About the Execution of ITS-Tools for UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 286.943 | 23944.00 | 43167.00 | 342.60 | FFFTFFTTFFFFFFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r276-smll-165307353000148.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r276-smll-165307353000148
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 464K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 29 18:03 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 122K Apr 29 18:03 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 29 18:01 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 133K Apr 29 18:01 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K May 9 09:19 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 35K May 9 09:19 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 9 09:19 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K May 9 09:19 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 9 09:19 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 9 09:19 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 10 09:34 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1653145304022
Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-21 15:01:46] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-21 15:01:46] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-21 15:01:46] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 149 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:46] [INFO ] Transformed 72 places.
[2022-05-21 15:01:46] [INFO ] Transformed 108 transitions.
[2022-05-21 15:01:46] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 72 places and 108 transitions in 388 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 25 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
[2022-05-21 15:01:46] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-21 15:01:46] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-21 15:01:46] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-21 15:01:46] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 16 transitions.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 51 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:47] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 41 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 367 ms returned [51]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 444 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 71/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Support contains 51 out of 71 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-21 15:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 63 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 261 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 ) properties (out of 17) seen :16
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=357 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 71 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:48] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:48] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:01:48] [INFO ] After 83ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0
Fused 1 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(X((!F(G(p0)) U F(X(G((p0 U X(p1)))))))))'
Support contains 12 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:49] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:49] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:49] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 102 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 316 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-01 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (GEQ s44 1) (GEQ s43 1) (GEQ s46 1) (GEQ s45 1)), p1:(OR (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s18 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s21 1) (GEQ s14 1) (GEQ s...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8981 reset in 467 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 29647 steps with 2635 reset with depth 7 and stack size 7 in 115 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-01 finished in 1272 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(X((X(X(p0))&&(F(p2)||p1)))))'
Support contains 12 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:50] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:50] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 135 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 213 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:50] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:50] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 113 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 241 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (NOT p0), true]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-02 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 5}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(OR (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s18 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s21 1) (GEQ s14 1) (GEQ s15 1)), p2:(AND (LT s41 1) (LT s40 1) (LT s39 1) (LT s38 ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 4 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-02 finished in 602 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(!(!X((p0 U !p1)) U (G((G(p2)&&p3))&&G(!p1))))'
Support contains 16 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 63 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 62 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 62 transition count 68
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 58 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 58 transition count 64
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 54 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 54 transition count 56
Applied a total of 42 rules in 26 ms. Remains 54 /71 variables (removed 17) and now considering 56/92 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:50] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:50] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 71 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/71 places, 56/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 54/71 places, 56/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 38 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p2 p3)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2 p3), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (LT s36 1) (LT s35 1) (LT s34 1) (LT s33 1)), p2:(OR (GEQ s43 1) (GEQ s42 1) (GEQ s45 1) (GEQ s44 1)), p3:(OR (GEQ s15 1) (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Initial state of product has no viable successors after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-03 finished in 295 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 11 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 43 transition count 56
Applied a total of 64 rules in 13 ms. Remains 43 /71 variables (removed 28) and now considering 56/92 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 43 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 43 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 43 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 9 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 73 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/71 places, 56/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 43/71 places, 56/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s3 1) (GEQ s22 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s22 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s7 1) (GEQ s22 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s2 1) ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 425 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 287 steps with 0 reset with depth 288 and stack size 288 in 3 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-04 finished in 686 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 16 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 71 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 47 transition count 68
Applied a total of 48 rules in 12 ms. Remains 47 /71 variables (removed 24) and now considering 68/92 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 47 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned [38]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/71 places, 68/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 46/71 places, 68/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (GEQ s32 1) (GEQ s33 1) (GEQ s34 1) (GEQ s35 1) (GEQ s36 1) (GEQ s37 1) (GEQ s22 1) (GEQ s23 1) (GEQ s24 1) (GEQ s25 1) (GEQ s26 1) (GEQ s27 1) (GE...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13930 reset in 223 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 366 steps with 53 reset with depth 14 and stack size 14 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-05 finished in 450 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 8 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 47 transition count 68
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 46 transition count 52
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 45 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 41 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 41 transition count 44
Applied a total of 67 rules in 14 ms. Remains 41 /71 variables (removed 30) and now considering 44/92 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 15:01:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 69 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/71 places, 44/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 41/71 places, 44/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 51 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-06 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (GEQ s15 1) (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s18 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s13 1) (GEQ s14 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11050 reset in 237 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11081 reset in 248 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 157 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 62 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 5 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=2 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 173 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 48 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:01:53] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 15:01:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 33 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:01:53] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 15:01:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:01:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 15:01:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 38 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:01:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 36/60/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2022-05-21 15:01:53] [INFO ] Added : 26 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 96 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 8 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 78 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 41/41 places, 44/44 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 151 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 46 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 11 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=5 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 182 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 47 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 46 ms :[(NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 56 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 15:01:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 41 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:01:55] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 36/60/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 6 ms.
[2022-05-21 15:01:55] [INFO ] Added : 26 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 81 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 57 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11062 reset in 239 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11056 reset in 256 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin15806365056832503609
[2022-05-21 15:01:55] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 44 transitions.
[2022-05-21 15:01:55] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 15:01:55] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 44 transitions.
[2022-05-21 15:01:55] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 15:01:55] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 44 transitions.
[2022-05-21 15:01:55] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 15:01:55] [INFO ] Built C files in 32ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin15806365056832503609
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15806365056832503609;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 521 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15806365056832503609;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 67 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin15806365056832503609;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased6134335919841978892.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 280 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-06 finished in 4264 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(F((X(p0)&&p1)))||F(p2))))'
Support contains 23 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:56] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:56] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 185 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:56] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 171 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 184 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-07 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p2:(OR (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s18 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s21 1) (GEQ s14 1) (GEQ s15 1) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s9 1) (GEQ s42 1)) (AND (GEQ s...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23686 reset in 435 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23637 reset in 321 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 462 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP to 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 141 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Finished random walk after 36 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (F (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (AND p1 (NOT p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 527 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP to 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 165 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 163 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:01:59] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:01:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 21 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:01:59] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 15:01:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 97 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:01:59] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 15:01:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:01:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 15:01:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 68 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 20 ms.
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] Added : 62 causal constraints over 13 iterations in 228 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 64 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 69 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 13 ms.
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] Added : 62 causal constraints over 13 iterations in 199 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))
Support contains 23 out of 63 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 63/63 places, 84/84 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:00] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:01] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 201 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:01] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 127 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/63 places, 84/84 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 384 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP to 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 173 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Finished random walk after 22 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=5 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (F (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (AND p1 (NOT p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 538 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP to 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 167 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 183 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:02] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:02] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 91 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 67 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] Added : 62 causal constraints over 13 iterations in 208 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 67 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 68 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 15:02:03] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 13 ms.
[2022-05-21 15:02:04] [INFO ] Added : 62 causal constraints over 13 iterations in 204 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 171 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23650 reset in 380 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23684 reset in 372 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin310294451136473226
[2022-05-21 15:02:05] [INFO ] Built C files in 6ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin310294451136473226
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin310294451136473226;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 240 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin310294451136473226;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 41 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin310294451136473226;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased15348012457778005798.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 201 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-07 finished in 9222 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 46 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 46 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 42 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 42 transition count 48
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 38 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 38 transition count 40
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 34 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 34 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 34 transition count 32
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 34 transition count 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 30 transition count 28
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 21 transition count 20
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 18 transition count 17
Applied a total of 117 rules in 19 ms. Remains 18 /71 variables (removed 53) and now considering 17/92 (removed 75) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 17 rows 18 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 17 rows 18 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 15:02:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 17 rows 18 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 40 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 18/71 places, 17/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 18/71 places, 17/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-08 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(LT s12 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 244 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 43 steps with 0 reset with depth 44 and stack size 41 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-08 finished in 491 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(F(X((F(X(p0))&&p1))))||F(p2)))'
Support contains 6 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 48 transition count 61
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 41 transition count 54
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 40 transition count 53
Applied a total of 70 rules in 17 ms. Remains 40 /71 variables (removed 31) and now considering 53/92 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 40 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:06] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 40 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:06] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 15:02:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 40 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:06] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 86 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/71 places, 53/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/71 places, 53/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 157 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-09 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s11 1) (GEQ s23 1)), p0:(AND (GEQ s21 1) (GEQ s34 1)), p1:(GEQ s3 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4989 reset in 315 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 499 steps with 25 reset with depth 44 and stack size 44 in 7 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-09 finished in 757 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 46 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 46 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 42 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 42 transition count 48
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 38 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 38 transition count 40
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 34 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 34 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 34 transition count 32
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 34 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 31 transition count 29
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 22 transition count 21
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 19 transition count 18
Applied a total of 115 rules in 24 ms. Remains 19 /71 variables (removed 52) and now considering 18/92 (removed 74) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 19 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:07] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 19 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:07] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 15:02:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 19 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:07] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 32 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/71 places, 18/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 19/71 places, 18/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-10 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(LT s9 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 217 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 31 steps with 0 reset with depth 32 and stack size 29 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-10 finished in 423 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 46 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 46 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 42 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 42 transition count 48
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 38 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 38 transition count 40
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 34 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 34 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 34 transition count 32
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 34 transition count 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 30 transition count 28
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 23 transition count 21
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 20 transition count 18
Applied a total of 114 rules in 27 ms. Remains 20 /71 variables (removed 51) and now considering 18/92 (removed 74) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 20 cols
[2022-05-21 15:02:07] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 15:02:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [10]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/71 places, 18/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 19 /19 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 19/71 places, 18/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 47 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(GEQ s1 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 162 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 19 steps with 0 reset with depth 20 and stack size 20 in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-11 finished in 314 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 21343 ms.
BK_STOP 1653145327966
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r276-smll-165307353000148"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T3N04 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;