About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldPPPt-PT-030A
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
15742.590 | 3600000.00 | 3658258.00 | 8473.80 | TFTTTFFTTFFFT??? | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.r210-tajo-159033476100684.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-030A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r210-tajo-159033476100684
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 368K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 14 01:56 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 14 01:56 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 13 19:23 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 13 19:23 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 14 10:03 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 14 10:03 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 14 10:03 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 14 10:03 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 May 12 20:42 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 13 14:09 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 13 14:09 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K May 13 08:53 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 13 08:53 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 13 16:53 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 13 16:53 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 12 20:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 201K May 12 20:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1590612163568
[2020-05-27 20:42:45] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsminpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2020-05-27 20:42:45] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2020-05-27 20:42:45] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 78 ms
[2020-05-27 20:42:45] [INFO ] Transformed 753 places.
[2020-05-27 20:42:45] [INFO ] Transformed 543 transitions.
[2020-05-27 20:42:45] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2020-05-27 20:42:45] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 753 places and 543 transitions in 135 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 25 ms.
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 0 resets, run finished after 792 ms. (steps per millisecond=126 ) properties seen :[1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1]
// Phase 1: matrix 542 rows 753 cols
[2020-05-27 20:42:46] [INFO ] Computed 331 place invariants in 24 ms
[2020-05-27 20:42:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 162 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:42:46] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:42:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1041 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:42:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 47 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:42:48] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:42:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 188 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:42:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:42:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1125 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:42:49] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 52 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:42:58] [INFO ] Added : 538 causal constraints over 110 iterations in 8754 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:42:58] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 165 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:42:58] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:42:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1007 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:42:59] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 46 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:42:59] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:43:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 178 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:43:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1054 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:01] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 62 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:43:09] [INFO ] Added : 529 causal constraints over 108 iterations in 8269 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 185 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:09] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:43:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1055 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 42 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:43:11] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:43:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 182 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:43:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1173 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:12] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 38 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:43:19] [INFO ] Added : 528 causal constraints over 107 iterations in 6997 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 424 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:20] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:43:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 929 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:21] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 62 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:43:21] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:43:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 173 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:43:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1006 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:23] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 30 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:43:30] [INFO ] Added : 531 causal constraints over 107 iterations in 7626 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 182 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:30] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:43:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1218 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:32] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 61 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:43:32] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:43:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 226 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:43:33] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1127 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:34] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 43 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:43:41] [INFO ] Added : 523 causal constraints over 108 iterations in 7209 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 182 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:41] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:43:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1138 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:42] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 41 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:43:42] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:43:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 182 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:43:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1088 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:44] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 38 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:43:50] [INFO ] Added : 530 causal constraints over 108 iterations in 6562 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 212 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:51] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:43:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 857 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:52] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 33 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:43:52] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:43:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 159 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:43:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1150 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 52 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:43:59] [INFO ] Added : 533 causal constraints over 107 iterations in 5509 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 189 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:43:59] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:44:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1074 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:00] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 42 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:44:01] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:44:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 138 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:44:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 965 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:02] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 38 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:44:08] [INFO ] Added : 535 causal constraints over 108 iterations in 6523 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 203 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:09] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:44:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1103 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:10] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 30 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:44:10] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:44:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 181 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:44:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1114 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:12] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 30 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:44:19] [INFO ] Added : 528 causal constraints over 108 iterations in 7134 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 189 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:19] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:44:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1112 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:20] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 37 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:44:20] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:44:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 176 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:44:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1055 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:22] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 31 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:44:29] [INFO ] Added : 534 causal constraints over 110 iterations in 7551 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 153 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:30] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:44:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1029 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:31] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 44 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:44:31] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:44:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 178 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:44:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 974 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:32] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 38 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:44:39] [INFO ] Added : 528 causal constraints over 107 iterations in 6585 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 186 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:39] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:44:40] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1075 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:40] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 40 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:44:40] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:44:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 198 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:44:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1253 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:42] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 37 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:44:50] [INFO ] Added : 523 causal constraints over 105 iterations in 7536 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 222 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:50] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:44:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1229 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:51] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 44 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:44:51] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 20:44:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 331 positive place invariants in 181 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 20:44:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1304 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 20:44:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/1679/541 causal constraints in 33 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:44:59] [INFO ] Added : 514 causal constraints over 105 iterations in 5984 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 20:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 138 ms
[2020-05-27 20:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2020-05-27 20:45:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2020-05-27 20:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
Converted graph to binary with : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/convert-linux64, -i, /tmp/graph15314255605618850246.txt, -o, /tmp/graph15314255605618850246.bin, -w, /tmp/graph15314255605618850246.weights], workingDir=null]
Built communities with : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/louvain-linux64, /tmp/graph15314255605618850246.bin, -l, -1, -v, -w, /tmp/graph15314255605618850246.weights, -q, 0, -e, 0.001], workingDir=null]
[2020-05-27 20:45:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2020-05-27 20:45:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2020-05-27 20:45:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 90 redundant transitions.
[2020-05-27 20:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 109 ms
[2020-05-27 20:45:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 65 ms.
[2020-05-27 20:45:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal : 20 ms
[2020-05-27 20:45:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, --quiet, -i, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -ctl, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -ctl /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 16 CTL formulae.
built 28 ordering constraints for composite.
built 22 ordering constraints for composite.
built 17 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 19 ordering constraints for composite.
built 40 ordering constraints for composite.
built 18 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 25 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 18 ordering constraints for composite.
built 21 ordering constraints for composite.
built 21 ordering constraints for composite.
built 26 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 26 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 14 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 11 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 21 ordering constraints for composite.
built 14 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 14 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 25 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 11 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 14 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 25 ordering constraints for composite.
built 11 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 14 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 27 ordering constraints for composite.
built 11 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 19 ordering constraints for composite.
built 22 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 10 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 19 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 8 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 21 ordering constraints for composite.
built 19 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 19 ordering constraints for composite.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+108,17.702,502176,246,15,823645,405,1014,3.28722e+06,33,1769,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((i8.i2.i2.u100.p317==1)&&(i8.i2.i2.u100.p319==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((i8.i2.i2.u100.p317==1)&&(i8.i2.i2.u100.p319==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,17.7142,502176,1,0,823645,405,1035,3.28722e+06,40,1769,33
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EF(AG(((i11.i0.i0.u132.p417==1)&&(i11.i0.i0.u132.p419==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i11.i0.i0.u132.p417==1)&&(i11.i0.i0.u132.p419==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 1,0,17.8152,502176,1,0,823645,405,3822,3.28722e+06,131,1769,15466
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: (EG(EF(((i0.i0.i1.u7.p24==1)&&(i19.u236.p740==1)))) + EX((AX(((i13.i0.i1.u164.p516==1)&&(i12.i2.i1.u168.p527==1))) + AX(((i16.u210.p656==1)&&(i16.u213.p671==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((i0.i0.i1.u7.p24==1)&&(i19.u236.p740==1))))] != FALSE + ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(((i13.i0.i1.u164.p516==1)&&(i12.i2.i1.u168.p527==1))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(((i16.u210.p656==1)&&(i16.u213.p671==1))))))] != FALSE))
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 2,1,28.284,502176,1,0,823645,405,5377,3.28722e+06,140,1769,531863
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: (EF((EX((i1.u22.p72==1)) + AX(((i15.i1.i1.u202.p631==1)&&(i16.u205.p646==1))))) + (!(AF(((i9.i1.i2.u106.p331!=1)||(i9.i0.i1.u109.p346!=1)))) * !(EG(((i1.u18.p55==1)&&(i1.u22.p72==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(E(TRUE U (EX((i1.u22.p72==1)) + !(EX(!(((i15.i1.i1.u202.p631==1)&&(i16.u205.p646==1))))))))) * !(EG(!(((i9.i1.i2.u106.p331!=1)||(i9.i0.i1.u109.p346!=1))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG((Init * !(E(TRUE U (EX((i1.u22.p72==1)) + !(EX(!(((i15.i1.i1.u202.p631==1)&&(i16.u205.p646==1))))))))),((i1.u18.p55==1)&&(i1.u22.p72==1)))] = FALSE)
(forward)formula 3,1,28.3169,502176,1,0,823645,405,5428,3.28722e+06,142,1769,534332
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EF((((i15.i1.i1.u206.p647==1)||(((i9.i2.i0.u120.p376==1)&&(i1.u12.p41==1))&&(i0.i1.i0.u16.p52==1)))&&(((i13.i0.i1.u175.p549!=1)&&((i15.i1.i1.u201.p629!=1)||(i15.i1.i1.u206.p648!=1)))||(((i18.u221.p695!=1)||(i18.u227.p710!=1))&&((i1.u12.p40!=1)||(i1.u23.p74!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((i15.i1.i1.u206.p647==1)||(((i9.i2.i0.u120.p376==1)&&(i1.u12.p41==1))&&(i0.i1.i0.u16.p52==1)))&&(((i13.i0.i1.u175.p549!=1)&&((i15.i1.i1.u201.p629!=1)||(i15.i1.i1.u206.p648!=1)))||(((i18.u221.p695!=1)||(i18.u227.p710!=1))&&((i1.u12.p40!=1)||(i1.u23.p74!=1))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 4,1,28.3239,502176,1,0,823645,405,5478,3.28722e+06,143,1769,534568
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EF((AF(((i11.i0.i1.u140.p443==1)&&(i11.i0.i0.u143.p450==1))) * AG(((i7.u74.p232==1)&&(i7.u74.p234==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(((i11.i0.i1.u140.p443==1)&&(i11.i0.i0.u143.p450==1)))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i7.u74.p232==1)&&(i7.u74.p234==1))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 5,0,28.3262,502176,1,0,823645,405,5488,3.28722e+06,143,1769,534645
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: E(!(EX((i13.i0.i0.u174.p547==1))) U AX(((((i3.i1.i0.u42.p133==1)&&(i3.i0.i0.u47.p150==1))&&(i7.u75.p236==1))&&(i7.u77.p246==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EX((i13.i0.i0.u174.p547==1)))) * !(EX(!(((((i3.i1.i0.u42.p133==1)&&(i3.i0.i0.u47.p150==1))&&(i7.u75.p236==1))&&(i7.u77.p246==1))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 6,0,28.3409,502176,1,0,823645,405,5512,3.28722e+06,144,1769,535191
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: EF(EG(((i14.u185.p578==1)&&(i14.u192.p601==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((i14.u185.p578==1)&&(i14.u192.p601==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 7,1,28.3493,502176,1,0,823645,405,5546,3.28722e+06,144,1769,535559
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: E(!(AX(((i0.i0.i1.u0.p1==1)&&(i0.i0.i1.u7.p24==1)))) U (AF((i14.u192.p601==1)) * ((((i5.u68.p217!=1)||(i5.u68.p219!=1))||(i11.i2.i2.u146.p455!=1))||(i11.i2.i1.u150.p472!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!(((i0.i0.i1.u0.p1==1)&&(i0.i0.i1.u7.p24==1))))))) * ((((i5.u68.p217!=1)||(i5.u68.p219!=1))||(i11.i2.i2.u146.p455!=1))||(i11.i2.i1.u150.p472!=1))) * !(EG(!((i14.u192.p601==1)))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 8,1,28.3632,502176,1,0,823645,405,5592,3.28722e+06,144,1769,536211
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EX(((AG(((i4.i1.i1.u58.p183==1)&&(i4.i1.i2.u63.p200==1))) + EX(((i11.i0.i1.u140.p441==1)&&(i11.i1.i1.u144.p452==1)))) + !(EF(((i0.i1.i0.u9.p29==1)&&(i0.i1.i0.u14.p48==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i4.i1.i1.u58.p183==1)&&(i4.i1.i2.u63.p200==1))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(EY(Init)) * ((i11.i0.i1.u140.p441==1)&&(i11.i1.i1.u144.p452==1)))] != FALSE) + [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ((i0.i1.i0.u9.p29==1)&&(i0.i1.i0.u14.p48==1)))))] != FALSE)
(forward)formula 9,0,28.3704,502176,1,0,823645,405,5626,3.28722e+06,144,1769,537410
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: AG(AF(((i12.i1.i1.u156.p492!=1)||(i12.i1.i1.u156.p494!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((i12.i1.i1.u156.p492!=1)||(i12.i1.i1.u156.p494!=1))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 10,0,28.3772,502176,1,0,823645,405,5667,3.28722e+06,145,1769,537757
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: (AG(AF(((i9.i1.i0.u105.p329!=1)||(i9.i1.i0.u110.p348!=1)))) * (!(A(((i0.i1.i2.u10.p33==1)&&(i0.i0.i3.u15.p50==1)) U ((i12.i0.i0.u155.p486==1)&&(i12.i2.i0.u157.p496==1)))) + EX((((i19.u236.p741!=1)||(i19.u240.p752!=1))&&((i11.i0.i0.u132.p418!=1)||(i10.i0.i2.u135.p425!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((i9.i1.i0.u105.p329!=1)||(i9.i1.i0.u110.p348!=1))))] = FALSE * [(((Init * !(EX((((i19.u236.p741!=1)||(i19.u240.p752!=1))&&((i11.i0.i0.u132.p418!=1)||(i10.i0.i2.u135.p425!=1)))))) * !(EG(!(((i12.i0.i0.u155.p486==1)&&(i12.i2.i0.u157.p496==1)))))) * !(E(!(((i12.i0.i0.u155.p486==1)&&(i12.i2.i0.u157.p496==1))) U (!(((i0.i1.i2.u10.p33==1)&&(i0.i0.i3.u15.p50==1))) * !(((i12.i0.i0.u155.p486==1)&&(i12.i2.i0.u157.p496==1)))))))] = FALSE)
(forward)formula 11,0,28.4031,502176,1,0,823645,405,5781,3.28722e+06,146,1769,539271
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: EF((((i1.u18.p58==1)&&(i1.u23.p75==1))||((i10.i1.i2.u130.p407==1)&&(i10.i1.i2.u130.p409==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((i1.u18.p58==1)&&(i1.u23.p75==1))||((i10.i1.i2.u130.p407==1)&&(i10.i1.i2.u130.p409==1))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 12,1,28.4044,502176,1,0,823645,405,5797,3.28722e+06,146,1769,539327
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2020-05-27 21:05:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2020-05-27 21:05:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2020-05-27 21:05:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2020-05-27 21:05:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2020-05-27 21:05:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 180 redundant transitions.
[2020-05-27 21:05:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 135 ms
[2020-05-27 21:05:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2020-05-27 21:05:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal : 11 ms
[2020-05-27 21:05:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, --quiet, -i, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -ctl, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -ctl /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
built 331 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 4 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+108,6.22644,210448,492,5,466187,830,1475,696936,12,638,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((!(EF((u14.p24==1))) + ((u26.p45==1)&&(i19.u461.p60==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U (u14.p24==1))) + ((u26.p45==1)&&(i19.u461.p60==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 101
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 102
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 103
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 104
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 105
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 106
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 108
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 109
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 110
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 111
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 112
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 113
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 114
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 116
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 117
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 118
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 119
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 120
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 123
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 124
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 125
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 126
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 127
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 128
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 130
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 131
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 132
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 133
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 134
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 135
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 136
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 137
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 138
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 139
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 140
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 141
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 142
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 143
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 144
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 145
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 146
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 147
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 148
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 149
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 150
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 151
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 152
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 153
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 154
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 155
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 156
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 157
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 158
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 159
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 160
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 161
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 162
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 163
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 164
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 165
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 166
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 167
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 168
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 169
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 170
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 171
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 172
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 173
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 174
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 175
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 176
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 177
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 178
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 179
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 180
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 181
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 182
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 183
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 184
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 185
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 186
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 187
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 188
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 189
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 190
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 191
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 192
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 193
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 194
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 195
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 196
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 197
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 198
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 199
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 200
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 201
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 202
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 203
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 204
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 205
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 206
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 207
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 208
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 209
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 210
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 211
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 212
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 213
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 214
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 215
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 216
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 217
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 218
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 219
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 220
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 221
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 222
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 223
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 224
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 225
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 226
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 227
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 228
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 229
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 230
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 231
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 232
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 233
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 234
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 235
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 236
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 237
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 238
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 239
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 240
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 241
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2020-05-27 21:26:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 88 ms
[2020-05-27 21:26:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 542 transitions.
[2020-05-27 21:26:29] [INFO ] Transformed 753 places.
[2020-05-27 21:26:29] [INFO ] Transformed 542 transitions.
Running greatSPN : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn//bin/pinvar, /home/mcc/execution/gspn], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2, /home/mcc/execution/gspn, -META, -varord-only], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2020-05-27 21:26:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal : 4 ms
[2020-05-27 21:26:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, --quiet, -i, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -ctl, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl, --load-order, /home/mcc/execution/model.ord, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -ctl /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl --load-order /home/mcc/execution/model.ord --gen-order FOLLOW
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+108,2.66301,88304,2,5201,5,377016,6,0,3556,491294,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((!(EF((p24==1))) + ((p45==1)&&(p60==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U (p24==1))) + ((p45==1)&&(p60==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//itstools/its-tools -data /home/mcc/execution/workspace -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/.eclipse -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx16000m -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Dosgi.requiredJavaVersion=1.6
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-030A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-030A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r210-tajo-159033476100684"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-030A.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-030A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;