fond
Model Checking Contest 2020
10th edition, Paris, France, June 23, 2020
Execution of r051-ebro-158902545600020
Last Updated
Jun 28, 2020

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for CloudReconfiguration-PT-303

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
15756.390 1764899.00 1826699.00 1226.80 TFFTTFTFFFTFFFTT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.r051-ebro-158902545600020.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is CloudReconfiguration-PT-303, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r051-ebro-158902545600020
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 844K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K Mar 30 01:48 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Mar 30 01:48 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K Mar 28 16:12 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Mar 28 16:12 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Mar 24 05:37 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K Mar 24 05:37 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Apr 8 14:46 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Apr 28 14:00 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 8 14:46 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 28 14:00 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Mar 27 08:46 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Mar 27 08:46 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K Mar 26 08:13 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Mar 26 08:13 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Mar 28 14:49 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Mar 28 14:49 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 24 05:37 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 Mar 24 05:37 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 24 05:37 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 660K Mar 24 05:37 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1589489986941

[2020-05-14 20:59:51] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsminpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2020-05-14 20:59:51] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2020-05-14 20:59:51] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 442 ms
[2020-05-14 20:59:51] [INFO ] Transformed 2584 places.
[2020-05-14 20:59:51] [INFO ] Transformed 3094 transitions.
[2020-05-14 20:59:51] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2020-05-14 20:59:51] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 2584 places and 3094 transitions in 585 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 120 ms.
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 1095 resets, run finished after 1063 ms. (steps per millisecond=94 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]
// Phase 1: matrix 3094 rows 2584 cols
[2020-05-14 20:59:53] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 164 ms
[2020-05-14 20:59:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 142 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 20:59:54] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:00:13] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:00:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19138 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:00:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 184 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:00:15] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:00:33] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:00:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 18526 ms returned unknown
[2020-05-14 21:00:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 116 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:00:34] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:00:53] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:00:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19353 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:00:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 114 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:00:54] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:01:13] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:01:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19355 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:01:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 111 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:01:14] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:01:33] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:01:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19385 ms returned unknown
[2020-05-14 21:01:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 119 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:01:34] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:01:53] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:01:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19315 ms returned unknown
[2020-05-14 21:01:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 129 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:01:55] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:02:13] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:02:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 18455 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:02:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 116 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:02:14] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:02:33] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe (= s1948 (- t710 t2957))") while checking expression at index 7
[2020-05-14 21:02:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 131 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:02:34] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:02:53] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:02:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19283 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:02:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 116 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:02:54] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:03:13] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:03:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19420 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:03:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 122 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:03:14] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:03:33] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:03:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19391 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:03:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 109 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:03:34] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:03:53] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:03:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19433 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:03:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 130 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:03:54] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:03:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 4560 ms returned unsat
[2020-05-14 21:03:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 116 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:03:59] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:04:19] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:04:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19370 ms returned unknown
[2020-05-14 21:04:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 115 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:04:19] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:04:39] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:04:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19369 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:04:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 115 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:04:39] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:04:59] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:04:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19403 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:04:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 145 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:04:59] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:05:19] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:05:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19376 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:05:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 141 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:05:19] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:05:39] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:05:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19339 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:05:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 152 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:05:39] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:05:59] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:05:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19376 ms returned unknown
[2020-05-14 21:06:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 114 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:06:00] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:06:19] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:06:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 18605 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:06:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 131 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:06:20] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:06:39] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:06:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19216 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:06:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 119 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:06:39] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:06:59] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:06:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19416 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:06:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 113 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:06:59] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:07:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19429 ms returned (error "Solver has unexpectedly terminated")
[2020-05-14 21:07:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 132 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:07:20] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:07:39] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:07:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19354 ms returned unknown
[2020-05-14 21:07:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 117 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:07:39] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:07:59] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:07:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19485 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:08:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 132 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:08:00] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:08:19] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:08:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19390 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:08:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 137 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:08:20] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:08:39] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:08:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 18644 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:08:40] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 118 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:08:40] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:08:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 4232 ms returned unsat
[2020-05-14 21:08:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 132 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:08:45] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:09:04] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:09:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19344 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:09:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 123 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:09:05] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:09:24] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:09:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 18915 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:09:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 115 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:09:25] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:09:44] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:09:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 18931 ms returned (error "Failed to check-sat")
[2020-05-14 21:09:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 117 ms returned sat
[2020-05-14 21:09:45] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-14 21:10:04] [INFO ] SMT solver returned unknown. Retrying;
[2020-05-14 21:10:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19388 ms returned unknown
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 2 simplifications.
[2020-05-14 21:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 484 ms
[2020-05-14 21:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 240 ms
[2020-05-14 21:10:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2020-05-14 21:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 180 ms
Converted graph to binary with : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/convert-linux64, -i, /tmp/graph10772136648167131176.txt, -o, /tmp/graph10772136648167131176.bin, -w, /tmp/graph10772136648167131176.weights], workingDir=null]
Built communities with : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/louvain-linux64, /tmp/graph10772136648167131176.bin, -l, -1, -v, -w, /tmp/graph10772136648167131176.weights, -q, 0, -e, 0.001], workingDir=null]
[2020-05-14 21:10:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2020-05-14 21:10:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2020-05-14 21:10:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 576 redundant transitions.
[2020-05-14 21:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 445 ms
[2020-05-14 21:10:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 63 ms.
[2020-05-14 21:10:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal : 126 ms
[2020-05-14 21:10:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, --quiet, -i, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -ctl, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -ctl /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 16 CTL formulae.
built 92 ordering constraints for composite.
built 18 ordering constraints for composite.
built 38 ordering constraints for composite.
built 26 ordering constraints for composite.
built 22 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 11 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 11 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 19 ordering constraints for composite.
built 35 ordering constraints for composite.
built 28 ordering constraints for composite.
built 12 ordering constraints for composite.
built 110 ordering constraints for composite.
built 59 ordering constraints for composite.
built 50 ordering constraints for composite.
built 48 ordering constraints for composite.
built 24 ordering constraints for composite.
built 32 ordering constraints for composite.
built 18 ordering constraints for composite.
built 13 ordering constraints for composite.
built 11 ordering constraints for composite.
built 109 ordering constraints for composite.
built 34 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 28 ordering constraints for composite.
built 51 ordering constraints for composite.
built 27 ordering constraints for composite.
built 32 ordering constraints for composite.
built 51 ordering constraints for composite.
built 24 ordering constraints for composite.
built 135 ordering constraints for composite.
built 53 ordering constraints for composite.
built 31 ordering constraints for composite.
built 60 ordering constraints for composite.
built 18 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 13 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 34 ordering constraints for composite.
built 51 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 61 ordering constraints for composite.
built 13 ordering constraints for composite.
built 17 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 3 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 110 ordering constraints for composite.
built 12 ordering constraints for composite.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.5244e+10,20.146,342260,8868,214,518820,30714,3068,1.84664e+06,162,167023,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((i5.i0.i1.i0.u142.p327==1)||(i36.u839.p2073!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((i5.i0.i1.i0.u142.p327==1)||(i36.u839.p2073!=1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t36, t59, t323, t435, t481, t548, t625, t777, t1041, t1121, t1199, t1275, t1494, t1758, t1838, t1916, t1992, t2238, t2395, t2458, t2678, t2868, i0.t2866, i0.t2860, i0.t2854, i0.t2848, i0.t2846, i0.t2841, i0.t2835, i0.t2807, i0.t2647, i0.t2642, i0.t2637, i0.t2628, i0.t2626, i0.t2621, i0.t2615, i0.t2587, i0.t2427, i0.t2422, i0.t2417, i0.t2408, i0.t2406, i0.t2401, i0.t2367, i0.t2207, i0.t2202, i0.t2197, i0.u5.t2181, i10.t2176, i10.t2168, i10.t1467, i10.u253.t2152, i14.t2041, i14.t2039, i14.t2024, i14.t1957, i14.t1922, i14.u337.t1915, i14.u331.t1946, i15.t1896, i15.t1737, i15.t1733, i15.t1732, i15.t1471, i15.u240.t1464, i15.u240.t2131, i15.u399.t1735, i17.t1889, i17.t1887, i17.t1870, i17.t1829, i17.t1799, i17.t1764, i17.t1757, i17.u387.t1788, i18.t1573, i18.t1569, i20.t1519, i20.t1515, i21.t1726, i21.t1724, i21.t1722, i21.t1720, i21.t1718, i21.t1705, i21.t1703, i21.t1689, i21.t1675, i21.t1673, i21.t1671, i21.t1667, i21.t1663, i21.t1651, i21.t1649, i21.t1626, i21.t1624, i21.t1610, i21.t1606, i21.t1604, i21.t1589, i21.t1587, i21.t1533, i21.u492.t1493, i21.u492.t1497, i21.u492.t1504, i21.u492.t1524, i21.u492.t1531, i21.u492.t1548, i21.u492.t1551, i21.u492.t1558, i21.u492.t1578, i21.u492.t1585, i21.u492.t1600, i21.u492.t1622, i21.u492.t1680, i21.u492.t1687, i21.u492.t1694, i21.u492.t1701, i21.u492.t1711, i22.t1459, i22.t1435, i22.u510.t1451, i24.t1179, i24.t1020, i24.t1016, i24.t1015, i24.t754, i24.t750, i24.u771.t747, i24.u771.t1414, i24.u664.t1018, i26.t1324, i26.t1307, i26.t1240, i26.t1205, i26.t1198, i26.u563.t1322, i26.u595.t1229, i27.t1172, i27.t1170, i27.t1153, i27.t1112, i27.t1047, i27.t1040, i27.u657.t1082, i27.u644.t1071, i29.t1009, i29.t1007, i29.t1005, i29.t1003, i29.t1001, i29.t988, i29.t986, i29.t972, i29.t958, i29.t956, i29.t954, i29.t950, i29.t946, i29.t934, i29.t932, i29.t909, i29.t907, i29.t893, i29.t889, i29.t885, i29.t872, i29.t870, i29.t816, i29.u6.t4, i29.u757.t776, i29.u757.t780, i29.u757.t787, i29.u757.t807, i29.u757.t814, i29.u757.t831, i29.u757.t834, i29.u757.t841, i29.u757.t861, i29.u757.t868, i29.u757.t883, i29.u757.t905, i29.u757.t963, i29.u757.t970, i29.u757.t977, i29.u757.t984, i29.u757.t994, i30.t856, i30.t852, i32.i0.i1.t798, i32.i0.i1.i0.t802, i33.t461, i33.t302, i33.t298, i33.t297, i33.u934.t300, i33.u772.t29, i33.u772.t696, i33.u829.t686, i33.u830.t609, i33.u804.t671, i33.u825.t617, i35.t741, i35.t733, i35.t32, i35.u787.t717, i37.t606, i37.t589, i37.t522, i37.t487, i37.t480, i37.u878.t604, i37.u861.t511, i39.t452, i39.t403, i39.t394, i39.t364, i39.t329, i39.t322, i39.u932.t454, i39.u920.t353, i40.t291, i40.t289, i40.t287, i40.t285, i40.t283, i40.t270, i40.t268, i40.t254, i40.t240, i40.t238, i40.t236, i40.t232, i40.t228, i40.t216, i40.t214, i40.t191, i40.t189, i40.t175, i40.t171, i40.t167, i40.t154, i40.t152, i40.t98, i40.u1027.t58, i40.u1027.t62, i40.u1027.t69, i40.u1027.t89, i40.u1027.t96, i40.u1027.t113, i40.u1027.t116, i40.u1027.t123, i40.u1027.t143, i40.u1027.t150, i40.u1027.t165, i40.u1027.t187, i40.u1027.t245, i40.u1027.t252, i40.u1027.t259, i40.u1027.t266, i40.u1027.t276, i41.t138, i41.t134, i43.i0.i1.t80, i43.i0.i1.i0.t84, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :176/2637/267/3080
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
(forward)formula 0,1,69.0265,1040392,1,0,1.35476e+06,50633,35053,5.17981e+06,933,293941,8410689
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A((((i21.u450.p1108!=1)||(i21.u407.p998!=1)) + AX((i40.u953.p2353==1))) U EG(((i36.u845.p2077==1)||(i29.u684.p1743==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(((i36.u845.p2077==1)||(i29.u684.p1743==1))))))) * !(E(!(EG(((i36.u845.p2077==1)||(i29.u684.p1743==1)))) U (!((((i21.u450.p1108!=1)||(i21.u407.p998!=1)) + !(EX(!((i40.u953.p2353==1)))))) * !(EG(((i36.u845.p2077==1)||(i29.u684.p1743==1))))))))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
(forward)formula 1,0,374.675,2482348,1,0,2.76431e+06,51180,9244,2.36877e+07,423,297826,2798185
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (AF((i17.u378.p923==1)) * EG(EF((i38.u903.p2229==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((i17.u378.p923==1)))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EG(E(TRUE U (i38.u903.p2229==1)))))] = FALSE)
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
(forward)formula 2,0,443.043,2995828,1,0,3.82677e+06,51180,7793,2.45977e+07,379,297826,204296
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: !(AF((((((i29.u703.p1745==1)&&(i41.u995.p2461==1))&&(i14.u295.p723==1))||(i29.u235.p571==1))||((i7.u192.p471==1)&&(i40.u1027.p2526==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((i29.u703.p1745==1)&&(i41.u995.p2461==1))&&(i14.u295.p723==1))||(i29.u235.p571==1))||((i7.u192.p471==1)&&(i40.u1027.p2526==1)))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 3,1,481.579,2995828,1,0,3.82677e+06,51180,12423,2.45977e+07,442,297826,3197437
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (!(EG((((i17.u350.p908==1)&&(i25.u566.p1410==1))&&(i40.u967.p2386==1)))) * !(A((i8.u184.p450!=1) U (i29.u681.p1692==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(((i17.u350.p908==1)&&(i25.u566.p1410==1))&&(i40.u967.p2386==1)))] = FALSE * [((Init * !(EG(!((i29.u681.p1692==1))))) * !(E(!((i29.u681.p1692==1)) U (!((i8.u184.p450!=1)) * !((i29.u681.p1692==1))))))] = FALSE)
(forward)formula 4,1,521.501,2995828,1,0,3.82677e+06,51180,19595,2.45977e+07,520,297826,5849080
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(AG(((i29.u235.p572==1)&&(i19.u464.p1145==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i29.u235.p572==1)&&(i19.u464.p1145==1))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 5,0,522.356,2995828,1,0,3.82677e+06,51180,20181,2.45977e+07,525,297826,5994560
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(((i14.u321.p784==1)||(i3.u51.p131==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((i14.u321.p784==1)||(i3.u51.p131==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 6,1,522.368,2995828,1,0,3.82677e+06,51180,20184,2.45977e+07,525,297826,5996790
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AG((i13.u313.p767!=1)) + AF(AG(((i6.u172.p422==1)||(i1.u44.p122==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !((i13.u313.p767!=1)))))),!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i6.u172.p422==1)||(i1.u44.p122==1)))))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 7,0,562.172,3201480,1,0,3.82677e+06,51180,21371,2.76602e+07,539,297826,8369951
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(((i40.u978.p2410==1)||((i27.u640.p1587!=1)&&(i17.u371.p849!=1))) U !(EF((i29.u717.p1776==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U (i29.u717.p1776==1))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U (i29.u717.p1776==1)))) U (!(((i40.u978.p2410==1)||((i27.u640.p1587!=1)&&(i17.u371.p849!=1)))) * !(!(E(TRUE U (i29.u717.p1776==1))))))))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
(forward)formula 8,0,1088.45,4317520,1,0,4.38748e+06,51180,14316,3.32632e+07,468,297826,6956667
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(!(EF((i26.u597.p1474==1))) U (i13.u309.p758==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((i13.u309.p758==1))))) * !(E(!((i13.u309.p758==1)) U (!(!(E(TRUE U (i26.u597.p1474==1)))) * !((i13.u309.p758==1))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 9,0,1104.93,4317520,1,0,4.38748e+06,51180,14402,3.32632e+07,470,297826,8078759
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E((i8.u176.p431!=1) U ((i26.u605.p1494==1)&&(i0.u233.p568==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(i8.u176.p431!=1)) * ((i26.u605.p1494==1)&&(i0.u233.p568==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 10,1,1123.3,4317520,1,0,4.38748e+06,54639,21759,3.32632e+07,559,343131,9968308
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E((((i29.u235.p572!=1)||(i22.u511.p1262!=1))&&(((i18.u453.p1119==1)||(i21.u414.p1016==1))||(i40.u978.p2420==1))) U AF(((i12.u276.p671==1)||(i17.u387.p943==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((i29.u235.p572!=1)||(i22.u511.p1262!=1))&&(((i18.u453.p1119==1)||(i21.u414.p1016==1))||(i40.u978.p2420==1)))) * !(EG(!(((i12.u276.p671==1)||(i17.u387.p943==1))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 11,0,1129.57,4317520,1,0,4.38748e+06,54661,21895,3.32632e+07,561,343176,10309784
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E(AF((i5.i1.i0.i1.u120.p301==1)) U ((((i29.u764.p1889==1)||(i3.u54.p130==1))||(i17.u371.p978==1))||(i43.i1.i1.i1.u1026.p2536==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!((i5.i1.i0.i1.u120.p301==1))))) * ((((i29.u764.p1889==1)||(i3.u54.p130==1))||(i17.u371.p978==1))||(i43.i1.i1.i1.u1026.p2536==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 12,0,1137.17,4317520,1,0,4.38748e+06,54830,22011,3.32632e+07,563,343964,10726090
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(((i33.u805.p1984==1)&&(i6.u168.p414==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((i33.u805.p1984==1)&&(i6.u168.p414==1))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 13,0,1140.38,4317520,1,0,4.38748e+06,54977,23059,3.32632e+07,575,344942,11018947
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(((AX((i37.u872.p2151==1)) + (i17.u378.p923==1)) + EF(((i22.u508.p1256==1)||(i32.i0.i0.i2.u752.p1862==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((i37.u872.p2151==1)))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i17.u378.p923==1))] != FALSE) + [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),TRUE) * ((i22.u508.p1256==1)||(i32.i0.i0.i2.u752.p1862==1)))] != FALSE)
(forward)formula 14,1,1140.56,4317520,1,0,4.38748e+06,55165,23063,3.32632e+07,575,345639,11025793
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((((i20.u484.p1191==1)||((i5.i0.i1.i0.u140.p330==1)&&(i23.u540.p1333==1)))||((i43.i0.i2.i1.u1022.p2525!=1)&&((i0.u174.p426==1)||(i39.u895.p2209==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((i20.u484.p1191==1)||((i5.i0.i1.i0.u140.p330==1)&&(i23.u540.p1333==1)))||((i43.i0.i2.i1.u1022.p2525!=1)&&((i0.u174.p426==1)||(i39.u895.p2209==1)))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 15,1,1140.59,4317520,1,0,4.38748e+06,55165,23088,3.32632e+07,575,345639,11029467
FORMULA CloudReconfiguration-PT-303-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************


BK_STOP 1589491751840

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//itstools/its-tools -data /home/mcc/execution/workspace -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/.eclipse -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx16000m -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Dosgi.requiredJavaVersion=1.6

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="CloudReconfiguration-PT-303"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is CloudReconfiguration-PT-303, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r051-ebro-158902545600020"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/CloudReconfiguration-PT-303.tgz
mv CloudReconfiguration-PT-303 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;