Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r150-smll-165276998300018.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is NeoElection-COL-4, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r150-smll-165276998300018
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 312K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K Apr 30 04:14 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K Apr 30 04:14 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K Apr 30 04:08 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Apr 30 04:08 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.4K May 9 08:20 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 9 08:20 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K May 9 08:20 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 9 08:20 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 9 08:20 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 9 08:20 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652908385530

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-18 21:13:08] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-18 21:13:08] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-18 21:13:08] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2022-05-18 21:13:09] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2022-05-18 21:13:10] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1665 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:10] [INFO ] Detected 6 constant HL places corresponding to 870 PT places.
[2022-05-18 21:13:10] [INFO ] Imported 18 HL places and 22 HL transitions for a total of 1830 PT places and 3990.0 transition bindings in 57 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 31 ms.
[2022-05-18 21:13:10] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 18 places and 22 transitions 98 arcs in 12 ms.
[2022-05-18 21:13:10] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 3 ms.
Computed a total of 14 stabilizing places and 8 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 56 edges and 18 vertex of which 15 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Remains 10 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 7 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 8 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Incomplete random walk after 10003 steps, including 333 resets, run finished after 134 ms. (steps per millisecond=74 ) properties (out of 8) seen :7
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 53 ms. (steps per millisecond=188 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 6 cols
[2022-05-18 21:13:10] [INFO ] Computed 1 place invariants in 9 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:10] [INFO ] After 170ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0
Fused 1 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 10 simplifications.
[2022-05-18 21:13:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:10] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-18 21:13:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :MT
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 3, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAI1 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 3, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 3, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAI2 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 3, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 4, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnnP1 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 4, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 3 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 4, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnnP2 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 4, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 3 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 1, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP1 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 1, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 4 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$s, $m, 2, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP1 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$s, $m, 2, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 5 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 1, $p]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP2 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 1, $p]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 5 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$s, $m, 2, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP2 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$s, $m, 2, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 5 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 1, $p]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP3 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 1, $p]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 5 subsets.
Arc [11:1*[$m, $s, 1, $p]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP4 : constants on arcs in [[11:1*[$m, $s, 1, $p]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 5 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$s, $m, 2, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP4 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$s, $m, 2, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 5 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 0, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAskP : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 0, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 6 subsets.
Domain [M(5), POS(4), M(5)] of place P_masterList breaks symmetries in sort M
Arc [15:1*[$m, (MOD (ADD $i 1) 4)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort POS
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :STAGE
Arc [16:1*[$m, 0]] contains constants of sort STAGE
Transition T_poll__iAmPrimary : constants on arcs in [[16:1*[$m, 0]]] introduces in STAGE(3) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
Arc [16:1*[$m, 1]] contains constants of sort STAGE
Transition T_poll__iAmPrimary : constants on arcs in [[16:1*[$m, 1]]] introduces in STAGE(3) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 3 subsets.
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :NEGSTEP
Arc [8:1*[$m, $r, 1]] contains constants of sort NEGSTEP
Transition T_poll__handleAI1 : constants on arcs in [[8:1*[$m, $r, 1]]] introduces in NEGSTEP(3) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
Arc [8:1*[$m, $r, 2]] contains constants of sort NEGSTEP
Transition T_poll__handleAI1 : constants on arcs in [[8:1*[$m, $r, 2]]] introduces in NEGSTEP(3) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 3 subsets.
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :BOOL
Arc [7:1*[$m, 0, $pm]] contains constants of sort BOOL
Transition T_poll__handleAI2 : constants on arcs in [[7:1*[$m, 0, $pm]]] introduces in BOOL(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 1830 places and 1984 transitions 11141 arcs in 147 ms.
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Unfolded 15 HLPN properties in 4 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1687 places in 11 ms
Reduce places removed 1703 places and 1857 transitions.
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 110 out of 122 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 127/127 transitions.
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 110 transition count 127
Applied a total of 12 rules in 15 ms. Remains 110 /122 variables (removed 12) and now considering 127/127 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 110 cols
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 24 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 147 ms returned []
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 110 cols
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 18 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 184 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 335 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 110 cols
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 243 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/122 places, 127/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 110/122 places, 127/127 transitions.
Support contains 110 out of 110 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-18 21:13:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
Finished random walk after 91 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 13 properties in 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=5 )
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
Computed a total of 110 stabilizing places and 127 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 110 transition count 127
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 101 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 101 transition count 101
Applied a total of 18 rules in 16 ms. Remains 101 /110 variables (removed 9) and now considering 101/127 (removed 26) transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 101 cols
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 180 ms returned [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 187 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/110 places, 101/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 88 /88 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 88/110 places, 101/127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9539743035246775320.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5536754621955229740.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9539743035246775320.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5536754621955229740.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25291e+11,1.37422,39060,2,10966,5,172675,6,0,443,160337,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(EF(AG(((((((((P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(P_network_495>=1))&&(P_poll__handlingMessage_3>=1))||(((P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(P_network_525>=...1488
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((((((((P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(P_network_495>=1))&&(P_poll__handlingMess...1553
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...330
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 21:13:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 21:13:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph814198722214193436.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph814198722214193436.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph814198722214193436.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph814198722214193436.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph814198722214193436.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 21:13:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 21:13:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 21:13:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:13:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 16 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-18 21:13:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5715338391634719202.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-18 21:13:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5009256908255318520.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5715338391634719202.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5009256908255318520.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25291e+11,1.64752,46632,1054,2227,68194,48823,192,85216,201,238621,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(EF(AG(((((((((u5.P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(u5.P_network_495>=1))&&(u5.P_poll__handlingMessage_3>=1))||(((u5.P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(u5....1731
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((((((((u5.P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(u5.P_network_495>=1))&&(u5.P_poll__han...1796
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t72, t75, t76, t78, t93, t96, u4.t4, u4.t5, u4.t6, u4.t23, u4.t24, u4.t25, u4.t30, u4.t3...440
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 4 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 102 transition count 123
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 102 transition count 119
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 98 transition count 119
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 89 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 89 transition count 93
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 89 transition count 92
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 88 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 87 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 86 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 85 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 84 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 83 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 82 transition count 89
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 82 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 79 transition count 86
Applied a total of 44 rules in 56 ms. Remains 79 /110 variables (removed 31) and now considering 86/127 (removed 41) transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 77 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 79 cols
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned [6, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 20]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 103 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/110 places, 86/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 86/86 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 72/110 places, 86/127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
Finished random walk after 13 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 )
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 101 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 101 transition count 101
Applied a total of 18 rules in 6 ms. Remains 101 /110 variables (removed 9) and now considering 101/127 (removed 26) transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 101 cols
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 102 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/110 places, 101/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 88 /88 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 88/110 places, 101/127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2346757031734560473.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-18 21:14:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2998936689438888623.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2346757031734560473.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2998936689438888623.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25291e+11,1.39614,39056,2,10966,5,172675,6,0,443,160337,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AX(EX(EF(((((((((P_masterState_20>=1)&&(P_network_390>=1))&&(P_poll__handlingMessage_2>=1))||(((P_masterState_10>=1)&&(P_network_210>...3801
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((P_masterState_20>=1)&&(P_network_390>=1))&&(P_poll__handlingMessage_2>=1)...6878
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...330
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 21:14:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 21:14:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 21:14:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3296808556151699134.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3296808556151699134.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3296808556151699134.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3296808556151699134.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3296808556151699134.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 21:14:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 21:14:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 21:14:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 20 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:14:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2022-05-18 21:14:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-18 21:14:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7869210022766356335.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-18 21:14:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability53995674941520926.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7869210022766356335.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability53995674941520926.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...251
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25291e+11,8.71923,193856,1276,2653,63740,80466,215,723028,192,2.61274e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AX(EX(EF(((((((((u7.P_masterState_20>=1)&&(u7.P_network_390>=1))&&(u7.P_poll__handlingMessage_2>=1))||(((u5.P_masterState_10>=1)&&(u5...4457
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((u7.P_masterState_20>=1)&&(u7.P_network_390>=1))&&(u7.P_poll__handlingMess...8128
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t39, t42, t45, t67, t76, t93, t96, u5.t22, u5.t29, u7.t4, u7.t5, u7.t6, u7.t23, u7.t24, u7.t2...461
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 101 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 101 transition count 101
Applied a total of 18 rules in 8 ms. Remains 101 /110 variables (removed 9) and now considering 101/127 (removed 26) transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:15:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 101 cols
[2022-05-18 21:15:13] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:15:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 128 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/110 places, 101/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 88 /88 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 88/110 places, 101/127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:15:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 21:15:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 21:15:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:15:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 21:15:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 21:15:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15305509947567007312.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:15:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability634245374681236147.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15305509947567007312.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability634245374681236147.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25291e+11,1.25776,39040,2,10966,5,172675,6,0,443,160337,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(EX(((((((((P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(P_network_495>=1))&&(P_poll__handlingMessage_3>=1))||(((P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(P_network_525>=1))&...1562
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(EX(((((((((P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(P_network_495>=1))&&(P_poll__handlingMessage_3>=1))||(((P_negot...1607
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...330
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 21:15:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 21:15:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 21:15:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph30553926273059732.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph30553926273059732.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph30553926273059732.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph30553926273059732.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph30553926273059732.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 21:15:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 21:15:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 21:15:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:15:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-18 21:15:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-18 21:15:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4219176375010080967.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-18 21:15:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7229632016445767494.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4219176375010080967.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7229632016445767494.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25291e+11,4.68016,112864,1187,2703,68614,82399,213,421654,198,1.15454e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(EX(((((((((i6.u6.P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(i6.u6.P_network_495>=1))&&(i6.u6.P_poll__handlingMessage_3>=1))||(((i6.u6.P_negotiation_52>=...1877
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(EX(((((((((i6.u6.P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(i6.u6.P_network_495>=1))&&(i6.u6.P_poll__handlingMessage_...1922
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t72, t75, t78, t79, t93, t96, u5.t4, u5.t5, u5.t6, u5.t23, u5.t24, u5.t25, u5.t30, u5.t3...461
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 96 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 96 transition count 82
Applied a total of 28 rules in 4 ms. Remains 96 /110 variables (removed 14) and now considering 82/127 (removed 45) transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:16:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-18 21:16:14] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 150 ms returned [11, 15, 19, 23]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 151 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/110 places, 82/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 92 /92 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 92/110 places, 82/127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:16:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:16:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11675697002174602782.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability369584462638473971.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11675697002174602782.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability369584462638473971.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46438e+10,1.52185,38252,2,11441,5,159751,6,0,428,174814,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((A(((((P_poll__pollEnd_2>=1)||(P_poll__pollEnd_3>=1))||((P_poll__pollEnd_1>=1)||(P_poll__pollEnd_4>=1)))&&((((((P_negotiation_51>=1)&&...885
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(EG(!(EX(!(FALSE))))) U (!(((((P_poll__pollEnd_2>=1)||(P_poll__pollEnd_3>=1))||...1013
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t5...276
(forward)formula 0,1,25.5163,603592,1,0,379,3.2321e+06,191,105,2914,3.69867e+06,367
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 110 /110 variables (removed 0) and now considering 127/127 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 110 cols
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 110 cols
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 18 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 219 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 110 cols
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 171 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 110/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14910985666431615386.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-18 21:16:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15081492243651306563.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14910985666431615386.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15081492243651306563.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91912e+11,2.05737,47488,2,13808,5,216900,6,0,545,206102,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((((E((((P_startNeg__broadcasting_7>=1)||(P_startNeg__broadcasting_11>=1))||((P_startNeg__broadcasting_15>=1)||(P_startNeg__broadca...7053
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((((E((((P_startNeg__broadcasting_7>=1)||(P_startNeg__broadcasting_11>=1))||((P_startNeg__br...7126
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...435
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 21:17:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 21:17:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 21:17:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13872421695926816029.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13872421695926816029.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13872421695926816029.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13872421695926816029.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13872421695926816029.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 21:17:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 21:17:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 21:17:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:17:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2022-05-18 21:17:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-18 21:17:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7123184040116129821.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:17:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16188182425183462467.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7123184040116129821.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16188182425183462467.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91912e+11,1.66511,50236,1834,4435,43256,48162,224,158298,248,378534,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((((E((((i4.u8.P_startNeg__broadcasting_7>=1)||(i5.u9.P_startNeg__broadcasting_11>=1))||((i3.u7.P_startNeg__broadcasting_15>=1)||(u...8509
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((((E((((i4.u8.P_startNeg__broadcasting_7>=1)||(i5.u9.P_startNeg__broadcasting_11>=1))||((i3...8582
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u10.t3, u10.t13, u10.t14, u10.t15, u10.t16, u10.t17, u10.t18, u10.t19, u10.t20, u10.t21, u10....749
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 110 /110 variables (removed 0) and now considering 127/127 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:17:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 110 cols
[2022-05-18 21:17:40] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:17:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned [10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 86 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 127/127 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 98/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:17:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 21:17:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 21:17:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:17:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 21:17:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-18 21:17:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4521717947332745762.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:17:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14500373083848964575.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4521717947332745762.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14500373083848964575.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91912e+11,1.84471,48584,2,12595,5,217304,6,0,509,207384,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(!(((((P_polling_1>=1)||(P_polling_4>=1))||((P_polling_2>=1)||(P_polling_3>=1))) + !((!((((P_poll__pollEnd_2>=1)||(P_poll__pollEnd_3>...5497
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!(((((P_polling_1>=1)||(P_polling_4>=1))||((P_polling_2>=1)||(P_polling_3>=1))) + !((!((((P_poll_...5548
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...435
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 21:18:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 21:18:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9310934416809263713.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9310934416809263713.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9310934416809263713.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9310934416809263713.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9310934416809263713.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 21:18:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 21:18:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 21:18:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:18:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 16 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-18 21:18:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15484868927169818323.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8949603718355019264.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15484868927169818323.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8949603718355019264.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91912e+11,4.32371,111808,2123,3046,68884,56485,259,659926,223,789181,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(!(((((i3.u5.P_polling_1>=1)||(i6.u4.P_polling_4>=1))||((i4.u6.P_polling_2>=1)||(i5.u7.P_polling_3>=1))) + !((!((((i4.u6.P_poll__poll...6733
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!(((((i3.u5.P_polling_1>=1)||(i6.u4.P_polling_4>=1))||((i4.u6.P_polling_2>=1)||(i5.u7.P_polling_3...6784
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i3.u5.t0, i3.u5.t22, i3.u5.t23, i3.u5.t24, i3.u5.t25, i3.u5.t26, i3.u5.t27, i3.u5.t28, i3.u5....771
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 92 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 92 transition count 78
Applied a total of 36 rules in 4 ms. Remains 92 /110 variables (removed 18) and now considering 78/127 (removed 49) transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:18:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 92 cols
[2022-05-18 21:18:41] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 146 ms returned [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 148 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/110 places, 78/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 76/110 places, 78/127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:18:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:18:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3943185973248671720.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8060353836233865034.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3943185973248671720.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8060353836233865034.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46438e+10,0.977637,23276,2,6390,5,90751,6,0,372,91185,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((P_electionInit_1>=1)||(P_electionInit_2>=1))||((P_electionInit_3>=1)||(P_electionInit_4>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * (((P_electionInit_1>=1)||(P_electionInit_2>=1))||((P_electionInit_3>=1)||(P_electionInit_4>=1))))] ...163
(forward)formula 0,1,0.984974,23276,1,0,8,90751,8,1,527,91185,2
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 92 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 92 transition count 78
Applied a total of 36 rules in 3 ms. Remains 92 /110 variables (removed 18) and now considering 78/127 (removed 49) transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:18:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 92 cols
[2022-05-18 21:18:42] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 134 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/110 places, 78/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 76/110 places, 78/127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:18:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:18:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6857993671413178638.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability265131594796094171.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6857993671413178638.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability265131594796094171.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46438e+10,0.867277,23456,2,6390,5,90751,6,0,372,91185,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t70, t71, t72...260
(forward)formula 0,1,13.7518,313712,1,0,346,1.60369e+06,175,83,2499,1.78267e+06,331
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 4 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 102 transition count 123
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 102 transition count 119
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 98 transition count 119
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 89 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 89 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 88 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 87 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 86 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 85 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 84 transition count 90
Applied a total of 35 rules in 28 ms. Remains 84 /110 variables (removed 26) and now considering 90/127 (removed 37) transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:18:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 84 cols
[2022-05-18 21:18:56] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned [6, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 20]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/110 places, 90/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 77 /77 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 77/110 places, 90/127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:18:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:18:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7457082634453725404.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:18:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8814782454081911832.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7457082634453725404.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8814782454081911832.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.47474e+10,0.626244,20172,2,6456,5,88390,6,0,386,71536,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((EF(AG(((((((P_network_665<1)||(P_poll__handlingMessage_4<1))&&((P_network_425<1)||(P_poll__handlingMessage_2<1)))&&(((P_network_2...2083
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((((((P_network_665<1)||(P_poll__handlingMessage_4<1))&&((P_network_425<...2146
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...320
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,19.1997,474236,1,0,355,2.93301e+06,206,108,3029,2.46952e+06,327
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 106 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 106 transition count 123
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 106 /110 variables (removed 4) and now considering 123/127 (removed 4) transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:19:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 114 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-18 21:19:15] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-18 21:19:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/110 places, 123/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 94 /94 variables (removed 0) and now considering 123/123 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 94/110 places, 123/127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:19:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-18 21:19:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-18 21:19:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 123 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:19:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-18 21:19:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-18 21:19:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7713426191859660655.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:19:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9528040644140423668.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7713426191859660655.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9528040644140423668.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91912e+11,1.23953,34676,2,10836,5,157750,6,0,489,132990,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((((((P_network_220>=1)&&(P_poll__handlingMessage_1>=1))||((P_network_670>=1)&&(P_poll__handlingMessage_4>=1)))||(((P_network_430>=1)&&...6648
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E((((((((((P_masterState_35>=1)&&(P_negotiation_52>=1))&&((P_network_585>=1)&&(P_poll__handling...18637
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...419
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 21:19:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-18 21:19:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 21:19:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9227372490707403178.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9227372490707403178.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9227372490707403178.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9227372490707403178.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9227372490707403178.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 21:19:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 21:19:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 21:19:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 19 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:19:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-18 21:19:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-18 21:19:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8877732986200144236.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:19:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4820758370445428530.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8877732986200144236.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4820758370445428530.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91912e+11,2.19654,69588,1111,2403,28677,42808,211,382607,231,559879,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((((((u9.P_network_220>=1)&&(i2.u7.P_poll__handlingMessage_1>=1))||((u9.P_network_670>=1)&&(i4.u8.P_poll__handlingMessage_4>=1)))||(((i...7981
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E((((((((((i6.u10.P_masterState_35>=1)&&(i6.u10.P_negotiation_52>=1))&&((i6.u10.P_network_585>=...22362
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t118, u9.t4, u9.t5, u9.t6, u9.t31, u9.t32, u9.t33, u9.t34, u9.t35, u9.t36, u9.t49, u9.t50, u9...684
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 21:20:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-18 21:20:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 21:20:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 21:20:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10645600044460954488.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10645600044460954488.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10645600044460954488.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10645600044460954488.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10645600044460954488.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 21:20:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 21:20:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 21:20:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 19 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:20:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2022-05-18 21:20:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-18 21:20:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13051073556223388442.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-18 21:20:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1732599945741250455.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13051073556223388442.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1732599945741250455.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91912e+11,11.3851,286140,1657,4187,82677,71955,240,2.1687e+06,250,2.17809e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(EF(AG(((((((((i5.u9.P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(i5.u9.P_network_495>=1))&&(i5.u9.P_poll__handlingMessage_3>=1))||(((i5.u9.P_negotiation_...1839
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((((((((i5.u9.P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(i5.u9.P_network_495>=1))&&(i5.u9.P_...1904
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i3.u7.t0, i3.u7.t22, i3.u7.t23, i3.u7.t24, i3.u7.t25, i3.u7.t26, i3.u7.t27, i3.u7.t28, i3.u7....782
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2022-05-18 21:24:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 21:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-18 21:24:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 21:24:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 21:24:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 257 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2022-05-18 21:24:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2022-05-18 21:24:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15660356756455288792.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-18 21:24:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16340222653176037484.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15660356756455288792.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16340222653176037484.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91912e+11,1.57404,56060,10566,16,138502,393,328,127514,22,308,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(EF(AG(((((((((MMNEGSTEP52.P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(MMMTM495.P_network_495>=1))&&(M3.P_poll__handlingMessage_3>=1))||(((MMNEGSTEP52.P_...1920
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((((((((MMNEGSTEP52.P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(MMMTM495.P_network_495>=1))&&...1985
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...447
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,74.3665,2507784,1,0,6.80808e+06,393,2844,7.34611e+06,87,308,14800391
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (EG(AX(EX(EF(((((((((MBOOLM20.P_masterState_20>=1)&&(MMMTM390.P_network_390>=1))&&(M2.P_poll__handlingMessage_2>=1))||(((MBOOLM10.P_maste...4791
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((MBOOLM20.P_masterState_20>=1)&&(MMMTM390.P_network_390>=1))&&(M2.P_poll__...8732
(forward)formula 1,0,207.752,2874080,1,0,7.149e+06,393,1839,1.11921e+07,62,308,5932562
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(E(EX(((((((((MMNEGSTEP52.P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(MMMTM495.P_network_495>=1))&&(M3.P_poll__handlingMessage_3>=1))||(((MMNEGSTEP52.P_nego...2006
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(EX(((((((((MMNEGSTEP52.P_negotiation_52>=1)&&(MMMTM495.P_network_495>=1))&&(M3.P_poll__handlingMe...2051
(forward)formula 2,1,212.42,2874080,1,0,7.149e+06,393,1893,1.11921e+07,62,308,6510271
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EG(EF(((((E((((MPOS7.P_startNeg__broadcasting_7>=1)||(MPOS11.P_startNeg__broadcasting_11>=1))||((MPOS15.P_startNeg__broadcasting_15>=1)||...9091
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((((E((((MPOS7.P_startNeg__broadcasting_7>=1)||(MPOS11.P_startNeg__broadcasting_11>=1))||((M...9164
(forward)formula 3,1,226.497,2874080,1,0,7.149e+06,393,2481,1.11921e+07,68,308,9179786
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(E(!(((((M1.P_polling_1>=1)||(M4.P_polling_4>=1))||((M2.P_polling_2>=1)||(M3.P_polling_3>=1))) + !((!((((M2.P_poll__pollEnd_2>=1)||(M3....7141
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!(((((M1.P_polling_1>=1)||(M4.P_polling_4>=1))||((M2.P_polling_2>=1)||(M3.P_polling_3>=1))) + !((...7192
(forward)formula 4,1,234.634,2874080,1,0,7.149e+06,393,2498,1.19796e+07,68,308,10323199
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-4-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(((((((MMMTM220.P_network_220>=1)&&(M1.P_poll__handlingMessage_1>=1))||((MMMTM670.P_network_670>=1)&&(M4.P_poll__handlingMessage_4>=1)))...8556
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E((((((((((MBOOLM35.P_masterState_35>=1)&&(MMNEGSTEP52.P_negotiation_52>=1))&&((MMMTM585.P_netw...20071
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
[2022-05-18 21:47:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 126 ms
[2022-05-18 21:47:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
[2022-05-18 21:47:03] [INFO ] Transformed 110 places.
[2022-05-18 21:47:03] [INFO ] Transformed 127 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2022-05-18 21:47:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16155987790044759298.gal : 6 ms
[2022-05-18 21:47:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10296880776541055543.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16155987790044759298.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10296880776541055543.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...321
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91912e+11,5.21337,106588,2,28978,5,613039,6,0,545,279245,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((((((P_network_220>=1)&&(P_poll__handlingMessage_1>=1))||((P_network_670>=1)&&(P_poll__handlingMessage_4>=1)))||(((P_network_430>=1)&&...6648
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E((((((((((P_masterState_35>=1)&&(P_negotiation_52>=1))&&((P_network_585>=1)&&(P_poll__handling...18637
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...435
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Total runtime 3378069 ms.

BK_STOP 1652911766584

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="NeoElection-COL-4"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is NeoElection-COL-4, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r150-smll-165276998300018"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/NeoElection-COL-4.tgz
mv NeoElection-COL-4 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;