fond
Model Checking Contest 2020
10th edition, Paris, France, June 23, 2020
Execution of r211-tajo-159033477700580
Last Updated
Jun 28, 2020

About the Execution of ITS-LoLa for ShieldPPPt-PT-001B

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
15743.300 3600000.00 886128.00 231.10 TTTFFFTFTFTTFTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.r211-tajo-159033477700580.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itslola
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-001B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r211-tajo-159033477700580
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 184K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 14 01:49 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 14 01:49 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 13 19:13 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 13 19:13 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 14 10:03 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 14 10:03 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K May 14 10:03 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 14 10:03 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 May 12 20:42 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 13 14:05 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 13 14:05 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K May 13 08:48 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 13 08:48 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 13 16:53 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 13 16:53 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 12 20:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 12 20:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1591316332963

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
[2020-06-05 00:18:54] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -timeout, 3600, -rebuildPNML]
[2020-06-05 00:18:54] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2020-06-05 00:18:54] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 29 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:54] [INFO ] Transformed 81 places.
[2020-06-05 00:18:54] [INFO ] Transformed 74 transitions.
[2020-06-05 00:18:54] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2020-06-05 00:18:54] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 81 places and 74 transitions in 61 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 110 ms. (steps per millisecond=909 ) properties seen :[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 81 cols
[2020-06-05 00:18:54] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 4 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2020-06-05 00:18:54] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-05 00:18:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 42 ms returned sat
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 18 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 17 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 199 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 20 ms returned sat
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 25 ms returned sat
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 16 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 15 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 8 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 79 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 73/109/73 causal constraints in 5 ms.
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Added : 69 causal constraints over 14 iterations in 92 ms. Result :unsat
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 27 ms returned sat
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 26 ms returned sat
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 17 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 17 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 71 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 73/109/73 causal constraints in 3 ms.
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Added : 72 causal constraints over 15 iterations in 70 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned unsat
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 2 simplifications.
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Export to MCC properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 3 ms.
[2020-06-05 00:18:55] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml took 2 ms.
info: Time: 3600 - MCC
vrfy: Checking CTLFireability @ ShieldPPPt-PT-001B @ 3570 seconds

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT
vrfy: finished
info: timeLeft: 2838
rslt: Output for CTLFireability @ ShieldPPPt-PT-001B

{
"build":
{
"architecture": 64,
"assertions": false,
"build_hostname": "mcc2019",
"build_system": "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu",
"optimizations": true,
"package_version": "2.0",
"svn_version": "3189M"
},
"call":
{
"exec_host": "mcc2020",
"markinglimit": null,
"parameters":
[
"--pnmlnet",
"model.pnml",
"--xmlformula",
"--formula=CTLFireability.xml",
"--mcc",
"--donotcomputecapacities",
"--encoder=simplecompressed",
"--check=modelchecking",
"--stubborn=tarjan",
"--stateequation=par",
"--quickchecks",
"--timelimit=3570",
"--localtimelimit=0",
"--preference=force_ctl",
"--json=CTLFireability.json",
"--jsoninclude=formula,formulastat,net"
],
"starttime": "Fri Jun 5 00:18:56 2020
",
"timelimit": 3570
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 222
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 222
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 1,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "AX(EG(((p25 <= 0) OR (p45 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 35,
"rewrites": 35
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 67,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 41,
"markings": 41,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 0,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 237
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p34 <= 0) OR (p67 <= 0))",
"processed_size": 27,
"rewrites": 33
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 1,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 254
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 5,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 6,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 6,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 6,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p73 <= 0) OR (((p64 <= 0)) AND ((p57 <= 0))) OR (((p53 <= 0)) AND ((p29 <= 0) OR (p11 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 99,
"rewrites": 33
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 2,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 0,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 237
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 237
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "EG(AF(((p8 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 19,
"rewrites": 35
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 67,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 236,
"markings": 136,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 1,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 254
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "AX(EF(((1 <= p78))))",
"processed_size": 20,
"rewrites": 35
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 67,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 27,
"markings": 28,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 2,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 274
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((1 <= p9))",
"processed_size": 11,
"rewrites": 33
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 3,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 297
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "AX(((1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p21)))",
"processed_size": 31,
"rewrites": 34
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 67,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 4,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 1,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 254
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 2,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 2,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "EX(EF(AX(((1 <= p17)))))",
"processed_size": 24,
"rewrites": 36
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 67,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 225188,
"markings": 99927,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 2,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 274
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "A (G (((p52 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 20,
"rewrites": 35
},
"result":
{
"edges": 25,
"markings": 26,
"produced_by": "state space",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 3,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion"
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 1,
"problems": 1
},
"type": "invariance",
"workflow": "stateequation||search"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 297
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 3,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 4,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 4,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 4,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "E (F (((1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p21) AND (((1 <= p72)) OR ((1 <= p61))))))",
"processed_size": 71,
"rewrites": 34
},
"result":
{
"edges": 42,
"markings": 43,
"produced_by": "state space",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 4,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion"
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 6,
"problems": 2
},
"type": "reachability",
"workflow": "stateequation||search"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 324
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p69 <= 0))",
"processed_size": 12,
"rewrites": 37
},
"result":
{
"edges": 108420426,
"markings": 17903046,
"produced_by": "parallel",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 5,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "tscc preserving/always up"
}
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 1,
"problems": 1
},
"store":
{
"type": "dfs/tscc"
},
"type": "possible_invariance",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 341
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((1 <= p36))",
"processed_size": 12,
"rewrites": 36
},
"result":
{
"edges": 94,
"markings": 93,
"produced_by": "state space /EFEG",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 6,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 1
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 1,
"problems": 1
},
"type": "reachability_of_possible_preservation",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 379
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((1 <= p54))",
"processed_size": 12,
"rewrites": 36
},
"result":
{
"edges": 268,
"markings": 249,
"produced_by": "state space /EFEG",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 7,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 1
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 1,
"problems": 1
},
"type": "reachability_of_possible_preservation",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 427
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((1 <= p42))",
"processed_size": 12,
"rewrites": 36
},
"result":
{
"edges": 146,
"markings": 146,
"produced_by": "state space /EFEG",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 8,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 2
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 1,
"problems": 1
},
"type": "reachability_of_possible_preservation",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 488
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p42 <= 0))",
"processed_size": 12,
"rewrites": 36
},
"result":
{
"edges": 125,
"markings": 124,
"produced_by": "state space / EG",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 9,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 3
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 1,
"problems": 1
},
"type": "eventual_occurrence",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 569
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 5,
"adisj": 2,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 4,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 4,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 4,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((((p56 <= 0)) AND ((p8 <= 0))) OR (((p76 <= 0)) AND ((p64 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 68,
"rewrites": 37
},
"result":
{
"edges": 108189753,
"markings": 17903046,
"produced_by": "parallel",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 10,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "tscc preserving/always up"
}
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 8,
"problems": 4
},
"store":
{
"type": "dfs/tscc"
},
"type": "possible_invariance",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 655
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 2,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 2,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 1,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "AG((EG(((1 <= p0))) OR AF(((p71 <= 0)))))",
"processed_size": 41,
"rewrites": 36
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 67,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 155655956,
"markings": 17903046,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 11,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 766
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 3,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 2,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 5,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 6,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 6,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 1,
"tdisj": 1,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 6,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "AF((AG(((1 <= p71))) AND (AG(((1 <= p53))) OR ((1 <= p43) AND (1 <= p77) AND (((1 <= p37)) OR ((1 <= p30)))))))",
"processed_size": 112,
"rewrites": 36
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 67,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 84,
"markings": 42,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 12,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1022
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 2,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "A ((((1 <= p72)) R ((p49 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 33,
"rewrites": 38
},
"result":
{
"edges": 36,
"markings": 37,
"produced_by": "state space /EU",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 13,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "eu preserving",
"visible": 1
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 1,
"problems": 1
},
"type": "universal_release",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1533
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1533
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p41 <= 0))",
"processed_size": 12,
"rewrites": 33
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 14,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 3067
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 2,
"E": 1,
"F": 3,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 1,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "EF((AF(((1 <= p38))) AND AF(((1 <= p5)))))",
"processed_size": 42,
"rewrites": 36
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 67,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 146619767,
"markings": 17903046,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 15,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 14,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 2839
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 2839
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 1,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 2,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "E ((((p11 <= 0)) R ((p42 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 33,
"rewrites": 36
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "state space /ER",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 15,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl",
"visible": 2
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 1,
"problems": 1
},
"type": "existential_release",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 2,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 1,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "G ((((p16 <= 0)) OR F (((p23 <= 0)))))",
"processed_size": 38,
"rewrites": 43
},
"result":
{
"edges": 5808,
"markings": 5082,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 2
},
"compoundnumber": 17,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl preserving/insertion"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "existential single path",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": null
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 15,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"child":
[

{
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 1,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 2,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "E ((((p11 <= 0)) R ((p42 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 33,
"rewrites": 36
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "state space /ER",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 16,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl",
"visible": 2
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 1,
"problems": 1
},
"type": "existential_release",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "(((1 <= p70)) OR ((1 <= p76)))",
"processed_size": 31,
"rewrites": 36
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 1,
"produced_by": "state space / EG",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 17,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 5
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 2,
"problems": 2
},
"type": "eventual_occurrence",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 2,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 1,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "G ((((p16 <= 0)) OR F (((p23 <= 0)))))",
"processed_size": 38,
"rewrites": 43
},
"result":
{
"edges": 5808,
"markings": 5082,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 2
},
"compoundnumber": 18,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl preserving/insertion"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "existential single path",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
}
],
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 16,
"type": "boolean"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"error": null,
"memory": 35964,
"runtime": 732.000000,
"signal": null,
"timelimitreached": false
},
"files":
{
"formula": "CTLFireability.xml",
"net": "model.pnml"
},
"formula":
{
"skeleton": "E(F(E(G(**)))) : E(F(E(G(**)))) : (A(X(E(G(*)))) AND (** OR (E(G(**)) AND (A(F(**)) AND **)))) : A(G(*)) : A(F(**)) : E(F(A(G(**)))) : A(G((E(G(**)) OR A(F(*))))) : A(F((A(G(**)) AND (A(G(**)) OR **)))) : E(F(E(G(**)))) : E(F(A(G(**)))) : (A(F(*)) AND (E((* R *)) AND E(F((** AND E(G(**))))))) : E(F(**)) : (E(G(A(F(*)))) AND (A(X(E(F(**)))) AND (A(X(**)) OR **))) : E(X(E(F(A(X(**)))))) : A((* R *)) : (E(F((A(F(**)) AND A(F(**))))) AND **)"
},
"net":
{
"arcs": 184,
"conflict_clusters": 67,
"places": 81,
"places_significant": 69,
"singleton_clusters": 0,
"transitions": 74
},
"result":
{
"preliminary_value": "yes yes yes no no no yes no yes no yes yes no yes no no ",
"value": "yes yes yes no no no yes no yes no yes yes no yes no no "
},
"task":
{
"type": "compound"
}
}
lola: LoLA will run for 3570 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: input: PNML file (--pnml)
lola: reading net from model.pnml
lola: reading pnml
lola: PNML file contains place/transition net
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml
lola: 155/268435456 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: Size of bit vector: 2592
lola: finding significant places
lola: 81 places, 74 transitions, 69 significant places
lola: compute conflict clusters
lola: computed conflict clusters
lola: Computing conflicting sets
lola: Computing back conflicting sets
lola: TASK
lola: Reading formula in XML format (--xmlformula)
lola: reading pnml
lola: reading formula from CTLFireability.xml
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p54 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p42 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p25 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p45 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p73 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p64 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p57 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p53 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p29 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p11 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p40 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p61 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p13 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p34 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p67 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p52 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p42 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p69 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p0 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p71 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p71 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p53 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p43 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p77 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p37 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p30 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p36 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p56 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p8 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p76 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p64 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p70 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p76 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p11 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p42 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p16 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p23 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p19 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p21 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p72 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p61 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p8 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p78 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p19 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p21 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p9 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p17 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p72 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p49 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p38 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p5 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p41 <= 1)
lola: E (F (E (G (((1 <= p54)))))) : E (F (E (G (E (G (((1 <= p42)))))))) : (A (X (NOT(A (F (((1 <= p25) AND (1 <= p45))))))) AND (((p73 <= 0) OR (((p64 <= 0)) AND ((p57 <= 0))) OR (((p53 <= 0)) AND ((p29 <= 0) OR (p11 <= 0)))) OR ((E (G (((1 <= p40)))) AND A (F (((1 <= p61) AND (1 <= p13))))) AND ((p34 <= 0) OR (p67 <= 0))))) : NOT(E (((1 <= 0) U E (F (((1 <= p52))))))) : A (F (((1 <= p42)))) : E (F (E (G (A (G (((1 <= p69)))))))) : A (G ((E (G (((1 <= p0)))) OR NOT(E (G (((1 <= p71)))))))) : A (F ((A (G (((1 <= p71)))) AND (A (G (((1 <= p53)))) OR ((1 <= p43) AND (1 <= p77) AND (((1 <= p37)) OR ((1 <= p30)))))))) : E (F (E (F (E (G (((1 <= p36)))))))) : E (F (A (G (((((1 <= p56)) OR ((1 <= p8))) AND (((1 <= p76)) OR ((1 <= p64)))))))) : ((NOT(E (G ((((1 <= p70)) OR ((1 <= p76)))))) AND NOT(A ((((1 <= p11)) U ((1 <= p42)))))) AND E (F ((((1 <= p16)) AND E (G (((1 <= p23)))))))) : A (F (E (F (((1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p21) AND (((1 <= p72)) OR ((1 <= p61)))))))) : ((E (G (NOT(E (G (((1 <= p8))))))) AND A (X (E (F (((1 <= p78))))))) AND (A (X (((1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p21)))) OR ((1 <= p9)))) : E (F (E (X (A (X (((1 <= p17)))))))) : NOT(E ((((p72 <= 0)) U ((1 <= p49))))) : (E (F ((A (F (((1 <= p38)))) AND A (F (((1 <= p5))))))) AND ((p41 <= 0)))
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:461
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:323
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:98
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:183
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:326
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:476
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:326
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:401
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:326
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:323
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:338
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:449
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:326
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:395
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:326
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:338
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 222 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (A (X (E (G (((p25 <= 0) OR (p45 <= 0)))))) AND (((p73 <= 0) OR (((p64 <= 0)) AND ((p57 <= 0))) OR (((p53 <= 0)) AND ((p29 <= 0) OR (p11 <= 0)))) OR (E (G (((1 <= p40)))) AND (A (F (((1 <= p61) AND (1 <= p13)))) AND ((p34 <= 0) OR (p67 <= 0))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 222 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (X (E (G (((p25 <= 0) OR (p45 <= 0))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:808
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:812
lola: processed formula: AX(EG(((p25 <= 0) OR (p45 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 35
lola: 35 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 1 significant temporal operators and needs 5 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula.
lola: 41 markings, 41 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 237 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((p34 <= 0) OR (p67 <= 0))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: ((p34 <= 0) OR (p67 <= 0))
lola: processed formula length: 27
lola: 33 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: processed formula with 2 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 254 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((p73 <= 0) OR (((p64 <= 0)) AND ((p57 <= 0))) OR (((p53 <= 0)) AND ((p29 <= 0) OR (p11 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: ((p73 <= 0) OR (((p64 <= 0)) AND ((p57 <= 0))) OR (((p53 <= 0)) AND ((p29 <= 0) OR (p11 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 99
lola: 33 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: processed formula with 6 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: The Boolean predicate is true.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 237 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (E (G (A (F (((p8 <= 0)))))) AND (A (X (E (F (((1 <= p78)))))) AND (A (X (((1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p21)))) OR ((1 <= p9)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 237 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (G (A (F (((p8 <= 0))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:811
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:808
lola: processed formula: EG(AF(((p8 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 19
lola: 35 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 2 significant temporal operators and needs 9 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula.
lola: 136 markings, 236 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 254 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (X (E (F (((1 <= p78))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:806
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:812
lola: processed formula: AX(EF(((1 <= p78))))
lola: processed formula length: 20
lola: 35 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 1 significant temporal operators and needs 5 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula.
lola: 28 markings, 27 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 274 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((1 <= p9))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: ((1 <= p9))
lola: processed formula length: 11
lola: 33 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: processed formula with 1 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net violates the given property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 297 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (X (((1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p21))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:812
lola: processed formula: AX(((1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p21)))
lola: processed formula length: 31
lola: 34 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 0 significant temporal operators and needs 0 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The Boolean predicate is false.
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 254 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (X (E (F (A (X (((1 <= p17))))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:812
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:806
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:807
lola: processed formula: EX(EF(AX(((1 <= p17)))))
lola: processed formula length: 24
lola: 36 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 1 significant temporal operators and needs 5 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula.
lola: 99927 markings, 225188 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 274 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((p52 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: processed formula: A (G (((p52 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 20
lola: 35 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p52))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 26 markings, 25 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 297 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p21) AND (((1 <= p72)) OR ((1 <= p61))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: processed formula: E (F (((1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p21) AND (((1 <= p72)) OR ((1 <= p61))))))
lola: processed formula length: 71
lola: 34 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p21) AND (((1 <= p72)) OR ((1 <= p61))))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 6 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 43 markings, 42 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 324 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (A (G (((1 <= p69))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking possible invariance
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:604
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:614
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:726
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: processed formula: ((p69 <= 0))
lola: processed formula length: 12
lola: 37 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using tscc preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:700
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p69))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation task get result started, id 1
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 1
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 1
lola: formula 1: ((p69 <= 0))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 1
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to CTLFireability-5-1.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to CTLFireability-5-0.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file CTLFireability-5-1.sara.
sara: try reading problem file CTLFireability-5-0.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic


lola: state equation 1: solution produced
lola: state equation 0: solution produced
lola: sara is running 0 secs || sara is running 0 secs || 1562311 markings, 4627402 edges, 312462 markings/sec, 0 secs
lola: sara is running 5 secs || sara is running 5 secs || 2684599 markings, 8462847 edges, 224458 markings/sec, 5 secs
lola: sara is running 10 secs || sara is running 10 secs || 3875891 markings, 12876386 edges, 238258 markings/sec, 10 secs
lola: sara is running 15 secs || sara is running 15 secs || 4977605 markings, 17207223 edges, 220343 markings/sec, 15 secs
lola: sara is running 20 secs || sara is running 20 secs || 5955284 markings, 21316814 edges, 195536 markings/sec, 20 secs
lola: sara is running 25 secs || sara is running 25 secs || 6914365 markings, 25494451 edges, 191816 markings/sec, 25 secs
lola: sara is running 30 secs || sara is running 30 secs || 7778442 markings, 29481982 edges, 172815 markings/sec, 30 secs
lola: sara is running 35 secs || sara is running 35 secs || 8586286 markings, 33368350 edges, 161569 markings/sec, 35 secs
lola: sara is running 40 secs || sara is running 40 secs || 9341824 markings, 37174734 edges, 151108 markings/sec, 40 secs
lola: sara is running 45 secs || sara is running 45 secs || 10060469 markings, 40938784 edges, 143729 markings/sec, 45 secs
lola: sara is running 50 secs || sara is running 50 secs || 10749282 markings, 44671558 edges, 137763 markings/sec, 50 secs
lola: sara is running 55 secs || sara is running 55 secs || 11431928 markings, 48419511 edges, 136529 markings/sec, 55 secs
lola: sara is running 60 secs || sara is running 60 secs || 12087400 markings, 52143245 edges, 131094 markings/sec, 60 secs
lola: sara is running 65 secs || sara is running 65 secs || 12707939 markings, 55866633 edges, 124108 markings/sec, 65 secs
lola: sara is running 70 secs || sara is running 70 secs || 13320490 markings, 59583625 edges, 122510 markings/sec, 70 secs
lola: sara is running 75 secs || sara is running 75 secs || 13903132 markings, 63164167 edges, 116528 markings/sec, 75 secs
lola: sara is running 80 secs || sara is running 80 secs || 14524155 markings, 67047850 edges, 124205 markings/sec, 80 secs
lola: sara is running 85 secs || sara is running 85 secs || 15185943 markings, 71111653 edges, 132358 markings/sec, 85 secs
lola: sara is running 90 secs || sara is running 90 secs || 15596941 markings, 74551311 edges, 82200 markings/sec, 90 secs
lola: sara is running 95 secs || sara is running 95 secs || 15651041 markings, 76782343 edges, 10820 markings/sec, 95 secs
lola: sara is running 100 secs || sara is running 100 secs || 15677323 markings, 78982941 edges, 5256 markings/sec, 100 secs
lola: sara is running 105 secs || sara is running 105 secs || 15685200 markings, 81160411 edges, 1575 markings/sec, 105 secs
lola: sara is running 110 secs || sara is running 110 secs || 15693786 markings, 83469183 edges, 1717 markings/sec, 110 secs
lola: sara is running 115 secs || sara is running 115 secs || 15697962 markings, 85967703 edges, 835 markings/sec, 115 secs
lola: sara is running 120 secs || sara is running 120 secs || 15702142 markings, 88573101 edges, 836 markings/sec, 120 secs
lola: sara is running 125 secs || sara is running 125 secs || 15703526 markings, 91283147 edges, 277 markings/sec, 125 secs
lola: sara is running 130 secs || sara is running 130 secs || 15704388 markings, 94197800 edges, 172 markings/sec, 130 secs
lola: sara is running 135 secs || sara is running 135 secs || 16191782 markings, 98596173 edges, 97479 markings/sec, 135 secs
lola: sara is running 140 secs || sara is running 140 secs || 17094643 markings, 103711330 edges, 180572 markings/sec, 140 secs
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: parallel
lola: The predicate is not possibly invariant.
lola: 17903046 markings, 108420426 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 341 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (E (G (((1 <= p36))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability of possible preservation
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:598
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:633
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:730
lola: processed formula: ((1 <= p36))
lola: processed formula length: 12
lola: 36 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space /EFEG)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (EFEG version) (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 1
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 1
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 1
lola: formula 1: ((1 <= p36))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 1
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space /EFEG
lola: The predicate is possibly preserved from a reachable marking.
lola: 93 markings, 94 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 379 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (E (G (((1 <= p54))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability of possible preservation
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:598
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:633
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:730
lola: processed formula: ((1 <= p54))
lola: processed formula length: 12
lola: 36 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space /EFEG)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (EFEG version) (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: state equation task get result started, id 1
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((p54 <= 0))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 1
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 1
lola: formula 1: ((1 <= p54))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 1
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space /EFEG
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to CTLFireability-7-0.sara
lola: The predicate is possibly preserved from a reachable marking.
lola: 249 markings, 268 edges
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 427 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (E (G (((1 <= p42))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability of possible preservation
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:598
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:633
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:730
lola: processed formula: ((1 <= p42))
lola: processed formula length: 12
lola: 36 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space /EFEG)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (EFEG version) (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
sara: try reading problem file CTLFireability-7-0.sara.
lola: state equation task get result started, id 1
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 1
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 1
lola: formula 1: ((1 <= p42))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 1
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space /EFEG
lola: The predicate is possibly preserved from a reachable marking.
lola: 146 markings, 146 edges
lola: ========================================
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministiclola:
subprocess 9 will run for 488 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (F (((1 <= p42))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking eventual occurrence
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:584
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:749
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: processed formula: ((p42 <= 0))
lola: processed formula length: 12
lola: 36 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space / EG)
lola: state space: using search routine for EG formula (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using EG preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING

lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:700
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p42))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space / EG
lola: The predicate does not eventually occur.
lola: 124 markings, 125 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 569 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (A (G (((((1 <= p56)) OR ((1 <= p8))) AND (((1 <= p76)) OR ((1 <= p64))))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking possible invariance
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:604
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:614
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:726
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: processed formula: ((((p56 <= 0)) AND ((p8 <= 0))) OR (((p76 <= 0)) AND ((p64 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 68
lola: 37 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using tscc preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: state equation task get result started, id 1
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 1
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 1
lola: formula 1: ((((p56 <= 0)) AND ((p8 <= 0))) OR (((p76 <= 0)) AND ((p64 <= 0))))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 1
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:700
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((((1 <= p56)) OR ((1 <= p8))) AND (((1 <= p76)) OR ((1 <= p64))))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 8 literals and 4 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to CTLFireability-10-1.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to CTLFireability-10-0.sara
sara: try reading problem file CTLFireability-10-1.sara.
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file CTLFireability-10-0.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic

sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: state equation 1: solution produced
sara: warning, failure of lp_solve (at job 63)
lola: sara is running 0 secs || sara is running 0 secs || 1488015 markings, 4379703 edges, 297603 markings/sec, 0 secs
lola: sara is running 5 secs || sara is running 5 secs || 2496726 markings, 7803198 edges, 201742 markings/sec, 5 secs
lola: sara is running 10 secs || sara is running 10 secs || 3416682 markings, 11150638 edges, 183991 markings/sec, 10 secs
lola: sara is running 15 secs || sara is running 15 secs || 4355732 markings, 14743248 edges, 187810 markings/sec, 15 secs
lola: sara is running 20 secs || sara is running 20 secs || 5297455 markings, 18529311 edges, 188345 markings/sec, 20 secs
lola: sara is running 25 secs || sara is running 25 secs || 6238184 markings, 22538746 edges, 188146 markings/sec, 25 secs
lola: sara is running 30 secs || sara is running 30 secs || 7142072 markings, 26523696 edges, 180778 markings/sec, 30 secs
lola: sara is running 35 secs || sara is running 35 secs || 7961496 markings, 30339664 edges, 163885 markings/sec, 35 secs
lola: sara is running 40 secs || sara is running 40 secs || 8782541 markings, 34328064 edges, 164209 markings/sec, 40 secs
lola: sara is running 45 secs || sara is running 45 secs || 9610595 markings, 38568570 edges, 165611 markings/sec, 45 secs
lola: sara is running 50 secs || sara is running 50 secs || 10370612 markings, 42597692 edges, 152003 markings/sec, 50 secs
lola: sara is running 55 secs || sara is running 55 secs || 11115589 markings, 46676962 edges, 148995 markings/sec, 55 secs
lola: sara is running 60 secs || sara is running 60 secs || 11893435 markings, 51012361 edges, 155569 markings/sec, 60 secs
lola: sara is running 65 secs || sara is running 65 secs || 12604082 markings, 55234899 edges, 142129 markings/sec, 65 secs
lola: sara is running 70 secs || sara is running 70 secs || 13296083 markings, 59437490 edges, 138400 markings/sec, 70 secs
lola: sara is running 75 secs || sara is running 75 secs || 13955223 markings, 63495842 edges, 131828 markings/sec, 75 secs
lola: sara is running 80 secs || sara is running 80 secs || 14647999 markings, 67801326 edges, 138555 markings/sec, 80 secs
lola: sara is running 85 secs || sara is running 85 secs || 15373904 markings, 72366375 edges, 145181 markings/sec, 85 secs
lola: sara is running 90 secs || sara is running 90 secs || 15625010 markings, 75463015 edges, 50221 markings/sec, 90 secs
lola: sara is running 95 secs || sara is running 95 secs || 15670639 markings, 78220824 edges, 9126 markings/sec, 95 secs
lola: sara is running 100 secs || sara is running 100 secs || 15684927 markings, 81008339 edges, 2858 markings/sec, 100 secs
lola: sara is running 105 secs || sara is running 105 secs || 15694596 markings, 83852672 edges, 1934 markings/sec, 105 secs
lola: sara is running 110 secs || sara is running 110 secs || 15699596 markings, 86843444 edges, 1000 markings/sec, 110 secs
lola: sara is running 115 secs || sara is running 115 secs || 15702963 markings, 90050559 edges, 673 markings/sec, 115 secs
lola: sara is running 120 secs || sara is running 120 secs || 15704266 markings, 93325853 edges, 261 markings/sec, 120 secs
lola: sara is running 125 secs || sara is running 125 secs || 15938207 markings, 97076554 edges, 46788 markings/sec, 125 secs
lola: sara is running 130 secs || sara is running 130 secs || 16925640 markings, 102604546 edges, 197487 markings/sec, 130 secs
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: parallel
lola: The predicate is not possibly invariant.
lola: 17903046 markings, 108189753 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 655 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((E (G (((1 <= p0)))) OR A (F (((p71 <= 0)))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:808
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:811
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:813
lola: processed formula: AG((EG(((1 <= p0))) OR AF(((p71 <= 0)))))
lola: processed formula length: 41
lola: 36 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 3 significant temporal operators and needs 13 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: 1651184 markings, 5085201 edges, 330237 markings/sec, 0 secs
lola: 2866192 markings, 10051061 edges, 243002 markings/sec, 5 secs
lola: 3663124 markings, 14305625 edges, 159386 markings/sec, 10 secs
lola: 4343330 markings, 18086283 edges, 136041 markings/sec, 15 secs
lola: 4955745 markings, 21734040 edges, 122483 markings/sec, 20 secs
lola: 5472271 markings, 25174712 edges, 103305 markings/sec, 25 secs
lola: 5979551 markings, 28604681 edges, 101456 markings/sec, 30 secs
lola: 6459766 markings, 31850386 edges, 96043 markings/sec, 35 secs
lola: 6935648 markings, 35158748 edges, 95176 markings/sec, 40 secs
lola: 7407214 markings, 38577711 edges, 94313 markings/sec, 45 secs
lola: 7867983 markings, 41974483 edges, 92154 markings/sec, 50 secs
lola: 8290328 markings, 45193195 edges, 84469 markings/sec, 55 secs
lola: 8790262 markings, 48991286 edges, 99987 markings/sec, 60 secs
lola: 9289230 markings, 52911611 edges, 99794 markings/sec, 65 secs
lola: 9759612 markings, 56661443 edges, 94076 markings/sec, 70 secs
lola: 10203091 markings, 60321627 edges, 88696 markings/sec, 75 secs
lola: 10638201 markings, 64054848 edges, 87022 markings/sec, 80 secs
lola: 11091520 markings, 68028387 edges, 90664 markings/sec, 85 secs
lola: 11523974 markings, 72067204 edges, 86491 markings/sec, 90 secs
lola: 11909490 markings, 75778327 edges, 77103 markings/sec, 95 secs
lola: 12295795 markings, 79511654 edges, 77261 markings/sec, 100 secs
lola: 12706129 markings, 83493335 edges, 82067 markings/sec, 105 secs
lola: 13086701 markings, 87294412 edges, 76114 markings/sec, 110 secs
lola: 13470214 markings, 91318245 edges, 76703 markings/sec, 115 secs
lola: 13829366 markings, 95321741 edges, 71830 markings/sec, 120 secs
lola: 14179801 markings, 99120394 edges, 70087 markings/sec, 125 secs
lola: 14553219 markings, 103080515 edges, 74684 markings/sec, 130 secs
lola: 14940303 markings, 107577826 edges, 77417 markings/sec, 135 secs
lola: 15309860 markings, 112306244 edges, 73911 markings/sec, 140 secs
lola: 15607772 markings, 116323331 edges, 59582 markings/sec, 145 secs
lola: 15665845 markings, 118931147 edges, 11615 markings/sec, 150 secs
lola: 15684663 markings, 121379374 edges, 3764 markings/sec, 155 secs
lola: 15691589 markings, 123804678 edges, 1385 markings/sec, 160 secs
lola: 15697522 markings, 126210911 edges, 1187 markings/sec, 165 secs
lola: 15700235 markings, 128600669 edges, 543 markings/sec, 170 secs
lola: 15702900 markings, 130976633 edges, 533 markings/sec, 175 secs
lola: 15703888 markings, 133349397 edges, 198 markings/sec, 180 secs
lola: 15704367 markings, 135699028 edges, 96 markings/sec, 185 secs
lola: 15744052 markings, 138242818 edges, 7937 markings/sec, 190 secs
lola: 16416808 markings, 143647387 edges, 134551 markings/sec, 195 secs
lola: 17131875 markings, 149267683 edges, 143013 markings/sec, 200 secs
lola: 17834788 markings, 155066237 edges, 140583 markings/sec, 205 secs
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula.
lola: 17903046 markings, 155655956 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 766 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (F ((A (G (((1 <= p71)))) AND (A (G (((1 <= p53)))) OR ((1 <= p43) AND (1 <= p77) AND (((1 <= p37)) OR ((1 <= p30))))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:813
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:813
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:811
lola: processed formula: AF((AG(((1 <= p71))) AND (AG(((1 <= p53))) OR ((1 <= p43) AND (1 <= p77) AND (((1 <= p37)) OR ((1 <= p30)))))))
lola: processed formula length: 112
lola: 36 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 3 significant temporal operators and needs 13 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula.
lola: 42 markings, 84 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 1022 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A ((((1 <= p72)) R ((p49 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking universal release
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:619
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:737
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:693
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: processed formula: A ((((1 <= p72)) R ((p49 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 33
lola: 38 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space /EU)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (EU version) (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using eu preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p49))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space /EU
lola: Predicate Phi does not release Predicate Psi on all paths.
lola: 37 markings, 36 edges
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 14 will run for 1533 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (E (F ((A (F (((1 <= p38)))) AND A (F (((1 <= p5))))))) AND ((p41 <= 0)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 14 will run for 1533 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((p41 <= 0))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: ((p41 <= 0))
lola: processed formula length: 12
lola: 33 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: processed formula with 1 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 3067 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((A (F (((1 <= p38)))) AND A (F (((1 <= p5)))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:811
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:811
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:806
lola: processed formula: EF((AF(((1 <= p38))) AND AF(((1 <= p5)))))
lola: processed formula length: 42
lola: 36 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 3 significant temporal operators and needs 13 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: 860434 markings, 4301677 edges, 172087 markings/sec, 0 secs
lola: 1541740 markings, 7971139 edges, 136261 markings/sec, 5 secs
lola: 2127409 markings, 11216838 edges, 117134 markings/sec, 10 secs
lola: 2685212 markings, 14371787 edges, 111561 markings/sec, 15 secs
lola: 3242126 markings, 17616580 edges, 111383 markings/sec, 20 secs
lola: 3792514 markings, 20866931 edges, 110078 markings/sec, 25 secs
lola: 4363857 markings, 24321370 edges, 114269 markings/sec, 30 secs
lola: 4932412 markings, 27794604 edges, 113711 markings/sec, 35 secs
lola: 5469645 markings, 31185166 edges, 107447 markings/sec, 40 secs
lola: 5992653 markings, 34542270 edges, 104602 markings/sec, 45 secs
lola: 6503736 markings, 37843828 edges, 102217 markings/sec, 50 secs
lola: 7002866 markings, 41118831 edges, 99826 markings/sec, 55 secs
lola: 7492232 markings, 44420289 edges, 97873 markings/sec, 60 secs
lola: 7975259 markings, 47710748 edges, 96605 markings/sec, 65 secs
lola: 8453980 markings, 51040718 edges, 95744 markings/sec, 70 secs
lola: 8925323 markings, 54387007 edges, 94269 markings/sec, 75 secs
lola: 9360338 markings, 57519692 edges, 87003 markings/sec, 80 secs
lola: 9786877 markings, 60652044 edges, 85308 markings/sec, 85 secs
lola: 10227786 markings, 63933515 edges, 88182 markings/sec, 90 secs
lola: 10668224 markings, 67262585 edges, 88088 markings/sec, 95 secs
lola: 11112475 markings, 70636440 edges, 88850 markings/sec, 100 secs
lola: 11552324 markings, 73999669 edges, 87970 markings/sec, 105 secs
lola: 11974787 markings, 77293640 edges, 84493 markings/sec, 110 secs
lola: 12398064 markings, 80680270 edges, 84655 markings/sec, 115 secs
lola: 12821369 markings, 84143927 edges, 84661 markings/sec, 120 secs
lola: 13261968 markings, 87761398 edges, 88120 markings/sec, 125 secs
lola: 13679533 markings, 91192271 edges, 83513 markings/sec, 130 secs
lola: 14089380 markings, 94581893 edges, 81969 markings/sec, 135 secs
lola: 14533129 markings, 98284835 edges, 88750 markings/sec, 140 secs
lola: 15005532 markings, 102176397 edges, 94481 markings/sec, 145 secs
lola: 15421417 markings, 105802664 edges, 83177 markings/sec, 150 secs
lola: 15613032 markings, 108417082 edges, 38323 markings/sec, 155 secs
lola: 15650548 markings, 110291401 edges, 7503 markings/sec, 160 secs
lola: 15672102 markings, 112018469 edges, 4311 markings/sec, 165 secs
lola: 15682748 markings, 113814109 edges, 2129 markings/sec, 170 secs
lola: 15689020 markings, 115672214 edges, 1254 markings/sec, 175 secs
lola: 15694872 markings, 117558701 edges, 1170 markings/sec, 180 secs
lola: 15698055 markings, 119579737 edges, 637 markings/sec, 185 secs
lola: 15701877 markings, 121790755 edges, 764 markings/sec, 190 secs
lola: 15703188 markings, 124094039 edges, 262 markings/sec, 195 secs
lola: 15704195 markings, 126525773 edges, 201 markings/sec, 200 secs
lola: 15704465 markings, 129189198 edges, 54 markings/sec, 205 secs
lola: 16182712 markings, 133238234 edges, 95649 markings/sec, 210 secs
lola: 16820738 markings, 138091626 edges, 127605 markings/sec, 215 secs
lola: 17487874 markings, 143293532 edges, 133427 markings/sec, 220 secs
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula.
lola: 17903046 markings, 146619767 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The Boolean predicate is false.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 2839 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (A (F ((((p70 <= 0)) AND ((p76 <= 0))))) AND (E ((((p11 <= 0)) R ((p42 <= 0)))) AND E (F ((((1 <= p16)) AND E (G (((1 <= p23)))))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 2839 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E ((((p11 <= 0)) R ((p42 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking existential release
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:576
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:736
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:696
lola: processed formula: E ((((p11 <= 0)) R ((p42 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 33
lola: 36 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space /ER)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (ER version) (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using ltl preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: 1
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p42))
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space /ER
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: There is a path where Predicate Phi releases Predicate Psi.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: ========================================
lola: Child process aborted or communication problem between parent and child process
lola: subprocess 17 will run for 1 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((((1 <= p16)) AND E (G (((1 <= p23)))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking an existential CTL formula with single witness path (use LTL...)
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:658
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:659
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:661
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:666
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:668
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:659
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:662
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:668
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:679
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:679
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: G ((((p16 <= 0)) OR F (((p23 <= 0)))))
lola: processed formula length: 38
lola: 43 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 2 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm(--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The existential single path CTL formula holds.
lola: 5082 markings, 5808 edges
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: unknown
lola: The Boolean predicate may be true or false.
lola: ========================================
lola: ========================================
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (A (F ((((p70 <= 0)) AND ((p76 <= 0))))) AND (E ((((p11 <= 0)) R ((p42 <= 0)))) AND E (F ((((1 <= p16)) AND E (G (((1 <= p23)))))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E ((((p11 <= 0)) R ((p42 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking existential release
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:576
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:736
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:696
lola: processed formula: E ((((p11 <= 0)) R ((p42 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 33
lola: 36 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space /ER)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (ER version) (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using ltl preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p42))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: 1
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space /ER
lola: There is a path where Predicate Phi releases Predicate Psi.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (F ((((p70 <= 0)) AND ((p76 <= 0)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking eventual occurrence
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:584
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:749
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: processed formula: (((1 <= p70)) OR ((1 <= p76)))
lola: processed formula length: 31
lola: 36 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space / EG)
lola: state space: using search routine for EG formula (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using EG preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:700
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space / EG
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: (((p70 <= 0)) AND ((p76 <= 0)))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: The predicate eventually occurs.
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: 1 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((((1 <= p16)) AND E (G (((1 <= p23)))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking an existential CTL formula with single witness path (use LTL...)
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:658
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:659
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:661
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:666
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:668
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:659
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:662
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:668
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:679
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:679
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: G ((((p16 <= 0)) OR F (((p23 <= 0)))))
lola: processed formula length: 38
lola: 43 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 2 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm(--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The existential single path CTL formula holds.
lola: 5082 markings, 5808 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: The Boolean predicate is true.
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: yes yes yes no no no yes no yes no yes yes no yes no no
lola:
preliminary result: yes yes yes no no no yes no yes no yes yes no yes no no
lola: memory consumption: 35964 KB
lola: time consumption: 732 seconds
lola: print data as JSON (--json)
lola: writing JSON to CTLFireability.json
lola: closed JSON file CTLFireability.json
rslt: finished

--------------------
content from stderr:

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-001B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itslola"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itslola"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-001B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r211-tajo-159033477700580"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-001B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-001B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;