About the Execution of ITS-Tools for AutoFlight-PT-04a
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 627.703 | 44081.00 | 56010.00 | 38.10 | FFFTFTFTFFFTTTFT | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r006-tajo-165245689300418.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-04a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r006-tajo-165245689300418
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 280K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K Apr 30 02:14 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K Apr 30 02:14 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K Apr 30 02:13 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Apr 30 02:13 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 9 07:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 9 07:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 9 07:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 9 07:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 9 07:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 9 07:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 10 09:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1652660733929
Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-16 00:25:35] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-16 00:25:35] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-16 00:25:35] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 59 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:35] [INFO ] Transformed 107 places.
[2022-05-16 00:25:35] [INFO ] Transformed 105 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:35] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-16 00:25:35] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 107 places and 105 transitions in 150 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 20 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 20 transitions.
Support contains 77 out of 107 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 107 /107 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 107 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:35] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 10 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 172 ms returned [40, 80]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 197 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/107 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 105/107 places, 85/85 transitions.
Support contains 77 out of 105 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 344 resets, run finished after 605 ms. (steps per millisecond=16 ) properties (out of 77) seen :62
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :3
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 12 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 26 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] After 182ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :4 sat :0 real:8
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 26 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] After 61ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :8
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] After 38ms SMT Verify possible using 19 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :8
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 80 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 00:25:36] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 66 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] After 242ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :8
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 32 ms.
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] After 408ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :8
Fused 12 Parikh solutions to 8 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 12 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 105 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 75
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 88 transition count 68
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 83 transition count 63
Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 83 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 75 transition count 55
Applied a total of 60 rules in 19 ms. Remains 75 /105 variables (removed 30) and now considering 55/85 (removed 30) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 75/105 places, 55/85 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 37 ms. (steps per millisecond=270 ) properties (out of 3) seen :2
Finished Best-First random walk after 144 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=144 )
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
Computed a total of 8 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [21, 28, 31, 37, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 92 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 92 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 91 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 91 transition count 80
Applied a total of 10 rules in 8 ms. Remains 91 /96 variables (removed 5) and now considering 80/85 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 91 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 91 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 91/105 places, 80/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 91/105 places, 80/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7567241159484954694.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7886161304345914304.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7567241159484954694.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7886161304345914304.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0765e+06,0.077066,8636,2,980,5,15116,6,0,440,21848,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EX(((p9==1)||((p3==0)&&((p53==1)||((p99==1)&&(p106==1))))))) * AF((!(E((((p10==1)&&(p88==1))||(p23==1)) U (((p9==1)&&(p34==1))&&(p91=...285
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(EX(((p9==1)||((p3==0)&&((p53==1)||((p99==1)&&(p106==1))))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!((!(E((((p10=...445
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t30, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,5.0241,157204,1,0,1072,1.00413e+06,208,561,2593,931673,1142
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned [7, 31, 34, 37, 84, 90, 96, 104]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 94 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 94 transition count 82
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 94 /97 variables (removed 3) and now considering 82/85 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 94 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 94 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 94/105 places, 82/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 94/105 places, 82/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5771125672880614671.gal : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16146653833297694160.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5771125672880614671.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16146653833297694160.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.10133e+06,0.086995,7936,2,1201,5,12852,6,0,454,15976,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(((!((E(((p8==1)&&(p59==1)) U ((p14==1)&&(p73==1))) + ((p13==1)&&(p16==1)))) + (p33!=1)) + !(A((((p104==1)&&(p105==1))||(p46==1)) U (...359
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!((E(!(!(EX((p20==1)))) U (!(((p14==1)&&(p73==1))) * !(!(EX((p20==1)))))) + EG(!(!(EX((p20==1...1249
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t41, t75, Intersection with reachable at each step enab...207
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,13.6378,438588,1,0,1319,3.15079e+06,231,753,2925,1.90597e+06,1503
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned [14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 61, 84, 90, 96, 104]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 97 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 91 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 91 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 90 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 90 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 89 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 89 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 88 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 88 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 87 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 87 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 86 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 86 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 85 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 85 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 84 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 84 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 83 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 83 transition count 73
Applied a total of 24 rules in 11 ms. Remains 83 /95 variables (removed 12) and now considering 73/85 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 83 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 83 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 83/105 places, 73/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 83/105 places, 73/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14275690789914620909.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12314966004885853927.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14275690789914620909.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12314966004885853927.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.04782e+06,0.054872,7680,2,981,5,12503,6,0,403,17698,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((AG(((p10==1)&&(p88==1))) * (p30==1)) * AF((p10==1)))) + E(((p37==1)&&(p97==1)) U AG((AX(((p104==1)&&(p105==1))) * ((p17==1)||((p7==...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(((p37==1)&&(p97==1)) U !(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!(((p104==1)&&(p105==1))))) * ((p17==1)||((p7==1)&&(...257
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, t61, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,2.22443,80048,1,0,523,493958,186,259,2551,455598,588
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:58] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [7, 21, 28, 37, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 90 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 90 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 89 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 89 transition count 79
Applied a total of 12 rules in 6 ms. Remains 89 /95 variables (removed 6) and now considering 79/85 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 89 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 89 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 13 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/105 places, 79/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 89/105 places, 79/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15906085739731004305.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17931614749534314580.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15906085739731004305.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17931614749534314580.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.97152e+06,0.062797,6752,2,793,5,8955,6,0,431,12124,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((EG(((p31==0)||(p85==0))) + AF(((p4==1)&&(p76==1)))) + (((p38==1)&&(p102==1)) + (AX(EF(((p34==1)&&(p91==1)))) * ((AX((p48==1)) + (p1...230
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EG(((p24==0)||(p100==0))) * ((p8==0)||(p59==0))))) * !((EG(((p31==0)||(p85==0))) +...496
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t30, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,1,2.36353,99212,1,0,1339,622327,206,685,2613,579097,1559
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 37, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 87 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 86 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 84 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 83 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 83 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 82 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 82 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 81 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 81 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 80 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 80 transition count 73
Applied a total of 24 rules in 9 ms. Remains 80 /92 variables (removed 12) and now considering 73/85 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 80 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 80 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 9 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 80/105 places, 73/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 80/105 places, 73/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18196885554514959871.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14051217572430666746.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18196885554514959871.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14051217572430666746.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.94694e+06,0.057682,8048,2,803,5,12846,6,0,395,19099,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(E(AX((p49==1)) U !(E((p10==1) U (p71==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(!(EX(!((p49==1)))) U !(E((p10==1) U (p71==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t60, t65, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,0.630194,37228,1,0,376,207315,171,193,2239,208229,391
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 92 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 88 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 88 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 87 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 87 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 86 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 86 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 85 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 85 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 84 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 84 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 83 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 83 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 82 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 82 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 81 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 81 transition count 73
Applied a total of 24 rules in 5 ms. Remains 81 /93 variables (removed 12) and now considering 73/85 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 81 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 81 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 81/105 places, 73/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 81/105 places, 73/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17712942224436675261.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10107303397539885496.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17712942224436675261.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10107303397539885496.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.94694e+06,0.053051,7532,2,780,5,11777,6,0,397,18227,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(A(((p49==1) + AF(EG(((p17==1)&&(p94==1))))) U EX((AG(((p37==1)&&(p97==1))) + (((p10==1)&&(p88==1))&&(p20==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EX((!(E(TRUE U !(((p37==1)&&(p97==1))))) + (((p10==1)&&(p88==1))&&(p20==1)))))))) * !(E(!(E...382
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t60, t65, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,5.74078,210640,1,0,756,1.3919e+06,184,460,2481,1.04405e+06,815
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 105 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 99 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 98 transition count 78
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 98 transition count 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 93 transition count 73
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 88 transition count 68
Applied a total of 34 rules in 14 ms. Remains 88 /105 variables (removed 17) and now considering 68/85 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 88 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned [5, 12, 17, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 49, 68, 80, 85]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 85 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 74 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 60 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 59 transition count 53
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 59 transition count 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 54 transition count 48
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 51 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 51 transition count 45
Applied a total of 46 rules in 17 ms. Remains 51 /74 variables (removed 23) and now considering 45/68 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 51 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 51 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 51/105 places, 45/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 51/105 places, 45/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4833245337655364999.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5642994171404749889.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4833245337655364999.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5642994171404749889.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,39169,0.030102,5388,2,534,5,4632,6,0,251,5241,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(!(((!(((((p9==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p96==1)) + E((p53==1) U (p9==1)))) * (p92==1)) * (p105==1)))) U EF((AG((p50==1)) * !((!((((p23==1)&&(p...205
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(((!(((((p9==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p96==1)) + E((p53==1) U (p9==1)))) * (p92==1)) * (...452
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t9, t19, t40, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/i...181
(forward)formula 0,0,0.117613,9116,1,0,102,22792,118,48,1538,17411,113
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 105 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 96 transition count 76
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 96 transition count 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 89 transition count 69
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 84 transition count 64
Applied a total of 42 rules in 17 ms. Remains 84 /105 variables (removed 21) and now considering 64/85 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 84 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned [7, 18, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 44, 70, 76, 81, 83]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 94 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/105 places, 64/85 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 70 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 67 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 63 transition count 57
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 63 transition count 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 56 transition count 50
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 52 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 52 transition count 46
Applied a total of 36 rules in 8 ms. Remains 52 /70 variables (removed 18) and now considering 46/64 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 52 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:08] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 52 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 99 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 52/105 places, 46/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 52/105 places, 46/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3452868341794713797.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12970523787386521464.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3452868341794713797.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12970523787386521464.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20737,0.027497,5092,2,442,5,2894,6,0,252,2764,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((EF((p2==1)) + EG((p2==0)))) * (EF(((!(A(((p86==1)&&(p105==1)) U (p12==1))) * ((p28==0)||(p67==0))) * (p5==0))) + AF(((p14==1)&&(p65=...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG((p2==0)))) * !(E(TRUE U (p2==1))))] = FALSE * [FwdG((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((!(!((E(!((p1...299
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t8, t10, t19, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
(forward)formula 0,1,0.716823,30752,1,0,489,157186,140,268,1582,169599,615
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 34, 37, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 109 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 89 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 89 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 88 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 88 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 87 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 87 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 86 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 86 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 85 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 85 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 84 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 84 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 83 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 83 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 82 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 82 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 81 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 81 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 80 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 80 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 79 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 79 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 78 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 78 transition count 69
Applied a total of 32 rules in 13 ms. Remains 78 /94 variables (removed 16) and now considering 69/85 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 78 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 78 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:09] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 78/105 places, 69/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 78/105 places, 69/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16987161680431064416.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10653524045007184677.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16987161680431064416.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10653524045007184677.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.93056e+06,0.080587,8032,2,904,5,12456,6,0,379,17767,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(E(!(((AX(((p28==1)&&(p75==1))) * (p23==1)) * (((p31==1)&&(p85==1))||(p27==1)))) U AX((p17==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(((!(EX(!(((p28==1)&&(p75==1))))) * (p23==1)) * (((p31==1)&&(p85==1))||(p27==1)))) U !(...184
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, t61, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,0.68347,28220,1,0,182,141318,164,91,2242,112872,202
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 37, 61, 84, 90, 96, 104]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 111 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 89 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 89 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 88 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 88 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 87 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 87 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 86 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 86 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 85 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 85 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 84 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 84 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 83 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 83 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 82 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 82 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 81 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 81 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 80 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 80 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 79 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 79 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 78 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 78 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 77 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 77 transition count 69
Applied a total of 32 rules in 11 ms. Remains 77 /93 variables (removed 16) and now considering 69/85 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 77 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 77 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 77/105 places, 69/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 77/105 places, 69/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5292941970475511678.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7061882641870669365.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5292941970475511678.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7061882641870669365.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.03144e+06,0.13413,9792,2,903,5,19057,6,0,379,31538,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG((p30==1))) + AG(AX((AG(((p104==1)&&(p105==1))) + ((p6==1)&&(p17==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((EY(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p30==1))))))),TRUE)) * !(((p6==1)&&(p17==1)))),TRUE) * !(((p104...182
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t33, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,0.454812,18888,1,0,143,67648,165,72,2342,68621,155
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned [14, 21, 28, 34, 37, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 87 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 91 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 91 transition count 81
Applied a total of 8 rules in 1 ms. Remains 91 /95 variables (removed 4) and now considering 81/85 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 91 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 91 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 91/105 places, 81/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 91/105 places, 81/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3517202063720783260.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16608338343756550464.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3517202063720783260.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16608338343756550464.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.08059e+06,0.109001,7564,2,1159,5,12380,6,0,443,16495,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((EF((p5==0)) + AF((p71==0))) * AF(((!(A(((p31==1)&&(p85==1)) U ((p17==1)&&(p94==1)))) + (p7==0)) + (p42==0))))) * A((AX(!(EG((p19==1...196
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (p5==0)))),!((p71==0)))] = FALSE * [FwdG(EY(Init),!(((!(!((E(!(((p17==1)&&(p94==1...415
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 79/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.27797,13020,1,0,11,42948,20,4,2163,28830,9
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 105 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 75
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 88 transition count 68
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 62
Applied a total of 46 rules in 14 ms. Remains 82 /105 variables (removed 23) and now considering 62/85 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 82 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [6, 12, 17, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 43, 62, 68, 74, 79, 81]
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 112 ms to find 17 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/105 places, 62/85 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 23 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 23 transitions
Performed 23 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 23
Iterating post reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 65 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 42 transition count 39
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 37 transition count 34
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 37 transition count 34
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 36 transition count 33
Applied a total of 58 rules in 6 ms. Remains 36 /65 variables (removed 29) and now considering 33/62 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 36 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 36 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 36/105 places, 33/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 36/105 places, 33/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6431427769954217042.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3196162525618575892.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6431427769954217042.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3196162525618575892.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9601,0.022303,4516,2,204,5,1304,6,0,179,1284,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((p5==1)||(p10==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((p5==1)||(p10==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t27, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,0.125408,8352,1,0,130,18591,93,76,1079,21829,126
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 105 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 75
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 88 transition count 68
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 81 transition count 61
Applied a total of 48 rules in 14 ms. Remains 81 /105 variables (removed 24) and now considering 61/85 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 81 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned [6, 11, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 42, 61, 67, 73, 78, 80]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 112 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/105 places, 61/85 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 65 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 50 transition count 46
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 50 transition count 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 47 transition count 43
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 42 transition count 38
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 42 transition count 38
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 41 transition count 37
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 41 transition count 37
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 40 transition count 36
Applied a total of 50 rules in 7 ms. Remains 40 /65 variables (removed 25) and now considering 36/61 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 36 rows 40 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 36 rows 40 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 40/105 places, 36/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 40/105 places, 36/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 36 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4068899304640796172.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8954770963698916118.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4068899304640796172.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8954770963698916118.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7937,0.020608,4664,2,192,5,1308,6,0,196,1242,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((AF((p6==0)) + EG(((p21==0)||(p56==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((!(EG(!((p6==0)))) + EG(((p21==0)||(p56==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t30, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.287118,14608,1,0,468,62172,110,254,1199,63317,566
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 26 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 26 transitions
Performed 26 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 97 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 71 transition count 58
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 71 transition count 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 60 transition count 50
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 60 transition count 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 57 transition count 47
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 49 transition count 39
Applied a total of 100 rules in 17 ms. Remains 49 /105 variables (removed 56) and now considering 39/85 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 49 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [23, 32, 36, 40, 46, 48]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/105 places, 39/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 38 transition count 34
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 38 transition count 34
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 37 transition count 33
Applied a total of 12 rules in 6 ms. Remains 37 /43 variables (removed 6) and now considering 33/39 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 37 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:12] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 37 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 37/105 places, 33/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 37/105 places, 33/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13577883742461851341.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3772237728737650524.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13577883742461851341.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3772237728737650524.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9728,0.00851,4692,2,104,5,696,6,0,184,633,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p38==1)&&(p102==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p38==1)&&(p102==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.017887,5072,1,0,9,2926,14,3,817,1430,5
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned [7, 14, 28, 31, 34, 37, 61, 84, 96, 102]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 91 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 91 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 90 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 90 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 89 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 89 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 88 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 88 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 87 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 87 transition count 77
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 87 /95 variables (removed 8) and now considering 77/85 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 87 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 87 cols
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 87/105 places, 77/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 87/105 places, 77/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability291735071105013320.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9017333667566658686.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability291735071105013320.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9017333667566658686.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.06421e+06,0.100764,8388,2,1433,5,14548,6,0,425,19401,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF(((p6==1)&&(p83==1))) U ((E(((p87==1)&&(p106==1)) U EF(((p21==1)&&(p74==1)))) + (!(((EF(((p32==1)&&(p90==1))) * EF(((p92==1)&&(p105==...239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((E(((p87==1)&&(p106==1)) U E(TRUE U ((p21==1)&&(p74==1)))) + (!(((E(TRUE U ((p32==1)&&(p90==1)...760
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t57, t65, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,4.50199,153400,1,0,813,967077,198,486,2711,861772,981
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2022-05-16 00:26:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 00:26:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Total runtime 42866 ms.
BK_STOP 1652660778010
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-04a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-04a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r006-tajo-165245689300418"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-04a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-04a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;