fond
Model Checking Contest 2020
10th edition, Paris, France, June 23, 2020
Execution of r178-tajo-158987882800763
Last Updated
Jun 28, 2020

About the Execution of ITS-LoLa for DoubleExponent-PT-003

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
15741.250 3600000.00 35967.00 57.70 FTFFTTTFFFFFFTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.r178-tajo-158987882800763.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itslola
Input is DoubleExponent-PT-003, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r178-tajo-158987882800763
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 232K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Mar 31 07:41 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Mar 31 07:41 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Mar 30 00:27 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Mar 30 00:27 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Mar 24 05:37 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K Mar 24 05:37 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Apr 8 14:52 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 28 14:00 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 8 14:52 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 28 14:00 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K Mar 28 14:45 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Mar 28 14:45 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.8K Mar 27 07:46 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Mar 27 07:46 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Mar 28 14:50 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Mar 28 14:50 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 24 05:37 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 Mar 24 05:37 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 24 05:37 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K Mar 24 05:37 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1591239131891

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
[2020-06-04 02:52:13] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -timeout, 3600, -rebuildPNML]
[2020-06-04 02:52:13] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2020-06-04 02:52:13] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 45 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:13] [INFO ] Transformed 163 places.
[2020-06-04 02:52:13] [INFO ] Transformed 148 transitions.
[2020-06-04 02:52:13] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 163 places and 148 transitions in 81 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 21 ms.
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 3341 resets, run finished after 231 ms. (steps per millisecond=432 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0]
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 163 cols
[2020-06-04 02:52:13] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 19 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 20 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 102 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 104 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 147/284/147 causal constraints in 11 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] Added : 133 causal constraints over 28 iterations in 373 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 86 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 159 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 91 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 53 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 40 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 40 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 7/6 trap constraints in 543 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 85 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 330 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 97 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 71 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 50 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 70 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 59 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 89 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:16] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 8/7 trap constraints in 874 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:16] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 147/284/147 causal constraints in 9 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:52:16] [INFO ] Added : 127 causal constraints over 26 iterations in 392 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 73 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 109 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 17 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 140 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 139 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 64 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 117 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 238 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:17] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 147/284/147 causal constraints in 9 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] Added : 143 causal constraints over 29 iterations in 574 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 68 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 58 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 265 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 142 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 21 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 124 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 28 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 112 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:18] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 147/284/147 causal constraints in 12 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:52:19] [INFO ] Added : 145 causal constraints over 29 iterations in 489 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:19] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 137 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:19] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:52:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 26 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 138 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 117 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 29 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 173 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 147/284/147 causal constraints in 11 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] Added : 143 causal constraints over 30 iterations in 410 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 111 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 90 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 103 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:20] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 147/284/147 causal constraints in 11 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] Added : 145 causal constraints over 29 iterations in 359 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 119 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 18 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 121 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 2 trap constraints in 149 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:21] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 133 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:22] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:52:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 25 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 139 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:22] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 100 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:22] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 147/284/147 causal constraints in 20 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:52:22] [INFO ] Added : 143 causal constraints over 29 iterations in 604 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 114 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 82 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 59 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 66 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 95 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 337 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 109 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 48 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 52 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 44 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 63 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 64 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 315 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 147/284/147 causal constraints in 7 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] Added : 143 causal constraints over 29 iterations in 320 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 68 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 86 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 92 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 86 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 62 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 72 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 149 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:24] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 147/284/147 causal constraints in 8 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] Added : 145 causal constraints over 30 iterations in 292 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 57 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 49 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 144 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 133 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 14 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 81 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 56 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 72 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 72 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 53 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 55 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 7/6 trap constraints in 415 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 147/284/147 causal constraints in 10 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Added : 143 causal constraints over 29 iterations in 323 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 45 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 75 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned unsat
Successfully simplified 18 atomic propositions for a total of 18 simplifications.
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 7 formulas.
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 7 formulas.
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Export to MCC properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.sr.xml took 2 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:52:26] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml took 5 ms.
info: Time: 3600 - MCC
vrfy: Checking CTLCardinality @ DoubleExponent-PT-003 @ 3570 seconds

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-003-CTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT
vrfy: finished
info: timeLeft: 3561
rslt: Output for CTLCardinality @ DoubleExponent-PT-003

{
"build":
{
"architecture": 64,
"assertions": false,
"build_hostname": "mcc2019",
"build_system": "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu",
"optimizations": true,
"package_version": "2.0",
"svn_version": "3189M"
},
"call":
{
"exec_host": "mcc2020",
"markinglimit": null,
"parameters":
[
"--pnmlnet",
"model.pnml",
"--xmlformula",
"--formula=CTLCardinality.xml",
"--mcc",
"--donotcomputecapacities",
"--encoder=simplecompressed",
"--check=modelchecking",
"--stubborn=tarjan",
"--stateequation=par",
"--quickchecks",
"--timelimit=3570",
"--localtimelimit=0",
"--preference=force_ctl",
"--json=CTLCardinality.json",
"--jsoninclude=formula,formulastat,net"
],
"starttime": "Thu Jun 4 02:52:27 2020
",
"timelimit": 3570
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 396
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 0,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 0,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 0,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "TRUE",
"processed_size": 4,
"rewrites": 23
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 0,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 445
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 0,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 0,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 0,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "TRUE",
"processed_size": 4,
"rewrites": 23
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 1,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 509
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p142 + 1 <= p17))",
"processed_size": 19,
"rewrites": 26
},
"result":
{
"edges": 2689,
"markings": 2690,
"produced_by": "state space /EXEF",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 2,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion"
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 1,
"problems": 1
},
"type": "invariance_from_all_successors",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 594
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 1,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 1,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "EG((AX((p15 <= p52)) AND NOT DEADLOCK))",
"processed_size": 39,
"rewrites": 25
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 109,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 3711,
"markings": 3712,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 3,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 713
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 3,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 3,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p110 + 1 <= p141) OR (p90 <= 0))",
"processed_size": 35,
"rewrites": 26
},
"result":
{
"edges": 28,
"markings": 29,
"produced_by": "state space / EG",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 4,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 11
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 2,
"problems": 2
},
"type": "eventual_occurrence",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 891
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 1,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 3,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 3,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "E (G ((((p145 <= 0) OR (p11 + 1 <= p23)))))",
"processed_size": 44,
"rewrites": 24
},
"result":
{
"edges": 28,
"markings": 29,
"produced_by": "state space / EG",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 5,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 11
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 2,
"problems": 2
},
"type": "possible_preservation",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1189
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 1,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 3,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 5,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 5,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "E (G (((p48 <= p99) OR ((p74 + 1 <= p145) AND (p70 <= 2)))))",
"processed_size": 61,
"rewrites": 24
},
"result":
{
"edges": 28,
"markings": 29,
"produced_by": "state space / EG",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 6,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 9
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 4,
"problems": 2
},
"type": "possible_preservation",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1783
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1783
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "(p22 <= 0)",
"processed_size": 10,
"rewrites": 23
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 7,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 3567
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p93 <= p76))",
"processed_size": 14,
"rewrites": 23
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 8,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": null
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 7,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 3567
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 1,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 4,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 4,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "G (((p36 <= p127) U (p161 <= p120)))",
"processed_size": 36,
"rewrites": 25
},
"result":
{
"edges": 2649747,
"markings": 2395576,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 3
},
"compoundnumber": 8,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl preserving/insertion"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "universal single path",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"child":
[

{
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "(p22 <= 0)",
"processed_size": 10,
"rewrites": 23
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 9,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p93 <= p76))",
"processed_size": 14,
"rewrites": 23
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 10,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "A (G ((p16 <= p2)))",
"processed_size": 19,
"rewrites": 25
},
"result":
{
"edges": 3408,
"markings": 3409,
"produced_by": "state space",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 11,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion"
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 1,
"problems": 1
},
"type": "invariance",
"workflow": "stateequation||search"
}
}
],
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 9,
"type": "boolean"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"error": null,
"memory": 22088,
"runtime": 9.000000,
"signal": null,
"timelimitreached": false
},
"files":
{
"formula": "CTLCardinality.xml",
"net": "model.pnml"
},
"formula":
{
"skeleton": "TRUE : E(G(*)) : A(G(A((** U **)))) : E(G(**)) : A(F(**)) : E(G((A(X(**)) AND NODEADLOCK))) : A(X(A(G(**)))) : TRUE : (** AND (A(G(**)) AND **))"
},
"net":
{
"arcs": 417,
"conflict_clusters": 109,
"places": 163,
"places_significant": 144,
"singleton_clusters": 0,
"transitions": 148
},
"result":
{
"preliminary_value": "yes yes yes yes no no no yes no ",
"value": "yes yes yes yes no no no yes no "
},
"task":
{
"type": "compound"
}
}
lola: LoLA will run for 3570 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: input: PNML file (--pnml)
lola: reading net from model.pnml
lola: reading pnml
lola: PNML file contains place/transition net
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml
lola: 311/268435456 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: Size of bit vector: 5216
lola: finding significant places
lola: 163 places, 148 transitions, 144 significant places
lola: compute conflict clusters
lola: computed conflict clusters
lola: Computing conflicting sets
lola: Computing back conflicting sets
lola: TASK
lola: Reading formula in XML format (--xmlformula)
lola: reading pnml
lola: reading formula from CTLCardinality.xml
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always false: (2 <= p104)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p26 <= p70)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always false: (3 <= p145)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always false: (3 <= p19)
lola: (NOT(A (F ((p60 + 1 <= p1)))) OR E (G ((0 <= 0)))) : NOT(A (F ((((1 <= p145) AND (p23 <= p11)))))) : A (G (A (((p36 <= p127) U (p161 <= p120))))) : E (G (((p48 <= p99) OR ((p74 + 1 <= p145) AND (p70 <= 2))))) : A (((0 <= 0) U ((p141 <= p110) AND (1 <= p90)))) : E (G ((A (X ((p15 <= p52))) AND E (X ((0 <= 0)))))) : A (G (A (X (((p17 <= p142)))))) : E (G ((0 <= 0))) : (A ((((p94 <= p40)) U (1 <= 0))) OR (((p22 <= 0) AND A (G ((p16 <= p2)))) AND ((p93 <= p76))))
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:323
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:100
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:160
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:148
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:123
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:323
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:100
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:169
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:100
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:130
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:398
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:100
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:160
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:148
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:98
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:180
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:151
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:122
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 396 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: TRUE
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: TRUE
lola: processed formula length: 4
lola: 23 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: processed formula with 0 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 445 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: TRUE
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: TRUE
lola: processed formula length: 4
lola: 23 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: processed formula with 0 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 509 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (X (A (G (((p17 <= p142))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance from all successors
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:624
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:753
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: processed formula: ((p142 + 1 <= p17))
lola: processed formula length: 19
lola: 26 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space /EXEF)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (EXef version) (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((p142 + 1 <= p17))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to CTLCardinality-2-0.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file CTLCardinality-2-0.sara.
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space /EXEF
lola: The predicate is not invariant from successors.
lola: 2690 markings, 2689 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 594 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (G ((A (X ((p15 <= p52))) AND NOT DEADLOCK)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:812
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:808
lola: processed formula: EG((AX((p15 <= p52)) AND NOT DEADLOCK))
lola: processed formula length: 39
lola: 25 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 1 significant temporal operators and needs 5 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula.
lola: 3712 markings, 3711 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 713 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (F (((p141 <= p110) AND (1 <= p90))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking eventual occurrence
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:584
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:749
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: processed formula: ((p110 + 1 <= p141) OR (p90 <= 0))
lola: processed formula length: 35
lola: 26 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space / EG)
lola: state space: using search routine for EG formula (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using EG preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:700
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((p141 <= p110) AND (1 <= p90))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space / EG
lola: The predicate does not eventually occur.
lola: 29 markings, 28 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 891 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (G ((((p145 <= 0) OR (p11 + 1 <= p23)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking possible preservation
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:583
lola: processed formula: E (G ((((p145 <= 0) OR (p11 + 1 <= p23)))))
lola: processed formula length: 44
lola: 24 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space / EG)
lola: state space: using search routine for EG formula (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using EG preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space / EG
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: (((1 <= p145) AND (p23 <= p11)))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: The predicate is possibly preserved.
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: 29 markings, 28 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 1189 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (G (((p48 <= p99) OR ((p74 + 1 <= p145) AND (p70 <= 2)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking possible preservation
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:583
lola: processed formula: E (G (((p48 <= p99) OR ((p74 + 1 <= p145) AND (p70 <= 2)))))
lola: processed formula length: 61
lola: 24 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space / EG)
lola: state space: using search routine for EG formula (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using EG preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((p99 + 1 <= p48) AND ((p145 <= p74) OR (3 <= p70)))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space / EG
lola: The predicate is possibly preserved.
lola: 29 markings, 28 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 1783 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((p22 <= 0) AND (A (G ((p16 <= p2))) AND ((p93 <= p76))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 1783 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (p22 <= 0)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: (p22 <= 0)
lola: processed formula length: 10
lola: 23 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: processed formula with 1 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 3567 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((p93 <= p76))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: ((p93 <= p76))
lola: processed formula length: 14
lola: 23 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: processed formula with 1 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: Child process aborted or communication problem between parent and child process
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: unknown
lola: The Boolean predicate may be true or false.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 3567 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (A (((p36 <= p127) U (p161 <= p120)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a universal CTL formula with single counterexample path (use LTL...)
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:679
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:679
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: G (((p36 <= p127) U (p161 <= p120)))
lola: processed formula length: 36
lola: 25 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 3 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm(--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: 2194717 markings, 2426892 edges, 438943 markings/sec, 0 secs
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The universal single path CTL formula holds.
lola: 2395576 markings, 2649747 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((p22 <= 0) AND (A (G ((p16 <= p2))) AND ((p93 <= p76))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (p22 <= 0)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: (p22 <= 0)
lola: processed formula length: 10
lola: 23 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: processed formula with 1 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((p93 <= p76))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: ((p93 <= p76))
lola: processed formula length: 14
lola: 23 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: processed formula with 1 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((p16 <= p2)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: processed formula: A (G ((p16 <= p2)))
lola: processed formula length: 19
lola: 25 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLCardinality.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: (p2 + 1 <= p16)
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to CTLCardinality-11-0.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file CTLCardinality-11-0.sara.
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 3409 markings, 3408 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The Boolean predicate is false.
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: yes yes yes yes no no no yes no
lola:
preliminary result: yes yes yes yes no no no yes no
lola: memory consumption: 22088 KB
lola: time consumption: 9 seconds
lola: print data as JSON (--json)
lola: writing JSON to CTLCardinality.json
lola: closed JSON file CTLCardinality.json
rslt: finished

--------------------
content from stderr:

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DoubleExponent-PT-003"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itslola"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itslola"
echo " Input is DoubleExponent-PT-003, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r178-tajo-158987882800763"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DoubleExponent-PT-003.tgz
mv DoubleExponent-PT-003 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;