Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r024-tall-165251918500402.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-11, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r024-tall-165251918500402
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 372K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K Apr 29 23:59 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K Apr 29 23:59 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K Apr 29 23:58 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K Apr 29 23:58 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 07:09 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 9 07:09 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 9 07:10 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 9 07:10 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 9 07:10 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 9 07:10 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 141K May 10 09:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652629494688

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-15 15:44:55] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-15 15:44:55] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-15 15:44:56] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 102 ms
[2022-05-15 15:44:56] [INFO ] Transformed 567 places.
[2022-05-15 15:44:56] [INFO ] Transformed 508 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:44:56] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-15 15:44:56] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 567 places and 508 transitions in 205 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 11 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 7 transitions.
Support contains 122 out of 560 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 560/560 places, 501/501 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 556 transition count 501
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 499 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 1 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 499 transition count 444
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 477 transition count 422
Iterating global reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 477 transition count 422
Applied a total of 162 rules in 129 ms. Remains 477 /560 variables (removed 83) and now considering 422/501 (removed 79) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 422 rows 477 cols
[2022-05-15 15:44:56] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 28 ms
[2022-05-15 15:44:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 340 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 422 rows 477 cols
[2022-05-15 15:44:56] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 14 ms
[2022-05-15 15:44:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 419 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 789 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 422 rows 477 cols
[2022-05-15 15:44:57] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-15 15:44:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 221 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 477/560 places, 422/501 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 477/560 places, 422/501 transitions.
Support contains 122 out of 477 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-15 15:44:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 66 ms
[2022-05-15 15:44:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2022-05-15 15:44:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 422 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 75 resets, run finished after 625 ms. (steps per millisecond=16 ) properties (out of 72) seen :26
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 46 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 422 rows 477 cols
[2022-05-15 15:44:58] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 13 ms
[2022-05-15 15:44:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 49 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 15:44:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 49 positive and 42 generalized place invariants in 20 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 15:44:59] [INFO ] After 486ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :3 sat :7 real:36
[2022-05-15 15:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 107 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:00] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 9/8 trap constraints in 730 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 144 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 157 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 115 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 101 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 97 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 96 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 98 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 89 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 101 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 90 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 84 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 92 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 96 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 101 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 102 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 105 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:02] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 17/16 trap constraints in 2094 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 113 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:02] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 155 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:03] [INFO ] After 3701ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :3 sat :0 real:43
[2022-05-15 15:45:03] [INFO ] After 4442ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :3 sat :0 real:43
[2022-05-15 15:45:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 49 positive place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 15:45:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 49 positive and 42 generalized place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 15:45:04] [INFO ] After 1087ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :9 sat :37
[2022-05-15 15:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 51 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 13/12 trap constraints in 859 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 104 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 100 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 99 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:06] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 398 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 121 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 132 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 116 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 120 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 120 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 146 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 122 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 101 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 97 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 95 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:08] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 13/12 trap constraints in 1713 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 105 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:08] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 146 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 90 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:08] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 136 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 102 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:08] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 145 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 107 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:08] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 151 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:09] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 402 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:09] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 91 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:10] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 547 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:10] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 87 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 110 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:10] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 153 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:10] [INFO ] After 7204ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :10 sat :36
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 1114 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:45:12] [INFO ] After 9060ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :10 sat :36
Fused 46 Parikh solutions to 35 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 10 properties in 527 ms.
Support contains 45 out of 477 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1040 edges and 477 vertex of which 476 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 44 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 44 transitions
Performed 44 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 44
Iterating post reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 476 transition count 377
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 432 transition count 372
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 427 transition count 372
Performed 85 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 85 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 427 transition count 287
Deduced a syphon composed of 85 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 15 places
Reduce places removed 100 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 185 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 327 transition count 287
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 298 place count 313 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 313 transition count 273
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 313 transition count 271
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 311 transition count 271
Performed 97 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 97
Deduced a syphon composed of 97 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 100 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 197 rules applied. Total rules applied 513 place count 211 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 514 place count 211 transition count 173
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 516 place count 210 transition count 177
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 7 times.
Drop transitions removed 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 523 place count 210 transition count 177
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 527 place count 210 transition count 177
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 528 place count 209 transition count 176
Applied a total of 528 rules in 96 ms. Remains 209 /477 variables (removed 268) and now considering 176/422 (removed 246) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 209/477 places, 176/422 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 609 resets, run finished after 384 ms. (steps per millisecond=26 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 14 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 14 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 13 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 14 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 14 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 15 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 13 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 16 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 12 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 13 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 15 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 12 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 13 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 15 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 14 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 13 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 14 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 15 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 14 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 14 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 14 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 13 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 15 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 1000001 steps, saw 178052 distinct states, run finished after 2907 ms. (steps per millisecond=343 ) properties seen :25
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 209 cols
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] Computed 73 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 50 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 50 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] After 167ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 50 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 50 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] After 97ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] After 36ms SMT Verify possible using 5 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 143 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] After 214ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 33 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:45:16] [INFO ] After 396ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 209 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 176/176 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 209 transition count 171
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 204 transition count 171
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 204 transition count 153
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 183 transition count 153
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 177 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 177 transition count 147
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 160 transition count 130
Applied a total of 95 rules in 21 ms. Remains 160 /209 variables (removed 49) and now considering 130/176 (removed 46) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 160/209 places, 130/176 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 990 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=400 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 217 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=909 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Probably explored full state space saw : 11880 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 39610 steps, saw 11880 distinct states, run finished after 96 ms. (steps per millisecond=412 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 11880 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 39610 steps, saw 11880 distinct states, run finished after 91 ms. (steps per millisecond=435 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 11 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-05-15 15:45:17] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2022-05-15 15:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-15 15:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 422 transitions.
Support contains 93 out of 477 places (down from 105) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 462 stabilizing places and 407 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1040 edges and 477 vertex of which 476 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.12 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 451 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 451 transition count 396
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 438 transition count 383
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 438 transition count 383
Applied a total of 78 rules in 18 ms. Remains 438 /477 variables (removed 39) and now considering 383/422 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 383 rows 438 cols
[2022-05-15 15:45:17] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 383 rows 438 cols
[2022-05-15 15:45:17] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 432 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 590 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 383 rows 438 cols
[2022-05-15 15:45:17] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 216 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 438/477 places, 383/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 438/477 places, 383/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 383 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:45:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability654724270437332185.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6636376119081452310.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability654724270437332185.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6636376119081452310.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 15:45:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 15:45:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph749071158257966246.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph749071158257966246.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph749071158257966246.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph749071158257966246.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph749071158257966246.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 15:45:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 15:45:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 15:45:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 254 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:45:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 148 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:45:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5896681964118238449.gal : 15 ms
[2022-05-15 15:45:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15843824722353659819.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5896681964118238449.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15843824722353659819.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.1963e+22,0.922336,36320,5372,58,60595,706,1051,119444,64,1812,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((EF((i1.u18.p57==1)) * (i8.u108.p349==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((E(TRUE U (i1.u18.p57==1)) * (i8.u108.p349==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t150, t158, t174, t186, t194, t206, t218, t222, t248, t374, t375, t376, t378,...1168
(forward)formula 0,1,13.7996,435548,1,0,788278,706,6677,1.54842e+06,279,2074,1749723
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 233 edges and 477 vertex of which 6 / 477 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1034 edges and 472 vertex of which 471 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 63 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 63 transitions
Performed 63 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 63
Iterating post reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 470 transition count 351
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 407 transition count 351
Performed 93 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 93 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 407 transition count 258
Deduced a syphon composed of 93 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Reduce places removed 111 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 204 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 296 transition count 258
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 355 place count 273 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 273 transition count 235
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 273 transition count 233
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 271 transition count 233
Performed 105 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 105
Deduced a syphon composed of 105 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 108 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 213 rules applied. Total rules applied 595 place count 163 transition count 128
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 601 place count 163 transition count 128
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 602 place count 162 transition count 127
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 603 place count 161 transition count 127
Applied a total of 603 rules in 59 ms. Remains 161 /477 variables (removed 316) and now considering 127/422 (removed 295) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 127 rows 161 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:02] [INFO ] Computed 69 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 207 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 127 rows 161 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:02] [INFO ] Computed 69 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 346 ms returned [63, 64, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98, 99, 101, 103, 105, 107, 109]
Discarding 23 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 567 ms to find 23 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 138/477 places, 127/422 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 138 transition count 115
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 126 transition count 115
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 4 places
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 117 transition count 110
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 115 transition count 108
Applied a total of 42 rules in 14 ms. Remains 115 /138 variables (removed 23) and now considering 108/127 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 115 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Computed 43 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 115 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Computed 43 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 163 ms returned [6, 7, 8, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 95/477 places, 108/422 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 341 edges and 95 vertex of which 86 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 9 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 9 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 76 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 76 transition count 67
Applied a total of 21 rules in 9 ms. Remains 76 /95 variables (removed 19) and now considering 67/108 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 76 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 76 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned [15, 23, 25]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 73/477 places, 67/422 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 72 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 72 transition count 66
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 72 /73 variables (removed 1) and now considering 66/67 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 72 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 72 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 4 : 72/477 places, 66/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 4 iterations. Remains : 72/477 places, 66/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5901542665533966452.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17632033105180408621.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5901542665533966452.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17632033105180408621.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3654,0.038354,6092,2,647,5,7561,6,0,350,3778,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((p547==1) + EG((p280!=1))) + ((p63==1)&&(p5==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p63==1)&&(p5==1)))) * !((p547==1))) * !(EG((p280!=1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t22, t23, t24, t25, t38, t43, t46, t47, t48, t49, t55, Intersection with reachable at ea...219
(forward)formula 0,0,0.211786,14448,1,0,184,56307,157,97,2218,39019,217
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 224 edges and 477 vertex of which 4 / 477 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1037 edges and 474 vertex of which 473 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 59 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 59 transitions
Performed 59 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 59
Iterating post reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 472 transition count 358
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 413 transition count 357
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 412 transition count 357
Performed 91 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 91 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 412 transition count 266
Deduced a syphon composed of 91 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 107 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 198 rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 305 transition count 266
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 343 place count 282 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 282 transition count 243
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 282 transition count 242
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 281 transition count 242
Performed 106 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 106
Deduced a syphon composed of 106 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 109 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 215 rules applied. Total rules applied 583 place count 172 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 584 place count 171 transition count 135
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 585 place count 170 transition count 135
Applied a total of 585 rules in 47 ms. Remains 170 /477 variables (removed 307) and now considering 135/422 (removed 287) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:04] [INFO ] Computed 71 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned [0, 6, 9, 32, 33, 34, 35, 42, 45, 46, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 134]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 130 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/477 places, 135/422 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 135/135 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 152/477 places, 135/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8883427328811120960.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11969955147376607002.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8883427328811120960.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11969955147376607002.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,79986,0.176166,13076,2,3825,5,29214,6,0,742,23627,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((((((p417==1)&&(p52==1))&&((p282==1)&&(p432==1)))||(p46==1))||(p550==1))) + (AG(((p153==1)&&(p279==1))) * EG((p442==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((((p417==1)&&(p52==1))&&((p282==1)&&(p432==1)))||(p46==1))||(p550==1)))] != FALSE + [Fw...238
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 122/0/13
(forward)formula 0,1,0.739413,34904,1,0,9,133708,19,2,4238,63021,8
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 451 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 451 transition count 396
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 438 transition count 383
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 438 transition count 383
Applied a total of 78 rules in 20 ms. Remains 438 /477 variables (removed 39) and now considering 383/422 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 383 rows 438 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:05] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 222 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 383 rows 438 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:05] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 566 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 840 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 383 rows 438 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:05] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 241 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 438/477 places, 383/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 438/477 places, 383/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:46:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 383 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:46:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1905660382278475662.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4312510658748384513.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1905660382278475662.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4312510658748384513.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 15:46:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 15:46:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10190106911272765407.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10190106911272765407.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10190106911272765407.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10190106911272765407.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10190106911272765407.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 15:46:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 15:46:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 15:46:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 251 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:46:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:46:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10067622159597346131.gal : 15 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15219685010085574578.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10067622159597346131.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15219685010085574578.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.1963e+22,1.28667,41064,4618,64,55509,619,1052,184098,68,1400,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(((i9.i2.u115.p394==1)||(((i15.i0.u19.p100==1)&&(i15.i2.u95.p297==1))&&(i15.i0.u124.p548==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((i9.i2.u115.p394==1)||(((i15.i0.u19.p100==1)&&(i15.i2.u95.p297==1))&&(i15.i0.u124.p5...177
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t150, t170, t174, t178, t190, t198, t206, t214, t222, t248, t374, t376, t378,...1180
(forward)formula 0,1,7.52432,238912,1,0,379859,619,5931,1.07056e+06,289,1736,945859
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 455 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 455 transition count 400
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 444 transition count 389
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 444 transition count 389
Applied a total of 66 rules in 62 ms. Remains 444 /477 variables (removed 33) and now considering 389/422 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 389 rows 444 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:44] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 172 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 389 rows 444 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:44] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 399 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 593 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 389 rows 444 cols
[2022-05-15 15:46:44] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:44] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 207 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 444/477 places, 389/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 444/477 places, 389/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:46:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 389 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:46:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5063988575959962963.gal : 14 ms
[2022-05-15 15:46:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2035066557648755869.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5063988575959962963.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2035066557648755869.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 15:47:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-15 15:47:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 15:47:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8121244881471186010.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8121244881471186010.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8121244881471186010.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8121244881471186010.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8121244881471186010.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 15:47:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 15:47:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 15:47:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 246 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:47:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2022-05-15 15:47:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:47:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9553188517998991383.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 15:47:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15578189482957525844.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9553188517998991383.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15578189482957525844.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.27305e+22,1.15885,39180,4788,71,63316,638,1076,146973,64,1840,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF(((((AX((i12.i0.u20.p77==1)) + (i7.i0.u70.p213==1)) + ((((i12.i0.u32.p103==1)&&(i12.i0.u94.p292==1))&&(i12.i0.u123.p533==1))||(((i1...344
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U ((((!(EX(!((i12.i0.u20.p77==1)))) + (i7.i0.u70.p213==1)) + ((((i12.i0.u32.p103==1)&&(i12.i0...405
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t153, t157, t167, t179, t183, t199, t211, t223, t227, t254, t380, t382, i0.t1...1242
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,23.455,606252,1,0,1.10108e+06,995,8079,2.23688e+06,332,3558,1912038
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 453 transition count 398
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 453 transition count 398
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 441 transition count 386
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 441 transition count 386
Applied a total of 72 rules in 21 ms. Remains 441 /477 variables (removed 36) and now considering 386/422 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 441 cols
[2022-05-15 15:47:38] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-15 15:47:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 161 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 441 cols
[2022-05-15 15:47:39] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:47:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 505 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 680 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 441 cols
[2022-05-15 15:47:39] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 9 ms
[2022-05-15 15:47:39] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 222 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 441/477 places, 386/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 441/477 places, 386/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-15 15:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 15:47:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 386 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-15 15:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-15 15:47:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14328759749813829952.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:47:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1610009180664649640.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14328759749813829952.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1610009180664649640.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 15:48:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-15 15:48:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 15:48:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7318248896609011509.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7318248896609011509.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7318248896609011509.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7318248896609011509.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7318248896609011509.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 15:48:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 15:48:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 15:48:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 249 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:48:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 67 ms
[2022-05-15 15:48:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:48:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3062099519030103301.gal : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 15:48:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3306110276474844685.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3062099519030103301.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3306110276474844685.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.31605e+22,0.688502,30676,4380,66,50567,590,1062,99379,66,1549,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(((!(((i14.i0.u24.p85==1)&&(i14.i0.u93.p292==1))&&(i14.i0.u150.p551==1)))&&((i14.i0.u93.p289!=1)||((i5.i1.u87.p263==1)&&(!((i15.u99.p...210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX(((!(((i14.i0.u24.p85==1)&&(i14.i0.u93.p292==1))&&(i14.i0.u150.p551==1)))&&((i14.i0.u93.p289!=1)||...256
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t157, t161, t173, t181, t197, t201, t217, t221, t225, t251, t377, t378, t379,...1234
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 454 transition count 399
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 454 transition count 399
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 443 transition count 388
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 443 transition count 388
Applied a total of 68 rules in 16 ms. Remains 443 /477 variables (removed 34) and now considering 388/422 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 388 rows 443 cols
[2022-05-15 15:48:40] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:48:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 388 rows 443 cols
[2022-05-15 15:48:40] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:48:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 427 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 621 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 388 rows 443 cols
[2022-05-15 15:48:40] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:48:41] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 238 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 443/477 places, 388/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 443/477 places, 388/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:48:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 15:48:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-15 15:48:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 388 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:48:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:48:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 15:48:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18290443770266081162.gal : 17 ms
[2022-05-15 15:48:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17853692912602756367.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18290443770266081162.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17853692912602756367.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 15:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 15:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13929045199527063711.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13929045199527063711.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13929045199527063711.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13929045199527063711.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13929045199527063711.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 15:49:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 15:49:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 15:49:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 246 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 63 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 19 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:49:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8102528960145456535.gal : 321 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13791970481016642629.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8102528960145456535.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13791970481016642629.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.20342e+22,2.79093,75444,7246,64,103645,717,1058,324884,70,1760,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((i4.i0.u41.p124==1) U (EX(!(AG((((i11.i0.u20.p61==1)&&(i4.i1.u99.p306==1))&&(i2.i1.u120.p528==1))))) * (EF((i11.i2.u128.p449==1)) + ...280
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((i4.i0.u41.p124==1) U (EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((i11.i0.u20.p61==1)&&(i4.i1.u99.p306==1))&&(i...352
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t35, t153, t161, t177, t197, t213, t227, t253, t380, t381, t383, i0.t165, i0....1280
(forward)formula 0,0,24.6607,596428,1,0,982191,915,6813,2.46898e+06,332,2437,2183538
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1040 edges and 477 vertex of which 476 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 48 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 48 transitions
Performed 48 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 475 transition count 372
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 427 transition count 369
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 424 transition count 369
Performed 102 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 102 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 424 transition count 267
Deduced a syphon composed of 102 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 119 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 221 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 305 transition count 267
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 346 place count 283 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 283 transition count 245
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 283 transition count 244
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 370 place count 282 transition count 244
Performed 99 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 99 places in 5 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 102 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 201 rules applied. Total rules applied 571 place count 180 transition count 145
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Drop transitions removed 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 576 place count 180 transition count 145
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 577 place count 179 transition count 144
Applied a total of 577 rules in 71 ms. Remains 179 /477 variables (removed 298) and now considering 144/422 (removed 278) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 144 rows 179 cols
[2022-05-15 15:49:36] [INFO ] Computed 71 place invariants in 15 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 144 rows 179 cols
[2022-05-15 15:49:36] [INFO ] Computed 71 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 191 ms returned [91, 93, 95, 97, 99, 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, 110, 115, 117, 119, 121]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 353 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/477 places, 144/422 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 164 transition count 137
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 157 transition count 137
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 4 places
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 149 transition count 133
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 147 transition count 131
Applied a total of 30 rules in 22 ms. Remains 147 /164 variables (removed 17) and now considering 131/144 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 131 rows 147 cols
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Computed 53 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 131 rows 147 cols
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Computed 53 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 215 ms returned [7, 8, 9, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 42, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 57]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 332 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 127/477 places, 131/422 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 417 edges and 127 vertex of which 120 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 114 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 114 transition count 104
Applied a total of 13 rules in 22 ms. Remains 114 /127 variables (removed 13) and now considering 104/131 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 114 cols
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Computed 29 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 114 cols
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Computed 29 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 114/477 places, 104/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 3 iterations. Remains : 114/477 places, 104/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18096256614419330525.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15097366882912239576.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18096256614419330525.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15097366882912239576.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,191529,0.085132,8204,2,2179,5,12275,6,0,556,11649,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(((p65==1) * A((p319==1) U (((((p229==1)&&(p301==1))&&(p528==1))||(p47==1))||((p63==1)||(((p88==1)&&(p297==1))&&(p536==1)))))) U (p64...236
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU((Init * !(!(!((E(!((p64!=1)) U (!(((p65==1) * !((E(!((((((p229==1)&&(p301==1))&&(p528==1))||(p47==1))||...567
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t12, t14, t30, t36, t42, t43, t44, t45, t55, t65, t68, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, ...261
(forward)formula 0,0,2.62209,83808,1,0,429,444104,240,210,4083,466909,492
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 452 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 452 transition count 397
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 440 transition count 385
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 440 transition count 385
Applied a total of 74 rules in 23 ms. Remains 440 /477 variables (removed 37) and now considering 385/422 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 385 rows 440 cols
[2022-05-15 15:49:40] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 164 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 385 rows 440 cols
[2022-05-15 15:49:40] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 497 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 663 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 385 rows 440 cols
[2022-05-15 15:49:40] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:41] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 201 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 440/477 places, 385/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 440/477 places, 385/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:49:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 385 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:49:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10986583494423910688.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 15:49:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17241521319116666388.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10986583494423910688.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17241521319116666388.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 15:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:50:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 15:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14332110030009244666.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14332110030009244666.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14332110030009244666.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14332110030009244666.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14332110030009244666.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 15:50:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 15:50:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 15:50:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 250 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2022-05-15 15:50:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:50:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9891636689431278136.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:50:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4901161496813378448.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9891636689431278136.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4901161496813378448.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.42911e+22,0.86208,36956,3673,42,54824,585,1012,176904,55,1769,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(!(A((i16.u123.p435==1) U (i12.i1.u104.p329==1))) U (i4.i2.u90.p268==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!(!((E(!((i12.i1.u104.p329==1)) U (!((i16.u123.p435==1)) * !((i12.i1.u104.p329==1)))) + EG(!((i...213
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t152, t164, t172, t176, t180, t192, t196, t208, t216, t224, t242, t250, t376,...1183
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 452 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 452 transition count 397
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 441 transition count 386
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 441 transition count 386
Applied a total of 72 rules in 21 ms. Remains 441 /477 variables (removed 36) and now considering 386/422 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 441 cols
[2022-05-15 15:50:41] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-15 15:50:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 159 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 441 cols
[2022-05-15 15:50:41] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-15 15:50:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 463 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 624 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 441 cols
[2022-05-15 15:50:42] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:50:42] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 213 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 441/477 places, 386/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 441/477 places, 386/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:50:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:50:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 15:50:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 386 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:50:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 15:50:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 15:50:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12770574756321948467.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:50:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7964526651895280674.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12770574756321948467.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7964526651895280674.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 15:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 15:51:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 15:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1934673300205769473.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1934673300205769473.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1934673300205769473.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1934673300205769473.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1934673300205769473.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 15:51:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 15:51:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 15:51:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2022-05-15 15:51:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:51:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10432672756520797606.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:51:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2302863389125904109.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10432672756520797606.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2302863389125904109.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.1963e+22,0.939264,42132,4950,62,75671,880,901,170224,62,1920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(E((!(EG((i10.i1.i0.u84.p248==1))) * A((i17.u141.p518==1) U EF((((i16.u30.p88==1)&&(i16.u97.p297==1))&&(i16.u147.p536==1))))) U EF((EG...371
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !((!(E((!(EG((i10.i1.i0.u84.p248==1))) * !((E(!(E(TRUE U (((i16.u30.p88==1)&&(i16.u97.p297==1))&&(...634
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t152, t160, t176, t188, t200, t212, t220, t224, t242, t377, t378, t379, t381,...1143
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 452 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 452 transition count 397
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 439 transition count 384
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 439 transition count 384
Applied a total of 76 rules in 26 ms. Remains 439 /477 variables (removed 38) and now considering 384/422 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 384 rows 439 cols
[2022-05-15 15:51:42] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-15 15:51:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 152 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 384 rows 439 cols
[2022-05-15 15:51:42] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:51:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 448 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 603 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 384 rows 439 cols
[2022-05-15 15:51:43] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-15 15:51:43] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 220 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 439/477 places, 384/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 439/477 places, 384/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-15 15:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2022-05-15 15:51:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 384 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 15:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 15:51:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18138034168482049439.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:51:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6675511568609251481.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18138034168482049439.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6675511568609251481.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 15:52:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 15:52:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17640797757723006937.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17640797757723006937.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17640797757723006937.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17640797757723006937.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17640797757723006937.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 15:52:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 15:52:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 15:52:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 249 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:52:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:52:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3973934624693863962.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18359540641748084655.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3973934624693863962.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18359540641748084655.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.19808e+22,0.673174,28988,3624,55,44904,558,1033,127763,61,1333,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((i1.i0.u3.p7==0)) * AX(AX(AG(((i14.u118.p442==0) + EG((i5.i1.u19.p60==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX((i1.i0.u3.p7==0))))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(EY(EY(Init)),TRUE) * !((i14.u118.p442==0))) * !(EG((i5.i1....179
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t9, t151, t159, t175, t187, t199, t215, t223, t249, t375, t377, t379, i0.i0.u117.t63,...1233
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,0,9.64225,235284,1,0,452638,671,7331,1.18377e+06,302,2100,709752
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 453 transition count 398
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 453 transition count 398
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 441 transition count 386
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 441 transition count 386
Applied a total of 72 rules in 26 ms. Remains 441 /477 variables (removed 36) and now considering 386/422 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 441 cols
[2022-05-15 15:52:23] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 161 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 441 cols
[2022-05-15 15:52:23] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 460 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 622 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 441 cols
[2022-05-15 15:52:24] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:24] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 206 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 441/477 places, 386/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 441/477 places, 386/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:52:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 386 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:52:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15100087265379381402.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12083079423667130626.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15100087265379381402.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12083079423667130626.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 15:52:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 15:52:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9061912522780785374.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9061912522780785374.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9061912522780785374.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9061912522780785374.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9061912522780785374.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 15:52:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 15:52:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 15:52:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:52:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:52:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3001099131088218740.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1249369586050541013.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3001099131088218740.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1249369586050541013.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.1963e+22,0.927973,34020,4081,55,57636,697,1045,121914,65,1552,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(AX(((i5.u16.p48==1)&&(((i6.i0.u42.p121==0)||(i6.i1.u102.p321==0))||((i16.u121.p528==0)||(i10.i3.u119.p395==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((i5.u16.p48==1)&&(((i6.i0.u42.p121==0)||(i6.i1.u102.p321==0))||((i16.u1...209
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t151, t159, t163, t171, t175, t187, t195, t207, t215, t223, t377, t379, t381,...1217
(forward)formula 0,1,4.64167,142320,1,0,252590,809,6629,616989,311,2088,689516
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 453 transition count 398
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 453 transition count 398
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 440 transition count 385
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 440 transition count 385
Applied a total of 74 rules in 24 ms. Remains 440 /477 variables (removed 37) and now considering 385/422 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 385 rows 440 cols
[2022-05-15 15:52:59] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-15 15:52:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 385 rows 440 cols
[2022-05-15 15:52:59] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 490 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 668 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 385 rows 440 cols
[2022-05-15 15:53:00] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:00] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 202 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 440/477 places, 385/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 440/477 places, 385/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:53:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 385 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:53:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7179630682151773407.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1880162092767986004.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7179630682151773407.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1880162092767986004.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 15:53:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 15:53:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13441466449950397110.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13441466449950397110.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13441466449950397110.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13441466449950397110.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13441466449950397110.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 15:53:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 15:53:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 15:53:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 253 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:53:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:53:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17327555832673745981.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8781600926063700502.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17327555832673745981.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8781600926063700502.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.26274e+22,1.02768,37772,4408,77,59506,693,1023,140114,69,1725,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A((!((((i9.i0.u73.p219==1)&&(i9.i0.u116.p401==1))&&(i14.u118.p528==1))) + A(EG((i14.u117.p421==1)) U (i14.u117.p505==1))) U EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(TRUE))) * !((!((((i9.i0.u73.p219==1)&&(i9.i0.u116.p401==1))&&(i14.u118.p528==1))) ...342
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t60, t152, t164, t176, t188, t196, t208, t216, t224, t250, t376, t378, i0.t16...1209
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,0,6.25531,211400,1,0,375885,780,6299,844821,307,3141,1028479
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 229 edges and 477 vertex of which 6 / 477 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1034 edges and 472 vertex of which 471 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 62 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 62 transitions
Performed 62 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 62
Iterating post reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 470 transition count 352
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 408 transition count 351
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 407 transition count 351
Performed 91 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 91 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 407 transition count 260
Deduced a syphon composed of 91 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 108 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 199 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 299 transition count 260
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 350 place count 276 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 276 transition count 237
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 276 transition count 235
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 377 place count 274 transition count 235
Performed 101 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 101
Deduced a syphon composed of 101 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 104 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 205 rules applied. Total rules applied 582 place count 170 transition count 134
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 583 place count 169 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 584 place count 168 transition count 133
Applied a total of 584 rules in 37 ms. Remains 168 /477 variables (removed 309) and now considering 133/422 (removed 289) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 168 cols
[2022-05-15 15:53:36] [INFO ] Computed 70 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned [0, 4, 5, 28, 29, 30, 31, 39, 40, 41, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 54]
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 114 ms to find 17 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 151/477 places, 133/422 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 151 /151 variables (removed 0) and now considering 133/133 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 151/477 places, 133/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:53:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 133 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12538090518489029390.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17928088896872085747.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12538090518489029390.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17928088896872085747.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,52194,0.085428,7984,2,2081,5,10499,6,0,736,7942,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EF((p136==0)) * (A(!((((p217==1)&&(p387==1))&&(p520==1))) U E((p516==1) U (p255==1))) + EG(((p553==1)||(p257==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * E(TRUE U (p136==0))) * !(EG(!(E((p516==1) U (p255==1)))))) * !(E(!(E((p516==1) U (p255==1...330
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t8, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t83, t85, t86, t87, t91, t92, t93, ...285
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.6194,59952,1,0,394,285944,264,235,5656,297301,437
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 477/477 places, 422/422 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 452 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 452 transition count 397
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 440 transition count 385
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 440 transition count 385
Applied a total of 74 rules in 19 ms. Remains 440 /477 variables (removed 37) and now considering 385/422 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 385 rows 440 cols
[2022-05-15 15:53:38] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 155 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 385 rows 440 cols
[2022-05-15 15:53:38] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 481 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 637 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 385 rows 440 cols
[2022-05-15 15:53:39] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:39] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 198 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 440/477 places, 385/422 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 440/477 places, 385/422 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:53:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 385 transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:53:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14165263027959967924.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 15:53:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability812740868255516543.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14165263027959967924.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability812740868255516543.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 15:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-15 15:54:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 15:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4911182474303825370.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4911182474303825370.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4911182474303825370.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4911182474303825370.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4911182474303825370.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 15:54:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 15:54:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 15:54:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 251 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-15 15:54:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:54:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7123655191150930163.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 15:54:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6047503919235316199.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7123655191150930163.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6047503919235316199.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.1963e+22,0.904518,33664,3788,60,60364,625,1024,106641,64,1559,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((i3.u10.p23==1) * ((EX(((i4.u15.p36==0)||((i9.u72.p7==1)&&(i2.u129.p474==1)))) + AF((((i12.i0.u62.p180==0)||(i12.i1.u110.p366==0))||(...245
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i3.u10.p23==1))) * ((i4.u15.p36==0)||((i9.u72.p7==1)&&(i2.u129.p474==1))))] != FALSE ...412
(forward)formula 0,1,0.980216,33664,1,0,60364,625,1574,106641,86,1559,31850
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2022-05-15 15:54:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-15 15:54:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-15 15:54:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 15:54:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13560159427914819216.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13560159427914819216.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13560159427914819216.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13560159427914819216.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13560159427914819216.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 15:54:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 15:54:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 15:54:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 15:54:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2022-05-15 15:54:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 21 ms.
[2022-05-15 15:54:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2974832425762512833.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 15:54:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3261526532444160607.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2974832425762512833.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3261526532444160607.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.52129e+22,1.10166,40104,5507,82,62880,1021,1195,145143,75,3492,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(((!(((i5.i3.u27.p85==1)&&(i5.i3.u101.p292==1))&&(i5.i0.u139.p551==1)))&&((i5.i3.u101.p289!=1)||((i3.i1.u93.p263==1)&&(!((i11.i3.u105...213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX(((!(((i5.i3.u27.p85==1)&&(i5.i3.u101.p292==1))&&(i5.i0.u139.p551==1)))&&((i5.i3.u101.p289!=1)||((...259
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t9, t10, t47, t180, t190, t202, t206, t222, t234, t244, t271, t272, i0.i0.u82.t171, i...1509
(forward)formula 0,1,295.248,2198552,1,0,4.03394e+06,1021,2514,7.01111e+06,149,3998,1242403
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AX(E(!(A((i14.u134.p435==1) U (i10.i1.u111.p329==1))) U (i5.i1.u94.p268==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!(!((E(!((i10.i1.u111.p329==1)) U (!((i14.u134.p435==1)) * !((i10.i1.u111.p329==1)))) + EG(!((i...213
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 1,0,436.848,2423740,1,0,4.03394e+06,1058,2904,1.01241e+07,156,4120,132600
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: ((!(E((!(EG((i10.i0.u86.p248==1))) * A((i14.u159.p518==1) U EF((((i5.i3.u27.p88==1)&&(i5.i0.u102.p297==1))&&(i5.i0.u136.p536==1))))) U EF...390
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !((!(E((!(EG((i10.i0.u86.p248==1))) * !((E(!(E(TRUE U (((i5.i3.u27.p88==1)&&(i5.i0.u102.p297==1))&...667
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 2,1,762.784,2684044,1,0,4.03394e+06,1058,3655,1.06837e+07,198,4120,1309789
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Total runtime 1318621 ms.

BK_STOP 1652630814524

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-11"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-11, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r024-tall-165251918500402"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-11.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-11 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;