fond
Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
Execution of r312-tall-165472282900890
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
360.119 31997.00 49811.00 108.80 FFTFFFTTFFFTFTTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r312-tall-165472282900890.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-165472282900890
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 864K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Jun 7 17:04 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K Jun 7 17:04 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Jun 7 17:04 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K Jun 7 17:04 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Jun 6 15:31 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Jun 6 15:31 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Jun 6 15:31 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Jun 6 15:31 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 6 12:11 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Jun 7 17:05 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 124K Jun 7 17:05 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K Jun 7 17:05 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 39K Jun 7 17:05 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Jun 6 15:31 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:31 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 450K Jun 6 12:11 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1654951078843

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-06-11 12:37:59] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 134 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Transformed 1295 places.
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Transformed 749 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1295 places and 749 transitions in 242 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1036 places in 11 ms
Reduce places removed 1036 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 259 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 259/259 places, 749/749 transitions.
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 240 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 240 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 257 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 242 transition count 509
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 281 place count 218 transition count 470
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 218 transition count 470
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 311 place count 218 transition count 464
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 316 place count 213 transition count 459
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 213 transition count 459
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 213 transition count 457
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 324 place count 212 transition count 456
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 212 transition count 456
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 212 transition count 455
Applied a total of 326 rules in 57 ms. Remains 212 /259 variables (removed 47) and now considering 455/749 (removed 294) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 455 rows 212 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 24 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 257 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 455 rows 212 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 309 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 772 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1065 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 455 rows 212 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:01] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 187 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 212/259 places, 455/749 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 212/259 places, 455/749 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 212 places after structural reductions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 64 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 455 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2202 resets, run finished after 663 ms. (steps per millisecond=15 ) properties (out of 85) seen :7
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 78) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 ) properties (out of 78) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 78 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 62 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 110 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 94 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 101 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 77) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 77 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 455 rows 212 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:03] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:38:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:38:04] [INFO ] After 438ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:76
[2022-06-11 12:38:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:38:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:38:07] [INFO ] After 2667ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :24 sat :53
[2022-06-11 12:38:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 309 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:13] [INFO ] After 5409ms SMT Verify possible using 309 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :24 sat :53
[2022-06-11 12:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2022-06-11 12:38:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 120 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-06-11 12:38:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 91 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-06-11 12:38:18] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 100 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:19] [INFO ] After 11858ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :25 sat :52
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 6075 ms.
[2022-06-11 12:38:25] [INFO ] After 21233ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :25 sat :52
Fused 77 Parikh solutions to 52 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 769 ms.
Support contains 45 out of 212 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 455/455 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 787 edges and 212 vertex of which 211 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.10 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 211 transition count 453
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 197 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 197 transition count 437
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 197 transition count 434
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 189 transition count 426
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 189 transition count 426
Ensure Unique test removed 32 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 32 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 189 transition count 394
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 182 transition count 386
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 182 transition count 386
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 182 transition count 384
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 180 transition count 382
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 180 transition count 382
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 179 transition count 381
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 179 transition count 381
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 178 transition count 379
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 178 transition count 379
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 177 transition count 378
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 177 transition count 378
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 176 transition count 377
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 176 transition count 377
Applied a total of 110 rules in 111 ms. Remains 176 /212 variables (removed 36) and now considering 377/455 (removed 78) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 176/212 places, 377/455 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2245 resets, run finished after 471 ms. (steps per millisecond=21 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 109 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Probably explored full state space saw : 1737 states, properties seen :10
Probabilistic random walk after 4431 steps, saw 1737 distinct states, run finished after 91 ms. (steps per millisecond=48 ) properties seen :10
Explored full state space saw : 1737 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 4431 steps, saw 1737 distinct states, run finished after 74 ms. (steps per millisecond=59 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 65 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 5 formulas.
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 455 transitions.
Support contains 9 out of 212 places (down from 15) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 58 stabilizing places and 74 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 171 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 171 transition count 244
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 171 transition count 237
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 137 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 137 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 137 transition count 185
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 118 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 118 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 118 transition count 153
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 112 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 112 transition count 144
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 242 place count 107 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 107 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 104 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 104 transition count 135
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 102 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 102 transition count 133
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 259 place count 100 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 100 transition count 131
Applied a total of 261 rules in 25 ms. Remains 100 /212 variables (removed 112) and now considering 131/455 (removed 324) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 131 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 131 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 64 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 184 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 251 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 131 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 65 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/212 places, 131/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 100/212 places, 131/455 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 131 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9503098532543224055.gal : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15781396712831006681.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9503098532543224055.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15781396712831006681.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1035,0.1243,9948,2,1085,5,20258,6,0,531,6859,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX((((s1>=1)&&(l165>=1))||(((s1>=1)&&(l1197>=1))&&(((s1<1)||(l1203<1))||(l1190<1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX((((s1>=1)&&(l165>=1))||(((s1>=1)&&(l1197>=1))&&(((s1<1)||(l1203<1))||(l1190<1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t26, t27, t104, t105, t106, t107, t108, t109, t110, t113, t116, Intersection with reachable ...226
(forward)formula 0,0,0.528306,24200,1,0,234,70323,211,134,2776,51272,316
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 169 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 169 transition count 218
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 169 transition count 211
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 133 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 133 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 133 transition count 159
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 111 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 111 transition count 135
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 111 transition count 124
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 103 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 103 transition count 113
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 259 place count 96 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 96 transition count 106
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 91 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 91 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 91 transition count 98
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 282 place count 87 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 87 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 287 place count 86 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 86 transition count 93
Applied a total of 288 rules in 28 ms. Remains 86 /212 variables (removed 126) and now considering 93/455 (removed 362) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 86 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 86 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:28] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 119 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 86 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 49 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/212 places, 93/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 86/212 places, 93/455 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability584921847562856981.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17739121192016011154.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability584921847562856981.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17739121192016011154.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,981,0.058057,7328,2,1046,5,9287,6,0,437,4098,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((s1>=1)&&(l165>=1)) U !(EG(!(((p34>=1)&&(l221>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(((p34>=1)&&(l221>=1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(((p34>=1)&&(l221>=1)))))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l1...214
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t26, t27, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t78, t82, Intersection with reachable at each s...216
(forward)formula 0,0,0.269738,16744,1,0,155,44223,176,69,2450,27443,228
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 169 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 169 transition count 216
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 169 transition count 209
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 133 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 133 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 133 transition count 158
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 202 place count 111 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 111 transition count 135
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 111 transition count 124
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 243 place count 103 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 103 transition count 113
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 96 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 96 transition count 106
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 270 place count 91 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 91 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 91 transition count 98
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 282 place count 86 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 86 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 290 place count 83 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 83 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 294 place count 82 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 82 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 296 place count 81 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 81 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 298 place count 80 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 80 transition count 86
Applied a total of 299 rules in 11 ms. Remains 80 /212 variables (removed 132) and now considering 86/455 (removed 369) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 80 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 80 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 167 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 80 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 50 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/212 places, 86/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 80/212 places, 86/455 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5326377394893289987.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14288536654228508896.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5326377394893289987.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14288536654228508896.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,987,0.049977,7264,2,827,5,8728,6,0,406,3671,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX(FALSE)) * EF((((s1<1)||(l917<1))&&((s1<1)||(l151<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U !(EX(!(FALSE))))),TRUE) * (((s1<1)||(l917<1))&&((s1<1)||(l151<1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t73, t74, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (d...200
(forward)formula 0,1,0.184166,12984,1,0,97,31930,162,54,2356,15530,157
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 168 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 168 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 168 transition count 208
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 131 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 131 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 131 transition count 156
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 108 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 108 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 108 transition count 119
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 100 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 100 transition count 108
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 265 place count 93 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 93 transition count 101
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 277 place count 88 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 88 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 88 transition count 93
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 289 place count 83 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 83 transition count 88
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 297 place count 80 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 80 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 301 place count 79 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 79 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 78 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 78 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 305 place count 77 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 77 transition count 81
Applied a total of 306 rules in 10 ms. Remains 77 /212 variables (removed 135) and now considering 81/455 (removed 374) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 47 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/212 places, 81/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 77/212 places, 81/455 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3173256287020903580.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5349517468122998213.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3173256287020903580.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5349517468122998213.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,915,0.046462,7016,2,818,5,8121,6,0,389,3567,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(TRUE))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t69, t70, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (d...200
(forward)formula 0,0,0.238926,15108,1,0,131,39471,155,54,2278,22391,188
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 455/455 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 168 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 168 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 168 transition count 208
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 131 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 131 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 131 transition count 156
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 108 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 108 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 108 transition count 119
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 100 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 100 transition count 108
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 265 place count 93 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 93 transition count 101
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 277 place count 88 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 88 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 88 transition count 93
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 289 place count 83 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 83 transition count 88
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 297 place count 80 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 80 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 301 place count 79 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 79 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 78 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 78 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 305 place count 77 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 77 transition count 81
Applied a total of 306 rules in 10 ms. Remains 77 /212 variables (removed 135) and now considering 81/455 (removed 374) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 55 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/212 places, 81/455 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 77/212 places, 81/455 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6837629637558930556.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14519553746309534904.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6837629637558930556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14519553746309534904.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,915,0.04643,6892,2,818,5,8121,6,0,389,3567,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.047603,6892,1,0,6,8121,7,1,519,3567,1
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-06-11 12:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Total runtime 30792 ms.

BK_STOP 1654951110840

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-165472282900890"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04.tgz
mv SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;