fond
Model Checking Contest 2021
11th edition, Paris, France, June 23, 2021
Execution of r216-tall-162098205600741
Last Updated
Jun 28, 2021

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldPPPt-PT-004A

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
375.027 19244.00 31617.00 381.10 FFFFFTTFFFFFTTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2021-input.r216-tall-162098205600741.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/data/fkordon/mcc2021-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-004A, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r216-tall-162098205600741
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 376K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 5 16:58 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 115K May 10 09:44 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 5 16:58 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 10 09:44 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 6 14:48 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 6 14:48 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Mar 28 16:39 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Mar 28 16:39 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Mar 28 16:39 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Mar 28 16:39 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Mar 27 12:31 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Mar 27 12:31 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.1K Mar 25 18:33 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Mar 25 18:33 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Mar 22 08:16 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Mar 22 08:16 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 5 16:52 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 5 16:52 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 5 16:52 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 5 16:52 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1621169981042

Running Version 0
[2021-05-16 12:59:42] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2021-05-16 12:59:42] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2021-05-16 12:59:42] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 40 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:42] [INFO ] Transformed 103 places.
[2021-05-16 12:59:42] [INFO ] Transformed 75 transitions.
[2021-05-16 12:59:42] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2021-05-16 12:59:42] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 103 places and 75 transitions in 78 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2021-05-16 12:59:42] [INFO ] Initial state test concluded for 2 properties.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Support contains 47 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 11 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 3 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 331 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for LTL removed 1 formulas.
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
Finished random walk after 1926 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 27 properties in 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=101 )
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(F((G(p0)||G(p1))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 4 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 101 transition count 72
Applied a total of 4 rules in 28 ms. Remains 101 /103 variables (removed 2) and now considering 72/74 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 2 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned [94]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 109 ms to find 1 implicit places.
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 100 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:43] [INFO ] Computed 44 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Starting structural reductions, iteration 1 : 100/103 places, 72/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 100 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 98 transition count 70
Applied a total of 4 rules in 9 ms. Remains 98 /100 variables (removed 2) and now considering 70/72 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 98 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Computed 44 place invariants in 4 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [81, 85]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 2 : 96/103 places, 70/74 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 95 transition count 69
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 95 /96 variables (removed 1) and now considering 69/70 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 95 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Computed 42 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 95 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Computed 42 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Finished structural reductions, in 3 iterations. Remains : 95/103 places, 69/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 125 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-00 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0, 1} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={1} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (EQ s11 0) (EQ s21 0)), p1:(OR (NEQ s80 1) (NEQ s89 1))], nbAcceptance=2, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 417 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 379 steps with 0 reset with depth 380 and stack size 377 in 2 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-00 finished in 1080 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 4 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 101 transition count 72
Applied a total of 4 rules in 10 ms. Remains 101 /103 variables (removed 2) and now considering 72/74 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [94]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 1 implicit places.
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 100 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Computed 44 place invariants in 2 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Starting structural reductions, iteration 1 : 100/103 places, 72/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 100 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 98 transition count 70
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 98 /100 variables (removed 2) and now considering 70/72 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 98 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:44] [INFO ] Computed 44 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [81, 85]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 2 : 96/103 places, 70/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 94 transition count 68
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 94 /96 variables (removed 2) and now considering 68/70 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 94 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Computed 42 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 94 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Computed 42 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Finished structural reductions, in 3 iterations. Remains : 94/103 places, 68/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-01 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (NEQ s54 1) (NEQ s73 1)), p1:(AND (EQ s62 1) (EQ s64 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 244 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 11 steps with 0 reset with depth 12 and stack size 12 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-01 finished in 692 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !((G(p0)&&F(p1)))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 4 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 101 transition count 72
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 101 /103 variables (removed 2) and now considering 72/74 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [94]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 1 implicit places.
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 100 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Computed 44 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Starting structural reductions, iteration 1 : 100/103 places, 72/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 100 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 98 transition count 70
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 98 /100 variables (removed 2) and now considering 70/72 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 98 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Computed 44 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [81, 85]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 2 : 96/103 places, 70/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 94 transition count 68
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 94 /96 variables (removed 2) and now considering 68/70 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 94 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Computed 42 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 94 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Computed 42 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Finished structural reductions, in 3 iterations. Remains : 94/103 places, 68/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 57 ms :[(NOT p0), true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-02 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=2, aps=[p0:(OR (NEQ s55 1) (NEQ s72 1)), p1:(OR (NEQ s7 1) (NEQ s9 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 19 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-02 finished in 418 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(F(G((p0 U X(p1)))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 6 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:45] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:46] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:46] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-03 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s30 1) (EQ s47 1) (EQ s81 1) (EQ s96 1)), p1:(AND (EQ s37 1) (EQ s39 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 317 reset in 355 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 8 steps with 0 reset with depth 9 and stack size 9 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-03 finished in 639 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !((G(p0)&&F((!p1||X(p2)))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 5 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:46] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:46] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:46] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 94 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))), true]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-04 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(OR (AND p0 (NOT p1)) (AND p0 p2)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(OR (EQ s90 1) (EQ s12 0) (EQ s14 0)), p1:(OR (NEQ s55 1) (NEQ s72 1)), p2:(AND (EQ s12 1) (EQ s14 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 111 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-04 finished in 295 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X((X(G(p0))||(p1 U (p2||G(p1))))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 6 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:46] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 186 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:47] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 273 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:47] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 6 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:47] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 140 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-05 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=1, aps=[p2:(AND (OR (NEQ s83 1) (NEQ s100 1)) (OR (NEQ s13 1) (NEQ s27 1))), p1:(OR (NEQ s13 1) (NEQ s27 1)), p0:(AND (EQ s11 1) (EQ s21 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 251 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 243 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [p2, p1, (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 224 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 240 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, true, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 123 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 6 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-16 12:59:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:48] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:48] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 222 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 235 ms.
[2021-05-16 12:59:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL13588385066705932253.gal : 3 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL9630105036326896581.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, -i, /tmp/LTL13588385066705932253.gal, -t, CGAL, -LTL, /tmp/LTL9630105036326896581.ltl, -c, -stutter-deadlock, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/LTL13588385066705932253.gal -t CGAL -LTL /tmp/LTL9630105036326896581.ltl -c -stutter-deadlock --gen-order FOLLOW
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X((X(G("((p11==1)&&(p21==1))")))||(("((p13==0)||(p27==0))")U(("(((p83==0)||(p100==0))&&((p13==0)||(p27==0)))")||(G("((p13==0)||(p27==0))")))))))
Formula 0 simplified : !X(XG"((p11==1)&&(p21==1))" | ("((p13==0)||(p27==0))" U ("(((p83==0)||(p100==0))&&((p13==0)||(p27==0)))" | G"((p13==0)||(p27==0))")))
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
2 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
1 transitions explored
2 items max in DFS search stack
23 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.259922,25464,1,0,6,38183,21,0,2414,57328,9
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-05 finished in 2860 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X(X(F((X(p1)||p0)))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 7 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:49] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 7 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:49] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 5 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:49] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 6 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 89 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-06 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}]], initial=2, aps=[p0:(OR (NEQ s38 1) (NEQ s52 1) (AND (OR (NEQ s86 1) (NEQ s96 1)) (OR (NEQ s45 1) (NEQ s60 1)))), p1:(NEQ s24 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 195 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 190 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [p0, p1]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 89 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 178 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 231 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 108 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 7 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 103 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 1 rules in 4 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-16 12:59:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:51] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 267 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 232 ms.
[2021-05-16 12:59:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14381123242206936293.gal : 12 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL9840199711885807826.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, -i, /tmp/LTL14381123242206936293.gal, -t, CGAL, -LTL, /tmp/LTL9840199711885807826.ltl, -c, -stutter-deadlock, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/LTL14381123242206936293.gal -t CGAL -LTL /tmp/LTL9840199711885807826.ltl -c -stutter-deadlock --gen-order FOLLOW
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X(F((("((p38==0)||(p52==0))")||(X("(p24==0)")))||("(((p86==0)||(p96==0))&&((p45==0)||(p60==0)))"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : !XXF("(((p86==0)||(p96==0))&&((p45==0)||(p60==0)))" | "((p38==0)||(p52==0))" | X"(p24==0)")
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
3 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
2 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
24 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.250831,25028,1,0,7,38183,18,0,2446,57328,10
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-06 finished in 2277 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(G((X(X(p0))&&F((X(p2)&&p1)))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 5 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 146 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (NOT p0), true]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-07 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=p1, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 5}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (EQ s30 1) (EQ s47 1)), p2:(EQ s70 1), p0:(AND (EQ s11 1) (EQ s21 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-07 finished in 352 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X((G(p0)&&F(p1)&&(p2||X(p2)))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 5 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND p0 (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-08 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 5}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s57 1) (EQ s59 1)), p1:(NEQ s22 1), p2:(AND (EQ s37 1) (EQ s39 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-08 finished in 346 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X(X((X(p0)&&F(!p0)))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 1 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 194 ms :[true, true, true, (NOT p0), p0, true]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-09 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 5}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(EQ s74 1)], nbAcceptance=0, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-09 finished in 374 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(F(G(p0)))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 3 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 101 transition count 72
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 101 /103 variables (removed 2) and now considering 72/74 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [94]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 1 implicit places.
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 100 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Computed 44 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Starting structural reductions, iteration 1 : 100/103 places, 72/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 100 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 98 transition count 70
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 98 /100 variables (removed 2) and now considering 70/72 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 98 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Computed 44 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [81, 85]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 2 : 96/103 places, 70/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 94 transition count 68
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 94 /96 variables (removed 2) and now considering 68/70 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 94 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Computed 42 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 94 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Computed 42 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Finished structural reductions, in 3 iterations. Remains : 94/103 places, 68/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 23 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-10 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (NEQ s92 0) (OR (NEQ s92 1) (NEQ s58 1) (NEQ s75 1)))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 213 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 40 steps with 0 reset with depth 41 and stack size 41 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-10 finished in 650 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X((p0||F((p1||X(X(p2)))))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 4 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:53] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-12 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(EQ s70 1), p0:(EQ s49 1), p2:(OR (NEQ s87 1) (NEQ s89 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 178 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 193 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (NOT p0), p2]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 177 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 192 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 88 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Support contains 4 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-16 12:59:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:55] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 390 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 383 ms.
[2021-05-16 12:59:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL13966542642945318884.gal : 2 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2562301585003683691.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, -i, /tmp/LTL13966542642945318884.gal, -t, CGAL, -LTL, /tmp/LTL2562301585003683691.ltl, -c, -stutter-deadlock, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/LTL13966542642945318884.gal -t CGAL -LTL /tmp/LTL2562301585003683691.ltl -c -stutter-deadlock --gen-order FOLLOW
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(("(p49==1)")||(F(("(p70==1)")||(X(X("((p87==0)||(p89==0))"))))))))
Formula 0 simplified : !X("(p49==1)" | F("(p70==1)" | XX"((p87==0)||(p89==0))"))
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
4 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
24 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.254971,24992,1,0,8,38183,30,0,2439,57328,19
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-12 finished in 2472 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X((p0||X((G(p0)&&p1)))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 3 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:56] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:56] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:56] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 95 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-13 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(NEQ s95 1), p1:(AND (NEQ s36 0) (NEQ s46 0))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 209 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 221 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 91 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 205 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 218 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 3 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 103 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 1 rules in 4 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-16 12:59:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:57] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 206 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 220 ms.
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL184481928579712492.gal : 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL1383713920328996497.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, -i, /tmp/LTL184481928579712492.gal, -t, CGAL, -LTL, /tmp/LTL1383713920328996497.ltl, -c, -stutter-deadlock, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/LTL184481928579712492.gal -t CGAL -LTL /tmp/LTL1383713920328996497.ltl -c -stutter-deadlock --gen-order FOLLOW
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(("(p95==0)")||(X(("((p36==1)&&(p46==1))")&&(G("(p95==0)")))))))
Formula 0 simplified : !X("(p95==0)" | X("((p36==1)&&(p46==1))" & G"(p95==0)"))
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
2 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
1 transitions explored
2 items max in DFS search stack
25 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.26184,25156,1,0,6,38183,14,0,2398,57328,7
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-13 finished in 2235 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(F(G(!p0)))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 2 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 100 transition count 72
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 100 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 99 transition count 71
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 98 transition count 70
Applied a total of 7 rules in 6 ms. Remains 98 /103 variables (removed 5) and now considering 70/74 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 98 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Computed 44 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [80]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 1 implicit places.
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 97 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Computed 43 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Starting structural reductions, iteration 1 : 97/103 places, 70/74 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 96 transition count 69
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 96 /97 variables (removed 1) and now considering 69/70 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 96 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Computed 43 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 96 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Computed 43 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 96/103 places, 69/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 22 ms :[p0]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-14 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (NEQ s83 1) (NEQ s85 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 199 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 173 steps with 0 reset with depth 174 and stack size 174 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-14 finished in 478 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X((p0&&G((p0||X((X(p1) U (p0&&X(p1)))))))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 3 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:58] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 103 cols
[2021-05-16 12:59:59] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-16 12:59:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 103/103 places, 74/74 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 118 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true, (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-15 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}, { cond=true, acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(EQ s97 1), p1:(AND (EQ s61 1) (EQ s71 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004A-15 finished in 302 ms.
All properties solved without resorting to model-checking.

BK_STOP 1621170000286

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ cut -d . -f 9
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202104292328.jar
+ VERSION=0
+ echo 'Running Version 0'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data /home/mcc/execution/workspace -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/.eclipse -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx16000m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-004A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-004A, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r216-tall-162098205600741"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-004A.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-004A execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;