fond
Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
ITS-Tools compared to other tools («All» models, LTLFireability)
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

Introduction

This page presents how ITS-Tools do cope efficiently with the LTLFireability examination face to the other participating tools. In this page, we consider «All» models.

The next sections will show chart comparing performances in terms of both memory and execution time.The x-axis corresponds to the challenging tool where the y-axes represents ITS-Tools' performances. Thus, points below the diagonal of a chart denote comparisons favorables to the tool while others corresponds to situations where the challenging tool performs better.

You might also find plots out of the range that denote the case were at least one tool could not answer appropriately (error, time-out, could not compute or did not competed).

ITS-Tools versus GreatSPN

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 3234 runs (1617 for ITS-Tools and 1617 for GreatSPN, so there are 1617 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing ITS-Tools to GreatSPN are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  ITS-Tools GreatSPN Both tools   ITS-Tools GreatSPN
All computed OK 861 0 404   Smallest Memory Footprint
ITS-Tools = GreatSPN 5 Times tool wins 1295 314
ITS-Tools > GreatSPN 330   Shortest Execution Time
ITS-Tools < GreatSPN 9 Times tool wins 1239 370
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 2 111 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 0 752 6


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where ITS-Tools computed more values than GreatSPN, denote cases where ITS-Tools computed less values than GreatSPN, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

ITS-Tools wins when points are below the diagonal, GreatSPN wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

ITS-Tools versus Tapaal

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 3234 runs (1617 for ITS-Tools and 1617 for Tapaal, so there are 1617 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing ITS-Tools to Tapaal are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  ITS-Tools Tapaal Both tools   ITS-Tools Tapaal
All computed OK 10 5 839   Smallest Memory Footprint
ITS-Tools = Tapaal 159 Times tool wins 592 1022
ITS-Tools > Tapaal 409   Shortest Execution Time
ITS-Tools < Tapaal 192 Times tool wins 582 1032
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 2 0 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 3 10 3


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where ITS-Tools computed more values than Tapaal, denote cases where ITS-Tools computed less values than Tapaal, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

ITS-Tools wins when points are below the diagonal, Tapaal wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

ITS-Tools versus enPAC

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 3234 runs (1617 for ITS-Tools and 1617 for enPAC, so there are 1617 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing ITS-Tools to enPAC are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  ITS-Tools enPAC Both tools   ITS-Tools enPAC
All computed OK 41 6 461   Smallest Memory Footprint
ITS-Tools = enPAC 89 Times tool wins 1053 562
ITS-Tools > enPAC 916   Shortest Execution Time
ITS-Tools < enPAC 102 Times tool wins 772 843
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 2 10 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 5 32 1


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where ITS-Tools computed more values than enPAC, denote cases where ITS-Tools computed less values than enPAC, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

ITS-Tools wins when points are below the diagonal, enPAC wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

ITS-Tools versus 2021-gold

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 3234 runs (1617 for ITS-Tools and 1617 for 2021-gold, so there are 1617 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing ITS-Tools to 2021-gold are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  ITS-Tools 2021-gold Both tools   ITS-Tools 2021-gold
All computed OK 159 2 706   Smallest Memory Footprint
ITS-Tools = 2021-gold 126 Times tool wins 744 867
ITS-Tools > 2021-gold 481   Shortest Execution Time
ITS-Tools < 2021-gold 137 Times tool wins 686 925
Do not compete 0 116 0
Error detected 2 1 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 1 43 5


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where ITS-Tools computed more values than 2021-gold, denote cases where ITS-Tools computed less values than 2021-gold, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

ITS-Tools wins when points are below the diagonal, 2021-gold wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart