Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r024-tall-165251918200170.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r024-tall-165251918200170
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 628K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 29 21:20 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 105K Apr 29 21:20 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Apr 29 21:18 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K Apr 29 21:18 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 9 07:06 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K May 9 07:06 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 9 07:06 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 9 07:06 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 9 07:06 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.4K May 9 07:06 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 223K May 10 09:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652578629115

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 112 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Transformed 48 places.
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Transformed 288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 48 places and 288 transitions in 214 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 18 ms.
Support contains 46 out of 48 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 48/48 places, 288/288 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 46 transition count 288
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 46 /48 variables (removed 2) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 280 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:10] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:37:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-15 01:37:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:11] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:11] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 137 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/48 places, 288/288 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 46/48 places, 288/288 transitions.
Support contains 46 out of 46 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 111 resets, run finished after 587 ms. (steps per millisecond=17 ) properties (out of 95) seen :39
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 36 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 30 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 56) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 54) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 54) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 54) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=32 ) properties (out of 54) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 54) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 ) properties (out of 54) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 54) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 54) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 54) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 54) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 52) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 52) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 51) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 29 ms. (steps per millisecond=34 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 50) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 50 properties.
[2022-05-15 01:37:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:13] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 01:37:13] [INFO ] After 392ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :3 sat :0 real:47
[2022-05-15 01:37:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 01:37:14] [INFO ] After 353ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :10 sat :40
[2022-05-15 01:37:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:37:14] [INFO ] After 385ms SMT Verify possible using 22 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :10 sat :40
[2022-05-15 01:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 01:37:14] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 95 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:15] [INFO ] After 1015ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :16 sat :34
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 351 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:37:15] [INFO ] After 1865ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :16 sat :34
Fused 50 Parikh solutions to 34 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 270 ms.
Support contains 35 out of 46 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 39 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:15] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:16] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 97 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 45/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 111 resets, run finished after 272 ms. (steps per millisecond=36 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 30 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 470322 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=156 ) properties seen :{0=1, 1=1, 3=1, 4=1, 5=1, 6=1, 7=1, 8=1, 9=1, 10=1, 11=1, 12=1, 13=1, 14=1, 15=1, 16=1, 17=1, 18=1, 20=1, 21=1, 22=1, 23=1, 24=1, 25=1, 26=1, 27=1, 28=1, 29=1, 30=1, 32=1, 33=1}
Probabilistic random walk after 470322 steps, saw 115465 distinct states, run finished after 3002 ms. (steps per millisecond=156 ) properties seen :31
Running SMT prover for 3 properties.
[2022-05-15 01:37:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:19] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 01:37:19] [INFO ] After 72ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:3
[2022-05-15 01:37:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 01:37:19] [INFO ] After 41ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
[2022-05-15 01:37:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:37:19] [INFO ] After 36ms SMT Verify possible using 22 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
[2022-05-15 01:37:19] [INFO ] After 89ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 34 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:37:19] [INFO ] After 202ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 13 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 45 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 287/287 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 43 transition count 286
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 41 transition count 284
Applied a total of 7 rules in 25 ms. Remains 41 /45 variables (removed 4) and now considering 284/287 (removed 3) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 41/45 places, 284/287 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 155 resets, run finished after 153 ms. (steps per millisecond=65 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 71 resets, run finished after 88 ms. (steps per millisecond=113 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 71 resets, run finished after 69 ms. (steps per millisecond=144 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 67 resets, run finished after 58 ms. (steps per millisecond=172 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Probably explored full state space saw : 63294 states, properties seen :2
Probabilistic random walk after 226115 steps, saw 63294 distinct states, run finished after 905 ms. (steps per millisecond=249 ) properties seen :2
Explored full state space saw : 63294 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 226115 steps, saw 63294 distinct states, run finished after 431 ms. (steps per millisecond=524 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 17 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-05-15 01:37:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
Computed a total of 29 stabilizing places and 44 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:21] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 99 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4999230623173717192.gal : 7 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4341145117111472141.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4999230623173717192.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4341145117111472141.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,17.1146,476056,2,58987,5,767172,6,0,466,804609,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 01:37:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:37:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4990702190820566574.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4990702190820566574.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4990702190820566574.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4990702190820566574.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4990702190820566574.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:37:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:37:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:37:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 493 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 360 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 58 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:37:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14606168428269415879.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1917350707686615333.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14606168428269415879.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1917350707686615333.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.24568,69028,571,1231,72132,34956,87,133324,121,569086,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(E(((((((u1.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((u1.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1)))||(((u1.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=...1391
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(FwdU(Init,EX(E(((((((u1.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((u1.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1)))...1456
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t57, t93, t101, t170, t178, u0.t11, u0.t24, Intersection with reacha...228
(forward)formula 0,0,2.74915,69408,1,0,72132,43418,381,133324,715,569086,39320
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:55] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 148 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:55] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:37:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:37:55] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:37:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:37:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6378938010398044374.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 01:37:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16892112547917444619.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6378938010398044374.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16892112547917444619.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,17.1464,475732,2,58987,5,767172,6,0,466,804609,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX(AX(((SUR_PONT_B>=1)&&((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_...9530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(EX(!(((SUR_PONT_B>=1)&&((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTEN...6853
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
[2022-05-15 01:38:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-15 01:38:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:38:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4880348556484553896.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4880348556484553896.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4880348556484553896.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4880348556484553896.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4880348556484553896.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:38:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:38:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:38:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 493 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:38:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2022-05-15 01:38:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 58 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:38:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13451545856209474612.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:38:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11223529710863764853.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13451545856209474612.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11223529710863764853.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.77937,68208,571,1231,70876,36371,87,128132,121,550779,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX(AX(((u0.SUR_PONT_B>=1)&&((((((((((u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(u1.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((u1.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(u3.COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(...10853
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(EX(!(((u0.SUR_PONT_B>=1)&&((((((((((u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(u1.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&(...10914
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t57, t93, t101, t170, t178, u0.t11, u0.t24, Intersection with reacha...228
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 104 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned [12]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3458188806857682939.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 01:38:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5605893297880430697.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3458188806857682939.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5605893297880430697.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,17.8237,519224,2,138655,5,633428,6,0,465,843439,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(((AF(E((((((((CAPACITE>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(ATTENTE_B>=1)))||(((CAPACITE>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_A...2471
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(((!(EG(!(E((((((((CAPACITE>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(ATTENTE_B>=1)))||...1624
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
[2022-05-15 01:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2022-05-15 01:39:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17711156851908560347.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17711156851908560347.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17711156851908560347.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17711156851908560347.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17711156851908560347.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:39:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:39:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:39:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 604 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2022-05-15 01:39:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 119 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:39:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability264863475342852573.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:39:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2140371288853048785.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability264863475342852573.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2140371288853048785.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...252
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,28.6416,684288,2465,884,211868,9721,204,7.83895e+06,127,160316,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(((AF(E((((((((i2.u1.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i0.u3.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(i2.u5.ATTENTE_B>=1)))||(((i2.u1.CAPACITE>=...3215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(((!(EG(!(E((((((((i2.u1.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i0.u3.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&...880
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 112 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9565719678235386760.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:39:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14754103782858155581.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9565719678235386760.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14754103782858155581.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,17.5091,476624,2,58987,5,767172,6,0,466,804609,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((SUR_PONT_B>=1) * AX((((((((((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1)))||(((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A...10528
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(((SUR_PONT_B>=1) * !(EX(!((((((((((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A...9951
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 01:40:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-15 01:40:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:40:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3995842927186788881.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3995842927186788881.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3995842927186788881.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3995842927186788881.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3995842927186788881.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:40:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:40:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:40:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 592 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:40:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2022-05-15 01:40:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 97 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:40:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4887041892975548014.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:40:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8530148279328729848.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4887041892975548014.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8530148279328729848.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.55944,50888,1442,1010,35595,18576,132,205822,139,316965,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((i1.u1.SUR_PONT_B>=1) * AX((((((((((u3.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((u3.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1)))||(((u3.ROUTE...13357
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(((i1.u1.SUR_PONT_B>=1) * !(EX(!((((((((((u3.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((u3.ROUTE_A>=1)...13409
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t57, t80, t90, t179, t189, i0.t56, i1.u1.t11, i1.u1.t24, Intersection wit...236
(forward)formula 0,1,9.13733,197164,1,0,141636,51998,1284,1.13433e+06,898,1.26806e+06,108593
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:40:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:40:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 01:40:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 105 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:40:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:40:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:40:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:40:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:40:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:40:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:40:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-15 01:40:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2022-05-15 01:40:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:40:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 99 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 01:40:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-15 01:40:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:40:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16376861838780310937.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 01:40:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15707705360847290505.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16376861838780310937.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15707705360847290505.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,19.3768,502584,2,207776,5,393585,6,0,474,730624,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(E((EF((((CAPACITE>=10)&&(VIDANGE_2>=1))||((CAPACITE>=10)&&(VIDANGE_1>=1)))) * (((((((CAPACITE>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_...1700
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(ATTENTE_A>=1))&&((CAPACITE>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||(((NB_ATTE...2395
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 01:41:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:41:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9401714700417552341.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9401714700417552341.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9401714700417552341.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9401714700417552341.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9401714700417552341.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:41:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:41:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:41:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 531 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:41:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 133 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:41:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17997413925642709385.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14352921105173170669.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17997413925642709385.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14352921105173170669.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,11.2511,196512,2400,661,264771,10743,139,1.43487e+06,110,112115,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(E((EF((((i1.u1.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i2.u4.VIDANGE_2>=1))||((i1.u1.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i0.u3.VIDANGE_1>=1)))) * (((((((i1.u1.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i0...2210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!((((((((i0.u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(i0.u0.ATTENTE_A>=1))&&((i1.u1.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i2.u4.CONTRO...4347
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t57, t183, t189, i1.u1.t11, i1.u1.t24, i2.t68, i2.t58, Intersection ...238
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 43 transition count 286
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 41 transition count 284
Applied a total of 9 rules in 46 ms. Remains 41 /46 variables (removed 5) and now considering 284/288 (removed 4) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned [12, 26]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/46 places, 284/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 39 /39 variables (removed 0) and now considering 284/284 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 39/46 places, 284/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 284 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15793481335990269049.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14727923717817281589.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15793481335990269049.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14727923717817281589.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,63294,1.83721,58824,2,9065,5,101328,6,0,441,108381,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((AG(((((((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1)))||(((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1))||((ROUTE_A>...9502
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((!(E(TRUE U !(((((((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1)))||(((...9565
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58,...1394
(forward)formula 0,0,14.6115,361444,1,0,838,1.06712e+06,565,262,4103,1.05997e+06,662
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 111 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14061314975047019743.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:41:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5529866526034800561.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14061314975047019743.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5529866526034800561.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,22.2811,553452,2,59968,5,819856,6,0,461,1.03138e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 01:42:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:42:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14740210285849254635.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14740210285849254635.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14740210285849254635.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14740210285849254635.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14740210285849254635.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:42:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:42:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:42:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 493 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:42:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 58 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:42:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability58698361296548529.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10430960360995381449.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability58698361296548529.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10430960360995381449.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...252
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.29829,37492,751,936,27253,19338,87,71372,119,318260,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((((u1.CHOIX_1<1)||(u0.COMPTEUR_10<1))&&((u1.CHOIX_2<1)||(u0.COMPTEUR_10<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(((u1.CHOIX_1<1)||(u0.COMPTEUR_10<1))&&((u1.CHOIX_2<1)||(u0.COMPTEUR_10<1))))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,23.1295,487292,1,0,448060,146533,309,1.48275e+06,595,5.14914e+06,273397
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 43 transition count 286
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 41 transition count 284
Applied a total of 9 rules in 40 ms. Remains 41 /46 variables (removed 5) and now considering 284/288 (removed 4) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned [12, 26]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/46 places, 284/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 39 /39 variables (removed 0) and now considering 284/284 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 39/46 places, 284/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 284 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14316194296848248802.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4331761811289350086.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14316194296848248802.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4331761811289350086.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,63294,1.80946,59152,2,9065,5,101328,6,0,441,108381,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1)))||(((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1))||((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(N...448
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1)))||(((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_AT...491
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,9.21294,234972,1,0,109,766285,12,2,2557,482867,106
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 101 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned [28]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:42:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1154956634219807541.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 01:42:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5178124044097726132.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1154956634219807541.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5178124044097726132.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,22.7875,568196,2,146352,5,717768,6,0,465,1.03246e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 01:43:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:43:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:43:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2486684675368890275.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2486684675368890275.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2486684675368890275.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2486684675368890275.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2486684675368890275.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:43:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:43:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:43:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 512 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:43:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2022-05-15 01:43:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 105 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:43:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3140960014329626500.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:43:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9294194140401077045.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3140960014329626500.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9294194140401077045.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,6.87021,92576,2445,992,80863,15321,126,289469,139,303517,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(((i0.u2.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i1.u1.COMPTEUR_2>=1))) * ((((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i1.u3.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&...280
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(((i0.u2.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i1.u1.COMPTEUR_2>=1))))) * ((((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i1.u3.CONTR...331
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t24, t55, t56, t99, t100, i0.u2.t11, i1.t265, i1.t262, Intersection with reach...229
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 110 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned [28]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13734521595388971639.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:43:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12504612809410529640.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13734521595388971639.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12504612809410529640.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,23.3865,567112,2,146352,5,717768,6,0,465,1.03246e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 01:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-15 01:44:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2931477152409729565.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2931477152409729565.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2931477152409729565.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2931477152409729565.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2931477152409729565.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:44:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:44:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:44:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 512 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2022-05-15 01:44:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 105 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:44:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7219890600498221061.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:44:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability556677774690817936.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7219890600498221061.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability556677774690817936.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...252
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,9.32425,102548,2445,992,81201,15686,126,293482,139,304686,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AX(EX(AF((((u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u4.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(i1.u1.COMPTEUR_5>=1)))))) + EX((!((EF((((u4.NB_ATT...634
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,(!(EX(!(EX(!(EG(!((((u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u4.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(i1...705
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t24, t55, t56, t99, t100, i0.u2.t11, i1.t265, i1.t262, Intersection with reach...229
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:44:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:44:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 01:44:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 92 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:44:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:44:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 01:44:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:44:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:44:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:44:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:44:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:44:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:44:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:44:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:44:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:44:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:44:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9545539270104738910.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 01:44:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6720449106186815076.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9545539270104738910.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6720449106186815076.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,23.0808,553712,2,59968,5,819856,6,0,461,1.03138e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 01:45:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2022-05-15 01:45:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:45:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9533895041644144070.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9533895041644144070.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9533895041644144070.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9533895041644144070.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9533895041644144070.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:45:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:45:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:45:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 551 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:45:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-15 01:45:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 97 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:45:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16429762605008274678.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:45:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8897440522461508060.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16429762605008274678.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8897440522461508060.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.08662,55372,1106,736,46921,16305,160,141320,141,292602,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((AF(((A(((i1.u0.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i1.u2.COMPTEUR_6>=1)) U (((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i1.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i0.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_8>...529
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i1.u2.COMPTEUR_7>=1)) * ((i1.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1)&&(i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_B_1>=1))) * (i1.u0.N...834
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t24, t56, t141, t144, t196, t199, i0.u1.t11, i1.t78, i1.t72, i1.t55, Intersect...243
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 99 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned [28]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1336493510230594648.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:45:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13502646232631014463.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1336493510230594648.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13502646232631014463.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,23.6436,568252,2,146352,5,717768,6,0,465,1.03246e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 01:46:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-15 01:46:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:46:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9376192097178021617.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9376192097178021617.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9376192097178021617.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9376192097178021617.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9376192097178021617.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:46:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:46:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:46:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 512 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:46:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2022-05-15 01:46:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 105 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:46:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8493296518242049376.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-15 01:46:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5652830107825723732.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8493296518242049376.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5652830107825723732.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,7.11231,91972,2445,992,83548,15412,126,296449,139,297042,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(!((((EG((((u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u4.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(i1.u1.COMPTEUR_6>=1)))) * AF(((i0.u2.CHOIX_1>=1)&&...1057
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU(FwdU(Init,E(!((((EG((((u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u4.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(i1.u1.C...1140
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t24, t55, t56, t99, t100, i0.u2.t11, i1.t265, i1.t262, Intersection with reach...229
(forward)formula 0,0,9.00837,91972,1,0,83548,31855,528,381296,796,297042,49724
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:46:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:46:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 01:46:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 105 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:46:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:46:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:46:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:46:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:46:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:46:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:46:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:46:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:46:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:46:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:46:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:46:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:46:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11467775225780938188.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:46:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14731888584361937595.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11467775225780938188.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14731888584361937595.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,22.9431,553772,2,59968,5,819856,6,0,461,1.03138e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 01:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:47:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1424749422453324304.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1424749422453324304.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1424749422453324304.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1424749422453324304.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1424749422453324304.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:47:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:47:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:47:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 561 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2022-05-15 01:47:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 96 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:47:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9114627283007800562.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:47:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10991321519475815546.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9114627283007800562.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10991321519475815546.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.77846,73132,2023,972,60339,17978,159,343140,140,308209,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(AG(((((u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_10>=1)&&(u3.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i0.u0.COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||((!((u3.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(u3.NB_...497
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((((i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i0.u2.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i2.u4.NB_...1817
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t24, t56, t90, t100, t178, t188, i0.t166, i0.t156, i0.t55, i2.u1.t11, Intersec...244
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 97 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned [12]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12303217663337278723.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:47:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7300919446883978640.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12303217663337278723.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7300919446883978640.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,18.8942,517112,2,138655,5,633428,6,0,465,843439,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 01:48:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-15 01:48:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:48:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10825655743455220590.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10825655743455220590.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10825655743455220590.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10825655743455220590.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10825655743455220590.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:48:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:48:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:48:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 569 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:48:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-15 01:48:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 123 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:48:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1500280978244203621.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:48:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7876461333750550819.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1500280978244203621.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7876461333750550819.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,29.6395,629248,2978,986,205905,12734,175,7.13863e+06,129,108943,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 91 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned [28]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11284522689991918600.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:48:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7590412523259584010.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11284522689991918600.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7590412523259584010.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,23.5649,569048,2,146352,5,717768,6,0,465,1.03246e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 01:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-15 01:49:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph412332378655903979.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph412332378655903979.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph412332378655903979.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph412332378655903979.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph412332378655903979.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:49:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:49:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:49:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 512 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-15 01:49:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 105 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:49:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12112719315031350907.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:49:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15647233073902369528.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12112719315031350907.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15647233073902369528.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,8.43163,93932,2499,992,71460,15610,127,277109,139,293612,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((AG(((AF((((i1.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_5>=1)&&(i1.u2.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u2.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i1.u4.COMPTEUR_9>=1)))) * A((((u3.NB_AT...1387
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((((i1.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(i1.u2.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u2.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1...3099
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t24, t55, t56, t137, t144, i0.u1.t11, i1.t265, i1.t256, Intersection with reac...230
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 90 ms found 0 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned [28]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11377954680814438425.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 01:49:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13524985097279256724.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11377954680814438425.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13524985097279256724.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,23.0055,568448,2,146352,5,717768,6,0,465,1.03246e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(A((AF((((NB_ATTENTE_A_2>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_4>=1)))) + AX(FALSE)) U (((!((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(...1680
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(!((E(!((((!((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_5>=1)))) + ...2415
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
[2022-05-15 01:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-15 01:50:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14923154425156231007.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14923154425156231007.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14923154425156231007.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14923154425156231007.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14923154425156231007.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:50:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:50:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:50:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 512 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-15 01:50:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 105 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:50:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13199068267337519752.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:50:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5512464060717353712.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13199068267337519752.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5512464060717353712.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,7.14042,93500,2445,992,82241,15341,126,295635,139,297685,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(A((AF((((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_2>=1)&&(i1.u3.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i1.u1.COMPTEUR_4>=1)))) + AX(FALSE)) U (((!(...2055
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(!((E(!((((!((((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i1.u3.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i1...3204
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t24, t55, t56, t99, t100, i0.u2.t11, i1.t265, i1.t262, Intersection with reach...229
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 01:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-15 01:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2022-05-15 01:50:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-15 01:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1062772962088243830.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1062772962088243830.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1062772962088243830.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1062772962088243830.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1062772962088243830.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-15 01:50:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-15 01:50:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-15 01:50:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 531 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-15 01:50:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2022-05-15 01:50:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 133 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-15 01:50:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9479830856627763448.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 01:50:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13072415090498118559.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9479830856627763448.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13072415090498118559.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,69.9564,1502228,6995,825,294981,11885,126,1.92215e+07,110,141026,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX(AX(((i2.u1.SUR_PONT_B>=1)&&((((((((((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i0.u2.COMP...12176
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(EX(!(((i2.u1.SUR_PONT_B>=1)&&((((((((((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_...12237
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t57, t128, t134, i0.t200, i0.t193, i2.u1.t11, i2.u1.t24, Intersectio...240
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,441.496,2375540,1,0,1.1736e+06,20307,327,2.64994e+07,367,141026,374914
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(AX(((AF(E((((((((i2.u1.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(i1.u3.ATTENTE_B>=1)))||(((i2.u1.CAPACITE>=...3215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(((!(EG(!(E((((((((i2.u1.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&...3272
dead was empty
(forward)formula 1,1,516.669,2364876,1,0,1.1736e+06,20307,526,2.83471e+07,444,193046,493827
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EX(A(E((EF((((i2.u1.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i1.u5.VIDANGE_2>=1))||((i2.u1.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i0.u4.VIDANGE_1>=1)))) * (((((((i2.u1.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i0...2210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!((((((((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(i2.u0.ATTENTE_A>=1))&&((i2.u1.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i1.u5.CONTRO...4347
(forward)formula 2,0,564.429,2383880,1,0,1.1736e+06,21040,664,3.01066e+07,451,210613,618735
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((AX(((i2.u1.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i0.u2.COMPTEUR_2>=1))) * ((((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&...283
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(((i2.u1.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i0.u2.COMPTEUR_2>=1))))) * ((((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTR...334
(forward)formula 3,0,567.826,2394440,1,0,1.1736e+06,21451,693,3.02136e+07,455,212753,636598
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-15 02:15:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 02:15:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2070603734594486102.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 02:15:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13014321142314942258.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2070603734594486102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13014321142314942258.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,19.5173,504532,2,207776,5,393585,6,0,474,730624,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AX(EX(AF((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_5>=1)))))) + EX((!((EF((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(CON...532
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,(!(EX(!(EX(!(EG(!((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_5>...603
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t11, t22, t23, t24, t25, t56, t57, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t70,...1304
(forward)formula 0,0,239.436,4722264,1,0,1842,6.63063e+06,25,762,1483,9.23424e+06,17
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((((AF(((A(((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_6>=1)) U (((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_8>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_3>=1)))) * AX((...421
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (COMPTEUR_7>=1)) * ((CONTROLEUR_1>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_1>=1))) * (NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)) * !(E...678
(forward)formula 1,0,260.587,4722264,1,0,1842,6.63063e+06,35,762,1496,9.23424e+06,153
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(EX(AG(((((NB_ATTENTE_A_10>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||((!((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1)))&&((...410
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(...1490
(forward)formula 2,0,283.064,4722264,1,0,1842,6.63063e+06,46,762,1532,9.23424e+06,696
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E((((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_5>=1)) + (AG(((!(((NB_ATTENTE_B_6>=1)&&(ROUTE_B>=1))) * AX((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((NB_AT...671
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,(((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_5>=1)) + (!(E(TRUE U !(((!(((NB_ATTENTE_B_6>=1)&&(ROUTE_B>=1))) * !(EX(...753
(forward)formula 3,0,288.137,4722264,1,0,1842,6.63063e+06,63,762,1751,9.23424e+06,1168
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG((((AG(((AF((((NB_ATTENTE_A_5>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_9>=1)))) * A((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_...1114
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((((NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1...2523
(forward)formula 4,0,300.015,4722264,1,0,2289,6.63063e+06,95,1204,1799,9.23424e+06,2589
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (E(A((AF((((NB_ATTENTE_A_2>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_4>=1)))) + AX(FALSE)) U (((!((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(...1680
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(!((E(!((((!((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_5>=1)))) + ...2637
(forward)formula 5,0,336.186,4726616,1,0,2567,7.2616e+06,108,1396,1911,1.03796e+07,2779
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 2616417 ms.

BK_STOP 1652581246747

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r024-tall-165251918200170"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10.tgz
mv BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;