About the Execution of ITS-Tools for EGFr-PT-02010
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 650.632 | 14787.00 | 28363.00 | 262.90 | TFFFTTFTFFFFTFFT | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2021-input.r083-tall-162048875500533.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/data/fkordon/mcc2021-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is EGFr-PT-02010, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r083-tall-162048875500533
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 500K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 5 16:58 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K May 5 16:58 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K May 5 16:58 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 124K May 5 16:58 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 6 14:48 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 6 14:48 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Mar 28 16:06 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Mar 28 16:06 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K Mar 28 16:06 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Mar 28 16:06 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K Mar 23 10:26 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Mar 23 10:26 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K Mar 22 18:29 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Mar 22 18:29 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Mar 22 09:11 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Mar 22 09:11 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 5 16:51 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 5 16:51 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 5 16:51 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 5 16:51 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-00
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-01
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-02
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-03
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-04
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-05
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-06
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-07
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-08
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-09
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-10
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-11
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-12
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-13
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-14
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1620626204035
Running Version 0
[2021-05-10 05:56:45] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2021-05-10 05:56:45] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 39 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Transformed 40 places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Transformed 68 transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 40 places and 68 transitions in 78 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Initial state test concluded for 5 properties.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 29 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 5 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 200 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for LTL removed 3 formulas.
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 4473 resets, run finished after 446 ms. (steps per millisecond=224 ) properties (out of 21) seen :10
Running SMT prover for 11 properties.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 13 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 4 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 11 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 38 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 4 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Added : 27 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 56 ms. Result :sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 14 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 4 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 1 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 6 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Added : 28 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 43 ms. Result :sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned unsat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 12 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 8 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 11 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 10 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 10 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 7 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 7 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 22 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Added : 28 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 28 ms. Result :sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 13 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 10 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 7 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 5 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 23 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 4 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Added : 28 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 28 ms. Result :sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 8 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Added : 27 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 26 ms. Result :sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 13 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 1 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 8 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 6 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 10 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Added : 27 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 26 ms. Result :sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 10 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:47] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Added : 27 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 27 ms. Result :sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 1 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 6 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 6 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 19 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Added : 28 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 24 ms. Result :sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 6 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 10 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 9 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 6 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 23 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Added : 28 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 27 ms. Result :sat
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Initial state test concluded for 1 properties.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X(F((G((p1&&X(p1)))||p0))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 7 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 5 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:48] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 146 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : EGFr-PT-02010-00 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}]], initial=1, aps=[p1:(OR (NEQ s0 1) (NEQ s2 1) (NEQ s4 1) (NEQ s32 1) (NEQ s36 1)), p0:(OR (NEQ s10 1) (NEQ s33 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic], stateDesc=[null, null][false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 241 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 218 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 134 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 213 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 7 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:49] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 470 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 339 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL7835883796549258612.gal : 80 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL3590577093172155062.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, -i, /tmp/LTL7835883796549258612.gal, -t, CGAL, -LTL, /tmp/LTL3590577093172155062.ltl, -c, -stutter-deadlock, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/LTL7835883796549258612.gal -t CGAL -LTL /tmp/LTL3590577093172155062.ltl -c -stutter-deadlock --gen-order FOLLOW
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(F(("((CyclinE1_equals_0==0)||(MYC_equals_1==0))")||(G(("(((((AKT1_0==0)||(CDK2_equals_0==0))||(CDK4_equals_0==0))||(MYC_equals_0==0))||(p27_equals_0==0))")&&(X("(((((AKT1_0==0)||(CDK2_equals_0==0))||(CDK4_equals_0==0))||(MYC_equals_0==0))||(p27_equals_0==0))"))))))))
Formula 0 simplified : !XF("((CyclinE1_equals_0==0)||(MYC_equals_1==0))" | G("(((((AKT1_0==0)||(CDK2_equals_0==0))||(CDK4_equals_0==0))||(MYC_equals_0==0))||(p27_equals_0==0))" & X"(((((AKT1_0==0)||(CDK2_equals_0==0))||(CDK4_equals_0==0))||(MYC_equals_0==0))||(p27_equals_0==0))"))
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t10, t14, t16, t17, t21, t23, t24, t32, t34, t37, t39, t40, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t57, t59, t61, t64, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :30/8/30/68
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1 deadlock states
2 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
1 transitions explored
2 items max in DFS search stack
4 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.052718,18236,1,0,119,10395,135,43,1446,7769,120
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Treatment of property EGFr-PT-02010-00 finished in 2549 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(G(F((p0||G(p1)))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 4 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 2 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:50] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 47 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : EGFr-PT-02010-01 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (EQ s11 1) (EQ s32 1)), p0:(AND (EQ s5 1) (EQ s8 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 21 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property EGFr-PT-02010-01 finished in 231 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(G(F(p0)))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 2 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 2 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 44 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EGFr-PT-02010-03 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s0 1) (EQ s23 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 21 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property EGFr-PT-02010-03 finished in 178 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(G(p0))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 4 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 15 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 27 ms :[true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EGFr-PT-02010-05 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(OR (NEQ s0 1) (NEQ s26 1) (NEQ s30 1) (NEQ s33 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4485 reset in 166 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4485 reset in 196 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 26 ms :[true, (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4472 reset in 151 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4481 reset in 163 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL13134222002297182071.gal : 2 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL8041432156644590512.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, -i, /tmp/LTL13134222002297182071.gal, -t, CGAL, -LTL, /tmp/LTL8041432156644590512.ltl, -c, -stutter-deadlock, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/LTL13134222002297182071.gal -t CGAL -LTL /tmp/LTL8041432156644590512.ltl -c -stutter-deadlock --gen-order FOLLOW
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G("((((AKT1_0==0)||(ERalpha_equals_0==0))||(MEK1_equals_0==0))||(MYC_equals_1==0))")))
Formula 0 simplified : !G"((((AKT1_0==0)||(ERalpha_equals_0==0))||(MEK1_equals_0==0))||(MYC_equals_1==0))"
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t10, t14, t16, t17, t21, t23, t24, t32, t34, t37, t39, t40, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t57, t59, t61, t64, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :30/8/30/68
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1 deadlock states
24 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
24 transitions explored
24 items max in DFS search stack
9 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.109757,20372,1,0,174,21315,129,145,1432,25218,394
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Treatment of property EGFr-PT-02010-05 finished in 1057 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(F(p0))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 2 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EGFr-PT-02010-06 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s19 1) (EQ s30 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 21 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property EGFr-PT-02010-06 finished in 276 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(G(F(p0)))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 2 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 44 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EGFr-PT-02010-07 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (NEQ s1 1) (NEQ s37 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5928 reset in 136 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5900 reset in 200 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 59 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5955 reset in 149 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5932 reset in 142 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL5957728277054486004.gal : 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL8462759522805286983.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, -i, /tmp/LTL5957728277054486004.gal, -t, CGAL, -LTL, /tmp/LTL8462759522805286983.ltl, -c, -stutter-deadlock, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/LTL5957728277054486004.gal -t CGAL -LTL /tmp/LTL8462759522805286983.ltl -c -stutter-deadlock --gen-order FOLLOW
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F("((AKT1_equals_1==0)||(p27_equals_1==0))"))))
Formula 0 simplified : !GF"((AKT1_equals_1==0)||(p27_equals_1==0))"
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t10, t14, t16, t17, t21, t23, t24, t32, t34, t37, t39, t40, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t57, t59, t61, t64, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :30/8/30/68
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1 deadlock states
39 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
44 transitions explored
24 items max in DFS search stack
8 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.098565,20236,1,0,202,17623,136,133,1473,19012,490
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Treatment of property EGFr-PT-02010-07 finished in 1107 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(F((p0||G(F(p0)))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 2 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 8 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 23 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EGFr-PT-02010-09 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s6 1) (EQ s39 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 21 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property EGFr-PT-02010-09 finished in 161 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(F((p0||G(p1))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 4 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:53] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 25 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : EGFr-PT-02010-10 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (EQ s4 1) (EQ s39 1)), p0:(AND (EQ s4 1) (EQ s39 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s17 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 21 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property EGFr-PT-02010-10 finished in 170 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X(F((X(X(p1))||p0))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 3 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : EGFr-PT-02010-12 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (NEQ s13 1) (NEQ s24 1)), p1:(OR (EQ s19 0) (EQ s24 0))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 38373 reset in 113 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 38496 reset in 114 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [p0, p1]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 113 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 38469 reset in 103 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 38503 reset in 113 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 3 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:54] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 38483 reset in 143 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 38440 reset in 153 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL2723416934362922475.gal : 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2251774723000699211.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, -i, /tmp/LTL2723416934362922475.gal, -t, CGAL, -LTL, /tmp/LTL2251774723000699211.ltl, -c, -stutter-deadlock, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/LTL2723416934362922475.gal -t CGAL -LTL /tmp/LTL2251774723000699211.ltl -c -stutter-deadlock --gen-order FOLLOW
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(F(("((EGF_equals_1==0)||(ERBB3_equals_0==0))")||(X(X("((ERBB1_3_equals_1==0)||(ERBB3_equals_0==0))")))))))
Formula 0 simplified : !XF("((EGF_equals_1==0)||(ERBB3_equals_0==0))" | XX"((ERBB1_3_equals_1==0)||(ERBB3_equals_0==0))")
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t10, t14, t16, t17, t21, t23, t24, t32, t34, t37, t39, t40, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t57, t59, t61, t64, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :30/8/30/68
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1 deadlock states
4 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
4 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.046787,17984,1,0,123,10581,137,45,1431,7885,129
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Treatment of property EGFr-PT-02010-12 finished in 1375 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X((X(X(G(p1)))&&p0)))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 2 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 104 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : EGFr-PT-02010-13 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 1}]], initial=4, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s3 1) (EQ s10 1)), p1:(OR (NEQ s3 1) (NEQ s10 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property EGFr-PT-02010-13 finished in 244 ms.
Running Spot : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba, --hoaf=tv, -f, !(X(G((G(p0) U (p1||(!p0 U (p2||G(!p0))))))))], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Support contains 5 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 196 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) p0), (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true]
Running random walk in product with property : EGFr-PT-02010-15 automaton TGBA [mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(EQ s12 0), p2:(AND (OR (NEQ s23 1) (NEQ s30 1)) (OR (NEQ s1 1) (NEQ s35 1))), p0:(AND (EQ s23 1) (EQ s30 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4485 reset in 145 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4482 reset in 156 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), p2, (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 159 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) p0), (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4490 reset in 136 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4480 reset in 154 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true, true, true, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 134 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) p0), (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true]
Support contains 5 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2021-05-10 05:56:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2021-05-10 05:56:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2021-05-10 05:56:57] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 0 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 40/40 places, 68/68 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4486 reset in 239 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4484 reset in 214 ms.
[2021-05-10 05:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14116074470638898968.gal : 1 ms
[2021-05-10 05:56:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL17509073144482717477.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, -i, /tmp/LTL14116074470638898968.gal, -t, CGAL, -LTL, /tmp/LTL17509073144482717477.ltl, -c, -stutter-deadlock, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202104292328/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/LTL14116074470638898968.gal -t CGAL -LTL /tmp/LTL17509073144482717477.ltl -c -stutter-deadlock --gen-order FOLLOW
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(G((G("((ERBB2_3_equals_1==1)&&(MEK1_equals_0==1))"))U(("(EGF_equals_0==0)")||(("((ERBB2_3_equals_1==0)||(MEK1_equals_0==0))")U(("(((ERBB2_3_equals_1==0)||(MEK1_equals_0==0))&&((AKT1_equals_1==0)||(p21_equals_1==0)))")||(G("((ERBB2_3_equals_1==0)||(MEK1_equals_0==0))")))))))))
Formula 0 simplified : !XG(G"((ERBB2_3_equals_1==1)&&(MEK1_equals_0==1))" U ("(EGF_equals_0==0)" | ("((ERBB2_3_equals_1==0)||(MEK1_equals_0==0))" U ("(((ERBB2_3_equals_1==0)||(MEK1_equals_0==0))&&((AKT1_equals_1==0)||(p21_equals_1==0)))" | G"((ERBB2_3_equals_1==0)||(MEK1_equals_0==0))"))))
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t10, t14, t16, t17, t21, t23, t24, t32, t34, t37, t39, t40, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t57, t59, t61, t64, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :30/8/30/68
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1 deadlock states
24 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
24 transitions explored
24 items max in DFS search stack
12 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.132036,22944,1,0,173,23683,163,141,1473,27819,522
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Treatment of property EGFr-PT-02010-15 finished in 2036 ms.
All properties solved without resorting to model-checking.
BK_STOP 1620626218822
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ cut -d . -f 9
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202104292328.jar
+ VERSION=0
+ echo 'Running Version 0'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data /home/mcc/execution/workspace -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/.eclipse -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx16000m
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="EGFr-PT-02010"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is EGFr-PT-02010, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r083-tall-162048875500533"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/EGFr-PT-02010.tgz
mv EGFr-PT-02010 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;