fond
Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
ITS-Tools compared to other tools («Known» models, LTLFireability)
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

Introduction

This page presents how ITS-Tools do cope efficiently with the LTLFireability examination face to the other participating tools. In this page, we consider «Known» models.

The next sections will show chart comparing performances in terms of both memory and execution time.The x-axis corresponds to the challenging tool where the y-axes represents ITS-Tools' performances. Thus, points below the diagonal of a chart denote comparisons favorables to the tool while others corresponds to situations where the challenging tool performs better.

You might also find plots out of the range that denote the case were at least one tool could not answer appropriately (error, time-out, could not compute or did not competed).

ITS-Tools versus GreatSPN

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 2822 runs (1411 for ITS-Tools and 1411 for GreatSPN, so there are 1411 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing ITS-Tools to GreatSPN are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  ITS-Tools GreatSPN Both tools   ITS-Tools GreatSPN
All computed OK 730 0 355   Smallest Memory Footprint
ITS-Tools = GreatSPN 4 Times tool wins 1123 280
ITS-Tools > GreatSPN 309   Shortest Execution Time
ITS-Tools < GreatSPN 5 Times tool wins 1075 328
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 2 97 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 0 635 6


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where ITS-Tools computed more values than GreatSPN, denote cases where ITS-Tools computed less values than GreatSPN, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

ITS-Tools wins when points are below the diagonal, GreatSPN wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

ITS-Tools versus Tapaal

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 2822 runs (1411 for ITS-Tools and 1411 for Tapaal, so there are 1411 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing ITS-Tools to Tapaal are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  ITS-Tools Tapaal Both tools   ITS-Tools Tapaal
All computed OK 10 5 741   Smallest Memory Footprint
ITS-Tools = Tapaal 136 Times tool wins 498 910
ITS-Tools > Tapaal 355   Shortest Execution Time
ITS-Tools < Tapaal 161 Times tool wins 496 912
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 2 0 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 3 10 3


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where ITS-Tools computed more values than Tapaal, denote cases where ITS-Tools computed less values than Tapaal, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

ITS-Tools wins when points are below the diagonal, Tapaal wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

ITS-Tools versus enPAC

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 2822 runs (1411 for ITS-Tools and 1411 for enPAC, so there are 1411 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing ITS-Tools to enPAC are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  ITS-Tools enPAC Both tools   ITS-Tools enPAC
All computed OK 33 6 420   Smallest Memory Footprint
ITS-Tools = enPAC 86 Times tool wins 928 481
ITS-Tools > enPAC 776   Shortest Execution Time
ITS-Tools < enPAC 88 Times tool wins 661 748
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 2 10 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 5 24 1


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where ITS-Tools computed more values than enPAC, denote cases where ITS-Tools computed less values than enPAC, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

ITS-Tools wins when points are below the diagonal, enPAC wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

ITS-Tools versus 2021-gold

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 2822 runs (1411 for ITS-Tools and 1411 for 2021-gold, so there are 1411 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing ITS-Tools to 2021-gold are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  ITS-Tools 2021-gold Both tools   ITS-Tools 2021-gold
All computed OK 159 2 615   Smallest Memory Footprint
ITS-Tools = 2021-gold 99 Times tool wins 655 750
ITS-Tools > 2021-gold 419   Shortest Execution Time
ITS-Tools < 2021-gold 111 Times tool wins 605 800
Do not compete 0 116 0
Error detected 2 1 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 1 43 5


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where ITS-Tools computed more values than 2021-gold, denote cases where ITS-Tools computed less values than 2021-gold, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

ITS-Tools wins when points are below the diagonal, 2021-gold wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart