Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r006-tajo-165245689300434.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-05a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r006-tajo-165245689300434
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 280K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K Apr 30 02:17 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 30 02:17 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K Apr 30 02:16 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K Apr 30 02:16 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 9 07:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 9 07:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 9 07:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 9 07:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 9 07:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 9 07:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 10 09:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652661128169

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-16 00:32:09] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-16 00:32:09] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-16 00:32:09] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 98 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:09] [INFO ] Transformed 132 places.
[2022-05-16 00:32:09] [INFO ] Transformed 130 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:09] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-16 00:32:09] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 132 places and 130 transitions in 213 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 29 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 25 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 25 transitions.
Support contains 82 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 132 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:09] [INFO ] Computed 34 place invariants in 11 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 193 ms returned [14, 41, 44, 99, 105, 129]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 232 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/132 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 125 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 125 transition count 104
Applied a total of 2 rules in 21 ms. Remains 125 /126 variables (removed 1) and now considering 104/105 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 125 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:10] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 125 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:10] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 194 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 125/132 places, 104/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 125/132 places, 104/105 transitions.
Support contains 82 out of 125 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 69 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
Support contains 80 out of 125 places (down from 82) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 309 resets, run finished after 551 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 ) properties (out of 71) seen :60
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 83 ms. (steps per millisecond=120 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 62 ms. (steps per millisecond=161 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 99 ms. (steps per millisecond=101 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 82 ms. (steps per millisecond=121 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 38 ms. (steps per millisecond=263 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 53 ms. (steps per millisecond=188 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 41 ms. (steps per millisecond=243 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 50 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 11) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 43 ms. (steps per millisecond=232 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 49 ms. (steps per millisecond=204 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 35 ms. (steps per millisecond=285 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 10 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 125 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:11] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 28 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] After 74ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :5 sat :1 real:4
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] After 21ms SMT Verify possible using 19 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :5 sat :0 real:5
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] After 342ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :5 sat :0 real:5
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 28 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] After 53ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :5
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] After 26ms SMT Verify possible using 19 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :5
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 70 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] After 134ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :5
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 33 ms.
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] After 295ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :5
Fused 10 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 12 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 125 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 125 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 112 transition count 91
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 112 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 100 transition count 79
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 92 transition count 71
Free-agglomeration rule applied 10 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 92 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 82 transition count 61
Applied a total of 86 rules in 78 ms. Remains 82 /125 variables (removed 43) and now considering 61/104 (removed 43) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 82/125 places, 61/104 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 107 ms. (steps per millisecond=93 ) properties (out of 3) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=833 ) properties (out of 2) seen :1
Finished Best-First random walk after 732 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=366 )
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
Support contains 69 out of 125 places (down from 70) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 8 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 124 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 124 transition count 103
Applied a total of 2 rules in 25 ms. Remains 124 /125 variables (removed 1) and now considering 103/104 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:12] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 317 ms returned [7, 20, 27, 34, 37, 44, 47, 74, 105, 117, 123]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 321 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/125 places, 103/104 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 110 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 110 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 108 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 108 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 107 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 107 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 106 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 106 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 105 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 105 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 104 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 104 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 103 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 103 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 102 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 102 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 101 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 101 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 100 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 100 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 99 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 99 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 98 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 98 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 97 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 97 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 96 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 96 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 95 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 95 transition count 85
Applied a total of 36 rules in 36 ms. Remains 95 /113 variables (removed 18) and now considering 85/103 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 95 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:13] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 174 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 95 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:13] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 232 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 95/125 places, 85/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 95/125 places, 85/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13806389838927666567.gal : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15543743227084972041.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13806389838927666567.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15543743227084972041.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.15221e+07,0.220882,15564,2,1662,5,38745,6,0,467,64884,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EX(((EF((p43==1)) + EG((p19==1))) + ((p117==1)&&(p130==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(EX(((E(TRUE U (p43==1)) + EG((p19==1))) + ((p117==1)&&(p130==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t38, t48, t53, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,11.601,284596,1,0,577,1.44917e+06,203,324,2798,1.99623e+06,564
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 125 /125 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 125 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned [7, 20, 27, 34, 37, 44, 47, 74, 105, 111, 117]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 107 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 110 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 110 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 107 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 105 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 104 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 104 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 103 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 103 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 102 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 102 transition count 92
Applied a total of 24 rules in 24 ms. Remains 102 /114 variables (removed 12) and now considering 92/104 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 102 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 102 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 102/125 places, 92/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 102/125 places, 92/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5656252562109323565.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6107665731369895640.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5656252562109323565.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6107665731369895640.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.17515e+07,0.172698,11224,2,1448,5,24873,6,0,502,39597,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((EX((EX((p13==1)) * ((p25==0)||(p97==0)))) + (p3==1)) + ((p87==1)||(p43==1))) + (EF((((p26==1)&&(p124==1))&&(p131==1))) * AG(EX(((p6...176
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((EX((EX((p13==1)) * ((p25==0)||(p97==0)))) + (p3==1)) + ((p87==1)||(p43==1))) + (E(TRUE U (((p26==1...237
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t58, t72, t79, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,5.24556,137952,1,0,429,613603,216,266,3031,1.02276e+06,382
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 124 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 124 transition count 103
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 124 /125 variables (removed 1) and now considering 103/104 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned [7, 27, 34, 37, 44, 74, 105, 111, 117, 123]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 100 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/125 places, 103/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 110 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 110 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 109 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 109 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 107 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 105 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 104 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 104 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 103 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 103 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 102 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 102 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 101 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 101 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 100 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 100 transition count 89
Applied a total of 28 rules in 27 ms. Remains 100 /114 variables (removed 14) and now considering 89/103 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 100 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 100 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:32:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 100/125 places, 89/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 100/125 places, 89/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6044023688385862508.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1792894089023467894.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6044023688385862508.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1792894089023467894.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.97964e+07,0.251828,13496,2,1290,5,29700,6,0,487,54397,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(A((((p21==1)&&(p69==1))&&(((((p17==1)&&(p113==1))&&((p62==1)||(p10==1)))||((p21==1)&&(p69==1)))||((p34==1)||(((p49==1)&&(p17==1))&&(p...325
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(!(EG(!(((p11==1)&&(p95==1)))))) U (!((!(E(TRUE U !(((p50==1)&&(p128==1))))) * E(!(!(EG(!...1106
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t43, t58, t75, Intersection with reachable a...223
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,21.3808,516216,1,0,1505,3.40146e+06,229,832,3093,2.54233e+06,1781
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 125 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 112 transition count 91
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 112 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 100 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 99 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 99 transition count 78
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 90 transition count 69
Applied a total of 70 rules in 42 ms. Remains 90 /125 variables (removed 35) and now considering 69/104 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 90 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:52] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 534 ms returned [15, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 48, 72, 77, 83, 89]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 537 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/125 places, 69/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 75 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 67 transition count 61
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 67 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 60 transition count 54
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 56 transition count 50
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 56 transition count 50
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 49
Applied a total of 40 rules in 7 ms. Remains 55 /75 variables (removed 20) and now considering 49/69 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 55 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 55 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 17 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 243 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 314 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 55/125 places, 49/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 55/125 places, 49/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 49 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7769915591929266195.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4132827283988277324.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7769915591929266195.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4132827283988277324.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,44545,0.015371,5092,2,528,5,3210,6,0,267,3143,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(!(A(AG((p13==1)) U !(((p28==1)&&(p70==1)))))) * ((p7==0)||(p79==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p7==0)||(p79==0))) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(!((E(!(!(((p28==1)&&(p70==1)))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !((p1...245
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t42, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,0,0.105997,10816,1,0,132,31905,127,72,1639,22469,188
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 124 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 124 transition count 103
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 124 /125 variables (removed 1) and now considering 103/104 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned [20, 27, 34, 37, 44, 47, 74, 105, 111, 117, 123]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 78 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/125 places, 103/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 109 transition count 99
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 109 /113 variables (removed 4) and now considering 99/103 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 109 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 109 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 109/125 places, 99/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 109/125 places, 99/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2050491953100800946.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9978678997123518049.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2050491953100800946.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9978678997123518049.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.0124e+07,0.118019,10812,2,1125,5,22707,6,0,535,37144,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX((p66==0)) * (EX(((p59==0)&&((p7==0)||(p79==0)))) + EG((p23==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !((p66==0)))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG((p23==0)))) * !(EX(((p59==0)&&((p7==0...181
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t48, t63, Intersection with reachable at eac...218
(forward)formula 0,0,3.81819,120568,1,0,676,780507,223,342,3036,692583,753
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 124 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 124 transition count 103
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 124 /125 variables (removed 1) and now considering 103/104 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:57] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned [7, 20, 27, 37, 44, 47, 74, 105, 111, 117]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/125 places, 103/104 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 111 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 111 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 110 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 110 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 109 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 109 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 107 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 96
Applied a total of 14 rules in 6 ms. Remains 107 /114 variables (removed 7) and now considering 96/103 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 107 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:57] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 107 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:57] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:32:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 107/125 places, 96/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 107/125 places, 96/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability478264305196726989.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability564143748185786629.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability478264305196726989.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability564143748185786629.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...272
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.18825e+07,0.207291,14020,2,2046,5,32578,6,0,524,53856,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AF((EG((p65==1)) + A(((p112==1)&&(p131==1)) U ((p35==1)&&(p83==1)))))) + (AG(((p20==0)||(p114==0))) * EF(((p17==1) + AF(E((p13==1) U ...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((EG((p65==1)) + !((E(!(((p35==1)&&(p83==1))) U (!(((p112==1)&&(p131==1))) * !(((...502
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t44, t55, t59, Intersection with reachable a...223
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,29.5028,594408,1,0,1292,4.0254e+06,247,839,3475,2.76121e+06,1559
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 124 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 124 transition count 103
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 124 /125 variables (removed 1) and now considering 103/104 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 00:33:27] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned [27, 34, 37, 44, 47, 74, 105, 111, 117, 123]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 113 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/125 places, 103/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 110 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 110 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 109 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 109 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 97
Applied a total of 12 rules in 6 ms. Remains 108 /114 variables (removed 6) and now considering 97/103 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-16 00:33:27] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-16 00:33:28] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:33:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 108/125 places, 97/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 108/125 places, 97/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:33:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:33:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14702487366770924561.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability185930889933107773.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14702487366770924561.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability185930889933107773.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.00585e+07,0.130835,10400,2,1237,5,21586,6,0,527,33227,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX((A(((p21==1)&&(p54==1)) U (((p23==1)&&(p7==1))&&(p89==1))) * !(E((p60==1) U ((p13==1)&&(p108==1)))))) * ((AG(A((p13==1) U ((p21==1...231
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX((!((E(!((((p23==1)&&(p7==1))&&(p89==1))) U (!(((p21==1)&&(p54==1))) * !((((p23==1)&&(p7==1))&&(...466
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t46, t59, t61, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,12.0947,307716,1,0,2242,1.94161e+06,259,1182,3186,1.85836e+06,2647
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 124 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 124 transition count 103
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 124 /125 variables (removed 1) and now considering 103/104 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned [7, 20, 34, 37, 44, 47, 74, 105, 111, 123]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 108 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/125 places, 103/104 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 111 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 111 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 110 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 110 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 109 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 109 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 107 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 105 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 104 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 104 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 103 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 103 transition count 92
Applied a total of 22 rules in 28 ms. Remains 103 /114 variables (removed 11) and now considering 92/103 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/125 places, 92/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/125 places, 92/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2036910217184863006.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability516375501550229200.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2036910217184863006.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability516375501550229200.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.17515e+07,0.250425,13016,2,1442,5,29414,6,0,504,49973,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((A(EG(((p123==1)&&(p130==1))) U (EX(((p28==1)&&(p70==1))) * AG((p13==1)))) + (p87==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((EX(((p28==1)&&(p70==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((p13==1))))))))) * !(E(!((EX(((p28==1)&&(p...341
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t58, t72, t79, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,1.02341,31084,1,0,260,155926,215,141,3014,101220,357
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 124 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 124 transition count 103
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 124 /125 variables (removed 1) and now considering 103/104 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 00:33:41] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned [20, 27, 34, 37, 44, 47, 74, 105, 111, 117]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 103 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/125 places, 103/104 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 111 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 111 transition count 100
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 111 /114 variables (removed 3) and now considering 100/103 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 111 cols
[2022-05-16 00:33:41] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 111 cols
[2022-05-16 00:33:42] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:33:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 111/125 places, 100/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 111/125 places, 100/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6270388067558955541.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6987889458594418521.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6270388067558955541.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6987889458594418521.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.20136e+07,0.360656,16172,2,1982,5,40695,6,0,544,68495,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((E(AF((p5==1)) U ((AF(EG(((p112==1)&&(p131==1)))) * EG(((p7==1)&&(p52==1)))) * AG(((p29==1)&&(p76==1))))) * EF(AX((p13!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((EY(Init) * E(!(EG(!((p5==1)))) U ((!(EG(!(EG(((p112==1)&&(p131==1)))))) * EG(((p7==1)&&(p52==1)))) * !(E...229
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t48, t63, Intersection with reachable at eac...219
(forward)formula 0,0,7.00868,168924,1,0,668,1.1044e+06,236,337,3276,954865,749
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 124 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 124 transition count 103
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 124 /125 variables (removed 1) and now considering 103/104 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned [7, 27, 34, 37, 44, 47, 74, 105, 111, 117, 123]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 108 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/125 places, 103/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 108 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 108 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 107 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 107 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 106 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 106 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 105 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 105 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 104 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 104 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 103 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 103 transition count 93
Applied a total of 20 rules in 8 ms. Remains 103 /113 variables (removed 10) and now considering 93/103 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/125 places, 93/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/125 places, 93/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15678970099941802479.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:33:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10671158370914906707.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15678970099941802479.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10671158370914906707.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.99274e+07,0.170391,10944,2,1204,5,22512,6,0,505,36805,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((E(EF((p26==1)) U AX((p33==1))) + AF(((p12==1)||((p21==1)&&(p91==1)))))) + EX(AX(EX((p85==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EX(!(EX(!(EX((p85==1)))))))),!((E(E(TRUE U (p26==1)) U !(EX(!((p33==1))))) + !(EG(!(((p12==1)||(...190
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t58, t74, t83, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,14.3173,338988,1,0,1226,2.13704e+06,225,693,3025,2.11081e+06,1252
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 125 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 113 transition count 92
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 113 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 102 transition count 81
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 93 transition count 72
Applied a total of 64 rules in 18 ms. Remains 93 /125 variables (removed 32) and now considering 72/104 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 93 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned [6, 15, 20, 26, 27, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 50, 73, 79, 85]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 130 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/125 places, 72/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 79 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 69 transition count 62
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 69 transition count 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 62 transition count 55
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 58 transition count 51
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 58 transition count 51
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 57 transition count 50
Applied a total of 44 rules in 9 ms. Remains 57 /79 variables (removed 22) and now considering 50/72 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 57 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 57 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 57/125 places, 50/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 57/125 places, 50/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14212032250015452126.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17195088168215739469.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14212032250015452126.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17195088168215739469.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,93185,0.031112,5568,2,585,5,5406,6,0,278,6546,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((p6==1)&&(p102==1)) * ((AF(((p124==1)&&(p131==1))) + AF((((p42==1)&&(p115==1))||(p5==1)))) + ((p35==1)&&(p56==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((p6==1)&&(p102==1)) * ((!(EG(!(((p124==1)&&(p131==1))))) + !(EG(!((((p42==1)&&(p115==1))||(p5==1)...196
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t49, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.630822,30264,1,0,540,156454,133,269,1744,145128,616
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 124 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 124 transition count 103
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 124 /125 variables (removed 1) and now considering 103/104 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned [27, 34, 37, 44, 47, 74, 105, 111, 117, 123]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/125 places, 103/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 110 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 110 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 109 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 109 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 107 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 105 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 104 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 104 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 103 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 103 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 102 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 102 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 101 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 101 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 100 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 100 transition count 89
Applied a total of 28 rules in 11 ms. Remains 100 /114 variables (removed 14) and now considering 89/103 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 100 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 100 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 100/125 places, 89/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 100/125 places, 89/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9852186188783255950.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15428044859675894721.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9852186188783255950.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15428044859675894721.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.97964e+07,0.129809,11012,2,1252,5,22886,6,0,487,36123,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((!(AX((p3==1))) + E(AF(((p7==1)&&(p89==1))) U (((p66==1)||(p65==1))&&((p49==1)||((p11==1)&&(p95==1)))))) U (EF(((p21==1)&&(p91==1)))...188
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY(Init),(!(!(EX(!((p3==1))))) + E(!(EG(!(((p7==1)&&(p89==1))))) U (((p66==1)||(p65==1))&&((p49==1)||((...432
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t43, t58, t75, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,7.46179,207804,1,0,896,1.25119e+06,218,537,2946,1.24299e+06,1114
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 125 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 115 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 114 transition count 93
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 114 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 102 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 101 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 101 transition count 80
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 93 transition count 72
Applied a total of 64 rules in 34 ms. Remains 93 /125 variables (removed 32) and now considering 72/104 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 93 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:12] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned [6, 15, 21, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 35, 52, 75, 80, 86, 92]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 134 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/125 places, 72/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 77 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 56 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 55 transition count 50
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 55 transition count 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 54 transition count 49
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 51 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 51 transition count 46
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 49 transition count 44
Applied a total of 56 rules in 14 ms. Remains 49 /77 variables (removed 28) and now considering 44/72 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 49 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 49 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 49/125 places, 44/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 49/125 places, 44/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11599231435232782512.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10524412755483727542.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11599231435232782512.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10524412755483727542.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,100865,0.018564,5128,2,397,5,2636,6,0,242,2656,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((AG((p3==1)) + EG((p24==1))) + ((p61==1)||(p49==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((!(E(TRUE U !((p3==1)))) + EG((p24==1))) + ((p61==1)||(p49==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t12, t36, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect...173
(forward)formula 0,0,0.174493,11644,1,0,174,40917,120,79,1539,35826,202
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 124 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 124 transition count 103
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 124 /125 variables (removed 1) and now considering 103/104 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned [7, 20, 27, 34, 37, 44, 47, 74, 105, 111, 117, 123]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 133 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/125 places, 103/104 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 108 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 108 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 107 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 107 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 106 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 106 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 105 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 105 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 104 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 104 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 103 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 103 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 102 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 102 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 101 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 101 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 100 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 100 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 99 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 99 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 98 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 98 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 97 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 97 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 96 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 96 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 95 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 95 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 94 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 94 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 93 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 93 transition count 84
Applied a total of 38 rules in 16 ms. Remains 93 /112 variables (removed 19) and now considering 84/103 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 93 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 93 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/125 places, 84/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 93/125 places, 84/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability220457495477492141.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13383951896038411496.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability220457495477492141.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13383951896038411496.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.96325e+07,0.28083,14068,2,1122,5,31746,6,0,458,58770,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((AF((p46==1)) * (p33==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((!(EG(!((p46==1)))) * (p33==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t38, t48, t53, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,2.90254,99948,1,0,655,620380,192,322,2627,567276,715
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 125 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 112 transition count 91
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 112 transition count 78
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 99 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 98 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 98 transition count 77
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 92 transition count 71
Applied a total of 66 rules in 16 ms. Remains 92 /125 variables (removed 33) and now considering 71/104 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 92 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [6, 16, 21, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 51, 74, 79, 85, 91]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/125 places, 71/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 76 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 59 transition count 54
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 59 transition count 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 57 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 53 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 53 transition count 48
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 51 transition count 46
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 50 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 50 transition count 45
Applied a total of 52 rules in 12 ms. Remains 50 /76 variables (removed 26) and now considering 45/71 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 50 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 50 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 50/125 places, 45/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 50/125 places, 45/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10370602422214339950.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2960944075883773794.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10370602422214339950.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2960944075883773794.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,101697,0.026851,5224,2,634,5,2801,6,0,245,3037,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((p35==1)&&(p71==1))) + E(!(A(((!((p5==1)||(p30==1)))&&(p31!=1)) U !(AF((p20==1))))) U (p33==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(!(!((E(!(!(!(EG(!((p20==1)))))) U (!(((!((p5==1)||(p30==1)))&&(p31!=1))) * !(!(!(EG(!((p20==1)...244
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t12, t20, t26, t44, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed...191
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.16219,52936,1,0,738,292934,133,422,1530,350034,728
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 125 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 112 transition count 91
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 112 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 100 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 99 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 99 transition count 78
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 91 transition count 70
Applied a total of 68 rules in 16 ms. Remains 91 /125 variables (removed 34) and now considering 70/104 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 91 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned [5, 26, 27, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 50, 73, 78, 84, 90]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 78 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/125 places, 70/104 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 77 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 69 transition count 62
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 69 transition count 58
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 65 transition count 58
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 61 transition count 54
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 61 transition count 54
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 59 transition count 52
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 58 transition count 51
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 58 transition count 51
Applied a total of 38 rules in 12 ms. Remains 58 /77 variables (removed 19) and now considering 51/70 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 58 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 58 cols
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 58/125 places, 51/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 58/125 places, 51/104 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15541537430212837498.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13149395774261400332.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15541537430212837498.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13149395774261400332.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,123393,0.022496,5284,2,712,5,3379,6,0,281,3871,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((p34==1) U (!(((p21==1)&&(p91==1))) + (EF(((p28==1)&&(p82==1))) * (AF(((p27==1)&&(p120==1))) + (p40==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((p34==1) U (!(((p21==1)&&(p91==1))) + (E(TRUE U ((p28==1)&&(p82==1))) * (!(EG(!(((p27==1...197
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t5, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/...172
(forward)formula 0,0,0.342408,21276,1,0,369,95801,138,183,1725,92622,426
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 00:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Total runtime 129390 ms.

BK_STOP 1652661258923

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-05a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-05a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r006-tajo-165245689300434"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-05a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-05a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;