Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................
/home/mcc/execution
total 196K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 15 18:54 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 15 18:54 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 15 18:54 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 15 18:54 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 15 18:50 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 15 18:50 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 15 18:54 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K May 15 18:54 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 15 18:54 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K May 15 18:54 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 102 May 15 18:54 ReachabilityDeadlock.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 340 May 15 18:54 ReachabilityDeadlock.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 15 18:54 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 15 18:54 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 15 18:50 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 15 18:50 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 15 18:50 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 15 18:50 model.pnml
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-3637
Executing tool irma4mcc-full
Input is MAPK-PT-320, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-csrt-152666472300194
=====================================================================

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1527139507846


BK_STOP 1527139553110

--------------------
content from stderr:

Prefix is 65b80f64.
Reading known information in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/65b80f64-known.json.
Reading learned information in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/65b80f64-learned.json.
Reading value translations in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/65b80f64-values.json.
Using directory /home/mcc/execution for input, as it contains a model.pnml file.
Using MAPK-PT-320 as instance name.
Using MAPK as model name.
Using algorithm or tool bmdt.
Model characteristics are: {'Examination': 'ReachabilityCardinality', 'Place/Transition': True, 'Colored': False, 'Relative-Time': 1, 'Relative-Memory': 1, 'Ordinary': True, 'Simple Free Choice': False, 'Extended Free Choice': False, 'State Machine': False, 'Marked Graph': False, 'Connected': True, 'Strongly Connected': True, 'Source Place': False, 'Sink Place': False, 'Source Transition': False, 'Sink Transition': False, 'Loop Free': True, 'Conservative': False, 'Sub-Conservative': False, 'Nested Units': False, 'Safe': False, 'Deadlock': None, 'Reversible': None, 'Quasi Live': True, 'Live': None}.
Known tools are: [{'Time': 265, 'Memory': 111.74, 'Tool': 'lola'}, {'Time': 317, 'Memory': 111.23, 'Tool': 'lola'}, {'Time': 874332, 'Memory': 15936.64, 'Tool': 'marcie'}, {'Time': 888869, 'Memory': 15936.74, 'Tool': 'marcie'}].
Learned tools are: [{'Tool': 'lola'}].
Learned tool lola is 1.0x far from the best tool lola.
ReachabilityCardinality lola MAPK-PT-320...

Time: 3600 - MCC
----- Start make prepare stdout -----
----- Start make prepare stderr -----
===========================================================================================
MAPK-PT-320: translating PT Petri net model.pnml into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating PT Petri net complete


checking for too many tokens
===========================================================================================
MAPK-PT-320: translating PT formula ReachabilityCardinality into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating formula complete
touch formulae;
----- Start make result stderr -----
----- Start make result stdout -----
ReachabilityCardinality @ MAPK-PT-320 @ 3540 seconds
----- Start make result stdout -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
lola: LoLA will run for 3540 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: reading net from model.pnml.lola
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml.lola
lola: 52/65536 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: finding significant places
lola: 22 places, 30 transitions, 15 significant places
lola: computing forward-conflicting sets
lola: computing back-conflicting sets
lola: 25 transition conflict sets
lola: TASK
lola: reading formula from MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: A (G (((Phase3 <= MEKP) OR (2 <= Phase1) OR ((2 <= MEKPP_Phase2) AND (1 <= MEKP_RafP) AND ((1 <= Raf_RasGTP) OR (ERKP_Phase3 <= Phase1)))))) : E (F ((Phase2 + 1 <= ERKP_Phase3))) : A (G ((3 <= Phase2))) : A (G (((ERKP <= 1) OR (MEKP_RafP <= 2) OR (ERKP_Phase3 <= RasGTP)))) : E (F ((((Phase2 <= ERKPP) AND (1 <= MEKPP_Phase2) AND ((ERKP <= MEK) OR (ERK_MEKPP <= MEKP))) OR ((ERKPP <= MEK_RafP) AND (2 <= Phase3) AND (RasGTP <= ERKP_Phase3))))) : E (F (((Phase1 <= 0) AND (Phase2 + 1 <= MEKP_Phase2) AND ((MEK + 1 <= Raf_RasGTP) OR ((2 <= Phase2) AND (3 <= MEKP_Phase2)))))) : E (F (((2 <= Raf_RasGTP) AND (2 <= ERKP_Phase3) AND (MEKP_Phase2 <= Raf_RasGTP) AND (ERKP_MEKPP <= MEKPP_Phase2) AND ((2 <= MEKPP) OR (Phase1 <= Raf))))) : A (G ((Raf_RasGTP <= RasGTP))) : A (G ((MEKP_Phase2 <= ERK))) : E (F (((Phase3 <= 2) OR ((RafP <= MEK) AND (1 <= RafP) AND (2 <= Phase1) AND (ERK <= RafP))))) : A (G ((ERK_MEKPP <= 2))) : E (F ((Phase1 <= MEK))) : A (G ((2 <= ERK))) : E (F (((2 <= ERKP) AND (ERK_MEKPP <= RafP) AND (ERK + 1 <= ERK_MEKPP) AND (ERKP_MEKPP <= 2) AND (RafP_Phase1 + 1 <= MEKP)))) : A (G (((MEK + 1 <= ERK_MEKPP) OR (ERKP_Phase3 <= 2) OR (1 <= ERK_MEKPP) OR (MEKPP_Phase2 <= ERKPP) OR ((2 <= MEK_RafP) AND (RafP <= ERK))))) : E (F (((Phase1 <= 2) AND (ERKP <= 0) AND (ERKP_MEKPP <= MEK_RafP))))
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 221 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((Phase3 <= MEKP) OR (2 <= Phase1) OR ((2 <= MEKPP_Phase2) AND (1 <= MEKP_RafP) AND ((1 <= Raf_RasGTP) OR (ERKP_Phase3 <= Phase1))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 10 literals and 3 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 718 markings, 955 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 236 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((Phase2 + 1 <= ERKP_Phase3)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 493 markings, 659 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 252 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((3 <= Phase2)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 477 markings, 633 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 272 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((ERKP <= 1) OR (MEKP_RafP <= 2) OR (ERKP_Phase3 <= RasGTP))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-3.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 788 markings, 1140 edges
lola: ========================================
sara: try reading problem file MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality.sara.
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 295 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((((Phase2 <= ERKPP) AND (1 <= MEKPP_Phase2) AND ((ERKP <= MEK) OR (ERK_MEKPP <= MEKP))) OR ((ERKPP <= MEK_RafP) AND (2 <= Phase3) AND (RasGTP <= ERKP_Phase3)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: sara: try reading problem file MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara.
checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 9 literals and 3 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 81 markings, 80 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 321 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((Phase1 <= 0) AND (Phase2 + 1 <= MEKP_Phase2) AND ((MEK + 1 <= Raf_RasGTP) OR ((2 <= Phase2) AND (3 <= MEKP_Phase2))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 7 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 966 markings, 1285 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 354 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((2 <= Raf_RasGTP) AND (2 <= ERKP_Phase3) AND (MEKP_Phase2 <= Raf_RasGTP) AND (ERKP_MEKPP <= MEKPP_Phase2) AND ((2 <= MEKPP) OR (Phase1 <= Raf)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 10 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara.
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 15 markings, 16 edges
lola: ========================================

lola: subprocess 7 will run for 393 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((Raf_RasGTP <= RasGTP)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-7.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 42 markings, 41 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 442 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((MEKP_Phase2 <= ERK)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-8.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 1606 markings, 2326 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 505 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((Phase3 <= 2) OR ((RafP <= MEK) AND (1 <= RafP) AND (2 <= Phase1) AND (ERK <= RafP)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 5 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-9.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-9.sara.
sara: warning, failure of lp_solve (at job 414)

lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 355465 markings, 671613 edges
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 589 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((ERK_MEKPP <= 2)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-10.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-10.sara.

lola: state equation: solution produced
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 707 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((Phase1 <= MEK)))
lola: ========================================
lola: lola: ========================================SUBTASK

lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-11.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 241 markings, 319 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 884 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((2 <= ERK)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-12.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 484 markings, 722 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 1179 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((2 <= ERKP) AND (ERK_MEKPP <= RafP) AND (ERK + 1 <= ERK_MEKPP) AND (ERKP_MEKPP <= 2) AND (RafP_Phase1 + 1 <= MEKP))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 5 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-13.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 498 markings, 746 edges
lola: subprocess 14 will run for 1769 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((MEK + 1 <= ERK_MEKPP) OR (ERKP_Phase3 <= 2) OR (1 <= ERK_MEKPP) OR (MEKPP_Phase2 <= ERKPP) OR ((2 <= MEK_RafP) AND (RafP <= ERK)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: ========================================
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 10 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 24 markings, 36 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 3539 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((Phase1 <= 2) AND (ERKP <= 0) AND (ERKP_MEKPP <= MEK_RafP))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 60 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 715 markings, 951 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: no yes no no yes yes yes no no yes no yes no yes no yes
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-0 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-1 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-2 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-3 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-4 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-5 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-6 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-7 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-8 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-9 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA MAPK-PT-320-ReachabilityCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
----- Kill lola and sara stdout -----
----- Kill lola and sara stderr -----
----- Finished stdout -----
----- Finished stderr -----

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="MAPK-PT-320"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="irma4mcc-full"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/MAPK-PT-320.tgz
mv MAPK-PT-320 execution
cd execution
pwd
ls -lh

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-3637"
echo " Executing tool irma4mcc-full"
echo " Input is MAPK-PT-320, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-csrt-152666472300194"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;