Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r312-tall-165472281900194.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281900194
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 768K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K Jun 7 17:11 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K Jun 7 17:11 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Jun 7 17:11 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K Jun 7 17:11 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Jun 6 15:24 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Jun 6 15:24 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Jun 6 15:24 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Jun 6 15:24 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 6 12:11 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K Jun 7 17:12 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K Jun 7 17:12 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K Jun 7 17:12 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K Jun 7 17:12 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Jun 6 15:24 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:24 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 432K Jun 6 12:11 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1654776383358

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-06-09 12:06:24] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-06-09 12:06:24] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-06-09 12:06:25] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 125 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:25] [INFO ] Transformed 1440 places.
[2022-06-09 12:06:25] [INFO ] Transformed 672 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:06:25] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1440 places and 672 transitions in 229 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1093 places in 13 ms
Reduce places removed 1093 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 85 out of 347 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 347/347 places, 672/672 transitions.
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 80 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 80 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 101 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 326 transition count 592
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 269 transition count 517
Iterating global reduction 1 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 269 transition count 517
Ensure Unique test removed 27 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 27 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 269 transition count 490
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 277 place count 234 transition count 455
Iterating global reduction 2 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 234 transition count 455
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 325 place count 221 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 221 transition count 438
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 221 transition count 423
Applied a total of 353 rules in 64 ms. Remains 221 /347 variables (removed 126) and now considering 423/672 (removed 249) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 423 rows 221 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 16 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 239 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 423 rows 221 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 232 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:06:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 546 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 812 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 423 rows 221 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:26] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:26] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 150 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 221/347 places, 423/672 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 221/347 places, 423/672 transitions.
Support contains 85 out of 221 places after structural reductions.
[2022-06-09 12:06:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 423 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 221 places (down from 85) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2304 resets, run finished after 536 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 ) properties (out of 68) seen :9
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 34 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 60 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 99 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 62 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 115 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 19 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 36 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 62 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 99 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 112 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 36 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 94 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 59) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 59 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 423 rows 221 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:27] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 12:06:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 12:06:28] [INFO ] After 499ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :4 sat :0 real:55
[2022-06-09 12:06:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 12:06:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 12:06:31] [INFO ] After 2330ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :8 sat :51
[2022-06-09 12:06:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 232 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:06:35] [INFO ] After 3929ms SMT Verify possible using 232 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :8 sat :51
[2022-06-09 12:06:38] [INFO ] After 7845ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :8 sat :51
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 4119 ms.
[2022-06-09 12:06:43] [INFO ] After 14774ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :8 sat :51
Fused 59 Parikh solutions to 51 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 462 ms.
Support contains 61 out of 221 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 210 transition count 395
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 210 transition count 395
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 210 transition count 393
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 203 transition count 385
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 203 transition count 385
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 203 transition count 383
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 200 transition count 378
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 200 transition count 378
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 200 transition count 374
Applied a total of 50 rules in 57 ms. Remains 200 /221 variables (removed 21) and now considering 374/423 (removed 49) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 200/221 places, 374/423 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2265 resets, run finished after 306 ms. (steps per millisecond=32 ) properties (out of 51) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 102 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 108 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 105 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 122 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 101 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 102 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 85 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=32 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 101 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 86 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 99 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 378802 steps, run visited all 50 properties in 1404 ms. (steps per millisecond=269 )
Probabilistic random walk after 378802 steps, saw 144003 distinct states, run finished after 1404 ms. (steps per millisecond=269 ) properties seen :50
Successfully simplified 8 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-06-09 12:06:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 423 transitions.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 175 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 175 transition count 268
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 175 transition count 264
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 139 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 139 transition count 223
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 139 transition count 211
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 118 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 118 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 118 transition count 169
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 242 place count 108 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 108 transition count 150
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 108 transition count 147
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 261 place count 102 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 102 transition count 141
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 273 place count 96 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 96 transition count 135
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 96 transition count 132
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 283 place count 95 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 95 transition count 126
Applied a total of 284 rules in 36 ms. Remains 95 /221 variables (removed 126) and now considering 126/423 (removed 297) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 95 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 95 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 209 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 95 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 55 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/221 places, 126/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 95/221 places, 126/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability269770908673142964.gal : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1261243594865642174.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability269770908673142964.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1261243594865642174.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,98375,0.85366,36156,2,8368,5,106608,6,0,506,104161,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((!(A(((s1>=1)&&(l609>=1)) U (EG(((s4>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + E(((s1>=1)&&(l465>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l610>=1)))))) * ((s1<1)||(l1308<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(!((E(!((EG(((s4>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + E(((s1>=1)&&(l465>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l610>=1))))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(...366
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t33, t37, t45, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t61, t71, t...484
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,8.21949,254888,1,0,515,1.20182e+06,292,281,3537,1.06202e+06,506
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 173 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 173 transition count 258
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 173 transition count 255
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 135 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 135 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 135 transition count 201
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 113 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 113 transition count 164
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 113 transition count 155
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 102 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 102 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 102 transition count 134
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 94 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 94 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 94 transition count 124
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 288 place count 87 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 87 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 87 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 300 place count 85 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 85 transition count 106
Applied a total of 302 rules in 30 ms. Remains 85 /221 variables (removed 136) and now considering 106/423 (removed 317) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 85 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 85 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 85 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 48 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/221 places, 106/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 85/221 places, 106/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10975626836950183639.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12200482488151600123.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10975626836950183639.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12200482488151600123.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61759,0.383367,20360,2,4922,5,54041,6,0,446,44409,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((s1<1)||(l1023<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((s1<1)||(l1023<1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 3/0/103
(forward)formula 0,1,2.13516,77604,1,0,20,269176,19,4,2330,199016,16
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 177 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 177 transition count 274
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 177 transition count 270
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 141 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 141 transition count 229
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 141 transition count 219
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 121 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 121 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 121 transition count 176
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 112 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 112 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 112 transition count 159
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 105 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 105 transition count 152
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 105 transition count 150
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 265 place count 99 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 99 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 99 transition count 141
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 275 place count 98 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 98 transition count 135
Applied a total of 276 rules in 17 ms. Remains 98 /221 variables (removed 123) and now considering 135/423 (removed 288) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 98 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 98 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 52 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 161 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 98 cols
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 63 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/221 places, 135/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 98/221 places, 135/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9213698169785655052.gal : 9 ms
[2022-06-09 12:06:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15843091739109926981.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9213698169785655052.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15843091739109926981.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92245,0.870797,37660,2,8980,5,108796,6,0,527,93282,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(EG(((p103<1)||(l0<1)))) + ((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1019>=1))) * EF(((s1>=1)&&(l606>=1)))) * ((s1<1)||(l459<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1019>=1))) * E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l606>=1)))) * ((s1<1)||(l459<1))))) * !...199
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t29, t30, t37, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t57, t59, t60, t61, t...503
(forward)formula 0,1,6.17781,189388,1,0,329,913730,297,134,3655,610132,387
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 178 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 178 transition count 287
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 178 transition count 283
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 145 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 145 transition count 245
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 145 transition count 236
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 128 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 128 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 128 transition count 197
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 120 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 120 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 120 transition count 184
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 114 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 114 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 114 transition count 176
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 109 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 109 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 109 transition count 168
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 253 place count 108 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 108 transition count 166
Applied a total of 254 rules in 18 ms. Remains 108 /221 variables (removed 113) and now considering 166/423 (removed 257) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 108 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 108 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 74 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:07:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 175 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 108 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:04] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 69 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/221 places, 166/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/221 places, 166/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 166 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1113758556531254628.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3389978073557672238.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1113758556531254628.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3389978073557672238.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,177341,1.76445,68308,2,11014,5,187775,6,0,598,173442,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(((AG(AF(((p45>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l610>=1))) + (AG(((s1>=1)&&(l1232>=1))) * (((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1029>=1))) + (s1<1)) + ((l10...215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(EY(Init)) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((p45>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(EY(Init)) * ((s1>=1)&&(l610>=...556
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t29, t30, t31, t34, t35, t36, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t...693
(forward)formula 0,0,8.73768,264096,1,0,413,1.26495e+06,367,153,4221,782894,463
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 179 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 179 transition count 276
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 179 transition count 273
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 145 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 145 transition count 237
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 145 transition count 229
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 181 place count 127 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 127 transition count 198
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 127 transition count 189
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 119 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 119 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 119 transition count 175
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 113 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 113 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 113 transition count 167
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 108 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 108 transition count 162
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 108 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 253 place count 107 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 107 transition count 157
Applied a total of 254 rules in 11 ms. Remains 107 /221 variables (removed 114) and now considering 157/423 (removed 266) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 107 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 107 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 60 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:07:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 214 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 107 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:13] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:13] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 75 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/221 places, 157/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 107/221 places, 157/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 157 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11958803056757768609.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7279428757240393877.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11958803056757768609.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7279428757240393877.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,173207,1.85308,66264,2,11867,5,196600,6,0,585,175498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(E(((((p26>=1)&&(l0>=1)) + AF(((s0>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + AG(((p63>=1)&&(l613>=1)))) U (!(((!((s1>=1)&&(l1022>=1)))||(((s1>=1)&&(l36>=1))&...238
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(((((p26>=1)&&(l0>=1)) + !(EG(!(((s0>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) + !(E(TRUE U !(((p63>=1)&&(l613>=1)))))) ...301
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t30, t31, t35, t36, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t51, t52,...648
(forward)formula 0,1,10.1002,295812,1,0,443,1.42312e+06,355,176,4182,909431,507
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 180 transition count 293
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 180 transition count 293
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 180 transition count 287
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 149 transition count 251
Iterating global reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 149 transition count 251
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 149 transition count 244
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 131 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 131 transition count 213
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 131 transition count 206
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 122 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 122 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 122 transition count 188
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 227 place count 118 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 118 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 118 transition count 182
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 236 place count 115 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 115 transition count 179
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 241 place count 113 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 113 transition count 171
Applied a total of 243 rules in 26 ms. Remains 113 /221 variables (removed 108) and now considering 171/423 (removed 252) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 171 rows 113 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 171 rows 113 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 70 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 194 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 251 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 9 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 171 rows 113 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 78 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/221 places, 171/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 113/221 places, 171/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 171 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15202267890771716933.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8477094923282204545.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15202267890771716933.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8477094923282204545.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,225401,3.51134,116888,2,10972,5,348188,6,0,623,207966,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((EG(E(((s1>=1)&&(l1218>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1028>=1)))) * (s1>=1)) * (l1022>=1)) U A(AF(E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l35>=1))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1224>=1))...322
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,((EG(E(((s1>=1)&&(l1218>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1028>=1)))) * (s1>=1)) * (l1022>=1))) * !(EG(!(((E(((s1>...798
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t48, t52, t53, t58, t60, t62, t74, t75, t76, t77, t...632
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,17.8951,470936,1,0,731,2.5639e+06,405,373,4456,1.59704e+06,831
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 177 transition count 270
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 177 transition count 270
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 177 transition count 268
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 142 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 142 transition count 228
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 142 transition count 219
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 191 place count 120 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 120 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 120 transition count 172
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 109 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 109 transition count 153
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 109 transition count 151
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 254 place count 101 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 101 transition count 143
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 101 transition count 141
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 94 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 94 transition count 134
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 94 transition count 131
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 282 place count 93 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 93 transition count 129
Applied a total of 283 rules in 14 ms. Remains 93 /221 variables (removed 128) and now considering 129/423 (removed 294) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:41] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:41] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 52 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:07:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 198 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:42] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 63 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/221 places, 129/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 93/221 places, 129/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 129 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17261751108596224935.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16178761786899270858.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17261751108596224935.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16178761786899270858.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,86804,0.943795,39152,2,7310,5,118372,6,0,501,107614,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AF((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l311>=1))) * EG(((p27>=1)&&(l0>=1))))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l1024>=1))&&((s1<1)||(l1025<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((EY(Init) * !((((s1>=1)&&(l1024>=1))&&((s1<1)||(l1025<1))))),!((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l311>=1))) * EG(((p27>=1)&&(...175
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t41, t47, t55, t56, t57, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t76, t77, t78, t79, t...467
(forward)formula 0,0,3.27214,97452,1,0,237,347310,285,95,3535,260377,283
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 174 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 174 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 174 transition count 256
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 137 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 137 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 137 transition count 205
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 114 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 114 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 114 transition count 157
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 248 place count 102 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 102 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 102 transition count 133
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 94 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 94 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 94 transition count 123
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 288 place count 87 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 87 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 87 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 299 place count 86 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 86 transition count 111
Applied a total of 300 rules in 17 ms. Remains 86 /221 variables (removed 135) and now considering 111/423 (removed 312) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 86 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 86 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 86 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 47 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/221 places, 111/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 86/221 places, 111/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5179192121542677820.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11281476850461869274.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5179192121542677820.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11281476850461869274.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,64527,0.529983,25964,2,6036,5,68226,6,0,455,64105,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AG(((p33>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U !(((p33>=1)&&(l0>=1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t41, t47, t54, t55, t56, t72, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t85, t86, t...384
(forward)formula 0,0,1.82346,66896,1,0,209,240579,250,82,3130,144206,245
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 175 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 175 transition count 264
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 175 transition count 261
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 140 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 140 transition count 221
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 140 transition count 213
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 193 place count 120 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 120 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 120 transition count 171
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 111 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 111 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 111 transition count 154
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 247 place count 105 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 105 transition count 148
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 105 transition count 146
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 260 place count 100 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 100 transition count 141
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 100 transition count 140
Applied a total of 266 rules in 9 ms. Remains 100 /221 variables (removed 121) and now considering 140/423 (removed 283) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 53 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 168 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 219 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 61 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/221 places, 140/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 100/221 places, 140/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 140 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3599945493006785167.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5325034643006477008.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3599945493006785167.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5325034643006477008.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,110812,0.802966,35724,2,8112,5,93112,6,0,540,90668,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((!(A(((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l1026>=1))) + EG(((p12>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + AF(((s1>=1)&&(l1022>=1)))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l949>=1)))) * ((p57<1)||(l621<1)...158
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l949>=1))) U (!(((!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1026>=1))))) + EG(((p12>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + !...282
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t34, t35, t45, t46, t47, t49, t50, t51, t52, t58, t59, t60, t62, t67, t...521
(forward)formula 0,1,8.47156,255540,1,0,619,1.05448e+06,321,316,3744,1.03744e+06,654
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 174 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 174 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 174 transition count 256
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 136 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 136 transition count 213
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 136 transition count 202
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 113 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 113 transition count 163
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 113 transition count 154
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 251 place count 101 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 101 transition count 133
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 101 transition count 130
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 274 place count 93 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 93 transition count 122
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 93 transition count 120
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 291 place count 86 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 86 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 86 transition count 111
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 302 place count 84 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 84 transition count 103
Applied a total of 304 rules in 24 ms. Remains 84 /221 variables (removed 137) and now considering 103/423 (removed 320) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 84 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 84 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 84 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 51 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/221 places, 103/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 84/221 places, 103/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1589927828633017262.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17597586440558955651.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1589927828633017262.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17597586440558955651.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61205,0.356811,18808,2,5462,5,50040,6,0,439,41888,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p92<1)||(l0<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p92<1)||(l0<1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 70/0/33
(forward)formula 0,1,1.50882,53532,1,0,18,197516,19,4,2354,127072,16
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 177 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 177 transition count 278
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 177 transition count 273
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 143 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 143 transition count 234
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 143 transition count 224
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 190 place count 124 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 124 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 124 transition count 184
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 226 place count 114 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 114 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 114 transition count 165
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 245 place count 109 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 109 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 109 transition count 158
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 256 place count 105 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 105 transition count 154
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 262 place count 103 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 103 transition count 146
Applied a total of 264 rules in 17 ms. Remains 103 /221 variables (removed 118) and now considering 146/423 (removed 277) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 103 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 103 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 56 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 155 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 103 cols
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 63 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 103/221 places, 146/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/221 places, 146/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 146 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11376278231451488363.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:07:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2342059391486771513.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11376278231451488363.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2342059391486771513.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,170501,1.57011,60232,2,9248,5,180392,6,0,558,142175,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((A(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1217>=1))) U ((!(EG(((s1>=1)&&(l1025>=1)))) * (s1>=1)) * (l1224>=1))) * AF(((s1<1)||(l400<1)))) * ((s1<1)||(l1229<1...159
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((((([FwdG((FwdU(EY(Init),!(((!(EG(((s1>=1)&&(l1025>=1)))) * (s1>=1)) * (l1224>=1)))) * !(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l1...669
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t52, t53, t55, t57, t59, t61, t63, t73, t74, t75, t...563
(forward)formula 0,0,7.06086,197332,1,0,481,735027,329,250,3891,750551,473
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 173 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 173 transition count 258
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 173 transition count 255
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 135 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 135 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 135 transition count 201
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 113 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 113 transition count 164
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 113 transition count 155
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 102 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 102 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 102 transition count 134
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 94 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 94 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 94 transition count 124
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 288 place count 87 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 87 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 87 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 300 place count 85 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 85 transition count 106
Applied a total of 302 rules in 31 ms. Remains 85 /221 variables (removed 136) and now considering 106/423 (removed 317) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 85 cols
[2022-06-09 12:08:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 85 cols
[2022-06-09 12:08:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:08:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 197 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:08:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 85 cols
[2022-06-09 12:08:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 63 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/221 places, 106/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 85/221 places, 106/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2270 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=555 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 486 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=1250 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 4375 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=486 )
Probabilistic random walk after 4375 steps, saw 2011 distinct states, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=486 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 180 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 180 transition count 296
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 180 transition count 290
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 147 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 147 transition count 252
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 147 transition count 236
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 186 place count 131 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 131 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 131 transition count 199
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 217 place count 123 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 123 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 123 transition count 185
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 117 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 117 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 117 transition count 177
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 247 place count 112 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 112 transition count 172
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 112 transition count 170
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 111 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 111 transition count 168
Applied a total of 256 rules in 30 ms. Remains 111 /221 variables (removed 110) and now considering 168/423 (removed 255) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 111 cols
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 111 cols
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 77 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 232 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 111 cols
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 66 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/221 places, 168/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 111/221 places, 168/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17841014907168998051.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8221416803474769049.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17841014907168998051.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8221416803474769049.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,170274,2.92296,93076,2,14498,5,257472,6,0,612,235769,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((E((((s1>=1)&&(l1217>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1029>=1))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l610>=1))) * (s1>=1)) * (l608>=1))) + AG((((EG(((s1<1)||(l1284<1))) +...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((E((((s1>=1)&&(l1217>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1029>=1))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l610>=1))) * (s1>=1...298
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t28, t30, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t...693
(forward)formula 0,1,15.2541,405792,1,0,423,1.8157e+06,375,169,4370,1.23673e+06,472
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 179 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 179 transition count 280
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 179 transition count 276
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 147 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 147 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 147 transition count 231
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 130 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 130 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 130 transition count 197
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 124 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 124 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 124 transition count 187
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 121 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 121 transition count 184
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 224 place count 118 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 118 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 118 transition count 180
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 117 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 117 transition count 178
Applied a total of 230 rules in 18 ms. Remains 117 /221 variables (removed 104) and now considering 178/423 (removed 245) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 117 cols
[2022-06-09 12:08:21] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 117 cols
[2022-06-09 12:08:21] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 70 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:08:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 243 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 117 cols
[2022-06-09 12:08:22] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:22] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 68 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/221 places, 178/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 117/221 places, 178/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:08:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 178 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:08:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10643557007356948909.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2410556640402642337.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10643557007356948909.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2410556640402642337.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,276328,3.34465,108236,2,12826,5,306071,6,0,646,266521,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(!(E(((p125>=1)&&(l431>=1)) U AF(((s1>=1)&&(l1289>=1)))))) * E(AX(AF((((s1>=1)&&(l1237>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l1027>=1))))) U EF(((A(((s1>=1...248
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(Init),((p125>=1)&&(l431>=1))) * !(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1289>=1))))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(!(EX(!(!(EG(...409
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t29, t30, t34, t35, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50,...757
(forward)formula 0,0,15.8557,419436,1,0,600,2.16482e+06,399,246,4675,1.44623e+06,685
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 423/423 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 175 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 175 transition count 265
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 175 transition count 263
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 138 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 138 transition count 221
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 138 transition count 210
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 116 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 116 transition count 172
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 116 transition count 163
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 242 place count 106 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 106 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 106 transition count 143
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 262 place count 99 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 99 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 99 transition count 134
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 277 place count 93 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 93 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 93 transition count 126
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 287 place count 91 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 91 transition count 118
Applied a total of 289 rules in 22 ms. Remains 91 /221 variables (removed 130) and now considering 118/423 (removed 305) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 91 cols
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 91 cols
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 182 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 91 cols
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 56 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/221 places, 118/423 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 91/221 places, 118/423 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4280419340801984427.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11580292086532834649.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4280419340801984427.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11580292086532834649.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,81681,0.649931,30948,2,6510,5,92190,6,0,482,75431,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((EF(((((s1>=1)&&(l1020>=1))||(s1<1))||(l1215<1))) * ((s1<1)||(l1254<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U ((((s1>=1)&&(l1020>=1))||(s1<1))||(l1215<1))) * ((s1<1)||(l1254<1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t49, t55, t74, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t...411
(forward)formula 0,1,2.75291,89620,1,0,226,318726,262,93,3398,231525,262
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2022-06-09 12:08:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2022-06-09 12:08:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Total runtime 136462 ms.

BK_STOP 1654776521380

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281900194"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m05 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;