About the Execution of ITS-Tools for DoubleExponent-PT-002
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
390.668 | 41635.00 | 61700.00 | 668.70 | FFFFFTTTTFTFTFTF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r078-tall-165260109900170.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is DoubleExponent-PT-002, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r078-tall-165260109900170
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 260K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K Apr 29 13:48 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K Apr 29 13:48 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K Apr 29 13:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K Apr 29 13:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 07:41 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 9 07:41 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 9 07:41 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 9 07:41 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 9 07:41 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 07:41 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K May 10 09:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1652638192976
Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 68 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Transformed 110 places.
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Transformed 98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 110 places and 98 transitions in 164 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 79 out of 110 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 98/98 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 106 transition count 98
Applied a total of 4 rules in 13 ms. Remains 106 /110 variables (removed 4) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 15 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 300 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 87 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/110 places, 98/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 106/110 places, 98/98 transitions.
Support contains 79 out of 106 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 335 resets, run finished after 618 ms. (steps per millisecond=16 ) properties (out of 71) seen :29
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 34 ms. (steps per millisecond=29 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 26 resets, run finished after 39 ms. (steps per millisecond=25 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 25 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 25 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=31 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 25 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 26 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 31 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 31 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 42 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:09:56] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] After 135ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :6 sat :11 real:25
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 50 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] After 309ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :6 sat :10 real:26
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 63 ms.
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] After 930ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :6 sat :10 real:26
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] After 198ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :11 sat :31
[2022-05-15 18:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 18:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 18:09:58] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 88 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:58] [INFO ] After 598ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :11 sat :31
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 166 ms.
[2022-05-15 18:09:58] [INFO ] After 972ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :11 sat :31
Fused 42 Parikh solutions to 30 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 350 ms.
Support contains 41 out of 106 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 106 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 103 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 101 transition count 93
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 101 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 98 transition count 90
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 88 transition count 80
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 87 transition count 80
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 5 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 87 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 82 transition count 75
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 82 transition count 75
Applied a total of 50 rules in 25 ms. Remains 82 /106 variables (removed 24) and now considering 75/98 (removed 23) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 82/106 places, 75/98 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 726 resets, run finished after 278 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 ) properties (out of 31) seen :11
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 63 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 20) seen :7
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 61 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 60 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 59 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 13 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 82 cols
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 41ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :4 real:9
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 22ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 real:10
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 42ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 real:10
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 12 ms.
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 165ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 real:10
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 71ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :13
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 55ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :13
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 147ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :13
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 54 ms.
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 340ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :13
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 183 ms.
Support contains 17 out of 82 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 82/82 places, 75/75 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 82 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 66
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 71 transition count 64
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 65 transition count 58
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 65 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 64 transition count 57
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 64 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 61 transition count 54
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 61 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 60 transition count 53
Applied a total of 44 rules in 15 ms. Remains 60 /82 variables (removed 22) and now considering 53/75 (removed 22) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 60/82 places, 53/75 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1053 resets, run finished after 226 ms. (steps per millisecond=44 ) properties (out of 13) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 729 resets, run finished after 155 ms. (steps per millisecond=64 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 730 resets, run finished after 157 ms. (steps per millisecond=63 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 710 resets, run finished after 184 ms. (steps per millisecond=54 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 730 resets, run finished after 146 ms. (steps per millisecond=68 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 706 resets, run finished after 169 ms. (steps per millisecond=59 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 736 resets, run finished after 155 ms. (steps per millisecond=64 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 730 resets, run finished after 165 ms. (steps per millisecond=60 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 737 resets, run finished after 154 ms. (steps per millisecond=64 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 723 resets, run finished after 162 ms. (steps per millisecond=61 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 729 resets, run finished after 148 ms. (steps per millisecond=67 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 719 resets, run finished after 169 ms. (steps per millisecond=59 ) properties (out of 12) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 752 resets, run finished after 150 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 11 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 22ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 real:8
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 15ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:11
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 105ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:11
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 54ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :11
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 54ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :11
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 109ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :11
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 34 ms.
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 265ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :11
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 116 ms.
Support contains 14 out of 60 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 53/53 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 59 transition count 52
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 59 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 58 transition count 51
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 58 transition count 51
Applied a total of 6 rules in 8 ms. Remains 58 /60 variables (removed 2) and now considering 51/53 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 58/60 places, 51/53 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1119 resets, run finished after 192 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 754 resets, run finished after 132 ms. (steps per millisecond=75 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 769 resets, run finished after 130 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 756 resets, run finished after 135 ms. (steps per millisecond=74 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 732 resets, run finished after 127 ms. (steps per millisecond=78 ) properties (out of 11) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 766 resets, run finished after 123 ms. (steps per millisecond=81 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 756 resets, run finished after 119 ms. (steps per millisecond=84 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 735 resets, run finished after 127 ms. (steps per millisecond=78 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 759 resets, run finished after 123 ms. (steps per millisecond=81 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 746 resets, run finished after 122 ms. (steps per millisecond=81 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 778 resets, run finished after 120 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 2616 steps, run visited all 10 properties in 52 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 )
Probabilistic random walk after 2616 steps, saw 1334 distinct states, run finished after 52 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties seen :10
Successfully simplified 11 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 106 places (down from 70) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 173 edges and 106 vertex of which 104 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 154 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10595494014149785996.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7555782759373133839.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10595494014149785996.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7555782759373133839.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.111369,9128,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(EF(AG(((p29>=1)||((p13>=1)&&(p34>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((p29>=1)||((p13>=1)&&(p34>=1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,0,1.02294,44788,1,0,179,129193,216,101,3049,78887,205
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 105 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 83 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 74
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 78 transition count 70
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 64 transition count 56
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 64 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 63 transition count 55
Applied a total of 84 rules in 22 ms. Remains 63 /106 variables (removed 43) and now considering 55/98 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [42]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/106 places, 55/98 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 147 edges and 62 vertex of which 61 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 60 transition count 53
Applied a total of 3 rules in 6 ms. Remains 60 /62 variables (removed 2) and now considering 53/55 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 60/106 places, 53/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 60/106 places, 53/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8252982744177238933.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17969181338590414732.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8252982744177238933.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17969181338590414732.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2208,0.057318,6792,2,1255,5,9160,6,0,296,9265,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EG((((p69>=1)&&(p84>=1))||(p39>=1))) * (p107>=1)) * (p95>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EG((((p69>=1)&&(p84>=1))||(p39>=1))) * (p107>=1)) * (p95>=1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t3, t6, t12, t14, t19, t21, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t31, t33, t35, t39, t42, t43, t5...256
(forward)formula 0,0,0.419516,23256,1,0,592,80855,130,57,1895,73583,584
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [73]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 105/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7469957606486298020.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18001775795072630301.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7469957606486298020.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18001775795072630301.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.07517,7612,2,3218,5,12616,6,0,520,10444,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG((p47<1)) * E(AF(((EG(((p57>=1)&&(p81>=1))) + ((p71>=1)&&(p96>=1))) + (p86>=1))) U !((!(A(((p104>=1)&&(p30>=1)) U (p98>=1))) + EF((...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU((EY(Init) * EG((p47<1))),!(EG(!(((EG(((p57>=1)&&(p81>=1))) + ((p71>=1)&&(p96>=1))) + (p86>=1)))))) * !(...283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t17, t23, t30, t36, t43, t46, t53, t57, t58, t63, t66, t69, t70, t76, t82, t83, t86,...269
(forward)formula 0,0,3.24531,120492,1,0,1619,658388,245,439,3163,526532,1722
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16114190298026377485.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11958524465832722168.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16114190298026377485.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11958524465832722168.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.103003,9400,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EF(EX(((p56>=1)&&(p75>=1))))) U EX(EF(AG((p79>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p79>=1)))))))))) * !(E(!(EX(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p79>=1))))))) U (!...252
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,0,2.37902,92332,1,0,1158,383578,219,153,3102,291809,1217
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 9 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2114646772611223149.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2888436897783961730.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2114646772611223149.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2888436897783961730.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.103902,9256,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.107696,9256,1,0,7,18582,7,1,663,16252,2
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1601139828077730293.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5761744407771729088.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1601139828077730293.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5761744407771729088.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.1037,9348,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((p2>=1) + (AX(E((p20>=1) U (p27>=1))) * EF(EG(((p24>=1)&&(p49>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * (p2>=1))] != FALSE + [FwdG(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(EX(!(E((p20>=1) U (p27>=1)))))),TRUE),((p24>=1)&&(p4...173
(forward)formula 0,1,0.107278,9724,1,0,6,18582,8,0,660,16252,2
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12202302816129273210.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5840633487759034016.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12202302816129273210.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5840633487759034016.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.102685,9464,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((AG(((p22<1)||(p37<1))) + A(AG((p4>=1)) U EX((p80>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((p22<1)||(p37<1))))) + !((E(!(EX((p80>=1))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !((p4>=1))))) * !(E...208
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,1,3.24123,124080,1,0,1350,578411,228,331,3258,493747,1391
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14497032984844945256.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4478754492682214593.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14497032984844945256.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4478754492682214593.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.112523,9228,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF((AF(AX(((p40>=1)&&(p8>=1)))) * EX(TRUE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((p40>=1)&&(p8>=1)))))))) * EX(TRUE))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,1,1.88024,77436,1,0,1066,264188,219,107,2973,229776,1093
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 23 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 23 transitions
Performed 23 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 23
Iterating post reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 105 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 74
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 78 transition count 70
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 63 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 62 transition count 54
Applied a total of 85 rules in 13 ms. Remains 62 /106 variables (removed 44) and now considering 54/98 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 62 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [40, 41]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 37 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/106 places, 54/98 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 142 edges and 60 vertex of which 59 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 59 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 58 transition count 52
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 56 transition count 50
Applied a total of 7 rules in 7 ms. Remains 56 /60 variables (removed 4) and now considering 50/54 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 56 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 56 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 56/106 places, 50/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 56/106 places, 50/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1788372003670938802.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15185503662741881934.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1788372003670938802.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15185503662741881934.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2182,0.038797,6200,2,1407,5,6831,6,0,277,6056,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p53<1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p53<1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 48/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.302166,17992,1,0,456,63208,18,4,1436,47447,453
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9562288624182784728.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16885257783696364969.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9562288624182784728.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16885257783696364969.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.111616,9336,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AG((((p107>=1)&&(p95>=1))&&(p23<1))) + E(!(((p10>=1)&&(p28>=1))) U EF((p1>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p107>=1)&&(p95>=1))&&(p23<1))))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(FwdU(EY(Init),!(((p10>=1)&&(p...192
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 89/0/8
(forward)formula 0,0,1.09343,47204,1,0,181,135765,226,101,3356,90070,211
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 106 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 86 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 84 transition count 76
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 84 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 80 transition count 72
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 65 transition count 57
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 65 transition count 57
Applied a total of 84 rules in 16 ms. Remains 65 /106 variables (removed 41) and now considering 57/98 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 65 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [43, 44]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/106 places, 57/98 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 150 edges and 63 vertex of which 62 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 62 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 61 transition count 55
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 59 transition count 53
Applied a total of 7 rules in 5 ms. Remains 59 /63 variables (removed 4) and now considering 53/57 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 59 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 59 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 59/106 places, 53/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 59/106 places, 53/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2158821713728382488.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16364567433877488588.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2158821713728382488.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16364567433877488588.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2215,0.038622,5928,2,1688,5,6537,6,0,291,5359,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AG((AF((p44<1)) * EG((p44<1)))) + ((p8>=1)&&(p97>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((p44<1)))) * EG((p44<1)))))) + ((p8>=1)&&(p97>=1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t3, t6, t13, t18, t20, t23, t24, t26, t28, t30, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t46, t51, t5...256
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,0.721704,35696,1,0,684,166707,137,131,1899,143035,697
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15651178878963781484.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability572066057397796799.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15651178878963781484.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability572066057397796799.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.112242,9336,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(AG(EF((p3>=1)))) U AX(!(AF(((p27<1)||(((p68>=1)&&(p58>=1))&&(p90>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p3>=1))))))) * !(EX(!(!(!(EG(!(((p27<1)||(((p68>=1)&&(p58>=1))&&(p90>=1)))...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,0,2.00951,80020,1,0,1066,277385,226,107,3115,238401,1103
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12433771850327555800.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9568492791815154330.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12433771850327555800.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9568492791815154330.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.109164,9320,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(!(A(EX((p35<1)) U EF(((p91>=1)||(p53>=1)))))) + EG(!(A(AX(((p12>=1)&&(p50>=1))) U ((EX((p82>=1)) + AX((p102>=1))) + (p74>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U ((p91>=1)||(p53>=1))))) * !(EX((p35<1)))) * !(E(TRUE U ((p91>=1)||(p53>=1))...479
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,1,1.26502,55352,1,0,226,209146,220,128,3105,130166,261
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4004883867672289928.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4045033401790176203.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4004883867672289928.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4045033401790176203.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.105233,9396,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((EX(A(!(((p62>=1)||(p26>=1))) U EX((p62>=1)))) + AX((p20<1))) + (E(A((p47>=1) U (p47>=1)) U AF((p74>=1))) + EG(EX(((p86>=1)||(p20>=1))...388
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,((EX(!((E(!(EX((p62>=1))) U (!(!(((p62>=1)||(p26>=1)))) * !(EX((p62>=1))))) + EG(!(EX((p62>=1))))...1027
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,0,3.62433,114568,1,0,1217,550322,236,195,2989,450673,1275
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:28] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:28] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4458566629731341070.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability591706660983127991.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4458566629731341070.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability591706660983127991.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.102811,9444,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EG(!(E((((p22>=1)&&(p37>=1))||(p35>=1)) U ((p20>=1)||(p35>=1))))) + EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(TRUE))) * !(EG(!(E((((p22>=1)&&(p37>=1))||(p35>=1)) U ((p20>=1)||(p35>=1)))))))] = FAL...157
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,1,3.35397,114552,1,0,1216,540716,219,215,2975,458660,1232
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 104 /104 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5348455183898580987.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12473570416416582774.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5348455183898580987.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12473570416416582774.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.07981,8064,2,3449,5,13293,6,0,515,10922,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(EX(EF((p47>=1)))) + E((p25<1) U EG((p76>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((p25<1) U EG((p76>=1))))) * !(E(TRUE U EX(E(TRUE U (p47>=1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t17, t23, t30, t36, t43, t46, t53, t57, t58, t63, t66, t69, t70, t76, t82, t83, t86,...269
(forward)formula 0,0,1.86742,71740,1,0,1112,280576,227,130,3123,220183,1155
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
[2022-05-15 18:10:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Total runtime 40434 ms.
BK_STOP 1652638234611
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DoubleExponent-PT-002"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DoubleExponent-PT-002, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r078-tall-165260109900170"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DoubleExponent-PT-002.tgz
mv DoubleExponent-PT-002 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;