fond
Model Checking Contest 2020
10th edition, Paris, France, June 23, 2020
Execution of r194-csrt-159033390400740
Last Updated
Jun 28, 2020

About the Execution of ITS-LoLa for EGFr-PT-02010

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
15744.410 3600000.00 22580.00 100.20 FFFTFFFFFFTTTTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/local/x2003239/mcc2020-input.r194-csrt-159033390400740.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/local/x2003239/mcc2020-input.qcow2 encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itslola
Input is EGFr-PT-02010, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r194-csrt-159033390400740
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 256K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 13 23:48 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 13 23:48 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 13 16:56 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K May 13 16:56 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 12 20:53 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 12 20:53 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 14 10:00 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 14 10:00 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.6K May 14 10:00 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 14 10:00 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 13 12:38 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 13 12:38 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 13 07:02 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 13 07:02 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 13 16:53 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 13 16:53 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:53 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:53 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 12 20:53 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 12 20:53 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1591239619792

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
[2020-06-04 03:00:22] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -timeout, 3600, -rebuildPNML]
[2020-06-04 03:00:22] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2020-06-04 03:00:22] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 50 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:22] [INFO ] Transformed 40 places.
[2020-06-04 03:00:22] [INFO ] Transformed 68 transitions.
[2020-06-04 03:00:22] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2020-06-04 03:00:22] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 40 places and 68 transitions in 110 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 32 ms.
Incomplete random walk after 100000 steps, including 4475 resets, run finished after 368 ms. (steps per millisecond=271 ) properties seen :[0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 39 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 40 cols
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 4 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 121 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 52 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 20 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints in 8 ms.
[2020-06-04 03:00:23] [INFO ] Added : 26 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 86 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 120 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 34 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 28 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 24 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints in 4 ms.
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] Added : 27 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 158 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 17 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 191 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 31 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 49 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 37 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 9 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 19 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints in 8 ms.
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] Added : 27 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 39 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:24] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 26 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 181 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 33 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 54 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 63 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints in 3 ms.
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] Added : 31 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 48 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 110 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 4 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 64 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 16 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 27 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints in 6 ms.
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] Added : 28 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 61 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:25] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 216 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 35 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 12 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 36 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 29 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 34 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 26 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 22 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 160 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints in 5 ms.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Added : 26 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 74 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 16 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 25 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 54 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 5 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 7 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 11 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 18 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 25 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 4 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 11 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 15 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints in 3 ms.
[2020-06-04 03:00:26] [INFO ] Added : 29 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 55 ms. Result :sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 21 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned unsat
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] [Real]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 3 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 25 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 22 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 65/85/36 causal constraints in 3 ms.
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] Added : 27 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 30 ms. Result :sat
Successfully simplified 9 atomic propositions for a total of 9 simplifications.
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] Export to MCC properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 6 ms.
[2020-06-04 03:00:27] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml took 2 ms.
info: Time: 3600 - MCC
vrfy: Checking CTLFireability @ EGFr-PT-02010 @ 3570 seconds

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

FORMULA EGFr-PT-02010-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT
vrfy: finished
info: timeLeft: 3566
rslt: Output for CTLFireability @ EGFr-PT-02010

{
"build":
{
"architecture": 64,
"assertions": false,
"build_hostname": "mcc2019",
"build_system": "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu",
"optimizations": true,
"package_version": "2.0",
"svn_version": "3189M"
},
"call":
{
"exec_host": "mcc2020",
"markinglimit": null,
"parameters":
[
"--pnmlnet",
"model.pnml",
"--xmlformula",
"--formula=CTLFireability.xml",
"--mcc",
"--donotcomputecapacities",
"--encoder=simplecompressed",
"--safe",
"--check=modelchecking",
"--stubborn=tarjan",
"--stateequation=par",
"--quickchecks",
"--timelimit=3570",
"--localtimelimit=0",
"--preference=force_ctl",
"--json=CTLFireability.json",
"--jsoninclude=formula,formulastat,net"
],
"starttime": "Thu Jun 4 03:00:27 2020
",
"timelimit": 3570
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 254
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 254
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 5,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 5,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 5,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36))",
"processed_size": 69,
"rewrites": 52
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 0,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 274
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p9 <= 0) OR (p26 <= 0))",
"processed_size": 26,
"rewrites": 52
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 1,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 297
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 4,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 4,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 4,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p34) AND (1 <= p36))",
"processed_size": 55,
"rewrites": 55
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 1,
"produced_by": "state space / EG",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 2,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 21
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 4,
"problems": 4
},
"type": "eventual_occurrence",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 324
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "AX(EF(((1 <= p23) AND (1 <= p24))))",
"processed_size": 35,
"rewrites": 54
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 1,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 26063,
"markings": 4080,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 3,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 0,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 274
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 2,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 6,
"adisj": 4,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 19,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 19,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 1,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 17,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "EF((EX((((1 <= p1) AND (1 <= p35)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36)))) AND (((1 <= p13) AND (1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p24) AND ((p5 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0))) OR ((1 <= p17) AND (1 <= p20) AND (((1 <= p3) AND (1 <= p10)) OR ((1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p32)))))))",
"processed_size": 303,
"rewrites": 54
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 1,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 26923,
"markings": 4200,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 1,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 297
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 297
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 0,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p14 <= 0) OR (p17 <= 0))",
"processed_size": 27,
"rewrites": 52
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "preprocessing",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 2,
"type": "initial_satisfaction",
"workflow": "preprocessing"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 324
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 4,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 4,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 4,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "EX(AF(((1 <= p1) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p30))))",
"processed_size": 64,
"rewrites": 54
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 1,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 25,
"markings": 24,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 3,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 2,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 324
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 3,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "EX(EF(EG(((1 <= p13) AND (1 <= p14)))))",
"processed_size": 39,
"rewrites": 55
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 1,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 31902,
"markings": 4199,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 3,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 356
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 2,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 3,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 11,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 11,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 1,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 9,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "AX((EG((((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p30)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p30) AND (1 <= p33)))) OR EF(((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36)))))",
"processed_size": 177,
"rewrites": 55
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 1,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 26064,
"markings": 4080,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 4,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 396
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 1,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "EX(AF(((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p30))))",
"processed_size": 35,
"rewrites": 54
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 1,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 25,
"markings": 24,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 5,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 445
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((1 <= p17) AND (1 <= p30))",
"processed_size": 27,
"rewrites": 56
},
"result":
{
"edges": 7,
"markings": 8,
"produced_by": "parallel",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 6,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "tscc preserving/always up"
}
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 2,
"problems": 2
},
"store":
{
"type": "dfs/tscc"
},
"type": "possible_invariance",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 509
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 4,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 4,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 4,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "((p0 <= 0) OR (p26 <= 0) OR (p30 <= 0) OR (p33 <= 0))",
"processed_size": 56,
"rewrites": 55
},
"result":
{
"edges": 21,
"markings": 22,
"produced_by": "state space / EG",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 7,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 30
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 4,
"problems": 4
},
"type": "eventual_occurrence",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 594
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 1,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 6,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 6,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 6,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "E(AF((((1 <= p13) AND (1 <= p20)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p30) AND (1 <= p33)))) U DEADLOCK)",
"processed_size": 108,
"rewrites": 54
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 1,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 8700,
"markings": 2034,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 8,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 713
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 4,
"adisj": 2,
"aneg": 2,
"comp": 10,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 10,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 1,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 8,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "EG((((((p9 <= 0) OR (p32 <= 0)) AND ((p0 <= 0) OR (p22 <= 0) OR (p27 <= 0) OR (p28 <= 0))) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p15))) AND AF(((p0 <= 0) OR (p17 <= 0)))))",
"processed_size": 163,
"rewrites": 54
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 1,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 145,
"markings": 50,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 9,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 891
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 2,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 2,
"comp": 9,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 9,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 1,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 9,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "EG((((p23 <= 0) OR ((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19)) OR (p30 <= 0) OR (p1 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0)) OR AF(((p5 <= 0) OR (p7 <= 0) OR (p38 <= 0)))))",
"processed_size": 142,
"rewrites": 54
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 1,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 21,
"markings": 22,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 10,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1188
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 1,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 1,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 3,
"adisj": 1,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 12,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 12,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 12,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "E((((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36)) OR ((1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p12) AND (1 <= p25))) U AG(((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p16) AND (1 <= p21))))",
"processed_size": 184,
"rewrites": 54
},
"net":
{
"conflict_clusters": 1,
"singleton_clusters": 0
},
"result":
{
"edges": 1480,
"markings": 471,
"produced_by": "CTL model checker",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 11,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "ctl preserving"
},
"type": "ctl model checker"
},
"type": "CTL"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1783
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 1783
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "E (F (((1 <= p23) AND (1 <= p29))))",
"processed_size": 35,
"rewrites": 53
},
"result":
{
"edges": 550,
"markings": 228,
"produced_by": "state space",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 12,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion"
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 2,
"problems": 2
},
"type": "reachability",
"workflow": "stateequation||search"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 3566
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 1,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 1,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "E (G (((p27 <= 0) OR (p32 <= 0))))",
"processed_size": 35,
"rewrites": 53
},
"result":
{
"edges": 21,
"markings": 22,
"produced_by": "state space / EG",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 13,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion",
"visible": 14
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 2,
"problems": 2
},
"type": "possible_preservation",
"workflow": "stateequation"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": true
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 12,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 3566
},
"child":
[

{
"call":
{
"dynamic_timelimit": true,
"localtimelimit": 3566
},
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "E (F (((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19))))",
"processed_size": 35,
"rewrites": 53
},
"result":
{
"edges": 7,
"markings": 8,
"produced_by": "state space",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 13,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion"
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 2,
"problems": 2
},
"type": "reachability",
"workflow": "stateequation||search"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"localtimelimitreached": false
},
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": null
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 13,
"type": "boolean"
}
},

{
"child":
[

{
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 0,
"E": 1,
"F": 1,
"G": 0,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 2,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 2,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 2,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "E (F (((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19))))",
"processed_size": 35,
"rewrites": 53
},
"result":
{
"edges": 7,
"markings": 8,
"produced_by": "state space",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 14,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion"
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 2,
"problems": 2
},
"type": "reachability",
"workflow": "stateequation||search"
}
},

{
"formula":
{
"count":
{
"A": 1,
"E": 0,
"F": 0,
"G": 1,
"U": 0,
"X": 0,
"aconj": 1,
"adisj": 0,
"aneg": 0,
"comp": 4,
"cont": 0,
"dl": 0,
"fir": 0,
"nodl": 0,
"place_references": 4,
"taut": 0,
"tconj": 0,
"tdisj": 0,
"tneg": 0,
"transition_references": 0,
"unfir": 0,
"visible_places": 4,
"visible_transitions": 0
},
"processed": "A (G (((1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p11) AND (1 <= p34) AND (1 <= p36))))",
"processed_size": 64,
"rewrites": 54
},
"result":
{
"edges": 0,
"markings": 0,
"produced_by": "state space",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 15,
"search":
{
"store":
{
"encoder": "simple compression",
"type": "prefix"
},
"stubborn":
{
"type": "reachability preserving/insertion"
},
"threads": 1,
"type": "dfs"
},
"stateequation":
{
"literals": 4,
"problems": 4
},
"type": "invariance",
"workflow": "stateequation||search"
}
}
],
"result":
{
"produced_by": "boolean",
"value": false
},
"task":
{
"compoundnumber": 14,
"type": "boolean"
}
}
],
"exit":
{
"error": null,
"memory": 56636,
"runtime": 4.000000,
"signal": null,
"timelimitreached": false
},
"files":
{
"formula": "CTLFireability.xml",
"net": "model.pnml"
},
"formula":
{
"skeleton": "(A(X(E(F(**)))) AND (A(F(*)) AND (** AND (** OR (A(X(**)) AND (** AND (** AND (** AND (** AND **))))))))) : (A(G(**)) OR E(F(**))) : E(F((E(X(**)) AND **))) : (E(G(*)) AND E(F(**))) : A(F(**)) : (E(X(A(F(**)))) AND **) : E((A(F(**)) U DEADLOCK)) : E(X(E(F(E(G(**)))))) : E((** U A(G(**)))) : E(F(A(G(*)))) : E(G((* AND A(F(*))))) : E(G((* OR A(F(*))))) : A(X((E(G(**)) OR E(F(**))))) : E(X(A(F(**))))"
},
"net":
{
"arcs": 338,
"conflict_clusters": 1,
"places": 40,
"places_significant": 20,
"singleton_clusters": 0,
"transitions": 68
},
"result":
{
"preliminary_value": "no no no yes no no no no no yes yes yes no no ",
"value": "no no no yes no no no no no yes yes yes no no "
},
"task":
{
"type": "compound"
}
}
lola: LoLA will run for 3570 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: input: PNML file (--pnml)
lola: reading net from model.pnml
lola: reading pnml
lola: PNML file contains place/transition net
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml
lola: 108/268435456 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: Size of bit vector: 40
lola: finding significant places
lola: 40 places, 68 transitions, 20 significant places
lola: compute conflict clusters
lola: computed conflict clusters
lola: Computing conflicting sets
lola: Computing back conflicting sets
lola: TASK
lola: Reading formula in XML format (--xmlformula)
lola: reading pnml
lola: reading formula from CTLFireability.xml
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p23 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p24 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p4 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p9 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p34 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p36 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p9 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p26 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p0 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p4 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p32 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p36 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p17 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p30 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p5 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p35 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p12 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p25 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p15 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p30 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p11 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p34 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p36 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p14 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p19 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p35 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p0 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p4 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p32 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p36 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p13 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p14 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p19 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p24 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p5 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p35 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p17 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p20 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p3 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p10 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p9 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p32 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p27 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p32 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p22 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p28 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p27 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p32 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p23 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p29 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p0 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p26 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p30 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p33 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p32 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p19 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p30 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p14 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p17 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p13 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p20 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p0 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p26 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p30 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p33 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p13 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p14 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p0 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p4 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p32 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p36 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p9 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p26 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p12 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p25 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p15 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p16 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p21 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p17 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p30 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p9 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p32 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p0 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p22 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p27 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p28 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p0 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p15 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p0 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p17 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p14 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p19 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p23 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p30 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p1 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p35 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p5 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p7 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p38 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p15 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p30 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p0 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p26 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p30 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p33 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p0 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p2 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p4 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p32 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p36 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p15 <= 1)
lola: LP says that atomic proposition is always true: (p30 <= 1)
lola: (((A (X (E (F (((1 <= p23) AND (1 <= p24)))))) AND NOT(E (G (((1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p34) AND (1 <= p36)))))) AND ((p9 <= 0) OR (p26 <= 0))) AND (A (((1 <= 0) U ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36)))) OR (((((A (X (((1 <= p17) AND (1 <= p30)))) AND ((1 <= p5))) AND ((1 <= p35))) AND ((1 <= p12))) AND ((1 <= p25))) AND ((p15 <= 0) OR (p30 <= 0))))) : (A (G (((1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p11) AND (1 <= p34) AND (1 <= p36)))) OR E (F (((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19))))) : E (F ((E (X ((((1 <= p1) AND (1 <= p35)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36))))) AND (((1 <= p13) AND (1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p24) AND ((p5 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0))) OR ((1 <= p17) AND (1 <= p20) AND (((1 <= p3) AND (1 <= p10)) OR ((1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p32)))))))) : (NOT(A (F (A (F (((1 <= p27) AND (1 <= p32))))))) AND E ((((1 <= p27) AND ((p1 <= 0) OR (p22 <= 0) OR (p28 <= 0)) AND (1 <= p32)) U E (F (((1 <= p23) AND (1 <= p29))))))) : (A (((1 <= 0) U A (F (((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p30) AND (1 <= p33)))))) AND E (((1 <= 0) U (0 <= 0)))) : (E (X (A (F (((1 <= p1) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p30)))))) AND ((p14 <= 0) OR (p17 <= 0))) : E ((A (F ((((1 <= p13) AND (1 <= p20)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p30) AND (1 <= p33))))) U A (X ((1 <= 0))))) : E (F (E (X (E (G (((1 <= p13) AND (1 <= p14)))))))) : E (((((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36)) OR ((1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p12) AND (1 <= p25))) U A (G (((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p16) AND (1 <= p21)))))) : NOT(A (G (E (F (((1 <= p17) AND (1 <= p30))))))) : NOT(A (F ((((((1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p32)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p22) AND (1 <= p27) AND (1 <= p28))) AND ((p0 <= 0) OR (p15 <= 0))) OR E (G (((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p17)))))))) : NOT(A (F ((((1 <= p23) AND ((p14 <= 0) OR (p19 <= 0)) AND (1 <= p30) AND (1 <= p1) AND (1 <= p35)) AND E (G (((1 <= p5) AND (1 <= p7) AND (1 <= p38)))))))) : A (X ((E (G ((((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p30)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p30) AND (1 <= p33))))) OR E (F (((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36))))))) : E (X (A (F (((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p30))))))
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:326
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:98
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:184
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:251
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:392
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:323
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:473
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:98
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:184
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:98
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:100
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:166
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:148
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:115
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:98
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:139
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:395
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:323
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:326
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:323
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:318
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:326
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:323
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:332
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:315
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:326
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:329
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:297
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 254 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (A (X (E (F (((1 <= p23) AND (1 <= p24)))))) AND (A (F (((p4 <= 0) OR (p9 <= 0) OR (p34 <= 0) OR (p36 <= 0)))) AND (((p9 <= 0) OR (p26 <= 0)) AND (((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36)) OR (A (X (((1 <= p17) AND (1 <= p30)))) AND (((1 <= p5)) AND (((1 <= p35)) AND (((1 <= p12)) AND (((1 <= p25)) AND ((p15 <= 0) OR (p30 <= 0)))))))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 254 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36))
lola: processed formula length: 69
lola: 52 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: processed formula with 5 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 274 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((p9 <= 0) OR (p26 <= 0))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: ((p9 <= 0) OR (p26 <= 0))
lola: processed formula length: 26
lola: 52 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: processed formula with 2 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 297 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (F (((p4 <= 0) OR (p9 <= 0) OR (p34 <= 0) OR (p36 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking eventual occurrence
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:584
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:749
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: processed formula: ((1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p34) AND (1 <= p36))
lola: processed formula length: 55
lola: 55 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space / EG)
lola: state space: using search routine for EG formula (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using EG preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:700
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((p4 <= 0) OR (p9 <= 0) OR (p34 <= 0) OR (p36 <= 0))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 4 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space / EG
lola: The predicate eventually occurs.
lola: 1 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 324 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (X (E (F (((1 <= p23) AND (1 <= p24))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:806
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:812
lola: processed formula: AX(EF(((1 <= p23) AND (1 <= p24))))
lola: processed formula length: 35
lola: 54 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 1 significant temporal operators and needs 5 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula.
lola: 4080 markings, 26063 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The Boolean predicate is false.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 274 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((E (X ((((1 <= p1) AND (1 <= p35)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36))))) AND (((1 <= p13) AND (1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p24) AND ((p5 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0))) OR ((1 <= p17) AND (1 <= p20) AND (((1 <= p3) AND (1 <= p10)) OR ((1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p32))))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:807
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:806
lola: processed formula: EF((EX((((1 <= p1) AND (1 <= p35)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36)))) AND (((1 <= p13) AND (1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p24) AND ((p5 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0))) OR ((1 <= p17) AND (1 <= p20) AND (((1 <= p3) AND (1 <= p10)) OR ((1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p32)))))))
lola: processed formula length: 303
lola: 54 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 1 significant temporal operators and needs 5 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula.
lola: 4200 markings, 26923 edges
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 297 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (E (X (A (F (((1 <= p1) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p30)))))) AND ((p14 <= 0) OR (p17 <= 0)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 297 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: ((p14 <= 0) OR (p17 <= 0))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: ((p14 <= 0) OR (p17 <= 0))
lola: processed formula length: 27
lola: 52 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: processed formula with 2 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 324 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (X (A (F (((1 <= p1) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p30))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:811
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:807
lola: processed formula: EX(AF(((1 <= p1) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p19) AND (1 <= p30))))
lola: processed formula length: 64
lola: 54 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 1 significant temporal operators and needs 5 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula.
lola: 24 markings, 25 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The Boolean predicate is false.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 324 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (X (E (F (E (G (((1 <= p13) AND (1 <= p14))))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:808
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:806
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:807
lola: processed formula: EX(EF(EG(((1 <= p13) AND (1 <= p14)))))
lola: processed formula length: 39
lola: 55 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 2 significant temporal operators and needs 9 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula.
lola: 4199 markings, 31902 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 356 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (X ((E (G ((((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p30)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p30) AND (1 <= p33))))) OR E (F (((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36)))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:808
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:806
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:812
lola: processed formula: AX((EG((((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p30)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p30) AND (1 <= p33)))) OR EF(((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36)))))
lola: processed formula length: 177
lola: 55 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 2 significant temporal operators and needs 9 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula.
lola: 4080 markings, 26064 edges
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 396 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (X (A (F (((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p30))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:811
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:807
lola: processed formula: EX(AF(((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p30))))
lola: processed formula length: 35
lola: 54 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 1 significant temporal operators and needs 5 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula.
lola: 24 markings, 25 edges
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 445 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (A (G (((p17 <= 0) OR (p30 <= 0))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: lola: ========================================checking possible invariance

lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:604
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:614
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:726
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: ========================================
lola: processed formula: ((1 <= p17) AND (1 <= p30))
lola: processed formula length: 27
lola: 56 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using tscc preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:700
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((p17 <= 0) OR (p30 <= 0))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result started, id 1
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 1
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: parallel
lola: The predicate is possibly invariant.
lola: 8 markings, 7 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 509 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (F (((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p30) AND (1 <= p33))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking eventual occurrence
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:584
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:749
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: processed formula: ((p0 <= 0) OR (p26 <= 0) OR (p30 <= 0) OR (p33 <= 0))
lola: processed formula length: 56
lola: 55 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space / EG)
lola: state space: using search routine for EG formula (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using EG preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:700
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p30) AND (1 <= p33))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space / EG
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: The predicate does not eventually occur.
lola: 22 markings, 21 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 594 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E ((A (F ((((1 <= p13) AND (1 <= p20)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p30) AND (1 <= p33))))) U DEADLOCK))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:811
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:809
lola: processed formula: E(AF((((1 <= p13) AND (1 <= p20)) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p30) AND (1 <= p33)))) U DEADLOCK)
lola: processed formula length: 108
lola: 54 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 2 significant temporal operators and needs 9 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula.
lola: 2034 markings, 8700 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 713 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (G ((((((p9 <= 0) OR (p32 <= 0)) AND ((p0 <= 0) OR (p22 <= 0) OR (p27 <= 0) OR (p28 <= 0))) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p15))) AND A (F (((p0 <= 0) OR (p17 <= 0)))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:811
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:808
lola: processed formula: EG((((((p9 <= 0) OR (p32 <= 0)) AND ((p0 <= 0) OR (p22 <= 0) OR (p27 <= 0) OR (p28 <= 0))) OR ((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p15))) AND AF(((p0 <= 0) OR (p17 <= 0)))))
lola: processed formula length: 163
lola: 54 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 2 significant temporal operators and needs 9 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula.
lola: 50 markings, 145 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 891 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (G ((((p23 <= 0) OR ((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19)) OR (p30 <= 0) OR (p1 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0)) OR A (F (((p5 <= 0) OR (p7 <= 0) OR (p38 <= 0)))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:811
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:808
lola: processed formula: EG((((p23 <= 0) OR ((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19)) OR (p30 <= 0) OR (p1 <= 0) OR (p35 <= 0)) OR AF(((p5 <= 0) OR (p7 <= 0) OR (p38 <= 0)))))
lola: processed formula length: 142
lola: 54 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 2 significant temporal operators and needs 9 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net satisfies the given formula.
lola: 22 markings, 21 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 1188 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (((((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36)) OR ((1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p12) AND (1 <= p25))) U A (G (((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p16) AND (1 <= p21))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking CTL
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:813
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:809
lola: processed formula: E((((1 <= p0) AND (1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p4) AND (1 <= p32) AND (1 <= p36)) OR ((1 <= p9) AND (1 <= p26) AND (1 <= p12) AND (1 <= p25))) U AG(((1 <= p15) AND (1 <= p16) AND (1 <= p21))))
lola: processed formula length: 184
lola: 54 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: Using CTL preserving stubborn sets
lola: RUNNING
lola: CTL formula contains 2 significant temporal operators and needs 9 bytes of payload
lola: Ignoring fairness constraints (--fair).
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: CTL model checker
lola: The net does not satisfy the given formula.
lola: 471 markings, 1480 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 1783 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (E (G (((p27 <= 0) OR (p32 <= 0)))) AND E (F (((1 <= p23) AND (1 <= p29)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 1783 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((1 <= p23) AND (1 <= p29))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: processed formula: E (F (((1 <= p23) AND (1 <= p29))))
lola: processed formula length: 35
lola: 53 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p23) AND (1 <= p29))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 228 markings, 550 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 3566 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (G (((p27 <= 0) OR (p32 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking possible preservation
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:583
lola: processed formula: E (G (((p27 <= 0) OR (p32 <= 0))))
lola: processed formula length: 35
lola: 53 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space / EG)
lola: state space: using search routine for EG formula (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using EG preserving stubborn set method (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation (--findpath=off)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:788
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p27) AND (1 <= p32))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space / EG
lola: The predicate is possibly preserved.
lola: 22 markings, 21 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: The Boolean predicate is true.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 3566 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (A (G (((1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p11) AND (1 <= p34) AND (1 <= p36)))) OR E (F (((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 3566 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: processed formula: E (F (((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19))))
lola: processed formula length: 35
lola: 53 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: 8 markings, 7 edges
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: ========================================
lola: Child process aborted or communication problem between parent and child process
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: unknown
lola: The Boolean predicate may be true or false.
lola: ========================================
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: (A (G (((1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p11) AND (1 <= p34) AND (1 <= p36)))) OR E (F (((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking a Boolean combination of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: processed formula: E (F (((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19))))
lola: processed formula length: 35
lola: 53 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:711
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((1 <= p14) AND (1 <= p19))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: 8 markings, 7 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to CTLFireability-14-0.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p11) AND (1 <= p34) AND (1 <= p36))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: processed formula: A (G (((1 <= p2) AND (1 <= p11) AND (1 <= p34) AND (1 <= p36))))
lola: processed formula length: 64
lola: 54 rewrites
lola: closed formula file CTLFireability.xml
lola: STORE
lola: using a simple compression encoder (--encoder=simplecompressed)
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: built state equation task
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation task get result started, id 0
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:721
lola: rewrite Frontend/Parser/formula_rewrite.k:787
lola: state equation task get result rewrite finished id 0
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished++ id 0
lola: formula 0: ((p2 <= 0) OR (p11 <= 0) OR (p34 <= 0) OR (p36 <= 0))
lola: state equation task get result unparse finished id 0
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 4 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to CTLFireability-15-0.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The Boolean predicate is false.
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: no no no yes no no no no no yes yes yes no no
lola:
preliminary result: no no no yes no no no no no yes yes yes no no
lola: memory consumption: 56636 KB
lola: time consumption: 4 seconds
lola: print data as JSON (--json)
lola: writing JSON to CTLFireability.json
lola: closed JSON file CTLFireability.json
rslt: finished

--------------------
content from stderr:

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="EGFr-PT-02010"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itslola"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itslola"
echo " Input is EGFr-PT-02010, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r194-csrt-159033390400740"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/EGFr-PT-02010.tgz
mv EGFr-PT-02010 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;