Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................
/home/mcc/execution
total 188K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 15 18:54 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 15 18:54 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 15 18:54 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 15 18:54 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 15 18:50 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 15 18:50 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 15 18:54 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.9K May 15 18:54 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 15 18:54 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K May 15 18:54 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 106 May 15 18:54 ReachabilityDeadlock.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 344 May 15 18:54 ReachabilityDeadlock.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.8K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 15 18:54 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 15 18:54 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 15 18:50 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 15 18:50 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 15 18:50 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 24K May 15 18:50 model.pnml
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-3637
Executing tool irma4mcc-full
Input is TCPcondis-PT-30, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r174-smll-152708744900215
=====================================================================

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1527160953207


BK_STOP 1527160999414

--------------------
content from stderr:

Prefix is 65b80f64.
Reading known information in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/65b80f64-known.json.
Reading learned information in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/65b80f64-learned.json.
Reading value translations in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/65b80f64-values.json.
Using directory /home/mcc/execution for input, as it contains a model.pnml file.
Using TCPcondis-PT-30 as instance name.
Using TCPcondis as model name.
Using algorithm or tool bmdt.
Model characteristics are: {'Examination': 'ReachabilityCardinality', 'Place/Transition': True, 'Colored': False, 'Relative-Time': 1, 'Relative-Memory': 1, 'Ordinary': True, 'Simple Free Choice': False, 'Extended Free Choice': False, 'State Machine': False, 'Marked Graph': False, 'Connected': True, 'Strongly Connected': True, 'Source Place': False, 'Sink Place': False, 'Source Transition': False, 'Sink Transition': False, 'Loop Free': True, 'Conservative': False, 'Sub-Conservative': False, 'Nested Units': False, 'Safe': False, 'Deadlock': False, 'Reversible': True, 'Quasi Live': True, 'Live': True}.
Known tools are: [{'Time': 291, 'Memory': 107.88, 'Tool': 'lola'}, {'Time': 516, 'Memory': 111.04, 'Tool': 'lola'}, {'Time': 23466, 'Memory': 625.69, 'Tool': 'itstools'}, {'Time': 23503, 'Memory': 618.82, 'Tool': 'itstools'}].
Learned tools are: [{'Tool': 'lola'}].
Learned tool lola is 1.0x far from the best tool lola.
ReachabilityCardinality lola TCPcondis-PT-30...

Time: 3600 - MCC
----- Start make prepare stdout -----
----- Start make prepare stderr -----
===========================================================================================
TCPcondis-PT-30: translating PT Petri net model.pnml into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating PT Petri net complete


checking for too many tokens
===========================================================================================
TCPcondis-PT-30: translating PT formula ReachabilityCardinality into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating formula complete
touch formulae;
----- Start make result stdout -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
ReachabilityCardinality @ TCPcondis-PT-30 @ 3539 seconds
----- Start make result stdout -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
lola: LoLA will run for 3539 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: reading net from model.pnml.lola
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml.lola
lola: 62/65536 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: finding significant places
lola: 30 places, 32 transitions, 21 significant places
lola: computing forward-conflicting sets
lola: computing back-conflicting sets
lola: 48 transition conflict sets
lola: TASK
lola: reading formula from TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: E (F (((xSYNSENT <= xESTAB) AND (xCLOSED <= ESTAB)))) : E (F (((xLASTACK <= FINWAIT1) AND (TIMEWAIT <= LASTACK) AND (xSYN <= xFIN) AND (CLOSED <= FINWAIT2)))) : E (F (((3 <= FINACK) AND (2 <= xCLOSEWAIT) AND (xFINACK <= 1) AND (1 <= FINWAIT2)))) : A (G ((2 <= CLOSED))) : A (G (((3 <= TIMEWAIT) OR (2 <= CLOSEWAIT) OR (xCLOSING <= SYNSENT) OR (xFINACK <= SYN) OR (xFINACK <= 2)))) : E (F (((xCLOSEWAIT + 1 <= xFIN) AND (FINWAIT1 <= 2) AND (1 <= FINACK)))) : A (G (((LASTACK + 1 <= xFINACK) OR (xSYNACK + 1 <= FINWAIT2) OR (xTIMEWAIT <= xSYNRCVD)))) : A (G (((ESTAB <= CLOSEWAIT) OR (TIMEWAIT <= xFIN) OR (2 <= LISTEN) OR (xLISTEN + 1 <= FINWAIT2)))) : A (G (((xCLOSED <= 1) OR (xLASTACK <= 1) OR (FINACK + 1 <= ESTAB)))) : E (F (((xFIN <= 2) AND (SYN + 1 <= CLOSING) AND (2 <= CLOSING)))) : A (G (TRUE)) : E (F (((2 <= xTIMEWAIT) AND (2 <= CLOSED) AND ((3 <= xSYN) OR (2 <= FINWAIT1)) AND (xESTAB <= xFINACK)))) : E (F (((3 <= LASTACK) AND (SYN <= FIN) AND ((3 <= CLOSING) OR (2 <= xSYNRCVD)) AND (xSYNSENT <= 2) AND (xFINACK <= 2)))) : A (G (())) : E (F (((CLOSED <= xLISTEN) AND (FINACK <= xFINWAIT2)))) : A (G (((2 <= xCLOSED))))
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 221 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((xSYNSENT <= xESTAB) AND (xCLOSED <= ESTAB))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 61 markings, 60 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 235 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((xLASTACK <= FINWAIT1) AND (TIMEWAIT <= LASTACK) AND (xSYN <= xFIN) AND (CLOSED <= FINWAIT2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 31 markings, 30 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 252 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((3 <= FINACK) AND (2 <= xCLOSEWAIT) AND (xFINACK <= 1) AND (1 <= FINWAIT2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 47 markings, 46 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 272 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((2 <= CLOSED)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 30 markings, 29 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-3.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 294 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((3 <= TIMEWAIT) OR (2 <= CLOSEWAIT) OR (xCLOSING <= SYNSENT) OR (xFINACK <= SYN) OR (xFINACK <= 2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 5 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-4.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 134 markings, 133 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 321 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((xCLOSEWAIT + 1 <= xFIN) AND (FINWAIT1 <= 2) AND (1 <= FINACK))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 16 markings, 15 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 353 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((LASTACK + 1 <= xFINACK) OR (xSYNACK + 1 <= FINWAIT2) OR (xTIMEWAIT <= xSYNRCVD))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 12 markings, 11 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 393 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((ESTAB <= CLOSEWAIT) OR (TIMEWAIT <= xFIN) OR (2 <= LISTEN) OR (xLISTEN + 1 <= FINWAIT2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 276 markings, 286 edges
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 442 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((xCLOSED <= 1) OR (xLASTACK <= 1) OR (FINACK + 1 <= ESTAB))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-8.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 19 markings, 18 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 505 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((xFIN <= 2) AND (SYN + 1 <= CLOSING) AND (2 <= CLOSING))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-9.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 102 markings, 101 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 589 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (TRUE))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: TRUE
lola: processed formula length: 4
lola: 3 rewrites
lola: formula mentions 0 of 30 places; total mentions: 0
lola: closed formula file TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: processed formula with 0 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 707 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((2 <= xTIMEWAIT) AND (2 <= CLOSED) AND ((3 <= xSYN) OR (2 <= FINWAIT1)) AND (xESTAB <= xFINACK))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 8 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-11.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 32 markings, 31 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 884 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((3 <= LASTACK) AND (SYN <= FIN) AND ((3 <= CLOSING) OR (2 <= xSYNRCVD)) AND (xSYNSENT <= 2) AND (xFINACK <= 2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 10 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 33 markings, 32 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-12.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 1179 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (()))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: TRUE
lola: processed formula length: 4
lola: 3 rewrites
lola: formula mentions 0 of 30 places; total mentions: 0
lola: closed formula file TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: processed formula with 0 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 14 will run for 1769 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((CLOSED <= xLISTEN) AND (FINACK <= xFINWAIT2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 31 markings, 30 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 3539 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((2 <= xCLOSED))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 30 markings, 29 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: yes yes yes no no yes no no no yes yes yes yes yes yes no
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-0 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-1 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-2 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-3 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-4 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-5 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-6 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-7 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-8 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-9 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
----- Kill lola and sara stdout -----
----- Kill lola and sara stderr -----
----- Finished stdout -----
----- Finished stderr -----

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TCPcondis-PT-30"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="irma4mcc-full"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TCPcondis-PT-30.tgz
mv TCPcondis-PT-30 execution
cd execution
pwd
ls -lh

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-3637"
echo " Executing tool irma4mcc-full"
echo " Input is TCPcondis-PT-30, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r174-smll-152708744900215"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;