Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2021-input.r178-tajo-162089416000549.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2021-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is Referendum-PT-0100, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r178-tajo-162089416000549
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 2.5M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 179K May 5 16:58 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 848K May 10 09:44 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 5 16:58 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 545K May 10 09:44 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 6 14:48 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 6 14:48 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K Mar 28 16:31 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 158K Mar 28 16:31 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Mar 28 16:31 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 149K Mar 28 16:31 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Mar 27 10:31 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K Mar 27 10:31 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K Mar 25 13:43 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 159K Mar 25 13:43 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K Mar 22 08:15 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Mar 22 08:15 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 5 16:51 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 5 16:51 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 5 16:51 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K May 5 16:51 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-00
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-01
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-02
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-03
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-04
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-05
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-06
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-07
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-08
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-09
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-10
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-11
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-12
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-13
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-14
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1621260656516

Running Version 0
[2021-05-17 14:10:58] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2021-05-17 14:10:58] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2021-05-17 14:10:58] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 65 ms
[2021-05-17 14:10:58] [INFO ] Transformed 301 places.
[2021-05-17 14:10:58] [INFO ] Transformed 201 transitions.
[2021-05-17 14:10:58] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2021-05-17 14:10:58] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 301 places and 201 transitions in 113 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 21 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2021-05-17 14:10:58] [INFO ] Initial state test concluded for 2 properties.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 101 out of 301 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 301/301 places, 201/201 transitions.
Reduce places removed 200 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 300 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 101 transition count 101
Applied a total of 300 rules in 9 ms. Remains 101 /301 variables (removed 200) and now considering 101/201 (removed 100) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:10:59] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 8 ms
[2021-05-17 14:10:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:10:59] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 2 ms
[2021-05-17 14:10:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 200 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:10:59] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 5 ms
[2021-05-17 14:10:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 101/301 places, 101/201 transitions.
[2021-05-17 14:10:59] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for LTL removed 2 formulas.
[2021-05-17 14:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2021-05-17 14:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2021-05-17 14:10:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 980 resets, run finished after 388 ms. (steps per millisecond=257 ) properties (out of 15) seen :13
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 2 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 56 ms returned unsat
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(G(F(p0)))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 100 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 178 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-00 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (EQ s1 1) (EQ s66 1) (EQ s5 1) (EQ s70 1) (EQ s9 1) (EQ s74 1) (EQ s13 1) (EQ s78 1) (EQ s17 1) (EQ s82 1) (EQ s21 1) (EQ s86 1) (EQ s25 1) (EQ s90 1) (EQ s29 1) (EQ s94 1) (EQ s33 1) (EQ s98 1) (EQ s37 1) (EQ s41 1) (EQ s45 1) (EQ s49 1) (EQ s53 1) (EQ s57 1) (EQ s61 1) (EQ s65 1) (EQ s4 1) (EQ s69 1) (EQ s8 1) (EQ s73 1) (EQ s12 1) (EQ s77 1) (EQ s16 1) (EQ s81 1) (EQ s20 1) (EQ s85 1) (EQ s24 1) (EQ s89 1) (EQ s28 1) (EQ s93 1) (EQ s32 1) (EQ s97 1) (EQ s36 1) (EQ s40 1) (EQ s44 1) (EQ s48 1) (EQ s52 1) (EQ s56 1) (EQ s60 1) (EQ s64 1) (EQ s3 1) (EQ s68 1) (EQ s7 1) (EQ s72 1) (EQ s11 1) (EQ s76 1) (EQ s15 1) (EQ s80 1) (EQ s19 1) (EQ s84 1) (EQ s23 1) (EQ s88 1) (EQ s27 1) (EQ s92 1) (EQ s31 1) (EQ s96 1) (EQ s35 1) (EQ s100 1) (EQ s39 1) (EQ s43 1) (EQ s47 1) (EQ s51 1) (EQ s55 1) (EQ s59 1) (EQ s63 1) (EQ s2 1) (EQ s67 1) (EQ s6 1) (EQ s71 1) (EQ s10 1) (EQ s75 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s79 1) (EQ s18 1) (EQ s83 1) (EQ s22 1) (EQ s87 1) (EQ s26 1) (EQ s91 1) (EQ s30 1) (EQ s95 1) (EQ s34 1) (EQ s99 1) (EQ s38 1) (EQ s42 1) (EQ s46 1) (EQ s50 1) (EQ s54 1) (EQ s58 1) (EQ s62 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 103 steps with 1 reset in 3 ms.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-00 finished in 390 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X(X((X(p0)||G(!p0)))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 100 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 4 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:00] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 208 ms :[true, (NOT p0), false, false, p0, false, false]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-01 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=5 dest: 6}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=6 dest: 3}]], initial=5, aps=[p0:(OR (EQ s1 1) (EQ s66 1) (EQ s5 1) (EQ s70 1) (EQ s9 1) (EQ s74 1) (EQ s13 1) (EQ s78 1) (EQ s17 1) (EQ s82 1) (EQ s21 1) (EQ s86 1) (EQ s25 1) (EQ s90 1) (EQ s29 1) (EQ s94 1) (EQ s33 1) (EQ s98 1) (EQ s37 1) (EQ s41 1) (EQ s45 1) (EQ s49 1) (EQ s53 1) (EQ s57 1) (EQ s61 1) (EQ s65 1) (EQ s4 1) (EQ s69 1) (EQ s8 1) (EQ s73 1) (EQ s12 1) (EQ s77 1) (EQ s16 1) (EQ s81 1) (EQ s20 1) (EQ s85 1) (EQ s24 1) (EQ s89 1) (EQ s28 1) (EQ s93 1) (EQ s32 1) (EQ s97 1) (EQ s36 1) (EQ s40 1) (EQ s44 1) (EQ s48 1) (EQ s52 1) (EQ s56 1) (EQ s60 1) (EQ s64 1) (EQ s3 1) (EQ s68 1) (EQ s7 1) (EQ s72 1) (EQ s11 1) (EQ s76 1) (EQ s15 1) (EQ s80 1) (EQ s19 1) (EQ s84 1) (EQ s23 1) (EQ s88 1) (EQ s27 1) (EQ s92 1) (EQ s31 1) (EQ s96 1) (EQ s35 1) (EQ s100 1) (EQ s39 1) (EQ s43 1) (EQ s47 1) (EQ s51 1) (EQ s55 1) (EQ s59 1) (EQ s63 1) (EQ s2 1) (EQ s67 1) (EQ s6 1) (EQ s71 1) (EQ s10 1) (EQ s75 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s79 1) (EQ s18 1) (EQ s83 1) (EQ s22 1) (EQ s87 1) (EQ s26 1) (EQ s91 1) (EQ s30 1) (EQ s95 1) (EQ s34 1) (EQ s99 1) (EQ s38 1) (EQ s42 1) (EQ s46 1) (EQ s50 1) (EQ s54 1) (EQ s58 1) (EQ s62 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 809 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 579 ms.
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 101 transition count 101
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(F (G (NOT p0))), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 179 ms :[true, (NOT p0), false, false, p0, false, false]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 452 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 468 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, true, true, false, true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 484 ms :[true, (NOT p0), false, false, p0, false, false]
Support contains 100 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-17 14:11:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:04] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:04] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 779 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 829 ms.
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL2783494513374125092.gal : 3 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL14902422684162164340.ltl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, -i, /tmp/LTL2783494513374125092.gal, -t, CGAL, -LTL, /tmp/LTL14902422684162164340.ltl, -c, -stutter-deadlock, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/LTL2783494513374125092.gal -t CGAL -LTL /tmp/LTL14902422684162164340.ltl -c -stutter-deadlock --gen-order FOLLOW
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X((X("((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((voting_1==1)||(voting_66==1))||(voting_5==1))||(voting_70==1))||(voting_9==1))||(voting_74==1))||(voting_13==1))||(voting_78==1))||(voting_17==1))||(voting_82==1))||(voting_21==1))||(voting_86==1))||(voting_25==1))||(voting_90==1))||(voting_29==1))||(voting_94==1))||(voting_33==1))||(voting_98==1))||(voting_37==1))||(voting_41==1))||(voting_45==1))||(voting_49==1))||(voting_53==1))||(voting_57==1))||(voting_61==1))||(voting_65==1))||(voting_4==1))||(voting_69==1))||(voting_8==1))||(voting_73==1))||(voting_12==1))||(voting_77==1))||(voting_16==1))||(voting_81==1))||(voting_20==1))||(voting_85==1))||(voting_24==1))||(voting_89==1))||(voting_28==1))||(voting_93==1))||(voting_32==1))||(voting_97==1))||(voting_36==1))||(voting_40==1))||(voting_44==1))||(voting_48==1))||(voting_52==1))||(voting_56==1))||(voting_60==1))||(voting_64==1))||(voting_3==1))||(voting_68==1))||(voting_7==1))||(voting_72==1))||(voting_11==1))||(voting_76==1))||(voting_15==1))||(voting_80==1))||(voting_19==1))||(voting_84==1))||(voting_23==1))||(voting_88==1))||(voting_27==1))||(voting_92==1))||(voting_31==1))||(voting_96==1))||(voting_35==1))||(voting_100==1))||(voting_39==1))||(voting_43==1))||(voting_47==1))||(voting_51==1))||(voting_55==1))||(voting_59==1))||(voting_63==1))||(voting_2==1))||(voting_67==1))||(voting_6==1))||(voting_71==1))||(voting_10==1))||(voting_75==1))||(voting_14==1))||(voting_79==1))||(voting_18==1))||(voting_83==1))||(voting_22==1))||(voting_87==1))||(voting_26==1))||(voting_91==1))||(voting_30==1))||(voting_95==1))||(voting_34==1))||(voting_99==1))||(voting_38==1))||(voting_42==1))||(voting_46==1))||(voting_50==1))||(voting_54==1))||(voting_58==1))||(voting_62==1))"))||(G("((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((voting_1==0)&&(voting_66==0))&&(voting_5==0))&&(voting_70==0))&&(voting_9==0))&&(voting_74==0))&&(voting_13==0))&&(voting_78==0))&&(voting_17==0))&&(voting_82==0))&&(voting_21==0))&&(voting_86==0))&&(voting_25==0))&&(voting_90==0))&&(voting_29==0))&&(voting_94==0))&&(voting_33==0))&&(voting_98==0))&&(voting_37==0))&&(voting_41==0))&&(voting_45==0))&&(voting_49==0))&&(voting_53==0))&&(voting_57==0))&&(voting_61==0))&&(voting_65==0))&&(voting_4==0))&&(voting_69==0))&&(voting_8==0))&&(voting_73==0))&&(voting_12==0))&&(voting_77==0))&&(voting_16==0))&&(voting_81==0))&&(voting_20==0))&&(voting_85==0))&&(voting_24==0))&&(voting_89==0))&&(voting_28==0))&&(voting_93==0))&&(voting_32==0))&&(voting_97==0))&&(voting_36==0))&&(voting_40==0))&&(voting_44==0))&&(voting_48==0))&&(voting_52==0))&&(voting_56==0))&&(voting_60==0))&&(voting_64==0))&&(voting_3==0))&&(voting_68==0))&&(voting_7==0))&&(voting_72==0))&&(voting_11==0))&&(voting_76==0))&&(voting_15==0))&&(voting_80==0))&&(voting_19==0))&&(voting_84==0))&&(voting_23==0))&&(voting_88==0))&&(voting_27==0))&&(voting_92==0))&&(voting_31==0))&&(voting_96==0))&&(voting_35==0))&&(voting_100==0))&&(voting_39==0))&&(voting_43==0))&&(voting_47==0))&&(voting_51==0))&&(voting_55==0))&&(voting_59==0))&&(voting_63==0))&&(voting_2==0))&&(voting_67==0))&&(voting_6==0))&&(voting_71==0))&&(voting_10==0))&&(voting_75==0))&&(voting_14==0))&&(voting_79==0))&&(voting_18==0))&&(voting_83==0))&&(voting_22==0))&&(voting_87==0))&&(voting_26==0))&&(voting_91==0))&&(voting_30==0))&&(voting_95==0))&&(voting_34==0))&&(voting_99==0))&&(voting_38==0))&&(voting_42==0))&&(voting_46==0))&&(voting_50==0))&&(voting_54==0))&&(voting_58==0))&&(voting_62==0))"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : !XX(X"((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((voting_1==1)||(voting_66==1))||(voting_5==1))||(voting_70==1))||(voting_9==1))||(voting_74==1))||(voting_13==1))||(voting_78==1))||(voting_17==1))||(voting_82==1))||(voting_21==1))||(voting_86==1))||(voting_25==1))||(voting_90==1))||(voting_29==1))||(voting_94==1))||(voting_33==1))||(voting_98==1))||(voting_37==1))||(voting_41==1))||(voting_45==1))||(voting_49==1))||(voting_53==1))||(voting_57==1))||(voting_61==1))||(voting_65==1))||(voting_4==1))||(voting_69==1))||(voting_8==1))||(voting_73==1))||(voting_12==1))||(voting_77==1))||(voting_16==1))||(voting_81==1))||(voting_20==1))||(voting_85==1))||(voting_24==1))||(voting_89==1))||(voting_28==1))||(voting_93==1))||(voting_32==1))||(voting_97==1))||(voting_36==1))||(voting_40==1))||(voting_44==1))||(voting_48==1))||(voting_52==1))||(voting_56==1))||(voting_60==1))||(voting_64==1))||(voting_3==1))||(voting_68==1))||(voting_7==1))||(voting_72==1))||(voting_11==1))||(voting_76==1))||(voting_15==1))||(voting_80==1))||(voting_19==1))||(voting_84==1))||(voting_23==1))||(voting_88==1))||(voting_27==1))||(voting_92==1))||(voting_31==1))||(voting_96==1))||(voting_35==1))||(voting_100==1))||(voting_39==1))||(voting_43==1))||(voting_47==1))||(voting_51==1))||(voting_55==1))||(voting_59==1))||(voting_63==1))||(voting_2==1))||(voting_67==1))||(voting_6==1))||(voting_71==1))||(voting_10==1))||(voting_75==1))||(voting_14==1))||(voting_79==1))||(voting_18==1))||(voting_83==1))||(voting_22==1))||(voting_87==1))||(voting_26==1))||(voting_91==1))||(voting_30==1))||(voting_95==1))||(voting_34==1))||(voting_99==1))||(voting_38==1))||(voting_42==1))||(voting_46==1))||(voting_50==1))||(voting_54==1))||(voting_58==1))||(voting_62==1))" | G"((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((voting_1==0)&&(voting_66==0))&&(voting_5==0))&&(voting_70==0))&&(voting_9==0))&&(voting_74==0))&&(voting_13==0))&&(voting_78==0))&&(voting_17==0))&&(voting_82==0))&&(voting_21==0))&&(voting_86==0))&&(voting_25==0))&&(voting_90==0))&&(voting_29==0))&&(voting_94==0))&&(voting_33==0))&&(voting_98==0))&&(voting_37==0))&&(voting_41==0))&&(voting_45==0))&&(voting_49==0))&&(voting_53==0))&&(voting_57==0))&&(voting_61==0))&&(voting_65==0))&&(voting_4==0))&&(voting_69==0))&&(voting_8==0))&&(voting_73==0))&&(voting_12==0))&&(voting_77==0))&&(voting_16==0))&&(voting_81==0))&&(voting_20==0))&&(voting_85==0))&&(voting_24==0))&&(voting_89==0))&&(voting_28==0))&&(voting_93==0))&&(voting_32==0))&&(voting_97==0))&&(voting_36==0))&&(voting_40==0))&&(voting_44==0))&&(voting_48==0))&&(voting_52==0))&&(voting_56==0))&&(voting_60==0))&&(voting_64==0))&&(voting_3==0))&&(voting_68==0))&&(voting_7==0))&&(voting_72==0))&&(voting_11==0))&&(voting_76==0))&&(voting_15==0))&&(voting_80==0))&&(voting_19==0))&&(voting_84==0))&&(voting_23==0))&&(voting_88==0))&&(voting_27==0))&&(voting_92==0))&&(voting_31==0))&&(voting_96==0))&&(voting_35==0))&&(voting_100==0))&&(voting_39==0))&&(voting_43==0))&&(voting_47==0))&&(voting_51==0))&&(voting_55==0))&&(voting_59==0))&&(voting_63==0))&&(voting_2==0))&&(voting_67==0))&&(voting_6==0))&&(voting_71==0))&&(voting_10==0))&&(voting_75==0))&&(voting_14==0))&&(voting_79==0))&&(voting_18==0))&&(voting_83==0))&&(voting_22==0))&&(voting_87==0))&&(voting_26==0))&&(voting_91==0))&&(voting_30==0))&&(voting_95==0))&&(voting_34==0))&&(voting_99==0))&&(voting_38==0))&&(voting_42==0))&&(voting_46==0))&&(voting_50==0))&&(voting_54==0))&&(voting_58==0))&&(voting_62==0))")
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t76, t77, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, t92, t93, t94, t95, t96, t97, t98, t99, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0/1/100/101
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1 deadlock states
4 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
34 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.364018,20960,1,0,314,22890,224,108,3210,12897,222
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-01 finished in 5860 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(F(G(p0)))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 100 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 30 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-03 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (EQ s1 1) (EQ s66 1) (EQ s5 1) (EQ s70 1) (EQ s9 1) (EQ s74 1) (EQ s13 1) (EQ s78 1) (EQ s17 1) (EQ s82 1) (EQ s21 1) (EQ s86 1) (EQ s25 1) (EQ s90 1) (EQ s29 1) (EQ s94 1) (EQ s33 1) (EQ s98 1) (EQ s37 1) (EQ s41 1) (EQ s45 1) (EQ s49 1) (EQ s53 1) (EQ s57 1) (EQ s61 1) (EQ s65 1) (EQ s4 1) (EQ s69 1) (EQ s8 1) (EQ s73 1) (EQ s12 1) (EQ s77 1) (EQ s16 1) (EQ s81 1) (EQ s20 1) (EQ s85 1) (EQ s24 1) (EQ s89 1) (EQ s28 1) (EQ s93 1) (EQ s32 1) (EQ s97 1) (EQ s36 1) (EQ s40 1) (EQ s44 1) (EQ s48 1) (EQ s52 1) (EQ s56 1) (EQ s60 1) (EQ s64 1) (EQ s3 1) (EQ s68 1) (EQ s7 1) (EQ s72 1) (EQ s11 1) (EQ s76 1) (EQ s15 1) (EQ s80 1) (EQ s19 1) (EQ s84 1) (EQ s23 1) (EQ s88 1) (EQ s27 1) (EQ s92 1) (EQ s31 1) (EQ s96 1) (EQ s35 1) (EQ s100 1) (EQ s39 1) (EQ s43 1) (EQ s47 1) (EQ s51 1) (EQ s55 1) (EQ s59 1) (EQ s63 1) (EQ s2 1) (EQ s67 1) (EQ s6 1) (EQ s71 1) (EQ s10 1) (EQ s75 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s79 1) (EQ s18 1) (EQ s83 1) (EQ s22 1) (EQ s87 1) (EQ s26 1) (EQ s91 1) (EQ s30 1) (EQ s95 1) (EQ s34 1) (EQ s99 1) (EQ s38 1) (EQ s42 1) (EQ s46 1) (EQ s50 1) (EQ s54 1) (EQ s58 1) (EQ s62 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 101 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-03 finished in 233 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(G(F(p0)))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 100 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 62 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-04 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (EQ s1 1) (EQ s66 1) (EQ s5 1) (EQ s70 1) (EQ s9 1) (EQ s74 1) (EQ s13 1) (EQ s78 1) (EQ s17 1) (EQ s82 1) (EQ s21 1) (EQ s86 1) (EQ s25 1) (EQ s90 1) (EQ s29 1) (EQ s94 1) (EQ s33 1) (EQ s98 1) (EQ s37 1) (EQ s41 1) (EQ s45 1) (EQ s49 1) (EQ s53 1) (EQ s57 1) (EQ s61 1) (EQ s65 1) (EQ s4 1) (EQ s69 1) (EQ s8 1) (EQ s73 1) (EQ s12 1) (EQ s77 1) (EQ s16 1) (EQ s81 1) (EQ s20 1) (EQ s85 1) (EQ s24 1) (EQ s89 1) (EQ s28 1) (EQ s93 1) (EQ s32 1) (EQ s97 1) (EQ s36 1) (EQ s40 1) (EQ s44 1) (EQ s48 1) (EQ s52 1) (EQ s56 1) (EQ s60 1) (EQ s64 1) (EQ s3 1) (EQ s68 1) (EQ s7 1) (EQ s72 1) (EQ s11 1) (EQ s76 1) (EQ s15 1) (EQ s80 1) (EQ s19 1) (EQ s84 1) (EQ s23 1) (EQ s88 1) (EQ s27 1) (EQ s92 1) (EQ s31 1) (EQ s96 1) (EQ s35 1) (EQ s100 1) (EQ s39 1) (EQ s43 1) (EQ s47 1) (EQ s51 1) (EQ s55 1) (EQ s59 1) (EQ s63 1) (EQ s2 1) (EQ s67 1) (EQ s6 1) (EQ s71 1) (EQ s10 1) (EQ s75 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s79 1) (EQ s18 1) (EQ s83 1) (EQ s22 1) (EQ s87 1) (EQ s26 1) (EQ s91 1) (EQ s30 1) (EQ s95 1) (EQ s34 1) (EQ s99 1) (EQ s38 1) (EQ s42 1) (EQ s46 1) (EQ s50 1) (EQ s54 1) (EQ s58 1) (EQ s62 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 101 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-04 finished in 249 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X((X((p1&&F(G(p2))))||p0)))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 101 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 19 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:06] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:07] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 259 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-05 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}, { cond=p2, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (EQ s1 1) (EQ s66 1) (EQ s5 1) (EQ s70 1) (EQ s9 1) (EQ s74 1) (EQ s13 1) (EQ s78 1) (EQ s17 1) (EQ s82 1) (EQ s21 1) (EQ s86 1) (EQ s25 1) (EQ s90 1) (EQ s29 1) (EQ s94 1) (EQ s33 1) (EQ s98 1) (EQ s37 1) (EQ s41 1) (EQ s45 1) (EQ s49 1) (EQ s53 1) (EQ s57 1) (EQ s61 1) (EQ s65 1) (EQ s4 1) (EQ s69 1) (EQ s8 1) (EQ s73 1) (EQ s12 1) (EQ s77 1) (EQ s16 1) (EQ s81 1) (EQ s20 1) (EQ s85 1) (EQ s24 1) (EQ s89 1) (EQ s28 1) (EQ s93 1) (EQ s32 1) (EQ s97 1) (EQ s36 1) (EQ s40 1) (EQ s44 1) (EQ s48 1) (EQ s52 1) (EQ s56 1) (EQ s60 1) (EQ s64 1) (EQ s3 1) (EQ s68 1) (EQ s7 1) (EQ s72 1) (EQ s11 1) (EQ s76 1) (EQ s15 1) (EQ s80 1) (EQ s19 1) (EQ s84 1) (EQ s23 1) (EQ s88 1) (EQ s27 1) (EQ s92 1) (EQ s31 1) (EQ s96 1) (EQ s35 1) (EQ s100 1) (EQ s39 1) (EQ s43 1) (EQ s47 1) (EQ s51 1) (EQ s55 1) (EQ s59 1) (EQ s63 1) (EQ s2 1) (EQ s67 1) (EQ s6 1) (EQ s71 1) (EQ s10 1) (EQ s75 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s79 1) (EQ s18 1) (EQ s83 1) (EQ s22 1) (EQ s87 1) (EQ s26 1) (EQ s91 1) (EQ s30 1) (EQ s95 1) (EQ s34 1) (EQ s99 1) (EQ s38 1) (EQ s42 1) (EQ s46 1) (EQ s50 1) (EQ s54 1) (EQ s58 1) (EQ s62 1)), p1:(EQ s0 1), p2:(OR (EQ s1 1) (EQ s66 1) (EQ s5 1) (EQ s70 1) (EQ s9 1) (EQ s74 1) (EQ s13 1) (EQ s78 1) (EQ s17 1) (EQ s82 1) (EQ s21 1) (EQ s86 1) (EQ s25 1) (EQ s90 1) (EQ s29 1) (EQ s94 1) (EQ s33 1) (EQ s98 1) (EQ s37 1) (EQ s41 1) (EQ s45 1) (EQ s49 1) (EQ s53 1) (EQ s57 1) (EQ s61 1) (EQ s65 1) (EQ s4 1) (EQ s69 1) (EQ s8 1) (EQ s73 1) (EQ s12 1) (EQ s77 1) (EQ s16 1) (EQ s81 1) (EQ s20 1) (EQ s85 1) (EQ s24 1) (EQ s89 1) (EQ s28 1) (EQ s93 1) (EQ s32 1) (EQ s97 1) (EQ s36 1) (EQ s40 1) (EQ s44 1) (EQ s48 1) (EQ s52 1) (EQ s56 1) (EQ s60 1) (EQ s64 1) (EQ s3 1) (EQ s68 1) (EQ s7 1) (EQ s72 1) (EQ s11 1) (EQ s76 1) (EQ s15 1) (EQ s80 1) (EQ s19 1) (EQ s84 1) (EQ s23 1) (EQ s88 1) (EQ s27 1) (EQ s92 1) (EQ s31 1) (EQ s96 1) (EQ s35 1) (EQ s100 1) (EQ s39 1) (EQ s43 1) (EQ s47 1) (EQ s51 1) (EQ s55 1) (EQ s59 1) (EQ s63 1) (EQ s2 1) (EQ s67 1) (EQ s6 1) (EQ s71 1) (EQ s10 1) (EQ s75 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s79 1) (EQ s18 1) (EQ s83 1) (EQ s22 1) (EQ s87 1) (EQ s26 1) (EQ s91 1) (EQ s30 1) (EQ s95 1) (EQ s34 1) (EQ s99 1) (EQ s38 1) (EQ s42 1) (EQ s46 1) (EQ s50 1) (EQ s54 1) (EQ s58 1) (EQ s62 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 504 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 577 ms.
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 101 transition count 101
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), p1, (NOT p2)]
Adopting property with smaller alphabet thanks to knowledge :(F (G (NOT p2)))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Support contains 100 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:08] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:08] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:09] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:09] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 114 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 389 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 423 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 155 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Support contains 100 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-17 14:11:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:10] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 551 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 560 ms.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:11] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:11] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 2 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2021-05-17 14:11:11] [INFO ] Computed 0 place invariants in 2 ms
[2021-05-17 14:11:11] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Application raised an uncaught exception null
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator.toGal(MccTranslator.java:879)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator.toGal(MccTranslator.java:789)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator.toGal(MccTranslator.java:835)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator.toGal(MccTranslator.java:825)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator.lambda$3(MccTranslator.java:862)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.expr.NaryOp.forEachChild(NaryOp.java:153)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator.toGal(MccTranslator.java:862)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator.toGal(MccTranslator.java:760)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator.rebuildSpecification(MccTranslator.java:729)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.GlobalPropertySolver.verifyWithSDD(GlobalPropertySolver.java:585)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.LTLPropertySolver.runStutteringLTLTest(LTLPropertySolver.java:269)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.LTLPropertySolver.runStructuralLTLCheck(LTLPropertySolver.java:60)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:470)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:140)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:43)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:203)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:134)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:104)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:401)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:653)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:590)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1461)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1434)

BK_STOP 1621260672102

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ cut -d . -f 9
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202104292328.jar
+ VERSION=0
+ echo 'Running Version 0'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data /home/mcc/execution/workspace -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/.eclipse -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx16000m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Referendum-PT-0100"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Referendum-PT-0100, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r178-tajo-162089416000549"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Referendum-PT-0100.tgz
mv Referendum-PT-0100 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;