About the Execution of ITS-Tools for SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
360.119 | 31997.00 | 49811.00 | 108.80 | FFTFFFTTFFFTFTTF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r312-tall-165472282900890.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-165472282900890
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 864K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Jun 7 17:04 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K Jun 7 17:04 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Jun 7 17:04 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K Jun 7 17:04 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Jun 6 15:31 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Jun 6 15:31 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Jun 6 15:31 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Jun 6 15:31 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 6 12:11 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Jun 7 17:05 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 124K Jun 7 17:05 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K Jun 7 17:05 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 39K Jun 7 17:05 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Jun 6 15:31 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:31 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 450K Jun 6 12:11 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1654951078843
Running Version 202205111006
[2022-06-11 12:37:59] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 134 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Transformed 1295 places.
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Transformed 749 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1295 places and 749 transitions in 242 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1036 places in 11 ms
Reduce places removed 1036 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 259 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 259/259 places, 749/749 transitions.
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 240 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 240 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 257 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 242 transition count 509
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 281 place count 218 transition count 470
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 218 transition count 470
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 311 place count 218 transition count 464
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 316 place count 213 transition count 459
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 213 transition count 459
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 213 transition count 457
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 324 place count 212 transition count 456
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 212 transition count 456
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 212 transition count 455
Applied a total of 326 rules in 57 ms. Remains 212 /259 variables (removed 47) and now considering 455/749 (removed 294) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 455 rows 212 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 24 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 257 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 455 rows 212 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 309 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 772 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1065 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 455 rows 212 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:01] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 187 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 212/259 places, 455/749 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 212/259 places, 455/749 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 212 places after structural reductions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 64 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 455 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2202 resets, run finished after 663 ms. (steps per millisecond=15 ) properties (out of 85) seen :7
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 ) properties (out of 78) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 78 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 62 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 110 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 94 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 101 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 77 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 455 rows 212 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:03] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:38:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:38:04] [INFO ] After 438ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:76
[2022-06-11 12:38:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:38:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:38:07] [INFO ] After 2667ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :24 sat :53
[2022-06-11 12:38:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 309 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:13] [INFO ] After 5409ms SMT Verify possible using 309 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :24 sat :53
[2022-06-11 12:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2022-06-11 12:38:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 120 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-06-11 12:38:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 91 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-06-11 12:38:18] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 100 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:19] [INFO ] After 11858ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :25 sat :52
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 6075 ms.
[2022-06-11 12:38:25] [INFO ] After 21233ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :25 sat :52
Fused 77 Parikh solutions to 52 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 769 ms.
Support contains 45 out of 212 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 455/455 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 787 edges and 212 vertex of which 211 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.10 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 211 transition count 453
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 197 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 197 transition count 437
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 197 transition count 434
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 189 transition count 426
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 189 transition count 426
Ensure Unique test removed 32 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 32 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 189 transition count 394
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 182 transition count 386
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 182 transition count 386
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 182 transition count 384
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 180 transition count 382
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 180 transition count 382
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 179 transition count 381
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 179 transition count 381
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 178 transition count 379
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 178 transition count 379
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 177 transition count 378
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 177 transition count 378
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 176 transition count 377
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 176 transition count 377
Applied a total of 110 rules in 111 ms. Remains 176 /212 variables (removed 36) and now considering 377/455 (removed 78) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 176/212 places, 377/455 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2245 resets, run finished after 471 ms. (steps per millisecond=21 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 109 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Probably explored full state space saw : 1737 states, properties seen :10
Probabilistic random walk after 4431 steps, saw 1737 distinct states, run finished after 91 ms. (steps per millisecond=48 ) properties seen :10
Explored full state space saw : 1737 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 4431 steps, saw 1737 distinct states, run finished after 74 ms. (steps per millisecond=59 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 65 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 5 formulas.
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 455 transitions.
Support contains 9 out of 212 places (down from 15) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 58 stabilizing places and 74 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 171 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 171 transition count 244
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 171 transition count 237
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 137 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 137 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 137 transition count 185
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 118 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 118 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 118 transition count 153
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 112 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 112 transition count 144
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 242 place count 107 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 107 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 104 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 104 transition count 135
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 102 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 102 transition count 133
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 259 place count 100 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 100 transition count 131
Applied a total of 261 rules in 25 ms. Remains 100 /212 variables (removed 112) and now considering 131/455 (removed 324) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 131 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 131 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 64 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 184 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 251 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 131 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 65 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/212 places, 131/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 100/212 places, 131/455 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 131 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9503098532543224055.gal : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15781396712831006681.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9503098532543224055.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15781396712831006681.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1035,0.1243,9948,2,1085,5,20258,6,0,531,6859,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX((((s1>=1)&&(l165>=1))||(((s1>=1)&&(l1197>=1))&&(((s1<1)||(l1203<1))||(l1190<1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX((((s1>=1)&&(l165>=1))||(((s1>=1)&&(l1197>=1))&&(((s1<1)||(l1203<1))||(l1190<1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t26, t27, t104, t105, t106, t107, t108, t109, t110, t113, t116, Intersection with reachable ...226
(forward)formula 0,0,0.528306,24200,1,0,234,70323,211,134,2776,51272,316
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 169 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 169 transition count 218
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 169 transition count 211
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 133 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 133 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 133 transition count 159
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 111 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 111 transition count 135
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 111 transition count 124
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 103 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 103 transition count 113
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 259 place count 96 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 96 transition count 106
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 91 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 91 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 91 transition count 98
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 282 place count 87 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 87 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 287 place count 86 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 86 transition count 93
Applied a total of 288 rules in 28 ms. Remains 86 /212 variables (removed 126) and now considering 93/455 (removed 362) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 86 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 86 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 119 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 86 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 49 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/212 places, 93/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 86/212 places, 93/455 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability584921847562856981.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17739121192016011154.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability584921847562856981.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17739121192016011154.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,981,0.058057,7328,2,1046,5,9287,6,0,437,4098,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((s1>=1)&&(l165>=1)) U !(EG(!(((p34>=1)&&(l221>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(((p34>=1)&&(l221>=1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(((p34>=1)&&(l221>=1)))))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l1...214
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t26, t27, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t78, t82, Intersection with reachable at each s...216
(forward)formula 0,0,0.269738,16744,1,0,155,44223,176,69,2450,27443,228
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 169 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 169 transition count 216
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 169 transition count 209
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 133 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 133 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 133 transition count 158
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 202 place count 111 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 111 transition count 135
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 111 transition count 124
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 243 place count 103 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 103 transition count 113
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 96 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 96 transition count 106
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 270 place count 91 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 91 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 91 transition count 98
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 282 place count 86 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 86 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 290 place count 83 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 83 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 294 place count 82 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 82 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 296 place count 81 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 81 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 298 place count 80 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 80 transition count 86
Applied a total of 299 rules in 11 ms. Remains 80 /212 variables (removed 132) and now considering 86/455 (removed 369) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 80 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 80 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 167 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 80 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 50 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/212 places, 86/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 80/212 places, 86/455 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5326377394893289987.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14288536654228508896.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5326377394893289987.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14288536654228508896.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,987,0.049977,7264,2,827,5,8728,6,0,406,3671,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX(FALSE)) * EF((((s1<1)||(l917<1))&&((s1<1)||(l151<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U !(EX(!(FALSE))))),TRUE) * (((s1<1)||(l917<1))&&((s1<1)||(l151<1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t73, t74, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (d...200
(forward)formula 0,1,0.184166,12984,1,0,97,31930,162,54,2356,15530,157
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 168 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 168 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 168 transition count 208
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 131 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 131 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 131 transition count 156
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 108 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 108 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 108 transition count 119
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 100 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 100 transition count 108
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 265 place count 93 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 93 transition count 101
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 277 place count 88 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 88 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 88 transition count 93
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 289 place count 83 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 83 transition count 88
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 297 place count 80 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 80 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 301 place count 79 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 79 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 78 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 78 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 305 place count 77 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 77 transition count 81
Applied a total of 306 rules in 10 ms. Remains 77 /212 variables (removed 135) and now considering 81/455 (removed 374) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 47 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/212 places, 81/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 77/212 places, 81/455 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3173256287020903580.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5349517468122998213.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3173256287020903580.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5349517468122998213.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,915,0.046462,7016,2,818,5,8121,6,0,389,3567,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(TRUE))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t69, t70, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (d...200
(forward)formula 0,0,0.238926,15108,1,0,131,39471,155,54,2278,22391,188
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 168 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 168 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 168 transition count 208
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 131 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 131 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 131 transition count 156
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 108 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 108 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 108 transition count 119
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 100 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 100 transition count 108
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 265 place count 93 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 93 transition count 101
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 277 place count 88 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 88 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 88 transition count 93
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 289 place count 83 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 83 transition count 88
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 297 place count 80 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 80 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 301 place count 79 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 79 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 78 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 78 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 305 place count 77 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 77 transition count 81
Applied a total of 306 rules in 10 ms. Remains 77 /212 variables (removed 135) and now considering 81/455 (removed 374) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 55 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/212 places, 81/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 77/212 places, 81/455 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6837629637558930556.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14519553746309534904.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6837629637558930556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14519553746309534904.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,915,0.04643,6892,2,818,5,8121,6,0,389,3567,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.047603,6892,1,0,6,8121,7,1,519,3567,1
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Total runtime 30792 ms.
BK_STOP 1654951110840
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-165472282900890"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04.tgz
mv SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;