Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r312-tall-165472282800850.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-165472282800850
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 504K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Jun 7 17:01 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K Jun 7 17:01 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K Jun 7 17:00 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K Jun 7 17:00 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Jun 6 15:31 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Jun 6 15:31 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Jun 6 15:31 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Jun 6 15:31 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 6 12:11 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Jun 7 17:01 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 140K Jun 7 17:01 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Jun 7 17:01 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Jun 7 17:01 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Jun 6 15:31 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:31 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K Jun 6 12:11 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1654944687819

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-06-11 10:51:28] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 83 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Transformed 262 places.
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Transformed 73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 262 places and 73 transitions in 184 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 190 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 190 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 55 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 73/73 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 70 transition count 73
Applied a total of 2 rules in 10 ms. Remains 70 /72 variables (removed 2) and now considering 73/73 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 12 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 270 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 75 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/72 places, 73/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 70/72 places, 73/73 transitions.
Support contains 55 out of 70 places after structural reductions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2216 resets, run finished after 772 ms. (steps per millisecond=12 ) properties (out of 53) seen :17
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 113 resets, run finished after 30 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 36) seen :5
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 30 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 34 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 31) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 29 ms. (steps per millisecond=34 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 69 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 107 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 102 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 105 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 30 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:31] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 9 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 10:51:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 10:51:31] [INFO ] After 266ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:30
[2022-06-11 10:51:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 10:51:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 10:51:31] [INFO ] After 206ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :26
[2022-06-11 10:51:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:32] [INFO ] After 228ms SMT Verify possible using 31 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :26
[2022-06-11 10:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2022-06-11 10:51:32] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 54 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-06-11 10:51:32] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 52 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:32] [INFO ] After 718ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :25
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 228 ms.
[2022-06-11 10:51:32] [INFO ] After 1352ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :25
Fused 30 Parikh solutions to 25 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 138 ms.
Support contains 34 out of 70 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 68 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 68 transition count 71
Applied a total of 4 rules in 16 ms. Remains 68 /70 variables (removed 2) and now considering 71/73 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 68/70 places, 71/73 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2240 resets, run finished after 240 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 25) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 25) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 25) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 25) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 25) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 113 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 71 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 92 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 119 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Probably explored full state space saw : 25991 states, properties seen :23
Probabilistic random walk after 67344 steps, saw 25991 distinct states, run finished after 146 ms. (steps per millisecond=461 ) properties seen :23
Explored full state space saw : 25991 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 67344 steps, saw 25991 distinct states, run finished after 53 ms. (steps per millisecond=1270 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 6 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
Computed a total of 10 stabilizing places and 10 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 64 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 64 transition count 67
Applied a total of 12 rules in 9 ms. Remains 64 /70 variables (removed 6) and now considering 67/73 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 64 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 64 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 64 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 48 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/70 places, 67/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 64/70 places, 67/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability916838936664505528.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16964768144646142669.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability916838936664505528.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16964768144646142669.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20972,0.211471,13364,2,1992,5,30356,6,0,323,18565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((p14<1)||(l65<1))) * E(A((A(E(((s1>=1)&&(l70>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l209>=1))) U !(((p16>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) * EF(((s1>=1)&&(l21>=1)))) U ((!...385
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * EG(((p14<1)||(l65<1)))),!((E(!(((!(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l64>=1)))))) + !((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l42>=...1182
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t24, t44, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t64, ...258
(forward)formula 0,0,1.32712,46028,1,0,327,220963,162,142,2147,149840,360
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 64 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 64 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 63 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 63 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 62 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 62 transition count 64
Applied a total of 17 rules in 8 ms. Remains 62 /70 variables (removed 8) and now considering 64/73 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 62 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 62 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 62 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 38 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/70 places, 64/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 62/70 places, 64/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17074634431790543900.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12014079932259909873.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17074634431790543900.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12014079932259909873.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,23705,0.137676,10204,2,1991,5,24328,6,0,312,14745,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF(AG(!(((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l234>=1))) * (p13>=1)) * (l0>=1))))) U !(((!((AF(((s1>=1)&&(l234>=1))) * AG(((p16>=1)&&(l0>=1))))) * (!(AF(((s1...229
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(((!((!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l234>=1))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p16>=1)&&(l0>=1))))))) * (!(!(EG(!(((s1>...704
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t30, t41, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t61, t63, In...250
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.84542,63920,1,0,537,332453,177,266,2142,238502,652
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 64 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 64 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 63 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 63 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 62 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 62 transition count 64
Applied a total of 17 rules in 6 ms. Remains 62 /70 variables (removed 8) and now considering 64/73 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 62 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 62 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 62 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 37 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/70 places, 64/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 62/70 places, 64/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17069881897021093554.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6523838115269665332.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17069881897021093554.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6523838115269665332.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,23705,0.110715,9432,2,1783,5,19673,6,0,312,11284,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(AX(!((AG(((p10>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + (!(((s1>=1)&&(l129>=1))) * AG(((s1>=1)&&(l127>=1))))))) U (((s1>=1)&&(l79>=1)) + ((EG(((!((s1>=1)&&(l1...410
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(((FwdU(Init,!((((s1>=1)&&(l79>=1)) + ((EG(((!((s1>=1)&&(l127>=1)))||(!((s1>=1)&&(l210>=1))))) * !(!((E(!((...2567
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t17, t31, t42, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t61, t63,...254
(forward)formula 0,0,1.76906,64024,1,0,794,324124,170,437,2031,252851,831
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 63 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 63 transition count 66
Applied a total of 14 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /70 variables (removed 7) and now considering 66/73 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/70 places, 66/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/70 places, 66/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14357770919289964802.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9501152509692318596.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14357770919289964802.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9501152509692318596.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20974,0.100663,9296,2,2015,5,15973,6,0,318,11258,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l127>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l234>=1))) U AG(E((((s1>=1)&&(l68>=1))&&(l129>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l24>=1))))) U EF((AX(((p22>=1)...198
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E((((s1>=1)&&(l68>=1))&&(l129>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l24>=1))))))) U (!((!...457
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t10, t44, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t63, t65, ...253
(forward)formula 0,0,1.11979,44004,1,0,340,200684,171,154,2185,149368,381
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 61 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 61 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 60 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 60 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 59 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 59 transition count 62
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 59 transition count 61
Applied a total of 23 rules in 7 ms. Remains 59 /70 variables (removed 11) and now considering 61/73 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 39 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/70 places, 61/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 59/70 places, 61/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6035129819472298390.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16061323614586646610.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6035129819472298390.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16061323614586646610.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19185,0.120089,9796,2,1685,5,20895,6,0,297,12216,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EF(((s1<1)||(l90<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l90<1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t58, t60, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,1,0.58477,24936,1,0,160,80065,147,60,2025,58384,182
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 61 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 61 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 60 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 60 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 59 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 59 transition count 62
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 59 transition count 61
Applied a total of 23 rules in 5 ms. Remains 59 /70 variables (removed 11) and now considering 61/73 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 37 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/70 places, 61/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 59/70 places, 61/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3354983152776486061.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1172794899143542289.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3354983152776486061.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1172794899143542289.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19185,0.119819,9584,2,1685,5,20895,6,0,297,12216,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX(AG(AX(((s1<1)||(l202<1))))) + E(EX(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l55>=1)))) U !(((!(((s1>=1)&&(l202>=1))) + AX(((s2>=1)&&(l65>=1)))) * !((((s1>=1)...195
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(Init)) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l202<1)))))))))] != FALSE + ([(EY((FwdU(EY(Init),EX(!(EX(!(((s1>...353
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t58, t60, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,1,0.422699,19368,1,0,148,73458,144,75,1996,44148,176
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 62 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 61 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 61 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 60 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 60 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 60 transition count 62
Applied a total of 21 rules in 9 ms. Remains 60 /70 variables (removed 10) and now considering 62/73 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 38 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/70 places, 62/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 60/70 places, 62/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability245929214113908206.gal : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15771905648414755650.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability245929214113908206.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15771905648414755650.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,23705,0.131136,9796,2,1770,5,22129,6,0,302,13547,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(A(((s1>=1)&&(l209>=1)) U A(((s1>=1)&&(l204>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l66>=1)))) U EF(AG(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l79>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l79>=1))))))))))) * !(!((E(!(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&...690
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t30, t41, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t59, t61, Intersection...240
(forward)formula 0,1,0.734232,27172,1,0,211,103134,152,66,2007,77438,236
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 62 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 61 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 61 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 60 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 60 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 60 transition count 62
Applied a total of 21 rules in 14 ms. Remains 60 /70 variables (removed 10) and now considering 62/73 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 43 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/70 places, 62/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 60/70 places, 62/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17239642276294154527.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12384389143688448184.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17239642276294154527.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12384389143688448184.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19185,0.110161,9536,2,1895,5,18392,6,0,302,12098,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EF(((p10<1)||(l0<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((p10<1)||(l0<1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t59, t61, Intersection...240
(forward)formula 0,1,0.46307,21468,1,0,162,73459,151,59,2001,49946,184
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 61 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 61 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 60 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 60 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 59 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 59 transition count 62
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 59 transition count 61
Applied a total of 23 rules in 10 ms. Remains 59 /70 variables (removed 11) and now considering 61/73 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 36 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/70 places, 61/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 59/70 places, 61/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2959735493487665561.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16046228713174205698.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2959735493487665561.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16046228713174205698.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19185,0.118636,9952,2,1685,5,20895,6,0,297,12216,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(AX(AX(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l235>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l235>=1)))))))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t58, t60, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,0,1.12988,41764,1,0,602,220006,149,245,1940,131554,731
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 63 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 63 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 62 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 61 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 61 transition count 64
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 61 transition count 63
Applied a total of 19 rules in 6 ms. Remains 61 /70 variables (removed 9) and now considering 63/73 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 54 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/70 places, 63/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 61/70 places, 63/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11804449992169984065.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9020504948846226184.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11804449992169984065.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9020504948846226184.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,23705,0.13813,10600,2,1780,5,24996,6,0,307,15017,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(AG((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l204>=1))) + (!(((s1>=1)&&(l234>=1))) * E(((s1>=1)&&(l90>=1)) U !(((s1<1)||(l235<1))))))) U AG(!(((p16>=1)&&(l0>=1...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(((p16>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))))) * !(!(E(TRUE U !((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l204>=1...356
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t30, t41, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t60, t62, Interse...245
(forward)formula 0,0,0.849287,32808,1,0,248,140774,153,85,2014,99882,278
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 61 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 61 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 60 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 60 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 59 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 59 transition count 62
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 59 transition count 61
Applied a total of 23 rules in 3 ms. Remains 59 /70 variables (removed 11) and now considering 61/73 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 37 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/70 places, 61/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 59/70 places, 61/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11162570510927320827.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12418173848074775750.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11162570510927320827.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12418173848074775750.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19185,0.118159,9624,2,1685,5,20895,6,0,297,12216,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l90>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l90>=1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t58, t60, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,1,0.99163,38736,1,0,481,173708,149,271,1957,155050,416
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 63 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 63 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 62 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 61 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 61 transition count 64
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 61 transition count 63
Applied a total of 19 rules in 3 ms. Remains 61 /70 variables (removed 9) and now considering 63/73 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 35 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/70 places, 63/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 61/70 places, 63/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8173561948702543943.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14475126391789877035.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8173561948702543943.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14475126391789877035.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19185,0.108057,9592,2,1932,5,18375,6,0,307,12183,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(A(!(E(((p10>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((p12>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) U EX(((s1>=1)&&(l208>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l208>=1)))) U (!(!(E(((p10>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((p12>=1)&&(l0>...244
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t60, t62, Interse...245
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.50604,53388,1,0,751,279448,160,458,2103,182230,822
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 62 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 61 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 61 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 60 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 60 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 60 transition count 62
Applied a total of 21 rules in 2 ms. Remains 60 /70 variables (removed 10) and now considering 62/73 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 39 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/70 places, 62/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 60/70 places, 62/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1344778400982721736.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13775264510664795740.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1344778400982721736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13775264510664795740.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19185,0.142214,10592,2,1757,5,25764,6,0,302,14593,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((AF(((p20<1)||(l0<1))) + AX(((s8>=1)&&(l0>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((!(EG(!(((p20<1)||(l0<1))))) + !(EX(!(((s8>=1)&&(l0>=1))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t58, t59, t61, Intersection...240
(forward)formula 0,1,0.589513,24760,1,0,164,79095,156,64,2006,58154,189
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 70/70 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 65 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 65 transition count 68
Applied a total of 10 rules in 1 ms. Remains 65 /70 variables (removed 5) and now considering 68/73 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 65 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 65 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 65 cols
[2022-06-11 10:51:49] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:50] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 62 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/70 places, 68/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 65/70 places, 68/73 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2022-06-11 10:51:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11906101051100106142.gal : 18 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1224664917069511653.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11906101051100106142.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1224664917069511653.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19969,0.169454,9544,2,2051,5,15758,6,0,328,11873,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((E((((s2>=1)&&(l65>=1)) + EX(((s0>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) U (E(!(((s1<1)||(l235<1))) U ((p15>=1)&&(l128>=1))) * ((A(((s7>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s1...494
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * !(E(TRUE U (((EG((((p11>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l86>=1)))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l110>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(...912
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t10, t19, t25, t45, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t58, t59, t60, t6...276
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,2.81404,85852,1,0,1387,500035,210,632,2217,370948,1725
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2022-06-11 10:51:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 10:51:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 23989 ms.

BK_STOP 1654944713050

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-165472282800850"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06.tgz
mv SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d0m06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;