Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r312-tall-165472281900186.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281900186
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 920K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K Jun 7 17:11 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 83K Jun 7 17:11 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K Jun 7 17:11 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K Jun 7 17:11 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Jun 6 15:24 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Jun 6 15:24 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Jun 6 15:24 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Jun 6 15:24 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 6 12:11 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Jun 7 17:12 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 176K Jun 7 17:12 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K Jun 7 17:11 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K Jun 7 17:11 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Jun 6 15:24 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:24 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 432K Jun 6 12:11 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1654776212784

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-06-09 12:03:33] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-06-09 12:03:33] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-06-09 12:03:34] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 134 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:34] [INFO ] Transformed 1440 places.
[2022-06-09 12:03:34] [INFO ] Transformed 672 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:03:34] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1440 places and 672 transitions in 241 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1093 places in 7 ms
Reduce places removed 1093 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 85 out of 347 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 347/347 places, 672/672 transitions.
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 80 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 80 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 101 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 326 transition count 592
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 269 transition count 503
Iterating global reduction 1 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 269 transition count 503
Ensure Unique test removed 21 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 21 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 269 transition count 482
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 273 place count 232 transition count 445
Iterating global reduction 2 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 310 place count 232 transition count 445
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 319 place count 223 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 223 transition count 436
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 223 transition count 425
Applied a total of 339 rules in 71 ms. Remains 223 /347 variables (removed 124) and now considering 425/672 (removed 247) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 425 rows 223 cols
[2022-06-09 12:03:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 16 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 248 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 425 rows 223 cols
[2022-06-09 12:03:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 228 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:03:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 568 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 845 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 425 rows 223 cols
[2022-06-09 12:03:35] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:35] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 173 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 223/347 places, 425/672 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 223/347 places, 425/672 transitions.
Support contains 85 out of 223 places after structural reductions.
[2022-06-09 12:03:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 425 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 223 places (down from 85) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2305 resets, run finished after 680 ms. (steps per millisecond=14 ) properties (out of 65) seen :9
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 36 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 56) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 55) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 54) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 86 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 54) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 81 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 99 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 53) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 90 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 91 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 92 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 61 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 52 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 425 rows 223 cols
[2022-06-09 12:03:37] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 12:03:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 12:03:37] [INFO ] After 419ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:52
[2022-06-09 12:03:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 12:03:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 12:03:40] [INFO ] After 2340ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :48
[2022-06-09 12:03:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 228 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:03:44] [INFO ] After 4298ms SMT Verify possible using 228 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :48
[2022-06-09 12:03:49] [INFO ] After 8575ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :48
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 4122 ms.
[2022-06-09 12:03:53] [INFO ] After 15491ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :48
Fused 52 Parikh solutions to 48 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 650 ms.
Support contains 58 out of 223 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 213 transition count 407
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 213 transition count 407
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 213 transition count 403
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 209 transition count 399
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 209 transition count 399
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 207 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 207 transition count 397
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 207 transition count 396
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 206 transition count 394
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 206 transition count 394
Applied a total of 39 rules in 75 ms. Remains 206 /223 variables (removed 17) and now considering 394/425 (removed 31) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 206/223 places, 394/425 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2291 resets, run finished after 337 ms. (steps per millisecond=29 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 34 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 34 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 93 resets, run finished after 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=32 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 86 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 90 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 110 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 107 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 112 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 63 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 107 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Probably explored full state space saw : 64627 states, properties seen :43
Probabilistic random walk after 168691 steps, saw 64627 distinct states, run finished after 1591 ms. (steps per millisecond=106 ) properties seen :43
Explored full state space saw : 64832 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 168957 steps, saw 64832 distinct states, run finished after 1547 ms. (steps per millisecond=109 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 9 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-06-09 12:03:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 425 transitions.
Support contains 67 out of 223 places (down from 71) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 174 transition count 266
Iterating global reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 174 transition count 266
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 174 transition count 262
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 138 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 138 transition count 220
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 138 transition count 210
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 116 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 116 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 116 transition count 166
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 248 place count 106 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 106 transition count 150
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 106 transition count 148
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 265 place count 101 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 101 transition count 143
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 101 transition count 142
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 274 place count 98 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 98 transition count 139
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 98 transition count 138
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 279 place count 97 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 97 transition count 136
Applied a total of 280 rules in 15 ms. Remains 97 /223 variables (removed 126) and now considering 136/425 (removed 289) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 97 cols
[2022-06-09 12:03:57] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 97 cols
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 47 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 233 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 97 cols
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 62 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/223 places, 136/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 97/223 places, 136/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17760001415696968010.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18225922011656018653.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17760001415696968010.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18225922011656018653.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16081,0.419403,20844,2,4498,5,53982,6,0,524,43799,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF((((s1>=1)&&(l321>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l962>=1)))) * AG(A(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1235>=1))) U ((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l949>=1))) * (s1>=1)) * (l1307>=1...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((s1>=1)&&(l321>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l962>=1)))))] = FALSE * ((([((FwdU(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRU...712
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t19, t20, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t...549
(forward)formula 0,0,1.43747,47460,1,0,276,156396,294,101,3758,95084,294
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 173 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 173 transition count 264
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 173 transition count 258
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 143 place count 136 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 136 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 136 transition count 202
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 112 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 112 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 112 transition count 158
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 259 place count 100 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 100 transition count 137
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 100 transition count 131
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 282 place count 95 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 95 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 95 transition count 125
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 292 place count 91 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 91 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 297 place count 90 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 90 transition count 114
Applied a total of 298 rules in 21 ms. Remains 90 /223 variables (removed 133) and now considering 114/425 (removed 311) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 90 cols
[2022-06-09 12:03:59] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 90 cols
[2022-06-09 12:03:59] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:03:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 194 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 90 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:00] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:00] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 60 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/223 places, 114/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 90/223 places, 114/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3565812013578121918.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15313762595696294890.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3565812013578121918.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15313762595696294890.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,12447,0.236531,14880,2,3389,5,31750,6,0,474,28604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(A(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1224>=1))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l941>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l941>=1))) U (!(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l1224>=1)))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l941>=1)))...203
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t51, t54, t56, t73, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t85, t...407
(forward)formula 0,0,2.61742,86968,1,0,489,384741,261,248,3365,310248,518
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 182 transition count 281
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 182 transition count 281
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 182 transition count 276
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 151 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 151 transition count 241
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 151 transition count 233
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 173 place count 135 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 135 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 135 transition count 206
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 202 place count 128 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 128 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 128 transition count 192
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 125 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 125 transition count 189
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 220 place count 122 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 122 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 122 transition count 185
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 225 place count 121 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 121 transition count 183
Applied a total of 226 rules in 12 ms. Remains 121 /223 variables (removed 102) and now considering 183/425 (removed 242) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 121 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 121 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 219 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 279 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 121 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:03] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 76 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/223 places, 183/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 121/223 places, 183/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17270322939551507393.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13908419611035487903.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17270322939551507393.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13908419611035487903.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,26309,0.898152,37460,2,7354,5,92352,6,0,667,75428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((EF(((p13>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + ((EF(EG(((p125>=1)&&(l431>=1)))) * (A(((p99>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1222>=1))) + E(((s1>=1)&&(l1306>=1...359
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * ((p13>=1)&&(l0>=1)))] != FALSE + ([((EY(Init) * (E(TRUE U EG(((p125>=1)&&(l431>=1)))) ...782
(forward)formula 0,1,1.50797,39160,1,0,9,92609,9,1,1315,75428,4
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 173 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 173 transition count 264
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 173 transition count 259
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 136 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 136 transition count 213
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 136 transition count 203
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 112 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 112 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 112 transition count 157
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 101 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 101 transition count 140
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 101 transition count 136
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 279 place count 95 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 95 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 95 transition count 129
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 291 place count 90 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 90 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 90 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 300 place count 89 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 89 transition count 114
Applied a total of 301 rules in 28 ms. Remains 89 /223 variables (removed 134) and now considering 114/425 (removed 311) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:04] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:04] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 364 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 435 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:04:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 82 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/223 places, 114/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 89/223 places, 114/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14844015144860253023.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8552914604150318333.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14844015144860253023.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8552914604150318333.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11480,0.265107,15112,2,3315,5,36205,6,0,470,28787,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AG(((s1<1)||(l1229<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((s1<1)||(l1229<1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t64, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t74, t75, t76, t78, t...442
(forward)formula 0,1,1.68312,55100,1,0,278,213200,254,116,3299,138593,315
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 180 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 180 transition count 304
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 180 transition count 294
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 148 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 148 transition count 254
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 148 transition count 245
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 189 place count 128 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 128 transition count 217
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 128 transition count 205
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 227 place count 122 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 122 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 122 transition count 190
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 240 place count 119 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 119 transition count 187
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 245 place count 117 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 117 transition count 185
Applied a total of 247 rules in 8 ms. Remains 117 /223 variables (removed 106) and now considering 185/425 (removed 240) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 185 rows 117 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 185 rows 117 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 83 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 399 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 495 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 185 rows 117 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 12 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 123 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/223 places, 185/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 117/223 places, 185/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 185 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2153081481981556338.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17581955678204298754.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2153081481981556338.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17581955678204298754.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,21070,1.15916,43224,2,6548,5,105271,6,0,653,78474,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((p33>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + !(E((((EG(((((s1>=1)&&(l1024>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l948>=1)))||((p114>=1)&&(l506>=1)))) * A(((s1>=1)&&(l1221>=1)) U...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(EX(((p33>=1)&&(l0>=1))))),(((EG(((((s1>=1)&&(l1024>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l948>=1)))||((p114>=1)...455
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t21, t34, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t...756
(forward)formula 0,0,5.95931,175340,1,0,457,749879,411,179,4704,436828,525
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 175 transition count 270
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 175 transition count 270
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 175 transition count 264
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 140 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 140 transition count 220
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 140 transition count 210
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 119 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 119 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 119 transition count 171
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 242 place count 109 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 109 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 109 transition count 149
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 262 place count 105 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 105 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 105 transition count 144
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 103 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 103 transition count 142
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 272 place count 102 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 102 transition count 140
Applied a total of 273 rules in 9 ms. Remains 102 /223 variables (removed 121) and now considering 140/425 (removed 285) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 102 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:13] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 102 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:13] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 51 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 239 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 102 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 70 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/223 places, 140/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 102/223 places, 140/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 140 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15143805854213974475.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4572923051219525814.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15143805854213974475.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4572923051219525814.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17541,0.528947,25664,2,5628,5,66562,6,0,548,61161,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l1216>=1)) U !(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1226>=1)))))) + (AX(AG(((s1<1)||(l454<1)))) * EF(AX(((p87>=1)&&(l405>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY((Init * !(!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l1216>=1)) U !(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l1226>=1))))))))),TRUE) * !(((s1<1)||(l45...310
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t27, t32, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t53, t...583
(forward)formula 0,1,2.50867,85660,1,0,363,329520,309,148,3776,201866,393
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 172 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 172 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 172 transition count 254
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 134 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 134 transition count 207
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 134 transition count 197
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 109 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 109 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 109 transition count 150
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 265 place count 97 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 97 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 97 transition count 125
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 288 place count 90 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 90 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 90 transition count 117
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 302 place count 84 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 84 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 311 place count 84 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 312 place count 83 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 83 transition count 101
Applied a total of 313 rules in 20 ms. Remains 83 /223 variables (removed 140) and now considering 101/425 (removed 324) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 83 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 83 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 182 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 83 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 46 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/223 places, 101/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 83/223 places, 101/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15875044706049959050.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7000689107432851366.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15875044706049959050.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7000689107432851366.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8831,0.148824,11780,2,2790,5,24923,6,0,433,19119,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(TRUE))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t63, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t76, t77, t78, t...364
(forward)formula 0,0,0.875207,39732,1,0,204,136535,226,84,3097,93307,230
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 173 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 173 transition count 264
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 173 transition count 259
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 136 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 136 transition count 213
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 136 transition count 203
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 112 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 112 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 112 transition count 157
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 101 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 101 transition count 140
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 101 transition count 136
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 279 place count 95 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 95 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 95 transition count 129
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 291 place count 90 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 90 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 90 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 300 place count 89 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 89 transition count 114
Applied a total of 301 rules in 9 ms. Remains 89 /223 variables (removed 134) and now considering 114/425 (removed 311) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:18] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:18] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 57 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/223 places, 114/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 89/223 places, 114/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15484671566955730712.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15412577430749568835.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15484671566955730712.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15412577430749568835.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11032,0.326417,16736,2,3767,5,44880,6,0,470,33938,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l1232>=1))) + EG(((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1232>=1))))) + EG(((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t64, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t73, t75, t76, t77, t...442
(forward)formula 0,0,1.79422,55676,1,0,387,224265,256,193,3237,189898,371
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 175 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 175 transition count 278
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 175 transition count 273
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 138 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 138 transition count 227
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 138 transition count 217
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 114 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 114 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 114 transition count 170
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 104 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 104 transition count 152
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 104 transition count 149
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 273 place count 99 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 99 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 99 transition count 143
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 283 place count 95 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 95 transition count 139
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 95 transition count 137
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 290 place count 94 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 94 transition count 135
Applied a total of 291 rules in 30 ms. Remains 94 /223 variables (removed 129) and now considering 135/425 (removed 290) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 94 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 94 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 54 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 226 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 94 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 67 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/223 places, 135/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 94/223 places, 135/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15650592504344901525.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11634285975022310513.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15650592504344901525.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11634285975022310513.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11659,0.317559,16712,2,3635,5,39560,6,0,511,30966,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((((s1>=1)&&(l321>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l941>=1)))) * E(((p54>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U AF(E(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l612>=1))) U A(((s1>=1)&&(l1>=1)) U ((s1>=...175
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U (((s1>=1)&&(l321>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l941>=1))))),((p54>=1)&&(l0>=1))) * !(EG(!(E(!(E(TRUE ...316
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t19, t20, t42, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t...528
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 100/34/35
(forward)formula 0,0,2.66867,83924,1,0,380,364042,321,173,3678,232629,468
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 173 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 173 transition count 264
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 173 transition count 258
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 143 place count 136 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 136 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 136 transition count 202
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 112 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 112 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 112 transition count 158
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 259 place count 100 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 100 transition count 137
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 100 transition count 131
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 283 place count 94 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 94 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 94 transition count 124
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 295 place count 89 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 89 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 89 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 88 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 88 transition count 110
Applied a total of 304 rules in 22 ms. Remains 88 /223 variables (removed 135) and now considering 110/425 (removed 315) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 88 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 88 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 209 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 88 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/223 places, 110/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 88/223 places, 110/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2317 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=454 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 477 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=666 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 13640 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=568 )
Probabilistic random walk after 13640 steps, saw 6128 distinct states, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=568 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 178 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 178 transition count 287
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 178 transition count 279
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 146 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 146 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 146 transition count 230
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 191 place count 126 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 126 transition count 202
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 126 transition count 191
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 117 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 117 transition count 177
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 117 transition count 171
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 249 place count 114 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 114 transition count 168
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 254 place count 112 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 112 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 112 transition count 165
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 111 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 111 transition count 163
Applied a total of 259 rules in 19 ms. Remains 111 /223 variables (removed 112) and now considering 163/425 (removed 262) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 111 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 111 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 65 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 199 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 260 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 111 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 63 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/223 places, 163/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 111/223 places, 163/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11110033460096271492.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11619566324423812660.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11110033460096271492.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11619566324423812660.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19878,0.931518,34896,2,5410,5,88480,6,0,607,66054,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(!(A(E(((s1>=1)&&(l610>=1)) U (((!((s1>=1)&&(l1235>=1)))||((s1>=1)&&(l1222>=1)))||((s1>=1)&&(l1234>=1)))) U (AF(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1289>=1))...183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(!((E(!((!(EG(!(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1289>=1)))))) + ((p17>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) U (!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l610>=1)) U ...379
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t20, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t...671
(forward)formula 0,0,3.51376,87788,1,0,343,282378,358,129,4377,172286,368
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 178 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 178 transition count 274
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 178 transition count 270
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 144 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 144 transition count 228
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 144 transition count 219
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 123 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 123 transition count 190
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 123 transition count 182
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 230 place count 114 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 114 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 114 transition count 162
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 246 place count 111 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 111 transition count 159
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 111 transition count 158
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 251 place count 110 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 110 transition count 157
Applied a total of 252 rules in 9 ms. Remains 110 /223 variables (removed 113) and now considering 157/425 (removed 268) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 110 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 110 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 61 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 184 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 260 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 110 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 93 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/223 places, 157/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 110/223 places, 157/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 157 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6891719111382706283.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17092120872676835965.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6891719111382706283.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17092120872676835965.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20421,0.7635,29504,2,6382,5,71550,6,0,597,62894,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((EF(((p86<1)||(l447<1))) + ((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l36>=1))) * A(!(((s1>=1)&&(l36>=1))) U AX(((s1>=1)&&(l463>=1))))) * ((s1>=1)&&(l605>=1)...269
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((E(TRUE U ((p86<1)||(l447<1))) + ((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l36>=1))) * !((E(!(!(EX(!(((s...446
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t19, t20, t36, t37, t39, t47, t48, t49, t51, t52, t53,...646
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,5.27223,158060,1,0,448,676936,355,193,4200,437034,478
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 173 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 173 transition count 264
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 173 transition count 259
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 136 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 136 transition count 213
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 136 transition count 203
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 112 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 112 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 112 transition count 157
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 101 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 101 transition count 138
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 101 transition count 134
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 279 place count 95 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 95 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 95 transition count 127
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 291 place count 90 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 90 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 90 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 298 place count 89 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 89 transition count 114
Applied a total of 299 rules in 9 ms. Remains 89 /223 variables (removed 134) and now considering 114/425 (removed 311) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 149 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 232 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 57 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/223 places, 114/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 89/223 places, 114/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15759062262064306258.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1767902170038493290.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15759062262064306258.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1767902170038493290.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11657,0.258273,15148,2,3351,5,35082,6,0,470,27346,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l1291>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(((s1>=1)&&(l1291>=1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 2/0/112
(forward)formula 0,0,1.21706,44620,1,0,21,154641,20,4,2463,100005,17
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 175 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 175 transition count 268
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 175 transition count 265
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 138 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 138 transition count 219
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 138 transition count 209
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 114 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 114 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 114 transition count 163
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 252 place count 103 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 103 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 103 transition count 142
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 273 place count 97 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 97 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 97 transition count 135
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 284 place count 93 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 93 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 93 transition count 128
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 292 place count 92 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 92 transition count 126
Applied a total of 293 rules in 13 ms. Remains 92 /223 variables (removed 131) and now considering 126/425 (removed 299) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 92 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 92 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 48 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 197 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 92 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 67 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/223 places, 126/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 92/223 places, 126/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability570719405518655328.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7739435697453165207.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability570719405518655328.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7739435697453165207.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,12166,0.29609,16272,2,3638,5,38934,6,0,494,31180,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX((EG(((s1<1)||(l1226<1))) * ((s2<1)||(l1258<1)))) * EX(TRUE)) * EX(((s1<1)||(l319<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(EY(Init) * !(EG(((s1<1)||(l1226<1)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(((s2<1)||(l1258<1))))] = FALSE) * [(Init *...226
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t19, t20, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t51, t52, t53, t...524
(forward)formula 0,1,2.32871,80172,1,0,375,372807,277,153,3403,217641,419
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 178 transition count 288
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 178 transition count 288
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 178 transition count 282
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 145 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 145 transition count 242
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 145 transition count 233
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 193 place count 123 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 123 transition count 200
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 123 transition count 189
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 236 place count 113 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 113 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 113 transition count 168
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 256 place count 109 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 109 transition count 164
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 109 transition count 163
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 263 place count 107 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 107 transition count 161
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 107 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 268 place count 106 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 106 transition count 157
Applied a total of 269 rules in 13 ms. Remains 106 /223 variables (removed 117) and now considering 157/425 (removed 268) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 106 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 106 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 65 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 106 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 73 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/223 places, 157/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 106/223 places, 157/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 157 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5630015675967064395.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4286198767213154660.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5630015675967064395.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4286198767213154660.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17215,0.467859,24140,2,5324,5,58005,6,0,581,42658,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(E(!((((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l610>=1))) + AF(((s1>=1)&&(l306>=1)))) * (s1>=1)) * (l945>=1))) U ((p29>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1238>=1...251
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((Init * !(EX(((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l1282>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l606>=1))) * EX(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1216>=1))))))))...323
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t19, t20, t22, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t54, t...670
(forward)formula 0,1,4.32697,134880,1,0,568,642393,364,242,4115,373880,650
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 223/223 places, 425/425 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 173 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 173 transition count 264
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 173 transition count 259
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 136 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 136 transition count 213
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 136 transition count 203
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 112 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 112 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 112 transition count 157
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 101 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 101 transition count 140
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 101 transition count 136
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 279 place count 95 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 95 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 95 transition count 129
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 291 place count 90 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 90 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 90 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 300 place count 89 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 89 transition count 114
Applied a total of 301 rules in 24 ms. Remains 89 /223 variables (removed 134) and now considering 114/425 (removed 311) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 216 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 89 cols
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 61 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/223 places, 114/425 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 89/223 places, 114/425 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability299245194656985447.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability680089662243497452.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability299245194656985447.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability680089662243497452.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...272
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11480,0.254335,15256,2,3315,5,36205,6,0,470,28787,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((s1>=1)&&(l1229>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((s1>=1)&&(l1229>=1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 2/0/112
(forward)formula 0,0,1.23915,45088,1,0,20,159672,20,4,2452,102752,16
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2022-06-09 12:04:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-06-09 12:04:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Total runtime 69704 ms.

BK_STOP 1654776283750

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281900186"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;