About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
241.735 | 16122.00 | 20354.00 | 2879.20 | FFFTTFTFFFFFFFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r024-tall-165251919000780.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r024-tall-165251919000780
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 244K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K Apr 29 12:31 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K Apr 29 12:31 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K Apr 29 12:30 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K Apr 29 12:30 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 9 07:14 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 9 07:14 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 9 07:14 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 9 07:14 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 9 07:14 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 9 07:14 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K May 10 09:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1652689778906
Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-16 08:29:40] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-16 08:29:40] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-16 08:29:40] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 60 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:40] [INFO ] Transformed 25 places.
[2022-05-16 08:29:40] [INFO ] Transformed 18 transitions.
[2022-05-16 08:29:40] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 25 places and 18 transitions in 181 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 21 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 25 /25 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 25 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:40] [INFO ] Computed 8 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 126 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 25 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:40] [INFO ] Computed 8 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 25 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:40] [INFO ] Computed 8 place invariants in 9 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:40] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 101 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Support contains 21 out of 25 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-16 08:29:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Finished random walk after 132 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 19 properties in 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 )
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(G(X((!(p0 U X(p1))||p2)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 2 ms. Remains 22 /25 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:41] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 26 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 21 /21 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 349 ms :[true, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2)), p1, p1]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-00 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=p2, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=1, aps=[p2:(AND (LT s9 1) (OR (LT s11 1) (LT s16 1))), p0:(GEQ s10 1), p1:(GEQ s9 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 26 steps with 0 reset in 5 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-00 finished in 443 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 21 transition count 16
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 19 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 17 transition count 14
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 17 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 13 transition count 10
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 11 transition count 8
Applied a total of 24 rules in 14 ms. Remains 11 /25 variables (removed 14) and now considering 8/18 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:41] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned [8, 10]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 26 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 9/25 places, 8/18 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 9 transition count 6
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 7 transition count 6
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 7 transition count 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 6 transition count 5
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 6 /9 variables (removed 3) and now considering 5/8 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 6 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:41] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 6 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 55 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 6/25 places, 5/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 6/25 places, 5/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 42 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-02 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s2 1) (GEQ s5 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 36232 steps with 5617 reset in 92 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-02 finished in 246 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U p1)||F(X(p2))))'
Support contains 4 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 21 /25 variables (removed 4) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:42] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 26 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 20/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 122 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s14 1)), p0:(GEQ s10 1), p2:(OR (AND (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s14 1)) (GEQ s12 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7775 reset in 149 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7718 reset in 217 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 1379 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP to 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 62 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Finished random walk after 33 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=16 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 270 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 27 ms :[(NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 28 ms :[(NOT p2)]
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 20 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:44] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:44] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:44] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-16 08:29:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 11 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:44] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 17/17/17 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2022-05-16 08:29:44] [INFO ] Added : 3 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 12 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Support contains 3 out of 20 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 20/20 places, 18/18 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 20 transition count 16
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 18 transition count 13
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 15 transition count 13
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 15 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 12 transition count 10
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 11 transition count 9
Applied a total of 18 rules in 11 ms. Remains 11 /20 variables (removed 9) and now considering 9/18 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:44] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned [10]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 20 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 10/20 places, 9/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 10 /10 variables (removed 0) and now considering 9/9 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 10/20 places, 9/18 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p2), (X (NOT p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 111 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 26 ms :[(NOT p2)]
Finished random walk after 6 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=3 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p2), (X (NOT p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2)), (F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 114 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 27 ms :[(NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 28 ms :[(NOT p2)]
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 10 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 8/8/8 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 4 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(NOT p2)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25894 reset in 86 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25797 reset in 77 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin7033652920700459651
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 9 transitions.
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 9 transitions.
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 9 transitions.
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Built C files in 6ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin7033652920700459651
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7033652920700459651;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 184 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7033652920700459651;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin7033652920700459651;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased3568192645020020590.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 61 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-03 finished in 3474 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 21 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 17 transition count 13
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 13
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 13 transition count 10
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 10 transition count 7
Applied a total of 26 rules in 7 ms. Remains 10 /25 variables (removed 15) and now considering 7/18 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 10 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned [9]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 27 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 9/25 places, 7/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 9 /9 variables (removed 0) and now considering 7/7 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 9/25 places, 7/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 38 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s2 1) (GEQ s6 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25763 reset in 54 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25745 reset in 56 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 683 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 6 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 114 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 25 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[(NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 9 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 6/6/6 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 5 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 2 out of 9 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 9/9 places, 7/7 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 9 /9 variables (removed 0) and now considering 7/7 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 9 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 9 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 9 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 27 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 9/9 places, 7/7 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 105 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 26 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 6 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 108 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 25 ms :[(NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 9 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 6/6/6 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 5 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25831 reset in 56 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25792 reset in 61 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin832758601071496914
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 7 transitions.
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 7 transitions.
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 7 transitions.
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Built C files in 2ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin832758601071496914
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin832758601071496914;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 78 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin832758601071496914;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 28 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin832758601071496914;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased16574313944814590063.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 47 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-04 finished in 2002 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(G((!(p0 U p1)||!p0)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 21 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 17 transition count 13
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 13
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 14 transition count 11
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 12 transition count 9
Applied a total of 22 rules in 2 ms. Remains 12 /25 variables (removed 13) and now considering 9/18 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 12 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 12 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 51 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 12 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 19 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 12/25 places, 9/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 12/25 places, 9/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[(AND p0 p1), (AND p0 p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=p1, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(GEQ s11 1), p1:(AND (GEQ s2 1) (GEQ s8 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 209 reset in 134 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 217 steps with 0 reset with depth 218 and stack size 218 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-05 finished in 295 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(X(F((F(G(X(X(p0))))||p0)))))'
Support contains 1 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 21 transition count 12
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 15 transition count 12
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 15 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 13 transition count 10
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 9 transition count 6
Applied a total of 28 rules in 5 ms. Remains 9 /25 variables (removed 16) and now considering 6/18 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 9 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned [6, 8]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 24 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 7/25 places, 6/18 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 7 transition count 4
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 5 transition count 4
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 5 /7 variables (removed 2) and now considering 4/6 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 5 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:47] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 5 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:48] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 21 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 43 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 5/25 places, 4/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 5/25 places, 4/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 66 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-07 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(LT s2 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8125 reset in 59 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 47 steps with 3 reset with depth 18 and stack size 18 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-07 finished in 222 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(!X(F((X(!F(p1))&&p0)))) U p2))'
Support contains 5 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 22 transition count 16
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 20 transition count 15
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 19 transition count 15
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 19 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 16 transition count 12
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 14 transition count 10
Applied a total of 19 rules in 7 ms. Remains 14 /25 variables (removed 11) and now considering 10/18 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 10 rows 14 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:48] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned [13]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 39 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 13/25 places, 10/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 13 /13 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10/10 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 13/25 places, 10/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 104 ms :[(NOT p2), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-08 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s11 1)), p0:(AND (GEQ s3 1) (GEQ s8 1)), p1:(LT s12 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1930 reset in 112 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 4154 steps with 92 reset with depth 72 and stack size 72 in 4 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-08 finished in 288 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(F(G((!((F(p0)||p1) U X(p2))||p1))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 2 ms. Remains 22 /25 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:48] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 28 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 21 /21 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 253 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-09 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND p1 p0 p2), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0) p2), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0 p2), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(OR (AND p1 p0) (AND p1 p2)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND p1 p0), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=(OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (AND p0 (NOT p2))), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0 p2), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0 p2), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=1, aps=[p1:(LT s16 1), p0:(AND (GEQ s4 1) (GEQ s18 1)), p2:(GEQ s6 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 132 reset in 127 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1054 steps with 0 reset with depth 1055 and stack size 1055 in 2 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-09 finished in 435 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(p0)&&(G(p1) U p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /25 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:48] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:48] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 68 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:48] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 30 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 22/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 127 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-10 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s7 1) (GEQ s20 1)), p1:(AND (GEQ s2 1) (GEQ s14 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-10 finished in 245 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((p0 U G((G(p1) U p2)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 23 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 19 transition count 14
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 19 transition count 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 18 transition count 13
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 17 transition count 12
Applied a total of 14 rules in 3 ms. Remains 17 /25 variables (removed 8) and now considering 12/18 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 17 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned [10]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 29 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 16/25 places, 12/18 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 16 transition count 10
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 14 transition count 10
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 14 transition count 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 13 transition count 9
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 13 /16 variables (removed 3) and now considering 9/12 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 13 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 13 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 52 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 13/25 places, 9/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 13/25 places, 9/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 298 ms :[(NOT p2), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(OR (AND p2 p0) (AND p1 p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0, 1} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}, { cond=(OR (AND p2 (NOT p0)) (AND p1 (NOT p0))), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 p0), acceptance={1} source=0 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 p0), acceptance={0, 1} source=0 dest: 6}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0, 1} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0, 1} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}, { cond=(OR p2 p1), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0, 1} source=5 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p2 p1 p0), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 p0), acceptance={1} source=5 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p2 p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0, 1} source=6 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 p0), acceptance={1} source=6 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 p0), acceptance={0, 1} source=6 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p2 p1), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 7}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(AND (GEQ s2 1) (GEQ s9 1)), p0:(LT s8 1), p1:(AND (GEQ s4 1) (GEQ s11 1))], nbAcceptance=2, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null][true, true, true, true, true, true, true, true]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 20 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-11 finished in 411 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(G(F(X(X(G(X(G(F((F(p1)&&p0)))))))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 21 transition count 15
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 18 transition count 13
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 13
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 13 transition count 10
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 11 transition count 8
Applied a total of 24 rules in 6 ms. Remains 11 /25 variables (removed 14) and now considering 8/18 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned [8]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 25 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 10/25 places, 8/18 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 10 transition count 6
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 8 transition count 6
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 8 transition count 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 7 transition count 5
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 7 /10 variables (removed 3) and now considering 5/8 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 17 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 20 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 38 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 7/25 places, 5/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 7/25 places, 5/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 111 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-12 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (GEQ s3 1) (GEQ s5 1)), p0:(AND (GEQ s3 1) (GEQ s5 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 16566 reset in 82 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 16161 reset in 139 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 184 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 1 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (F p1), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 238 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 114 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 112 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 4/4/4 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 0 ms.
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Added : 3 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 6 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 4/4/4 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Added : 3 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 4 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 2 out of 7 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 7/7 places, 5/5 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 7 /7 variables (removed 0) and now considering 5/5 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 17 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 19 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 38 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:50] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 17 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 7/7 places, 5/5 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 2677 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 110 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 1 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=1 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (F p1), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 510 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 91 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 4/4/4 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Added : 3 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 4 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 4/4/4 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 0 ms.
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Added : 3 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 4 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 56266 steps with 8814 reset in 35 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-12 finished in 5175 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(G(p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 22 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 18 transition count 13
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 17 transition count 13
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 17 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 14 transition count 10
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 11 transition count 7
Applied a total of 25 rules in 10 ms. Remains 11 /25 variables (removed 14) and now considering 7/18 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned [6, 10]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 26 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 9/25 places, 7/18 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 9 transition count 6
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 8 transition count 6
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 8 transition count 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 7 transition count 5
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 7 /9 variables (removed 2) and now considering 5/7 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 08:29:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 21 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 40 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 7/25 places, 5/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 7/25 places, 5/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-13 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (LT s3 1) (LT s6 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 355 reset in 90 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 4 steps with 0 reset with depth 5 and stack size 5 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-LTLFireability-13 finished in 216 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 14835 ms.
BK_STOP 1652689795028
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r024-tall-165251919000780"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0.tgz
mv ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;