About the Execution of ITS-Tools for Dekker-PT-020
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB)  | 
      Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status  | 
   
| 619.523 | 24354.00 | 48254.00 | 728.70 | FTFFFTFFTTTTFFTF | normal | 
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r060-tall-165254772300609.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
 Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
    Executing tool itstools
    Input is Dekker-PT-020, examination is CTLCardinality
    Time confinement is 3600 seconds
    Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
    Number of cores is 4
    Run identifier is r060-tall-165254772300609
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 484K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K Apr 30 05:18 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users  83K Apr 30 05:18 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K Apr 30 05:16 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users  47K Apr 30 05:16 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May  9 07:36 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users  28K May  9 07:36 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May  9 07:36 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users  16K May  9 07:36 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May  9 07:36 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May  9 07:36 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users    6 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users    4 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users    6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 247K May 10 09:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1652631253052
Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-15 16:14:14] [INFO   ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600] 
[2022-05-15 16:14:14] [INFO   ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml 
[2022-05-15 16:14:14] [INFO   ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 137 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:14] [INFO   ] Transformed 100 places. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:14] [INFO   ] Transformed 440 transitions. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:14] [INFO   ] Found NUPN structural information; 
[2022-05-15 16:14:14] [INFO   ] Parsed PT model containing 100 places and 440 transitions in 244 ms. 
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 20 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 84 out of 100 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:14] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 100 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:14] [INFO   ] Computed 60 place invariants in 13 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:14] [INFO   ] Implicit Places using invariants in 213 ms returned [43, 46, 70, 97] 
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 241 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 96/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Support contains 84 out of 96 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:15] [INFO   ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:15] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 72 ms 
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-15 16:14:15] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:15] [INFO   ] Input system was already deterministic with 440 transitions. 
Support contains 83 out of 96 places (down from 84) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 571 ms. (steps per millisecond=17 ) properties (out of 79) seen :41
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 38) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 37) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 36) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 35) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 35) seen :1
Running SMT prover for 34 properties.
[2022-05-15 16:14:15] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:15] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 7 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  40 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  40 positive and 16 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] After 100ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :23 sat :3 real:8 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] After 22ms SMT Verify possible using 20 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :23 sat :0 real:11 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] After 252ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :23 sat :0 real:11 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  40 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  40 positive and 16 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] After 82ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :23 sat :11 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] After 60ms SMT Verify possible using 20 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :23 sat :11 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:16] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:17] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:17] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 575 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:17] [INFO   ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 17/16 trap constraints in 1121 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:17] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:17] [INFO   ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 35 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:17] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:17] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:17] [INFO   ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 74 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:17] [INFO   ] After 1384ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :23 sat :11 
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 53 ms.
[2022-05-15 16:14:17] [INFO   ] After 1629ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :23 sat :11 
Fused 34 Parikh solutions to 4 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5 ms.
Support contains 20 out of 96 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 32 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 299 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=500 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=526 ) properties (out of 11) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=526 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=555 ) properties (out of 10) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=500 ) properties (out of 8) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=312 ) properties (out of 8) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=500 ) properties (out of 8) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=434 ) properties (out of 7) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=434 ) properties (out of 7) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=454 ) properties (out of 7) seen :1
Running SMT prover for 6 properties.
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 2 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  40 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  40 positive and 16 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] After 51ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2 real:4 
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] After 13ms SMT Verify possible using 20 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:6 
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] After 130ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:6 
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  40 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  40 positive and 16 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] After 43ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6 
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] After 52ms SMT Verify possible using 20 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6 
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] After 116ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6 
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 32 ms.
[2022-05-15 16:14:18] [INFO   ] After 246ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6 
Fused 6 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 96 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 39 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 258 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=384 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=416 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=500 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=526 ) properties (out of 6) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=500 ) properties (out of 5) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=500 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 4 properties.
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 4 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  40 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  40 positive and 16 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] After 41ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] After 8ms SMT Verify possible using 20 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] After 16ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:3 
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 6 ms.
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] After 123ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  40 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  40 positive and 16 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] After 34ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] After 19ms SMT Verify possible using 20 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:19] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Trap strengthening procedure interrupted after too many repetitions 757 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 22/21 trap constraints in 758 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 130 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] After 940ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4 
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 20 ms.
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] After 1044ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4 
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 96 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 24 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 225 ms. (steps per millisecond=44 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=588 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=714 ) properties (out of 4) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=666 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=666 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 3 properties.
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 1 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  40 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  40 positive and 16 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] After 82ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  40 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  40 positive and 16 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] After 37ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] After 17ms SMT Verify possible using 20 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:20] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 4 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 20/19 trap constraints in 661 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 88 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] After 788ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 14 ms.
[2022-05-15 16:14:21] [INFO   ] After 910ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 96 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 190 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=588 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=526 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=588 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 347949  steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=115 ) properties seen :{}
Probabilistic random walk after 347949  steps, saw 186360 distinct states, run finished after 3002 ms. (steps per millisecond=115 ) properties seen :0
Running SMT prover for 3 properties.
[2022-05-15 16:14:24] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:24] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 1 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:24] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  40 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:24] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  40 positive and 16 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] After 89ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  40 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  40 positive and 16 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] After 33ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] After 16ms SMT Verify possible using 20 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 20/19 trap constraints in 645 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 89 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] After 768ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 16 ms.
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] After 877ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 96 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 27 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 23 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:25] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 1 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:26] [INFO   ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned [40, 47, 50, 53, 59, 62, 65, 70, 73, 79, 82, 85, 88, 91] 
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 162 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 1 : 82/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 82 /82 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 82/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 192 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=588 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=555 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001  steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=588 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 371007  steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=123 ) properties seen :{}
Probabilistic random walk after 371007  steps, saw 199824 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=123 ) properties seen :0
Running SMT prover for 3 properties.
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 82 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] Computed 42 place invariants in 2 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  40 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  40 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] After 74ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  40 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  40 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] After 31ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] After 15ms SMT Verify possible using 20 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:29] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 397 ms of which 32 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 356 ms of which 32 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 11/10 trap constraints in 1085 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 29 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] After 1144ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 13 ms.
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] After 1244ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
Fused 3 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 6 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 82 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 82/82 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 82 /82 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 82/82 places, 440/440 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 82/82 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 82 /82 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 82 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Computed 42 place invariants in 1 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned [] 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 82 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] Computed 42 place invariants in 1 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:30] [INFO   ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 206 ms returned [] 
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 337 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Redundant transitions in 28 ms returned [] 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 82 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Computed 42 place invariants in 0 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 156 ms found 0 transitions. 
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 82/82 places, 440/440 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 130 edges and 82 vertex of which 26 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 56 places using SCC suffix rule.10 ms
Discarding 56 places :
Also discarding 308 output transitions 
Drop transitions removed 308 transitions 
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 108 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 108 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 24 transition count 24
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions. 
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 18 transition count 21
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions 
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 18 transition count 18
Free-agglomeration rule  applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 18 transition count 15
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions. 
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 12 transition count 12
Applied a total of 135 rules in 19 ms. Remains 12 /82 variables (removed 70) and now considering 12/440 (removed 428) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 3 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 12 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Computed 6 place invariants in 1 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] [Real]Absence check using  6 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] After 6ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] After 11ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2 real:1 
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 2 ms.
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] After 38ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] [Nat]Absence check using  6 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] After 6ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] After 10ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 4 ms.
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] After 35ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7236358294097992258.gal : 1 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6651456703943736716.prop : 0 ms 
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /tmp/redAtoms6775256144282975066;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7236358294097992258.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6651456703943736716.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW' 
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-reach-linux64  --gc-threshold  2000000  --quiet  -i  /tmp...319
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6651456703943736716.prop.
Reachability property AtomicPropp68 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2
SDD size :1 after 16
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,64,0.01176,3780,2,19,7,95,8,0,69,46,0
 Total reachable state count : 64
Verifying 3 reachability properties.
Reachability property AtomicPropp20 is true.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp20,4,0.011975,3780,2,15,7,95,8,0,72,46,0
Reachability property AtomicPropp63 is true.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp63,8,0.012161,3780,2,16,7,95,8,0,74,46,0
Reachability property AtomicPropp68 is true.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp68,1,0.012341,3780,2,13,8,95,9,0,79,46,0
Successfully simplified 23 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas. 
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Input system was already deterministic with 440 transitions. 
Support contains 41 out of 96 places (down from 52) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 3 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Implicit Places using invariants in 179 ms returned [40, 56, 59, 62, 65, 70, 73, 76, 79, 82, 85, 88, 91] 
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 180 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 83/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Input system was already deterministic with 440 transitions. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8035234817650883699.gal : 16 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:31] [INFO   ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5263200004683342241.ctl : 1 ms 
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8035234817650883699.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5263200004683342241.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW' 
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64  --gc-threshold  2000000  --quiet  -i  /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.095757,9616,2,264,5,7737,6,0,775,3271,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((EX(AX(((p0_5==0)||(p1_19==1)))) + (AF((p3_9==1)) * EX((p3_1==1)))) U (((!(EG((flag_1_1==1))) + A(((flag_1_13==0)||(p3_5==1)) U (p0_...230
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((EX(!(EX(!(((p0_5==0)||(p1_19==1)))))) + (!(EG(!((p3_9==1)))) * EX((p3_1==1)))) U (((!(E...349
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t43, t65, t87, t109, t131, t153, t175, t197, t219, t241, t263, t285, t307, t329, t351, t...278
(forward)formula 0,0,0.551581,24956,1,0,951,111108,936,479,7144,84177,964
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL 
Formula is FALSE !
 *************************************** 
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 29 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:32] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:32] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 3 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:32] [INFO   ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned [40, 47, 50, 53, 59, 62, 65, 70, 73, 76, 79, 82, 85, 88, 91] 
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 153 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 81 /81 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 81/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:32] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:32] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:32] [INFO   ] Input system was already deterministic with 440 transitions. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:32] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:32] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5616333633636237082.gal : 317 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10009564581778743147.ctl : 0 ms 
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5616333633636237082.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10009564581778743147.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW' 
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64  --gc-threshold  2000000  --quiet  -i  /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.093667,9656,2,256,5,7645,6,0,767,3215,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((p0_6==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((p0_6==0)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t43, t65, t87, t109, t131, t153, t175, t197, t219, t241, t263, t285, t307, t329, t351, t...278
(forward)formula 0,0,0.323064,16108,1,0,910,74537,902,443,6948,43274,893
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL 
Formula is FALSE !
 *************************************** 
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 0 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Implicit Places using invariants in 154 ms returned [40, 47, 50, 53, 56, 59, 62, 65, 70, 73, 76, 79, 82, 85, 88, 91] 
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 155 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 80/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Input system was already deterministic with 440 transitions. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality179205650260646770.gal : 3 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2008742162221668872.ctl : 1 ms 
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality179205650260646770.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2008742162221668872.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW' 
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64  --gc-threshold  2000000  --quiet  -i  /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.091354,9416,2,252,5,7566,6,0,763,3181,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.097911,9416,1,0,6,7566,7,1,1378,3181,1
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL 
Formula is FALSE !
 *************************************** 
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 1 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned [40, 47, 50, 53, 56, 59, 62, 65, 70, 73, 76, 79, 82, 85, 88, 91] 
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 142 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 80/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:33] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Input system was already deterministic with 440 transitions. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality145028953132999555.gal : 2 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4079989633369154973.ctl : 1 ms 
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality145028953132999555.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4079989633369154973.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW' 
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64  --gc-threshold  2000000  --quiet  -i  /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.093207,9484,2,252,5,7566,6,0,763,3181,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p3_3!=1) U AX(((!(EX(TRUE)) * !((((p1_6==0)||(flag_1_12==1))||((p3_7==0)||(flag_0_8==1))))) * EX((flag_0_5==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(p3_3!=1)) * !(EX(!(((!(EX(TRUE)) * !((((p1_6==0)||(flag_1_12==1))||((p3_7==0)||(flag_0_8==1))))) * ...187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t43, t65, t87, t109, t131, t153, t175, t197, t219, t241, t263, t285, t307, t329, t351, t...278
(forward)formula 0,0,0.32332,15908,1,0,915,70344,898,446,6877,43809,892
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL 
Formula is FALSE !
 *************************************** 
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 1 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned [40, 47, 50, 53, 56, 59, 62, 65, 70, 73, 76, 79, 82, 85, 88, 91] 
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 142 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 80/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Input system was already deterministic with 440 transitions. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5227035809844166442.gal : 2 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:34] [INFO   ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13540823107150622382.ctl : 0 ms 
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5227035809844166442.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13540823107150622382.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW' 
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64  --gc-threshold  2000000  --quiet  -i  /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.089378,9584,2,252,5,7566,6,0,763,3181,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((AF((p3_12==0)) * (p3_3==1)) * (((EG(((flag_1_18==0)||(flag_0_19==1))) + (p1_11==0)) + ((flag_0_7==1)||(flag_1_16==1))) * ((flag_1...177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((!(EG(!((p3_12==0)))) * (p3_3==1)) * (((EG(((flag_1_18==0)||(flag_0_19==1))) + (...243
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t43, t65, t87, t109, t131, t153, t175, t197, t219, t241, t263, t285, t307, t329, t351, t...278
(forward)formula 0,1,0.374529,17416,1,0,925,77953,917,454,7012,48308,913
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL 
Formula is TRUE !
 *************************************** 
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 1 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Implicit Places using invariants in 150 ms returned [40, 47, 50, 53, 59, 62, 65, 70, 73, 79, 82, 85, 91] 
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 150 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 83/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Input system was already deterministic with 440 transitions. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5800972324071842779.gal : 2 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7115798235236109617.ctl : 0 ms 
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5800972324071842779.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7115798235236109617.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW' 
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64  --gc-threshold  2000000  --quiet  -i  /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.096127,9528,2,264,5,8001,6,0,775,3318,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(AG(((EF(((p1_11==0)||(flag_0_15==1))) * EG((flag_0_4==1))) * (p3_10==0)))) + AG(((p3_16==0)||(p0_6==1)))) + EX((((p0_17==0)||(p3_4==...221
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((Init * !(EX((((p0_17==0)||(p3_4==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(((p3_0==0)||(p0_13==1)) U ((p3_18==0)||(p3_15==1)...311
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t43, t65, t87, t109, t131, t153, t175, t197, t219, t241, t263, t285, t307, t329, t351, t...278
(forward)formula 0,1,0.40626,18584,1,0,925,82303,917,456,7174,52390,920
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL 
Formula is TRUE !
 *************************************** 
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 0 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned [40, 47, 53, 56, 59, 62, 65, 70, 73, 76, 79, 82, 85, 88, 91] 
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 144 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 81 /81 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 81/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Input system was already deterministic with 440 transitions. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12866785276823936269.gal : 1 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:35] [INFO   ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17445716857222656011.ctl : 0 ms 
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12866785276823936269.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17445716857222656011.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW' 
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64  --gc-threshold  2000000  --quiet  -i  /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.093369,9436,2,256,5,7623,6,0,767,3211,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((((flag_0_14==0)||(p0_4==1)) + (AG(((flag_0_3==0)||(p3_4==1))) * AF(EX(AF(((flag_1_10==0)||(flag_0_4==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(((flag_0_14==0)||(p0_4==1)))),TRUE) * !(((flag_0_3==0)||(p3_4==1))))] = FALSE * [FwdG((EY(...254
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t43, t65, t87, t109, t131, t153, t175, t197, t219, t241, t263, t285, t307, t329, t351, t...278
(forward)formula 0,0,0.378206,17760,1,0,919,76411,912,451,7098,48318,901
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL 
Formula is FALSE !
 *************************************** 
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:36] [INFO   ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events) 
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 96 cols
[2022-05-15 16:14:36] [INFO   ] Computed 56 place invariants in 1 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:36] [INFO   ] Implicit Places using invariants in 154 ms returned [40, 47, 50, 53, 56, 59, 62, 65, 70, 73, 76, 79, 82, 85, 88, 91] 
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 155 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 80/96 places, 440/440 transitions.
[2022-05-15 16:14:36] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:36] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:36] [INFO   ] Input system was already deterministic with 440 transitions. 
[2022-05-15 16:14:36] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:36] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:36] [INFO   ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2878623382991415960.gal : 2 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:36] [INFO   ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7446160421229930230.ctl : 0 ms 
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2878623382991415960.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7446160421229930230.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW' 
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64  --gc-threshold  2000000  --quiet  -i  /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.089605,9576,2,252,5,7566,6,0,763,3181,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((p3_11==1)&&((p1_18==0)||(p1_18==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((p3_11==1)&&((p1_18==0)||(p1_18==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t43, t65, t87, t109, t131, t153, t175, t197, t219, t241, t263, t285, t307, t329, t351, t...278
(forward)formula 0,0,0.610707,26016,1,0,952,142502,906,487,6931,83553,938
FORMULA Dekker-PT-020-CTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL 
Formula is FALSE !
 *************************************** 
[2022-05-15 16:14:37] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms 
[2022-05-15 16:14:37] [INFO   ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms 
Total runtime 23088 ms.
BK_STOP 1652631277406
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Dekker-PT-020"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
	rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo "    Executing tool itstools"
echo "    Input is Dekker-PT-020, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo "    Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo "    Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo "    Number of cores is 4"
echo "    Run identifier is r060-tall-165254772300609"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Dekker-PT-020.tgz
mv Dekker-PT-020 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
	rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
	echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
	echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ]  ; then 
	echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
	echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
	echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
	echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
	for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
		echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
	done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
	echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
	for x in $(grep '
		echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
	done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
	echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT  bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
	echo
	echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;
