Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r150-smll-165276998600258.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is ParamProductionCell-PT-1, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r150-smll-165276998600258
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 420K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K Apr 29 17:38 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K Apr 29 17:38 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K Apr 29 17:38 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K Apr 29 17:38 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 9 08:22 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 9 08:22 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K May 9 08:22 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 9 08:22 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K May 9 08:22 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 9 08:22 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 174K May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1653049514433

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-20 12:25:16] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-20 12:25:16] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-20 12:25:17] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 275 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:17] [INFO ] Transformed 231 places.
[2022-05-20 12:25:17] [INFO ] Transformed 202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:17] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-20 12:25:17] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 231 places and 202 transitions in 525 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 24 ms.
Support contains 133 out of 231 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 231/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 40 ms. Remains 231 /231 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 231 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:17] [INFO ] Computed 59 place invariants in 32 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 741 ms returned [15, 31, 47, 65, 73, 120, 164, 170, 196, 197, 201, 206]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 809 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 219/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 219 /219 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 219/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Support contains 133 out of 219 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 109 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
Support contains 132 out of 219 places (down from 133) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 965 ms. (steps per millisecond=10 ) properties (out of 73) seen :46
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 44 ms. (steps per millisecond=22 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 53 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 53 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 53 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 55 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 56 ms. (steps per millisecond=17 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 55 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 56 ms. (steps per millisecond=17 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 42 ms. (steps per millisecond=23 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 51 ms. (steps per millisecond=19 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=32 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 38 ms. (steps per millisecond=26 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 38 ms. (steps per millisecond=26 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 37 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 37 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 37 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 34 ms. (steps per millisecond=29 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 34 ms. (steps per millisecond=29 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 38 ms. (steps per millisecond=26 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 35 ms. (steps per millisecond=28 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 37 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 36 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 36 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 37 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 35 ms. (steps per millisecond=28 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 36 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 27 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 219 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:21] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 10 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 28 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2022-05-20 12:25:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 28 positive and 19 generalized place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2022-05-20 12:25:22] [INFO ] After 775ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :5 sat :0 real:22
[2022-05-20 12:25:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 28 positive place invariants in 17 ms returned sat
[2022-05-20 12:25:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 28 positive and 19 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2022-05-20 12:25:23] [INFO ] After 548ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :8 sat :19
[2022-05-20 12:25:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-20 12:25:23] [INFO ] After 785ms SMT Verify possible using 68 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :8 sat :19
[2022-05-20 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 201 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 173 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 146 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 137 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 151 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 135 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 132 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 133 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 141 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 112 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 131 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:25] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 11 trap constraints in 1956 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 118 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 178 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 91 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 103 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 520 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 132 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 132 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:27] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 2 trap constraints in 320 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 130 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:27] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 2 trap constraints in 255 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 89 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 93 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 85 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:27] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 5 trap constraints in 536 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 90 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 112 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 77 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 94 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] After 5289ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :26 sat :1
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 100 ms.
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] After 6373ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :26 sat :1
Fused 27 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 4 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 219 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 219 transition count 192
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 209 transition count 192
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 209 transition count 181
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 198 transition count 181
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 193 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 193 transition count 176
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 173 transition count 156
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 7 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 173 transition count 149
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 166 transition count 149
Applied a total of 106 rules in 88 ms. Remains 166 /219 variables (removed 53) and now considering 149/202 (removed 53) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 166/219 places, 149/202 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 36 ms. (steps per millisecond=277 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished Best-First random walk after 431 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 )
Successfully simplified 26 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
Support contains 58 out of 219 places (down from 65) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 213 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 213 transition count 196
Applied a total of 12 rules in 13 ms. Remains 213 /219 variables (removed 6) and now considering 196/202 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 213 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:28] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 18 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 403 ms returned [1, 15, 18, 23, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 56, 61, 73, 74, 93, 94, 96, 108, 109, 111, 113, 153, 155, 157, 180, 184, 189, 193, 204]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 407 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/219 places, 196/202 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 183 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 183 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 15 ms. Remains 183 /185 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 343 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 473 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 183/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 183/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6559708659891500405.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16253163802531495543.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6559708659891500405.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16253163802531495543.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.13509,7820,2,2661,5,13792,6,0,929,8785,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((((swivel==0)||(arm2_waiting_for_swivel_2==0))&&((press_stop==0)||(PU_in==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((((swivel==0)||(arm2_waiting_for_swivel_2==0))&&((press_stop==0)||(PU_in==0)))))))] !=...161
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,3.64265,83580,1,0,344,387329,378,213,4967,222689,489
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 213 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 213 transition count 196
Applied a total of 12 rules in 14 ms. Remains 213 /219 variables (removed 6) and now considering 196/202 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 213 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:33] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 239 ms returned [1, 15, 17, 18, 23, 33, 34, 39, 44, 56, 61, 73, 74, 93, 96, 108, 109, 111, 153, 157, 180, 184, 189, 193, 204]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 256 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 188/219 places, 196/202 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 186 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 186 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 186 /188 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 186 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:33] [INFO ] Computed 22 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 171 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 186 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:34] [INFO ] Computed 22 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-20 12:25:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 446 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 621 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 186/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 186/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1149749791920147916.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3139645541237557589.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1149749791920147916.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3139645541237557589.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.137782,7856,2,2812,5,13780,6,0,941,8568,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((((EX(A((PL_out==1) U (((arm1_pick_up_ext==1)&&(arm1_backward==1))&&(A1L_ret_run==1)))) * (table_stop_h==1)) * ((TU_in==1)&&(arm2_mag...363
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((EX(!((E(!((((arm1_pick_up_ext==1)&&(arm1_backward==1))&&(A1L_ret_run==1))) U (!((PL_out...1025
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,1.69362,54496,1,0,327,149514,387,198,5149,92209,472
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 213 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 213 transition count 196
Applied a total of 12 rules in 8 ms. Remains 213 /219 variables (removed 6) and now considering 196/202 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 213 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:36] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 244 ms returned [1, 15, 17, 18, 23, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 56, 61, 73, 74, 93, 94, 96, 108, 109, 111, 113, 153, 155, 157, 180, 184, 189, 193, 204]
Discarding 29 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 246 ms to find 29 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/219 places, 196/202 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 182 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 182 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 182 /184 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 182 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:36] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 182 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:36] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-20 12:25:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 382 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 557 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 182/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 182/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9356619226421207726.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3917243327913937610.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9356619226421207726.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3917243327913937610.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.181992,8268,2,2888,5,15249,6,0,925,9370,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * TRUE)] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.233417,8268,1,0,5,15249,7,0,1518,9370,1
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 213 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 213 transition count 196
Applied a total of 12 rules in 7 ms. Remains 213 /219 variables (removed 6) and now considering 196/202 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 213 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:37] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 371 ms returned [1, 15, 17, 18, 23, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 56, 61, 73, 74, 93, 94, 96, 109, 111, 113, 153, 155, 157, 180, 184, 189, 193, 204]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 376 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/219 places, 196/202 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 183 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 183 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 183 /185 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:37] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 187 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:38] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-20 12:25:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 453 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 649 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 183/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 183/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3969702636758426732.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2982623130046200417.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3969702636758426732.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2982623130046200417.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.213868,8128,2,2907,5,15322,6,0,929,9406,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(AF((((arm2_retract_ext==1)&&(arm2_forward==1))&&(A2U_ext_run==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(EG(!((((arm2_retract_ext==1)&&(arm2_forward==1))&&(A2U_ext_run==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,6.35842,165108,1,0,1124,1.01508e+06,381,517,5291,714329,1434
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 213 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 213 transition count 196
Applied a total of 12 rules in 5 ms. Remains 213 /219 variables (removed 6) and now considering 196/202 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 213 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:45] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 407 ms returned [1, 15, 17, 18, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 56, 61, 73, 74, 93, 94, 96, 108, 109, 111, 113, 153, 155, 157, 180, 184, 189, 193, 204]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 409 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/219 places, 196/202 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 183 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 183 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 183 /185 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:45] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 193 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:45] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-20 12:25:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 538 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 734 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 183/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 183/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11341564401182067917.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7726899475140400465.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11341564401182067917.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7726899475140400465.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.211913,8080,2,2787,5,14863,6,0,929,9172,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(AF(((press_upward!=1)||(forge_rs!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(EG(!(((press_upward!=1)||(forge_rs!=1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,1.96711,55236,1,0,310,145798,381,191,5270,94348,450
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 213 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 213 transition count 196
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 213 /219 variables (removed 6) and now considering 196/202 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 213 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:48] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 266 ms returned [1, 15, 17, 18, 23, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 56, 61, 73, 74, 93, 94, 96, 108, 109, 111, 113, 153, 155, 157, 180, 184, 189, 193, 204]
Discarding 29 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 268 ms to find 29 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/219 places, 196/202 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 182 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 182 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 182 /184 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 182 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:48] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 182 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:48] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-20 12:25:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 554 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 695 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 182/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 182/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14199207039153286432.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10444943376120335020.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14199207039153286432.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10444943376120335020.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.21127,8152,2,2888,5,15249,6,0,925,9370,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,2.01311,56372,1,0,250,151288,375,167,5236,111145,367
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 213 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 213 transition count 196
Applied a total of 12 rules in 5 ms. Remains 213 /219 variables (removed 6) and now considering 196/202 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 213 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:51] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 230 ms returned [1, 15, 17, 18, 23, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 73, 74, 93, 94, 96, 108, 109, 111, 113, 153, 155, 157, 180, 184, 204]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 236 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 188/219 places, 196/202 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 186 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 186 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 186 /188 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 186 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:51] [INFO ] Computed 22 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 185 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 186 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:51] [INFO ] Computed 22 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-20 12:25:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 562 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 750 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 186/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 186/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7085028081554318065.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16158763204979999358.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7085028081554318065.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16158763204979999358.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.217132,8144,2,2798,5,14639,6,0,941,9255,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((belt2_start==1)&&(DB_deliver_rs==1)) * (((EF(((swivel==1)&&(arm2_waiting_for_swivel_2==1))) + AX(AG((((crane_transport_height==1)&&...411
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((belt2_start==1)&&(DB_deliver_rs==1))),TRUE) * ((swivel==1)&&(arm2_waiting_for_swi...710
(forward)formula 0,1,0.305526,8524,1,0,8,14639,10,2,1717,9255,4
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 213 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 213 transition count 196
Applied a total of 12 rules in 7 ms. Remains 213 /219 variables (removed 6) and now considering 196/202 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 213 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:52] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 417 ms returned [1, 15, 17, 18, 23, 33, 39, 40, 44, 56, 61, 73, 74, 93, 94, 96, 108, 109, 111, 113, 153, 155, 157, 180, 184, 189, 193, 204]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 419 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/219 places, 196/202 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 183 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 183 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 183 /185 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:53] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 210 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:53] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-20 12:25:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 540 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 753 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 183/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 183/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8916099097681162059.gal : 15 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2131546363516780735.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8916099097681162059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2131546363516780735.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.208235,8244,2,2847,5,14912,6,0,929,9347,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(((ch_TA1_free==1)&&(table_ready_for_unloading==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(((ch_TA1_free==1)&&(table_ready_for_unloading==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,4.11385,113868,1,0,930,453431,379,753,4970,551806,955
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 213 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 213 transition count 196
Applied a total of 12 rules in 8 ms. Remains 213 /219 variables (removed 6) and now considering 196/202 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 213 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:58] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 267 ms returned [1, 15, 17, 18, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 56, 61, 73, 74, 93, 94, 96, 108, 109, 111, 113, 153, 155, 157, 180, 184, 189, 193, 204]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 269 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/219 places, 196/202 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 183 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 183 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 183 /185 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:58] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2022-05-20 12:25:58] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-20 12:25:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 569 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 694 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 183/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 183/219 places, 194/202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11338307048680139573.gal : 7 ms
[2022-05-20 12:25:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18435617291980756594.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11338307048680139573.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18435617291980756594.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.22204,8216,2,2787,5,14863,6,0,929,9172,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF((EF(((press_upward==1)&&(forge_rs==1))) + EX((arm1_having_swivel_2==1)))) U (((A1L_out==1) * AX(!(((crane_release_height==1)&&(CU_lo...268
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!((E(TRUE U ((press_upward==1)&&(forge_rs==1))) + EX((arm1_having_swivel_2==1))))))) * ((A1L_o...338
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,3.05946,78604,1,0,353,342472,377,217,4939,198069,499
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 219 transition count 194
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 211 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 208 transition count 191
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 208 transition count 180
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 197 transition count 180
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 191 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 191 transition count 174
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 173 transition count 156
Applied a total of 92 rules in 38 ms. Remains 173 /219 variables (removed 46) and now considering 156/202 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 173 cols
[2022-05-20 12:26:02] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 272 ms returned [2, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 28, 29, 32, 53, 60, 61, 67, 74, 75, 77, 89, 90, 91, 93, 113, 126, 127, 129, 148, 152, 156, 157, 165]
Discarding 29 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 274 ms to find 29 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 144/219 places, 156/202 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 144 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 135 transition count 146
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 134 transition count 146
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 134 transition count 137
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 125 transition count 137
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 123 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 123 transition count 135
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 91 transition count 103
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 90 transition count 102
Applied a total of 108 rules in 23 ms. Remains 90 /144 variables (removed 54) and now considering 102/156 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 90 cols
[2022-05-20 12:26:02] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 90 cols
[2022-05-20 12:26:02] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-20 12:26:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 279 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 420 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/219 places, 102/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 90/219 places, 102/202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:26:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:26:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5167766640851919403.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6160274889272284025.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5167766640851919403.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6160274889272284025.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1659,0.065133,5540,2,857,5,3423,6,0,465,2390,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!(((EG(!(((table_stop_h==1)&&(TU_in==1)))) * (ch_DC_free==1)) * (deposit_belt_occupied==1))) U EG(A((((table_top_pos==1)&&(table_upwar...285
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !((E(!(EG(!((E(!(((press_at_lower_pos==1)&&(PU_lower_run==1))) U (!((((table_top_pos==1)&&(table_u...948
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t12, t16, t54, t55, t56, t61, t70, t76, t79, t85, t91, t95, t96, t97, t100, t101, Inters...248
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.34584,38664,1,0,1028,219523,233,471,2908,162677,1339
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 219 transition count 195
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 212 transition count 193
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 210 transition count 193
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 210 transition count 178
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 195 transition count 178
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 189 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 189 transition count 172
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 166 transition count 149
Applied a total of 106 rules in 24 ms. Remains 166 /219 variables (removed 53) and now considering 149/202 (removed 53) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 149 rows 166 cols
[2022-05-20 12:26:04] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 268 ms returned [1, 2, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 28, 29, 32, 33, 36, 45, 48, 55, 56, 62, 68, 69, 71, 83, 84, 85, 87, 107, 120, 121, 123, 142, 146, 150, 158]
Discarding 33 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 271 ms to find 33 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/219 places, 149/202 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 133 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 120 transition count 136
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 120 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 113 transition count 129
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 111 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 111 transition count 127
Performed 36 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 75 transition count 91
Applied a total of 116 rules in 12 ms. Remains 75 /133 variables (removed 58) and now considering 91/149 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 75 cols
[2022-05-20 12:26:04] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 156 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 75 cols
[2022-05-20 12:26:05] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-20 12:26:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 275 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 436 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 75/219 places, 91/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 75/219 places, 91/202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15001760559940824037.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3553565888357209351.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15001760559940824037.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3553565888357209351.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,565,0.053024,5140,2,583,5,2374,6,0,394,1755,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((((crane_transport_height==1)&&(crane_lower==1))&&(CU_lower_run==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((((crane_transport_height==1)&&(crane_lower==1))&&(CU_lower_run==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t43, t44, t45, t48, t50, t52, t56, t62, t64, t69, t72, t78, t80, t84, t88, t89, t90, In...251
(forward)formula 0,0,0.271065,9804,1,0,140,17758,182,83,2413,11572,209
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 214 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 214 transition count 197
Applied a total of 10 rules in 15 ms. Remains 214 /219 variables (removed 5) and now considering 197/202 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 214 cols
[2022-05-20 12:26:05] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 410 ms returned [1, 15, 17, 18, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 56, 61, 73, 74, 93, 94, 108, 109, 111, 113, 154, 156, 158, 181, 185, 190]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 412 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 189/219 places, 197/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 189 /189 variables (removed 0) and now considering 197/197 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 189/219 places, 197/202 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2022-05-20 12:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5111036928817811295.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9400497482748099980.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5111036928817811295.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9400497482748099980.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.238838,8876,2,3247,5,16742,6,0,956,10561,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(AG((((crane_transport_height!=1)||(crane_lower!=1))||(CL_lower_run!=1)))) + (!(E(((crane_to_belt1==1)&&(CL_trans_rs==1)) U ((robot...225
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((crane_transport_height!=1)||(crane_lower!=1))||(CL_lower_run!=1)...418
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t80, t85, t89, t100, t108, t112, t...333
(forward)formula 0,0,3.81598,90728,1,0,368,406398,383,228,5146,224073,523
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2022-05-20 12:26:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-20 12:26:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Total runtime 53225 ms.

BK_STOP 1653049570184

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ParamProductionCell-PT-1"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ParamProductionCell-PT-1, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r150-smll-165276998600258"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ParamProductionCell-PT-1.tgz
mv ParamProductionCell-PT-1 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;