Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r312-tall-165472281900202.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281900202
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 868K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K Jun 7 17:12 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K Jun 7 17:12 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K Jun 7 17:11 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K Jun 7 17:11 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:24 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Jun 6 15:24 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Jun 6 15:24 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Jun 6 15:24 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 6 12:11 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Jun 7 17:13 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 121K Jun 7 17:13 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K Jun 7 17:12 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K Jun 7 17:12 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Jun 6 15:24 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:24 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 432K Jun 6 12:11 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1654776598749

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-06-09 12:09:59] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-06-09 12:09:59] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-06-09 12:10:00] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 132 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:00] [INFO ] Transformed 1440 places.
[2022-06-09 12:10:00] [INFO ] Transformed 672 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:10:00] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1440 places and 672 transitions in 239 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1093 places in 13 ms
Reduce places removed 1093 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 66 out of 347 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 347/347 places, 672/672 transitions.
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 80 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 80 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 101 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 326 transition count 592
Discarding 68 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 68 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 258 transition count 503
Iterating global reduction 1 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 258 transition count 503
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 258 transition count 485
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 301 place count 212 transition count 439
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 212 transition count 439
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 212 transition count 438
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 365 place count 195 transition count 419
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 195 transition count 419
Ensure Unique test removed 22 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 22 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 195 transition count 397
Applied a total of 404 rules in 81 ms. Remains 195 /347 variables (removed 152) and now considering 397/672 (removed 275) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 397 rows 195 cols
[2022-06-09 12:10:00] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 19 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 255 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 397 rows 195 cols
[2022-06-09 12:10:00] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 225 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:10:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 559 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 840 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 397 rows 195 cols
[2022-06-09 12:10:01] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 168 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 195/347 places, 397/672 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 195/347 places, 397/672 transitions.
Support contains 66 out of 195 places after structural reductions.
[2022-06-09 12:10:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 397 transitions.
Support contains 64 out of 195 places (down from 66) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2319 resets, run finished after 577 ms. (steps per millisecond=17 ) properties (out of 55) seen :9
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 33 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 96 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 90 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 46) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 151 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 91 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 59 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 84 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 53 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 35 ms. (steps per millisecond=28 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 45) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 44) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 44) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 44 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 397 rows 195 cols
[2022-06-09 12:10:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 12:10:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 12:10:04] [INFO ] After 1034ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:43
[2022-06-09 12:10:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 12:10:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 12:10:06] [INFO ] After 1734ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :42
[2022-06-09 12:10:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 225 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:10:09] [INFO ] After 2943ms SMT Verify possible using 225 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :42
[2022-06-09 12:10:12] [INFO ] After 6523ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :42
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 2863 ms.
[2022-06-09 12:10:15] [INFO ] After 11481ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :42
Fused 44 Parikh solutions to 42 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 679 ms.
Support contains 49 out of 195 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 187 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 187 transition count 368
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 187 transition count 360
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 181 transition count 352
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 181 transition count 352
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 179 transition count 349
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 179 transition count 349
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 179 transition count 345
Applied a total of 44 rules in 54 ms. Remains 179 /195 variables (removed 16) and now considering 345/397 (removed 52) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 179/195 places, 345/397 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2292 resets, run finished after 405 ms. (steps per millisecond=24 ) properties (out of 41) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 34 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 34 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 102 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 102 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 93 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 113 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 217846 steps, run visited all 40 properties in 979 ms. (steps per millisecond=222 )
Probabilistic random walk after 217846 steps, saw 84708 distinct states, run finished after 979 ms. (steps per millisecond=222 ) properties seen :40
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 397 transitions.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 163 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 163 transition count 272
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 163 transition count 259
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 140 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 140 transition count 229
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 140 transition count 224
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 126 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 126 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 126 transition count 199
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 120 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 120 transition count 189
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 120 transition count 184
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 118 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 118 transition count 182
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 117 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 117 transition count 181
Applied a total of 186 rules in 13 ms. Remains 117 /195 variables (removed 78) and now considering 181/397 (removed 216) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 117 cols
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 117 cols
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 77 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 215 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 307 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 117 cols
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 76 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/195 places, 181/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 117/195 places, 181/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 181 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5171432514878860606.gal : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14786078918915237999.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5171432514878860606.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14786078918915237999.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91386e+06,16,389564,2,40197,5,1.02318e+06,6,0,649,1.08876e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(!(A(EF((((s1>=1)&&(l1219>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1221>=1)))) U ((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l970>=1))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l448>=1)))) * A(((s1>=1)&&(l318>=1...349
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY((Init * !((E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l445>=1))) * EX((!(E((((s1>=1)&&(l1022>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1232>=1))) U (((s1...834
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t19, t20, t30, t31, t32, t34, t39, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t...770
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 12:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 12:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5433020323209479159.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5433020323209479159.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5433020323209479159.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5433020323209479159.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5433020323209479159.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 12:10:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 12:10:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 12:10:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 204 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 125 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2022-06-09 12:10:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability243732701156252685.gal : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:10:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12386795674977662961.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability243732701156252685.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12386795674977662961.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 159 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 159 transition count 243
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 159 transition count 237
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 132 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 132 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 132 transition count 201
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 157 place count 112 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 112 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 112 transition count 163
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 103 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 103 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 103 transition count 144
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 96 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 96 transition count 136
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 225 place count 92 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 92 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 92 transition count 129
Applied a total of 232 rules in 18 ms. Remains 92 /195 variables (removed 103) and now considering 129/397 (removed 268) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 92 cols
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 92 cols
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 48 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 367 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 462 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 92 cols
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 24 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 92 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/195 places, 129/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 92/195 places, 129/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 129 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2140992253608837593.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8834066578766342173.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2140992253608837593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8834066578766342173.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,822488,3.55637,93132,2,15190,5,277079,6,0,497,291447,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(A(!(EF(((p11>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) U (AX(((s1>=1)&&(l606>=1))) + ((p119>=1)&&(l531>=1))))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l306>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX(!((E(!((!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l606>=1))))) + ((p119>=1)&&(l531>=1)))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U ((p11>=1)&&(l0>...332
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t...532
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,29.7176,635264,1,0,418,3.39444e+06,295,188,3619,2.33708e+06,463
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 157 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 157 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 157 transition count 233
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 130 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 130 transition count 199
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 130 transition count 195
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 111 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 111 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 111 transition count 160
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 103 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 103 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 103 transition count 144
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 211 place count 97 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 97 transition count 137
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 221 place count 93 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 93 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 93 transition count 126
Applied a total of 227 rules in 13 ms. Remains 93 /195 variables (removed 102) and now considering 126/397 (removed 271) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 188 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/195 places, 126/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 93/195 places, 126/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7353675010283602972.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:11:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7268681953512750239.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7353675010283602972.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7268681953512750239.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,982237,4.76965,122084,2,14359,5,425305,6,0,498,345728,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((s1>=1)&&(l1282>=1)) + ((EG(AX(((s1<1)||(l1<1)))) * (s1>=1)) * (l1021>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((s1>=1)&&(l1282>=1)) + ((EG(!(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l1<1)))))) * (s1>=1)) * (l1021>=1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t50, t55, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t77, t82, t83, t...469
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,26.6067,660728,1,0,557,3.25357e+06,284,320,3482,2.79658e+06,538
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 158 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 158 transition count 247
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 158 transition count 239
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 130 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 130 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 130 transition count 198
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 164 place count 110 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 110 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 110 transition count 161
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 202 place count 101 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 101 transition count 147
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 101 transition count 144
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 220 place count 95 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 95 transition count 137
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 230 place count 91 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 91 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 91 transition count 125
Applied a total of 237 rules in 86 ms. Remains 91 /195 variables (removed 104) and now considering 125/397 (removed 272) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 91 cols
[2022-06-09 12:12:16] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 91 cols
[2022-06-09 12:12:16] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:12:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 198 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:12:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 91 cols
[2022-06-09 12:12:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 66 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/195 places, 125/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 91/195 places, 125/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:12:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:12:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17065632981196430218.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8968031199616687005.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17065632981196430218.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8968031199616687005.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,967104,4.76284,136172,2,15897,5,415377,6,0,489,457886,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((s1>=1)&&(l36>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1232>=1))) U EF(!(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l612>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l612>=1))))))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l612>=1)...274
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t65,...525
(forward)formula 0,1,17.8598,418916,1,0,341,2.149e+06,280,131,3425,1.43326e+06,381
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 157 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 157 transition count 243
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 157 transition count 233
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 129 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 129 transition count 198
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 129 transition count 192
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 109 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 109 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 109 transition count 157
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 99 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 99 transition count 139
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 99 transition count 134
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 227 place count 93 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 93 transition count 127
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 237 place count 89 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 89 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 89 transition count 116
Applied a total of 243 rules in 8 ms. Remains 89 /195 variables (removed 106) and now considering 116/397 (removed 281) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 41 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 54 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/195 places, 116/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 89/195 places, 116/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16153239121144693313.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11609704484164595558.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16153239121144693313.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11609704484164595558.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,718117,2.77449,79220,2,13270,5,225150,6,0,472,266341,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l1219>=1))) + AF(EG(!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l608>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l608>=1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1219>=1))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l608>=1)) U ((s...190
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t57, t59, t61, t76, t...434
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,20.264,463288,1,0,422,2.28118e+06,264,213,3354,1.78384e+06,456
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 159 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 159 transition count 246
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 159 transition count 236
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 133 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 133 transition count 208
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 133 transition count 202
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 115 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 115 transition count 177
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 115 transition count 169
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 107 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 107 transition count 153
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 107 transition count 149
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 102 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 102 transition count 143
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 217 place count 99 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 99 transition count 140
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 99 transition count 138
Applied a total of 222 rules in 14 ms. Remains 99 /195 variables (removed 96) and now considering 138/397 (removed 259) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 99 cols
[2022-06-09 12:12:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 99 cols
[2022-06-09 12:12:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 51 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:12:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 202 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 99 cols
[2022-06-09 12:12:56] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 59 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/195 places, 138/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 99/195 places, 138/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1695405353814862177.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:12:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14881594657889889410.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1695405353814862177.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14881594657889889410.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.31186e+06,5.7421,165484,2,20764,5,478158,6,0,534,604493,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(((EX(A(((s1>=1)&&(l1219>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1)))) * AG((((s1>=1)&&(l1305>=1))||((p52>=1)&&(l620>=1))))) + ((A(!(((s1>=1)&&(l121...216
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * EX(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l1219>=1))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1))))...462
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t28, t30, t44, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t...554
(forward)formula 0,1,19.1187,431088,1,0,320,1.48614e+06,311,124,3867,1.44373e+06,356
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 158 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 158 transition count 248
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 158 transition count 238
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 131 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 131 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 131 transition count 200
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 161 place count 112 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 112 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 112 transition count 167
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 197 place count 103 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 103 transition count 151
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 103 transition count 148
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 215 place count 97 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 97 transition count 141
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 225 place count 93 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 93 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 93 transition count 130
Applied a total of 231 rules in 12 ms. Remains 93 /195 variables (removed 102) and now considering 130/397 (removed 267) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 130 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 130 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 130 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 60 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/195 places, 130/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 93/195 places, 130/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 130 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3440423921648132402.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11294609835546798497.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3440423921648132402.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11294609835546798497.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,848480,4.47096,113832,2,14594,5,353377,6,0,502,335919,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(!((!(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1218>=1)))) * EX(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l1027>=1)))))) U !((EG(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l1027>=1)))) + EG(((s1>=1)&&(l608>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!((!(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l1218>=1)))) * EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l1027>=1)))))))) U !((EG(!(EX(!(...221
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t58, t59, t61, t72, t...483
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,20.2785,475572,1,0,547,2.03755e+06,300,293,3630,2.03994e+06,535
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 157 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 157 transition count 237
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 157 transition count 229
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 129 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 129 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 129 transition count 188
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 108 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 108 transition count 159
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 108 transition count 150
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 99 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 99 transition count 134
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 99 transition count 129
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 226 place count 93 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 93 transition count 122
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 236 place count 89 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 89 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 89 transition count 111
Applied a total of 242 rules in 8 ms. Remains 89 /195 variables (removed 106) and now considering 111/397 (removed 286) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 220 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 59 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/195 places, 111/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 89/195 places, 111/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3478488872375119696.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10415998137495162973.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3478488872375119696.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10415998137495162973.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,695798,2.59245,81760,2,13817,5,231075,6,0,467,282107,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((EG(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1215>=1)))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l607>=1))) U EG(((s1>=1)&&(l954>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),(EG(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l1215>=1)))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l607>=1)))),((s1>=1)&&(l954>=1)))] != FALS...156
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t47, t48, t49, t51, t57, t71, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, t...399
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 2/106/109
(forward)formula 0,0,18.9282,482868,1,0,507,2.11016e+06,264,280,3583,2.1652e+06,564
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 158 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 158 transition count 245
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 158 transition count 237
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 132 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 132 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 132 transition count 198
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 157 place count 115 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 115 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 115 transition count 166
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 190 place count 107 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 107 transition count 154
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 107 transition count 149
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 103 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 103 transition count 144
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 101 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 101 transition count 137
Applied a total of 215 rules in 7 ms. Remains 101 /195 variables (removed 94) and now considering 137/397 (removed 260) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 101 cols
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 101 cols
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 252 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 101 cols
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 74 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/195 places, 137/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 101/195 places, 137/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10029919938321630716.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:13:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17415744812575179708.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10029919938321630716.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17415744812575179708.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.95061e+06,9.88362,243012,2,18987,5,770576,6,0,541,737112,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(!(E(!((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l1284>=1))) * EG(((s1>=1)&&(l1224>=1))))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1235>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(!((!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1284>=1))))) * EG(((s1>=1)&&(l1224>=1))))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1235>=1))))))] =...161
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t53, t54, t56, t58, t60, t62, t76, t78, t79, t80, t...535
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 12:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 12:14:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 12:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8772072195237982759.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8772072195237982759.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8772072195237982759.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8772072195237982759.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8772072195237982759.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 12:14:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 12:14:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 12:14:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 139 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-06-09 12:14:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 94 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-06-09 12:14:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6699541031340029054.gal : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:14:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1949826305183980433.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6699541031340029054.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1949826305183980433.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.95061e+06,4.73177,121744,2104,686,105263,7399,416,971512,139,80755,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(!(E(!((AX(((i4.u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.u18.l1284>=1))) * EG(((i4.u0.s1>=1)&&(i1.u17.l1224>=1))))) U ((i4.u0.s1>=1)&&(i6.u16.l1235>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(!((!(EX(!(((i4.u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.u18.l1284>=1))))) * EG(((i4.u0.s1>=1)&&(i1.u17.l1224>=1))))) U ((...200
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t10, t11, t45, t47, t60, t76, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t86, t87, t89, t90, t93, t95, ...537
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,0,24.0579,511280,1,0,406552,38212,1813,4.44441e+06,753,363872,850285
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 160 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 160 transition count 252
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 160 transition count 245
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 134 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 134 transition count 214
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 134 transition count 207
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 117 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 117 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 117 transition count 174
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 186 place count 110 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 110 transition count 163
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 110 transition count 160
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 107 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 107 transition count 156
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 106 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 106 transition count 155
Applied a total of 204 rules in 13 ms. Remains 106 /195 variables (removed 89) and now considering 155/397 (removed 242) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 106 cols
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 106 cols
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 63 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 195 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 264 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 106 cols
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 74 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/195 places, 155/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 106/195 places, 155/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 155 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14663679531309474111.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:14:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16147161107228552750.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14663679531309474111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16147161107228552750.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50954e+06,15.8694,367232,2,28242,5,1.06912e+06,6,0,579,1.20157e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(EX(AF((((s1>=1)&&(l950>=1))&&(l1255>=1))))) U AG((!(((AG(((s1>=1)&&(l1284>=1))) + ((p59>=1)&&(l619>=1))) + (((((p37>=1)&&(l613>=1))|...229
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l1284>=1))))) + ((p59>=1)&&(l619>=1))) + (((((p37>=1)...702
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t29, t30, t34, t35, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t...668
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 12:15:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:15:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 12:15:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph561280454557563371.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph561280454557563371.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph561280454557563371.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph561280454557563371.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph561280454557563371.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 12:15:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 12:15:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 12:15:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 182 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:15:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-06-09 12:15:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 86 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2022-06-09 12:15:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14968321263504620768.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:15:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability415584741681470627.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14968321263504620768.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability415584741681470627.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50954e+06,8.97136,181184,3244,871,171548,14832,441,1.13798e+06,120,96939,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(EX(AF((((i1.u0.s1>=1)&&(i4.u16.l950>=1))&&(i6.u22.l1255>=1))))) U AG((!(((AG(((i1.u0.s1>=1)&&(i7.u26.l1284>=1))) + ((i3.u8.p59>=1)&&...328
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((i1.u0.s1>=1)&&(i7.u26.l1284>=1))))) + ((i3.u8.p59>=1)&&(i3.u12...959
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t11, t30, t34, t35, t57, t63, t70, t71, t74, t75, t80, t92, t104, t105, t107, t109, t110,...607
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 158 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 158 transition count 244
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 158 transition count 238
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 132 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 132 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 132 transition count 204
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 152 place count 113 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 113 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 113 transition count 169
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 105 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 105 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 105 transition count 154
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 98 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 98 transition count 146
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 93 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 93 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 93 transition count 133
Applied a total of 224 rules in 7 ms. Remains 93 /195 variables (removed 102) and now considering 133/397 (removed 264) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-09 12:15:50] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:15:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-09 12:15:50] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:15:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 52 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:15:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 220 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-09 12:15:51] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:15:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 71 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/195 places, 133/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 93/195 places, 133/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:15:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:15:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:15:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:15:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:15:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:15:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7696975211626989722.gal : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:15:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13465351477515428466.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7696975211626989722.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13465351477515428466.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,726277,2.41555,78344,2,10415,5,253240,6,0,505,179943,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(AF(EX((((s1>=1)&&(l1021>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1027>=1))))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1024>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!(EG(!(EX((((s1>=1)&&(l1021>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1027>=1))))))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1024>=1)))))] = FALS...156
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t...496
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,15.1688,376688,1,0,538,2.05558e+06,294,291,3518,1.41927e+06,559
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 161 transition count 261
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 161 transition count 261
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 161 transition count 249
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 138 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 138 transition count 222
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 138 transition count 216
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 122 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 122 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 122 transition count 188
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 178 place count 114 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 114 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 114 transition count 170
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 108 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 108 transition count 163
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 205 place count 104 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 104 transition count 154
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 104 transition count 152
Applied a total of 211 rules in 16 ms. Remains 104 /195 variables (removed 91) and now considering 152/397 (removed 245) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 152 rows 104 cols
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 152 rows 104 cols
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 56 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 221 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 152 rows 104 cols
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 74 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/195 places, 152/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 104/195 places, 152/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 152 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17263402941832478309.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:16:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8065175538948386578.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17263402941832478309.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8065175538948386578.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.89691e+06,10.7022,240364,2,23640,5,765073,6,0,568,724743,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AF((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1218>=1))) + EG(((p114>=1)&&(l506>=1))))) + ((EG((((s1>=1)&&(l1024>=1)) + EF(((p108>=1)&&(l0>=1))))) * (s1>=1)) *...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1218>=1))) + EG(((p114>=1)&&(l506>=1))))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(((EY(Init) ...394
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t...605
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 12:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-09 12:16:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 12:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7689074656134940661.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7689074656134940661.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7689074656134940661.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7689074656134940661.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7689074656134940661.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 12:16:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 12:16:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 12:16:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 147 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-09 12:16:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 116 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-06-09 12:16:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17437613010851032109.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:16:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13180348869119334107.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17437613010851032109.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13180348869119334107.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.89691e+06,4.84,124972,2444,2188,90855,49872,401,655152,164,653130,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AF((EX(((i4.u1.s1>=1)&&(i6.u17.l1218>=1))) + EG(((i4.u1.p114>=1)&&(i3.u18.l506>=1))))) + ((EG((((i4.u1.s1>=1)&&(i5.u15.l1024>=1)) + ...331
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((EX(((i4.u1.s1>=1)&&(i6.u17.l1218>=1))) + EG(((i4.u1.p114>=1)&&(i3.u18.l506>=1))))))))] !=...503
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t11, t13, t45, t52, t53, t64, t71, t75, t80, t82, t83, t84, t96, t112, t113, t114, t1...598
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 159 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 159 transition count 247
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 159 transition count 241
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 132 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 132 transition count 210
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 132 transition count 204
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 114 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 114 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 114 transition count 173
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 189 place count 106 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 106 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 106 transition count 156
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 101 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 101 transition count 150
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 211 place count 99 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 99 transition count 148
Applied a total of 213 rules in 17 ms. Remains 99 /195 variables (removed 96) and now considering 148/397 (removed 249) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 99 cols
[2022-06-09 12:17:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 99 cols
[2022-06-09 12:17:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 60 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:17:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 149 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 99 cols
[2022-06-09 12:17:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 86 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/195 places, 148/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 99/195 places, 148/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:17:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:17:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15004778580723026107.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17211821709746320413.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15004778580723026107.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17211821709746320413.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.57563e+06,9.6615,245304,2,21460,5,730484,6,0,544,839604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((EG(((s1<1)||(l1305<1))) + EX(EX(((s2>=1)&&(l1255>=1)))))) * (!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l951>=1)) U A(!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l612>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l121...306
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EX(EX(((s2>=1)&&(l1255>=1)))))) * !(EG(((s1<1)||(l1305<1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU((Init * !(!(E((...561
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t19, t20, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t...604
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 12:17:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 12:17:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph592612696376470625.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph592612696376470625.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph592612696376470625.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph592612696376470625.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph592612696376470625.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 12:17:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 12:17:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 12:17:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 124 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:17:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 90 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-06-09 12:17:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15377758950352196515.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15136283863100675693.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15377758950352196515.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15136283863100675693.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.57563e+06,2.22765,70376,1535,2791,75943,26736,279,168469,251,359268,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((EG(((u0.s1<1)||(u2.l1305<1))) + EX(EX(((u2.s2>=1)&&(u12.l1255>=1)))))) * (!(E(((u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.u9.l951>=1)) U A(!(E(((u0.s1>=1)&&(u0...375
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EX(EX(((u2.s2>=1)&&(u12.l1255>=1)))))) * !(EG(((u0.s1<1)||(u2.l1305<1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU((I...674
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t11, t40, t55, t56, t64, t66, t68, t69, t71, t80, t84, t98, t106, t114, t115, t116, t...632
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,0,15.0329,362640,1,0,421200,179997,1258,904960,1407,2.07005e+06,937475
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 156 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 156 transition count 231
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 156 transition count 226
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 127 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 127 transition count 190
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 127 transition count 184
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 106 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 106 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 106 transition count 146
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 96 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 96 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 96 transition count 125
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 89 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 89 transition count 117
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 239 place count 85 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 85 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 85 transition count 110
Applied a total of 246 rules in 31 ms. Remains 85 /195 variables (removed 110) and now considering 110/397 (removed 287) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 85 cols
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 85 cols
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 203 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 85 cols
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 61 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/195 places, 110/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 85/195 places, 110/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7053655271804257176.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:17:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15676046369517679021.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7053655271804257176.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15676046369517679021.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,475124,1.95269,59044,2,11426,5,180589,6,0,450,193903,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l304>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l304>=1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t41, t48, t54, t55, t56, t72, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t85, t86, t...378
(forward)formula 0,0,7.90678,171732,1,0,206,625641,246,83,3226,561642,243
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 397/397 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 158 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 158 transition count 244
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 158 transition count 238
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 132 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 132 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 132 transition count 201
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 115 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 115 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 115 transition count 170
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 108 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 108 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 108 transition count 158
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 198 place count 104 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 104 transition count 153
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 102 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 102 transition count 146
Applied a total of 206 rules in 17 ms. Remains 102 /195 variables (removed 93) and now considering 146/397 (removed 251) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 102 cols
[2022-06-09 12:18:00] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:18:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 102 cols
[2022-06-09 12:18:00] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:18:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 55 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:18:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 165 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 240 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 102 cols
[2022-06-09 12:18:01] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:18:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 75 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/195 places, 146/397 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 102/195 places, 146/397 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:18:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:18:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:18:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 146 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:18:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:18:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:18:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15968545267965832994.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:18:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13336769708607781499.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15968545267965832994.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13336769708607781499.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.15324e+06,9.72075,253444,2,19069,5,765057,6,0,554,719302,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EF((((s1>=1)&&(l1289>=1))&&(((s1>=1)&&(l944>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1022>=1))))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l1226>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (((s1>=1)&&(l1289>=1))&&(((s1>=1)&&(l944>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1022>=1)))))] != FALSE + [(E...198
(forward)formula 0,1,16.1096,255940,1,0,9,766440,9,1,1133,721365,4
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2022-06-09 12:18:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-06-09 12:18:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-09 12:18:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 12:18:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9352064683106858679.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9352064683106858679.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9352064683106858679.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9352064683106858679.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9352064683106858679.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 12:18:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 12:18:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 12:18:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 323 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:18:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2022-06-09 12:18:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 256 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2022-06-09 12:18:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9075908183672820262.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:18:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7704563293404573647.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9075908183672820262.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7704563293404573647.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 12:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-09 12:41:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4746622181747922188.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:41:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11639699600240982589.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4746622181747922188.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11639699600240982589.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.7666e+07,237.93,4561056,2,107641,5,1.14635e+07,6,0,1177,5.61014e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(!(A(EF((((s1>=1)&&(l1219>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1221>=1)))) U ((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l970>=1))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l448>=1)))) * A(((s1>=1)&&(l318>=1...349
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY((Init * !((E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l445>=1))) * EX((!(E((((s1>=1)&&(l1022>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1232>=1))) U (((s1...834
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t20, t21, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t39, t40, t41,...1692
(forward)formula 0,1,614.212,5519600,1,0,770,3.14125e+07,13,271,3857,1.21209e+07,6
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(EX(EX(AF((((s1>=1)&&(l950>=1))&&(l1255>=1))))) U AG((!(((AG(((s1>=1)&&(l1284>=1))) + ((p59>=1)&&(l619>=1))) + (((((p37>=1)&&(l613>=1))|...229
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l1284>=1))))) + ((p59>=1)&&(l619>=1))) + (((((p37>=1)...702
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 1,0,807.898,6192388,1,0,770,3.59205e+07,11,271,3821,1.47855e+07,31
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EX(((AF((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1218>=1))) + EG(((p114>=1)&&(l506>=1))))) + ((EG((((s1>=1)&&(l1024>=1)) + EF(((p108>=1)&&(l0>=1))))) * (s1>=1)) *...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1218>=1))) + EG(((p114>=1)&&(l506>=1))))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(((EY(Init) ...394
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 2,0,948.227,6229540,1,0,770,3.6289e+07,42,271,4321,1.48383e+07,283
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 2814138 ms.

BK_STOP 1654779414128

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281900202"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;