Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r168-tall-165277017300906.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r168-tall-165277017300906
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 288K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K Apr 30 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 75K Apr 30 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Apr 30 13:20 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K Apr 30 13:20 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 9 08:30 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 9 08:30 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 9 08:30 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 9 08:30 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 9 08:30 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 9 08:30 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652981018698

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-19 17:23:39] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-19 17:23:39] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-19 17:23:39] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2022-05-19 17:23:40] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2022-05-19 17:23:40] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 627 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:40] [INFO ] Imported 30 HL places and 26 HL transitions for a total of 270 PT places and 116.0 transition bindings in 24 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:23:40] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 30 places and 26 transitions 77 arcs in 5 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:23:40] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Computed a total of 30 stabilizing places and 26 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 30 transition count 26
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
AF dead knowledge conclusive for 9 formulas.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Remains 11 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Computed a total of 30 stabilizing places and 26 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 30 transition count 26
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 755 resets, run finished after 278 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 ) properties (out of 18) seen :14
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 263 resets, run finished after 115 ms. (steps per millisecond=86 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 345 resets, run finished after 106 ms. (steps per millisecond=94 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 262 resets, run finished after 105 ms. (steps per millisecond=95 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 264 resets, run finished after 82 ms. (steps per millisecond=121 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 4 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 10 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] After 29ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2 real:2
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] After 46ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:4
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] After 178ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:4
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] After 30ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] After 50ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 18 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] After 141ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 34 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=11 )
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 2 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Domain [tsid(7), tsid(7)] of place n9 breaks symmetries in sort tsid
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 270 places and 116 transitions 659 arcs in 13 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] Unfolded 14 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 147 out of 270 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 270/270 places, 116/116 transitions.
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 116
Applied a total of 18 rules in 22 ms. Remains 252 /270 variables (removed 18) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2022-05-19 17:23:41] [INFO ] Computed 138 place invariants in 37 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 267 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2022-05-19 17:23:42] [INFO ] Computed 138 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 312 ms returned [197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 584 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/270 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 245/270 places, 116/116 transitions.
Support contains 147 out of 245 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-19 17:23:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 982 resets, run finished after 412 ms. (steps per millisecond=24 ) properties (out of 27) seen :7
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 20 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 16 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 11 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 17 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 11 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 15 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 11 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 11 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 19 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 11 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 20 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:23:43] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 132 generalized place invariants in 43 ms returned sat
[2022-05-19 17:23:43] [INFO ] After 438ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:20
[2022-05-19 17:23:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 132 generalized place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2022-05-19 17:23:44] [INFO ] After 541ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :18
[2022-05-19 17:23:45] [INFO ] After 958ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :18
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 281 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:23:45] [INFO ] After 1488ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :18
Fused 20 Parikh solutions to 15 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 41 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 14 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=13 )
Parikh walk visited 18 properties in 5 ms.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2022-05-19 17:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
Computed a total of 245 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 245 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
AF dead knowledge conclusive for 1 formulas.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:23:45] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:23:45] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 11 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 255 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 440 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:23:45] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 112 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:23:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:23:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12985307761148644599.gal : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:23:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5834650305533630470.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12985307761148644599.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5834650305533630470.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.31718,93068,2,123020,5,426503,6,0,1085,214962,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 17:24:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-19 17:24:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:24:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16774549170449980612.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16774549170449980612.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16774549170449980612.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16774549170449980612.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16774549170449980612.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:24:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:24:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:24:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:24:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2022-05-19 17:24:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 32 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:24:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14091196983004189694.gal : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:24:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2130058883329456911.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14091196983004189694.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2130058883329456911.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,5.19382,171628,25623,2669,264154,8121,555,1.17646e+06,100,140379,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((i4.u43.a3_0<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(i4.u43.a3_0<1))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:24:46] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:24:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:24:46] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:24:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 291 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 454 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:24:46] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:24:47] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 98 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:24:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-19 17:24:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-19 17:24:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:24:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-19 17:24:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-19 17:24:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability242675351694262172.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 17:24:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16684200103716780221.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability242675351694262172.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16684200103716780221.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,2.9681,93540,2,123020,5,426503,6,0,1085,214962,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AG((((((malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(s6_6<1))&&((malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(s6_0<1)))&&(((malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(s6_1<1))&&((malici...2218
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !((((((malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(s6_6<1))&&((malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(s6_0<1)))&&(((...1877
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
[2022-05-19 17:25:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-19 17:25:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:25:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13183275493479500928.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13183275493479500928.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13183275493479500928.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13183275493479500928.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13183275493479500928.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:25:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:25:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:25:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:25:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2022-05-19 17:25:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 36 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:25:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2375917236067349733.gal : 22 ms
[2022-05-19 17:25:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2106653434155290545.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2375917236067349733.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2106653434155290545.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.01473,126384,17307,2657,227992,13798,560,342280,97,826120,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AG((((((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(u42.s6_6<1))&&((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(u37.s6_0<1)))&&(((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(u...3019
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !((((((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(u42.s6_6<1))&&((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(u37....3094
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...391
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,29.3712,749052,1,0,1.46746e+06,64140,3513,2.16101e+06,976,3.64749e+06,3165205
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:25:46] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:25:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 144 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:25:47] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:25:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 259 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 405 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:25:47] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:25:47] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 94 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:25:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 17:25:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 17:25:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:25:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:25:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:25:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability566782040777058598.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 17:25:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13323767329363708178.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability566782040777058598.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13323767329363708178.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,2.92363,93196,2,123020,5,426503,6,0,1085,214962,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 17:26:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-19 17:26:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:26:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10293620720117330623.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10293620720117330623.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10293620720117330623.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10293620720117330623.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10293620720117330623.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:26:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:26:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:26:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:26:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2022-05-19 17:26:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:26:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability429635012085947274.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 17:26:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5273704880780487306.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability429635012085947274.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5273704880780487306.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...252
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.07032,132556,22190,2633,244008,14013,590,350511,100,826965,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(A(!(AF(EX((((((i6.i0.u9.n3_0>=1)&&(i6.i0.u25.s2_0>=1))||((i5.i1.u16.n3_3>=1)&&(i5.i1.u26.s2_3>=1)))||(((i2.i1.u11.n3_4>=1)&&(i2.i1.u...506
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(((((i5.i0.u33.s4_3>=1)||(i7.i0.u32.s4_2>=1))||((i1.u30.s4_1>=1)||(i6.i1.u31.s4_0>=1)))||(((i...903
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...391
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 677 edges and 245 vertex of which 237 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 20 ms. Remains 237 /245 variables (removed 8) and now considering 114/116 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 237 cols
[2022-05-19 17:26:47] [INFO ] Computed 126 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:26:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 144 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 237 cols
[2022-05-19 17:26:47] [INFO ] Computed 126 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:26:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 322 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-19 17:26:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 237 cols
[2022-05-19 17:26:48] [INFO ] Computed 126 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:26:48] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 79 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/245 places, 114/116 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 237/245 places, 114/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:26:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:26:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:26:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:26:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:26:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:26:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16834417069014007745.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 17:26:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4356137088941166796.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16834417069014007745.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4356137088941166796.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,823304,2.5003,89196,2,111119,5,403453,6,0,1052,189424,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 17:27:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:27:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:27:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1949458293071565441.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1949458293071565441.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1949458293071565441.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1949458293071565441.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1949458293071565441.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:27:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:27:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:27:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 62 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:27:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-19 17:27:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 58 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:27:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13606142533086035010.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 17:27:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14466629924116093908.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13606142533086035010.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14466629924116093908.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,823304,6.18512,223992,11296,3387,196091,16598,546,665533,119,2.78982e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((i2.i0.u35.a3_0>=1) * (((i2.i0.u36.a1_0<1) * ((A((i2.i0.u35.a2_0>=1) U (i2.i2.u5.a4_0<1)) + EG(((((i5.u3.s4_3>=1)||(i7.u2.s4_2>=1))||...1531
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i2.i0.u35.a3_0>=1)) * (i2.i0.u36.a1_0<1)) * !(EG(!((i2.i2.u5.a4_0<1))))) * !(E(!((i2....1942
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t10, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t20, t21, t24, t27, t29, t37, t39, ...352
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 244 transition count 115
Applied a total of 1 rules in 31 ms. Remains 244 /245 variables (removed 1) and now considering 115/116 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-19 17:27:48] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:27:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-19 17:27:48] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:27:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 221 ms returned [183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 368 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/245 places, 115/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 237 /237 variables (removed 0) and now considering 115/115 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 237/245 places, 115/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 17:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:27:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-19 17:27:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6404957015191876432.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 17:27:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8443118922636350317.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6404957015191876432.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8443118922636350317.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.2719e+06,3.17064,98472,2,138470,5,427773,6,0,1053,247399,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 17:28:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:28:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:28:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14984207243169435698.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14984207243169435698.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14984207243169435698.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14984207243169435698.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14984207243169435698.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:28:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:28:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:28:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 76 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:28:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-19 17:28:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 32 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:28:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3353645666077590513.gal : 16 ms
[2022-05-19 17:28:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4682600248428203434.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3353645666077590513.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4682600248428203434.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.2719e+06,2.81044,114452,18210,2669,179452,14115,462,319355,104,826912,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF(!(E((i6.u36.a4_0>=1) U (((((i2.u14.n3_0>=1)&&(i2.u19.s2_0>=1))||((i4.u16.n3_3>=1)&&(i4.u21.s2_3>=1)))||(((i5.u11.n3_4>=1)&&(i5.u22...481
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U !(E((i6.u36.a4_0>=1) U (((((i2.u14.n3_0>=1)&&(i2.u19.s2_0>=1))||((i4.u16.n3_3>=1)&&(i4.u21....530
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...385
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,24.4643,659096,1,0,1.11884e+06,66606,3048,1.91822e+06,1028,3.6505e+06,2851181
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:28:43] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:28:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:28:43] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:28:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 193 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 328 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:28:44] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-19 17:28:44] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 84 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:28:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:28:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:28:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:28:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:28:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:28:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10825478774273246318.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 17:28:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8353049392390719733.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10825478774273246318.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8353049392390719733.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.09163,93048,2,123020,5,426503,6,0,1085,214962,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 17:29:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-19 17:29:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:29:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18230618888747761996.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18230618888747761996.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18230618888747761996.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18230618888747761996.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18230618888747761996.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:29:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:29:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:29:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:29:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2022-05-19 17:29:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 18 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:29:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7808615764131705111.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 17:29:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18443155036917879110.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7808615764131705111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18443155036917879110.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.19498,129260,17443,2631,233539,16846,589,345530,100,830290,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EG((((EX(((((i3.u18.n2_0<1)||(i7.i0.u24.n2_1<1))||((i4.i1.u19.n2_2<1)||(i5.i1.u20.n2_3<1)))||(((i6.i1.u21.n2_4<1)||(i8.i0.u22.n2_5<1)...1401
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG((((EX(((((i3.u18.n2_0<1)||(i7.i0.u24.n2_1<1))||((i4.i1.u19.n2_2<1)||(i5.i1.u20.n2...2059
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...391
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 252 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 86 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1116562676942444113.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 17:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7392787125110104371.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1116562676942444113.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7392787125110104371.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,2.89367,93840,2,123020,5,426503,6,0,1085,214962,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((EG((((((n5_0>=1)&&(s3_0>=1))||((n5_4>=1)&&(s3_4>=1)))||(((n5_1>=1)&&(s3_1>=1))||((n5_3>=1)&&(s3_3>=1))))||((((n5_5>=1)&&(s3_5>=1))|...1843
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EX(((EG((((((n5_0>=1)&&(s3_0>=1))||((n5_4>=1)&&(s3_4>=1)))||(((n5_1>=1)&&(s3_1>=1))||((n5_3>=1)&&(s...2252
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 17:30:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:30:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:30:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4274905626255473010.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4274905626255473010.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4274905626255473010.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4274905626255473010.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4274905626255473010.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:30:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:30:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:30:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:30:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-19 17:30:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 39 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:30:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14831503837249592947.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 17:30:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability629548461677257832.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14831503837249592947.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability629548461677257832.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.10314,124084,19484,2660,215036,13799,604,340838,100,826193,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((EG((((((i5.i0.u3.n5_0>=1)&&(i5.i0.u3.s3_0>=1))||((i6.i1.u9.n5_4>=1)&&(i6.i1.u9.s3_4>=1)))||(((i8.i0.u8.n5_1>=1)&&(i8.i0.u8.s3_1>=1)...2542
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EX(((EG((((((i5.i0.u3.n5_0>=1)&&(i5.i0.u3.s3_0>=1))||((i6.i1.u9.n5_4>=1)&&(i6.i1.u9.s3_4>=1)))||(((...3713
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...406
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 245 transition count 116
Applied a total of 1 rules in 18 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:30:44] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 239 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 12 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 11 ms
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 104 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8948754365275754034.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 17:30:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1858124861162270516.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8948754365275754034.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1858124861162270516.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.13272,97136,2,129687,5,435091,6,0,1086,230138,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((E((E(!((((((malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(s2_2<1))&&((malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(s2_3<1)))&&(((malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(s2_4<1))&&((ma...2320
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E((E(!((((((malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(s2_2<1))&&((malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(s2_3<1)))&&(((maliciou...1775
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
[2022-05-19 17:31:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:31:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14763415029734107697.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14763415029734107697.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14763415029734107697.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14763415029734107697.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14763415029734107697.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:31:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:31:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:31:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 77 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:31:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 36 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:31:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10532571203403198681.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11973357920031354279.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10532571203403198681.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11973357920031354279.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.27393,133236,20295,2632,249320,15577,596,358200,100,829527,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((E((E(!((((((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i6.i1.u26.s2_2<1))&&((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i10.i0.u17.s2_3<1)))&&(((u0.malicious_r...3296
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E((E(!((((((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i6.i1.u26.s2_2<1))&&((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i10.i0...3954
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...385
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 677 edges and 245 vertex of which 237 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 236 /245 variables (removed 9) and now considering 113/116 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 236 cols
[2022-05-19 17:31:45] [INFO ] Computed 126 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 159 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 236 cols
[2022-05-19 17:31:45] [INFO ] Computed 126 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 203 ms returned [176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 363 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/245 places, 113/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 229 /229 variables (removed 0) and now considering 113/113 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 229/245 places, 113/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:31:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1026 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=400 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 96 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=454 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 250 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 )
Probabilistic random walk after 250 steps, saw 233 distinct states, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:31:45] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 144 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 323 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 90 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4842711098696662213.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 17:31:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17615675597291489858.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4842711098696662213.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17615675597291489858.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.06229,93076,2,123020,5,426503,6,0,1085,214962,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(A(((!((((((n3_0>=1)&&(s2_0>=1))||((n3_3>=1)&&(s2_3>=1)))||(((n3_4>=1)&&(s2_4>=1))||((n3_1>=1)&&(s2_1>=1))))||((((n3_2>=1)&&(s2_2>=1...1697
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(!((E(!(((EG((a2_0>=1)) * (((((n1_3>=1)&&(Sstart_3>=1))||((n1_1>=1)&&(Sstart_1>...10590
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
[2022-05-19 17:32:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-19 17:32:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:32:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9407136427200623030.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9407136427200623030.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9407136427200623030.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9407136427200623030.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9407136427200623030.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:32:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:32:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:32:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 68 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:32:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-19 17:32:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 42 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:32:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18005239977150198618.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:32:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18208837692696593965.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18005239977150198618.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18208837692696593965.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.08036,118952,25527,4079,176248,21163,580,332087,107,831847,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(A(((!((((((i5.u12.n3_0>=1)&&(i5.u28.s2_0>=1))||((i6.i1.u10.n3_3>=1)&&(i6.i1.u26.s2_3>=1)))||(((i4.i1.u11.n3_4>=1)&&(i4.i1.u23.s2_4>...2468
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(!((E(!(((EG((i8.u43.a2_0>=1)) * (((((i6.i1.u18.n1_3>=1)&&(i6.i1.u26.Sstart_3>=...16160
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t23...386
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 677 edges and 245 vertex of which 237 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 1 rules in 6 ms. Remains 236 /245 variables (removed 9) and now considering 113/116 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 236 cols
[2022-05-19 17:32:46] [INFO ] Computed 126 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:32:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 236 cols
[2022-05-19 17:32:46] [INFO ] Computed 126 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:32:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned [176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 261 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/245 places, 113/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 229 /229 variables (removed 0) and now considering 113/113 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 229/245 places, 113/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:32:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:32:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4356564963052401675.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 17:32:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17814642423643290494.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4356564963052401675.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17814642423643290494.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,823240,2.62693,88472,2,109742,5,394256,6,0,1019,188040,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 17:33:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-19 17:33:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:33:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8107043978284510429.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8107043978284510429.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8107043978284510429.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8107043978284510429.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8107043978284510429.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:33:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:33:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:33:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 62 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-19 17:33:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 56 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:33:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability675896621124447702.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 17:33:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11943299477191195130.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability675896621124447702.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11943299477191195130.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,823240,6.01761,211172,9703,3385,155082,17293,462,646132,117,2.78986e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((E(!((((((((u24.n8_7>=1)&&(u24.n8_8>=1))&&((u24.n8_9>=1)&&(u24.n8_10>=1)))&&(((u24.n8_11>=1)&&(u24.n8_12>=1))&&((u24.n8_13>=1)&&(u24.s...1401
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((((((((u24.n8_7>=1)&&(u24.n8_8>=1))&&((u24.n8_9>=1)&&(u24.n8_10>=1)))&&(((u24.n8_11>=1)&&(u24....1452
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t21, t31, t36, t37, t40, t46, t48...336
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 142 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 209 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 353 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 92 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17871170810697371957.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 17:33:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7843631635737544918.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17871170810697371957.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7843631635737544918.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.05045,93656,2,123020,5,426503,6,0,1085,214962,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 17:34:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:34:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:34:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8610729386441020518.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8610729386441020518.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8610729386441020518.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8610729386441020518.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8610729386441020518.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:34:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:34:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:34:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:34:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-19 17:34:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 36 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:34:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6737869944520256960.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 17:34:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8218260300550745652.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6737869944520256960.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8218260300550745652.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,4.15274,125796,18423,2660,217976,16950,582,344016,100,830136,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(A(!(((((i4.u15.n4_0>=1)&&(i1.i1.u10.n4_1>=1))&&((i5.i0.u11.n4_2>=1)&&(i9.i0.u12.n4_3>=1)))&&(((i2.i1.u13.n4_4>=1)&&(i6.u14.n4_5>=1))...611
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!((EG((i4.u43.a3_0>=1)) * !((((((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(u41.s6_6<1))&&((u0.malicious_r...1529
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...391
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:34:47] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-19 17:34:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:34:47] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:34:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 210 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 337 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2022-05-19 17:34:48] [INFO ] Computed 132 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 17:34:48] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 86 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:34:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:34:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:34:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:34:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:34:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:34:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2102326913481125854.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 17:34:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6690177164663565269.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2102326913481125854.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6690177164663565269.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.0933,93116,2,123020,5,426503,6,0,1085,214962,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 17:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 17:35:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph141326967293908733.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph141326967293908733.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph141326967293908733.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph141326967293908733.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph141326967293908733.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:35:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:35:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:35:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-19 17:35:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:35:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5241057816750682465.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 17:35:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6496341350688010313.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5241057816750682465.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6496341350688010313.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.23814,124168,17666,2633,211962,16648,577,341409,100,830382,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EF(AG(AX((i7.u43.a2_0>=1))))) U (((((i7.u13.n3_0>=1)&&(i7.u17.s2_0>=1))||((i9.i0.u12.n3_3>=1)&&(i9.i0.u23.s2_3>=1)))||(((i5.i1.u14.n3...367
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((((i7.u13.n3_0>=1)&&(i7.u17.s2_0>=1))||((i9.i0.u12.n3_3>=1)&&(i9.i0.u23.s2_3>=1)))||(((i5.i1....1092
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...391
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 677 edges and 245 vertex of which 237 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 1 rules in 7 ms. Remains 236 /245 variables (removed 9) and now considering 113/116 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 236 cols
[2022-05-19 17:35:48] [INFO ] Computed 126 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:35:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 236 cols
[2022-05-19 17:35:48] [INFO ] Computed 126 place invariants in 20 ms
[2022-05-19 17:35:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 200 ms returned [176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 338 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/245 places, 113/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 229 /229 variables (removed 0) and now considering 113/113 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 229/245 places, 113/116 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:35:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 17:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-19 17:35:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5835791386809354826.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 17:35:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6271232144915522683.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5835791386809354826.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6271232144915522683.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,823240,2.58739,88588,2,109742,5,394256,6,0,1019,188040,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 17:36:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-19 17:36:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:36:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2277566999502593247.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2277566999502593247.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2277566999502593247.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2277566999502593247.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2277566999502593247.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:36:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:36:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:36:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 62 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:36:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-19 17:36:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 56 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:36:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10476963365973892300.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 17:36:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13714112678538515817.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10476963365973892300.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13714112678538515817.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,823240,6.10393,209220,10543,3389,145158,17249,476,643642,121,2.78948e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(E((i8.u29.a2_0>=1) U !((((((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i8.u14.Sstart_0<1))&&((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i6.u15.Sstart_1<1)))&&...455
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(E((i8.u29.a2_0>=1) U !((((((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i8.u14.Sstart_0<1))&&((u0.malicious_rese...540
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t19, t28, t30, t38, t39, t40, t41, t43...337
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 17:36:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 17:36:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 17:36:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 17:36:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3277736999837884192.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3277736999837884192.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3277736999837884192.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3277736999837884192.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3277736999837884192.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 17:36:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 17:36:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 17:36:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 17:36:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-19 17:36:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 38 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-19 17:36:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10243631796603746944.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 17:36:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11727082933071236589.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10243631796603746944.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11727082933071236589.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27196e+06,3.0037,119956,16790,2630,195960,16647,562,332756,97,830381,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((i5.u44.a3_0<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(i5.u44.a3_0<1))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,22.2615,521216,1,0,854642,47903,2368,1.67721e+06,720,3.61576e+06,1474004
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EX(!(A(!(AF(EX((((((i5.u11.n3_0>=1)&&(i5.u25.s2_0>=1))||((i2.i1.u13.n3_3>=1)&&(i2.i1.u24.s2_3>=1)))||(((i6.i1.u14.n3_4>=1)&&(i6.i1.u31.s2...498
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(((((i2.i0.u8.s4_3>=1)||(i8.u34.s4_2>=1))||((i4.i1.u33.s4_1>=1)||(i5.u32.s4_0>=1)))||(((i7.i1...889
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...391
(forward)formula 1,1,40.9886,946520,1,0,2.05174e+06,63863,2986,2.68739e+06,944,3.65597e+06,3618042
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(((i5.u44.a3_0>=1) * (((i5.u45.a1_0<1) * ((A((i5.u44.a2_0>=1) U (i5.u43.a4_0<1)) + EG(((((i2.i0.u8.s4_3>=1)||(i8.u34.s4_2>=1))||((i4.i1...1575
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i5.u44.a3_0>=1)) * (i5.u45.a1_0<1)) * !(EG(!((i5.u43.a4_0<1))))) * !(E(!((i5.u43.a4_0...1961
(forward)formula 2,1,41.0337,949424,1,0,2.05207e+06,63863,3245,2.68767e+06,971,3.65597e+06,3646440
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG((EG((((EX(((((i5.u18.n2_0<1)||(i4.i0.u19.n2_1<1))||((i8.u26.n2_2<1)||(i2.i1.u20.n2_3<1)))||(((i6.i1.u27.n2_4<1)||(i3.i1.u21.n2_5<1))||...1382
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG((((EX(((((i5.u18.n2_0<1)||(i4.i0.u19.n2_1<1))||((i8.u26.n2_2<1)||(i2.i1.u20.n2_3<...2035
(forward)formula 3,0,56.4559,1100960,1,0,2.40055e+06,70488,3533,2.93535e+06,990,3.66358e+06,4455319
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (EX(((EG((((((i5.u2.n5_0>=1)&&(i5.u2.s3_0>=1))||((i6.i0.u9.n5_4>=1)&&(i6.i0.u9.s3_4>=1)))||(((i4.i1.u3.n5_1>=1)&&(i4.i1.u3.s3_1>=1))||((i...2540
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EX(((EG((((((i5.u2.n5_0>=1)&&(i5.u2.s3_0>=1))||((i6.i0.u9.n5_4>=1)&&(i6.i0.u9.s3_4>=1)))||(((i4.i1....3692
(forward)formula 4,0,76.5076,1239824,1,0,2.80107e+06,71053,3674,3.19682e+06,991,3.66461e+06,5193524
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG((E((E(!((((((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i8.u30.s2_2<1))&&((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i2.i1.u24.s2_3<1)))&&(((u0.malicious_reser...3317
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E((E(!((((((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i8.u30.s2_2<1))&&((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i2.i1.u24...3979
(forward)formula 5,1,114.799,1461516,1,0,3.38035e+06,71053,4111,3.49758e+06,1006,3.66561e+06,6428749
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG((!(A(((!((((((i5.u11.n3_0>=1)&&(i5.u25.s2_0>=1))||((i2.i1.u13.n3_3>=1)&&(i2.i1.u24.s2_3>=1)))||(((i6.i1.u14.n3_4>=1)&&(i6.i1.u31.s2_4>...2468
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(!((E(!(((EG((i5.u44.a2_0>=1)) * (((((i2.i1.u24.n1_3>=1)&&(i2.i1.u20.Sstart_3>=...16132
dead was empty
(forward)formula 6,0,145.653,1721532,1,0,4.09873e+06,71364,4282,3.93359e+06,1010,3.66635e+06,7554308
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((E(!((((((((u38.n8_7>=1)&&(u38.n8_8>=1))&&((u38.n8_9>=1)&&(u38.n8_10>=1)))&&(((u38.n8_11>=1)&&(u38.n8_12>=1))&&((u38.n8_13>=1)&&(i4.i1...1446
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((((((((u38.n8_7>=1)&&(u38.n8_8>=1))&&((u38.n8_9>=1)&&(u38.n8_10>=1)))&&(((u38.n8_11>=1)&&(u38....1497
(forward)formula 7,0,145.741,1725756,1,0,4.10181e+06,71364,4326,3.93614e+06,1010,3.66635e+06,7598026
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EX(A(A(!(((((i5.u11.n4_0>=1)&&(i4.i0.u12.n4_1>=1))&&((i8.u17.n4_2>=1)&&(i2.i1.u13.n4_3>=1)))&&(((i6.i1.u14.n4_4>=1)&&(i3.i1.u15.n4_5>=1))...613
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!((EG((i5.u44.a3_0>=1)) * !((((((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(u42.s6_6<1))&&((u0.malicious_r...1529
(forward)formula 8,0,154.075,1731300,1,0,4.11528e+06,71610,4370,3.95012e+06,1011,3.66688e+06,7621735
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(!(EF(AG(AX((i5.u44.a2_0>=1))))) U (((((i5.u11.n3_0>=1)&&(i5.u25.s2_0>=1))||((i2.i1.u13.n3_3>=1)&&(i2.i1.u24.s2_3>=1)))||(((i6.i1.u14.n3...361
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((((i5.u11.n3_0>=1)&&(i5.u25.s2_0>=1))||((i2.i1.u13.n3_3>=1)&&(i2.i1.u24.s2_3>=1)))||(((i6.i1....1074
(forward)formula 9,0,174.76,1788852,1,0,4.23541e+06,71611,4378,4.0454e+06,1011,3.66691e+06,7916723
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (AF(E((i5.u44.a2_0>=1) U !((((((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i5.u25.Sstart_0<1))&&((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i4.i0.u19.Sstart_1<1))...471
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(E((i5.u44.a2_0>=1) U !((((((u0.malicious_reservoir_0<1)||(i5.u25.Sstart_0<1))&&((u0.malicious_rese...556
(forward)formula 10,1,174.78,1789380,1,0,4.23634e+06,71611,4382,4.04609e+06,1011,3.66691e+06,7920617
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 964373 ms.

BK_STOP 1652981984250

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r168-tall-165277017300906"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06.tgz
mv QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;