Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
TINA.tedd-c compared to other tools (��Known�� models, StateSpace)
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

# Introduction

This page presents how tedd-c do cope efficiently with the StateSpace examination face to the other participating tools. In this page, we consider «Known» models.

The next sections will show chart comparing performances in terms of both memory and execution time.The x-axis corresponds to the challenging tool where the y-axes represents tedd-c' performances. Thus, points below the diagonal of a chart denote comparisons favorables to the tool while others corresponds to situations where the challenging tool performs better.

You might also find plots out of the range that denote the case were at least one tool could not answer appropriately (error, time-out, could not compute or did not competed).

# tedd-c versus GreatSPN

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 2822 runs (1411 for tedd-c and 1411 for GreatSPN, so there are 1411 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing tedd-c to GreatSPN are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

 Statistics on the executions tedd-c GreatSPN Both tools tedd-c GreatSPN All computed OK 138 26 806 Smallest Memory Footprint tedd-c = GreatSPN — — 2 Times tool wins 310 677 tedd-c > GreatSPN — — 14 Shortest Execution Time tedd-c < GreatSPN — — 1 Times tool wins 470 517 Do not compete 0 0 0 Error detected 0 3 0 Cannot Compute + Time-out 26 135 424

On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where tedd-c computed more values than GreatSPN, denote cases where tedd-c computed less values than GreatSPN, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

tedd-c wins when points are below the diagonal, GreatSPN wins when points are above the diagonal.

# tedd-c versus ITS-Tools

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 2822 runs (1411 for tedd-c and 1411 for ITS-Tools, so there are 1411 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing tedd-c to ITS-Tools are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

 Statistics on the executions tedd-c ITS-Tools Both tools tedd-c ITS-Tools All computed OK 139 30 0 Smallest Memory Footprint tedd-c = ITS-Tools — — 3 Times tool wins 350 641 tedd-c > ITS-Tools — — 819 Shortest Execution Time tedd-c < ITS-Tools — — 0 Times tool wins 757 234 Do not compete 0 0 0 Error detected 0 0 0 Cannot Compute + Time-out 30 139 420

On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where tedd-c computed more values than ITS-Tools, denote cases where tedd-c computed less values than ITS-Tools, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

tedd-c wins when points are below the diagonal, ITS-Tools wins when points are above the diagonal.

# tedd-c versus tedd-s

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 2822 runs (1411 for tedd-c and 1411 for tedd-s, so there are 1411 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing tedd-c to tedd-s are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

 Statistics on the executions tedd-c tedd-s Both tools tedd-c tedd-s All computed OK 11 1 947 Smallest Memory Footprint tedd-c = tedd-s — — 1 Times tool wins 547 415 tedd-c > tedd-s — — 2 Shortest Execution Time tedd-c < tedd-s — — 0 Times tool wins 482 480 Do not compete 0 0 0 Error detected 0 0 0 Cannot Compute + Time-out 1 11 449

On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where tedd-c computed more values than tedd-s, denote cases where tedd-c computed less values than tedd-s, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

tedd-c wins when points are below the diagonal, tedd-s wins when points are above the diagonal.

# tedd-c versus 2021-gold

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 2822 runs (1411 for tedd-c and 1411 for 2021-gold, so there are 1411 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing tedd-c to 2021-gold are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

 Statistics on the executions tedd-c 2021-gold Both tools tedd-c 2021-gold All computed OK 61 2 896 Smallest Memory Footprint tedd-c = 2021-gold — — 4 Times tool wins 764 199 tedd-c > 2021-gold — — 0 Shortest Execution Time tedd-c < 2021-gold — — 0 Times tool wins 755 208 Do not compete 0 0 0 Error detected 0 0 0 Cannot Compute + Time-out 2 61 448

On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where tedd-c computed more values than 2021-gold, denote cases where tedd-c computed less values than 2021-gold, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

tedd-c wins when points are below the diagonal, 2021-gold wins when points are above the diagonal.