Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r312-tall-165472281800146.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281800146
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 544K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K Jun 7 17:15 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K Jun 7 17:15 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K Jun 7 17:14 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K Jun 7 17:14 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Jun 6 15:23 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Jun 6 15:23 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Jun 6 15:23 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Jun 6 15:23 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 6 12:11 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Jun 7 17:15 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Jun 7 17:15 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Jun 7 17:15 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K Jun 7 17:15 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Jun 6 15:23 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:23 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K Jun 6 12:11 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1654774398658

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-06-09 11:33:19] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-06-09 11:33:19] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-06-09 11:33:19] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 95 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] Transformed 553 places.
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 553 places and 150 transitions in 193 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 444 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 444 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 65 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 150/150 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 99 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 99 transition count 135
Applied a total of 24 rules in 16 ms. Remains 99 /109 variables (removed 10) and now considering 135/150 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 99 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 12 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 170 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 99 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 61 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 338 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 99 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 116 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/109 places, 135/150 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 99/109 places, 135/150 transitions.
Support contains 65 out of 99 places after structural reductions.
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2298 resets, run finished after 631 ms. (steps per millisecond=15 ) properties (out of 55) seen :21
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 110 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 92 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 107 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 33) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 62 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 84 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 32) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 118 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 115 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 31) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 118 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 108 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 60 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 105 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 29 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 99 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:21] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:33:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:33:22] [INFO ] After 642ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:28
[2022-06-09 11:33:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:33:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:33:22] [INFO ] After 336ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :28
[2022-06-09 11:33:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 61 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:33:23] [INFO ] After 434ms SMT Verify possible using 61 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :28
[2022-06-09 11:33:23] [INFO ] After 981ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :28
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 416 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:33:24] [INFO ] After 1897ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :28
Fused 29 Parikh solutions to 28 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 269 ms.
Support contains 36 out of 99 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 94 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 94 transition count 126
Applied a total of 10 rules in 28 ms. Remains 94 /99 variables (removed 5) and now considering 126/135 (removed 9) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 94/99 places, 126/135 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2265 resets, run finished after 341 ms. (steps per millisecond=29 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 105 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 61 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 102 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 115 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 115 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 99 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 92 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 9479 steps, run visited all 26 properties in 99 ms. (steps per millisecond=95 )
Probabilistic random walk after 9479 steps, saw 4344 distinct states, run finished after 99 ms. (steps per millisecond=95 ) properties seen :26
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 6 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 82 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 82 transition count 107
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 75 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 75 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 75 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 74 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 74 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 73 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 73 transition count 95
Applied a total of 54 rules in 32 ms. Remains 73 /99 variables (removed 26) and now considering 95/135 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 208 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 52 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/99 places, 95/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 73/99 places, 95/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13329240219647463914.gal : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14764760215262786044.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13329240219647463914.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14764760215262786044.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,489933,1.75146,51604,2,9626,5,169721,6,0,387,162584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EF(!(A(A(((s1>=1)&&(l133>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))) U ((p15>=1)&&(l0>=1))))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l0>=1))) U A(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1)) U !(((!(A...326
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(!(((!(!((E(!(((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1))) U (!(((p38>=1)&&(l136>=1))) * !(((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))...2693
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t52,...404
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,14.54,364788,1,0,515,1.93487e+06,249,242,2764,1.66758e+06,658
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 80 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 80 transition count 99
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 72 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 72 transition count 91
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 70 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 70 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 69 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 69 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 68 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 68 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 67 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 67 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 67 transition count 81
Applied a total of 68 rules in 23 ms. Remains 67 /99 variables (removed 32) and now considering 81/135 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 52 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/99 places, 81/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 67/99 places, 81/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5437413319489553560.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12014947424345445341.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5437413319489553560.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12014947424345445341.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,351345,1.6983,46768,2,8827,5,160433,6,0,349,144098,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l492>=1))) * A((((s1>=1)&&(l353>=1)) + AG(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1)))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l127>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l492>=1)))))) * !(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l127>=1)))))) * !(E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l127>...268
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t11, t24, t29, t41, t42, t43, t49, t50, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t6...336
(forward)formula 0,1,11.628,228956,1,0,333,1.24516e+06,195,142,2437,983565,376
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 81 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 81 transition count 104
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 71 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 71 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 71 transition count 92
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 68 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 68 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 66 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 82
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 64 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 64 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 64 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 63 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 63 transition count 76
Applied a total of 78 rules in 26 ms. Remains 63 /99 variables (removed 36) and now considering 76/135 (removed 59) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 55 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/99 places, 76/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/99 places, 76/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2577312070803790721.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16431814500468376926.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2577312070803790721.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16431814500468376926.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,166234,0.803545,29160,2,6727,5,92415,6,0,328,81932,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG(A(!(((p14>=1)&&(l156>=1))) U EF(EG(((p10>=1)&&(l153>=1)))))) U (AG(((((p28>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((p14>=1)&&(l156>=1)))&&(!((s1>=1)&&(l149>...298
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((((p28>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((p14>=1)&&(l156>=1)))&&(!((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))))))) * !((E...968
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t11, t19, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t48, t54, t5...356
(forward)formula 0,0,6.95914,184692,1,0,367,927952,198,172,2284,789776,473
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 81 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 81 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 81 transition count 104
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 73 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 73 transition count 96
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 71 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 71 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 71 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 70 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 70 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 69 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 69 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 69 transition count 86
Applied a total of 64 rules in 14 ms. Remains 69 /99 variables (removed 30) and now considering 86/135 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 69 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:59] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 69 cols
[2022-06-09 11:33:59] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:33:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:34:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 110 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 69 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:00] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:00] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/99 places, 86/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 69/99 places, 86/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15555569653382282237.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17717137397059153625.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15555569653382282237.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17717137397059153625.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,477772,1.08489,35552,2,6417,5,134221,6,0,362,102529,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EX(AX(((s1<1)||(l504<1)))) + !(E((((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1))&&(!((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1)))) U !((((s1>=1)&&(l336>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1))))))...178
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((EX(!(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l504<1)))))) + !(E((((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1))&&(!((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1)))) U !((((s1>=1...227
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t42, t43, t44, t50, t52, t53, t54, t57, t58, t59, t63, t64, t65, t6...351
(forward)formula 0,1,6.55056,168748,1,0,416,718760,202,240,2506,925848,373
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 79 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 79 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 79 transition count 100
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 69 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 69 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 69 transition count 88
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 67 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 67 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 66 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 66 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 65 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 65 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 64 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 64 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 64 transition count 78
Applied a total of 76 rules in 16 ms. Remains 64 /99 variables (removed 35) and now considering 78/135 (removed 57) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 64 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 64 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 64 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/99 places, 78/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 64/99 places, 78/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7380339832020922049.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13338996021448482790.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7380339832020922049.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13338996021448482790.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,254990,1.37199,44352,2,7847,5,156382,6,0,334,136244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1))) * (AF((((AX(((s1<1)||(l116<1))) + (s1<1)) + ((l150<1)||(s1<1))) + (l0<1))) + AG(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1))))) * (!(EG(!((((!(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l116<1))))) + (s1<1)) + ((l150<1)||(s...226
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t11, t20, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t49, t57, t5...351
(forward)formula 0,0,12.4586,320808,1,0,464,1.63711e+06,200,242,2330,1.63928e+06,455
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 77 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 77 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 77 transition count 94
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 67 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 67 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 82
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 65 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 64 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 64 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 63 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 63 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 63 transition count 74
Applied a total of 77 rules in 14 ms. Remains 63 /99 variables (removed 36) and now considering 74/135 (removed 61) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 36 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/99 places, 74/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/99 places, 74/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3146494881678547968.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4724912409501989686.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3146494881678547968.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4724912409501989686.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,268109,0.495867,21820,2,5792,5,67302,6,0,326,68023,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(A(!(EF((((s1>=1)&&(l32>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l335>=1))))) U ((s5>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + EX(AG(AF((((s8<1)||(l151<1))&&((s1<1)||(l337<1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(EY((Init * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((((s8<1)||(l151<1))&&((s1<1)||(l337<1))))))))))))),!(((s5>=1)&...381
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t48, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t6...296
(forward)formula 0,1,2.09758,65044,1,0,201,271843,188,81,2259,246888,229
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 78 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 78 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 78 transition count 95
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 67 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 67 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 82
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 64 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 64 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 64 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 62 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 62 transition count 72
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 60 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 60 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 60 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 59 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 59 transition count 67
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 59 transition count 66
Applied a total of 87 rules in 5 ms. Remains 59 /99 variables (removed 40) and now considering 66/135 (removed 69) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:21] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:21] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:34:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:22] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:22] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 47 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/99 places, 66/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 59/99 places, 66/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9607021177886542166.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1210558684208041198.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9607021177886542166.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1210558684208041198.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,139778,0.346228,16652,2,5082,5,45735,6,0,302,46980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(AX(((p22>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(EX(!(((p22>=1)&&(l0>=1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t41, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t5...291
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,3.16264,93824,1,0,316,381057,161,177,2109,485431,275
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 78 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 78 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 78 transition count 99
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 67 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 67 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 86
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 64 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 64 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 64 transition count 79
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 62 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 62 transition count 76
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 60 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 60 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 60 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 59 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 59 transition count 71
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 59 transition count 69
Applied a total of 88 rules in 14 ms. Remains 59 /99 variables (removed 40) and now considering 69/135 (removed 66) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 47 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/99 places, 69/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 59/99 places, 69/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10478744575432535548.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15308322049666123720.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10478744575432535548.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15308322049666123720.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,141041,0.325519,16208,2,5124,5,44467,6,0,305,41475,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1/0/68
(forward)formula 0,0,1.81494,54876,1,0,20,214473,20,4,1612,169360,16
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 81 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 81 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 81 transition count 102
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 75 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 75 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 75 transition count 94
Applied a total of 51 rules in 6 ms. Remains 75 /99 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/135 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 75 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 75 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 75 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/99 places, 94/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 75/99 places, 94/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16083409262298887118.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15401385916689805198.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16083409262298887118.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15401385916689805198.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,780089,2.20075,64168,2,10866,5,236454,6,0,394,191748,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(EF((((s1>=1)&&(l490>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l133>=1))))) U AX((E(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1)) U ((p18>=1)&&(l115>=1))) + A(!(((s1<1)||(l504<1))) U (...179
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (((s1>=1)&&(l490>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l133>=1)))))))) * !(EX(!((E(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=...320
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t24, t29, t49, t50, t51, t55, t56, t59, t60, t61, t68, t69,...374
(forward)formula 0,0,18.9065,438676,1,0,394,2.36694e+06,229,165,2735,1.84698e+06,458
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 82 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 82 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 82 transition count 105
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 73 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 73 transition count 96
Applied a total of 53 rules in 3 ms. Remains 73 /99 variables (removed 26) and now considering 96/135 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 55 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/99 places, 96/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 73/99 places, 96/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6441136799414552972.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:34:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2094169813503537594.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6441136799414552972.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2094169813503537594.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,699720,1.62233,51184,2,6954,5,209132,6,0,388,124255,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(((E(EF(((p21>=1)&&(l126>=1))) U E(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1)))) + !(EG(((s1>=1)&&(l353>=1))))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l510>=1)))...423
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EG(!(!(EX(!(EG(((s1>=1)&&(l335>=1))))))))) + ((!(!((E(!((((!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1))) U (!...2310
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t28, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t59, t62, t63, t64, t71, t72,...369
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,21.3102,537892,1,0,853,3.0245e+06,266,464,2750,2.43567e+06,992
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 84 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 84 transition count 113
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 78 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 78 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 78 transition count 105
Applied a total of 46 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /99 variables (removed 21) and now considering 105/135 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 78 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 78 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 78 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 54 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 78/99 places, 105/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 78/99 places, 105/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2685651818178647133.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability577085853692514258.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2685651818178647133.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability577085853692514258.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.09606e+06,1.978,59472,2,6215,5,224034,6,0,417,139020,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((p36>=1)&&(l137>=1))) + E(((!(((p21>=1)&&(l126>=1))) + AF(((((s1>=1)&&(l1>=1))&&((s4>=1)&&(l0>=1)))||(((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1))&&((s1>=1)...347
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p36>=1)&&(l137>=1)))] != FALSE + ([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,((!(((p21>=1)&&(l126>=1))) + !(EG(!(...661
(forward)formula 0,1,1.97976,59472,1,0,7,224034,8,1,422,139020,1
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 77 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 77 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 77 transition count 94
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 66 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 81
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 63 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 74
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 61 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 59 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 59 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 59 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 58 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 58 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 58 transition count 64
Applied a total of 90 rules in 15 ms. Remains 58 /99 variables (removed 41) and now considering 64/135 (removed 71) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 37 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/99 places, 64/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 58/99 places, 64/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7383590690926507663.gal : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3773619075219756306.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7383590690926507663.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3773619075219756306.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,133604,0.318879,16540,2,4969,5,44105,6,0,296,44127,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((s1>=1)&&(l91>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((s1>=1)&&(l91>=1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1/0/63
(forward)formula 0,0,2.18516,69752,1,0,20,263622,20,4,1570,235992,16
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 82 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 82 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 82 transition count 103
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 72 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 72 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 72 transition count 92
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 70 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 70 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 70 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 69 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 69 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 68 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 67 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 67 transition count 83
Applied a total of 68 rules in 6 ms. Remains 67 /99 variables (removed 32) and now considering 83/135 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 43 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/99 places, 83/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 67/99 places, 83/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14248520483226894962.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3035113968092398131.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14248520483226894962.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3035113968092398131.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,300372,1.13796,39364,2,9892,5,132074,6,0,351,127715,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG(AG(!(A(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1)))))) + (AX(AG(((s1<1)||(l489<1)))) * !(E(!((((p25>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((s6>=1)&&(l0>=...187
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))...331
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t50, t51, t59, t60, t6...361
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,20.323,523268,1,0,802,2.76407e+06,216,433,2502,2.70935e+06,843
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 78 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 78 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 78 transition count 95
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 67 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 67 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 82
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 65 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 65 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 64 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 64 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 62 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 62 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 62 transition count 73
Applied a total of 79 rules in 11 ms. Remains 62 /99 variables (removed 37) and now considering 73/135 (removed 62) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 62 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 62 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 62 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 39 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/99 places, 73/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 62/99 places, 73/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5245916690621215069.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10911352763088428350.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5245916690621215069.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10911352763088428350.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,232662,0.804159,29660,2,6500,5,96324,6,0,321,90081,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(AG(((p22<1)||(l0<1)))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1)))),!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p22<1)||(l0<1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t44, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t6...296
(forward)formula 0,0,3.87715,101064,1,0,183,478065,176,79,2233,378947,204
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 77 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 77 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 77 transition count 94
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 66 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 81
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 63 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 74
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 61 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 59 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 59 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 59 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 58 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 58 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 58 transition count 64
Applied a total of 90 rules in 23 ms. Remains 58 /99 variables (removed 41) and now considering 64/135 (removed 71) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:37] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:37] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:35:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:35:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:37] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 37 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/99 places, 64/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 58/99 places, 64/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14574910446695554968.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10369769673335271909.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14574910446695554968.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10369769673335271909.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,133604,0.326937,16552,2,4969,5,44105,6,0,296,44127,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t40, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t5...286
(forward)formula 0,1,3.95616,117400,1,0,331,511164,155,183,2037,593329,295
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 135/135 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 79 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 79 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 79 transition count 98
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 69 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 69 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 69 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 68 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 67 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 83
Applied a total of 67 rules in 7 ms. Remains 67 /99 variables (removed 32) and now considering 83/135 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/99 places, 83/135 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 67/99 places, 83/135 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability64977579358512808.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1503542986026342778.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability64977579358512808.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1503542986026342778.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...272
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,457102,1.07083,36760,2,5733,5,132103,6,0,351,105344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l503>=1)))) * EF(((AF(((s1<1)||(l336<1))) * (s1>=1)) * ((l90>=1)&&(((s1<1)||(l33<1))||((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l503>=1))))))))),TRUE) * ((l90>=1)&&(((s1<1)||(l33<1)...234
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t28, t46, t47, t48, t52, t54, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67,...329
(forward)formula 0,0,3.58905,94344,1,0,221,415581,199,86,2499,333096,259
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2022-06-09 11:35:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 146047 ms.

BK_STOP 1654774545883

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281800146"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;