About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldIIPt-PT-030A
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 15741.950 | 3600000.00 | 3667162.00 | 5074.50 | TTTTTFTFFFT????? | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.r210-tajo-159033475600332.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2020-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-030A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r210-tajo-159033475600332
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 324K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.1K May 14 01:11 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 14 01:11 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K May 13 18:26 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 13 18:26 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K May 14 10:02 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K May 14 10:02 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K May 14 10:02 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 14 10:02 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 May 12 20:42 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K May 13 13:35 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 13 13:35 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.7K May 13 08:09 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 13 08:09 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 13 16:53 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 13 16:53 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 12 20:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 159K May 12 20:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1590583267597
[2020-05-27 12:41:09] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsminpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2020-05-27 12:41:09] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2020-05-27 12:41:09] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 76 ms
[2020-05-27 12:41:09] [INFO ] Transformed 573 places.
[2020-05-27 12:41:09] [INFO ] Transformed 423 transitions.
[2020-05-27 12:41:09] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2020-05-27 12:41:09] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 573 places and 423 transitions in 118 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 19 ms.
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 0 resets, run finished after 609 ms. (steps per millisecond=164 ) properties seen :[1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0]
// Phase 1: matrix 422 rows 573 cols
[2020-05-27 12:41:10] [INFO ] Computed 271 place invariants in 16 ms
[2020-05-27 12:41:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 141 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:10] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 636 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 29 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:41:11] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:41:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 97 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 492 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:12] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 21 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:41:16] [INFO ] Added : 404 causal constraints over 81 iterations in 4289 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 93 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:16] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 529 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:17] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:41:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 131 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 762 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:18] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 32 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:41:22] [INFO ] Added : 416 causal constraints over 86 iterations in 4201 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 137 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:22] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 764 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:23] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 34 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:41:23] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:41:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 133 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 705 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:24] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 33 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:41:28] [INFO ] Added : 412 causal constraints over 85 iterations in 3704 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 131 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:28] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 711 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:29] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 33 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:41:29] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:41:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 131 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:30] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 745 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:30] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 73 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:41:37] [INFO ] Added : 421 causal constraints over 87 iterations in 6875 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 138 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:37] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:38] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 813 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:38] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:41:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 98 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 900 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:39] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 34 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:41:44] [INFO ] Added : 415 causal constraints over 84 iterations in 5058 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 142 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:44] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 580 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:45] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 38 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:41:45] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:41:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 240 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1782 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 31 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:41:52] [INFO ] Added : 420 causal constraints over 86 iterations in 5021 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 96 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:53] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 527 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:53] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:41:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 131 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:41:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 726 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:41:54] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 29 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:41:59] [INFO ] Added : 413 causal constraints over 88 iterations in 5362 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 94 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:00] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 572 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:00] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 37 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:00] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:42:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 135 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 746 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:02] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 37 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:05] [INFO ] Added : 419 causal constraints over 85 iterations in 3935 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 176 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:06] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 728 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 27 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:07] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:42:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 133 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 664 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 23 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:11] [INFO ] Added : 414 causal constraints over 86 iterations in 3642 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 131 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:11] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 736 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:12] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:42:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 132 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 759 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:13] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 29 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:18] [INFO ] Added : 413 causal constraints over 84 iterations in 4415 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 130 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:18] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 689 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:19] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 38 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:19] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:42:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 133 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 700 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:20] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 24 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:25] [INFO ] Added : 415 causal constraints over 86 iterations in 4941 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 131 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:25] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 780 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:26] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 34 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:26] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:42:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 130 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 667 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:27] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 32 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:30] [INFO ] Added : 413 causal constraints over 83 iterations in 3535 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 125 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:31] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 731 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:31] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:42:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 128 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 716 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:32] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 35 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:37] [INFO ] Added : 418 causal constraints over 85 iterations in 4865 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 132 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:37] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:38] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 727 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:38] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 27 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:38] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:42:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 118 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 586 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:39] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 26 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:42] [INFO ] Added : 408 causal constraints over 83 iterations in 3253 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 127 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:43] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 677 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:43] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 21 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:43] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:42:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 129 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 562 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:44] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 35 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:49] [INFO ] Added : 420 causal constraints over 86 iterations in 4296 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 54 ms returned unsat
[2020-05-27 12:42:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 145 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:49] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 689 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:50] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:42:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 134 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1298 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:51] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 30 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:42:55] [INFO ] Added : 413 causal constraints over 83 iterations in 4179 ms. Result :sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 138 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:56] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 688 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:56] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-05-27 12:42:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 271 positive place invariants in 168 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-05-27 12:42:58] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 1348 ms returned sat
[2020-05-27 12:42:58] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 421/1499/421 causal constraints in 32 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:43:04] [INFO ] Added : 420 causal constraints over 86 iterations in 6298 ms. Result :sat
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 1 simplifications.
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 157 ms
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
Converted graph to binary with : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/convert-linux64, -i, /tmp/graph18137033462727257432.txt, -o, /tmp/graph18137033462727257432.bin, -w, /tmp/graph18137033462727257432.weights], workingDir=null]
Built communities with : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/louvain-linux64, /tmp/graph18137033462727257432.bin, -l, -1, -v, -w, /tmp/graph18137033462727257432.weights, -q, 0, -e, 0.001], workingDir=null]
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 90 redundant transitions.
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 80 ms
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 41 ms.
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal : 14 ms
[2020-05-27 12:43:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, --quiet, -i, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -ctl, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -ctl /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.
built 30 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 20 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 20 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 20 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 16 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 14 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 6 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 15 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 5 ordering constraints for composite.
built 9 ordering constraints for composite.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.06499e+84,0.455506,16712,148,15,24025,473,612,42921,31,2287,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((i12.i2.u98.p233==1)&&(i12.i1.u102.p244==1)) + AG(((i3.i0.u20.p50==1)&&(i3.i0.u31.p75==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((i12.i2.u98.p233==1)&&(i12.i1.u102.p244==1)))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i3.i0.u20.p50==1)&&(i3.i0.u31.p75==1))))))] != FALSE)
(forward)formula 0,1,0.457099,17096,1,0,24025,473,624,42921,34,2287,52
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: (AX(((((i3.i2.u26.p63==1)&&(i3.i3.u29.p72==1))||(i15.i3.u116.p278!=1))||(i15.i3.u127.p303!=1))) * EF((((i22.i1.u172.p412==1)&&(i21.u175.p418==1))&&(i21.u176.p420==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(((((i3.i2.u26.p63==1)&&(i3.i3.u29.p72==1))||(i15.i3.u116.p278!=1))||(i15.i3.u127.p303!=1))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U (((i22.i1.u172.p412==1)&&(i21.u175.p418==1))&&(i21.u176.p420==1)))))] = FALSE)
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 1,1,0.516781,17096,1,0,24025,473,2667,42921,121,2287,14485
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: (AG(((((i15.i1.u125.p299==1)&&(i15.i1.u131.p314==1))&&(i28.i2.u233.p554==1))&&(i28.i2.u240.p571==1))) + EF(((i10.i1.u81.p193==1)&&(i10.i1.u88.p210==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((i10.i1.u81.p193==1)&&(i10.i1.u88.p210==1))))),TRUE) * !(((((i15.i1.u125.p299==1)&&(i15.i1.u131.p314==1))&&(i28.i2.u233.p554==1))&&(i28.i2.u240.p571==1))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 2,1,0.524496,17096,1,0,24025,473,2694,42921,121,2287,15927
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: (EG(((i3.i3.u29.p71==1)&&(((i5.i0.u42.p101==1)&&(i5.i1.u45.p110==1))||((i27.i0.u212.p506==1)&&(i27.i0.u223.p531==1))))) + EF((i21.u175.p417==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,((i3.i3.u29.p71==1)&&(((i5.i0.u42.p101==1)&&(i5.i1.u45.p110==1))||((i27.i0.u212.p506==1)&&(i27.i0.u223.p531==1)))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i21.u175.p417==1))] != FALSE)
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
(forward)formula 3,1,0.535923,17096,1,0,24025,473,2993,42921,125,2287,16516
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: E(AX(((((i27.i1.u217.p517==1)&&(i27.i3.u222.p530==1))&&(i21.u170.p405==1))&&(i21.u173.p414==1))) U EF((i8.u72.p172==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(EX(!(((((i27.i1.u217.p517==1)&&(i27.i3.u222.p530==1))&&(i21.u170.p405==1))&&(i21.u173.p414==1)))))),TRUE) * (i8.u72.p172==1))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 4,1,0.82431,21056,1,0,31982,473,3729,59715,129,2287,62225
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EF(((EX(((((i0.i2.u2.p7==1)&&(i0.i2.u2.p9==1))&&(i6.i0.u50.p121==1))&&(i6.i0.u50.p123==1))) * EG(((i15.i2.u122.p293==1)&&(i15.i3.u127.p304==1)))) * AX((i14.i2.u117.p280==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (EX(((((i0.i2.u2.p7==1)&&(i0.i2.u2.p9==1))&&(i6.i0.u50.p121==1))&&(i6.i0.u50.p123==1))) * EG(((i15.i2.u122.p293==1)&&(i15.i3.u127.p304==1))))) * !(EX(!((i14.i2.u117.p280==1)))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 5,0,0.82637,21320,1,0,32311,473,3733,60228,129,2287,62519
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: ((AX(EF(((i12.i1.u97.p231==1)&&(i12.i1.u104.p248==1)))) + A(((i3.i1.u25.p61!=1)||(i3.i2.u30.p74!=1)) U (((((i21.u170.p404==1)&&(i21.u174.p415==1))&&(i11.i2.u84.p203==1))&&(i10.i0.u87.p209==1))&&(i10.i1.u88.p211==1)))) + AX((((i9.i2.u74.p178==1)&&(i9.i2.u74.p180==1))||((i18.i0.u140.p335==1)&&(i18.i0.u151.p360==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !((!(EX(!(E(TRUE U ((i12.i1.u97.p231==1)&&(i12.i1.u104.p248==1)))))) + !((E(!((((((i21.u170.p404==1)&&(i21.u174.p415==1))&&(i11.i2.u84.p203==1))&&(i10.i0.u87.p209==1))&&(i10.i1.u88.p211==1))) U (!(((i3.i1.u25.p61!=1)||(i3.i2.u30.p74!=1))) * !((((((i21.u170.p404==1)&&(i21.u174.p415==1))&&(i11.i2.u84.p203==1))&&(i10.i0.u87.p209==1))&&(i10.i1.u88.p211==1))))) + EG(!((((((i21.u170.p404==1)&&(i21.u174.p415==1))&&(i11.i2.u84.p203==1))&&(i10.i0.u87.p209==1))&&(i10.i1.u88.p211==1)))))))))) * !((((i9.i2.u74.p178==1)&&(i9.i2.u74.p180==1))||((i18.i0.u140.p335==1)&&(i18.i0.u151.p360==1)))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 6,1,0.93847,27128,1,0,45405,473,3847,90963,134,2287,74992
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: AG(((((((i16.i2.u139.p334==1)&&(i17.i2.u141.p338==1))&&(i17.i1.u144.p344==1))||((i4.i0.u39.p94==1)&&(i7.i0.u61.p147==1)))||(i23.i0.u186.p443!=1))||(i23.i3.u189.p452!=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((((((i16.i2.u139.p334==1)&&(i17.i2.u141.p338==1))&&(i17.i1.u144.p344==1))||((i4.i0.u39.p94==1)&&(i7.i0.u61.p147==1)))||(i23.i0.u186.p443!=1))||(i23.i3.u189.p452!=1))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 7,0,0.940504,27392,1,0,45468,473,3874,91071,134,2287,75096
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: AG(((((i16.i0.u124.p298!=1)||(i15.i3.u127.p304!=1))||(i15.i0.u128.p306!=1)) + !(EX((i1.u15.p37==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((((i16.i0.u124.p298!=1)||(i15.i3.u127.p304!=1))||(i15.i0.u128.p306!=1))))) * (i1.u15.p37==1))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 8,0,0.947883,27392,1,0,46313,473,3886,92718,134,2287,75885
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: EX(EF((((i15.i2.u122.p292==1)&&(i15.i2.u122.p294==1))||((i20.i0.u153.p364==1)&&(i20.i0.u160.p381==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (((i15.i2.u122.p292==1)&&(i15.i2.u122.p294==1))||((i20.i0.u153.p364==1)&&(i20.i0.u160.p381==1))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 9,1,0.950228,27656,1,0,46368,473,3898,92840,134,2287,75991
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-030A-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2020-05-27 13:03:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2020-05-27 13:03:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2020-05-27 13:03:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2020-05-27 13:03:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2020-05-27 13:03:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 120 redundant transitions.
[2020-05-27 13:03:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2020-05-27 13:03:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2020-05-27 13:03:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal : 6 ms
[2020-05-27 13:03:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, --quiet, -i, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -ctl, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -ctl /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
built 271 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
built 7 ordering constraints for composite.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.06499e+84,2.02383,69052,494,5,146007,829,1232,200064,12,611,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(((i162.u205.p388!=1)||(u210.p399!=1))) U AF(((((u32.p61==1)&&(u39.p74==1))&&(u252.p478==1))&&(u261.p495==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(((i162.u205.p388!=1)||(u210.p399!=1)))))) * !(EG(!(((((u32.p61==1)&&(u39.p74==1))&&(u252.p478==1))&&(u261.p495==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 101
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 102
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 103
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 104
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 105
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 106
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 108
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 109
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 110
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 111
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 112
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 113
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 114
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 116
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 117
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 118
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 119
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 121
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 123
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 124
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 125
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 126
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 127
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 128
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 130
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 131
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 132
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 133
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 134
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 135
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 136
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 138
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 139
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 140
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 141
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 142
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 143
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 144
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 146
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 147
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 148
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 149
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 150
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 151
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 153
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 154
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 155
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 156
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 157
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 158
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 160
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 161
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 162
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 163
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 164
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 165
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 166
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 168
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 169
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 171
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 172
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 173
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 174
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 176
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 177
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 178
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 180
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 181
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 183
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 184
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 185
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 186
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 188
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 189
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 190
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 192
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 193
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 194
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 196
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 197
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 198
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 199
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 200
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 202
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 204
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 205
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 206
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 207
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 208
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 210
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 212
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 213
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 214
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 215
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 216
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 218
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 220
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 221
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 222
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 223
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 225
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 227
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 229
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 230
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 232
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 233
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 234
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 235
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 236
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 237
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 238
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 239
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 240
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 241
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2020-05-27 13:24:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2020-05-27 13:24:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 422 transitions.
[2020-05-27 13:24:22] [INFO ] Transformed 573 places.
[2020-05-27 13:24:22] [INFO ] Transformed 422 transitions.
Running greatSPN : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn//bin/pinvar, /home/mcc/execution/gspn], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2, /home/mcc/execution/gspn, -META, -varord-only], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2020-05-27 13:24:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal : 4 ms
[2020-05-27 13:24:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, --quiet, -i, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -ctl, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl, --load-order, /home/mcc/execution/model.ord, --gen-order, FOLLOW], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202005100927/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -ctl /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl --load-order /home/mcc/execution/model.ord --gen-order FOLLOW
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.06499e+84,1.59154,52252,2,8044,5,203349,6,0,2716,234869,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(((p388!=1)||(p399!=1))) U AF(((((p61==1)&&(p74==1))&&(p478==1))&&(p495==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(((p388!=1)||(p399!=1)))))) * !(EG(!(((((p61==1)&&(p74==1))&&(p478==1))&&(p495==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//itstools/its-tools -data /home/mcc/execution/workspace -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/.eclipse -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx16000m -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Dosgi.requiredJavaVersion=1.6
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-030A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-030A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r210-tajo-159033475600332"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-030A.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-030A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;