About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldIIPt-PT-050A
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
15742.950 | 3600000.00 | 3660450.00 | 8001.80 | TFTTTFTFFT?????? | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.r210-tajo-159033475600364.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-050A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r210-tajo-159033475600364
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 428K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K May 14 01:21 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 14 01:21 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 13 18:44 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 13 18:44 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 14 10:02 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 14 10:02 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 14 10:02 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 14 10:02 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 May 12 20:42 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 13 13:41 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 13 13:41 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 13 08:24 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 13 08:24 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 13 16:53 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 13 16:53 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 12 20:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 265K May 12 20:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1590586482005
[2020-05-27 13:34:44] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsminpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2020-05-27 13:34:44] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2020-05-27 13:34:44] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 110 ms
[2020-05-27 13:34:44] [INFO ] Transformed 953 places.
[2020-05-27 13:34:44] [INFO ] Transformed 703 transitions.
[2020-05-27 13:34:44] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2020-05-27 13:34:44] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 953 places and 703 transitions in 173 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 25 ms.
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 0 resets, run finished after 1161 ms. (steps per millisecond=86 ) properties seen :[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0]
// Phase 1: matrix 702 rows 953 cols
[2020-05-27 13:34:45] [INFO ] Computed 451 place invariants in 26 ms
[2020-05-27 13:34:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 293 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:34:46] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:34:48] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1708 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:34:48] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 50 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:34:48] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:34:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 275 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:34:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:34:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1495 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:34:50] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 44 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:35:04] [INFO ] Added : 698 causal constraints over 140 iterations in 14063 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 293 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:04] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:35:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1869 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:06] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 56 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:35:07] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:35:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 278 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:35:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1808 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 69 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:35:26] [INFO ] Added : 696 causal constraints over 142 iterations in 17553 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 275 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:27] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:35:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1664 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:29] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:35:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 279 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:35:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1712 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:31] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 65 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:35:46] [INFO ] Added : 692 causal constraints over 141 iterations in 15665 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 283 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:47] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:35:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1735 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:49] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 43 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:35:49] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:35:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 292 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:35:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1857 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:35:51] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 52 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:36:09] [INFO ] Added : 695 causal constraints over 140 iterations in 17664 ms. Result :(error "Solver has unexpectedly terminated")
[2020-05-27 13:36:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 286 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:09] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:36:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1655 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 55 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:36:11] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:36:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 290 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:36:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1717 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:13] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 55 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:36:31] [INFO ] Added : 694 causal constraints over 142 iterations in 17807 ms. Result :unknown
[2020-05-27 13:36:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 286 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:32] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:36:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1603 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:33] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 31 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:36:34] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:36:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 272 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:36:36] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1593 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:36] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 54 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:36:49] [INFO ] Added : 699 causal constraints over 143 iterations in 13622 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 277 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:50] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:36:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1625 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:51] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:36:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 269 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:36:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1524 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:36:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 52 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:37:06] [INFO ] Added : 693 causal constraints over 140 iterations in 12776 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 229 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:07] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:37:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1853 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 42 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:37:09] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:37:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 221 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:37:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1676 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 57 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:37:26] [INFO ] Added : 690 causal constraints over 139 iterations in 15381 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 319 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:27] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:37:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1710 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:28] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 51 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:37:28] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:37:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 285 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:37:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1666 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:31] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 49 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:37:47] [INFO ] Added : 698 causal constraints over 141 iterations in 16437 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:48] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 314 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:48] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:37:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1810 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:50] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 33 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:37:50] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:37:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 284 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:37:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1667 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:37:52] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 102 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:38:05] [INFO ] Added : 696 causal constraints over 142 iterations in 13376 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 275 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:06] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:38:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1576 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 70 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:38:07] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:38:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 199 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:38:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1536 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 39 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:38:22] [INFO ] Added : 695 causal constraints over 140 iterations in 13027 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 292 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:23] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:38:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1462 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:24] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:38:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 279 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:38:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1625 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:26] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 32 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:38:41] [INFO ] Added : 692 causal constraints over 140 iterations in 14230 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 287 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:41] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:38:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1714 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:43] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 45 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:38:43] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:38:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 219 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:38:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1649 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:38:45] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 51 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:39:03] [INFO ] Added : 699 causal constraints over 142 iterations in 17656 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 298 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:03] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:39:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1698 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:05] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 44 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:39:05] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:39:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 296 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:39:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1673 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 66 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:39:25] [INFO ] Added : 690 causal constraints over 143 iterations in 17818 ms. Result :unknown
[2020-05-27 13:39:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 303 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:26] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:39:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1668 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:27] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 41 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:39:28] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:39:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 290 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:39:30] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1691 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:30] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 60 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:39:44] [INFO ] Added : 679 causal constraints over 139 iterations in 14133 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 283 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:44] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:39:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1637 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:46] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 44 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:39:46] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:39:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 292 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:39:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1784 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:39:49] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 54 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:40:05] [INFO ] Added : 695 causal constraints over 140 iterations in 16031 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 290 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:05] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:40:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1615 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:07] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:40:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 269 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:40:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1782 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 55 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:40:23] [INFO ] Added : 691 causal constraints over 140 iterations in 14301 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 277 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:24] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:40:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1452 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:25] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 51 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:40:25] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:40:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 278 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:40:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1886 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:28] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 61 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:40:44] [INFO ] Added : 696 causal constraints over 143 iterations in 16450 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 276 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:45] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:40:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1574 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:46] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 56 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:40:47] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:40:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 284 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:40:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1887 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:40:49] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 51 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:41:04] [INFO ] Added : 698 causal constraints over 142 iterations in 14977 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 250 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:04] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:41:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1450 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:06] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:41:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 224 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:41:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1827 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:08] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 54 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:41:23] [INFO ] Added : 698 causal constraints over 142 iterations in 14379 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 589 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:24] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:41:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1564 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:25] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:41:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 297 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:41:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1635 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:27] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 55 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:41:43] [INFO ] Added : 692 causal constraints over 139 iterations in 15621 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 264 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:43] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:41:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1637 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:45] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 43 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:41:45] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:41:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 248 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:41:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1488 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:41:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 43 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:42:01] [INFO ] Added : 694 causal constraints over 139 iterations in 13565 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 281 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:01] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:42:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1600 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:03] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 61 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:42:03] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:42:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 283 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:42:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1653 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:05] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 51 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:42:21] [INFO ] Added : 698 causal constraints over 142 iterations in 15759 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 294 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:21] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:42:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1881 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:23] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 49 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:42:23] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:42:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 272 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:42:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1720 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:26] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 57 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:42:41] [INFO ] Added : 695 causal constraints over 140 iterations in 15190 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 202 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:41] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:42:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1821 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:43] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 43 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:42:43] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:42:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 289 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:42:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1937 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:42:46] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 37 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:43:03] [INFO ] Added : 693 causal constraints over 139 iterations in 17200 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:43:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 290 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:43:03] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:43:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1786 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:43:05] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 37 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:43:05] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:43:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 231 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:43:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:43:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1533 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:43:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 51 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:43:24] [INFO ] Added : 695 causal constraints over 140 iterations in 16863 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:43:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 305 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:43:25] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:43:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1666 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:43:26] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 13:43:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 451 positive place invariants in 321 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:43:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 13:43:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1837 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 13:43:29] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 701/2499/701 causal constraints in 46 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:43:43] [INFO ] Added : 682 causal constraints over 137 iterations in 14080 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 13:43:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 420 ms
[2020-05-27 13:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 190 ms
[2020-05-27 13:43:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2020-05-27 13:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
Converted graph to binary with : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/convert-linux64, -i, /tmp/graph745970958408431695.txt, -o, /tmp/graph745970958408431695.bin, -w, /tmp/graph745970958408431695.weights], workingDir=null]
Built communities with : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/louvain-linux64, /tmp/graph745970958408431695.bin, -l, -1, -v, -w, /tmp/graph745970958408431695.weights, -q, 0, -e, 0.001], workingDir=null]
[2020-05-27 13:43:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2020-05-27 13:43:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2020-05-27 13:43:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 150 redundant transitions.
[2020-05-27 13:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 155 ms
[2020-05-27 13:43:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 48 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:43:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal : 26 ms
[2020-05-27 13:43:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, --quiet, -i, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -ctl, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -ctl /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 16 CTL formulae.
built 28 ordering constraints for composite.
built 21 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 38 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 38 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 20 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 38 ordering constraints for composite.
built 20 ordering constraints for composite.
built 38 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 38 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 38 ordering constraints for composite.
built 20 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 20 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 20 ordering constraints for composite.
built 23 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 20 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 14 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.07407e+140,0.747323,25716,216,15,40419,595,976,71628,31,3504,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF((i9.i1.i3.u141.p337==1)) + AX(EF(((i22.i1.i0.u330.p785==1)&&(i22.i1.i3.u333.p794==1))))) + EF(((i16.i0.i2.u237.p565==1)&&(i16.i0.i2.u243.p580==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((i16.i0.i2.u237.p565==1)&&(i16.i0.i2.u243.p580==1))))) * !(!(EG(!((i9.i1.i3.u141.p337==1))))))) * !(E(TRUE U ((i22.i1.i0.u330.p785==1)&&(i22.i1.i3.u333.p794==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.836211,25716,1,0,40419,595,3891,71628,118,3504,27183
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EG(!(EF(((i8.i0.i3.u108.p259==1)&&(i8.i0.i3.u119.p284==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U ((i8.i0.i3.u108.p259==1)&&(i8.i0.i3.u119.p284==1)))))] != FALSE
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
(forward)formula 1,0,0.852197,25716,1,0,40419,595,4080,71628,120,3504,29353
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: EF(((i1.i0.i2.u10.p26==1)&&(i1.i0.i2.u10.p28==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((i1.i0.i2.u10.p26==1)&&(i1.i0.i2.u10.p28==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 2,1,0.852715,25716,1,0,40419,595,4100,71628,124,3504,29420
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: E(((((i20.u315.p752==1)&&(i21.u317.p756==1))&&(i21.u320.p762==1))||((i22.i0.i2.u327.p778!=1)&&((i20.u298.p710!=1)||(i20.u298.p712!=1)))) U EF(((i22.i1.i0.u330.p787==1)&&(i22.i1.i2.u335.p798==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,((((i20.u315.p752==1)&&(i21.u317.p756==1))&&(i21.u320.p762==1))||((i22.i0.i2.u327.p778!=1)&&((i20.u298.p710!=1)||(i20.u298.p712!=1))))),TRUE) * ((i22.i1.i0.u330.p787==1)&&(i22.i1.i2.u335.p798==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 3,1,1.27004,32436,1,0,54676,595,5512,97628,133,3621,117836
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EF((((i18.u269.p641==1)&&(i13.u194.p461==1))&&(i13.u198.p472==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((i18.u269.p641==1)&&(i13.u194.p461==1))&&(i13.u198.p472==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 4,1,1.27097,32964,1,0,54704,595,5525,97659,133,3621,117896
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EG(AG((((i11.u169.p402!=1)||(i11.u176.p419!=1))&&((i14.i0.i2.u201.p478!=1)||(i14.i0.i2.u208.p495!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((((i11.u169.p402!=1)||(i11.u176.p419!=1))&&((i14.i0.i2.u201.p478!=1)||(i14.i0.i2.u208.p495!=1)))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 5,0,1.27397,32964,1,0,54884,595,5543,97894,133,3621,118392
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: EF((((((i5.u91.p220==1)&&(i6.i0.i3.u93.p224==1))&&(i6.i0.i1.u96.p230==1))||((i6.i0.i0.u84.p202==1)&&(i6.i0.i0.u95.p227==1)))||(((i18.u271.p645==1)&&(i27.i1.i0.u388.p924==1))&&(i27.i1.i0.u399.p949==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((((i5.u91.p220==1)&&(i6.i0.i3.u93.p224==1))&&(i6.i0.i1.u96.p230==1))||((i6.i0.i0.u84.p202==1)&&(i6.i0.i0.u95.p227==1)))||(((i18.u271.p645==1)&&(i27.i1.i0.u388.p924==1))&&(i27.i1.i0.u399.p949==1))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 6,1,1.27561,32964,1,0,54985,595,5595,98073,133,3621,118504
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: AG((((((!(AF((i8.i1.i0.u127.p303==1))) + (i17.i0.i2.u250.p597!=1)) + (i17.i0.i0.u255.p608!=1)) + (i16.i0.i0.u228.p544!=1)) + (i16.i0.i0.u239.p569!=1)) + ((i9.i1.i1.u142.p339!=1)&&((i2.u34.p83!=1)||(i2.u34.p85!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((i9.i1.i1.u142.p339!=1)&&((i2.u34.p83!=1)||(i2.u34.p85!=1))))) * !((i16.i0.i0.u239.p569!=1))) * !((i16.i0.i0.u228.p544!=1))) * !((i17.i0.i0.u255.p608!=1))) * !((i17.i0.i2.u250.p597!=1))) * !(EG(!((i8.i1.i0.u127.p303==1)))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 7,0,1.28046,33228,1,0,55630,595,5648,99085,135,3622,119095
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: E(((i17.i0.i1.u256.p609==1)||((i25.u367.p873!=1)&&((i15.i1.i2.u226.p540!=1)||(i15.i1.i1.u231.p551!=1)))) U ((i8.i0.i2.u114.p273==1)&&(i8.i0.i2.u114.p275==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((i17.i0.i1.u256.p609==1)||((i25.u367.p873!=1)&&((i15.i1.i2.u226.p540!=1)||(i15.i1.i1.u231.p551!=1))))) * ((i8.i0.i2.u114.p273==1)&&(i8.i0.i2.u114.p275==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 8,0,1.29035,33228,1,0,56339,595,5712,100706,135,3622,120534
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: EF(((i8.i0.i1.u117.p280==1) + EF((((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i0.u5.p15==1))&&(i21.u318.p757==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i8.i0.i1.u117.p280==1))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),TRUE) * (((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i0.u5.p15==1))&&(i21.u318.p757==1)))] != FALSE)
(forward)formula 9,1,1.29093,33756,1,0,56362,595,5715,100731,135,3622,120585
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-050A-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2020-05-27 14:06:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2020-05-27 14:06:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2020-05-27 14:06:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2020-05-27 14:06:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2020-05-27 14:06:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 200 redundant transitions.
[2020-05-27 14:06:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 66 ms
[2020-05-27 14:06:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 45 ms.
[2020-05-27 14:06:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal : 13 ms
[2020-05-27 14:06:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, --quiet, -i, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -ctl, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -ctl /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
built 451 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.07407e+140,12.5385,435540,814,5,981868,1369,2032,1.5172e+06,12,995,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(((i250.u314.p595!=1)||(u318.p604!=1))) U E((((u417.p792==1)&&(u420.p798==1))&&(u421.p800==1)) U ((i322.u404.p766==1)&&(u408.p775==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,EG(((i250.u314.p595!=1)||(u318.p604!=1)))),(((u417.p792==1)&&(u420.p798==1))&&(u421.p800==1))) * ((i322.u404.p766==1)&&(u408.p775==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 101
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 102
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 103
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 104
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 105
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 106
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 108
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 109
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 110
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 111
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 112
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 113
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 114
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 116
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 117
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 118
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 119
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 120
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 121
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 123
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 124
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 125
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 126
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 127
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 128
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 130
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 131
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 132
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 133
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 134
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 135
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 136
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 137
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 138
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 139
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 140
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 141
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 142
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 143
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 144
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 145
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 146
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 147
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 148
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 149
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 150
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 151
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 152
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 153
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 154
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 155
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 156
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 157
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 158
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 159
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 160
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 161
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 162
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 163
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 164
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 165
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 166
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 167
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 168
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 169
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 170
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 171
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 172
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 173
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 174
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 175
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 176
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 177
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 178
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 179
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 180
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 181
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 182
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 183
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 184
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 185
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 186
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 187
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 188
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 189
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 190
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 191
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 192
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 193
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 194
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 195
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 196
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 197
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 198
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 199
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 201
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 202
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 203
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 204
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 205
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 206
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 207
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 208
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 209
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 210
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 211
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 212
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 213
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 214
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 215
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 216
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 217
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 218
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 219
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 220
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 221
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 222
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 223
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 225
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 226
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 227
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 228
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 229
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 230
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 231
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 233
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 234
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 235
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 236
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 237
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 238
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 239
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 241
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 242
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 243
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 244
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 245
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 246
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 248
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 249
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 251
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 252
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 253
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 254
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 256
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 257
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 258
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 260
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 261
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 262
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 264
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 265
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 267
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 268
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 269
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 270
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 271
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 273
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 275
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 276
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 277
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 278
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 279
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 281
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 283
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 284
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 285
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 286
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 287
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 289
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 291
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 292
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 293
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 295
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 296
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 297
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 299
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 300
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 302
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 303
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 304
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 305
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 307
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 308
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 310
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 311
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 312
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 313
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 314
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 316
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 318
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 319
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 320
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 321
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 322
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 323
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 325
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 326
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 328
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 329
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 331
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 332
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 333
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 335
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 336
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 338
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 339
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 340
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 341
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 342
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 344
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 346
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 347
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 348
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 349
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 350
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 352
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 353
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 355
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 356
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 357
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 358
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 359
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 361
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 362
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 365
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 366
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 367
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 368
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 370
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 372
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 374
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 377
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 378
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 381
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 383
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 384
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 385
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 386
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 387
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 388
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 389
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 390
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 391
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 392
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 393
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 394
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 395
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 396
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 397
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 398
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 399
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 400
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 401
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2020-05-27 14:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2020-05-27 14:29:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 702 transitions.
[2020-05-27 14:29:44] [INFO ] Transformed 953 places.
[2020-05-27 14:29:44] [INFO ] Transformed 702 transitions.
Running greatSPN : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn//bin/pinvar, /home/mcc/execution/gspn], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2, /home/mcc/execution/gspn, -META, -varord-only], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2020-05-27 14:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal : 9 ms
[2020-05-27 14:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, --quiet, -i, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -ctl, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl, --load-order, /home/mcc/execution/model.ord, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -ctl /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl --load-order /home/mcc/execution/model.ord --gen-order FOLLOW
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.07407e+140,3.44505,85096,2,13824,5,336349,6,0,4516,389109,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(((p595!=1)||(p604!=1))) U E((((p792==1)&&(p798==1))&&(p800==1)) U ((p766==1)&&(p775==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,EG(((p595!=1)||(p604!=1)))),(((p792==1)&&(p798==1))&&(p800==1))) * ((p766==1)&&(p775==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//itstools/its-tools -data /home/mcc/execution/workspace -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/.eclipse -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx16000m -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Dosgi.requiredJavaVersion=1.6
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-050A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-050A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r210-tajo-159033475600364"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-050A.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-050A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;