Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r006-tajo-165245689300417.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-04a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r006-tajo-165245689300417
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 280K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K Apr 30 02:14 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K Apr 30 02:14 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K Apr 30 02:13 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Apr 30 02:13 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 9 07:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 9 07:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 9 07:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 9 07:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 9 07:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 9 07:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 10 09:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652660708468

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-16 00:25:09] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-16 00:25:09] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-16 00:25:09] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 64 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:09] [INFO ] Transformed 107 places.
[2022-05-16 00:25:09] [INFO ] Transformed 105 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:09] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-16 00:25:09] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 107 places and 105 transitions in 157 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 20 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 20 transitions.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 91 out of 107 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 107 /107 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 107 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:09] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 10 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 167 ms returned [7, 14]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 204 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/107 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 105/107 places, 85/85 transitions.
Support contains 91 out of 105 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 105 places (down from 91) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 324 resets, run finished after 670 ms. (steps per millisecond=14 ) properties (out of 93) seen :55
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 38) seen :1
Running SMT prover for 37 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 25 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 25 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] After 48ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :31 sat :2 real:4
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] After 10ms SMT Verify possible using 12 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :31 sat :0 real:6
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] After 168ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :31 sat :0 real:6
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 25 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 25 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] After 43ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :31 sat :6
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] After 36ms SMT Verify possible using 12 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :31 sat :6
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] After 79ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :31 sat :6
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 31 ms.
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] After 211ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :31 sat :6
Fused 37 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 21 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 6 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=21 )
Parikh walk visited 6 properties in 2 ms.
Successfully simplified 31 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 105 places (down from 66) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 98 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 73 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 72 transition count 58
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 72 transition count 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 59 transition count 49
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 59 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 55 transition count 45
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 48 transition count 38
Applied a total of 102 rules in 16 ms. Remains 48 /105 variables (removed 57) and now considering 38/85 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 48 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [22, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 47]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 41 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/105 places, 38/85 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 41 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 37
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 36 transition count 33
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 36 transition count 33
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 35 transition count 32
Applied a total of 12 rules in 7 ms. Remains 35 /41 variables (removed 6) and now considering 32/38 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 35 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 35 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/105 places, 32/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 35/105 places, 32/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13713767278943467900.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8943109867776253513.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13713767278943467900.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8943109867776253513.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6528,0.012201,4428,2,149,5,902,6,0,175,903,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((p23!=1) * EG(EF((p75==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((p23!=1) * EG(E(TRUE U (p75==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t27, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.038046,6316,1,0,79,9108,98,38,1070,6920,89
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [19, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 60, 78, 84, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 79 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 89 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 89 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 88 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 88 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 87 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 87 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 86 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 86 transition count 78
Applied a total of 14 rules in 13 ms. Remains 86 /93 variables (removed 7) and now considering 78/85 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 86 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 86 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 86/105 places, 78/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 86/105 places, 78/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6024135721465042426.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3981998268726579518.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6024135721465042426.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3981998268726579518.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0683e+06,0.097239,8848,2,1498,5,15848,6,0,424,21867,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AG(EF(EX(((p92==0)||(p78==1)))))) U ((!((AG((p53==1)) * EX((p76!=1)))) * (p67==1)) * EF(((p52==0)||(p74==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U EX(((p92==0)||(p78==1))))))))) * (!((!(E(TRUE U !((p53==1)))) * EX((p7...216
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t32, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,1,1.06333,50228,1,0,212,268570,183,109,2589,205896,252
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned [19, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 60, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 100 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 87 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 86 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 84 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 83 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 83 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 82 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 82 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 81 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 81 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 80 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 80 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 79 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 79 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 78 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 78 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 77 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 77 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 76 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 76 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 75 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 75 transition count 68
Applied a total of 34 rules in 24 ms. Remains 75 /92 variables (removed 17) and now considering 68/85 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 75 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 75 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 75/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 75/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15360376543440208458.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3137891453837586504.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15360376543440208458.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3137891453837586504.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92646e+06,0.058572,7824,2,769,5,12902,6,0,370,18996,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(TRUE) + EG(AX(AG((p29==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * TRUE)] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p29==1))))))))] != FALSE)
(forward)formula 0,1,0.059571,7824,1,0,6,12902,7,1,476,18996,1
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [19, 26, 29, 35, 38, 60, 78, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 90 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 90 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 89 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 89 transition count 80
Applied a total of 10 rules in 3 ms. Remains 89 /94 variables (removed 5) and now considering 80/85 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 89 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 89 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/105 places, 80/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 89/105 places, 80/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4311222720410952134.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16250435272107237623.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4311222720410952134.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16250435272107237623.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0765e+06,0.039296,6832,2,901,5,8430,6,0,436,10316,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF((((p19==0)||(p17==1))&&((p52==0)||(p86==1)))) + (!(E((p16==1) U (p102==1))) * ((AX(FALSE) + (p65==0)) + ((p34==0)&&(p95==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EG(!((((p19==0)||(p17==1))&&((p52==0)||(p86==1)))))))),(p16==1)) * (p102==1))] = ...312
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t30, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 78/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.836692,44764,1,0,341,251686,195,158,2636,242026,407
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:14] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned [19, 26, 29, 32, 35, 60, 78, 90, 96, 104]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 102 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 92 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 92 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 91 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 91 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 90 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 90 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 89 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 89 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 88 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 88 transition count 78
Applied a total of 14 rules in 13 ms. Remains 88 /95 variables (removed 7) and now considering 78/85 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 88 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:14] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 88 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:14] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:25:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/105 places, 78/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 88/105 places, 78/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1142878185757022760.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1250212445248422301.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1142878185757022760.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1250212445248422301.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.16918e+06,0.07008,8320,2,1138,5,14948,6,0,430,20007,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(AX(!(EG(((p40==0)||(p50==1))))) U ((p89==1) * (!(AG(((p99==0)||(p104==1)))) + !(((((p102==0)||(p68==1))&&((p40==0)||(p58==1)))||(!((...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!(EX(!(!(EG(((p40==0)||(p50==1))))))) U ((p89==1) * (!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p99==0)||(p104==1)))))) + !...243
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t57, t65, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,1,1.81318,79960,1,0,288,508075,192,151,2603,315655,373
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:16] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [19, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 60, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 87 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 86 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 84 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 83 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 83 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 82 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 82 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 81 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 81 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 80 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 80 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 79 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 79 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 78 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 78 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 77 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 77 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 76 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 76 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 75 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 75 transition count 68
Applied a total of 34 rules in 11 ms. Remains 75 /92 variables (removed 17) and now considering 68/85 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 75 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:16] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 75 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 75/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 75/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8953194585043562689.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15793106606673201204.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8953194585043562689.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15793106606673201204.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92646e+06,0.0576,7944,2,769,5,12902,6,0,370,18996,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((AG((p6==0)) * EX(TRUE)) * ((p91==0)||((p35==0)&&(p32==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((!(E(TRUE U !((p6==0)))) * EX(TRUE)) * ((p91==0)||((p35==0)&&(p32==1)))))))] = F...159
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t33, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,0.758824,38504,1,0,210,214822,159,107,2162,154383,239
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [19, 26, 32, 35, 38, 60, 78, 84, 90, 102]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 91 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 91 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 90 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 90 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 89 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 89 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 88 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 88 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 87 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 87 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 86 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 86 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 85 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 85 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 84 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 84 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 83 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 83 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 82 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 82 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 81 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 81 transition count 71
Applied a total of 28 rules in 9 ms. Remains 81 /95 variables (removed 14) and now considering 71/85 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 81 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 81 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 81/105 places, 71/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 81/105 places, 71/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7162303391357012379.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12618734111225849241.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7162303391357012379.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12618734111225849241.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.03963e+06,0.070651,8448,2,1194,5,15627,6,0,395,20721,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(((!(A((p106==1) U (p31==1))) * AG((p74==0))) * (((p12==0)||(p98==0))||((p6==0)&&(p79==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * (((p12==0)||(p98==0))||((p6==0)&&(p79==1)))) * !(!((E(!((p31==1)) U (!((p106==1)) * !(...226
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, t61, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,0.624554,34544,1,0,173,190982,177,92,2417,121838,214
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [19, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 60, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 110 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 87 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 86 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 84 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 83 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 83 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 82 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 82 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 81 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 81 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 80 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 80 transition count 73
Applied a total of 24 rules in 3 ms. Remains 80 /92 variables (removed 12) and now considering 73/85 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 80 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 80 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 80/105 places, 73/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 80/105 places, 73/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6745355946351326747.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4984440397579322494.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6745355946351326747.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4984440397579322494.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.94694e+06,0.056457,7872,2,803,5,12846,6,0,395,19099,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AX((p57==1))) * AF(((AF(EG((p49!=1))) + AF(AG(((p74==0)||(p38==1))))) + EX((p84==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((p57==1))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EG(!(EG((p49!=1))))) + !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p74=...204
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t60, t65, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,7.43929,260224,1,0,962,1.66794e+06,194,555,2453,1.27596e+06,1055
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned [19, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 60, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 112 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 87 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 86 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 84 transition count 77
Applied a total of 16 rules in 9 ms. Remains 84 /92 variables (removed 8) and now considering 77/85 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 84 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 84 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 84/105 places, 77/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 84/105 places, 77/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2676624127058336021.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1133900342237067652.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2676624127058336021.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1133900342237067652.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.96333e+06,0.088093,8132,2,839,5,13375,6,0,415,19638,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(AF((((p53==0)&&(p27==1))&&(((p67==0)&&(p47==1))||((p45==0)&&(p83==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),!((((p53==0)&&(p27==1))&&(((p67==0)&&(p47==1))||((p45==0)&&(p83==1))))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 62/0/15
(forward)formula 0,0,0.246799,12736,1,0,11,39714,21,4,2094,29423,12
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [19, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 60, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 87 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 88 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 88 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 87 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 86 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 78
Applied a total of 14 rules in 3 ms. Remains 85 /92 variables (removed 7) and now considering 78/85 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 85 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:26] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 85 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 85/105 places, 78/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 85/105 places, 78/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3429091395339920658.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4463035858866249394.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3429091395339920658.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4463035858866249394.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0683e+06,0.07715,8712,2,1128,5,15141,6,0,420,21429,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AX((EF(((p100==0)||(p49==1))) * EX(((p4==0)||(p6==1))))) + EG((((p87==0)&&(p45==1))||((p48==0)&&(p20==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!((E(TRUE U ((p100==0)||(p49==1))) * EX(((p4==0)||(p6==1))))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(EY(Init),(...210
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t32, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 67/0/11
(forward)formula 0,1,0.40553,24264,1,0,165,111850,188,88,2631,94220,186
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned [19, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 60, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 83 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 87 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 86 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 84 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 83 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 83 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 82 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 82 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 81 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 81 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 80 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 80 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 79 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 79 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 78 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 78 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 77 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 77 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 76 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 76 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 75 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 75 transition count 68
Applied a total of 34 rules in 9 ms. Remains 75 /92 variables (removed 17) and now considering 68/85 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 75 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 75 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 75/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 75/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8400579550648334520.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13872155802230468734.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8400579550648334520.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13872155802230468734.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92646e+06,0.06548,7924,2,769,5,12902,6,0,370,18996,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(Init)) * TRUE)] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.066803,7924,1,0,7,12902,7,1,507,18996,2
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 105 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 89 transition count 69
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 89 transition count 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 62
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 77 transition count 57
Applied a total of 56 rules in 17 ms. Remains 77 /105 variables (removed 28) and now considering 57/85 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 77 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned [14, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 40, 50, 56, 62, 74, 76]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/105 places, 57/85 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 62 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 52 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 50 transition count 45
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 50 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 49 transition count 44
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 46 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 46 transition count 41
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 45 transition count 40
Applied a total of 34 rules in 8 ms. Remains 45 /62 variables (removed 17) and now considering 40/57 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 45 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:27] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/105 places, 40/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 45/105 places, 40/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16307955499312194079.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18029776258459631480.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16307955499312194079.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18029776258459631480.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32257,0.015286,5176,2,365,5,2223,6,0,222,2570,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((!(A((p30==1) U ((p23==0)||(p10==1)))) + E((((p44==0)||(p95==1))&&(p98==1)) U (p26!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (!(!((E(!(((p23==0)||(p10==1))) U (!((p30==1)) * !(((p23==0)||(p10==1))))) + EG(!...243
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t4, t9, t33, t36, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/i...181
(forward)formula 0,1,0.110681,10252,1,0,161,29293,117,74,1369,29442,191
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [19, 26, 32, 35, 38, 60, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 89 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 89 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 88 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 88 transition count 80
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 88 /93 variables (removed 5) and now considering 80/85 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 88 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 88 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/105 places, 80/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 88/105 places, 80/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16247904002685924184.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16728095069187199388.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16247904002685924184.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16728095069187199388.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0765e+06,0.070081,8316,2,1349,5,14779,6,0,432,20145,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EG(((p97==0)||(p43==1))) * ((EX(((((p29==0)||(p29==1))&&(!((p70==0)||(p9==1))))||(!(((p9==0)||(p24==1))&&((p94==0)||(p70==1)))))) + !(...323
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(FwdU(Init,(EG(((p97==0)||(p43==1))) * ((EX(((((p29==0)||(p29==1))&&(!((p70==0)||(p9==1))))||(!(((p9==0...830
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t30, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 76/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,2.99124,119244,1,0,908,710209,215,476,2619,714997,1047
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 60, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 88 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 88 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 87 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 87 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 86 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 86 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 85 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 85 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 84 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 84 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 83 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 83 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 82 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 82 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 81 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 81 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 80 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 80 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 79 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 79 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 78 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 78 transition count 70
Applied a total of 30 rules in 4 ms. Remains 78 /93 variables (removed 15) and now considering 70/85 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 78 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 78 cols
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 78/105 places, 70/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 78/105 places, 70/85 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 70 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4442012327297566464.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6541869125550741318.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4442012327297566464.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6541869125550741318.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.93466e+06,0.060906,7796,2,900,5,12777,6,0,382,18896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((EX(TRUE) * AX(((p9==1)&&((p0==0)||(p0==1)))))) + (EF((p21!=1)) * !(E(((p54==0)||(p4==1)) U (p20==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(E(TRUE U (EX(TRUE) * !(EX(!(((p9==1)&&((p0==0)||(p0==1)))))))))) * !(E(TRUE U (p21!=1))))] = FALSE ...281
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, t61, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 66/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.259697,16944,1,0,147,59791,168,74,2273,63486,155
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:25:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 22201 ms.

BK_STOP 1652660731975

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-04a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-04a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r006-tajo-165245689300417"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-04a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-04a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;