Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r114-smll-165264477300138.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-09, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-smll-165264477300138
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 280K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K Apr 30 11:18 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K Apr 30 11:18 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K Apr 30 11:13 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K Apr 30 11:13 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 9 07:59 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 9 07:59 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 9 07:59 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 9 07:59 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 9 07:59 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 07:59 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652693988046

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-16 09:39:50] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-16 09:39:50] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-16 09:39:50] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 154 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:50] [INFO ] Transformed 157 places.
[2022-05-16 09:39:50] [INFO ] Transformed 327 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:39:50] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-16 09:39:50] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 157 places and 327 transitions in 356 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 21 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 26 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 26 transitions.
Support contains 95 out of 157 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 301/301 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 125 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 125 transition count 240
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 124 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 124 transition count 238
Applied a total of 66 rules in 54 ms. Remains 124 /157 variables (removed 33) and now considering 238/301 (removed 63) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:39:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 229 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 229 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 09:39:50] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 301 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:39:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 229 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 229 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 09:39:50] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:39:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 218 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 571 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:39:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 229 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 229 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 09:39:51] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 10 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 272 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/157 places, 238/301 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 124/157 places, 238/301 transitions.
Support contains 95 out of 124 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-16 09:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 238 transitions.
Support contains 94 out of 124 places (down from 95) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 593 resets, run finished after 962 ms. (steps per millisecond=10 ) properties (out of 92) seen :40
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 52) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 50) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 48) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 47) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 46) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 45) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 45 properties.
[2022-05-16 09:39:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 229 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 229 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 09:39:53] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 7 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:39:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 7 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:39:53] [INFO ] After 534ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:45
[2022-05-16 09:39:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 7 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:39:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 7 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:39:55] [INFO ] After 630ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :40
[2022-05-16 09:39:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:39:55] [INFO ] After 517ms SMT Verify possible using 1 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :40
[2022-05-16 09:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:55] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 109 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 123 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:56] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 246 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 93 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:56] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 119 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:56] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 2 trap constraints in 148 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 69 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:56] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 179 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:56] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 112 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 2 trap constraints in 164 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 77 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 90 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 237 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:39:58] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 284 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:58] [INFO ] After 3009ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :7 sat :38
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 493 ms.
[2022-05-16 09:39:58] [INFO ] After 4642ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :7 sat :38
Fused 45 Parikh solutions to 35 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 9 properties in 244 ms.
Support contains 40 out of 124 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 58 edges and 124 vertex of which 10 / 124 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 15 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Drop transitions removed 20 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 20 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 519 edges and 119 vertex of which 112 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 112 transition count 217
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 111 transition count 217
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 82 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 82 transition count 159
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 80 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 80 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 80 transition count 153
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 79 transition count 157
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 79 transition count 153
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 79 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 78 transition count 152
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 78 transition count 149
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 75 transition count 149
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 75 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 74 transition count 148
Applied a total of 84 rules in 78 ms. Remains 74 /124 variables (removed 50) and now considering 148/238 (removed 90) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 74/124 places, 148/238 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1032 resets, run finished after 545 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 ) properties (out of 29) seen :5
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 16 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 15 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 14 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 17 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 14 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 19 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 20 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 15 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 16 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 17 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 21 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 19 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 19 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 17 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 15 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 19 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 15 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 19 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 24 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 74 cols
[2022-05-16 09:39:59] [INFO ] Computed 8 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 09:39:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:39:59] [INFO ] After 136ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:24
[2022-05-16 09:39:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:40:00] [INFO ] After 256ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :24
[2022-05-16 09:40:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:40:00] [INFO ] After 192ms SMT Verify possible using 3 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :24
[2022-05-16 09:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 71 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:40:00] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 157 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:40:00] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 60 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:40:00] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 60 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 121 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 123 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] After 977ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :24
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 193 ms.
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] After 1641ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :24
Fused 24 Parikh solutions to 20 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 21 properties in 55 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 74 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 74/74 places, 148/148 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 74 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 73 transition count 147
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 73 transition count 144
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 68 transition count 144
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 49 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 49 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 49 transition count 104
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 44 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 44 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 44 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 43 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 43 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 42 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 42 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 42 transition count 81
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 41 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 40 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 40 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 40 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 39 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 39 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 38 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 38 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 38 transition count 66
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -27
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 34 transition count 93
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 34 transition count 90
Free-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 34 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 31 transition count 87
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 31 transition count 84
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 11 times.
Drop transitions removed 11 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 31 transition count 84
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 31 transition count 84
Applied a total of 115 rules in 66 ms. Remains 31 /74 variables (removed 43) and now considering 84/148 (removed 64) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 31/74 places, 84/148 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 885 resets, run finished after 102 ms. (steps per millisecond=98 ) properties (out of 3) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 509 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=769 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 31 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] After 64ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] After 34ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] After 12ms SMT Verify possible using 29 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] After 21ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 7 ms.
[2022-05-16 09:40:01] [INFO ] After 107ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 84/84 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 7 edges and 31 vertex of which 2 / 31 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 120 edges and 30 vertex of which 23 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 23 transition count 68
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 21 transition count 66
Applied a total of 20 rules in 10 ms. Remains 21 /31 variables (removed 10) and now considering 66/84 (removed 18) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 21/31 places, 66/84 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 3240 resets, run finished after 41 ms. (steps per millisecond=243 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 602 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=1000 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 568 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=37 )
Probabilistic random walk after 568 steps, saw 247 distinct states, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 ) properties seen :1
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 238 transitions.
Computed a total of 14 stabilizing places and 24 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 64 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 64 transition count 123
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 56 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 56 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 56 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 55 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 55 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 54 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 54 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 54 transition count 90
Applied a total of 152 rules in 14 ms. Remains 54 /124 variables (removed 70) and now considering 90/238 (removed 148) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 88 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/124 places, 90/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 54/124 places, 90/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability895269934673369249.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13263369560758146963.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability895269934673369249.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13263369560758146963.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,668502,0.108602,6872,2,1266,5,10956,6,0,300,8322,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p150==1) + (EG((p114==0)) * AX(EF(((p125==1)||(((p17==1)&&(p36==1))&&((p55==1)&&(p129==1)))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p150==1))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EG((p114==0))) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U ((p125==1)||((...215
(forward)formula 0,1,0.10961,7316,1,0,7,10956,8,1,303,8322,1
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 58 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 58 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 66 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 66 transition count 128
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 59 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 59 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 59 transition count 106
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 57 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 57 transition count 100
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 144 place count 55 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 55 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 55 transition count 90
Applied a total of 152 rules in 13 ms. Remains 55 /124 variables (removed 69) and now considering 90/238 (removed 148) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 55 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 55 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 55 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 80 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/124 places, 90/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 55/124 places, 90/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1981873346809238394.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10835714266788353223.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1981873346809238394.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10835714266788353223.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,876267,0.172417,8716,2,1700,5,17984,6,0,306,18762,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(EX(E((((p36==1)&&(p154==1))||(p47==1)) U (p156!=1)))) U EX(A(((p5!=1) + EX((p109==1))) U AX(EF(((p111==1)&&(p140==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,!(EX(E((((p36==1)&&(p154==1))||(p47==1)) U (p156!=1)))))) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U ((p111==1)&&(...318
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t23, t...282
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,1.51938,39544,1,0,271,202448,216,150,2288,182276,306
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 176 edges and 124 vertex of which 12 / 124 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 58 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 58 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 59 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 59 transition count 121
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 51 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 51 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 51 transition count 96
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 144 place count 49 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 49 transition count 90
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 47 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 47 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 47 transition count 80
Drop transitions removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 47 transition count 75
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 46 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 3 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 43 transition count 71
Applied a total of 166 rules in 31 ms. Remains 43 /124 variables (removed 81) and now considering 71/238 (removed 167) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 43 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 43 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 43 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 69 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/124 places, 71/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 43/124 places, 71/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
Finished random walk after 3179 steps, including 321 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=353 )
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 70 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 70 transition count 136
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 65 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 65 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 65 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 64 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 64 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 63 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 63 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 63 transition count 112
Applied a total of 131 rules in 9 ms. Remains 63 /124 variables (removed 61) and now considering 112/238 (removed 126) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 109 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 109 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 109 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 94 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/124 places, 112/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/124 places, 112/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 112 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14089888235353064800.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2328914825443210273.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14089888235353064800.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2328914825443210273.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.63807e+06,0.245035,10664,2,1753,5,23357,6,0,360,31479,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(AG(((p10==0)||(p48==0)))) + EG(((p125==1)||(p11==1)))) + (A(EX((p91==1)) U (p119==1)) + AF((AX((p5==1)) * (p92==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((Init * !((EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((p10==0)||(p48==0)))))) + EG(((p125==1)||(p11==1)))))) * !(!((E(!((p119==1)) ...257
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...398
(forward)formula 0,0,7.629,164044,1,0,453,928985,261,217,2775,973154,500
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 69 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 69 transition count 134
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 63 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 63 transition count 122
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 63 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 62 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 62 transition count 113
Applied a total of 130 rules in 5 ms. Remains 62 /124 variables (removed 62) and now considering 113/238 (removed 125) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 110 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 62 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 110 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 62 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:40:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 175 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:40:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 110 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 62 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:13] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 110 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/124 places, 113/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 62/124 places, 113/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5069455254185007409.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1779110933380657615.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5069455254185007409.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1779110933380657615.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.88059e+06,0.234137,10412,2,2086,5,22070,6,0,357,27245,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A((EG((p49==1)) + !(A((p13!=1) U E((p95==1) U (p117==1))))) U EF((((p17==1)&&(p36==1))&&((p55==1)&&(p125==1))))) U !((EX(EF((p52!=1))) ...175
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(E(TRUE U (((p17==1)&&(p36==1))&&((p55==1)&&(p125==1))))) U (!((EG((p49==1)) + !(!((E(!(E((p9...801
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...433
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,17.2445,344852,1,0,894,1.95348e+06,271,532,2706,2.26916e+06,893
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 137 edges and 124 vertex of which 12 / 124 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 64 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 64 transition count 129
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 57 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 57 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 57 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 56 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 56 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 55 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 55 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 55 transition count 98
Drop transitions removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 55 transition count 93
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 54 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 3 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 51 transition count 89
Applied a total of 147 rules in 27 ms. Remains 51 /124 variables (removed 73) and now considering 89/238 (removed 149) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 51 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 51 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 51 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 74 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/124 places, 89/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 51/124 places, 89/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6828006825951129957.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13906391236613663760.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6828006825951129957.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13906391236613663760.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,233068,0.11313,7404,2,928,5,11093,6,0,273,11897,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG((p95!=1)) * (AG(((p111!=1)||(p132!=1))) + (!(A((p21==1) U ((p17==1)&&(p154==1)))) * ((p40==1)||(p143==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG((p95!=1)) * (!(E(TRUE U !(((p111!=1)||(p132!=1))))) + (!(!((E(!(((p17==1)&&(p154==1))) U (!((p2...262
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...305
(forward)formula 0,0,4.70701,101780,1,0,534,603851,211,297,2054,579582,589
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 65 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 65 transition count 126
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 58 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 58 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 58 transition count 106
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 55 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 55 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 53 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 53 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 53 transition count 87
Applied a total of 154 rules in 4 ms. Remains 53 /124 variables (removed 71) and now considering 87/238 (removed 151) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 53 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 53 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 53 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 86 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/124 places, 87/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 53/124 places, 87/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17537845037529887729.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9069915844549095516.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17537845037529887729.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9069915844549095516.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,852210,0.063758,6248,2,825,5,7008,6,0,295,6489,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(AG(AF((p98==0)))) + (p100==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p98==0))))))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p100==1))] != FALS...157
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t...287
(forward)formula 0,1,0.437451,15080,1,0,217,55461,198,96,2160,41653,256
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 64 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 64 transition count 124
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 56 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 56 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 56 transition count 100
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 53 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 53 transition count 91
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 50 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 50 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 50 transition count 76
Applied a total of 165 rules in 5 ms. Remains 50 /124 variables (removed 74) and now considering 76/238 (removed 162) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 50 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 50 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 50 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 70 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/124 places, 76/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 50/124 places, 76/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5648441167108912096.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1272106453531761399.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5648441167108912096.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1272106453531761399.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,599976,0.257241,10524,2,2061,5,28053,6,0,272,19103,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((p3==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (p3==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, t39, t40, Intersection wi...237
(forward)formula 0,1,0.941984,22556,1,0,132,99174,169,65,1957,69074,163
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 70 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 70 transition count 135
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 63 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 63 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 63 transition count 116
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 61 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 61 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 60 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 60 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 60 transition count 106
Applied a total of 135 rules in 4 ms. Remains 60 /124 variables (removed 64) and now considering 106/238 (removed 132) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 80 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/124 places, 106/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 60/124 places, 106/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1323922549038721415.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7438353330464068785.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1323922549038721415.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7438353330464068785.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.16562e+06,0.761004,20208,2,3100,5,67234,6,0,339,64667,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E((((EF(((p54==1)||(((((p18==1)&&(p37==1))&&((p56==1)&&(p61==1)))&&(((p66==1)&&(p71==1))&&((p78==1)&&(p85==1))))&&((p112==1)&&(p149==1...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((((E(TRUE U ((p54==1)||(((((p18==1)&&(p37==1))&&((p56==1)&&(p61==1)))&&(((p66==1)&&(p71==1))&&((p...468
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t24, t...343
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,15.4432,295496,1,0,561,1.89708e+06,266,317,2726,1.66069e+06,645
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 71 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 71 transition count 138
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 66 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 66 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 66 transition count 123
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 65 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 65 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 64 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 64 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 64 transition count 116
Applied a total of 127 rules in 5 ms. Remains 64 /124 variables (removed 60) and now considering 116/238 (removed 122) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 113 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 64 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 113 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 64 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 113 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 64 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 104 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/124 places, 116/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 64/124 places, 116/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3039913774334573496.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14957762299632914300.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3039913774334573496.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14957762299632914300.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91018e+06,0.299912,11356,2,1889,5,26046,6,0,368,31350,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p13==1) + (((!(E((p120==1) U (p140==1))) * !(E(E((p74==1) U (p26==1)) U ((p3==1)||(p72==1))))) * ((p17==1)&&(p36==1))) * (((p55==1)&...254
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p13==1))] != FALSE + ([(((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((!(E((p120==1) U (p140==1))) * !(E(E((p74==...623
(forward)formula 0,1,0.303198,11796,1,0,7,26046,8,1,371,31350,1
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 69 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 69 transition count 134
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 63 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 63 transition count 122
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 63 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 62 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 62 transition count 114
Applied a total of 129 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /124 variables (removed 62) and now considering 114/238 (removed 124) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 111 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 62 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 111 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 62 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:40:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:40:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 111 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 62 cols
[2022-05-16 09:40:54] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 89 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/124 places, 114/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 62/124 places, 114/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:40:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7299016694559994456.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:40:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11916343787148651624.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7299016694559994456.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11916343787148651624.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59215e+06,0.171441,8892,2,1502,5,17319,6,0,358,20598,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((p75==1) * (((p41==0) + AX((p107==0))) + (AG((p144==0)) * AX((p125==0)))))) + E(EG(AF((E((p127==1) U (p99==1)) * (p46==1)))) U EF(((...221
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,((p75==1) * (((p41==0) + !(EX(!((p107==0))))) + (!(E(TRUE U !((p144==0)))) * !(EX(!((p125==0))))))))...398
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...374
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,8.91949,191176,1,0,591,1.11523e+06,290,330,2877,1.12411e+06,650
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 67 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 67 transition count 130
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 60 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 60 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 60 transition count 110
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 57 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 57 transition count 101
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 143 place count 54 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 54 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 54 transition count 87
Applied a total of 154 rules in 4 ms. Remains 54 /124 variables (removed 70) and now considering 87/238 (removed 151) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 76 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/124 places, 87/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 54/124 places, 87/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8308232500528315647.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12965298610992723109.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8308232500528315647.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12965298610992723109.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.30054e+06,0.506719,15820,2,3413,5,51491,6,0,299,38420,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(E(!(AX((p52==1))) U (p100==1))) + (!(A(EG((p82==1)) U (((p17==1)&&(p154==1))||(p59==1)))) * EX(AX(((p55==0)||(p154==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(!((E(!((((p17==1)&&(p154==1))||(p59==1))) U (!(EG((p82==1))) * !((((p17==1)&&(p15...307
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t20, t21, t22, t24, t25, t...292
(forward)formula 0,0,10.6195,226248,1,0,401,1.33488e+06,207,202,2142,1.32939e+06,454
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 64 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 64 transition count 124
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 57 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 57 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 57 transition count 101
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 55 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 55 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 53 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 53 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 53 transition count 85
Applied a total of 157 rules in 8 ms. Remains 53 /124 variables (removed 71) and now considering 85/238 (removed 153) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 53 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 53 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 53 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 87 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/124 places, 85/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 53/124 places, 85/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability807881146616078203.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5136904760129072791.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability807881146616078203.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5136904760129072791.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,616014,0.07506,6312,2,1031,5,8935,6,0,293,7428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(EX((p123==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(EX((p123==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t23, t...257
(forward)formula 0,0,0.600184,17964,1,0,157,70843,193,79,2129,54810,191
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 172 edges and 124 vertex of which 12 / 124 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 62 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 62 transition count 127
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 54 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 54 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 54 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 52 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 52 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 50 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 50 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 50 transition count 87
Drop transitions removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 50 transition count 82
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 49 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 3 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 46 transition count 78
Applied a total of 159 rules in 20 ms. Remains 46 /124 variables (removed 78) and now considering 78/238 (removed 160) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 70 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 70 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 70 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 67 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/124 places, 78/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 46/124 places, 78/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5615540206314756695.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18040165419933070022.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5615540206314756695.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18040165419933070022.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,313060,0.07522,6728,2,684,5,8811,6,0,248,8852,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((p8==1) * AF(E((p83==1) U (p4==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((p8==1) * !(EG(!(E((p83==1) U (p4==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t34, t35, t36, t37...265
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,2.81178,67920,1,0,435,381660,185,280,1911,425967,451
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 68 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 68 transition count 131
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 62 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 62 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 62 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 61 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 61 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 60 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 60 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 60 transition count 103
Applied a total of 139 rules in 5 ms. Remains 60 /124 variables (removed 64) and now considering 103/238 (removed 135) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 99 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 99 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 99 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 15 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 90 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/124 places, 103/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 60/124 places, 103/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6982409061655486541.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2709973558997049199.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6982409061655486541.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2709973558997049199.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25462e+06,0.264299,10652,2,1649,5,25754,6,0,336,24365,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((A(((p138==1)&&(p48==1)) U E((p55==1) U (p140==1))) * !(E((p22==1) U (p17==1))))) + !(A(AX(A(((p55==1)&&(p154==1)) U (p21==1))) U AG(...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(!((E(!(E((p55==1) U (p140==1))) U (!(((p138==1)&&(p48==1))) * !(E((p55==1) U (p140==1))))) + EG(!(E...562
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...323
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,11.2188,224944,1,0,683,1.32024e+06,263,415,2676,1.33433e+06,784
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 238/238 transitions.
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 72 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 72 transition count 138
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 68 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 68 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 68 transition count 128
Applied a total of 114 rules in 3 ms. Remains 68 /124 variables (removed 56) and now considering 128/238 (removed 110) transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 68 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:29] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2022-05-16 09:41:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 68 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:29] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 09:41:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:41:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 68 cols
[2022-05-16 09:41:29] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:29] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 96 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/124 places, 128/238 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 68/124 places, 128/238 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:41:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15516124890137721886.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13887082613714162350.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15516124890137721886.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13887082613714162350.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.6257e+06,0.382709,12492,2,2645,5,30538,6,0,391,35688,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((((AF((p119==1)) + AX(AG(((p36==1)&&(p154==1))))) * (AG((p27==1)) + EX((p126==1)))) * (((p40==1) + AF((p139==1))) * (((((p111==1)&&(p...421
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY((FwdU(Init,!((((!(EG(!((p119==1)))) + !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p36==1)&&(p154==1))))))))) * (!(E(TRUE U ...1168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...349
(forward)formula 0,0,1.49282,32228,1,0,216,138190,283,96,2898,101508,266
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2022-05-16 09:41:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 09:41:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Total runtime 101541 ms.

BK_STOP 1652694091700

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-09"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-09, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-smll-165264477300138"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-09.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-09 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;