fond
Model Checking Contest 2020
10th edition, Paris, France, June 23, 2020
Execution of r111-csrt-158961258000708
Last Updated
Jun 28, 2020

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for Peterson-PT-2

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
15745.360 61897.00 108313.00 182.00 TTTFTFTFFTTFFFTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/local/x2003239/mcc2020-input.r111-csrt-158961258000708.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/local/x2003239/mcc2020-input.qcow2 encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is Peterson-PT-2, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r111-csrt-158961258000708
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 408K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K Apr 27 15:14 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 27 15:14 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K Apr 27 15:14 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 32K Apr 27 15:14 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 27 15:14 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K Apr 27 15:14 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 27 15:14 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K Apr 28 14:01 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K Apr 27 15:14 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K Apr 28 14:01 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 27 15:14 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K Apr 27 15:14 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K Apr 27 15:14 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K Apr 27 15:14 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.7K Apr 27 15:14 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K Apr 27 15:14 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 Apr 27 15:14 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 Apr 27 15:14 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Apr 27 15:14 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K Apr 27 15:14 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1590022890399

[2020-05-21 01:01:33] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsminpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2020-05-21 01:01:33] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2020-05-21 01:01:33] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 61 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:33] [INFO ] Transformed 102 places.
[2020-05-21 01:01:33] [INFO ] Transformed 126 transitions.
[2020-05-21 01:01:33] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 102 places and 126 transitions in 118 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 25 ms.
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 0 resets, run finished after 381 ms. (steps per millisecond=262 ) properties seen :[0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1]
[2020-05-21 01:01:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 102 cols
[2020-05-21 01:01:34] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 11 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 54 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:34] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 161 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2020-05-21 01:01:34] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 38 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:35] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:01:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 23 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 217 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 13 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 1112 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 142 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 204 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:37] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 7/6 trap constraints in 1783 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:37] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 9 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:01:37] [INFO ] Added : 111 causal constraints over 23 iterations in 536 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 53 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 24 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:37] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:38] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 271 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:38] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:38] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:01:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 18 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 265 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:38] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 36 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:01:39] [INFO ] Added : 117 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 516 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 561 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 202 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:39] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 838 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:39] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:40] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 309 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:40] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:40] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:01:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 162 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 9 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 23 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:40] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 52 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:40] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 27 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] Added : 115 causal constraints over 23 iterations in 640 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 256 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 208 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 12 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:41] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 17 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:01:42] [INFO ] Added : 117 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 413 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 156 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:42] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 343 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:42] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 313 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:42] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:42] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:01:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 36 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 112 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:43] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 17 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:01:43] [INFO ] Added : 110 causal constraints over 23 iterations in 510 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 522 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 1066 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 1628 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 107 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 69 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 71 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 96 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:45] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 10 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:01:46] [INFO ] Added : 108 causal constraints over 22 iterations in 555 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 1232 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 717 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 838 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 2996 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 69 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 120 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 281 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 299 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:49] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 24 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] Added : 117 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 477 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 236 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 265 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 56 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 109 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 26 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:51] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 68 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:51] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 23 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:01:51] [INFO ] Added : 109 causal constraints over 22 iterations in 409 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 1035 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 1075 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 26 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 118 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 9 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 33 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 125 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 36 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:01:53] [INFO ] Added : 117 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 609 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 320 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 346 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:54] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 812 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 49 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 21 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:54] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 97 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:54] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:54] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:01:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 29 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 400 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 864 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 334 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:56] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 1323 ms
[2020-05-21 01:01:56] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 15 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:01:57] [INFO ] Added : 117 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 619 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 28 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 20 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:57] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 422 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:57] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 18 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:57] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:01:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 32 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:01:58] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 353 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:58] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 31 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:58] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 6 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:01:58] [INFO ] Added : 116 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 288 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 1110 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 710 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 1858 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 135 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 20 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 175 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 21 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 66 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:00] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 14 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:01] [INFO ] Added : 117 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 565 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 29 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:01] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 67 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 17 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:01] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 152 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:01] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:01] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 30 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 222 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 143 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 128 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 331 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:02] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 685 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:02] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 39 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:03] [INFO ] Added : 110 causal constraints over 22 iterations in 325 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 717 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 1330 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 137 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 2284 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 210 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 197 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 309 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 288 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 265 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:06] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 1026 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:06] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 13 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:07] [INFO ] Added : 89 causal constraints over 18 iterations in 284 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 50 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 23 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:07] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 796 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:08] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 31 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:08] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 64 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 31 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 696 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 29 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 202 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:09] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 322 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 29 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:10] [INFO ] Added : 115 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 911 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 36 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 24 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:10] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 313 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:10] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:10] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 536 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 28 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:12] [INFO ] Added : 117 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 566 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 305 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 825 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 1266 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned unsat
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 296 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 72 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 96 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 53 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:13] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 6 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:14] [INFO ] Added : 117 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 335 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned unsat
[2020-05-21 01:02:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:14] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 374 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:14] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 12 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:14] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 60 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 110 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 86 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 146 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 7 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] Added : 110 causal constraints over 22 iterations in 244 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 181 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 105 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 82 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:15] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 35 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:16] [INFO ] Added : 108 causal constraints over 22 iterations in 311 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 373 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 259 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 174 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 991 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 128 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 27 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 24 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 404 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 179 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 94 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:18] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 314 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:18] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 23 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:18] [INFO ] Added : 117 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 669 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 20 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:18] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 367 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:19] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:19] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 27 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 123 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 67 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 321 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 189 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:20] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 689 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:20] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 20 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:20] [INFO ] Added : 112 causal constraints over 23 iterations in 368 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 34 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:20] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 110 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:20] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:20] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 92 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 42 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 288 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 775 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 464 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:22] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 1289 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:22] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 22 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:22] [INFO ] Added : 110 causal constraints over 22 iterations in 307 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 36 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 22 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:23] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 451 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:23] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 13 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:23] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 125 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 661 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 408 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:24] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 1113 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:24] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 17 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:25] [INFO ] Added : 105 causal constraints over 21 iterations in 475 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 577 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:25] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 606 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 24 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:26] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 116 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:26] [INFO ] [Real]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:26] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-21 01:02:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 25 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-21 01:02:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 719 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 26 Read/Feed constraints in 9 ms returned sat
[2020-05-21 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 138 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 467 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 579 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:28] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 1375 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:28] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 123/264/117 causal constraints in 12 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:28] [INFO ] Added : 117 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 505 ms. Result :sat
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 2 simplifications.
[2020-05-21 01:02:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 124 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2020-05-21 01:02:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/convert-linux64, -i, /tmp/graph17974048801189373889.txt, -o, /tmp/graph17974048801189373889.bin, -w, /tmp/graph17974048801189373889.weights], workingDir=null]
Built communities with : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/louvain-linux64, /tmp/graph17974048801189373889.bin, -l, -1, -v, -w, /tmp/graph17974048801189373889.weights, -q, 0, -e, 0.001], workingDir=null]
[2020-05-21 01:02:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2020-05-21 01:02:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2020-05-21 01:02:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 76 redundant transitions.
[2020-05-21 01:02:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 73 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2020-05-21 01:02:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal : 11 ms
[2020-05-21 01:02:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, --quiet, -i, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -ctl, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -ctl /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 16 CTL formulae.
built 29 ordering constraints for composite.
built 12 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 14 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 12 ordering constraints for composite.
built 11 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20754,0.074126,6384,348,25,3771,174,384,4728,49,404,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i5.i1.u8.CS_2>=1))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i7.u33.CS_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i1.u34.CS_1>=1)))&&(((((((((((((i0.i1.u22.TestTurn_2_0>=1)&&(i4.i1.u21.Turn_0_1>=1))||((i5.i1.u8.TestTurn_2_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_0>=1)))||((i4.i1.u21.TestTurn_1_0>=1)&&(i0.i1.u22.Turn_0_2>=1)))||((i7.u33.TestTurn_0_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_1>=1)))||((i0.i1.u22.TestTurn_2_0>=1)&&(i6.u18.Turn_0_0>=1)))||((i1.u9.TestTurn_1_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_0>=1)))||((i4.i1.u21.TestTurn_1_0>=1)&&(i6.u18.Turn_0_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u8.TestTurn_2_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_1>=1)))||((i6.u18.TestTurn_0_0>=1)&&(i4.i1.u21.Turn_0_1>=1)))||((i6.u18.TestTurn_0_0>=1)&&(i0.i1.u22.Turn_0_2>=1)))||((i1.u9.TestTurn_1_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_2>=1)))||((i7.u33.TestTurn_0_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_2>=1))))) + (EG((((i1.u34.EndTurn_1_1>=1)||(i7.u33.EndTurn_0_1>=1))||(i5.i1.u8.EndTurn_2_1>=1))) * ((((((i5.i1.u27.TestIdentity_2_1_2>=1)||(i0.i0.u4.TestIdentity_2_0_2>=1))||(i4.i0.u3.TestIdentity_1_0_1>=1))||(i2.u10.TestIdentity_0_1_0>=1))||(i3.u13.TestIdentity_1_1_1>=1))||(i6.u0.TestIdentity_0_0_0>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i5.i1.u8.CS_2>=1))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i7.u33.CS_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i1.u34.CS_1>=1)))&&(((((((((((((i0.i1.u22.TestTurn_2_0>=1)&&(i4.i1.u21.Turn_0_1>=1))||((i5.i1.u8.TestTurn_2_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_0>=1)))||((i4.i1.u21.TestTurn_1_0>=1)&&(i0.i1.u22.Turn_0_2>=1)))||((i7.u33.TestTurn_0_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_1>=1)))||((i0.i1.u22.TestTurn_2_0>=1)&&(i6.u18.Turn_0_0>=1)))||((i1.u9.TestTurn_1_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_0>=1)))||((i4.i1.u21.TestTurn_1_0>=1)&&(i6.u18.Turn_0_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u8.TestTurn_2_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_1>=1)))||((i6.u18.TestTurn_0_0>=1)&&(i4.i1.u21.Turn_0_1>=1)))||((i6.u18.TestTurn_0_0>=1)&&(i0.i1.u22.Turn_0_2>=1)))||((i1.u9.TestTurn_1_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_2>=1)))||((i7.u33.TestTurn_0_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_2>=1)))))] != FALSE + [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((((((i5.i1.u27.TestIdentity_2_1_2>=1)||(i0.i0.u4.TestIdentity_2_0_2>=1))||(i4.i0.u3.TestIdentity_1_0_1>=1))||(i2.u10.TestIdentity_0_1_0>=1))||(i3.u13.TestIdentity_1_1_1>=1))||(i6.u0.TestIdentity_0_0_0>=1))),(((i1.u34.EndTurn_1_1>=1)||(i7.u33.EndTurn_0_1>=1))||(i5.i1.u8.EndTurn_2_1>=1)))] != FALSE)
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,1,0.112131,7092,1,0,4574,182,1245,7177,171,430,12520
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EG((((((((((((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T<1)||(i4.i0.u14.TestAlone_1_0_2<1))&&((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T<1)||(i0.i1.u17.TestAlone_2_0_0<1)))&&((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T<1)||(i3.u19.TestAlone_1_1_2<1)))&&((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T<1)||(i2.u12.TestAlone_0_1_2<1)))&&((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T<1)||(i0.i1.u23.TestAlone_2_0_1<1)))&&((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T<1)||(i2.u24.TestAlone_0_1_1<1)))&&((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T<1)||(i5.i0.u29.TestAlone_2_1_1<1)))&&((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T<1)||(i6.u28.TestAlone_0_0_2<1)))&&((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T<1)||(i4.i1.u20.TestAlone_1_0_0<1)))&&((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T<1)||(i5.i1.u25.TestAlone_2_1_0<1)))&&((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T<1)||(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1<1)))&&((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T<1)||(i1.u9.TestAlone_1_1_0<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((((((((((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T<1)||(i4.i0.u14.TestAlone_1_0_2<1))&&((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T<1)||(i0.i1.u17.TestAlone_2_0_0<1)))&&((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T<1)||(i3.u19.TestAlone_1_1_2<1)))&&((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T<1)||(i2.u12.TestAlone_0_1_2<1)))&&((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T<1)||(i0.i1.u23.TestAlone_2_0_1<1)))&&((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T<1)||(i2.u24.TestAlone_0_1_1<1)))&&((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T<1)||(i5.i0.u29.TestAlone_2_1_1<1)))&&((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T<1)||(i6.u28.TestAlone_0_0_2<1)))&&((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T<1)||(i4.i1.u20.TestAlone_1_0_0<1)))&&((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T<1)||(i5.i1.u25.TestAlone_2_1_0<1)))&&((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T<1)||(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1<1)))&&((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T<1)||(i1.u9.TestAlone_1_1_0<1))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 1,1,0.623353,27684,1,0,48655,211,1327,69064,176,598,106922
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AG(EF(((((((((((((i6.u28.TestIdentity_0_0_2>=1)||(i0.i1.u17.TestIdentity_2_0_0>=1))||(i5.i0.u29.TestIdentity_2_1_1>=1))||(i4.i0.u14.TestIdentity_1_0_2>=1))||(i2.u24.TestIdentity_0_1_1>=1))||(i0.i1.u23.TestIdentity_2_0_1>=1))||(i5.i1.u25.TestIdentity_2_1_0>=1))||(i1.u9.TestIdentity_1_1_0>=1))||(i3.u19.TestIdentity_1_1_2>=1))||(i6.u26.TestIdentity_0_0_1>=1))||(i4.i1.u20.TestIdentity_1_0_0>=1))||(i2.u12.TestIdentity_0_1_2>=1)))) + E((((((((((((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i4.i0.u14.TestAlone_1_0_2>=1))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i3.u19.TestAlone_1_1_2>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i2.u12.TestAlone_0_1_2>=1)))||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i5.i1.u25.TestAlone_2_1_0>=1)))||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i1.u9.TestAlone_1_1_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i5.i0.u29.TestAlone_2_1_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i2.u24.TestAlone_0_1_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i0.i1.u23.TestAlone_2_0_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i6.u28.TestAlone_0_0_2>=1)))||((i4.i1.u20.TestAlone_1_0_0>=1)&&(i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)))||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i0.i1.u17.TestAlone_2_0_0>=1))) U (((i7.u5.EndTurn_0_0>=1)||(i0.i0.u6.EndTurn_2_0>=1))||(i1.u7.EndTurn_1_0>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E((((((((((((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i4.i0.u14.TestAlone_1_0_2>=1))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i3.u19.TestAlone_1_1_2>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i2.u12.TestAlone_0_1_2>=1)))||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i5.i1.u25.TestAlone_2_1_0>=1)))||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i1.u9.TestAlone_1_1_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i5.i0.u29.TestAlone_2_1_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i2.u24.TestAlone_0_1_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i0.i1.u23.TestAlone_2_0_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i6.u28.TestAlone_0_0_2>=1)))||((i4.i1.u20.TestAlone_1_0_0>=1)&&(i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)))||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i0.i1.u17.TestAlone_2_0_0>=1))) U (((i7.u5.EndTurn_0_0>=1)||(i0.i0.u6.EndTurn_2_0>=1))||(i1.u7.EndTurn_1_0>=1))))),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((((((((((((i6.u28.TestIdentity_0_0_2>=1)||(i0.i1.u17.TestIdentity_2_0_0>=1))||(i5.i0.u29.TestIdentity_2_1_1>=1))||(i4.i0.u14.TestIdentity_1_0_2>=1))||(i2.u24.TestIdentity_0_1_1>=1))||(i0.i1.u23.TestIdentity_2_0_1>=1))||(i5.i1.u25.TestIdentity_2_1_0>=1))||(i1.u9.TestIdentity_1_1_0>=1))||(i3.u19.TestIdentity_1_1_2>=1))||(i6.u26.TestIdentity_0_0_1>=1))||(i4.i1.u20.TestIdentity_1_0_0>=1))||(i2.u12.TestIdentity_0_1_2>=1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions NotAlone_0_2_0, NotAlone_2_1_0, NotAlone_1_2_0, NotAlone_0_2_1, NotAlone_1_2_1, UpdateTurn_1_0_0, UpdateTurn_2_1_0, UpdateTurn_2_0_0, UpdateTurn_0_1_0, UpdateTurn_2_2_1, UpdateTurn_2_0_1, UpdateTurn_0_1_1, UpdateTurn_1_2_0, UpdateTurn_0_2_0, UpdateTurn_0_0_1, BecomeIdle_2, BecomeIdle_1, BecomeIdle_0, i0.i0.EndLoop_2_0, i0.i1.u22.UpdateTurn_2_2_0, i1.UpdateTurn_1_1_1, i1.UpdateTurn_1_0_1, i1.u7.EndLoop_1_0, i4.i1.u21.UpdateTurn_1_1_0, i5.NotAlone_2_1_1, i6.u18.UpdateTurn_0_0_0, i7.u5.EndLoop_0_0, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0/96/27/123
(forward)formula 2,1,0.79405,30588,1,0,53520,231,2166,76617,229,640,132117
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((((((((((((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i4.i0.u14.TestAlone_1_0_2>=1))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i0.i1.u17.TestAlone_2_0_0>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i3.u19.TestAlone_1_1_2>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i2.u12.TestAlone_0_1_2>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i0.i1.u23.TestAlone_2_0_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i2.u24.TestAlone_0_1_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i5.i0.u29.TestAlone_2_1_1>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i6.u28.TestAlone_0_0_2>=1)))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i4.i1.u20.TestAlone_1_0_0>=1)))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i5.i1.u25.TestAlone_2_1_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1>=1)))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i1.u9.TestAlone_1_1_0>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((((((((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i4.i0.u14.TestAlone_1_0_2>=1))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i0.i1.u17.TestAlone_2_0_0>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i3.u19.TestAlone_1_1_2>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i2.u12.TestAlone_0_1_2>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i0.i1.u23.TestAlone_2_0_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i2.u24.TestAlone_0_1_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i5.i0.u29.TestAlone_2_1_1>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i6.u28.TestAlone_0_0_2>=1)))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i4.i1.u20.TestAlone_1_0_0>=1)))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i5.i1.u25.TestAlone_2_1_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1>=1)))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i1.u9.TestAlone_1_1_0>=1)))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 3,0,0.941523,33756,1,0,58857,231,2248,85337,229,655,156333
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(EF((((((((i4.i1.u21.TestTurn_1_0>=1)&&(i4.i1.u21.Turn_0_1>=1))||((i6.u18.TestTurn_0_0>=1)&&(i6.u18.Turn_0_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u8.TestTurn_2_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_2>=1)))||((i1.u9.TestTurn_1_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_1>=1)))||((i0.i1.u22.TestTurn_2_0>=1)&&(i0.i1.u22.Turn_0_2>=1)))||((i7.u33.TestTurn_0_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_0>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((((i4.i1.u21.TestTurn_1_0>=1)&&(i4.i1.u21.Turn_0_1>=1))||((i6.u18.TestTurn_0_0>=1)&&(i6.u18.Turn_0_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u8.TestTurn_2_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_2>=1)))||((i1.u9.TestTurn_1_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_1>=1)))||((i0.i1.u22.TestTurn_2_0>=1)&&(i0.i1.u22.Turn_0_2>=1)))||((i7.u33.TestTurn_0_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_0>=1))))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 4,1,0.954645,34020,1,0,59456,231,2277,86162,231,655,159024
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EX(((((((EF(((((((((((((i6.u28.TestIdentity_0_0_2>=1)||(i0.i1.u17.TestIdentity_2_0_0>=1))||(i5.i0.u29.TestIdentity_2_1_1>=1))||(i4.i0.u14.TestIdentity_1_0_2>=1))||(i2.u24.TestIdentity_0_1_1>=1))||(i0.i1.u23.TestIdentity_2_0_1>=1))||(i5.i1.u25.TestIdentity_2_1_0>=1))||(i1.u9.TestIdentity_1_1_0>=1))||(i3.u19.TestIdentity_1_1_2>=1))||(i6.u26.TestIdentity_0_0_1>=1))||(i4.i1.u20.TestIdentity_1_0_0>=1))||(i2.u12.TestIdentity_0_1_2>=1))) * ((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F<1)||(i5.i1.u32.Idle_1<1))) * ((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F<1)||(i7.u31.Idle_2<1))) * ((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F<1)||(i3.u16.Idle_0<1))) * ((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F<1)||(i5.i1.u32.Idle_1<1))) * ((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F<1)||(i7.u31.Idle_2<1))) * ((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F<1)||(i3.u16.Idle_0<1)))) + A((((((((((((((((((((i6.u26.BeginLoop_0_0_1<1)&&(i5.i0.u2.BeginLoop_2_1_1<1))&&(i6.u28.BeginLoop_0_0_2<1))&&(i2.u11.BeginLoop_0_1_1<1))&&(i2.u12.BeginLoop_0_1_2<1))&&(i3.u1.BeginLoop_1_1_1<1))&&(i4.i0.u14.BeginLoop_1_0_2<1))&&(i3.u13.BeginLoop_1_1_2<1))&&(i0.i0.u4.BeginLoop_2_0_2<1))&&(i5.i1.u27.BeginLoop_2_1_2<1))&&(i6.u0.BeginLoop_0_0_0<1))&&(i0.i1.u17.BeginLoop_2_0_0<1))&&(i4.i1.u20.BeginLoop_1_0_0<1))&&(i1.u9.BeginLoop_1_1_0<1))&&(i2.u10.BeginLoop_0_1_0<1))&&(i4.i0.u3.BeginLoop_1_0_1<1))&&(i0.i1.u23.BeginLoop_2_0_1<1))&&(i5.i1.u25.BeginLoop_2_1_0<1))||((((((((((((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i4.i0.u14.TestAlone_1_0_2>=1))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i3.u19.TestAlone_1_1_2>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i2.u12.TestAlone_0_1_2>=1)))||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i5.i1.u25.TestAlone_2_1_0>=1)))||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i1.u9.TestAlone_1_1_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i5.i0.u29.TestAlone_2_1_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i2.u24.TestAlone_0_1_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i0.i1.u23.TestAlone_2_0_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i6.u28.TestAlone_0_0_2>=1)))||((i4.i1.u20.TestAlone_1_0_0>=1)&&(i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)))||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i0.i1.u17.TestAlone_2_0_0>=1)))&&((((((((((((i6.u0.IsEndLoop_0_0_0>=1)||(i4.i0.u3.IsEndLoop_1_0_0>=1))||(i0.i1.u23.IsEndLoop_2_0_0>=1))||(i2.u11.IsEndLoop_0_1_0>=1))||(i3.u1.IsEndLoop_1_1_0>=1))||(i5.i0.u2.IsEndLoop_2_1_0>=1))||(i6.u28.IsEndLoop_0_0_1>=1))||(i4.i0.u3.IsEndLoop_1_0_1>=1))||(i0.i0.u4.IsEndLoop_2_0_1>=1))||(i2.u12.IsEndLoop_0_1_1>=1))||(i3.u13.IsEndLoop_1_1_1>=1))||(i5.i1.u15.IsEndLoop_2_1_1>=1)))) U ((((((((((((((((((i6.u26.BeginLoop_0_0_1>=1)||(i5.i0.u2.BeginLoop_2_1_1>=1))||(i6.u28.BeginLoop_0_0_2>=1))||(i2.u11.BeginLoop_0_1_1>=1))||(i2.u12.BeginLoop_0_1_2>=1))||(i3.u1.BeginLoop_1_1_1>=1))||(i4.i0.u14.BeginLoop_1_0_2>=1))||(i3.u13.BeginLoop_1_1_2>=1))||(i0.i0.u4.BeginLoop_2_0_2>=1))||(i5.i1.u27.BeginLoop_2_1_2>=1))||(i6.u0.BeginLoop_0_0_0>=1))||(i0.i1.u17.BeginLoop_2_0_0>=1))||(i4.i1.u20.BeginLoop_1_0_0>=1))||(i1.u9.BeginLoop_1_1_0>=1))||(i2.u10.BeginLoop_0_1_0>=1))||(i4.i0.u3.BeginLoop_1_0_1>=1))||(i0.i1.u23.BeginLoop_2_0_1>=1))||(i5.i1.u25.BeginLoop_2_1_0>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((((((EY(Init) * ((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F<1)||(i3.u16.Idle_0<1))) * ((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F<1)||(i7.u31.Idle_2<1))) * ((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F<1)||(i5.i1.u32.Idle_1<1))) * ((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F<1)||(i3.u16.Idle_0<1))) * ((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F<1)||(i7.u31.Idle_2<1))) * ((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F<1)||(i5.i1.u32.Idle_1<1))),TRUE) * ((((((((((((i6.u28.TestIdentity_0_0_2>=1)||(i0.i1.u17.TestIdentity_2_0_0>=1))||(i5.i0.u29.TestIdentity_2_1_1>=1))||(i4.i0.u14.TestIdentity_1_0_2>=1))||(i2.u24.TestIdentity_0_1_1>=1))||(i0.i1.u23.TestIdentity_2_0_1>=1))||(i5.i1.u25.TestIdentity_2_1_0>=1))||(i1.u9.TestIdentity_1_1_0>=1))||(i3.u19.TestIdentity_1_1_2>=1))||(i6.u26.TestIdentity_0_0_1>=1))||(i4.i1.u20.TestIdentity_1_0_0>=1))||(i2.u12.TestIdentity_0_1_2>=1)))] != FALSE + [((Init * !(EG(!(((((((((((((((((((i6.u26.BeginLoop_0_0_1>=1)||(i5.i0.u2.BeginLoop_2_1_1>=1))||(i6.u28.BeginLoop_0_0_2>=1))||(i2.u11.BeginLoop_0_1_1>=1))||(i2.u12.BeginLoop_0_1_2>=1))||(i3.u1.BeginLoop_1_1_1>=1))||(i4.i0.u14.BeginLoop_1_0_2>=1))||(i3.u13.BeginLoop_1_1_2>=1))||(i0.i0.u4.BeginLoop_2_0_2>=1))||(i5.i1.u27.BeginLoop_2_1_2>=1))||(i6.u0.BeginLoop_0_0_0>=1))||(i0.i1.u17.BeginLoop_2_0_0>=1))||(i4.i1.u20.BeginLoop_1_0_0>=1))||(i1.u9.BeginLoop_1_1_0>=1))||(i2.u10.BeginLoop_0_1_0>=1))||(i4.i0.u3.BeginLoop_1_0_1>=1))||(i0.i1.u23.BeginLoop_2_0_1>=1))||(i5.i1.u25.BeginLoop_2_1_0>=1)))))) * !(E(!(((((((((((((((((((i6.u26.BeginLoop_0_0_1>=1)||(i5.i0.u2.BeginLoop_2_1_1>=1))||(i6.u28.BeginLoop_0_0_2>=1))||(i2.u11.BeginLoop_0_1_1>=1))||(i2.u12.BeginLoop_0_1_2>=1))||(i3.u1.BeginLoop_1_1_1>=1))||(i4.i0.u14.BeginLoop_1_0_2>=1))||(i3.u13.BeginLoop_1_1_2>=1))||(i0.i0.u4.BeginLoop_2_0_2>=1))||(i5.i1.u27.BeginLoop_2_1_2>=1))||(i6.u0.BeginLoop_0_0_0>=1))||(i0.i1.u17.BeginLoop_2_0_0>=1))||(i4.i1.u20.BeginLoop_1_0_0>=1))||(i1.u9.BeginLoop_1_1_0>=1))||(i2.u10.BeginLoop_0_1_0>=1))||(i4.i0.u3.BeginLoop_1_0_1>=1))||(i0.i1.u23.BeginLoop_2_0_1>=1))||(i5.i1.u25.BeginLoop_2_1_0>=1))) U (!((((((((((((((((((((i6.u26.BeginLoop_0_0_1<1)&&(i5.i0.u2.BeginLoop_2_1_1<1))&&(i6.u28.BeginLoop_0_0_2<1))&&(i2.u11.BeginLoop_0_1_1<1))&&(i2.u12.BeginLoop_0_1_2<1))&&(i3.u1.BeginLoop_1_1_1<1))&&(i4.i0.u14.BeginLoop_1_0_2<1))&&(i3.u13.BeginLoop_1_1_2<1))&&(i0.i0.u4.BeginLoop_2_0_2<1))&&(i5.i1.u27.BeginLoop_2_1_2<1))&&(i6.u0.BeginLoop_0_0_0<1))&&(i0.i1.u17.BeginLoop_2_0_0<1))&&(i4.i1.u20.BeginLoop_1_0_0<1))&&(i1.u9.BeginLoop_1_1_0<1))&&(i2.u10.BeginLoop_0_1_0<1))&&(i4.i0.u3.BeginLoop_1_0_1<1))&&(i0.i1.u23.BeginLoop_2_0_1<1))&&(i5.i1.u25.BeginLoop_2_1_0<1))||((((((((((((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i4.i0.u14.TestAlone_1_0_2>=1))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i3.u19.TestAlone_1_1_2>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i2.u12.TestAlone_0_1_2>=1)))||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i5.i1.u25.TestAlone_2_1_0>=1)))||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i1.u9.TestAlone_1_1_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i5.i0.u29.TestAlone_2_1_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i2.u24.TestAlone_0_1_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i0.i1.u23.TestAlone_2_0_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F>=1)&&(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F>=1)&&(i6.u28.TestAlone_0_0_2>=1)))||((i4.i1.u20.TestAlone_1_0_0>=1)&&(i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)))||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i0.i1.u17.TestAlone_2_0_0>=1)))&&((((((((((((i6.u0.IsEndLoop_0_0_0>=1)||(i4.i0.u3.IsEndLoop_1_0_0>=1))||(i0.i1.u23.IsEndLoop_2_0_0>=1))||(i2.u11.IsEndLoop_0_1_0>=1))||(i3.u1.IsEndLoop_1_1_0>=1))||(i5.i0.u2.IsEndLoop_2_1_0>=1))||(i6.u28.IsEndLoop_0_0_1>=1))||(i4.i0.u3.IsEndLoop_1_0_1>=1))||(i0.i0.u4.IsEndLoop_2_0_1>=1))||(i2.u12.IsEndLoop_0_1_1>=1))||(i3.u13.IsEndLoop_1_1_1>=1))||(i5.i1.u15.IsEndLoop_2_1_1>=1))))) * !(((((((((((((((((((i6.u26.BeginLoop_0_0_1>=1)||(i5.i0.u2.BeginLoop_2_1_1>=1))||(i6.u28.BeginLoop_0_0_2>=1))||(i2.u11.BeginLoop_0_1_1>=1))||(i2.u12.BeginLoop_0_1_2>=1))||(i3.u1.BeginLoop_1_1_1>=1))||(i4.i0.u14.BeginLoop_1_0_2>=1))||(i3.u13.BeginLoop_1_1_2>=1))||(i0.i0.u4.BeginLoop_2_0_2>=1))||(i5.i1.u27.BeginLoop_2_1_2>=1))||(i6.u0.BeginLoop_0_0_0>=1))||(i0.i1.u17.BeginLoop_2_0_0>=1))||(i4.i1.u20.BeginLoop_1_0_0>=1))||(i1.u9.BeginLoop_1_1_0>=1))||(i2.u10.BeginLoop_0_1_0>=1))||(i4.i0.u3.BeginLoop_1_0_1>=1))||(i0.i1.u23.BeginLoop_2_0_1>=1))||(i5.i1.u25.BeginLoop_2_1_0>=1)))))))] != FALSE)
(forward)formula 5,0,1.19538,41412,1,0,74821,256,2606,114119,233,690,195478
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(EF(AX((((((((((((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i4.i0.u14.TestAlone_1_0_2>=1))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i0.i1.u17.TestAlone_2_0_0>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i3.u19.TestAlone_1_1_2>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i2.u12.TestAlone_0_1_2>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i0.i1.u23.TestAlone_2_0_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i2.u24.TestAlone_0_1_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i5.i0.u29.TestAlone_2_1_1>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i6.u28.TestAlone_0_0_2>=1)))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i4.i1.u20.TestAlone_1_0_0>=1)))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i5.i1.u25.TestAlone_2_1_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1>=1)))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i1.u9.TestAlone_1_1_0>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((((((((((((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i4.i0.u14.TestAlone_1_0_2>=1))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i0.i1.u17.TestAlone_2_0_0>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i3.u19.TestAlone_1_1_2>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i2.u12.TestAlone_0_1_2>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i0.i1.u23.TestAlone_2_0_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i2.u24.TestAlone_0_1_1>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i5.i0.u29.TestAlone_2_1_1>=1)))||((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i6.u28.TestAlone_0_0_2>=1)))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i4.i1.u20.TestAlone_1_0_0>=1)))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i5.i1.u25.TestAlone_2_1_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1>=1)))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i1.u9.TestAlone_1_1_0>=1)))))))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 6,1,1.33222,42996,1,0,77893,265,2606,119357,233,699,203784
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: !(EF(((((i7.u5.EndTurn_0_0>=1)||(i0.i0.u6.EndTurn_2_0>=1))||(i1.u7.EndTurn_1_0>=1))&&((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i5.i1.u8.CS_2>=1))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i7.u33.CS_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i1.u34.CS_1>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((((i7.u5.EndTurn_0_0>=1)||(i0.i0.u6.EndTurn_2_0>=1))||(i1.u7.EndTurn_1_0>=1))&&((((i7.u31.WantSection_2_T>=1)&&(i5.i1.u8.CS_2>=1))||((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i7.u33.CS_0>=1)))||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i1.u34.CS_1>=1)))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 7,0,1.33824,43260,1,0,77936,265,2613,119394,233,699,204238
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((AG(((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F<1)||(i2.u12.TestAlone_0_1_2<1))) + (AG(((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i7.u33.CS_0>=1))) * ((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F<1)||(i6.u28.TestAlone_0_0_2<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !(((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F<1)||(i2.u12.TestAlone_0_1_2<1))))) + (!(E(TRUE U !(((i3.u16.WantSection_0_T>=1)&&(i7.u33.CS_0>=1))))) * ((i7.u31.WantSection_2_F<1)||(i6.u28.TestAlone_0_0_2<1))))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 8,0,1.44537,45108,1,0,82420,270,2620,125519,233,716,216287
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((((i0.i1.u23.IsEndLoop_2_0_0>=1)&&(i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1))&&(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((i0.i1.u23.IsEndLoop_2_0_0>=1)&&(i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1))&&(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1>=1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 9,1,1.46234,45372,1,0,82431,270,2624,125534,233,716,216335
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(EF(((i4.i1.u20.TestIdentity_1_0_0<1)&&((i1.u30.Turn_1_0<1)||(i1.u7.AskForSection_1_1<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((i4.i1.u20.TestIdentity_1_0_0<1)&&((i1.u30.Turn_1_0<1)||(i1.u7.AskForSection_1_1<1))))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 10,1,1.47568,45372,1,0,83197,270,2629,126543,233,716,218265
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E(EX((i1.u7.EndTurn_1_0<1)) U AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX((i1.u7.EndTurn_1_0<1))) * !(EX(!(FALSE))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 11,0,1.48218,45636,1,0,83330,270,2629,126801,233,716,218577
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E(((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i3.u16.Idle_0>=1)) U ((i1.u30.Turn_1_0>=1)&&(i7.u5.AskForSection_0_1>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i3.u16.Idle_0>=1))) * ((i1.u30.Turn_1_0>=1)&&(i7.u5.AskForSection_0_1>=1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 12,0,1.50734,46428,1,0,84657,301,2891,128840,240,814,224375
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(AX(((i1.u9.TestTurn_1_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_1>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((i1.u9.TestTurn_1_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_1>=1))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 13,0,1.5295,46956,1,0,85485,301,2893,129848,240,814,226246
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E(((i4.i0.u14.BeginLoop_1_0_2<1)||((i5.i1.u8.TestTurn_2_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_1>=1))) U ((((i0.i0.u6.EndTurn_2_0<1)&&((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F<1)||(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1<1)))&&((i0.i0.u4.TestIdentity_2_0_2>=1)||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i2.u24.TestAlone_0_1_1>=1))))&&((i4.i0.u3.BeginLoop_1_0_1>=1)||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i0.i1.u17.TestAlone_2_0_0>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((i4.i0.u14.BeginLoop_1_0_2<1)||((i5.i1.u8.TestTurn_2_1>=1)&&(i1.u30.Turn_1_1>=1)))) * ((((i0.i0.u6.EndTurn_2_0<1)&&((i5.i1.u15.WantSection_1_F<1)||(i6.u26.TestAlone_0_0_1<1)))&&((i0.i0.u4.TestIdentity_2_0_2>=1)||((i5.i1.u32.WantSection_1_T>=1)&&(i2.u24.TestAlone_0_1_1>=1))))&&((i4.i0.u3.BeginLoop_1_0_1>=1)||((i3.u1.WantSection_0_F>=1)&&(i0.i1.u17.TestAlone_2_0_0>=1)))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 14,1,1.6393,50916,1,0,94456,306,2962,140310,240,864,252651
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(!(EF((i0.i1.u17.TestIdentity_2_0_0<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (i0.i1.u17.TestIdentity_2_0_0<1))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 15,0,1.65525,51180,1,0,94534,306,2963,140319,240,864,253014
FORMULA Peterson-PT-2-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************


BK_STOP 1590022952296

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//itstools/its-tools -data /home/mcc/execution/workspace -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/.eclipse -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx16000m -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Dosgi.requiredJavaVersion=1.6

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Peterson-PT-2"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Peterson-PT-2, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r111-csrt-158961258000708"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Peterson-PT-2.tgz
mv Peterson-PT-2 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;