diagonal, ITS-Tools wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

smpt versus Tapaal

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 412 runs (206 for smpt and 206 for Tapaal, so there are 206 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing smpt to Tapaal are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  smpt Tapaal Both tools   smpt Tapaal
All computed OK 0 12 63   Smallest Memory Footprint
smpt = Tapaal 24 Times tool wins 21 185
smpt > Tapaal 7   Shortest Execution Time
smpt < Tapaal 100 Times tool wins 17 189
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 0 0 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 12 0 0


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where smpt computed more values than Tapaal, denote cases where smpt computed less values than Tapaal, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

smpt wins when points are below the diagonal, Tapaal wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

smpt versus 2021-gold

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 412 runs (206 for smpt and 206 for 2021-gold, so there are 206 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing smpt to 2021-gold are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  smpt 2021-gold Both tools   smpt 2021-gold
All computed OK 1 12 63   Smallest Memory Footprint
smpt = 2021-gold 20 Times tool wins 74 132
smpt > 2021-gold 6   Shortest Execution Time
smpt < 2021-gold 104 Times tool wins 37 169
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 0 1 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 12 0 0


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where smpt computed more values than 2021-gold, denote cases where smpt computed less values than 2021-gold, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

smpt wins when points are below the diagonal, 2021-gold wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart