Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................
/home/mcc/execution
total 220K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 15 18:54 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 15 18:54 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K May 15 18:54 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 15 18:54 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 15 18:50 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 15 18:50 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 15 18:54 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 15 18:54 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 15 18:54 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 15 18:54 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 107 May 15 18:54 ReachabilityDeadlock.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 345 May 15 18:54 ReachabilityDeadlock.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 15 18:54 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 15 18:54 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 15 18:50 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 15 18:50 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 15 18:50 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 15 18:50 model.pnml
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-3637
Executing tool irma4mcc-structural
Input is Planning-PT-none, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r127-smll-152673528900005
=====================================================================

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1526799456323


BK_STOP 1526799501870

--------------------
content from stderr:

Prefix is 75f5f979.
Reading known information in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/75f5f979-known.json.
Reading learned information in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/75f5f979-learned.json.
Reading value translations in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/75f5f979-values.json.
Using directory /home/mcc/execution for input, as it contains a model.pnml file.
Using Planning-PT-none as instance name.
Using Planning as model name.
Using algorithm or tool bmdt.
Model characteristics are: {'Examination': 'ReachabilityCardinality', 'Place/Transition': True, 'Colored': False, 'Relative-Time': 1, 'Relative-Memory': 1, 'Ordinary': True, 'Simple Free Choice': False, 'Extended Free Choice': False, 'State Machine': False, 'Marked Graph': False, 'Connected': False, 'Strongly Connected': False, 'Source Place': False, 'Sink Place': True, 'Source Transition': False, 'Sink Transition': False, 'Loop Free': False, 'Conservative': False, 'Sub-Conservative': False, 'Nested Units': False, 'Safe': False, 'Deadlock': None, 'Reversible': None, 'Quasi Live': True, 'Live': None}.
Known tools are: [{'Time': 423, 'Memory': 107.64, 'Tool': 'lola'}, {'Time': 484, 'Memory': 107.17, 'Tool': 'lola'}].
Learned tools are: [{'Tool': 'itstools'}].
ReachabilityCardinality lola Planning-PT-none...
----- Start make prepare stderr -----

Time: 3600 - MCC
----- Start make prepare stdout -----
===========================================================================================
Planning-PT-none: translating PT Petri net model.pnml into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating PT Petri net complete


checking for too many tokens
===========================================================================================
Planning-PT-none: translating PT formula ReachabilityCardinality into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating formula complete
touch formulae;
----- Start make result stdout -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
ReachabilityCardinality @ Planning-PT-none @ 3540 seconds
----- Start make result stderr -----
----- Start make result stdout -----
lola: LoLA will run for 3540 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: reading net from model.pnml.lola
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml.lola
lola: 254/65536 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: finding significant places
lola: 126 places, 128 transitions, 82 significant places
lola: computing forward-conflicting sets
lola: computing back-conflicting sets
lola: 124 transition conflict sets
lola: TASK
lola: reading formula from Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: E (F (((2 <= p43) AND (1 <= p67)))) : E (F ((2 <= p90))) : A (G ((p43 <= p126))) : E (F (((p57 <= p111) AND (p4 <= p54) AND ((p46 <= p30) OR (p116 <= p121)) AND (3 <= p117) AND (1 <= p100) AND ((3 <= p95) OR (2 <= p65))))) : A (G (((p55 <= 2) OR (p22 <= p3)))) : A (G ((p101 <= p71))) : E (F ((p112 <= p76))) : A (G (((p31 <= 1) OR (p121 <= 2)))) : A (G ((((p33 + 1 <= p102) OR (p115 <= 1)) AND ((3 <= p23) OR (p96 <= p17))))) : A (G ((p98 <= p96))) : E (F ((((1 <= p11) OR (p40 <= p54)) AND (2 <= p99)))) : A (G ((((p109 <= 1) OR (p6 <= 2)) AND (p93 <= p119)))) : E (F ((((3 <= p107) OR (3 <= p113)) AND (p16 <= p47) AND ((2 <= p27) OR (1 <= p65)) AND (p123 <= p5)))) : A (G (((p40 <= 0) OR (p32 <= 0) OR (p122 <= 1)))) : A (G ((p72 <= p37))) : E (F (((3 <= p69) OR ((3 <= p17) AND (p49 <= p27)) OR (2 <= p40))))
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 221 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((2 <= p43) AND (1 <= p67))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic

lola: state equation: solution impossible
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 236 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((2 <= p90)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 4 markings, 3 edges
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 252 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((p43 <= p126)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara
sara: try reading problem file Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: state equation: calling and running sara

sara: try reading problem file Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic

lola: state equation: solution impossible
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 272 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((p57 <= p111) AND (p4 <= p54) AND ((p46 <= p30) OR (p116 <= p121)) AND (3 <= p117) AND (1 <= p100) AND ((3 <= p95) OR (2 <= p65)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 24 literals and 4 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-3.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 18 markings, 17 edges
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 295 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((p55 <= 2) OR (p22 <= p3))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-4.sara
sara: try reading problem file Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-3.sara.
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-4.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic


lola: state equation: solution impossible
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 321 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((p101 <= p71)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 10 markings, 13 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 354 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((p112 <= p76)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: lola: result: yesstate equation: calling and running sara

lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 4 markings, 3 edges
sara: try reading problem file Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara.lola:
========================================
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 393 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((p31 <= 1) OR (p121 <= 2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: 2 markings, 2 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-7.saralola: subprocess 8 will run for 442 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola:
...considering subproblem: A (G ((((p33 + 1 <= p102) OR (p115 <= 1)) AND ((3 <= p23) OR (p96 <= p17)))))
lola: lola: ========================================
sara: try reading problem file Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara.
========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-8.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 7 markings, 6 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 505 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((p98 <= p96)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 5 markings, 4 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-9.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 590 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((((1 <= p11) OR (p40 <= p54)) AND (2 <= p99))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 7 markings, 6 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-10.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 708 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((((p109 <= 1) OR (p6 <= 2)) AND (p93 <= p119))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-11.sara
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic


lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-11.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic

lola: state equation: solution produced
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 885 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((((3 <= p107) OR (3 <= p113)) AND (p16 <= p47) AND ((2 <= p27) OR (1 <= p65)) AND (p123 <= p5))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 16 literals and 4 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-12.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 12 markings, 11 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 1180 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((p40 <= 0) OR (p32 <= 0) OR (p122 <= 1))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 6 markings, 5 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-13.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 14 will run for 1770 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((p72 <= p37)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
sara: lola: try reading problem file Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-12.sara.
STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 8 markings, 10 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 3540 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((3 <= p69) OR ((3 <= p17) AND (p49 <= p27)) OR (2 <= p40))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 328 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 3 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic

lola: state equation: solution impossible
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: no yes yes yes yes no yes yes no no yes no yes no no no

FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-0 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-1 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-2 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-3 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-4 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-5 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-6 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-7 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-8 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-9 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Planning-PT-none-ReachabilityCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
----- Kill lola and sara stdout -----
----- Kill lola and sara stderr -----
----- Finished stdout -----
----- Finished stderr -----

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Planning-PT-none"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="irma4mcc-structural"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Planning-PT-none.tgz
mv Planning-PT-none execution
cd execution
pwd
ls -lh

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-3637"
echo " Executing tool irma4mcc-structural"
echo " Input is Planning-PT-none, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r127-smll-152673528900005"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;