fond
Model Checking Contest 2021
11th edition, Paris, France, June 23, 2021
Execution of r056-oct2-162038334800270
Last Updated
Jun 28, 2021

About the Execution of 2020-gold for CloudReconfiguration-PT-309

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
4358.852 3600000.00 1028972.00 286.00 FFFFTFFFTFFTFFFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fko/mcc2021-input.r056-oct2-162038334800270.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fko/mcc2021-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool gold2020
Input is CloudReconfiguration-PT-309, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r056-oct2-162038334800270
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.1M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 5 16:58 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 133K May 10 09:42 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 5 16:58 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 101K May 10 09:42 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 6 14:48 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 6 14:48 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Mar 28 15:54 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Mar 28 15:54 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Mar 28 15:54 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Mar 28 15:54 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Mar 23 03:22 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Mar 23 03:22 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Mar 22 12:51 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Mar 22 12:51 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Mar 22 09:10 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Mar 22 09:10 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 5 16:51 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 5 16:51 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 5 16:51 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 660K May 5 16:51 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-00
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-01
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-02
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-03
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-04
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-05
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-06
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-07
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-08
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-09
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-10
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-11
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-12
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-13
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-14
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1620904647821

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
[2021-05-13 11:17:29] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -timeout, 3600, -rebuildPNML]
[2021-05-13 11:17:29] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2021-05-13 11:17:30] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 115 ms
[2021-05-13 11:17:30] [INFO ] Transformed 2585 places.
[2021-05-13 11:17:30] [INFO ] Transformed 3095 transitions.
[2021-05-13 11:17:30] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2021-05-13 11:17:30] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 2585 places and 3095 transitions in 160 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 94 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 719 resets, run finished after 337 ms. (steps per millisecond=296 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1]
// Phase 1: matrix 3095 rows 2585 cols
[2021-05-13 11:17:30] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 51 ms
[2021-05-13 11:17:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 64 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:17:31] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:17:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 14102 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:17:45] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 191 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:17:46] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:18:06] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:18:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19325 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2021-05-13 11:18:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:18:06] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe") while checking expression at index 0
[2021-05-13 11:18:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 62 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:18:07] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:18:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 16152 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:18:23] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 179 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:18:24] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:18:44] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:18:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19754 ms returned (error "Solver has unexpectedly terminated")
[2021-05-13 11:18:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:18:44] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed") while checking expression at index 1
[2021-05-13 11:18:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 85 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:18:45] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:18:58] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 12845 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:18:58] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 150 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:18:59] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:19:19] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:19:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19791 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2021-05-13 11:19:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:19:19] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed") while checking expression at index 2
[2021-05-13 11:19:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 51 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:19:20] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:19:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 14148 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:19:34] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 177 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:19:35] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:19:55] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:19:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19818 ms returned (error "Solver has unexpectedly terminated")
[2021-05-13 11:19:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:19:55] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe") while checking expression at index 3
[2021-05-13 11:19:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 90 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:19:56] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:20:15] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:20:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19324 ms returned unknown
[2021-05-13 11:20:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 47 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:20:16] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:20:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 16483 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:20:32] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 135 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:20:33] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:20:53] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:20:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19728 ms returned unknown
[2021-05-13 11:20:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 49 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:20:54] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:21:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 15975 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:21:10] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 150 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:21:11] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:21:31] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:21:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19666 ms returned unknown
[2021-05-13 11:21:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 49 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:21:31] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:21:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 13563 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:21:45] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 118 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:21:46] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:22:06] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:22:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19795 ms returned unknown
[2021-05-13 11:22:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 47 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:22:06] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:22:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 17753 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:22:24] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 280 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:22:26] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:22:46] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:22:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19457 ms returned unknown
[2021-05-13 11:22:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 49 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:22:46] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:22:58] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 12058 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:22:58] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 134 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:22:59] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:23:19] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:23:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19704 ms returned unknown
[2021-05-13 11:23:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 46 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:23:20] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:23:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 13954 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:23:34] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 122 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:23:35] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:23:55] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:23:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19720 ms returned unknown
[2021-05-13 11:23:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 81 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:23:56] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:24:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 15460 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:24:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 125 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:24:12] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:24:32] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:24:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19731 ms returned unknown
[2021-05-13 11:24:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 51 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:24:32] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:24:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 14268 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:24:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 129 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:24:48] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:25:08] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:25:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19760 ms returned unknown
[2021-05-13 11:25:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 64 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:25:08] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:25:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 12688 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:25:21] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 126 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:25:22] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:25:42] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:25:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19721 ms returned unknown
[2021-05-13 11:25:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 50 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:25:43] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:26:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19524 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:26:02] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:26:22] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:26:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19751 ms returned unknown
[2021-05-13 11:26:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 50 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:26:22] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:26:42] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:26:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19731 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2021-05-13 11:26:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 107 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:26:43] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:27:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19322 ms returned (error "Solver has unexpectedly terminated")
[2021-05-13 11:27:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 78 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:27:03] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:27:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 6657 ms returned unsat
[2021-05-13 11:27:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 99 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:27:10] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:27:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19314 ms returned (error "Solver has unexpectedly terminated")
[2021-05-13 11:27:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 59 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:27:30] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:27:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19392 ms returned (error "Solver has unexpectedly terminated")
[2021-05-13 11:27:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 106 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:27:50] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:28:10] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:28:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19351 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2021-05-13 11:28:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 94 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:28:10] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:28:30] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe (= s2069 (- t572 t573))") while checking expression at index 21
[2021-05-13 11:28:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 115 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:28:31] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:28:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 18477 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:28:49] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 191 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:28:50] [INFO ] Added : 15 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 673 ms. Result :(error "Failed to check-sat")
[2021-05-13 11:28:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 61 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:28:50] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-13 11:29:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 16029 ms returned sat
[2021-05-13 11:29:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3094/4086/3094 causal constraints in 277 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:29:08] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-13 11:29:28] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2021-05-13 11:29:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 19759 ms returned unknown
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 1 simplifications.
[2021-05-13 11:29:29] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 4 formulas.
[2021-05-13 11:29:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 287 ms
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2021-05-13 11:29:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2021-05-13 11:29:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 103 ms
[2021-05-13 11:29:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2021-05-13 11:29:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2021-05-13 11:29:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 123 redundant transitions.
[2021-05-13 11:29:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 204 ms
[2021-05-13 11:29:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 338 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:29:29] [INFO ] Export to MCC properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.sr.xml took 3 ms.
[2021-05-13 11:29:29] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml took 19 ms.
info: Time: 3600 - MCC
vrfy: Checking LTLFireability @ CloudReconfiguration-PT-309 @ 3570 seconds

FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-309-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT
vrfy: finished
info: timeLeft: 3418
rslt: Output for LTLFireability @ CloudReconfiguration-PT-309

{
"build":
{
"architecture": 64,
"assertions": false,
"build_hostname": "mcc2019",
"build_system": "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu",
"optimizations": true,
"package_version": "2.0",
"svn_version": "3189M"
},
"call":
{
"exec_host": "mcc2020",
"markinglimit": null,
"parameters":
[
"--pnmlnet",
"model.pnml",
"--xmlformula",
"--formula=LTLFireability.xml",
"--mcc",
"--donotcomputecapacities",
"--encoder=simplecompressed",
"--safe",
"--check=modelchecking",
"--stubborn=deletion",
"--stateequation=par",
"--timelimit=3570",
"--localtimelimit=0",
"--preference=force_ltl",
"--json=LTLFireability.json",
"--jsoninclude=formula,formulastat,net"
],
"starttime": "Thu May 13 11:29:30 2021
",
"timelimit": 3570
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 293
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 3,
"G": 3,
"U": 0,
"X": 2,
"aconj": 3,
"adisj": 2,
"aneg": 4,
"comp": 5,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 5,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 3,
"tdisj": 1,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X (G ((F ((G (((1 <= p1372))) AND ((p2270 <= 0)))) AND (F (((1 <= p2270))) OR X (F ((G (((1 <= p1372))) AND ((p2270 <= 0)))))))))",
"processed_size": 129,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 78,
"markings": 78,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 6
},
"compoundnumber": 0,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 320
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 320
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((1 <= p2376))",
"processed_size": 14,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 1,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 352
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p2337 <= 0))",
"processed_size": 14,
"rewrites": 72
},
"result":
{
"edges": 89,
"markings": 89,
"produced_by": "state space / EG",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 2,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 2
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"type": "eventual_occurrence"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 391
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "G (((1 <= p2416)))",
"processed_size": 18,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 89,
"markings": 89,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 2
},
"compoundnumber": 3,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl preserving/insertion"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 1,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 352
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 2,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 2,
"comp": 3,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 3,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 3,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X ((X (F (((p1268 <= 0)))) R ((p1543 <= 0) OR (p456 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 61,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 2,
"markings": 3,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 5
},
"compoundnumber": 2,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 391
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 5,
"aconj": 3,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 3,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 3,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 1,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 3,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X (X (X (X (G ((X (((1 <= p1761))) AND (((1 <= p1985)) OR ((1 <= p1080)))))))))",
"processed_size": 80,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 73,
"markings": 73,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 7
},
"compoundnumber": 3,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 440
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 3,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 2,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 1,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X (G ((X (X (F (((p2106 <= 0))))) AND ((p1689 <= 0)))))",
"processed_size": 55,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 7654270,
"markings": 2037679,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 5
},
"compoundnumber": 4,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 488
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 488
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((1 <= p11))",
"processed_size": 12,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 5,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 570
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X (F (((1 <= p388))))",
"processed_size": 21,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 73,
"markings": 73,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 2
},
"compoundnumber": 6,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 5,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 570
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 3,
"G": 0,
"U": 2,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 5,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 5,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 5,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 1,
"tdisj": 1,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 4,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X (((F (((1 <= p1434))) U (F (((1 <= p1216))) OR (F (((1 <= p1434))) AND ((1 <= p77))))) U ((1 <= p2060))))",
"processed_size": 107,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 73,
"markings": 73,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 6
},
"compoundnumber": 6,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 684
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "F (G (((p1557 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 22,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 77508,
"markings": 57754,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 2
},
"compoundnumber": 7,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl preserving/insertion"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "stabilization",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 855
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "F (G (((p523 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 21,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 8567,
"markings": 4105,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 2
},
"compoundnumber": 8,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl preserving/insertion"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "stabilization",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1140
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "F (G (((p1439 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 22,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 122523,
"markings": 93784,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 2
},
"compoundnumber": 9,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl preserving/insertion"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "stabilization",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1709
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "G (F ((((1 <= p572)) OR ((1 <= p1612)))))",
"processed_size": 42,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 88,
"markings": 88,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 2
},
"compoundnumber": 10,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl preserving/insertion"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "fairness",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 3418
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 2,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 5,
"adisj": 2,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 6,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 6,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 2,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 5,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "(((p505 <= 0)) U ((((1 <= p1233)) U ((1 <= p505))) OR (F ((((1 <= p2002)) OR ((1 <= p2280)))) OR ((1 <= p348)))))",
"processed_size": 114,
"rewrites": 70
},
"result":
{
"edges": 89,
"markings": 89,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 3
},
"compoundnumber": 11,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl preserving/insertion"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"error": null,
"memory": 101428,
"runtime": 152.000000,
"signal": null,
"timelimitreached": false
},
"files":
{
"formula": "LTLFireability.xml",
"net": "model.pnml"
},
"formula":
{
"skeleton": "F(G(*)) : X(G((F((G(*) AND *)) AND (F(**) OR X(F((G(*) AND *))))))) : (G(**) OR (** OR (X((** U **)) AND F(**)))) : X((X(F(*)) R *)) : X(X(X(X(G((X(**) AND **)))))) : (** U ((** U **) OR (F(**) OR **))) : X(G((X(X(F(*))) AND *))) : (X(F(**)) OR **) : F(G(*)) : X(((F(**) U (F(**) OR (F(**) AND **))) U **)) : F(G(**)) : G(F(**))"
},
"net":
{
"arcs": 6463,
"conflict_clusters": 2448,
"places": 2585,
"places_significant": 2581,
"singleton_clusters": 0,
"transitions": 3095
},
"result":
{
"preliminary_value": "no no no yes no no no no no no no no ",
"value": "no no no yes no no no no no no no no "
},
"task":
{
"type": "compound"
}
}
lola: LoLA will run for 3570 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: input: PNML file (--pnml)
lola: reading net from model.pnml
lola: reading pnml
lola: PNML file contains place/transition net
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml
lola: 5680/268435456 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: Size of bit vector: 2585
lola: finding significant places
lola: 2585 places, 3095 transitions, 2581 significant places
lola: compute conflict clusters
lola: computed conflict clusters
lola: Computing conflicting sets
lola: Computing back conflicting sets
lola: TASK
lola: Reading formula in XML format (--xmlformula)
lola: reading pnml
lola: reading formula from LTLFireability.xml
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p746 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2183 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p523 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2270 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1372 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1372 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2270 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2416 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2376 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2337 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2416 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2337 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1268 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1543 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p456 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1761 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1985 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1080 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p505 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1233 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p505 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2002 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2280 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p348 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2106 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1689 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p388 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p11 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p572 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1318 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1557 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1557 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1557 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1434 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1216 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1434 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p77 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2060 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p431 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p431 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1439 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p572 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1612 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p572 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1612 <= 1)
lola: G (F (NOT(F (X ((X (((1 <= p2183) AND ((p746 <= 0)))) U X (((1 <= p523))))))))) : G (X ((F (((1 <= p2270))) U NOT(X (G (((((1 <= p1372)) U ((p1372 <= 0))) OR ((1 <= p2270))))))))) : ((G (((1 <= p2416))) OR ((1 <= p2376))) OR ((X (((1 <= p2337))) U X (((1 <= p2416)))) AND F (((1 <= p2337))))) : X (NOT((X (G (((1 <= p1268)))) U ((1 <= p1543) AND (1 <= p456))))) : X (X (X (G (X ((X (((1 <= p1761))) AND (((1 <= p1985)) OR ((1 <= p1080))))))))) : (((p505 <= 0)) U (((((1 <= p1233)) U ((1 <= p505))) OR F ((((1 <= p2002)) OR ((1 <= p2280))))) OR ((1 <= p348)))) : X (NOT(F ((X (X (G (((1 <= p2106))))) OR ((1 <= p1689)))))) : (F (X (((1 <= p388)))) OR ((1 <= p11))) : (NOT((((1 <= p572) AND (1 <= p1318)) U X (((1 <= p1557))))) U F (NOT(F ((X (((p1557 <= 0))) U X (((1 <= p1557)))))))) : X (((F (((1 <= p1434))) U (F (((1 <= p1216))) OR (F (((1 <= p1434))) AND ((1 <= p77))))) U ((1 <= p2060)))) : X (((NOT(X (G (((1 <= p431))))) OR ((1 <= p431))) U F (G (X (((p1439 <= 0))))))) : G (F (((((1 <= p572)) U ((1 <= p1612))) U X ((((1 <= p572)) OR ((1 <= p1612)))))))
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:410
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:434
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:380
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:380
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:374
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:419
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:318
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:353
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:437
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:347
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:353
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:377
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:522
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:410
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:254
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:338
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:353
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:254
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:318
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:338
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:410
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:419
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:347
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:380
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:422
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:353
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:380
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:422
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:380
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:434
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:353
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:377
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 293 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X (G ((F ((G (((1 <= p1372))) AND ((p2270 <= 0)))) AND (F (((1 <= p2270))) OR X (F ((G (((1 <= p1372))) AND ((p2270 <= 0)))))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X (G ((F ((G (((1 <= p1372))) AND ((p2270 <= 0)))) AND (F (((1 <= p2270))) OR X (F ((G (((1 <= p1372))) AND ((p2270 <= 0)))))))))
lola: processed formula length: 129
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 6 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 78 markings, 78 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 320 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (G (((1 <= p2416))) OR (((1 <= p2376)) OR (X ((((1 <= p2337)) U ((1 <= p2416)))) AND F (((1 <= p2337))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 320 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((1 <= p2376))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: ((1 <= p2376))
lola: processed formula length: 14
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: processed formula with 1 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net violates the given property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 352 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: F (((1 <= p2337)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking eventual occurrence
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:750
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: processed formula: ((p2337 <= 0))
lola: processed formula length: 14
lola: 72 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space / EG)
lola: state space: using search routine for EG formula (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using EG preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space / EG
lola: The predicate does not eventually occur.
lola: 89 markings, 89 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 391 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: G (((1 <= p2416)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: G (((1 <= p2416)))
lola: processed formula length: 18
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 2 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with deletion algorithm (--stubborn=deletion)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm(--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 89 markings, 89 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The Boolean predicate is false.
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 352 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X ((X (F (((p1268 <= 0)))) R ((p1543 <= 0) OR (p456 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X ((X (F (((p1268 <= 0)))) R ((p1543 <= 0) OR (p456 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 61
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 5 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: ========================================
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula (language of the product automaton is empty).
lola: 3 markings, 2 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 391 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X (X (X (X (G ((X (((1 <= p1761))) AND (((1 <= p1985)) OR ((1 <= p1080)))))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X (X (X (X (G ((X (((1 <= p1761))) AND (((1 <= p1985)) OR ((1 <= p1080)))))))))
lola: processed formula length: 80
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 7 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 73 markings, 73 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 440 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X (G ((X (X (F (((p2106 <= 0))))) AND ((p1689 <= 0)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X (G ((X (X (F (((p2106 <= 0))))) AND ((p1689 <= 0)))))
lola: processed formula length: 55
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 5 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: 125007 markings, 384012 edges, 25001 markings/sec, 0 secs
lola: 231810 markings, 764053 edges, 21361 markings/sec, 5 secs
lola: 356517 markings, 1135528 edges, 24941 markings/sec, 10 secs
lola: 468441 markings, 1513824 edges, 22385 markings/sec, 15 secs
lola: 581328 markings, 1888458 edges, 22577 markings/sec, 20 secs
lola: 708672 markings, 2262181 edges, 25469 markings/sec, 25 secs
lola: 821006 markings, 2638219 edges, 22467 markings/sec, 30 secs
lola: 932435 markings, 3018415 edges, 22286 markings/sec, 35 secs
lola: 1036950 markings, 3394030 edges, 20903 markings/sec, 40 secs
lola: 1129013 markings, 3777124 edges, 18413 markings/sec, 45 secs
lola: 1211513 markings, 4155865 edges, 16500 markings/sec, 50 secs
lola: 1304896 markings, 4529343 edges, 18677 markings/sec, 55 secs
lola: 1393758 markings, 4900153 edges, 17772 markings/sec, 60 secs
lola: 1481185 markings, 5282278 edges, 17485 markings/sec, 65 secs
lola: 1569507 markings, 5657056 edges, 17664 markings/sec, 70 secs
lola: 1655715 markings, 6029779 edges, 17242 markings/sec, 75 secs
lola: 1755983 markings, 6411482 edges, 20054 markings/sec, 80 secs
lola: 1838428 markings, 6780505 edges, 16489 markings/sec, 85 secs
lola: 1926268 markings, 7163191 edges, 17568 markings/sec, 90 secs
lola: 2005884 markings, 7535369 edges, 15923 markings/sec, 95 secs
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 2037679 markings, 7654270 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 488 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (X (F (((1 <= p388)))) OR ((1 <= p11)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 488 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((1 <= p11))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: ((1 <= p11))
lola: processed formula length: 12
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: processed formula with 1 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net violates the given property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 570 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X (F (((1 <= p388))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X (F (((1 <= p388))))
lola: processed formula length: 21
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 2 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 73 markings, 73 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The Boolean predicate is false.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 570 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X (((F (((1 <= p1434))) U (F (((1 <= p1216))) OR (F (((1 <= p1434))) AND ((1 <= p77))))) U ((1 <= p2060))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X (((F (((1 <= p1434))) U (F (((1 <= p1216))) OR (F (((1 <= p1434))) AND ((1 <= p77))))) U ((1 <= p2060))))
lola: processed formula length: 107
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 6 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 73 markings, 73 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 684 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: F (G (((p1557 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking stabilization
lola: stabilization not yet implemented, converting to LTL...
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: F (G (((p1557 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 22
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 2 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with deletion algorithm (--stubborn=deletion)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm(--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: add low 1006
lola: add low 928
lola: add low 929
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 57754 markings, 77508 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 855 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: F (G (((p523 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking stabilization
lola: stabilization not yet implemented, converting to LTL...
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: F (G (((p523 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 21
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 2 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with deletion algorithm (--stubborn=deletion)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm(--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: add low 655
lola: add low 656
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 4105 markings, 8567 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 1140 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: F (G (((p1439 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking stabilization
lola: stabilization not yet implemented, converting to LTL...
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: F (G (((p1439 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 22
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 2 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with deletion algorithm (--stubborn=deletion)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm(--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: add low 1213
lola: add low 1214
lola: add low 1311
lola: add low 1312
lola: add low 1094
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 93784 markings, 122523 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 1709 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: G (F ((((1 <= p572)) OR ((1 <= p1612)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking fairness
lola: fairness not yet implemented, converting to LTL...
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: G (F ((((1 <= p572)) OR ((1 <= p1612)))))
lola: processed formula length: 42
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 2 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with deletion algorithm (--stubborn=deletion)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm(--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 88 markings, 88 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 3418 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (((p505 <= 0)) U ((((1 <= p1233)) U ((1 <= p505))) OR (F ((((1 <= p2002)) OR ((1 <= p2280)))) OR ((1 <= p348)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: (((p505 <= 0)) U ((((1 <= p1233)) U ((1 <= p505))) OR (F ((((1 <= p2002)) OR ((1 <= p2280)))) OR ((1 <= p348)))))
lola: processed formula length: 114
lola: 70 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 3 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with deletion algorithm (--stubborn=deletion)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm(--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 89 markings, 89 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: no no no yes no no no no no no no no
lola:
preliminary result: no no no yes no no no no no no no no
lola: memory consumption: 101428 KB
lola: time consumption: 152 seconds
lola: print data as JSON (--json)
lola: writing JSON to LTLFireability.json
lola: closed JSON file LTLFireability.json
rslt: finished

--------------------
content from stderr:

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="CloudReconfiguration-PT-309"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="gold2020"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool gold2020"
echo " Input is CloudReconfiguration-PT-309, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r056-oct2-162038334800270"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/CloudReconfiguration-PT-309.tgz
mv CloudReconfiguration-PT-309 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;