fond
Model Checking Contest 2020
10th edition, Paris, France, June 23, 2020
Execution of r178-tajo-158987882800754
Last Updated
Jun 28, 2020

About the Execution of ITS-LoLa for DoubleExponent-PT-002

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
15739.940 3600000.00 18940.00 48.30 FTTTTTFFTTTFFFTT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.r178-tajo-158987882800754.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itslola
Input is DoubleExponent-PT-002, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r178-tajo-158987882800754
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 212K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K Mar 31 07:41 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Mar 31 07:41 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Mar 30 00:27 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Mar 30 00:27 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Mar 24 05:37 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K Mar 24 05:37 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.8K Apr 8 14:52 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Apr 28 14:00 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 8 14:52 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 28 14:00 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Mar 28 14:45 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Mar 28 14:45 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K Mar 27 07:46 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Mar 27 07:46 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Mar 28 14:50 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Mar 28 14:50 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 24 05:37 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 Mar 24 05:37 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 24 05:37 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K Mar 24 05:37 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-00
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-01
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-02
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-03
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-04
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-05
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-06
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-07
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-08
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-09
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-10
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-11
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-12
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-13
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-14
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1591239066777

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -timeout, 3600, -rebuildPNML]
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 34 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] Transformed 110 places.
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] Transformed 98 transitions.
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 110 places and 98 transitions in 69 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 16 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 3295 resets, run finished after 149 ms. (steps per millisecond=671 ) properties seen :[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 110 cols
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 7 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 69 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 26 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 256 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 50 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 26 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 27 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 186 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 97/187/97 causal constraints in 8 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Added : 95 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 146 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 50 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 37 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 31 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 27 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 115 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 55 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 34 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 26 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 73 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 97/187/97 causal constraints in 8 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Added : 95 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 156 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 72 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 29 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 64 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 45 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 92 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 97/187/97 causal constraints in 7 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Added : 93 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 181 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 62 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 35 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 49 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 96 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 97/187/97 causal constraints in 6 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:51:10] [INFO ] Added : 93 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 183 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 52 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 27 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 119 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 23 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 76 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 46 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 93 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 97/187/97 causal constraints in 6 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Added : 81 causal constraints over 17 iterations in 165 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 74 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 97/187/97 causal constraints in 7 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 24 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 90 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 32 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 43 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 97/187/97 causal constraints in 6 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Added : 87 causal constraints over 18 iterations in 158 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 46 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 62 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 23 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 62 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 63 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 25 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 61 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 97/187/97 causal constraints in 5 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Added : 93 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 146 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 50 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 33 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 33 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 33 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 165 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 60 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 31 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 30 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 28 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 27 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 185 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 97/187/97 causal constraints in 6 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Added : 95 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 122 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 47 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 35 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 49 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 49 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 97/187/97 causal constraints in 5 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Added : 95 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 158 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 53 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 20 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 27 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 47 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 38 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:13] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 97/187/97 causal constraints in 5 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:51:14] [INFO ] Added : 94 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 123 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 02:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 34 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:14] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 46 ms
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 2 simplifications.
[2020-06-04 02:51:14] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 4 formulas.
[2020-06-04 02:51:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2020-06-04 02:51:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2020-06-04 02:51:14] [INFO ] Export to MCC properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.sr.xml took 2 ms.
[2020-06-04 02:51:14] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml took 1 ms.
info: Time: 3600 - MCC
vrfy: Checking LTLFireability @ DoubleExponent-PT-002 @ 3570 seconds

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT
vrfy: finished
info: timeLeft: 3567
rslt: Output for LTLFireability @ DoubleExponent-PT-002

{
"build":
{
"architecture": 64,
"assertions": false,
"build_hostname": "mcc2019",
"build_system": "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu",
"optimizations": true,
"package_version": "2.0",
"svn_version": "3189M"
},
"call":
{
"exec_host": "mcc2020",
"markinglimit": null,
"parameters":
[
"--pnmlnet",
"model.pnml",
"--xmlformula",
"--formula=LTLFireability.xml",
"--mcc",
"--donotcomputecapacities",
"--encoder=simplecompressed",
"--check=modelchecking",
"--stubborn=deletion",
"--stateequation=par",
"--timelimit=3570",
"--localtimelimit=0",
"--preference=force_ltl",
"--json=LTLFireability.json",
"--jsoninclude=formula,formulastat,net"
],
"starttime": "Thu Jun 4 02:51:14 2020
",
"timelimit": 3570
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 297
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 2,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 1,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X ((X (F ((1 <= p22))) OR G ((p43 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 42,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 70,
"markings": 67,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 4
},
"compoundnumber": 0,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 324
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 324
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((1 <= p65) AND (1 <= p86))",
"processed_size": 27,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 1,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 356
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "(1 <= p43)",
"processed_size": 10,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 2,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 396
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "(p43 <= 0)",
"processed_size": 10,
"rewrites": 121
},
"result":
{
"edges": 22,
"markings": 23,
"produced_by": "state space / EG",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 3,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 3
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"type": "eventual_occurrence"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 445
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X (F (((p65 <= 0) OR (p86 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 35,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 1,
"markings": 2,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 2
},
"compoundnumber": 4,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 1,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 356
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 3,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 4,
"comp": 7,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 7,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 3,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 5,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "G (((G (((1 <= p16) AND (1 <= p88))) R (G ((p95 <= 0)) OR X (F (((p40 <= 0) OR (p60 <= 0)))))) OR ((p40 <= 0) OR (p60 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 127,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 49121,
"markings": 25695,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 12
},
"compoundnumber": 2,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 396
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X (F ((1 <= p24)))",
"processed_size": 18,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 14,
"markings": 15,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 2
},
"compoundnumber": 3,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 445
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 4,
"aconj": 3,
"adisj": 2,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 7,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 7,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 5,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X ((X (X (X ((((p9 <= 0) OR (p92 <= 0)) AND (p82 <= 0))))) R (((p9 <= 0) OR (p92 <= 0)) AND ((p1 <= 0) OR (p109 <= 0)))))",
"processed_size": 124,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 4,
"markings": 5,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 9
},
"compoundnumber": 4,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 509
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 509
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "(1 <= p59)",
"processed_size": 10,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 5,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 594
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 1,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 1,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 1,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X (F ((p52 <= 0)))",
"processed_size": 18,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 1,
"markings": 2,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 2
},
"compoundnumber": 6,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 5,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 594
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 2,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 4,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 4,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 1,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X ((X (F (((p12 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0)))) AND ((p12 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 73,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 3,
"markings": 4,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 5
},
"compoundnumber": 6,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 713
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X (G (((1 <= p104) OR (1 <= p19))))",
"processed_size": 36,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 25,
"markings": 25,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 3
},
"compoundnumber": 7,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 891
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 4,
"G": 4,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 5,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 3,
"comp": 10,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 10,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 2,
"tdisj": 2,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 4,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "G ((X (F (((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p51)))) AND (F ((((p15 <= 0) OR (p51 <= 0)) AND (F (G (((p27 <= 0) OR (p54 <= 0)))) OR G (((p15 <= 0) OR (p51 <= 0)))))) OR G (F (((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p51)))))))",
"processed_size": 197,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 25,
"markings": 25,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 12
},
"compoundnumber": 8,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1189
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 2,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 2,
"comp": 3,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 3,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 1,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 3,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "X (X ((G ((p19 <= 0)) OR F (((p9 <= 0) OR (p105 <= 0))))))",
"processed_size": 59,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 2,
"markings": 3,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 4
},
"compoundnumber": 9,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "no (formula contains X operator)"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1783
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 2,
"G": 2,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 3,
"comp": 7,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 7,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 1,
"tdisj": 3,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 5,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "F (G ((F ((G (((p6 <= 0) OR (p41 <= 0))) OR ((p20 <= 0) AND ((p6 <= 0) OR (p41 <= 0))))) OR ((p79 <= 0) OR (p98 <= 0)))))",
"processed_size": 123,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 4103,
"markings": 3708,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 5
},
"compoundnumber": 10,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl preserving/insertion"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 3567
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 1,
"G": 3,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 4,
"comp": 5,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 5,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 1,
"tdisj": 2,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 5,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "F (G ((G ((G (((p76 <= 0) OR (p85 <= 0))) OR ((p63 <= 0) OR (p90 <= 0)))) AND (1 <= p81))))",
"processed_size": 92,
"rewrites": 119
},
"result":
{
"edges": 28,
"markings": 26,
"produced_by": "LTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"buchi":
{
"states": 7
},
"compoundnumber": 11,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ltl preserving/insertion"
},
"type": "product automaton/dfs"
},
"type": "LTL",
"workflow": "product automaton"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"error": null,
"memory": 26032,
"runtime": 3.000000,
"signal": null,
"timelimitreached": false
},
"files":
{
"formula": "LTLFireability.xml",
"net": "model.pnml"
},
"formula":
{
"skeleton": "X((X(F(**)) OR G(*))) : (X(F(*)) OR (** OR ((G(*) AND F(**)) OR **))) : F(G((F((G(*) OR (* AND *))) OR (** OR **)))) : G(((G(**) R (G(*) OR X(F(*)))) OR (* OR *))) : X(F(**)) : F(G((G((G(*) OR (* OR *))) AND *))) : X((X(X(X(**))) R *)) : (X(F(**)) OR **) : X((X(F(*)) AND **)) : X(G(**)) : G((X(F(**)) AND (F((* AND (F(G(*)) OR G(*)))) OR G(F(**))))) : X(X((G(*) OR F(*))))"
},
"net":
{
"arcs": 276,
"conflict_clusters": 75,
"places": 110,
"places_significant": 96,
"singleton_clusters": 0,
"transitions": 98
},
"result":
{
"preliminary_value": "no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes no no yes ",
"value": "no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes no no yes "
},
"task":
{
"type": "compound"
}
}
lola: LoLA will run for 3570 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: input: PNML file (--pnml)
lola: reading net from model.pnml
lola: reading pnml
lola: PNML file contains place/transition net
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml
lola: 208/268435456 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: Size of bit vector: 3520
lola: finding significant places
lola: 110 places, 98 transitions, 96 significant places
lola: compute conflict clusters
lola: computed conflict clusters
lola: Computing conflicting sets
lola: Computing back conflicting sets
lola: TASK
lola: Reading formula in XML format (--xmlformula)
lola: reading pnml
lola: reading formula from LTLFireability.xml
lola: NOT(X ((X (NOT(F ((1 <= p22)))) AND F ((1 <= p43))))) : ((F (NOT(X (((1 <= p65) AND (1 <= p86))))) OR (NOT(F ((1 <= p87))) U (1 <= p43))) OR ((1 <= p65) AND (1 <= p86))) : F (G (((NOT(G (((1 <= p20) U ((1 <= p6) AND (1 <= p41))))) OR (p79 <= 0)) OR (p98 <= 0)))) : NOT(F ((((NOT(G (((1 <= p16) AND (1 <= p88)))) U (F ((1 <= p95)) AND X (G (((1 <= p40) AND (1 <= p60)))))) AND (1 <= p40)) AND (1 <= p60)))) : NOT(G (((1 <= 0) U NOT(F (X ((1 <= p24))))))) : NOT(F (G (F ((F (((F (((1 <= p76) AND (1 <= p85))) AND (1 <= p63)) AND (1 <= p90))) OR (p81 <= 0)))))) : NOT(X ((NOT(X (X (X ((((p9 <= 0) OR (p92 <= 0)) AND (p82 <= 0)))))) U (((1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p92)) OR ((1 <= p1) AND (1 <= p109)))))) : (X (F ((G (X (((1 <= p61) AND (1 <= p96)))) U (p52 <= 0)))) OR (1 <= p59)) : X ((X (NOT(G (((1 <= p12) AND (1 <= p35))))) AND ((p12 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0)))) : G (X (((1 <= p104) OR (1 <= p19)))) : NOT(F ((G ((G (F (((1 <= p27) AND (1 <= p54)))) U ((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p51)))) U NOT(F (X (((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p51)))))))) : NOT(X ((F (X ((1 <= p19))) AND X (G (((1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p105)))))))
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:315
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:300
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:431
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:254
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:254
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:437
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:522
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:315
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:318
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:254
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:315
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:338
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:300
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:315
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:315
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:98
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:185
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:353
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:350
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:300
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:371
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:318
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:315
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:315
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:338
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:300
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:353
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:434
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:353
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:431
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:431
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:380
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:318
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:300
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:315
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:318
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:315
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:300
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:356
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:525
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:335
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:315
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 297 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X ((X (F ((1 <= p22))) OR G ((p43 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X ((X (F ((1 <= p22))) OR G ((p43 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 42
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 4 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 67 markings, 70 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 324 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (X (F (((p65 <= 0) OR (p86 <= 0)))) OR ((1 <= p43) OR ((G ((p87 <= 0)) AND F ((1 <= p43))) OR ((1 <= p65) AND (1 <= p86)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 324 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((1 <= p65) AND (1 <= p86))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: ((1 <= p65) AND (1 <= p86))
lola: processed formula length: 27
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: processed formula with 2 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net violates the given property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 356 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (1 <= p43)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: (1 <= p43)
lola: processed formula length: 10
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: processed formula with 1 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net violates the given property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 396 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: F ((1 <= p43))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking eventual occurrence
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:750
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: processed formula: (p43 <= 0)
lola: processed formula length: 10
lola: 121 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space / EG)
lola: state space: using search routine for EG formula (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using EG preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space / EG
lola: The predicate does not eventually occur.
lola: 23 markings, 22 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 445 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X (F (((p65 <= 0) OR (p86 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X (F (((p65 <= 0) OR (p86 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 35
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 2 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula (language of the product automaton is empty).
lola: 2 markings, 1 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: The Boolean predicate is true.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 356 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: G (((G (((1 <= p16) AND (1 <= p88))) R (G ((p95 <= 0)) OR X (F (((p40 <= 0) OR (p60 <= 0)))))) OR ((p40 <= 0) OR (p60 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: G (((G (((1 <= p16) AND (1 <= p88))) R (G ((p95 <= 0)) OR X (F (((p40 <= 0) OR (p60 <= 0)))))) OR ((p40 <= 0) OR (p60 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 127
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 12 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula (language of the product automaton is empty).
lola: 25695 markings, 49121 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 396 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X (F ((1 <= p24)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X (F ((1 <= p24)))
lola: processed formula length: 18
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 2 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula (language of the product automaton is empty).
lola: 15 markings, 14 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 445 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X ((X (X (X ((((p9 <= 0) OR (p92 <= 0)) AND (p82 <= 0))))) R (((p9 <= 0) OR (p92 <= 0)) AND ((p1 <= 0) OR (p109 <= 0)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X ((X (X (X ((((p9 <= 0) OR (p92 <= 0)) AND (p82 <= 0))))) R (((p9 <= 0) OR (p92 <= 0)) AND ((p1 <= 0) OR (p109 <= 0)))))
lola: processed formula length: 124
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 9 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula (language of the product automaton is empty).
lola: 5 markings, 4 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 509 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (X (F ((p52 <= 0))) OR (1 <= p59))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 509 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (1 <= p59)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: (1 <= p59)
lola: processed formula length: 10
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: processed formula with 1 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net violates the given property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 594 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X (F ((p52 <= 0)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X (F ((p52 <= 0)))
lola: processed formula length: 18
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 2 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula (language of the product automaton is empty).
lola: 2 markings, 1 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: The Boolean predicate is true.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 594 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X ((X (F (((p12 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0)))) AND ((p12 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X ((X (F (((p12 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0)))) AND ((p12 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 73
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 5 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula (language of the product automaton is empty).
lola: 4 markings, 3 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 713 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X (G (((1 <= p104) OR (1 <= p19))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X (G (((1 <= p104) OR (1 <= p19))))
lola: processed formula length: 36
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 3 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 25 markings, 25 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 891 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: G ((X (F (((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p51)))) AND (F ((((p15 <= 0) OR (p51 <= 0)) AND (F (G (((p27 <= 0) OR (p54 <= 0)))) OR G (((p15 <= 0) OR (p51 <= 0)))))) OR G (F (((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p51)))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: G ((X (F (((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p51)))) AND (F ((((p15 <= 0) OR (p51 <= 0)) AND (F (G (((p27 <= 0) OR (p54 <= 0)))) OR G (((p15 <= 0) OR (p51 <= 0)))))) OR G (F (((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p51)))))))
lola: processed formula length: 197
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 12 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 25 markings, 25 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 1189 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: X (X ((G ((p19 <= 0)) OR F (((p9 <= 0) OR (p105 <= 0))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: X (X ((G ((p19 <= 0)) OR F (((p9 <= 0) OR (p105 <= 0))))))
lola: processed formula length: 59
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 4 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: Formula contains X operator; stubborn sets not applicable
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula (language of the product automaton is empty).
lola: 3 markings, 2 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 1783 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: F (G ((F ((G (((p6 <= 0) OR (p41 <= 0))) OR ((p20 <= 0) AND ((p6 <= 0) OR (p41 <= 0))))) OR ((p79 <= 0) OR (p98 <= 0)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: F (G ((F ((G (((p6 <= 0) OR (p41 <= 0))) OR ((p20 <= 0) AND ((p6 <= 0) OR (p41 <= 0))))) OR ((p79 <= 0) OR (p98 <= 0)))))
lola: processed formula length: 123
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 5 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with deletion algorithm (--stubborn=deletion)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm(--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula (language of the product automaton is empty).
lola: 3708 markings, 4103 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 3567 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: F (G ((G ((G (((p76 <= 0) OR (p85 <= 0))) OR ((p63 <= 0) OR (p90 <= 0)))) AND (1 <= p81))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking LTL
lola: transforming LTL-Formula into a Büchi-Automaton
lola: processed formula: F (G ((G ((G (((p76 <= 0) OR (p85 <= 0))) OR ((p63 <= 0) OR (p90 <= 0)))) AND (1 <= p81))))
lola: processed formula length: 92
lola: 119 rewrites
lola: closed formula file LTLFireability.xml
lola: the resulting Büchi automaton has 7 states
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with deletion algorithm (--stubborn=deletion)
lola: using ltl preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm(--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: SEARCH
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: LTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula (language of the product automaton is nonempty).
lola: 26 markings, 28 edges
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes no no yes
lola:
preliminary result: no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes no no yes
lola: ========================================
lola: memory consumption: 26032 KB
lola: time consumption: 3 seconds
lola: print data as JSON (--json)
lola: writing JSON to LTLFireability.json
lola: closed JSON file LTLFireability.json
rslt: finished

--------------------
content from stderr:

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DoubleExponent-PT-002"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itslola"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itslola"
echo " Input is DoubleExponent-PT-002, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r178-tajo-158987882800754"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DoubleExponent-PT-002.tgz
mv DoubleExponent-PT-002 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;