fond
Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
ITS-Tools compared to other tools («All» models, StateSpace)
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

Introduction

This page presents how ITS-Tools do cope efficiently with the StateSpace examination face to the other participating tools. In this page, we consider «All» models.

The next sections will show chart comparing performances in terms of both memory and execution time.The x-axis corresponds to the challenging tool where the y-axes represents ITS-Tools' performances. Thus, points below the diagonal of a chart denote comparisons favorables to the tool while others corresponds to situations where the challenging tool performs better.

You might also find plots out of the range that denote the case were at least one tool could not answer appropriately (error, time-out, could not compute or did not competed).

ITS-Tools versus GreatSPN

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 3234 runs (1617 for ITS-Tools and 1617 for GreatSPN, so there are 1617 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing ITS-Tools to GreatSPN are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  ITS-Tools GreatSPN Both tools   ITS-Tools GreatSPN
All computed OK 75 92 0   Smallest Memory Footprint
ITS-Tools = GreatSPN 8 Times tool wins 257 779
ITS-Tools > GreatSPN 0   Shortest Execution Time
ITS-Tools < GreatSPN 861 Times tool wins 254 782
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 9 3 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 92 81 572


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where ITS-Tools computed more values than GreatSPN, denote cases where ITS-Tools computed less values than GreatSPN, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

ITS-Tools wins when points are below the diagonal, GreatSPN wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

ITS-Tools versus tedd-c

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 3234 runs (1617 for ITS-Tools and 1617 for tedd-c, so there are 1617 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing ITS-Tools to tedd-c are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  ITS-Tools tedd-c Both tools   ITS-Tools tedd-c
All computed OK 38 208 0   Smallest Memory Footprint
ITS-Tools = tedd-c 3 Times tool wins 696 456
ITS-Tools > tedd-c 0   Shortest Execution Time
ITS-Tools < tedd-c 903 Times tool wins 244 908
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 9 0 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 199 38 465


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where ITS-Tools computed more values than tedd-c, denote cases where ITS-Tools computed less values than tedd-c, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

ITS-Tools wins when points are below the diagonal, tedd-c wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

ITS-Tools versus tedd-s

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 3234 runs (1617 for ITS-Tools and 1617 for tedd-s, so there are 1617 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing ITS-Tools to tedd-s are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  ITS-Tools tedd-s Both tools   ITS-Tools tedd-s
All computed OK 40 200 0   Smallest Memory Footprint
ITS-Tools = tedd-s 2 Times tool wins 846 298
ITS-Tools > tedd-s 1   Shortest Execution Time
ITS-Tools < tedd-s 901 Times tool wins 242 902
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 9 0 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 191 40 473


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where ITS-Tools computed more values than tedd-s, denote cases where ITS-Tools computed less values than tedd-s, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

ITS-Tools wins when points are below the diagonal, tedd-s wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

ITS-Tools versus 2021-gold

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 3234 runs (1617 for ITS-Tools and 1617 for 2021-gold, so there are 1617 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing ITS-Tools to 2021-gold are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  ITS-Tools 2021-gold Both tools   ITS-Tools 2021-gold
All computed OK 88 193 0   Smallest Memory Footprint
ITS-Tools = 2021-gold 0 Times tool wins 876 261
ITS-Tools > 2021-gold 0   Shortest Execution Time
ITS-Tools < 2021-gold 856 Times tool wins 500 637
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 9 0 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 184 88 480


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where ITS-Tools computed more values than 2021-gold, denote cases where ITS-Tools computed less values than 2021-gold, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

ITS-Tools wins when points are below the diagonal, 2021-gold wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart