fond
Model Checking Contest 2020
10th edition, Paris, France, June 23, 2020
Execution of r211-tajo-159033477500503
Last Updated
Jun 28, 2020

About the Execution of ITS-LoLa for ShieldPPPs-PT-020B

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
15743.160 3600000.00 224760.00 165.30 ?TFTFTTFTFFFFFTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.r211-tajo-159033477500503.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itslola
Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-020B, examination is ReachabilityFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r211-tajo-159033477500503
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 520K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 14 01:37 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 14 01:37 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.8K May 13 19:00 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 13 19:00 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 14 10:03 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 14 10:03 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K May 14 10:03 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 14 10:03 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 May 12 20:42 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 13 13:55 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 13 13:55 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 13 08:39 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 13 08:39 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 13 16:53 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 13 16:53 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 12 20:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 349K May 12 20:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1591309928985

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
[2020-06-04 22:32:10] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, ReachabilityFireability, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -timeout, 3600, -rebuildPNML]
[2020-06-04 22:32:10] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2020-06-04 22:32:10] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 119 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:10] [INFO ] Transformed 1363 places.
[2020-06-04 22:32:10] [INFO ] Transformed 1263 transitions.
[2020-06-04 22:32:10] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2020-06-04 22:32:10] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1363 places and 1263 transitions in 190 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/ReachabilityFireability.xml in 38 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 77 ms. (steps per millisecond=129 ) properties seen :[0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1]
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 0 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=384 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 0 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=555 ) properties seen :[0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 0 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=555 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 0 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=434 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 0 resets, run finished after 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=322 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 0 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=357 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
// Phase 1: matrix 1263 rows 1363 cols
[2020-06-04 22:32:11] [INFO ] Computed 221 place invariants in 30 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 221 positive place invariants in 175 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:11] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:32:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 3020 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 727 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 605 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:16] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream closed (> (+ s0 s1 s2 s1162 s1163 s1164 s1173 s1174 s1179 s1187 s1188 s1189 s1192 s1193 s1205 s1206 s1207 s1208 s1215 s1216 s1217) 0)") while checking expression at index 0
[2020-06-04 22:32:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 221 positive place invariants in 165 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:16] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:32:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 3250 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 601 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 580 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 431 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:21] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream closed (> (+ s0 s1 s2 s3 s4 s1028 s1029 s1030 s1031 s1036 s1037 s1038 s1070 s1073) 0)") while checking expression at index 1
[2020-06-04 22:32:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 221 positive place invariants in 151 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:22] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:32:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 3326 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 638 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 611 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:26] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-06-04 22:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 772 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:27] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream closed (> (+ s0 s1 s2 s1162 s1163 s1164 s1165 s1166 s1167 s1168 s1169 s1173 s1174 s1175 s1178 s1179) 0)") while checking expression at index 2
[2020-06-04 22:32:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 221 positive place invariants in 185 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:27] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:32:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 3117 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 658 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 693 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 986 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:33] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream closed (> (+ s0 s1 s2 s1162 s1163 s1164 s1165 s1166 s1167 s1168 s1169 s1173 s1174 s1175 s1178 s1179) 0)") while checking expression at index 3
[2020-06-04 22:32:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 221 positive place invariants in 220 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:33] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:32:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 3234 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 608 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 452 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 441 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:38] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream closed (> (+ s0 s1 s2 s3 s1095 s1096 s1097 s1098 s1099 s1100 s1101 s1102 s1106 s1138 s1139 s1140) 0)") while checking expression at index 4
Support contains 39 out of 1363 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 1363/1363 places, 1263/1263 transitions.
Performed 141 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 141
Iterating post reduction 0 with 141 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 1363 transition count 1122
Reduce places removed 141 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 141 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 1222 transition count 1122
Performed 98 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 98 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 1222 transition count 1024
Deduced a syphon composed of 98 places in 5 ms
Reduce places removed 98 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 196 rules applied. Total rules applied 478 place count 1124 transition count 1024
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 135 rule applications. Total rules 613 place count 1124 transition count 1024
Deduced a syphon composed of 135 places in 4 ms
Reduce places removed 135 places and 135 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 270 rules applied. Total rules applied 883 place count 989 transition count 889
Performed 57 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 57 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 883 place count 989 transition count 832
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 997 place count 932 transition count 832
Performed 282 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 282
Deduced a syphon composed of 282 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 282 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 564 rules applied. Total rules applied 1561 place count 650 transition count 550
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 163 times.
Drop transitions removed 163 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 163 rules applied. Total rules applied 1724 place count 650 transition count 550
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1726 place count 650 transition count 550
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1727 place count 649 transition count 549
Applied a total of 1727 rules in 449 ms. Remains 649 /1363 variables (removed 714) and now considering 549/1263 (removed 714) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 649/1363 places, 549/1263 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 1000000 steps, including 403 resets, run finished after 6331 ms. (steps per millisecond=157 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 0, 1, 1]
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 3452 ms. (steps per millisecond=289 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 0]
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000001 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 2998 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 0]
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 2806 ms. (steps per millisecond=356 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 1]
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
// Phase 1: matrix 549 rows 649 cols
[2020-06-04 22:32:55] [INFO ] Computed 221 place invariants in 15 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 208 positive place invariants in 831 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 208 positive and 13 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:56] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:32:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 776 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:56] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 22:32:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 208 positive place invariants in 134 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 208 positive and 13 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:32:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 907 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 131 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 178 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 110 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 145 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 128 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 105 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 106 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 113 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 116 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 106 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 101 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 94 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms
[2020-06-04 22:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 121 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 113 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 100 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 111 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 130 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 118 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 143 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 127 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 147 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 112 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 116 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 82 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 90 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 84 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 80 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 99 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 80 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:02] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 35/34 trap constraints in 4497 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:02] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 542/1669/542 causal constraints in 47 ms.
[2020-06-04 22:33:14] [INFO ] Added : 503 causal constraints over 102 iterations in 12201 ms. Result :unknown
[2020-06-04 22:33:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 208 positive place invariants in 116 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:33:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 208 positive and 13 generalized place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:33:14] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:33:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 880 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:33:15] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 22:33:16] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 208 positive place invariants in 79 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:33:16] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 208 positive and 13 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:33:16] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:33:16] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 749 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 160 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 135 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 125 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 101 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 94 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 112 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:17] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 7 trap constraints in 1051 ms
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-020B-ReachabilityFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
Incomplete Parikh walk after 50300 steps, including 664 resets, run finished after 340 ms. (steps per millisecond=147 ) properties seen :[0] could not realise parikh vector
Support contains 12 out of 649 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 649/649 places, 549/549 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 649 transition count 548
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 648 transition count 548
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 648 transition count 546
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 646 transition count 546
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 631 transition count 531
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 7 times.
Drop transitions removed 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 631 transition count 531
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 631 transition count 531
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 630 transition count 530
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 629 transition count 529
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 628 transition count 528
Applied a total of 50 rules in 219 ms. Remains 628 /649 variables (removed 21) and now considering 528/549 (removed 21) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 628/649 places, 528/549 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 1000000 steps, including 240 resets, run finished after 5996 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties seen :[0]
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000001 steps, including 22 resets, run finished after 2992 ms. (steps per millisecond=334 ) properties seen :[0]
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 4211083 steps, run timeout after 30001 ms. (steps per millisecond=140 ) properties seen :[0]
Probabilistic random walk after 4211083 steps, saw 492168 distinct states, run finished after 30001 ms. (steps per millisecond=140 ) properties seen :[0]
// Phase 1: matrix 528 rows 628 cols
[2020-06-04 22:33:57] [INFO ] Computed 221 place invariants in 14 ms
[2020-06-04 22:33:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 214 positive place invariants in 111 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:33:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 214 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:33:57] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:33:58] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 851 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:33:58] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 22:33:58] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 214 positive place invariants in 111 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:33:58] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 214 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:33:58] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:33:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 901 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 200 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 176 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 191 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 193 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 184 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 188 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 179 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 193 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 208 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 178 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 190 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 165 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 182 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 192 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 173 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 176 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 168 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 163 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 140 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 201 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 144 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 156 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 197 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 136 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 122 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 123 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 126 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 138 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 142 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 130 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 151 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 132 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 128 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 103 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 104 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 122 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 109 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 109 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:06] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 40/39 trap constraints in 7118 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:06] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 524/1575/524 causal constraints in 50 ms.
[2020-06-04 22:34:19] [INFO ] Added : 485 causal constraints over 101 iterations in 12916 ms. Result :unknown
Incomplete Parikh walk after 46800 steps, including 755 resets, run finished after 321 ms. (steps per millisecond=145 ) properties seen :[0] could not realise parikh vector
Support contains 12 out of 628 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 628/628 places, 528/528 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 628 /628 variables (removed 0) and now considering 528/528 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 628/628 places, 528/528 transitions.
Starting structural reductions, iteration 0 : 628/628 places, 528/528 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 628 /628 variables (removed 0) and now considering 528/528 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 528 rows 628 cols
[2020-06-04 22:34:20] [INFO ] Computed 221 place invariants in 19 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1744 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 528 rows 628 cols
[2020-06-04 22:34:21] [INFO ] Computed 221 place invariants in 3 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 4054 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 5802 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2020-06-04 22:34:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 71 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 528 rows 628 cols
[2020-06-04 22:34:25] [INFO ] Computed 221 place invariants in 6 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:27] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 1055 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 628/628 places, 528/528 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 24 resets, run finished after 538 ms. (steps per millisecond=185 ) properties seen :[0]
// Phase 1: matrix 528 rows 628 cols
[2020-06-04 22:34:27] [INFO ] Computed 221 place invariants in 3 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 214 positive place invariants in 110 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 214 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:27] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:34:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 854 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:28] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 22:34:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 214 positive place invariants in 109 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 214 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:34:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 897 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 214 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 204 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 189 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 208 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 160 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 193 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 168 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 139 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 204 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 192 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 165 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 163 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 176 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 189 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 164 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 162 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 192 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 178 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 163 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 161 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 168 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 144 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 137 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 140 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 161 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 124 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 126 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 124 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 125 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 136 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 149 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 142 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 150 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 122 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 139 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 145 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 131 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 127 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 125 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:37] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 40/39 trap constraints in 7276 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:37] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 524/1575/524 causal constraints in 34 ms.
[2020-06-04 22:34:48] [INFO ] Added : 485 causal constraints over 101 iterations in 11583 ms. Result :unknown
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 628 transition count 528
Applied a total of 2 rules in 55 ms. Remains 628 /628 variables (removed 0) and now considering 528/528 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 528 rows 628 cols
[2020-06-04 22:34:48] [INFO ] Computed 221 place invariants in 6 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:48] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 215 positive place invariants in 111 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:48] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 215 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:48] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:34:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 825 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2020-06-04 22:34:49] [INFO ] [Real]Added 2 Read/Feed constraints in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 184 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 154 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 158 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 166 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 191 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 185 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 170 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 166 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 164 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 127 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 129 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 113 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 136 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 141 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 121 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 145 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 152 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 141 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 145 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 133 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 101 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 117 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:54] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 29/28 trap constraints in 4743 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:54] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 22:34:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 215 positive place invariants in 108 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 215 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 22:34:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 848 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 2 Read/Feed constraints in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 22:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 166 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 116 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 121 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 119 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 89 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 90 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:56] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 9/8 trap constraints in 1127 ms
[2020-06-04 22:34:56] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 524/1584/524 causal constraints in 37 ms.
[2020-06-04 22:35:08] [INFO ] Added : 483 causal constraints over 97 iterations in 11995 ms. Result :unknown
[2020-06-04 22:35:08] [INFO ] Export to MCC properties in file /home/mcc/execution/ReachabilityFireability.sr.xml took 4 ms.
[2020-06-04 22:35:08] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml took 25 ms.
[2020-06-04 22:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 140 ms
info: Time: 3600 - MCC
vrfy: Checking ReachabilityFireability @ ShieldPPPs-PT-020B @ 3570 seconds
vrfy: finished
info: timeLeft: 3566
rslt: Output for ReachabilityFireability @ ShieldPPPs-PT-020B

{
"build":
{
"architecture": 64,
"assertions": false,
"build_hostname": "mcc2019",
"build_system": "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu",
"optimizations": true,
"package_version": "2.0",
"svn_version": "3189M"
},
"call":
{
"exec_host": "mcc2020",
"localtimelimit": 0,
"markinglimit": null,
"parameters":
[
"--pnmlnet",
"model.pnml",
"--xmlformula",
"--formula=ReachabilityFireability.xml",
"--mcc",
"--donotcomputecapacities",
"--encoder=simplecompressed",
"--check=modelchecking",
"--stubborn=tarjan",
"--stateequation=par",
"--timelimit=3570",
"--localtimelimit=0",
"--json=ReachabilityFireability.json",
"--jsoninclude=formula,formulastat,net"
],
"starttime": "Thu Jun 4 22:35:09 2020
",
"timelimit": 3570
},
"child": null,
"exit":
{
"error": null,
"localtimelimitreached": true,
"memory": 23204,
"runtime": 4.000000,
"signal": null,
"timelimitreached": false
},
"files":
{
"formula": "ReachabilityFireability.xml",
"net": "model.pnml"
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 5,
"adisj": 3,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 12,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 12,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 12,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "E (F (((1 <= p21) AND (1 <= p417) AND (1 <= p439) AND ((p244 <= 0)) AND (1 <= p192) AND (((1 <= p378)) OR ((1 <= p40) AND (1 <= p62))) AND (((1 <= p39) AND (1 <= p41)) OR ((1 <= p51) AND (1 <= p61))))))",
"processed_size": 204,
"rewrites": 1,
"skeleton": "E(F(**))"
},
"net":
{
"arcs": 2331,
"conflict_clusters": 113,
"places": 628,
"places_significant": 407,
"singleton_clusters": 0,
"transitions": 528
},
"task":
{
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion"
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 34,
"problems": 4
},
"type": "reachability",
"workflow": "stateequation||search"
}
}
lola: LoLA will run for 3570 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: input: PNML file (--pnml)
lola: reading net from model.pnml
lola: reading pnml
lola: PNML file contains place/transition net
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml
lola: 1156/268435456 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: Size of bit vector: 20096
lola: finding significant places
lola: 628 places, 528 transitions, 407 significant places
lola: compute conflict clusters
lola: computed conflict clusters
lola: Computing conflicting sets
lola: Computing back conflicting sets
lola: TASK
lola: Reading formula in XML format (--xmlformula)
lola: reading pnml
lola: reading formula from ReachabilityFireability.xml
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p21 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p417 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p439 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p244 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p192 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p378 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p40 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p62 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p39 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p41 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p51 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p61 <= 1)
lola: E (F (((1 <= p21) AND (1 <= p417) AND (1 <= p439) AND ((p244 <= 0)) AND (1 <= p192) AND (((1 <= p378)) OR ((1 <= p40) AND (1 <= p62))) AND (((1 <= p39) AND (1 <= p41)) OR ((1 <= p51) AND (1 <= p61))))))
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: processed formula: E (F (((1 <= p21) AND (1 <= p417) AND (1 <= p439) AND ((p244 <= 0)) AND (1 <= p192) AND (((1 <= p378)) OR ((1 <= p40) AND (1 <= p62))) AND (((1 <= p39) AND (1 <= p41)) OR ((1 <= p51) AND (1 <= p61))))))
lola: processed formula length: 204
lola: 1 rewrites
lola: closed formula file ReachabilityFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess will run for 0 seconds at most (--localtimelimit)
lola: local time limit reached - aborting
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p21) AND (1 <= p417) AND (1 <= p439) AND ((p244 <= 0)) AND (1 <= p192) AND (((1 <= p378)) OR ((1 <= p40) AND (1 <= p62))) AND (((1 <= p39) AND (1 <= p41)) OR ((1 <= p51) AND (1 <= p61))))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 34 literals and 4 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to ReachabilityFireability-0.sara
lola: memory consumption: 23204 KB
lola: time consumption: 4 seconds
lola: print data as JSON (--json)
lola: writing JSON to ReachabilityFireability.json
lola: closed JSON file ReachabilityFireability.json
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
rslt: finished

--------------------
content from stderr:

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPs-PT-020B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itslola"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itslola"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-020B, examination is ReachabilityFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r211-tajo-159033477500503"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPs-PT-020B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPs-PT-020B execution
cd execution
if [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME ReachabilityFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;