Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2019-input.r140-smll-155284912500151.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/data/fkordon/mcc2019-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-3817
Executing tool itstools
Input is Referendum-COL-0020, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r140-smll-155284912500151
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 168K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Feb 12 12:06 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Feb 12 12:05 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Feb 8 14:26 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Feb 8 14:26 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Mar 10 17:31 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Mar 10 17:31 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 106 Feb 24 15:05 GlobalProperties.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 344 Feb 24 15:05 GlobalProperties.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Feb 5 01:02 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 5 01:02 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Feb 4 22:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K Feb 4 22:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K Feb 4 14:59 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Feb 4 14:59 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Feb 1 11:26 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Feb 1 11:26 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Feb 4 22:30 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Feb 4 22:30 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 Jan 29 09:35 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 Jan 29 09:35 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 Jan 29 09:35 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Mar 10 17:31 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1552959762955

01:42:46.804 [main] ERROR PNML validation - The rng grammar file can't be accessed : www.pnml.org
01:42:46.809 [main] ERROR import - Grammar file errors have been raised, the validation can't be done, process will continue without Grammar validation
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Using solver Z3 to compute partial order matrices.
Built C files in :
/home/mcc/execution
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.201903111103/bin/its-ltl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, -i, /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -LTL, /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.ltl, -c, -stutter-deadlock], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.201903111103/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -LTL /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.ltl -c -stutter-deadlock
Read 16 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(X(G("(ready_0>=1)")))))
Formula 0 simplified : !GXG"(ready_0>=1)"
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
4 unique states visited
4 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
4 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.079999,17700,1,0,28,5299,23,42,915,4736,83
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 0 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 1 : !(((G(F(F("(ready_0>=1)"))))U("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))")))
Formula 1 simplified : !(GF"(ready_0>=1)" U "((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))")
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
5 unique states visited
4 strongly connected components in search stack
5 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
1 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.089023,18448,1,0,29,5308,37,45,976,5178,148
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 1 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 2 : !(((X("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))"))U(X(X(G("(ready_0>=1)"))))))
Formula 2 simplified : !(X"((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))" U XXG"(ready_0>=1)")
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
11 unique states visited
8 strongly connected components in search stack
11 transitions explored
8 items max in DFS search stack
1 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.098637,19240,1,0,30,5518,37,46,976,5572,172
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 2 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 3 : !((X(X((X("(ready_0>=1)"))U(F("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))"))))))
Formula 3 simplified : !XX(X"(ready_0>=1)" U F"((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))")
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
3 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
2 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.102073,19240,1,0,30,5518,41,46,976,5572,174
no accepting run found
Formula 3 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 4 : !((F(G(X(X("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))"))))))
Formula 4 simplified : !FGXX"((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))"
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
24 unique states visited
24 strongly connected components in search stack
25 transitions explored
24 items max in DFS search stack
2 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.113581,19240,1,0,30,5520,41,48,976,6580,234
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 4 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 5 : !((("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))")U("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))")))
Formula 5 simplified : !"((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))"
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.115812,19240,1,0,30,5520,41,48,976,6580,235
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 5 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 6 : !((X(F(X(F(F("(ready_0>=1)")))))))
Formula 6 simplified : !XFXF"(ready_0>=1)"
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
4 unique states visited
4 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
3 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.144284,19988,1,0,65,10333,41,85,976,18598,326
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 6 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 7 : !((((G("(ready_0>=1)"))U(X("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))")))U(X("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))"))))
Formula 7 simplified : !((G"(ready_0>=1)" U X"((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))") U X"((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))")
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
2 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
1 transitions explored
2 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.151421,20920,1,0,65,10333,44,85,997,18598,332
no accepting run found
Formula 7 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 8 : !((X(F(X(G(G("(ready_0>=1)")))))))
Formula 8 simplified : !XFXG"(ready_0>=1)"
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
4 unique states visited
4 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
1 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.15409,20920,1,0,65,10333,51,85,997,18598,432
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 8 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 9 : !(("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))"))
Formula 9 simplified : !"((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))"
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.155894,20920,1,0,65,10333,51,85,997,18598,432
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 9 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 10 : !((F(X(F("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))")))))
Formula 10 simplified : !FXF"((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))"
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
2 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
1 transitions explored
2 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.157709,20920,1,0,65,10333,51,85,997,18598,433
no accepting run found
Formula 10 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 11 : !(((F(("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))")U("(ready_0>=1)")))U(X("(ready_0>=1)"))))
Formula 11 simplified : !(F("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))" U "(ready_0>=1)") U X"(ready_0>=1)")
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.16081,20920,1,0,84,10512,51,125,997,19348,530
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 11 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 12 : !((G(("(ready_0>=1)")U(F("(ready_0>=1)")))))
Formula 12 simplified : !G("(ready_0>=1)" U F"(ready_0>=1)")
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
24 unique states visited
24 strongly connected components in search stack
25 transitions explored
24 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.161398,20920,1,0,84,10512,51,125,997,19348,532
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 12 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 13 : !((X("(ready_0>=1)")))
Formula 13 simplified : !X"(ready_0>=1)"
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
4 unique states visited
4 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.161717,20920,1,0,84,10512,51,125,997,19348,532
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 13 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 14 : !(("(ready_0>=1)"))
Formula 14 simplified : !"(ready_0>=1)"
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
1 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
0 transitions explored
1 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.161997,20920,1,0,84,10512,51,125,997,19348,532
no accepting run found
Formula 14 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 15 : !((F(G(X(G(X("((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))")))))))
Formula 15 simplified : !FGXGX"((((((((((((((((((((voting_0>=1)||(voting_1>=1))||(voting_2>=1))||(voting_3>=1))||(voting_4>=1))||(voting_5>=1))||(voting_6>=1))||(voting_7>=1))||(voting_8>=1))||(voting_9>=1))||(voting_10>=1))||(voting_11>=1))||(voting_12>=1))||(voting_13>=1))||(voting_14>=1))||(voting_15>=1))||(voting_16>=1))||(voting_17>=1))||(voting_18>=1))||(voting_19>=1))"
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1.04858e+06 deadlock states
24 unique states visited
23 strongly connected components in search stack
26 transitions explored
24 items max in DFS search stack
1 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.16441,20920,1,0,84,10512,51,125,997,19348,532
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 15 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA Referendum-COL-0020-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Running compilation step : CommandLine [args=[gcc, -c, -I/home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir//include, -I., -std=c99, -fPIC, -O2, model.c], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.

BK_STOP 1552959769627

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -smt
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//itstools/its-tools -data /home/mcc/execution/workspace -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -smt -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/.eclipse -Xss8m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Dosgi.requiredJavaVersion=1.6
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:46 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application start
INFO: Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsminpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/, -smt]
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:46 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator transformPNML
INFO: Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:46 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.PnmlToGalTransformer transform
INFO: Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:47 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.PnmlToGalTransformer transform
INFO: Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1317 ms
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:47 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.HLGALTransformer handlePage
INFO: Transformed 4 places.
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:47 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.HLGALTransformer handlePage
INFO: Computed order using colors.
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:47 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.HLGALTransformer handlePage
INFO: sort/places :Dot->ready,
Voters->voted_no,voted_yes,voting,

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:47 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.HLGALTransformer handlePage
INFO: Transformed 3 transitions.
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:47 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.PnmlToGalTransformer transform
INFO: Computed order based on color domains.
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:47 AM fr.lip6.move.serialization.SerializationUtil systemToFile
INFO: Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml.img.gal : 9 ms
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:47 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator applyOrder
INFO: Applying decomposition
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:47 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.GALRewriter flatten
INFO: Flatten gal took : 42 ms
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:47 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.GALRewriter flatten
INFO: Flatten gal took : 22 ms
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:47 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder decomposeWithOrder
INFO: Decomposing Gal with order
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder rewriteArraysToAllowPartition
INFO: Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to ready_0 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_0 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_1 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_2 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_3 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_4 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_5 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_6 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_7 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_8 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_9 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_10 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_11 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_12 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_13 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_14 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_15 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_16 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_17 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_18 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_no_19 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_0 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_1 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_2 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_3 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_4 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_5 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_6 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_7 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_8 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_9 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_10 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_11 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_12 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_13 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_14 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_15 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_16 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_17 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_18 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voted_yes_19 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_0 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_1 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_2 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_3 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_4 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_5 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_6 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_7 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_8 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_9 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_10 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_11 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_12 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_13 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_14 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_15 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_16 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_17 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_18 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder$Partition getIndex
INFO: Could not find partition element corresponding to voting_19 in partition

Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator applyOrder
WARNING: Could not apply decomposition. Using flat GAL structure.
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1
at org.eclipse.emf.common.util.BasicEList.get(BasicEList.java:348)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder.galToCompositeWithPartition(CompositeBuilder.java:439)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder.decomposeWithOrder(CompositeBuilder.java:145)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator.applyOrder(MccTranslator.java:129)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator.flattenSpec(MccTranslator.java:156)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:236)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:40)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:203)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:137)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:107)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:400)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:659)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:595)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1501)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1474)
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.GALRewriter flatten
INFO: Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.serialization.SerializationUtil systemToFile
INFO: Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.pnml.gal : 2 ms
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.serialization.SerializationUtil serializePropertiesForITSLTLTools
INFO: Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.ltl : 4 ms
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.semantics.DeterministicNextBuilder getDeterministicNext
INFO: Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM org.smtlib.impl.Script execute
WARNING: Script execution failed on command (define-fun tr23 ((step Int)) Bool (trsrc23 (select s step) (select s (+ step 1)))) with error (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Skipping mayMatrices nes/nds Error when declaring system variables to SMT solver.(error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
java.lang.RuntimeException: Error when declaring system variables to SMT solver.(error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
at fr.lip6.move.gal.gal2smt.bmc.NextBMCSolver.init(NextBMCSolver.java:93)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.gal2smt.bmc.KInductionSolver.init(KInductionSolver.java:59)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.gal2smt.bmc.NecessaryEnablingsolver.init(NecessaryEnablingsolver.java:71)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.gal2pins.Gal2PinsTransformerNext.printLabels(Gal2PinsTransformerNext.java:471)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.gal2pins.Gal2PinsTransformerNext.printDependencyMatrix(Gal2PinsTransformerNext.java:209)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.gal2pins.Gal2PinsTransformerNext.buildBodyFile(Gal2PinsTransformerNext.java:85)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.gal2pins.Gal2PinsTransformerNext.transform(Gal2PinsTransformerNext.java:830)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.LTSminRunner$1.run(LTSminRunner.java:71)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Mar 19, 2019 1:42:48 AM fr.lip6.move.gal.gal2pins.Gal2PinsTransformerNext transform
INFO: Built C files in 194ms conformant to PINS in folder :/home/mcc/execution

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Referendum-COL-0020"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-3817"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Referendum-COL-0020, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r140-smll-155284912500151"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Referendum-COL-0020.tgz
mv Referendum-COL-0020 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "GlobalProperties" ] ; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;