Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r006-tajo-165245689300450.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-06a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r006-tajo-165245689300450
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 264K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K Apr 30 01:37 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K Apr 30 01:37 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K Apr 30 01:34 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K Apr 30 01:34 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 9 07:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 9 07:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 9 07:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 9 07:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 9 07:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 07:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 10 09:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652661413400

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-16 00:36:54] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-16 00:36:54] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-16 00:36:54] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 77 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:54] [INFO ] Transformed 157 places.
[2022-05-16 00:36:54] [INFO ] Transformed 155 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:36:54] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-16 00:36:54] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 157 places and 155 transitions in 184 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 30 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 30 transitions.
Support contains 100 out of 157 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 157 /157 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 157 cols
[2022-05-16 00:36:55] [INFO ] Computed 40 place invariants in 13 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 232 ms returned [45, 48, 57, 60, 124, 136, 142, 148]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 262 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/157 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 149 /149 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 149/157 places, 125/125 transitions.
Support contains 100 out of 149 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-16 00:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 290 resets, run finished after 612 ms. (steps per millisecond=16 ) properties (out of 80) seen :66
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 31 resets, run finished after 51 ms. (steps per millisecond=196 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 59 ms. (steps per millisecond=169 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 60 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 32 resets, run finished after 41 ms. (steps per millisecond=243 ) properties (out of 14) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=384 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 35 resets, run finished after 54 ms. (steps per millisecond=185 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 35 resets, run finished after 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=312 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=384 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=312 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 33 resets, run finished after 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=312 ) properties (out of 13) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 33 resets, run finished after 29 ms. (steps per millisecond=344 ) properties (out of 12) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 35 resets, run finished after 33 ms. (steps per millisecond=303 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 33 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=357 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 11 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 149 cols
[2022-05-16 00:36:56] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 00:36:56] [INFO ] After 179ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :3 sat :0 real:8
[2022-05-16 00:36:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] After 72ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :6
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] After 56ms SMT Verify possible using 26 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :6
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] After 123ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :6
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 47 ms.
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] After 331ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :6
Fused 11 Parikh solutions to 6 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 13 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 149 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 149 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 133 transition count 109
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 133 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 122 transition count 98
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 119 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 119 transition count 95
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 108 transition count 84
Free-agglomeration rule applied 12 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 108 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 96 transition count 72
Applied a total of 106 rules in 36 ms. Remains 96 /149 variables (removed 53) and now considering 72/125 (removed 53) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 96/149 places, 72/125 transitions.
Finished random walk after 7046 steps, including 2 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=503 )
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Support contains 83 out of 149 places (down from 85) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 146 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 146 transition count 122
Applied a total of 6 rules in 10 ms. Remains 146 /149 variables (removed 3) and now considering 122/125 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 146 cols
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 52, 88, 114, 125, 143, 145]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 83 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/149 places, 122/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 129 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 129 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 128 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 128 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 127 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 127 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 126 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 126 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 125 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 125 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 124 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 124 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 123 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 123 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 122 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 122 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 121 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 121 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 120 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 120 transition count 109
Applied a total of 26 rules in 28 ms. Remains 120 /133 variables (removed 13) and now considering 109/122 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 120 cols
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 120 cols
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 120/149 places, 109/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 120/149 places, 109/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15126593097538248801.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:36:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5512518990253348434.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15126593097538248801.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5512518990253348434.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19353e+09,0.341217,19308,2,2029,5,51016,6,0,591,89899,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(EF(((p32==1)&&(p116==1)))) U ((!(EX((p103==1))) * (p56==1)) * (p12==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,EG(E(TRUE U ((p32==1)&&(p116==1))))) * (p12==1)) * (p56==1)) * !(EX((p103==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t88, t97, Intersection with r...234
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 00:37:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:37:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 00:37:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5343963151231070608.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5343963151231070608.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5343963151231070608.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5343963151231070608.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5343963151231070608.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 00:37:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 00:37:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 00:37:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:37:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2022-05-16 00:37:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-16 00:37:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5603701379123110371.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:37:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8752072038695602214.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5603701379123110371.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8752072038695602214.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19353e+09,0.0388,5880,181,14,2246,126,255,2505,23,255,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(EF(((i10.u9.p32==1)&&(i10.u37.p116==1)))) U ((!(EX((i6.i1.u21.p103==1))) * (i10.u16.p56==1)) * (i12.u3.p12==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,EG(E(TRUE U ((i10.u9.p32==1)&&(i10.u37.p116==1))))) * (i12.u3.p12==1)) * (i10.u16.p56==1)) * !(EX(...187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t88, u0.t29, u10.t9, i1.u2.t25, i1.u4.t21, i2.u5.t19, i3.u7.t15, i4.u6.t17, i4.u8.t13, i6.i0....326
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,11.5814,309248,1,0,609813,126,1687,893313,111,255,879025
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 147 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 147 transition count 123
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 147 /149 variables (removed 2) and now considering 123/125 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 147 cols
[2022-05-16 00:37:39] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:37:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned [7, 49, 52, 144]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 133 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 143/149 places, 123/125 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 142 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 142 transition count 122
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 142 /143 variables (removed 1) and now considering 122/123 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 142 cols
[2022-05-16 00:37:39] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:37:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 142 cols
[2022-05-16 00:37:39] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:37:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:37:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 298 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 142/149 places, 122/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 142/149 places, 122/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:37:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:37:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:37:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:37:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:37:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:37:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16492114188754111521.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:37:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3853041364001842895.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16492114188754111521.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3853041364001842895.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26988e+09,0.688039,32392,2,9105,5,103573,6,0,682,125224,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((E((((p19==1)&&(p73==1))||((p118==1)&&(p155==1))) U ((EF(((p92==1)&&(p155==1))) + ((p35==1)&&(p84==1))) + (p78==1))) + !(EG(AF(((p130...466
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((E((((p19==1)&&(p73==1))||((p118==1)&&(p155==1))) U ((E(TRUE U ((p92==1)&&(p155==1))) + ((p35==1)&...707
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t110, t111, Intersection with reac...232
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 00:38:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 00:38:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15137057575484994080.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15137057575484994080.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15137057575484994080.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15137057575484994080.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15137057575484994080.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 00:38:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 00:38:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 00:38:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 17 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:38:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-16 00:38:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14137825170800749710.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6515163446072136575.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14137825170800749710.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6515163446072136575.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26988e+09,0.057244,6264,245,62,3185,1362,388,3678,68,1810,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((E((((i2.i1.u5.p19==1)&&(i3.i0.u24.p73==1))||((i6.u55.p118==1)&&(i6.u55.p155==1))) U ((EF(((i6.u55.p92==1)&&(i6.u55.p155==1))) + ((i7...734
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((E((((i2.i1.u5.p19==1)&&(i3.i0.u24.p73==1))||((i6.u55.p118==1)&&(i6.u55.p155==1))) U ((E(TRUE U ((...1069
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u6.t17, i0.i0.u3.t23, i1.u7.t15, i2.i1.u5.t19, i4.u2.t25, i4.u4.t21, i5.u8.t13, i5.u11.t9, i6...326
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,2.42321,92304,1,0,196324,1878,2808,217645,422,3648,264728
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 146 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 146 transition count 122
Applied a total of 6 rules in 10 ms. Remains 146 /149 variables (removed 3) and now considering 122/125 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 146 cols
[2022-05-16 00:38:12] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 49, 88, 114, 125, 143, 145]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 97 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/149 places, 122/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 131 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 131 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 130 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 130 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 129 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 129 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 128 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 128 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 127 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 127 transition count 114
Applied a total of 16 rules in 15 ms. Remains 127 /135 variables (removed 8) and now considering 114/122 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 127 cols
[2022-05-16 00:38:12] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 127 cols
[2022-05-16 00:38:13] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:38:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 271 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 127/149 places, 114/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 127/149 places, 114/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10782025432560214839.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16054071214118547858.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10782025432560214839.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16054071214118547858.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19484e+09,0.354514,17696,2,1958,5,43322,6,0,620,79291,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(((AX(((p35==1)&&(p66==1))) + (p54==0)) + (p141==0))) * ((AX(((p103==0)&&((p27==0)||(p77==0)))) + EG((p73==0))) + !(E(((p6==1)||(p2...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(((!(EX(!(((p35==1)&&(p66==1))))) + (p54==0)) + (p141==0))) * ((!(EX(!(((p103==0)&&((p27==0)||(p77...255
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t47, t61, Intersection with r...234
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 00:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 00:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13299104160548967390.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13299104160548967390.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13299104160548967390.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13299104160548967390.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13299104160548967390.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 00:38:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 00:38:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 00:38:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 00:38:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9321535760333141565.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2384290585897037957.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9321535760333141565.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2384290585897037957.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19484e+09,0.045987,6656,224,19,3941,148,295,5659,31,292,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(((AX(((i3.u20.p35==1)&&(i4.i0.u21.p66==1))) + (i12.i0.u16.p54==0)) + (i11.u33.p141==0))) * ((AX(((i8.i0.u36.p103==0)&&((i12.i1.u7....305
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(((!(EX(!(((i3.u20.p35==1)&&(i4.i0.u21.p66==1))))) + (i12.i0.u16.p54==0)) + (i11.u33.p141==0))) * ...366
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t47, t61, i0.u3.t23, i1.u5.t19, i2.u10.t9, i2.u11.t7, i3.u19.t43, i6.u2.t25, i6.u4.t21, i7.u6...321
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,3.05218,113492,1,0,227337,222,1959,311705,159,502,267613
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 147 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 147 transition count 123
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 147 /149 variables (removed 2) and now considering 123/125 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 147 cols
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 12 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 173 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 52, 88, 114, 125, 144]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 175 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/149 places, 123/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 131 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 131 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 130 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 130 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 129 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 129 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 128 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 128 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 127 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 127 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 126 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 126 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 125 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 125 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 124 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 124 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 123 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 123 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 122 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 122 transition count 110
Applied a total of 26 rules in 16 ms. Remains 122 /135 variables (removed 13) and now considering 110/123 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 122 cols
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 122 cols
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 122/149 places, 110/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 122/149 places, 110/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1725544085634336408.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:38:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6129154241846564846.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1725544085634336408.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6129154241846564846.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.22754e+09,0.711287,25396,2,3597,5,69449,6,0,600,121023,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(((EF((((p46==1)&&(p128==1))&&(p37==1))) * (p32==1)) * (p116==1))) * A((((!((p12==1)||(p59==1)))&&(!(((p34==1)&&(p145==1))||((p131=...203
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((E(TRUE U (((p46==1)&&(p128==1))&&(p37==1))) * (p32==1)) * (p116==1)))))) * !(EG(!((p13==...308
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t88, t97, Intersection with r...234
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 00:39:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 00:39:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4355959553276716858.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4355959553276716858.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4355959553276716858.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4355959553276716858.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4355959553276716858.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 00:39:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 00:39:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 00:39:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 00:39:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability772116912588743641.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8312712427009757338.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability772116912588743641.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8312712427009757338.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...252
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.22754e+09,0.114275,10096,201,20,11018,235,249,17879,36,384,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(((EF((((i9.i1.u13.p46==1)&&(i9.i1.u40.p128==1))&&(u10.p37==1))) * (i2.i0.u9.p32==1)) * (i2.i0.u36.p116==1))) * A((((!((i9.i0.u3.p1...309
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((E(TRUE U (((i9.i1.u13.p46==1)&&(i9.i1.u40.p128==1))&&(u10.p37==1))) * (i2.i0.u9.p32==1))...432
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t97, u0.t29, u10.t9, i1.u6.t17, i1.u8.t13, i2.i0.u9.t11, i3.i0.u18.t43, i3.i1.t88, i5.u2.t25,...327
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.70911,67764,1,0,136353,304,1727,174574,189,586,156291
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 146 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 146 transition count 122
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 146 /149 variables (removed 3) and now considering 122/125 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 146 cols
[2022-05-16 00:39:18] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned [7, 14, 28, 35, 42, 52, 88, 114, 125, 143, 145]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 117 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/149 places, 122/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 131 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 131 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 130 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 130 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 129 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 129 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 128 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 128 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 127 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 127 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 126 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 126 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 125 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 125 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 124 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 124 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 123 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 123 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 122 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 122 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 121 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 121 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 120 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 120 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 119 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 119 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 118 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 118 transition count 105
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 117 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 117 transition count 104
Applied a total of 36 rules in 23 ms. Remains 117 /135 variables (removed 18) and now considering 104/122 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 117 cols
[2022-05-16 00:39:18] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 117 cols
[2022-05-16 00:39:18] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:39:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 117/149 places, 104/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 117/149 places, 104/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:39:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:39:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15706202777613560205.gal : 14 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16120031367722017901.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15706202777613560205.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16120031367722017901.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19222e+09,0.305342,15988,2,1917,5,39545,6,0,570,68327,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AF(AG(((p51==1)&&(p135==1)))) * A(!(EX(((p21==1)&&(p108==1)))) U EX((p3==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p51==1)&&(p135==1))))))))) * !(EG(!(EX((p3==1)))))) * !(E(!(EX((p3==...225
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t61, t91, Intersection with r...234
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 00:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 00:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7694538760700334821.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7694538760700334821.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7694538760700334821.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7694538760700334821.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7694538760700334821.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 00:39:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 00:39:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 00:39:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 00:39:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10980844830237769855.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13182777415239549410.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10980844830237769855.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13182777415239549410.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19222e+09,0.152711,12276,200,19,16373,150,276,23101,31,246,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AF(AG(((i3.i1.u15.p51==1)&&(i13.u47.p135==1)))) * A(!(EX(((i5.i1.u27.p21==1)&&(i8.u32.p108==1)))) U EX((i6.u0.p3==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i3.i1.u15.p51==1)&&(i13.u47.p135==1))))))))) * !(EG(!(EX((i6.u0.p3==...278
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t61, u10.t9, i0.u2.t25, i0.u4.t21, i1.u9.t11, i2.u11.t7, i3.i0.u5.t19, i5.i0.t91, i5.i1.u19.t...326
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.76053,77600,1,0,168506,241,1745,191879,155,534,206131
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 140 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 103 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 102 transition count 86
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 102 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 82 transition count 72
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 82 transition count 66
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 76 transition count 66
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 73 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 73 transition count 63
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 61 transition count 51
Applied a total of 160 rules in 32 ms. Remains 61 /149 variables (removed 88) and now considering 51/125 (removed 74) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 61 cols
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [33, 41, 48, 58, 60]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/149 places, 51/125 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 56 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 55 transition count 50
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 52 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 52 transition count 47
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 51 transition count 46
Applied a total of 10 rules in 8 ms. Remains 51 /56 variables (removed 5) and now considering 46/51 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 51 cols
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 51 cols
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 51/149 places, 46/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 51/149 places, 46/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7346608365763830701.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4642820949750621101.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7346608365763830701.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4642820949750621101.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,110592,0.011894,4728,2,183,5,1247,6,0,253,1136,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((p68==0)) + EF(((p32==1)&&(p116==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(p68==0))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),TRUE) * ((p32==1)&&(p116==1)))] != FALSE)
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 44/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.028627,5752,1,0,8,4731,19,3,1202,2447,8
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 146 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 146 transition count 122
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 146 /149 variables (removed 3) and now considering 122/125 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 146 cols
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 52, 88, 114, 125, 143]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 104 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 134/149 places, 122/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 131 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 131 transition count 119
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 131 /134 variables (removed 3) and now considering 119/122 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 131 cols
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 131 cols
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 131/149 places, 119/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 131/149 places, 119/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11688538124887894256.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:39:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3179507824884602699.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11688538124887894256.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3179507824884602699.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19887e+09,0.52383,25604,2,2112,5,67977,6,0,645,131938,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p93==1)&&(p156==1)) U ((p79==1) + (E(EF(((p9==1)||(p17==1))) U (p77==1)) * EX((AX((p19==1)) + !(A((p16==1) U (p33==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,((p93==1)&&(p156==1))) * (p79==1))] != FALSE + ([(EY((FwdU(Init,((p93==1)&&(p156==1))) * E(E(TRUE U...490
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 108/10/11
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t109, Intersection with reach...231
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 117/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,11.6273,264156,1,0,546,1.55169e+06,285,400,4085,1.49764e+06,638
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 147 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 147 transition count 123
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 147 /149 variables (removed 2) and now considering 123/125 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 147 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 49, 52, 88, 114, 125, 144]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 120 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 136/149 places, 123/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 132 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 132 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 131 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 131 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 130 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 130 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 129 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 129 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 128 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 128 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 127 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 127 transition count 114
Applied a total of 18 rules in 8 ms. Remains 127 /136 variables (removed 9) and now considering 114/123 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 127 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 127 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 176 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 127/149 places, 114/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 127/149 places, 114/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10189415301848648394.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5841776993192141325.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10189415301848648394.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5841776993192141325.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.22859e+09,0.555453,24064,2,2758,5,62767,6,0,622,113032,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((!(A(((p137==1)&&(p156==1)) U (p24==1))) * AX(((p42==0)||(p67==0)))) * EF(((p42==0)||(p67==0))))) + EF((p74==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,((!(!((E(!((p24==1)) U (!(((p137==1)&&(p156==1))) * !((p24==1)))) + EG(!((p24==1)))))) * !(EX(!(((p4...263
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t48, t61, Intersection with r...234
(forward)formula 0,1,14.1702,297568,1,0,762,1.96225e+06,267,386,3739,1.62414e+06,859
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 146 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 146 transition count 122
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 146 /149 variables (removed 3) and now considering 122/125 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 146 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:17] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned [14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 52, 88, 114, 125, 143, 145]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/149 places, 122/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 131 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 131 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 130 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 130 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 129 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 129 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 128 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 128 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 127 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 127 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 126 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 126 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 125 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 125 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 124 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 124 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 123 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 123 transition count 110
Applied a total of 24 rules in 13 ms. Remains 123 /135 variables (removed 12) and now considering 110/122 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 123 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 13 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 123 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 204 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 123/149 places, 110/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 123/149 places, 110/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2275523593611296534.gal : 14 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17621020238154835467.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2275523593611296534.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17621020238154835467.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19379e+09,0.706158,23184,2,1936,5,57365,6,0,600,115715,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX(EF((p105==1))) + ((EF((((p10==0)||(p7==0))||(p106==0))) * AG(((p22==1)&&(p89==1)))) * ((p34==0) * (EF(((p53==1)||((p74==1)&&(p26==...224
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(EY(Init)),TRUE) * (p105==1))] != FALSE + ([(FwdU(((EY(Init) * (E(TRUE U (((p10==0)||(p7==0))||(p106==...510
(forward)formula 0,1,2.01963,56256,1,0,9,155178,9,1,1180,339560,5
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 149 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 133 transition count 109
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 133 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 122 transition count 98
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 119 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 119 transition count 95
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 108 transition count 84
Applied a total of 82 rules in 9 ms. Remains 108 /149 variables (removed 41) and now considering 84/125 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [6, 11, 16, 21, 26, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 60, 80, 89, 105, 107]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/149 places, 84/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 31 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 31 transitions
Performed 31 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 31
Iterating post reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 90 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 59 transition count 53
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 55 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 55 transition count 49
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 54 transition count 48
Applied a total of 72 rules in 3 ms. Remains 54 /90 variables (removed 36) and now considering 48/84 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 11 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 54/149 places, 48/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 54/149 places, 48/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 48 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 479 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=384 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 59 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=1428 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 39425 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 102 ms. (steps per millisecond=386 )
Probabilistic random walk after 39425 steps, saw 7579 distinct states, run finished after 102 ms. (steps per millisecond=386 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 147 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 147 transition count 123
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 147 /149 variables (removed 2) and now considering 123/125 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 147 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 49, 52, 88, 114, 125, 144]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 152 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 136/149 places, 123/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 132 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 132 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 131 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 131 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 130 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 130 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 129 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 129 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 128 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 128 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 127 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 127 transition count 114
Applied a total of 18 rules in 16 ms. Remains 127 /136 variables (removed 9) and now considering 114/123 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 127 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 127 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:20] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:40:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 192 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 127/149 places, 114/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 127/149 places, 114/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:40:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:40:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12874740974173402264.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3601593300742202507.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12874740974173402264.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3601593300742202507.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.22859e+09,0.585867,20368,2,2303,5,53023,6,0,622,93516,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EX((EF(EX(((p143==1)&&(p156==1)))) + (p26==1))) U AF((AG(A((p12==1) U ((p42==1)&&(p67==1)))) * !((((p75!=1)&&(p12==1))&&(p6==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((p42==1)&&(p67==1))) U (!((p12==1)) * !(((p42==1)&&(p67==1)))))...663
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t48, t61, Intersection with r...234
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 00:40:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 00:40:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2855787493721746823.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2855787493721746823.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2855787493721746823.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2855787493721746823.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2855787493721746823.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 00:40:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 00:40:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 00:40:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:40:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2022-05-16 00:40:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13621603040690830304.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6214010683305320689.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13621603040690830304.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6214010683305320689.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.22859e+09,0.040545,6888,234,21,3818,190,271,5746,37,328,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EX((EF(EX(((u50.p143==1)&&(u50.p156==1)))) + (i11.u7.p26==1))) U AF((AG(A((i10.i0.u3.p12==1) U ((i2.u20.p42==1)&&(i3.i0.u21.p67==1)))...223
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((i2.u20.p42==1)&&(i3.i0.u21.p67==1))) U (!((i10.i0.u3.p12==1)) ...939
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t48, t61, u0.t29, i0.u5.t19, i2.u18.t43, i5.u2.t25, i5.u4.t21, i6.u6.t17, i6.u8.t13, i8.u9.t1...319
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,1,1.12198,48336,1,0,90404,359,1971,135433,189,745,122089
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 146 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 146 transition count 122
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 146 /149 variables (removed 3) and now considering 122/125 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 146 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 52, 88, 114, 125, 143, 145]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 124 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/149 places, 122/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 129 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 129 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 128 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 128 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 127 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 127 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 126 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 126 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 125 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 125 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 124 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 124 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 123 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 123 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 122 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 122 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 121 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 121 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 120 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 120 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 119 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 119 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 118 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 118 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 117 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 117 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 116 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 116 transition count 105
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 115 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 115 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 114 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 114 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 113 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 113 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 112 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 112 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 111 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 111 transition count 100
Applied a total of 44 rules in 33 ms. Remains 111 /133 variables (removed 22) and now considering 100/122 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 111 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 111 cols
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 111/149 places, 100/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 111/149 places, 100/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18419751793395359133.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:40:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15392811613845681842.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18419751793395359133.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15392811613845681842.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19117e+09,0.273338,17492,2,1685,5,43974,6,0,546,79756,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX(E(!(EG(((p43==1)&&(p122==1)))) U (p59==1))) + EF(((p38==1)&&(p150==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p38==1)&&(p150==1)))))) * !(E(!(EG(((p43==1)&&(p122==1)))) U (p59==1))))] =...161
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t43, t49, t61, Intersection with r...234
(forward)formula 0,0,7.30386,179208,1,0,375,1.09132e+06,229,206,3275,754830,520
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 149 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 133 transition count 109
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 133 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 123 transition count 99
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 120 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 120 transition count 96
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 110 transition count 86
Applied a total of 78 rules in 9 ms. Remains 110 /149 variables (removed 39) and now considering 86/125 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 110 cols
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned [5, 10, 15, 26, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 61, 81, 90, 109]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 114 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/149 places, 86/125 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 94 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 79 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 74 transition count 66
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 74 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 68 transition count 60
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 65 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 65 transition count 57
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 64 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 64 transition count 56
Applied a total of 60 rules in 8 ms. Remains 64 /94 variables (removed 30) and now considering 56/86 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 64 cols
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 64 cols
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 64/149 places, 56/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 64/149 places, 56/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3927903393343710372.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16961987437534605869.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3927903393343710372.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16961987437534605869.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,550913,0.055044,5616,2,879,5,5116,6,0,312,6155,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(E(AF(!(((p154==1)&&(p155==1)))) U !(((((p31==1)&&(p28==1))&&(p109==1)) + EG((p38==1)))))) U ((p58==1)&&(p152==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(E(!(EG(!(!(((p154==1)&&(p155==1)))))) U !(((((p31==1)&&(p28==1))&&(p109==1)) + EG((p38=...201
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t6, t54, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/...172
(forward)formula 0,1,0.396913,17876,1,0,256,69955,147,125,2005,60067,342
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 146 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 146 transition count 122
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 146 /149 variables (removed 3) and now considering 122/125 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 146 cols
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Computed 32 place invariants in 15 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 49, 52, 114, 125, 143, 145]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/149 places, 122/125 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 132 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 132 transition count 119
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 132 /135 variables (removed 3) and now considering 119/122 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 132 cols
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 132 cols
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:41:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 173 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 132/149 places, 119/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 132/149 places, 119/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:41:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:41:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4429912095916065287.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4272233205417882066.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4429912095916065287.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4272233205417882066.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19887e+09,0.275265,14100,2,1887,5,34663,6,0,647,52580,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(((p35==1)&&(p110==1)) U EG(((p105!=1)||(((p32==1)&&(p116==1))&&(p0==1))))) + EX((AX((AG(((p92==0)||(p155==0))) * (p27==0))) * (p5==0))...157
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,((p35==1)&&(p110==1))),((p105!=1)||(((p32==1)&&(p116==1))&&(p0==1))))] != FALSE + [((EY(Init) *...239
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 113/5/6
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 113/0/6
(forward)formula 0,1,0.588938,23260,1,0,12,96883,26,4,3132,59449,12
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 125/125 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 140 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 100 transition count 84
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 100 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 80 transition count 70
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 80 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 74 transition count 64
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 72 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 72 transition count 62
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 60 transition count 50
Applied a total of 162 rules in 6 ms. Remains 60 /149 variables (removed 89) and now considering 50/125 (removed 75) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-16 00:41:01] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [31, 39, 46, 57]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/149 places, 50/125 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 52 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 52 transition count 46
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 52 /56 variables (removed 4) and now considering 46/50 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 52 cols
[2022-05-16 00:41:01] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 52 cols
[2022-05-16 00:41:01] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 315 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 374 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 52/149 places, 46/125 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 52/149 places, 46/125 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13421252397837941649.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7523403553850172426.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13421252397837941649.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7523403553850172426.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,110592,0.028493,4668,2,200,5,1504,6,0,257,1680,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((p143==1)&&(p156==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((p143==1)&&(p156==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.143464,8804,1,0,55,22814,20,50,1244,30175,57
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06a-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2022-05-16 00:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-16 00:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Total runtime 247513 ms.

BK_STOP 1652661662398

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-06a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-06a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r006-tajo-165245689300450"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-06a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-06a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;